by car in rain-affected areas for a while, traffic was suspended by heavy downpours covered the morning and the crimean peninsula was put on high alert due to bad weather in simferopol by this time the rain had stopped in the city, the water had gone. how much was it? you can evaluate it yourself, but such powerful precipitation is the result of an unfavorable combination of several factors and the influence of processes of various scales over the eastern half of the european, russian territory, a vast cyclone is circling for the urals and western siberia, this whirlwind is now one of the reasons for the abnormal sleep for the western half of the european part of the country, including resort areas. this is the reason for the abnormal cooling. the frontal section separating the cold from the heat stretches from the arkhangelsk region to the rostov region, while in the southern section of the atmospheric front. a so-called wave has formed. as a result, warm air from the sea pulled its role further to the coast, the relief played, a warm moist air flow, rushed up the slopes and formed over the mountains. very powerful cumulonimbus clouds that

gave an extreme amount of precipitation not everywhere, the rains were equally intense, for example, in sochi about 90 mm of precipitation fell in adler for the same period, 187 in tuapse 142 mm. in lazarevsky 87, intense rains have passed, of course, and in the mountains and mountain rivers overflowed their banks and now bring down the accumulated water reserves on coastal cities. today the direction of the air currents has changed conditions for heavy showers no more and today on the coast are likely. only small local rains with precipitation of about 10 mm. during the day, local thunderstorms will thunder in tuapse during the day it will be mostly cloudy. rain in the evening in the clouds will appear gaps. although some rain is also possible , the maximum temperature for today is plus, 23 tomorrow partly cloudy. chance of light rain. it is 24°, on friday without precipitation with partly cloudy, + 26, but it is sunny in the daytime, 28°. in krasnodar

, local thunderstorms will also thunder today. it will rain, the maximum temperature. as part of 26°, precipitation is still likely at night. rain in the morning will stop completely. tomorrow afternoon, with variable cloudiness, the air will warm up to 28 °, on friday it will be sunny, the thermometer will reach plus 30 on saturday this minute. yes , ekaterina, thank you ekaterina grigorova spoke about the new impact of the elements on the south of russia and the forecasts for the coming days. safonov, major of the airborne forces, went for a pension. god bless america. these are very serious people.

you'll have to move out on any lawlessness. this is our house that left for a long time, there is a son palych paratrooper does not rush out of his own.

in front of you now the news, which literally just came through the tape of motherly agencies, the czech french writer milan kundera died at the age of 94, it was reported by czech television, he became famous above all, of course, for the unbearable novel and the lightness of being. he spent the last decades in france for his work, counter described in french resembles an agency. to other topics, uh, the polish parliament called ukraine to admit guilt for the volyn massacre 440 deputies took part in the vote. they all voted for the adoption of the resolution , the sejm recalled that more than 100,000 people died as a result of the tragedy. the poles were even more forced to leave their homes, as they feared for their lives , and the document emphasizes that what happened is a genocide, which was planned by the leaders of the organization of ukrainian nationalists, banned in russia, and the deputies also noted that it is important to hold

a state duma and bury a worthy victims let me remind you. first forty-third year, ukrainian nationalists. they committed murder and expelled the poles from their homes in volhynia in the eastern golitsy. the climax of the tragic events was on july 11, when hundreds of trees were attacked, according to human rights. she condemned the autoplantation of the koran and other sacred books. no resolution was adopted as a result of urgent discussions that were held at the initiative of the organization of islamic cooperation. and s. hr, called to bring to justice those responsible for the desecration of the holy book for muslims. however, many western countries voted against the resolution now , uh, live broadcast from the state duma to our attention. we started our performance. let's hear a very important question. we don't perform very often. after all, for example, as a government apparatus. moreover

