in recent years, european politicians have finally turned into pygmies every time i say that a wonderful touching people are perfectly independent, european politicians are completely adapted to very difficult living conditions.

because the european data are nothing at all and the american ones at least represent something, but both are very far from the truth, if we look at how their forecasts come true. particularly in our country. the barrel has also been working according to manuals for a long time and the statement will become clear what is being transformed into a huge military training ground against russia, well, on the other hand. me bars lay, pity. he, of course, is now going through a difficult period of his life. the garden is on fire tried to escape from china , what was he told? and who are you and finally not enough, they say that

absolutely terrible sanctions have been imposed against him by the chinese authorities, he is not allowed into any chinese restaurant in europe, i hear the head of european diplomacy promises to prepare tens of thousands of ukrainians, nazis for war with us. in general, think about it, yes, well, probably smokes the head of diplomacy is preparing. the world should turn into a defensive fund. to the great spanish culture well, although what i demand from this, nothing happens in my head, that is, this literary taste is completely absent. this is the feeling of the word, that is, it does not hurt him. hearing everything that he utters

suits him. it is clear why this is generally different from contemporary european politicians. after all, in principle, they are all supranational, but please note. they are all cut off from their national base. they are all separated from their national culture. they represent themselves. these are not so unfortunate people who were torn away from the national army and thrown into the furnace. dimitri spoke very correctly. this is, by and large, such a transnational corporation, yes, which manages the territory by proxy issued by the americans, that is , they work as managers on the land occupied by the americans, they speak the language of the occupiers. and the main task, uh, to please the owners. why is it necessary to completely move away from those peoples who inhabit the conquered continent to betray the national culture to give their own language, they all the time speak some terrible versions of shakespeare's english that they speak, it's such

a boring office slang. well, it's a psychological observation. at the same time, the west for some reason convinced itself that a window of opportunity was opening before it, the flywheel of war with russia was only spinning up, the confrontation with us was unlikely to end in ukraine and would reach a new level. what if our former partners do not want to end the conflict, then we can do it, but not we are sure that they will like our version very much. our army is modern and heroic, despite the fact that in our army, of course, like all armies, there are certain problems. this is the first. second. if nato, first of all, the united states of america and its vassal, stopped supplying weapons and means of destruction to ukraine, then a special military operation. it would be completed, well, in just a few months. and if they now stop supplying their weapons,

then theirs will end in a few days. and finally, the third is any war in general. even a world war can be completed very quickly. well, either if a peace treaty is signed, or if you do what the americans did in the forty-fifth year, when they used their nuclear weapons and bombed the two japanese cities of hiroshima and nagasaki, they really then curtailed the military campaign, the price is the life of almost 300,000 civilians . it's not our american method , just so that there are no people who are not ours, because peaceful citizens. but who should be contacted from the other side, who should receive this information? we realize that

the world is changing we are at war in europe we need to move to martial law. we are involved in that we have mobilized acquisition processes. we provide equipment. we need to meet russia face to face, and not leave ukraine all the work, if we see that russia wants to take more action, for example in the baltic, then there will be expectations that we will take part in this. this will be required from our ground air force and naval forces. of course it would require. yes, he said on the thirtieth of january, she generally understands. how many minutes, a high horse will pass, declare war and poseidon and not the army will work, nothing else will be needed. well, it's just that this astronomical state will no longer exist, but okay, this is a british nerd. and here is a man who , sorry, after all, leads the largest

army in the world, which has a colossal nuclear potential. you want to tell me that this man is sane. in the world everyone else is looking at us today is america's day so everyone is here today. where is he? no? no, i don't know dude. i want to say hello to him you're trying to get me off the stage. you afraid that i will try to merge? yes, thanks a lot guys. thank you

