the first mine fragmentation wound is the second wound through a bullet hit in the left hand when he was still wounded. car i am now and i will try to learn how to write with my left hand. well, i completely rebuilt my life.

i drew a diagram, and we decided to bring it to life in counter-battery combat , the main one herself, change position, ulyanka, who called her daughter under 4 years old. t-90 flew on him frontal armor. this one just pierced the plate was changed and everything is there, as it were, in a combat state. so you have to take it? almost impossible lensky, holding out until the last, agreed to

the onset of the month. how many korans of sweden during this time they will still try to burn. allah alone knows, but they shook hands on the renewal of the customs union with the eu lightening the visual regime sees no more obstacles for the sale of f16 in general yes , the especially high expectations that turkey can receive for approving sweden's membership in nato were not everyone understood that the window of opportunity is limited it is impossible to endlessly break off the reception of sweden and endlessly maintain equidistance from russia and it is necessary erdogan scored points in the west, not only the swedish theme

, but also support for ukraine 's membership us. he didn't sign up. at the previous stage, she also scored points in russia at the expense of the west, as if nothing personal, and also the return of former prisoners from azov began to seem to me that the turkish leadership did not expect such moscow's negative reaction for turkey is that the transfer of these military is not so fundamentally symbolically important for ukraine and very significantly for russia, this was underestimated , perhaps erdogan will try to smooth their effect on turkish russian relations - this is a hash fund, it is wrong to jeopardize too many risky investments the entire portfolio. for the sake of one asset, in my opinion, erdogan learned how to manage

this portfolio well. the next question is the grain deal, it expires on monday, it seemed that it was already put to rest, but the topic is again revived if russia withdraws from the agreement. is it possible to continue maritime exports of ukrainian grain without her, for example, in turkish military escort, with whom i spoke here, except that turkey may try to militarily challenge russia in the black sea is very unlikely , primarily because russian-turkish relations it's a mix of different stories. first of all, syria, turkey's position there is very shaky, and they largely depend on it. from the goodwill of moscow from what russia did not want there is something to avenge, if something happens in the black sea, russia still has something to answer when turkey shot down a russian plane in 2015. ankara quickly realized that it could not oppose anything serious

to russia in the middle east or count on the support of the west there since then , the line has been implemented, i would say cooperation in the face of confrontation is the main principle, opponents should be closer than allies to consult with the latter. but no matter what conflict we are talking about or nagorno-karabakh, the question must be to deal directly with russia does not enthrall friends. russian-turkish relations have experienced more than one crisis. while there is no reason to wait for irreparable hedge funds business is bumpy, but if you get used to it it can be profitable. on july 22, 2022, in istanbul, ukraine, russia and turkey signed an agreement on the export of grain and products from ukrainian ports, and in order to prevent the supply of weapons in istanbul , the international ship inspection center was created

, another document became a memorandum, and mutual understanding between russia and the secretariat un it was supposed not to interfere, nor western countries to buy russian fertilizers and products, the agreement was valid for 120 days and was extended for the same period automatically, if there were no objections in november 2022 , it was extended for another six months, but even then difficulties arose, for example, in october, russia suspended its participation in the deal after the attack of ukrainian maritime drones on sevastopol, moscow said that a grain corridor was used for this, and the plotniks themselves were lowered from the ship of the grain carrier. the deal was considered as a program for the supply of products to the poorest countries in the world to ensure world food security, but as a result, products were received not by those who most needed it

, china became the leader in imports, followed by spain , turkey, and the fourth and fifth italy and the netherlands bangladesh with a population of 170 million people, and the grain deal received less than 10 million, israel and germany imported more grain than kenin to needy countries to her a year sugar got only 3% of all deliveries on the other hand ukrainian grain exports created problems for farmers in poland romania bulgaria hungary czech republic and slovakia grain villages in local markets and caused a sharp decline in prices. against the backdrop of rising fuel and fertilizer prices , this hit local producers. northern europe becomes a homogeneous continuous north atlantic bloc finland sweden joins iceland denmark and

norway which have long been there respectively and the baltic basin and the arctic are turning into the zone of direct contact between russia and nato moscow reminds that the joining countries are turning into legitimate targets do not make you think until now there has been no discussion on this topic, the main line that sounds in the media is this gloating that russia wanted less is needed, and now it has received more putin is upset. it's good no one asks. and what does it even mean if nato is spreading along the russian borders russia had the intention to attack finland, sweden. no such claim arises the question is especially regarding finland , which could boast the history of the most successful neutrality, but it was pointless to change. this policy to position potentially the most tense front lines, but so far the mood of hatred and resentment anger putin

since the advent of nato, the swedish leadership believed that a number of countries in the bloc would de facto provide security guarantees in the event of an attack in 1994, nato created a program of partnership for peace. the agreement gave sweden ample opportunity in 1997. sweden also became a member of the euro -atlantic partnership council, and in 2006 became part of the international security assistance force in afghanistan. active sweden in such structures went beyond the diplomatic framework, for example, during the nato operation in the line. its aircraft made more than 500-70 sorties and provided a third of intelligence information. this participation, in fact, was carried out under the full patronage of nato from the deployment of swedish aircraft at its military base in sicily to the complete coordination of all actions with its swedish command in relations.

