[000:00:32;00] all these fabrications about the need to accept ukraine into nato in order to contain it on the model of turkey yes, but he is quoted by him , they repeat that they say that in order to contain ukraine, he changed his point of view three times. well, they didn’t find a friend of russia either, i say again that ukraine in nato

for russia is categorically in no case, therefore, if if they say there. boris nikolayevich boris nikolayevich yeltsin yes, this is an angry phenomenal geopolitical stupidity that borders on betrayal. yes, betrayal is quite true, which will limit with stupidity. well, this is philology. it is important to appear and betrayal is just such an order. this is a betrayal that will limit with sadness he has this betrayal, then this is just not stupidity. these are conscious actions and the question

is for what specific gingerbread? well, yes, for one, paris was worth a mass, but for another, ambitions spent everything differently. well , of course it's a shame. in general, i think that we need to seize the initiative. right now , i am by no means giving advice at the front. there is the whole canons of military science, when they go, respectively, to the counterattack, what should i be there coefficient, the loss of that side of the degree, this is war - this is mathematics. now i'm talking about something else. i am now more using, such as armament , foreign policy steps to change the goals and the nature of the defeats inflicted on them now. yes, well, rather in this direction. look, as long as

there are no nuclear weapons, but in any case , we already have cellar weapons, a lot of people are already defeated, of course, we need to change the supporter of the use of nuclear weapons. well again, i'm not a military man, so i can afford it. yes, i ask, and immediately it is as pointless as possible. and in general, when i talk about the use of nuclear weapons, i can repeat the idea 156 times, which we will often voice next year as a lieutenant, that to begin with, conduct a test and show that we have what it is in a combat state so that they understand that we are not joking, because the world has not seen for a long time guaranteed. yes. first you understand the documents. here is the first step. it can be said that the first step for the explosion to occur, and in parallel to turn off these monitoring systems, do whatever you want. it is simply important for me that the west has no doubts that we have nuclear weapons, that they are in proper

condition. and that we are ready to apply it, if this requires a condition, but they don’t know and understand it perfectly, they know it very well. i don't know what kind and what kind of danger the demonstration will change anything. what kind of nuclear weapons does russia have based on what we have seen about what they say i have big doubts about the degree and knowledge and understanding, both the will of the leadership and the technical possibility after i read that we produce 200 new tanks a year and that we do not have an army that it has become unacceptable. i realized that their level of intelligence analysis and data acquisition, to put it politely, has nothing to do with the real state of doing and was happy for us. you probably have strong bytes from the tribune, you won’t invite to helsinki yes, that’s what you want, yes, for now. hello south carolina thank you

nicky, for this performance, if you're wondering, i'm kicking this podium, but it's not working. how about that. okay. maybe i'll get on top of her and give it my all. i'll be six foot four. that's exactly how he explained that he was the final in the podium. if he knocked it over, he would stand taller. so yes, yes, yes. so with these people it's one of the few things that can be done, of course there is an axiom, the cold war it's better to be dead than a red year. and the fact that they are now repeating this one, rehashing the absolute such and people they have learned something. they absorbed it at school in kindergarten. if someone yes someone visited, therefore, it's better to be dead than to be under russia, everything and with this, based on this, they will substitute any ammunition here yes, it's really a big

question how we will answer this, because e cluster munitions are prohibited , essentially a convention. 123 states signed there. not we, not ukraine, not the united states, not india , not pakistan, not israel, not ukraine, we did not sign, but the fact is that it was signed there half of nato is almost all and now the macrons of the day are in a very difficult situation. no, it's very simple they told the country. nato decides for themselves. what type of weapons to supply ukraine is not a decision on this decision, each specific decision is each specific. the countries are the decision of the united states, but the point is that it would be interesting , indeed, to carry it out now. as you rightly said you can. eh, nothing. this resolution will not allow the question to be raised. avité un security to put this issue before the general assembly and corresponding resolution. how will this convention be put into practice by those who signed it? this

shows very well the duplicity of the west, which western policy in the person of the united states in the person of the current administration is now demonstrating, therefore, a diplomatic offensive, based on this statement by biden, as the head of state. i don’t know who will play there, most likely, they made this decision a long time ago, because it started like a wave at once, when different american departments talk about in one and the same it says that the decision was thought out and prepared moreover, it is interesting to mess around. for how is the administration going to explain this decision to its legislators first of all, because inside and as in congress within the democratic party. there are quite a few people, like hanamar, who filed a resolution that how are we losing moral authority, that is, the administration

