vladimir putin today, in an interview with my colleague paulo zarubin, made a number of important statements following the results of the nato summit vilnius, listen, there, of course, it is difficult to understand, they promise

ukraine nato membership, they do not promise. or is it just called the transfer of something looming, but still some kind of easier path is supposedly promised, in addition to this, the big seven adopted a declaration on certain guarantees for the security of ukraine and states that ukraine will be supported only as long as this quote is required paris starts supply long-range missiles, you can appreciate. how serious is this threat to the security of russia and ukraine, too. with regard to ukraine's membership in nato, we have repeatedly spoken about this. this poses a threat to russia's security , obviously, and in fact, uh, the reason and uh for a special military operation. one of the reasons is the threat of ukraine joining nato , i am sure that this will not increase the security of ukraine itself yes, and in general u will make the world much more vulnerable uh and will lead to

additional tension on international it is the international scene. and therefore no good. i don't see it. our positions are well known and long formulated. well, with regard to the supply of weapons of various weapons, we see. and how many hopes were placed on the supply of a sufficiently long-range missile? radius of action, well, yes, they do not cause damage, but nothing critical in the zone does not occur with the use of these missiles at sh. e. hmm same tanks. e foreign-made combat and vehicles and infantry us last night. ah, tanks. from the fourth - only the fourth you 311 units were destroyed, of which a large part. i think one third is at least western made, including leopard. uh, i can tell you that hmm ukrainian servicemen, a often

refuse to even get into these tanks. why because they are a priority target for our guys are destroyed in the first place on the battlefield. and this is an unpleasant circumstance, which in general does not interfere. even use them, but they burn just like everyone else. even better than the rest of the soviet production known t-72, uh, here, therefore, in terms of changing the possible change on the battlefield, hmm will not do anything. uh, a new supply of new weapons will only aggravate the situation. uh, and worse for the ukrainian side. uh, and uh, will foment further conflict if someone is interested in it, and, apparently there are such restants, then this is the best way to accomplish this task. foment conflict

further delivers a new expression now about security. we have already said many times that any country has the right to ensure its security, of course, she has the right to choose. e, that way of achieving this goal, which considers the most correct for itself. there is only one limitation, it is related to the fact that e achieves the security of one side should not create a threat to another country , so we proceed from the understanding that this principle, which has been repeatedly declared in various international documents. it will still be taken into account for a, ukraine, of course, has the right to ensure its security. by the way, speaking, here e in that, but the draft document, about which i have already

i recalled it repeatedly, namely, in the draft agreement between russia and hmm ukraine, which was, uh, prepared in istanbul and which were then thrown into uh, trash cans, uh by the ukrainian regime, and in this project , the issues of ensuring the security of ukraine were set out in great detail, we still needed think, according to whether we agree with everything that was stated there, well, in general yes, in general, uh, i think that this document was acceptable, so there is nothing unusual for us. e in what has now been declared about her it is necessary there and in the seven, and we are not against discussing issues of this kind. well, i repeat once again under a mandatory condition. ensuring the security of the russian federation the president also answered a question about the grain deal, which was asked by andrey kolesnikov . you can ask, they say that the grain deal is under threat. and that

some of the conditions of the russian federation regarding our exports are not being met. and what, mr. erdogan , to her, what to tell you about this in a personal meeting? and that you received a letter? can you shed some light on this from the un? well of course, and that there are no secrets here? no, the fact is that this deal was originally justified. uh, it's a general, like, uh, deal aimed primarily and mainly at helping the poorest parts of the world so that they allow famine there. um, i want to emphasize once again that the rise in food prices for foodstuffs for what e agriculture produces in the whole world and for fertilizers is not associated with a special war operation. it is associated with the mistakes of the leading western economies in e, in