it also manifests itself in the form of the northern defense cooperation, created back in 2009. this is the union of finland and the three members of the nation of iceland although the swedes. not members of the alliance, they provide a significant share of the supply of weapons to the northern countries and are engaged in reforming their armed forces to nato standards. norway has been in nato since its founding however , its policy has recently changed throughout the cold war. norway was like that for the ussr, i would say a good part of nato did not voluntarily restrain themselves agreed to the deployment of foreign military forces limited the activity of americans and british high latitudes. they tried to remain reliable allies of the united states, but also to be a good neighbor of russia, this has been completely

abandoned over the past 30 years. norway allowed the united states military bases on its territory so that they could more actively oppose russia. scandinavia , turning from a region of peace and stability into a zone of confrontation, is not necessarily active, but enough of the fact that we become potential targets. as well as during during the cold war, the main striking power of nato aviation is the us air force; now they are armed with fifth -generation f-22 and f35 fighters in europe, they are located at the bases of shpakdal in germany and aviation in italy, as well as at the base of lakent in great britain. us strategic aviation is mainly aircraft b-52, which have been in service since the fifties and sixties, they are found in europe. in addition, the latest

b2 stealth stealth bombers, which are based exclusively in the united states at a base in the state is not suev, the second largest. what is more important to help the nato army, according to the estimates of the global power portal, has long been not germany from turkey , it has a little more than a thousand aircraft, about 200 of which are predominantly f16- based fighters. the german air force brought typhoon fighter bombers as part of the bomber aircraft are attack aircraft tornadoes are true. their condition raises questions from inspectors. luftwaffe all these machines require maintenance. the once mighty raf now there are less than 200 combat aircraft. among them there are like american f-35s. so the european fighters of the fourth generation of the secrets of france are now also less than 200 fighters. these are rafale and mirages of various modifications of the countries of eastern

europe, poland, bulgaria and other former allies of the ussr, until recently, flew on soviet aircraft. true , they transferred a significant part of their fleet to ukraine and are now waiting for compensation from the united states in the form of f-16s and other western aircraft, the main benefit of nato from eastern european allies is their geographers. since 2013, the czech position and military airfields have been based on the american f-16 fighters and hercules c330 transporters on a rotational basis at the air bases of poland, hungary, romania, bulgaria, slovakia and the baltic states. the vilnius summit will certainly go down in the history of the alliance, at least because of the military-political context, but it did not give an answer to the main question about the goal-setting of the organization, according to all signs of russia, nato

returned to the cold war, its most acute phase. but there is a fundamental difference from the second half of the last century, then nato formulated the task of protecting the values ​​of the free world from the ussr. the soviet union responded in a mirror image after the ninety-first year, the goal of the western community was not to protect, but to promote their values, that is, expansion. it was expressed in the massive expansion of nato to the east and in military operations in different parts of the world for the entire period from the end of the forties to the end of the eighties. the alliance did not participate in wars; they began when the main enemy was gone. the north atlantic alliance first took part in the fighting in the middle 1990s, when an interethnic war was going on in bosnia and herzegovina against the backdrop of the collapse of yugoslavia, at first nato forces provided

the no fly zone regime, but in august 1995, without the approval of the un security council, the alliance aviation launched a large-scale military operation, a deliberate force, during which it provided air support to croatian and bosnian units and carried out massive bombing of serpukhov positions in 2 weeks , about a thousand air bombs were dropped in the spring of 99 after the failure of negotiations on kosovo and serbia's refusal to signing the peace plan, nato planes attacked his glory. under the pretext of large-scale ethnic cleansing. muslims under bombardment. nato turned out to be the territory of the country, not only the military to civilian even residential facilities in the 78 days of the allied forces operation died. more than 2,000 civilians in kosovo and about a thousand more were injured in mitohi serbs claim that combined uranium munitions were used in the strikes because of this