will need to explain to their fellow party members. why do they do it i think that the party discipline will eventually work. naturally, especially in the context of the upcoming elections, in the end , every congressman also needs to be re-elected in the house of representatives. let me remind you that elections are held every 2 years, and the national committee distributes committees there. states - the administration has a great influence, so they will present this rebellion, but in itself it will show. yes , they opposed this within the democratic party, that the republicans understand this. the enemy must be strangled. that is, the democratic elections approaching the enemy must be strangled, but a group has also formed within the democratic party, which , well, as it were, their perceptions of the administration’s policy are incompatible with the principles that were previously stated. another question is a very interesting question that interests me in

terms of. here is the upcoming summit when biden clearly states. ukraine cannot apply for nato membership under the simplified procedure. she will have to go through all these stages, that is, ukraine is a member. it must not be, but we will stand for ukraine now there have already been several leaks of what he will say. here on wednesday evening in vilnius, this is that nato should redouble its efforts to support ukraine, that nato needs to do everything now, that is , to give everything everything that is, because it is necessary to ensure the victory of ukraine before the autumn thaw and then winter, in which will be more difficult to fight and the fact that everything that is meant already from the warehouses of nato yes, already gardens, that is, it means that nato is becoming bare ethers and it's time. send cossacks platov and uvarov to raid

berlin, paris, this statement is already being made by a macron, about the fact that a may be, as a guarantee for ukraine , the nuclear arsenal of france, a real friend, will be involved there. yes, he controls his nuclear arsenal, or, to be honest , he has already been honestly captured in the french arsenal, but , nevertheless, at least well done with a support rating, like france's fat-free kefir, just take more from the police. krona does not care for him not to be re-elected. he never messed up there, remember yeah said, in general, you understand that then what will you be ready for in paris . it’s just that the evolution from the brainless nato was his statement, so that before this support, the evolution is interesting and, uh, the most unpleasant thing is that he, of course, is there

will develop the theme of what we had here a few days ago, well, a couple of weeks ago , the mutiny, as indicators that the efforts of the allies are working and therefore it is necessary to continue to apply these efforts. the most interesting thing is that, in principle, the united states , as itself, as a power, could give anything can be done to ukraine, but mainly it is not necessary to give the status of the main ally, it is not necessary to accept 20 countries in the whole, so to speak, all over the world are the main allies. afghanistan has been liberated, yes, especially since there is and is here. the question, as it were, so to speak, is open. this is at the request of the secretary of defense, as with the advice of the secretary of state. and you can actually give, but the united states does not want to take responsibility. and this moment, i emphasize all the time, because

well, now he spoke. i consider william byrds to be a smart person, head of the cia, he also held a number of demotic posts in his time, was deputy secretary of state, who nevertheless says that yes, russia is still a threat now. yes, a very dangerous threat. we still need to pay attention to china , and now the americans are pursuing a policy. i still think that it is aimed at shifting responsibility to ukraine and russia on the western deterrent that is in arsenal so they can follow them will nevermind. by default, you don't need his zipper. here we have a calculation that they have, that vladimir is longer. i am sorry. there is no such thing as, for example, like, here, like a nato base or a nato warehouse this is a figure of speech warehouse and uh, the base can only be a national american base in italy there an american base in poland how much

they have that they can now give ukraine and the state , you understand, probably, yes, just calculate, based on this, maybe then, so as not to get up twice at once bases to strike, if all the same, all these weapons should go across the crimea, the armored divisions of finland and sweden are what the gates are, well, then you will find the naval forces and the marine corps of portugal and so on, you don’t know why. no, we are not american, unless there is no one to kill american bases, but we are not american intelligence. why don't we know? why do you underestimate our various? we know very well. it must be in nature, no, it is not possible, but it is not in nature, therefore it is not what they are want to transfer. oh, and biden, what is he going

to convey? no, he makes a scary face. we must be going to transfer what is in european warehouses, and the fact that apparently there is the united states while biden is doing two more trips is also interesting at first, the bitch with whom he i don’t know he knows him now you know him, he thinks that it's someone behind the suitcase. well, here, yes. that's when it's like the first time, well, in any case, the baydan, maybe send, because the british will have to answer for this, and the second owl and in finns. apparently, he is going to talk about the deployment of some contingents , after all, helsinki is dreaming. yes, piercing force is here, it will not be far from here. maybe e fly. as if. well, what's interesting is what you 're seeing going. yes, they are going to vilnius going to vilnius. interestingly, the musicians do not want mars to hold justice. and this was asked by kant. this i don't know. i've been here already once

