hello on the air international review in the studio of fyodor lukyanov today in the program international review events of the week of chronicles facts comments nato's key summit in lithuania ukraine was asked to wait for the materials of our program. guarantees of military security on which israel's military power is based plot from the scene stages of the evolution of the military bloc from yugoslavia to afghanistan the first operation abroad the transition from the cold war from explosive confrontations between the two worlds to detente was associated forces on the world stage, but it took

a lot of effort for people, and especially those who direct the policies of states, to become accustomed to the idea that it is natural not to balance on the brink of war. a negotiations on controversial issues. not balancing on the brink of war, but negotiations on controversial issues, not confrontation, but peaceful cooperation, golden words were spoken by leonid ilyich brezhnev in his report to the 25th congress of the cpsu in february 1976. and it is still relevant in vilnius that the nato summit was held , which was very much awaited, especially in kiev stockholm, the ukrainian capital expected to receive an official invitation to the swedish alliance to stand up, and finally its full

member did not happen. ukraine retained the status of a partner without legalized relations. and sweden darova on the turkish mercy. well, in the fall, if nothing happens. the meaning of the meeting is not in these specific subjects, although they attracted attention, more important than what brezhnev spoke about almost half a century ago, understanding what the alliance’s course is aimed at cementing confrontation or finding ways to make it more flexible and manageable, but first things first. slovak marian kamensky and his work titled vicious circle on signposts written by nato a long way to membership of a military alliance, the conservative, british times, and her peter bruce. the inscription reads welcome to nato two large letters form english no or not, the german cartoonist

burkhartmore drawing is called running man on the umbrella written note extremely expressive work of the magician erdogan everything is honest without cheating oliver shov from austria about entry into the alliance of sweden although its prospects are not up to the end and not dreams. but pollokaleria does not even doubt that sweden will be in nato, because on her side, the strongest girl in the world longstocking is a character in the novel of the same name by the swedish writer. austria blades in hand. she has a man who looks like erdogan. and now grandfather is louder, papil says so that everyone can hear. the ukrainian leadership used all media and political opportunities to convince western public opinion not to invite nato to kiev, but the decision

23 years reproduces the results of the summit in bucharest 15 years ago in the spring of 2008, then the us administration demanded that the allies begin the official procedure for joining the alliance of georgia and ukraine, approving for them an action plan for membership and, in other words , a road map for joining the bloc. berlin lay down, paris is impossible, they say russia was given to provoke subjugations. but in the memorandum of the meeting, they wrote that georgia , ukraine will be nato members someday later, but georgia has definitely lagged behind since then, but for ukraine in vilnius, deja vu by completion. we don’t have to take it like that later, when the conditions are ripe, but by all means. why in 2008 the european giants were against the rapprochement of the former allied republics of nato we asked the wonderful diplomat alexander

alekseevich avdeev he was then the russian ambassador in paris france was enough at that time. post-shirakovskaya still sarcasm came into force. he just got elected. uh, the foreign ministry was still set in an inorganic spirit, there were uh interesting ideas and illusions of good relations with russia uh. true, sarkozy already at that time advocated the return of the nato military organization but nevertheless the french hesitated. i don't know exactly what was going on in berlin but i think uh the german chancellor who was elected 2 years before. there were the same fluctuations. although 15 years is an insignificant period by historical standards, that mood seems almost unbelievable

. there were still many hopes for the further development of relations between the alliances and russia. do you remember, huh? sarkozy even came to moscow on the eve of the elections. it was 2007, although vladimir vladimirovich did not accept it, but other leaders did, and then there were good assurances that the main priority in european politics would be given to the development of partnerships and special ties with russia with sarkozy repeated shirak's phrases, although he acted on -other. well, ukraine at that time was a little bit different, there were hmm hopes for resolving the main contradictions between russia and ukraine , and so on, and the flexible french. the flexible french

of that period understood that they could spoil the game if they are ahead of schedule not deserved, e contrary to the criteria. uh, they will speak out for the reception of ukraine, we talked about different things, we will continue in the following programs. in the meantime, about an interesting change in 2008 , germany and france opposed ukraine's entry into nato, but they pushed the united states now france for germany is still against the americans already on its side. why divulged shift up? this is an attempt to move away from the deep pacifism of german political culture, but the germans are still very careful and do not want to force. americans have a difference between the bush administration in 2008 and the current biden is a matter of domestic political culture. bush was the apotheosis of neo-conservatism and the desire to change the world now, none of