, you should know that meter yurievich heads the commission on the legislator of the government of the russian federation, all legislative initiatives are considered by this commission. it is important for us today to hear a report on it, to exchange questions, to ask, to work out decision, especially when we are talking about the complete control of supervisory activities in the russian federation, these are questions in general, uh, that are driven by the entire example of grigorenko , therefore, colleagues, pay attention once again , please pay more attention to rais vasilievna. vyacheslav viktorovich at the time please return let's add the time. bring back the time indeed one of the priorities of the work of the government of the russian federation is to create a business environment and the most important element. this work is to

reduce the administrative burden on the business. you are all wonderful. you know, uh, you know very well what we're going to do and we've been really consistent over the last few years. e, we are engaged purposefully in this work one of the key one of the key areas. this work is the reform of supervisory activities. i'm not afraid of this word speech, indeed there is a reform. and the start of this work was given in the nineteenth year, by the way, in the message hmm to the parliament in the message to the federal assembly by the president of the russian federation , in fact, uh, some definite results, which e. we fix for today. we just compare with the nineteenth year. just so that, for uh, ease of perception, or something, u understand the dynamics of what is happening, uh, i emphasize once again that one of the main goals of the reform is, after all , the maximum reduction of not only

the inspections themselves, but also the most important introduction of a risk- oriented approach, a so that a review is ordered only when it is really necessary and when without it it is otherwise impossible to correct, ongoing violations or potential violations, and the reform itself was divided into three areas and, in fact, these areas are very simple and understandable. the first area of ​​work was related to the regulation of the rules that needed to be analyzed somehow and, probably, corrected . this refers to the rule that business applies in the course of business activities, the second direction is control procedures. we are well aware that any of the same efficient. in the case of a curve procedure, there will be distorted, well, the third is the creation of feedback. because without feedback , it is impossible to create an environment of trust and actually. even now, here is what i

saw during the discussion and discussions of the state duma, just at the beginning, viktorovich also pays attention to this. actually , this is democracy, when certain, including acute issues are discussed, accordingly, according to what was done in each of the three areas, the first thing that concerns the rules. well, first of all, these rules were inventoried. a big work, we have set up 43 groups of working groups in the direction. why were there 43 just segmentation done by direction? well , actually it happened, and the groups were assembled. uh, 2/3 are business representatives. this is also an important element, because only three officials attended these groups , an inventory was made of all the normal rules that businesses are required to apply while doing business . anyway. at least we found out that there are 318.000 of these rules a little bit just stating a fact. ah, each of these rules was analyzed, and as a result, 143.000 were canceled on the basis of

reasoning. uh not relevant deprecated incorrectly and so on and so forth. this is an absolutely collegial decision of the business authorities of the state. er, well the entrepreneurial community. this is about forty-five percent of about 120,000 rules and regulations. were recognized as relevant fair this is to answer the question, when sometimes they exaggerate they say that everything is bad with us. not everything is 120,000. this order there under 40%, and the requirements left the period. a at the same time, the most difficult federal law on mandatory requirements 247 was adopted. and here, without deputies or without the participation of deputies of the state duma, this would simply be impossible to do, which introduced two very serious rules or two such very serious ones.

uh, the actions of serious norms, uh, which uh, with which we live in the last few years, the first thing is that the rules that business applies when condemning entrepreneurial activity are obliged to at the age of 6, the second important rule is to be reaffirmed that all rules within the year can be introduced only twice a year on march 1 and september 1 - this is really very convenient. why because, uh, well, first of all, business can prepare for this. secondly, it strongly systematizes all of us. the second direction of work is the procedures. as for the procedures, then, but to inventory the entire regulatory framework. we came to the conclusion that we had our own verification procedure for each type of supervision. in fact. it was a huge problem because to explain to a businessman or enterprise. why was it tacked on the part of the state - coming to check it was impossible to check all the time in different ways at different times with different procedures. yes, and it is not necessary,