the field of finance and e, c. uh, in the field of investment, because uh, including in the energy sector well, for many, many years , they neglected the basic principles of energy development, got carried away, did not pay due attention to alternative energy sources oil and gas sector. some countries have abandoned nuclear energy. well, here is the result. uh, the result is the opposite of what is expected in the energy sector. still climbed up. uh investment investment in due time. they are not made deficits. there began to be created. well , not now, but in general a threat. on the e-e of these deficits due to the fact that investment - it is not in the industry, but it has arisen and prices have arisen in the area. eh, in the sphere. eh, finance,

has also repeatedly spoken about this. these are known things. uh, they just prefer not to talk about it, because this is an obvious puncture in the economic policy of western countries. and what i mean is, uh, in the fight against the coronavirus pandemic . yes, they began to support the games of citizens and certain sectors of the economy. we are this too we did, but we did it in a reasonable size, but there they didn’t print a huge amount of money, they started burning with a shovel of food in their country from the world market and put the poorest countries in a very difficult situation. well, i mean first, uh, special operation. they decided to blame everything on russia, uh, what is called from a sick head to a healthy one, we have absolutely nothing to do with it? yes, sure. oh, oh, using, uh, as a tool to compete against sanctions, they used these tools to aggravate the situation on world markets

food energy, but we did not exacerbate, but they did by their actions. this, uh, led to this result. uh, so the so-called grain deal was not justified by the desire to support the poorest countries. well, i have already said many times, of the total volume of food exported from the territory , primarily grain , three and a half percent were identified from the territory of ukraine. only went to the poorest countries in the world. only now a little more than a percentage of everything else in a well-fed and prosperous europe, but uh, many european countries have begun to abandon ukrainian cereals. it means that they started to discriminate against ukrainian grain, not us, as for the conditions on which we agreed to ensure the safety and export of ukrainian grain, yes, there were. uh, the clauses of this uh are agreements. he uh, according to which it

was necessary to take into account russian interests. this is logistics. this is insurance. this is hmm the movement of money associated with paying for our products. hmm many other things. nothing i want to emphasize is nothing at all has been done. everything is playful. no gate no single point connected with e with the fact that e is the interests of the russian federation are not fulfilled. despite this, we voluntarily extended this so-called repeatedly. well listen, well enough, in the end. er, that's why we're now being told no. you now once again agree to the extension. but we will keep our promises to you. well, let's think, there are a few more days. we

will think about how to proceed. but if we are told that e will fulfill what we have been promised. by the way, spelled out including hmm with the un and i know that the secretary general and the staff of the united nations who are dealing with this issue. they sincerely strive to fulfill the relevant conditions, including in relation to russia. here and now i have no doubts, but they are not succeeding, but because the western countries are not going to fulfill these promises. well, as one of the options not first extension, and then the fulfillment of a promise. and first to fulfill the promise, and then our participation, which means we can suspend our participation in this transaction, if everyone once again says that all the promises given to us will be fulfilled. well, let's keep that promise, and we'll uh, join this truth again right away. in

this regard, maybe, uh, maybe connect to swift rosselkhozbank yes one of the conditions. although this is one of the conditions. there are also money transfers. well, yes, it does matter. there is the logistics of port calls, our foreign ships and so on. there, of course, i did not see this new thing, but we are in contact with the organization's employees. i will repeat. again they sincerely want the western countries to fulfill their obligations. well, so far nothing has been working out for them, and i will repeat to us, once again they say to extend it again, you can do so, we extended it. exactly at the moment when the promised july will be fulfilled, the deal expires. how long are we willing to wait. and

here is what they will do. only how many will be required in order to fulfill the data given to us necessarily given to us promised. guys, start doing it, otherwise it won't do anything, but at the same time, this is a question that worried the journalists, but they had nothing to do with this forum, which was held and attended by vladimirovich putin. it was a forum of future technologies. i looked at the panel session, i liked that young guys are sitting. i understand, it seems like every single word that they utter separately, but together i somehow don’t get a single picture. it's just that this is a very specific field of knowledge, but the enthusiasm with which the guys spoke, of course, could not but please me. but that's what vladimir said vladimirovich that's the fact that we are achieving our goals, it seems to me that it is very important that we set ourselves the feasible tasks that are necessary for our country and