the us parties has such ambitious plans, the political climate. in america , the climate has changed, of course, it has changed, but the refusal is not the final majority, the country of the alliance, but the chief of the pentagon loyd. austin even says that everyone wants kiev there, in the end to see so will ukraine in nato it seems that not soon, but at least a is uh, significantly fears from the us and other allies about the entry. uh, he thinks ukraine has more to do. and of course, and he pays that at the time when the war is going on in the territory, because if this is so, then there is a danger that the us

is russia and its allies. when they start talking about the criteria and reforms, the mood of the candidates deteriorates, and ukraine, in its position, considers such insinuations simply insulting. what specific reforms mean is not yet clear, it will become clear, well, over time, i would say, but the fact is that despite the fact that there are such allies as the ears of resources, a first of all, but nato still considers itself, uh, the union of democratic a and i once had some.

and how to say weaknesses and regions of russia and, uh, since then, uh, no serious changes, so serious reforms in the field of organization are worth it. it seems that now only democratization was not enough, anyway, ukraine's path to nato is not destined. although there were countries in the history of the alliance that traveled by thermal paths. wwii türkiye formally remained neutral, but supplied germany with chromium ore and other strategic raw materials back in forty-third at the tehran conference, churchill stalin and roosevelt discussed the issue of turkey joining the anti-hitler coalition . churchill also said that he would not object to the access of soviet ships to the warm seas. he believed that turkey would contain the soviet union in the south. as a result , turkey broke off trade relations with germany and on february 45 declared

war on her after the end of hostilities. stalin raised the issue of the bosphorus and dartanals before turkey. he believed that the soviet union should gain control over them, and also recalled the territories of the transcaucasian republics, some of which went to turkey after the first world president of turkey and death and nude refused and asked for help. the united states and great britain, in order to prove their adherence to atlanticism, ankara sent a rather significant contingent to korea to fight the communists. so in the fifty-second turkey became a member of nato the federal republic of germany joined the alliance 3 years later in the forty-ninth three zones of occupation. the british french and american were united in one of them and the frg was created by the frg, the main obstacle to its entry into nato was the decision to demilitarize germany, the road to joining

the north atlantic alliance was opened by the paris agreements of the fifty-fourth year between the frg and the usa, great britain and france, in which the last three refused status as occupying powers, but retained partial control of the german army on may 6, 55 after the ratification of the paris agreement , germany's instagram became full. a month later, the bundeswehr was founded by members of the alliance and the federal ministry of defense was created, the issue of germany's participation in nato was again raised in 1990 on the eve of the unification bon and his allies feared that the ussr would demand the neutral status of a united germany. however , the soviet leadership, headed by mikhail gorbachev, did not object to further participation in the wg in the alliance, spain joined nato in may-82 only after the death of franco in march 86 under the rule of the socialists in

the country passed a historic referendum to remain in nato or not, most of the population voted in favor but it was decided not to enter the joint military structure at home, spain began to participate in the work of all political institutions of nato and was even given an observer position in the armed nuclear planning group. the forces were under the control of the national command, everything changed only in the ninety-sixth parliament gave the go-ahead to participate in military structures. only when, after the insek rope, took over, the former spanish foreign minister javier salon for a long time a member of the socialist party and previously an opponent of joining the alliance. did the light converge on nato look at the military financial assistance provided to ukraine by members of the alliance and did not

dream of israeli guarantees for ukraine shortly before vilnius. israel is not included in any blocs, but is directly connected with the united states. maybe this is some new concept, israeli guarantees, probably implied. something like oral assurances that in the event of a crisis, assistance will be provided. what specific supply weapons or direct american involvement? i don't know, to be honest, that nothing written in any agreement at the moment of aggravation is nothing more than a subject of negotiations. do not forget that the promise contained in the budapest memorandum, signed in exchange for ukraine's refusal of nuclear weapons on the territory of the country, is little worth any agreements that are not backed by military success remain on paper. unfortunately us secretary of state james baker has said twice that nato will not go east, in