, the number of cancers in the region increased in the fall of 2001 in response to the terrorist attack by us al-qaeda and their nato allies launched operation enduring freedom in afghanistan at the peak of hostilities, there were more than 100,000 american soldiers in the country and about 30,000 military and nato troops remained in afghanistan . it lasted 7 months and ended with the division of the country into camps for the creation of several governments and the killing of the moar when talking about success. alliance most often. damn, his naval missions since 2001, as part of operation nato naval forces have patrolled the mediterranean sea for more than 15 years to stop the smuggling of weapons and

materials intended to create weapons of mass destruction in 2009, the alliance launched operation ocean shield to counter illegal migration and combat piracy off the salt coast the very presence of international military -naval forces in the region were held back by the libster. the political west has the global ambition of nato, for example, aiming at asia, it is not only about expanding atlanticism to europe, as a balloon that inflates and inflates, it completely occupied the space of the political west leaving no room for anything else and this is a closed ideological system. it does not accept ideas from the outside let russia complain about nato expansion for 30 years but this just confirms that we are right the fears of asian countries are not important. this summit showed that ambitions are growing faster than the ability of their real content. in

august 2021, the united states and its nato allies completed the withdrawal of troops from afghanistan, completing the longest military campaign in american history, operation enduring freedom began after the september 11 attacks and lasted 20 years, twice as long as in iraq , during which time tens of thousands of civilians were killed and more than 2,500 american soldiers , the company was too expensive according to analysts for two decades of war in afghanistan in washington spent more than $ 300 million daily in 2011 in the white house, they were seriously talking about reducing the contingent barack obama promised that the us military would complete operation after 3 years and leave the country, but this plan never came to fruition by the end of 2014 afghanistan still had about 10,000 us soldiers in operation.

freedom, which later developed into a nato mission, no strong support in 2017, trump, on the contrary, allowed military personnel in the region to increase the number of troops without prior approval from the white house , according to the official version, to train advising and assisting afghan forces, as a result, by 2018, the number of american contingents grew to 15,000 people in february 2020, the united states and the taliban signed a peace agreement, which, among other things, obligated the united states to withdraw troops from afghanistan within 14 months from the date of signing the document, provided that the taliban complies with its obligations in 2021, already with baddin, the parties set a deadline 31 august and although the date was known,

the withdrawal of american troops in advance turned out to be poorly organized the us military was leaving afghanistan in a hurry to abandon weapons and equipment in the cartoon of the british times, a soldier who looks like joe biden, flying away , says that he leaves the country in the same state. in what it was, according to the petagon, leaving afghanistan for the united states left military equipment worth $ 7 billion to the taliban on july 30, as part of the shelter operation for the allies, aviation evacuated from the country embassy staff, the united states and afghan citizens, mainly military translators, in which people were threatened with reprisals carried on s17 cargo planes in an atmosphere of complete chaos, only those who wanted to leave, who were stormed by the airport by the us military introduced warning fire and used stun grenades. and although the us troops managed to withdraw on time

, not all americans managed to evacuate. as long as you don't really take risks for them, that's how it was in the 1990s and now the 2000th chance of a war between nato and russia is higher than in the previous cold war, but the fuses are not being activated. the cold war was a time of balance of power, self-restraint and discipline were required on both sides of cooperation, then it was based on the recognition of each other's security and the need to find compromise. now in power in europe is a generation that was formed later in the era of unipolarity and cooperation means something else for them. the united states sets a condition for the rest to accept them and go. what diplomacy has become from the point of view of nato , in itself, communication is a form of encouraging those

who behave well, cooperation . a pedagogical tool is a way of socializing those who deserve it . in which the west has long had the opportunity, when the student stops listening to the teacher. there you need to use force to restore the authority of the political west is ready to fight, depending on what we call fighting. we can say that a proxy war is already going on, the more. the political west is growing, the larger its ambitions. and the less homogeneous it is, someone is clearly ready to fight eastern new europe may be old europe i have big doubts, italy france germany with the current coalition government. they generally have something left to fight. they gave everything. ukraine normal projectiles. the americans have already

run out of cassettes to get them from the warehouse, and then a discussion arises, as it is now in russia about nuclear weapons. is the us ready to sacrifice new york for the sake of burning before the answer has always been no, but something crazy extremist is happening in the world, you can't be sure that no one will say hmm but let's try. let's not try, otherwise it was somehow dumb it was an international review. goodbye. what were your feelings? when did you first come here? of course i was in in shock, the state de facto controlled part of the capital and the road from the capital to cameroon . it was all state control in this country, which the area from france to the russian federation played a very important role in restoring peace. this marked the beginning of cooperation in the field of security by groups for the jealousy of other countries

, the lives of people who are saved in the security that is returning are important to us . the british and french wanted to do everything possible to prevent war. my grandfather always considered an alliance with russia as the main condition for more than 20 thousand people a day biblo during the great patriotic

war. we are at a very dangerous moment in human history, what is happening now in ukraine is the lessons of 2018, the june 22 edition is designated as the beginning of the german-soviet war. well, ukraine has nothing to do with the lessons of the past. otherwise, we will repeat it from history and make a decision on the basis.

we'll take care of this. it will be the honest detective.

i welcome, dear friends, to our new edition of the besogon tv author's program it will not be called all gold that glitters. think. you will understand. why is our program named like that? first i