respectively, to be done. we actually codified the current legislation that defines the rules for conducting inspections. it is indeed the most important tool. we are one conceptual apparatus, the same terms, the same procedures , the same forms, and so on and so on and so on. what made the check uniform the audit was done in a uniform way and you just understood the scale of the changes, then, well, in addition to the federal law 248 itself, and which for many years was considered at the site of the state duma, uh, was corrected and worked out there. and this is also a separate area of ​​activity. by the way, i want to say a huge thank you to the deputies, because we would not have this law without you. well, it would be impossible to implement and, uh , this vyacheslav viktorovich volodin personally supervised and i apologize oleg viktorovich morozov olga viktorovna sevastyan. e, and. well, this is in

general such a collective indeed. e was, work done. uh, as a result, we have standardized and codified verification procedures. this is very important second hmm means in terms of scale, to be understood in parallel was amended, 132, a sectoral laws. 132 which in one way or another concerned the procedure, because we are talking about not only federal, but regional and municipal nazor. a-a, more than 350 departmental acts were corrected. well, so too uh in as a small note of more than 35,000 municipal regional acts, which in one way or another relate to the sphere of control and supervision. it is also reflected in the law that all scheduled inspections, uh, are mandatory coordinated with the uh, general, prosecutor's office today. this is the norm of the law. well, the most important element was the consolidation of the risk-oriented mandatory application of the risk

-based approach in the federal legislation when conducting the second important element in the control procedures is the digitalization of control procedures. and we created an information system of the federal level 2 years ago. it is a cloud information system. why am i focusing on this matter, because for this information system it is non-departmental, but all types of control supervision. all departments are connected and all checks from the beginning from the start of the check to its end. in this information system is fixed and without reflection in the information system can not be carried out. that is, we see all the checks , not only those that have not been carried out. well the deadline for the audit, the reason for the appointment, the result of the audit, the identified violations, and so on and so forth and so on, and the departments have no opportunity not to tweak, change, or correct any information in this system. it is also important to note, uh, that this information system is integrated with

the information system of the prosecutor general's office of the prosecutor general's office. he sees absolutely everything that happens in our sphere of control and supervision, and the third direction is feedback. mm under feedback what we understand? we are well aware that no matter how perfect the check is, no matter how ideal the rules. she didn't pass. eh, an audit is always such an eternal search for a balance of interests between the state and business, and in order to create an environment of trust, business should have a simple, understandable form of appeal, in any way related to the audit, so we launched a system of mandatory pre-trial appeal, and it is launched on portal of public services literally by clicking. there two keys on the keyboard you can file a complaint, which in a mandatory e, mode will be considered by law, a twenty-day period for consideration of this complaint is set, and all complaints are recorded in a single

system. we see from beginning to end. who reviews how? what terms, by the way for today. we have an average complaint handling time there, a little over 11 days. with the legislative deadline of 20 days, even on the main screen of the department, we have displayed such a kind of internal competition in meeting these deadlines. uh, handling complaints we undoubtedly. er, focusing on quality too, so that they understand about the use of this information system. it is connected to 31 federal departments, 1,300 regional and 2,500 municipal electricity supervisory departments. that is, this is such a common integrated system in which we understand what is happening through feedback and consider each complaint last year we had a. just over 3,000 complaints have been filed. well , a third of the complaints are satisfied. we acknowledged the fact that a, as a result of the verification, were

some violations and these checks have been corrected. the next important point is the moratorium on verification. we are well aware that there are different attitudes towards the moratorium, but the decision was made last year and, uh, march 10 last year. ah, as part of the counter-sanctions package, the president decided to impose a moratorium on the verification. it was immediately introduced, given that we have all the checks, as i have already said, digitized and reflected in the information system. we applied the moratorium just instantly, because that in the information system we immediately suspended the initiated checks. well, and accordingly, those checks that were planned were canceled, as far as they are concerned. e what about? control over compliance with the moratorium is something, and control is carried out from two sides and in fact. uh, this control is actually such with 100 % coverage today, but relatively technical why