. it was to check the readiness of the western military district on the eleventh . well, for god's sake, yes, something like that strategies so lift the air, but the important thing is that i finish it is important that they emphasize all the time. the fact that the main task for them is china, that's double deterrence. this is the main idea of ​​janet no there are frames. well, let's show it. who are playing with a chinese head, a planned woman. stop bowing enough. stop stopping china from continuing to buy us treasury bonds, how else can she behave.

okay, let's start with the fun stuff. if it comes to that, here are the tunatas themselves, lithuania has prepared indo-pacific security strategy . oh how great. i really turned on. here's some alternate reality. the grand duchy of lithuania reached the arctic ocean, reached the pacific ocean and turned right around, and vilnius now accepts everyone. well, this is generally, well, in general , say that they are going to share their experience with everyone else. how to deal with china is fun. in general, here is the topic that was raised about the fact that they consider us weak and we see all these things. on the one hand, she's funny. we understand that this

not this way. on the other hand, this is dangerous, because inadequate people make inadequate decisions based on inadequate information. it is very, very difficult when there is a huge grouping on one side and a huge grouping of nuclear weapons on the other side. there are nuclear weapons, here is an inadequate president who kicks his podium and in general they do not understand. why is he standing there? it's actually scary to eat, uh against this backdrop. adequate people like a billboard , which i would try to quote said, the only generally correct thing, with which we can agree on, the task of the united states is to shape the world of the future, relying on its strengths on the teallians, who

are here, i would say here. well, let's leave our army to do what it has to do. and that she is good at exactly what she advises herself and us. let's build on our strengths, build on the alliances that we should have in the next world to prepare our future. this is our task will not. we will be looked at as weak, because this whole situation, when they still look at us as weak. it is precisely because of the fact that we, well , somehow, for the last decade, have gone on the defensive. and no matter what happened there, we pushed back, kicked back, justified ourselves, but did not really take any offensive actions. and naturally, when you take such a position, they begin

to call you a weakling. and now, when this image, so to speak, has become attached to you, it is very difficult to change it. when you then start to do something adequately strong and it is clear that you still win many, looking at this they think that it happened by chance and do not believe that in fact russia is now a completely different country. that's what they wanted. that's what too even the same byrne writes. yes, what, uh, well, in the army there are problems with industry, problems, the power is swinging here, there is a rebellion. there is a mutiny here, there, and so on, the operation has shaken up the whole country in a year and a half. this is absolutely not the russia that was a year and a half ago. this is absolutely not the kind of russia that is able to simply go with

the flow somewhere and wait for what will happen to it do next. it’s like always, a medal has two sides and a glass, maybe half empty half full, now i ’m convinced half full, because we were forced to wake up by this war that was imposed on us , we were forced to look at our past to understand what we have it should be in the future to go to this future, including using such simple advice that the enemy gives us. we need to actively shape our own future. yes, this means that we must understand what we are strong in, and we are strong in what we are strong we are in the most important thing, because we are the largest geographical power on the planet. we have interests everywhere next to us, if not allies, then countries that are well aware that

no new world can be built on the basis of american hegemony, that their future is connected with our future, who are ready to work with us in alliances, both political and and technological, we understand that a new world is being formed now. we understand that these alliances should be technologically, including in space, in including in artificial intelligence, including biotechnology and so on and so on and so on. and if we don't. then we will not build a new world, and now our main task is to have it arise inside us. this is the desire of the movement the revival of our revival the revival of our country, as a great power, and we need to make sure that the people who want our power to be reborn come together, because we still have a lot of waiters and traitors, and those people ,

who look to the future must come together and make this future together bravo can not help but comment on the outstanding behavior of the leader. now it is necessary to emphasize like this, and the gender identity of the federal reserve system in china was then