we are moving towards them confidently and, as i said, we are achieving results. we really faced pressure to force us to give up sovereignty from the right to choose our own historical path through restrictions on access to technology , our opponents expected that we would back down, give up, but so and uh. well, it won't, as we often say, in such cases russia will only move forward, moreover, in its own way, without isolating there is no one . in fact, we are talking about a system that forms the infrastructure for our further development for the future of our economy as a whole. and it is obvious that dependence in this area means serious threats to national security, weakening, and even loss of the country's sovereignty. we must

certainly think about this and look into the future, we will say that this is exactly what we were striving for. some countries, when a loved one tried to literally hoist our country to foreign technology platforms. standards. it is not necessary to recognize not without success, it is clear that interdependence. she is inevitable. it is clear that this is interdependence. it's an objective thing, but still er between the general general words o er about openness and er, own shirts of one's own shirt, which is closer to the body. there is a difference and we often practice this difference. we have seen many critical technologies in this area. we bought what is called in a strange store of a kind in a supermarket ready for someone to make decisions, and in at some point in front of us they simply closed the door tightly and hung the search closed. we

have learned the lessons and drawn the necessary conclusions. by the way, there are mega grants promised to scientists , that is, such active attention, just what dmitry loves and there was talk about chips, that is , i don’t know what it is about everything and about quantum ones. well sounds wonderful quantum computers. i mean, it's all great. that is, it is good that young eyes are burning, or they are doing it. that's how eyes burn smileyden, yes, two presidents, and here's biden jokes about finlandization. from the east, that he wanted to finlandize nato and got finland and then he repeats back to the journalist. do you

repeat? i see it crawling on the news they said joep biden in the oval office yelling and yelling swearing chasing people away and going into a real frenzy anger is understandable that all of us, of course, can lose our temper, but in this case, everything is so neglected, that according to media reports, people generally do not want to go to the oval office, of their own free will. look, i'm not a doctor, but one of the signs dementia, when people have terrible terrible fits of anger, this old fool, like with cards of clues, constantly misunderstands falling down stairs, but no one

has ever dared to say that joe biden has dementia. i will tell all of you that this information has become the last piece of the puzzle. in general, the westerners have not lost anything at all. suddenly race mp, bundestag and so on. the following three myths the first myth of nato is a defensive alliance, but wasn’t nato, in violation of international law, waging war against yugoslav civilians, tv channels and chinese embassy. the war in afghanistan for 20 years with the death of hundreds of thousands of civilians and war crimes. is all

this called the defense of democracy and law? this is already a historically established outright lie. suffice it to recall nato member portugal with the fascist regime of salazar, its cruel colonial wars in africa in recent years alone, the illegal wars of the united states and its allies have claimed the lives of four point five million people. is this what resorting to international law looks like? the third myth nato defends human rights continue to torture prisoners, and journalist julian assange faces 175 years in prison in the us for

publicizing war crimes committed by nato on behalf of the us ladies and gentlemen, the truth is that whoever is not a member of nato, he participated in the war the alliance is aimed at expansion and trampling on international law and human rights. the results - this is shown by the one who is a member of nato loses his democratic sovereignty, since the united states is always a gigabanist conductor of his interests and one who is a member of nato sacrifices the social security of its population by pursuing a large-scale policy of building up armaments. every fifth child in our country today is poor, and the german military budget is growing and growing is a shame, so the couple cancel this murderous military pact. after 78 years, it's time for the united states to withdraw its troops, including nuclear weapons from

germany. exactly what kind of absinthe party to them, so on, such a performance. i like her many times. i'll explode, well, i'll say that it's good, firstly, at least someone says let the left. let it be right and it doesn’t matter, but at least someone in europe and, first of all, in germany, says that europe and again , first of all, germany, are going full steam ahead with a big european war, and the consequences of which are very difficult to predict at the moment, yes, but after all, the first world war ii yes, the second began precisely as a big war and everyone understood that it was a big one. and the first you, after all, began with a phrase. we will be home before christmas and, in my opinion,