is the nose with 100% result and understanding of what is happening in the internal moratorium, because on the one hand we immediately launched on the public services portal in pre-trial appeal section is a separate tab. this opportunity to complain about non-compliance with the moratorium restored the daily period of 24 hours for consideration of such appeals. by the way, last year there were a little less than 100, to be exact 98 and six times. we corrected ourselves within 24 hours, i mean the oversights, recognizing that well , some violations were committed and within 24 hours we, immediately, in the event of an appeal, consider it. wherein. uh, reverse side of the moratorium enforcement medal. we in the information system we see all the reasons for the appointment of inspections and e, naturally with e, we compare it with the standards of the moratorium. and accordingly, these three areas of work in these three areas. e gave the following result. if we compare

again, going back to the nineteenth year, which we consider to be a kind of reference point, then questions are often asked or comparisons are often made primarily with the number of checks. although i'm there internally, for example, i do not consider the number of checks. this is such a reference or ideal indicator, but all the same, so that we understand with us in the nineteenth year. overall, there were just over one and a half million inspections carried out last year. we have carried out 339.000 checks. that is , in fact, we have almost five times the number of checks. eh, it was reduced at the same time, eh, in my opinion. it is important to note the following here, that if in the nineteenth year we collected this number of checks carried out there in the plates, categorized requests, and , uh, added up all this information, then today all these 339,000 checks are reflected in our information. system and we are in

we understand in real time, on what date, where and how many checks are being carried out. uh, the second uh, the number of types of control has decreased, we have seriously reduced the number of u types of control, somewhere on a larger scale, somewhere we have removed the redundant ones or updated the existing one, and if we had 250 types of control, then today it is 141 types of uh control а-а, 101 federal 33 regional and seven municipal and it is also important to understand that in the current conditions, when we move to a risk-oriented model of control and supervision, we have strengthened e, the emphasis is on prevention, and prevention is actually a kind of advisory action on the part of the state, when we see that some norm or some rule is not observed in our country. uh, regulatory authorities come out without

fines and sanctions. explains what's wrong? why did they come? what needs to be corrected and what needs to be corrected, and we have, uh, the number of preventive visits this year, uh , is more than the number of direct verification activities. also here, it's probably important to note that e accent we're in we do preventive measures in the social sphere and in institutions providing social services. another important point about the number of inspections and, uh, reducing the administrative burden on businesses. so i announced the figure of 339,000 checks. here, too , it is important to understand that out of this figure there are 339,000 checks, and more than half. this is not a business check. we have 3 million in the register of legal entities. a little more than 3 million, 10,000 organizations and 3,600,000 individual entrepreneurs.

it turns out, well, there are about six million 800.000 subjects. and when they say that let’s put things in order there, uh, we’ll put things in order there by inspections ; the meaning of verification is absolutely not the meaning of verification. and this is only as a measure. when it is impossible to put things in order in another way and you need to treat business in an appropriate way, you need to create such an environment. well, such a regulation, in which it would simply not be profitable not to comply with the rules and norms, with regard to monitoring the check for screen. yes, you see, and uh, we have a fifth of the inspections, about 20% - these are, uh, construction projects that are before the water is put into operation. naturally. we come to see. uh, a third of the inspections are the social sphere, the children's season. it's educational season. well, this is a public institution, but only everything else we have falls under the category of, uh,

business. here, once again, we focus our attention so that, uh, they understand our position. we are not chasing the number of careers. we are not in one direction or the other. we're chasing the creation of a correct regulatory environment, in which the rules do not comply with the current norms, would not be beneficial. fourth, as for the results in some monetary equivalent, we asked a special business to evaluate how much the changes in the regulation are. uh, simplifying digitalization verification procedures, these are the measures that i just described, as far as, uh, everything. this resulted in a reduction in business costs. the business itself estimates annual savings of about 200 billion rubles. 200 billion rubles business saves per year in fact, only on the fact that we put things in order in the regulatory uh. uh, current legislation. this is also an important moment when they say that there are some