. he is not joking at all, and there is still life in this world. because they will do it in relation to russia. uh, a privilege that members get. and by the way, their children are so their own and there, in general, this is not entirely intelligible and clearly sounded. i will briefly say. uh, for example, let's say your faculty. we have 13 budget places is not enough. uh, but in this case,

no, it's important until this year, two of them automatically departed, uh, people with special needs. hmm uh, that is, well, disabled people to put it simply, that is, if two such people tried to apply to you, respectively, with certificates, then you automatically accepted them, if three of them were held, two competitions were held, and you could participate with everyone from this year or 10 is 10%. 10%, that is, two more places were allocated for participants. here are these fighting, or on their children. i know that we have already filed. if there are two of them, one passes automatically, if there are three, four, five, then a competition is announced between them, but the one who, uh, does not pass, they they can participate in the general competition and these 10 points are added there, about which how many was the day off, well, our passing

is high, but, sometimes they decide 10 points. it all depends on the set of exams. you see , this is the main thing from the amount of the exam. how many points pass for a budget contact? i do not remember, somewhere around 10, while it is written in language that all his merits cannot bear more than 10 points. i just explained the situation. and these people in no more than 10 points look him in the face and ask him to on his face he brought to the line of combat contact and there he talked with the guys and explained to them that their feat is 10 points. and what can be two budget places. they are as much as they need for these people,

because their feat and their service to the motherland is estimated by people with frog fingers. here is such a system. well, then i want to know the name of the person who invented it, who dragged it through and who wrote it better to see his studio. and i will invite the invalids who were wounded on the battlefield to the studio so that he explains to their faces that between you, i will now arrange a competition, and for one of you who could not pass, i give him 10 points there, which will help a lot with the competition 350. i will not participate further. this discussion. i just tried to clarify after really this is a lot clear to me. yesterday it didn't sound very clear. now. actually to the topic of our today's conversation. she, in general, is spinning , repeating all the previous discussions in this studio and into her on these bodies. and here is what i would like to say, and by the way, oddly enough

, to answer your questions. and like this, uh, they asked who to contact? so i said in terms of his e in terms of questions, who also sounded in this studio. now i'll tell you about it. e, hmm. e, i want to submit, but otherwise it comes down to this, you know the first thing. so, when we read, there are historical novels, or even capitals, chronicles. i in this case have some kind of scientific we know in the past at the time there were official heads of state. li emperor here they were different in their physical chemical mental, different state. some were just lazy. there i had a desire to practice. here are the sybarites, but there have always been favorites, favorites or gray cardinals. and here the diplomats knew that they needed to be dealt with. and i don't know how it

is now. uh, here, uh, for some reason not popping up. it's not me, not with this name alone of the leaders of the current western state, these are the favorites of the favorite. well, how well i agreed with the favorite. she told him everything, how she signed the surrender there, or vice versa. uh, well, i hope that our diplomats and intelligence agencies still know such people. well, obviously not florida, not florida, but i didn’t lay this question here, but really mister white powder question is uh the most important, because in the end one way or another some specific individuals, and a hundred years that evolved. they sign something among themselves on vkontakte

, they agree on something, they don’t agree, then the conflict and so on is not so that the people will come out. it's country by country, and uh, that begs the question. that's who to negotiate with or the question that often sounds in this studio. e proposals carry blows to decision-making centers. here i am when u answer this the question of making a decision here sounds different scales, whether london well, there, and so on. it was kiev, but not the mariinsky palace, and there , somewhere, and so on. this is what i really mean. that's where to deliver such a blow, where is the center of the concept of a decision by the west , that there is a klatura on it,

that's what, it's obviously not in berlin. here is the residence. we can , by the method of elimination, go there for all 40% of the conversation with the admiral, some kind of accuracy of our weapons, it was said that it found hitting the head in the squares.

well then, what are they arguing about? you didn't ask me, did you? what are the goals? who was arguing? that is, you want to talk combo. and i know exactly where the center is. come to a decision , i'm uh more and more inclined to, uh, well, what is commonly called a conspiracy theory? uh-huh that's it but uh, i can't put it down, what's good, let's say it's doing what it's gathered there? uh, well, the whole state dropped more. this is a guard dog and so on. here are gathered here people. how many 20 people are us citizens and they accept everything solutions. russia is russia russia here

it is clear that while the one who is in power is the president. this is the center of decision-making, but the west believed otherwise all the time it was necessary for all the banking. no. our decision-making center had nothing to do with it. now now it's, uh, now. it's definitely a decision-making president. there, further residences can be considered. no, i seriously said, because you want us to point it out to me.