this phrase is in my head, but they turn it very often all sorts of european politicians. we will quickly decide everything now, and now everything will be decided in a couple of weeks, and then and then such a deep remarkovism begins, but without remarque, uh, after all, i will say one more thing about the forum of new technologies and the speech of vladimir vladimirovich and in general the presence of the president. after all, one must understand that and the president is now in a very busy schedule, because, uh, the so -called offensive on the zone of his own by nato pro-nato forces continues, and nevertheless. i generally, so to speak, the situation very difficult, and yet the president takes the time to talk to the youth , look and listen, what they say,

look at them. and this is very important. why because, well, to be honest, well, to be honest. we are the first time fighting for new technological standards. and the world of multipolarity the world of macro-regions is also, including the world, and the competition of various those standards, i didn’t invent it, so it’s already some kind. well, it's almost a platitude, but anyway, so here's the first round. we are practically lost. we practically lost at the moment when we decided that, nevertheless, in spite of everything, we will replace everything through alternative imports. here it is, in my opinion, ours was saved in many ways by the idiotic position of the european union in general by westerners. they blocked everything for us and forced us to move on our own and the fact that we have young people who are ready with burning eyes. sometimes

enthusiasm can be harmful, but not now and not here to move, but really technological solutions. hmm no, it's very worth it. especially if it's uh be accompanied by very serious thoughtful anti-corruption measures, because enthusiasm minus the fight against corruption. yes, this is equal to a disaster, and enthusiasm plus the fight against corruption equals industrialization. new in my opinion. well, this is my formula. this is my value judgment, now two things concerning, but the general international situation. which is closer to me. well, first of all, i watch the consequences very carefully. this one. as you say yourself, but in vilnius, in my opinion, it's more like a carnival, so i have hmm a and absolute the feeling that the kiev regime.

now they are considering the issue very seriously, and the organizations are very large-scale provocations, including with weapons of mass destruction or with nuclear materials or some chemical things, because of the situation in which they found themselves and which was demonstrated to everyone. they have no way out. and by the way, there was one such phrase said by someone. i don’t remember now from the kiev regime they gave us time until november. so no, the time until november did not give kyiv time until november, the americans took over the preparation of an alternative regime, and therefore this regime, which can go away or what is called burn. burning everything behind itself, or into complete

non-existence. here he will fight to the last. he is absolutely ready to arrange any provocations without restrictions. we must take this very seriously. i just don't see, to be honest, they have a different one. it ’s precisely near kiev that the americans see, but near kiev i don’t see a strong step, except for a big provocation, provocations that will overshadow everything defeat theft. all hmm the second moment. probably, uh, i'll surprise you, and probably dmitry olegovich will not agree with me, but i would pay attention to the affair with cocaine in the white house. yes, here's laughter with laughter, but if you follow the classical logic of the behavior of the american politician of the times, then biden's grandfather, and a week, as history should have been buried. and she's already alive. all. no. no,

services. she said she went and asked. i don't know if the battery in the camera is dead. this is all the way it should be so secret, american and sings oh-oh-oh, well, it's very likely. they know that the service happened there on a non- applicable russian method. the honor of the queen is more important, how much

more important is the guards of the same queen in honor of the british queen yourself, right? it was the sea. cocaine says yes or zelensky says it's clear it was my stash. it's my fault. no, by the way, this is a good option, but here you are answering this question yourself. history should have died, not dying. and in my opinion around this story begins. don't i want to call it the political process is so, but a certain apparatus is a hardware rotation. uh, in the course of which you can with me that you do not argue no, in this no people happened. that's exactly the hardware rotation, in the course of which a lot of interesting things can come up and i think that they will.

the kid, where he dressed up. he went for a pension. this is my grandfather vasily pavlovich safonov , major

of the airborne forces. god bless america . for what was left for each, maybe in the store for five to 10 rounds, i will mercilessly beat that we have survived, indeed, this is an army.