bills or something. here are the qualitative requirements, including, by the way , on the platform of the state duma in the committees. and i am in favor of making these demands, because the number of laws. maybe in the moment there , this effect does not see, but if you look long on the horizon. here, as such an illustration or an example when there is high-quality regulators, when they worked out well. this is the effect over the years, in fact, that we get precisely in the fact, or primarily from legislative activity , from the fact that we have well-developed norms and rules, and fifth, as for the moratorium, business, by the way, separately considers it only from the moratorium, that the annual savings are about 80 billion per year, but at the same time, i draw attention to the fact that the risk-oriented approach to the purpose of the project remains even within the moratorium, so consider a moratorium, as a black and white situation in which it is impossible to check all the time and let's cancel and check all the time , it is not so necessary a system in which it will be clear

when a check is scheduled and why it is assigned. sixth sixth feedback pre-trial appeal system, i will honestly say that i myself file complaints on my own . well, i mean in the information system just so that colleagues do not relax. they're so tense all the time, but uh, but uh in terms of understanding how the system works. e we we are really doing this, and i have already said that we ourselves have an average period for considering a complaint of 11 days, there the answer will give a response country. naturally, there is a little bit different, but i'm voicing the average for you. here we are in the twenty- second year. i said it was filed, a little over three. eh, a third of the complaints we e recognized e, satisfied and satisfied in favor of the applicant, that is, we canceled our decisions. it is the most important tool we work with. and most importantly, through feedback through complaints. we understand on

what to complain. why do they complain and this is a task setting for us in order to work it out. either procedures, or rules, well, either some form of oversight control, well, or in the end, if we see that this is a human factor. yes, it is also repetitive, well, then we are dealing with the human factor. ah. well, the sixth. uh, once again i emphasize this as a result , this is the regulation and the rules, these are the most important two laws. this is an adjustment. here's the circle. e of all related legislation, which in one way or another e establishes the rules associated with both federal and regional municipal supervision to date. we have brought all this into uniformity, and we work within the common legal framework. what, well, we inherited it, as they say , we got it in this form, but after working it out and doing it in this mode. it just becomes manageable today, when any decision, if something needs to be corrected, is taken by me, and it immediately applies to all, controlled

supervision. they are as if before, that in each case we have some kind of subjective decision. and uh, after such and such a number of decisions , it becomes very, very difficult to control this situation. and what about the ending? what's next? well, our main task today is the final transition to control and supervision on a risk-based approach. eh, this is the most important element. uh, this is an element that changes the entire system of control and supervision. uh, this means that the verification is carried out. hmm, only where there is a risk of violating the law and in another way. it is impossible to prevent violation of the law. that is, with the introduction of this system, we must finally reach such a spot check exactly where they violate, where we think they violate

or not where we think, maybe someday we will violate, because when we we don’t get caught with a check when we don’t explain why we come to check this environment of trust, not that we reset it to zero there, and not within the framework of this check, but in general throughout the entire control system. oversight what such risk-oriented control supervision, if in a simple way, it is a set of indicators , a set of information that characterizes or indicates that there is a violation of the current legislation somewhere. well , this does not mean that you already have to run to appoint a check. this means that a check on the appointment is only possible if it is impossible to correct this violation in another way, because we must understand that for the same business and we, by the way, made sociology. uh, 60% of businesses are against no audits. they are well aware that the task states to make the same competitive environment. and if someone violates, then this is not

fair competition and as a tool to protect against unfair competition. business sees, among other things , the function of control of the supervisory state. here it is important to manage this function correctly and in parallel with it. and to work on the second important point in terms of indicators of the risk-based approach, uh, is that these indicators should be public in public, thus the business understands when they come to check. if some indicators do not work. we discuss them with the business, these indicators are corrected, because it does not always work out. so the rules are perfect, and business all the time. here is such a second takes them and violates. e. understand when everything is digitized, when we see the results of checks, when we see the reasons for the appointment of a check, when we see indicators and realizing that the same norm is violated all the time. this is often the norm. and thus we correct this norm, correcting some kind of regulator.