what is this place? i have an idea how you can get it to the command post. it's a secure communications system. it's reeling the system of power exclusively, as a military system, not only the civil one is the same , not that person already cut off from the means of communication reminds gorbachev of the characters, but there is no power, there is no management, therefore there must be a combination of a person and the ability to exercise control. no. here, explain to me now i uh go a little further. let's. just 5 years ago, they laughed when the question of the lgbt movement as a political force was raised. are you listening to anyone now? no, i'm not laughing anymore

but explain to me, if the usa is the center of that same power over the whole world, then, probably, they also want the health of survival before their nation. how do you want to rule the world, but the most honest, or what? no, why is it simply or is it easier to manage a society atomized? so well, it’s covered there, somehow it’s not a fact, but what’s the problem is not, real people who make decisions are a big question, but again, if again there are no other institutions other than the actual authorities. well, yes, it is, as it were, limitless, yes, no matter how fact, this is so, here before everything was just here many people with fidelity from marxism. so, uh, the productive force develops; they develop relations of production . now i'm talking fucking no cardinal decisions every day

there is a conversation in all the studios. e in all information is nuclear where is this world war going, unfortunately to a nuclear war. that is, you e fatalistically raise it as an inevitability, but what options do you have, these inevitability are good. it's just a bast of military confrontation is growing capacities used used weapons. here we see for ourselves how from the zhilins there is a constant increase in the hummers from the hammerson to other systems, where the f-16 is completely suspended. this is not a category, good or bad. this is just a separate military science for a while, they will say that unfortunately we have to use such a military science separately, but military science does not lead to the fact that war must necessarily be only therefore there is a moment, and diplomacy before exists in order to expose these warriors, if possible, or there is science, diplomacy. but as

science by the way, there are no corresponding universities and universities and as a science, it exists, it exists diplomatic sciences there are diplomatic sciences here according to poly none of them, because if we are always called different by us, these are different things. i still have student years that this is not science. good luck, just for in the history of science, issued in soviet times on the basis of a dissertation protected by gmos, russian diplomacy from the time. e svyatoslav, of course, they began to break it down to stop science or some kind of svyatoslav, so it becomes there is military science, of course there is, doctor of the military, of course. this is an example of a simple

don't go economy. if everything is decided then what to discuss, then she does not understand, yet, what you want, so everything is with you. then why are we here with this, and then. what did you decide? i don’t know where you are, where the optimists have prepared for me. so i want to understand where it is, but it seems to me that such a rather strange presumption of ignorance. why, in general , humanity knows more than they know. yes? i remember this version somewhere, i think i heard it was such a funny ancient greek, which you still explained, i draw then and explain that his circumference there is the area of ​​ignorance, increased so much, since the area of ​​knowledge has increased fresh

thoughts for several thousand years. yes i remember. yes, it was like that, you know, they don’t suit you. they are easy when you pounce on them. here , and this, apparently, it says it to you, and i'm afraid more comrade reads incredibly that when you accept, well, those who support here. we make a decision to strike at the center of the opposite decision-making at dart you strike the church will be destroyed, but the decision is made in a different focus, we know where it means any use of nuclear weapons is decided no by the studio, not by journalists, but is decided in accordance with the concept of national security approved by the security council by the president of the russian federation, where it is clearly spelled out. when, how, under what

circumstances, can it be used in our country very clearly, everything is spelled out a little for whom? under what conditions, as he has repeatedly explained, that nuclear weapons are used primarily against those means that represent the maximum load, so strategic is applied not against decision centers, but. the locations of nuclear strategic nuclear weapons, that is, the deep chat, is just incomprehensible, because there is military science for this, when we talk about butar at decision-making centers it is absolutely not necessary to shy away from them in nuclear weapons. for this , completely different means can be used together with blows to the centers. decision making decision center is quite specific a military term that implies not only a person who thinks that he controls something, then you have to beat the houses of the insane, which we will never do for