the head of ki. is there a russian word for leader? yes, here the archbishop of york also spoke and said that it turns out that the lord's prayer does not quite fit in very patriarchal sounds a woman friend, well, not your friend, i mean, well, an israeli, listen big the economic political question of the 21st century will be. and why do we need people, or at least. why do we need so many people at the moment? typical liberal fascism, uh, we heard that, well, going back, uh, glue to the leader. you

still offer. yes, the fed we say that they do not know history well. that is what does not know history well leads to mistakes. she must have read it. it used to be such a pity. no, we have some vedas here for koutov. this is triple kneeling. yes, they write there now that sitimpin is a new one emperor. she had read a lot and decided to do something like that, apparently, there, but e got in the wrong place, although in china they are very happy, they are simply happy to admit that they are overseas devils. finally, they understood how they should behave in the capital under heaven. but seriously speaking, the topic that we are discussing is cluster munitions, which are connected with some, as he said, the moral retreat of the americans. where is the end retreat? from what are they what, when you are generally different or here, uh, when let them well, about double standards? we talked all the time, i remember the balkan a crisis, when those parties to the conflict that were completely under the americans, the same

bosnian muslim croat were in general, perhaps you can imagine everything, that's the whole world press there in france there were lessons of hatred for the serbs. they talked about these stories there, and there about, uh, violation of human rights, western journalists came. under their noses were concentration camps created by the regime, avoiding, where people were screaming in pain. they didn't notice at all. here, in principle, did not notice. i'm not talking about the whole description what happened in the silversmith. where are they retreating to? they behaved as they always did and will continue to do so; they have no other morality. right now, uh, they are in parallel with the fact that they are increasing the supply of ammunition. they are trying. establish some kind of behind-the-scenes sites to create. bers is doing the same thing and platforms for sudden negotiations if cluster munitions do not help. here we will again offer some

there, for example, istanbul and they send various emissaries. there was now somehow not very different city will be found. so they have them the main goal of what they say is to deceive russia, they seriously believe that they will again be able to deceive russia absolutely and and why and because there i agree with andrei olegovich about what he said here. he may even be a little more optimistic in assessing the situation, which has stirred everything up. well, we continue to play by the rules. what is not? do we continue to play by the rules. we try not to annoy anyone. we try not to go for any provocations. we after all why they appreciate? how is weakness? so list these on the fingers of your hands. how many

grain deals have been made in the last year and a half? red lines are a number of other circumstances, they analyze they are not stupid america is not a biden that kicks the podium america is a powerful state that is fighting for its life, losing in ukraine for the americans. this is an existential loss. this will mean the end of their hegemony for the whole world. this will mean the end of the rather way of life they are accustomed to. it will be a symbol of america's weakness because biden connected and not only biden through his mouth, the ruling class of the united states of america tied their future as a great power with what is happening in ukraine and therefore it is quite possible to allow the emergence of nuclear weapons. already now they are using one here who spoke to you from the position of the liberals of fascism, they use nationalism. they say, look, what a new power bloc appeared in nato, the eastern europeans, just as they are not joyfully ready to join the battle, where does lithuania get these ambitions, and they are being pumped up with nationalism, it is moving into a new stage of shevism

imperialism. they are talking in all seriousness about the bombing of the grand duchy of lithuania, this is not the case. this is a small lithuania that is squeezed somewhere there. no, this is a big geopolitical player who claims to play a new role in the world of history. they twist as they please. right now , july 11 will be the 80th anniversary of the volyn massacre. the problem between poland and ukraine, we would say that it is a moral problem. there is no, no morality. here they are, the poles talk a lot about historical memory, which is more painful and historical memory does not allow poland to improve relations with russia history. where are you, what dictates to them? bandera decided in february 1943 to carry out a national revolution. it was to organize a genocide , they killed jews. they killed the russians, they checked the operation to clean up the villages from the soviet prisoners of war, which were

ukrainian women. it was our people who were soviet, they took the guys ransomed. it's a whole story, they killed them. and then they organized, starting in march, the massacre of up to 100,000 people. total polish population atrocities, just awful. ukraine does not change. it's not, well, okay, it's not just that the ideology of those people who did it in zita in service is the ruling