fact. this was a condition for the withdrawal of the soviet troops from germany, although the agreements were oral and baker said that he meant only germany. although the final communiqué spoke of eastern europe as a whole against the backdrop of the end of the cold war. no one betrayed this meaning more important then it seemed, the treaty on conventional armed forces in europe in artillery tanks. combat aircraft of the country , the participants in this complex document were deprived of the opportunity to conduct large-scale combat operations in europe, many experts began to call it the cornerstone of the european security, but in the ninety-fourth year after the collapse of the ussr, when the clinton administration gave the green light to nato expansion, its tasks were not fulfilled, some members of the alliance did not join the treaty. and many did not even ratify it as a compromise was signed. h-asserting act , russia nato however, this did not prevent the alliance

from expanding in 2004, when it included seven states at once and raised the issue of accepting its composition of the former soviet republics. fu, but still, what guarantees does israel have from the united states vgtrk correspondent sergei pashkov found out on the spot? the israel defense forces is the most powerful king and will be capable of this reputation in the middle east in the 75 years since the establishment of the jewish state. she earned in five short and fierce wars with arab neighbors and in countless army operations in the gas sector and on the west bank of the jordan river, minimal losses, maximum air defense effect, reliably enough, protecting civilian objects. in the days of the shelling, the last time the inhabitants of israel felt it was last spring, when the drones of the king

one after the other, they eliminated a dozen high-ranking commanders of the islamic jihad in gaza. at the same time, no one here doubts that the most important source of all this power, money and technology , which washington has been supplying to the israelis for 70 years , the first element is the sale and supply of weapons of the most advanced and most technological first of all, to the state, israel, moreover, in many developments of the latest weapons in the united states america is actively involved, israel since many developments, many components of many technologies. uh, they uh, are invented and produced in israel by the first agreement on military and financial assistance to the zenhower administration.

she concluded with tel aviv back in 1952, when the middle east became the arena of external political confrontation between the soviet union and the united states; since then, military support from overseas has become the most important element of israel's national security over the past 70 years at the expense of american taxpayers. israel managed to create the most powerful armored forces in the middle east, stuffed with the most modern electronics. aviation of the new generation and the already legendary systems about the iron dome received $ 150 billion, israel has received technology from the united states for armament of technology over the years , squadrons have been purchased with washington’s money, the latest f-35s are being developed anti-missile systems of the seventy-sixth year, israel has embarked on a rapprochement with egypt after a bloody war. doomsday begins to receive ongoing funding from pentagon today. that's almost $4 billion

a year. washington is closely watching to ensure that israel outnumbers its neighbors in the quantity of the former quality of weapons. however, all this directly depends on the momentary relations of strategic partners, if the next israeli government. suddenly , washington starts to annoy, he can turn on the tap at any time. because there is no single global collateral agreement. israel's security poke does not exist, despite the fact that there is no formal agreement on mutual guarantees security. there are a large number of declarations of memos made on behalf of the president on behalf of the senate of the congress and which say that america considers israel a very close ally in the middle east and will do everything necessary and in order to support it, uh, combat capability and uh -e economic stability, even the system of military technical cooperation between the united states and

israel was formed over decades , the agreement was adjusted to the regional geopolitical situation. this system relies on dozens of government agreements, memorandums of direct contracts with suppliers and arms manufacturers , it is impossible to copy it, and when promising to reproduce israeli guarantees for ukraine, joe biden most likely did not mean deliveries. armament here, kiev has long abandoned, israel is far behind, the head of the white house probably had in mind another nato undertakes to enter the war. if this decision is accepted by all countries, if one of them is attacked, nato countries are obliged to protect each other. in our case, there is no such does not undertake to join the war for us, knowing the cocky nature of the ally, watching the sharp changes in political course. when the us government changes, in principle , israel does not sign a treaty on

a defensive alliance, american pilots and marines do not cover heaven and earth, israel on its territory. no american military bases in critical situations should rely on their own forces sergey pashkov anastasia denis especially for international review, israel as you can see, israel relies primarily on itself, and it is understandable was the experience different? for a long time it was believed that in the six-day arab-israeli war, israel reacted to a potential threat, however, in our days, thanks to new research, it has become. it is known that the egyptians and syrians were not going to attack the mobilization in the area of ​​the soviet canal or other actions of the arab states gave israel the impression that it was in danger as a result, tel aviv, without even warning the main ally of the united states, began a preventive