humane reasons. here they are inhabited by people who are sure that they rule the world with a specific communication node. by which commands can be transferred to the troops, and so on and so forth, this is a disbandment of a special look, because when there were all sorts of specialists, the knowledge of its one-sidedness, which they said under a pseudonym, but the essence is different. just when we aspire from it is nothing. i told you to change. i tell you everything, because no matter what ideas you have, if you cannot convey them to the world, then no one will know about them. doesn't matter. what decision do you make. if you cannot implement it in front of these troops as a team, then this decision will remain. everything is correct. nobody argues with this. this is how it works. it's just a specific military term for a decision-making center. this is not an area of ​​speculation. this is a very specific story, but it is not is exhausted by the warriors, as such then

the solution is indisputably wider. krylchane, that's what he was talking about, well, this is a reptilian. this is a different version. ok then. by the way, yes, it is not known that it was deficient a week ago, just in this studio e we discussed hmm those acts that, uh, were committed in stockholm against the holy for muslims. e books in relation to the koran and we talked about the fact that those people who commit these are the people who attack christianity, and in general fight against religion. as such , a week has passed, and today i read the news that three applications have already been submitted for holding shares. if one of them is the action of burning the koran, which has already become traditional in stockholm, then the other two involve the burning of the torah and the burning of the bible, though both, uh, books want to live in front of

the israeli embassy i read about this at first , it surprised me. i thought why in front of the israeli embassy well, the bible is also clear what became quite obvious why did i start to conduct some kind of logical chains? this very much reminded me of the actions against the nigerman spirit, which were carried out in the thirties by the nazis, which began burning books, and in general were the embodiment of the attitude towards christianity that they had at that time and developed to an even greater degree. i would like to dwell on this in detail. you know, alfedrozenberg was such a big supporter of the idea of ​​aryan christianity, which was formed there back in the 19th century, which said that in general there is little good in christianity, because it is all jewish in essence. and if you can make it, not jewish. here, clean out everything that you don’t like, leave what you like and well, call it at least some kind of christian. this was the initial version of the fight against

christianity. i draw an analogy to today, when the liberal elites and representatives of these western liberal movements. they're so very selective in approaching christianity, and everything they don't uh like and everything that goes against their uh different, twisted fantasies. they offer to fight against this, they change the churches on their territory , they bring their m-th executors of their leaders there, who, in general, distort the essence of christian teaching beyond recognition. eh, there were such supporters of the version of the development of christianity. there, many supporters of himmler argued that christianity was originally invented by the ancient germans. and there is no relationship at all. i, too, draw parallels with today's world, when all modern freedom is the concept of the rights and freedoms of a citizen. they are trying in every possible way to root it in the ancient world, which was built on sacrifices of violence against

a person in slavery. and they are trying in every possible way to deny the role of christianity in this and are trying to root modern culture in the one that has little in common with modern europe and the modern west. finally. here, if so try to generalize this experience. i think we can come to a surprising conclusion that e nazism, which he and he has been discussed here many times. it's just that these events stumbled upon this idea for me, that nazism, as an announcement, is inextricably linked with liberalism. it is the flesh of the flesh of liberalism is the logical conclusion of the philosophical concept that was created and the social order that existed then. we understand very well what shall we say, modern liberalism in one of its foundations. he has an idea about a person about a society that gops presented in his time. is it that if we read to a person today to communicate with other people

, it would be simply difficult for us to read aliens. either his work is the main one, we would probably pretend that a living being is worse than a person. didn't live on earth at all. never because hobbes denies that man needs to be deduced from the divine plan and deduces him from animal nature and they say, that a person by himself, except for the chaos of the evil of violence, does not create anything, therefore the only thing that can keep him is a strong state and such an agreement that fastens very tightly. this is public order. this is, in general, one of the main, presupposing works for liberalism. but at the same time, if you think about these ideas, this is a very good basis for laying the foundation for the further development of this totalitarianism.