war, a few days captured the silnaz peninsula gaza strip west bank of the river jordan east jerusalem and the syrian dutch heights in the united states supported, israel even despite the erroneous attack by the israelis of the american reconnaissance ship liverty, it was not sunk, but in the cellar the american sailors, the israelis apologized and paid compensation. well, they were given a stern warning if israel starts again first, washington will refuse to support it. to an ally as a result in the seventy-third year on the eve of the yom kippur war. even knowing that the attack will be. well, i don't know when there's nothing in israel could do the calculation of the arabs to attack on a religious holiday. it didn’t justify itself, just thanks to the empty roads, the israelis quickly responded. although the first strike of the egyptians was successful as a result of the counterattack, the israelis suffered heavy losses. for the first time, soviet anti-tank

missiles malyutka were used, but american conditions were met and the united states assisted an air bridge from the latest american s5 galaxy delivered american tanks in israel and made up for the losses, however, israel felt the danger, because the key condition for the victory of the thief in the israeli wars, supplies from the american military were not at all. according to american studies, the balance of power in conflicts barely falls short of the coefficient. one and two, that is, against one israeli, the arabs could not put up even two soldiers, mainly for economic reasons, although they had a much larger population, however, the conflict of 73 years showed that if the arabs set a goal, they would achieve a result before that, israel began first, except for the forty-eighth year. that is why the yom kippur war ended the resignation of defense minister moshe dayan and

the end of the prime minister's career. golden mayor, and after 6 years, israel signed the peace agreement with egypt the fifth article of the north atlantic collective security treaty has not yet been checked, but everyone understands. is there in case of force majeure. it will not work, this is the end of the bloc, so it is difficult to disown obligations within the framework of the alliance with bilateral agreements more shaky and more part. this promise means political diplomatic and economic a and military. and what congress content? uh, while they are not clear, but it rioted over time again does not depend on the level of trust. in between, in general, no one sits down that, firstly, it will continue, but the diplomatic support of such

international forms as i will give you . to the leadership of ukraine and the economic this is a continuation, but the huge financial resources that are presented in ukraine and more honest, and the military e, cooperation and investment in the modernization of a and the decisions of the military-industrial complex ukraine and so on. well, the most important thing, and it must be emphasized, is to remember, but these promises do not guarantee, but that the united states would take part in a military conflict. e y against someone it's only a promise, and

very often for what at first already makes in time they are superfluous, and not personal canty. everyone talks about the risks that nato will take by adopting a real strategy for a country in military conflict with russia, look further. ukraine, of course, is very dependent on western weapons, however, its ability to fight is still due to her own circumstances. they are fighting with western weapons, but for myself i would say that i would have to benefit from ukrainian membership , because today ukraine has perhaps the most capable army in all of europe, let's say somewhere in europe a situation arises when collective security guarantees are demanded, according to article five of the north atlantic treaty and ukraine is not a member of nato, who can count on the german army no, so this aspect must also be borne in mind. be that as

it may, any reasoning of anatovsky ukraine's prospects are speculative is not yet known, the outcome of the current military confrontation. senseless, in my opinion, i 'll tell you this so that we have a guarantee not to enter such, well, relatively long-term, it's clear nothing works out for centuries. uh, now our military operation should end. eh, the same. well, if you want, understanding that it ended as it should, as it was in 1945? without this guarantee that they will not accept ukraine, we will not get any. after advertising about another hero of the summit and turkey, pentalgin means

against different types of pain pentalgin acts against pain, wherever it is independent of the causes of its occurrence, pentalgin will do without pain. i'm denis osin, 15 years old. i am developing a small business in alfa bank and i believe that a businessman does not exist. therefore , alfa bank and i are launching a fund of considerable business of millions of rubles. entrepreneurs across the country will receive money from the best stories. tell us about your business on alfa bank.ru. why surf the internet, if you can surf the internet lie walk about it and even

dance in it reliable mobile internet, with such at least where beeline is on your side in life, good luck. hope fills you with their lunch, the rhythm of the workers many tasks your break fills them jesus meat sytin hot with meat and noodles fills the warm sunset of the joy of life fills this juicy party of seth and riley and this challenge without alcohol rushed everyone sexual activity only in the alpha bank order a free alpha -spin the card with super cashback application and get up to 100% every month, and also 10% cashback in

supermarkets in july. in endless spaces russia has points of attraction for talents, where experience is combined with innovation, and breakthrough ideas receive comprehensive support, where russian engineers and programmers work. it is here that a new class of powerful stylish multifunctional technological media devices has been developed, the style is a new multimedia center for your home, a new word in the russian electronics. meet the delicious chocolate layer with foil. inside is beautiful the ideal plan is natural and happy. bullet