[000:00:00;00] and further on our air, the international review program needs a summit in vilnius, ukraine was again not invited to the alliance zelensky looked upset, instead, they offer kiev certain guarantees and security, they are compared with what the united states provides to israel, but they are extremely, blurry undermining. read more about this and more right now. hello on the air international review in the studio of fyodor lukyanov today in the program international review events of the week of the chronicles facts comments ukraine was asked

wait for the materials of our program. military bloc from yugoslavia to afghanistan the first operation abroad get used to the idea that the natural thing is not brinkmanship. a negotiations on controversial issues of confrontation,

and peaceful cooperation. not balancing on the brink of war, and negotiations on controversial issues are not a confrontation, but peaceful cooperation was uttered by leonid ilyich brezhnev in his report to the 25th congress of the cpsu in february 1976. and it’s still relevant in vilnius that a nato summit was held, which was very much anticipated, especially in kiev and stockholm ukrainian capital expected to receive an official invitation to the swedish alliance to stand up, and finally its full member did not happen. ukraine retained the status of a partner without legalized relations, and sweden healthy on turkish mercy. well, in the fall, if nothing happens. the significance of the meeting is not in these specific stories, although they attracted attention more importantly than what brezhnev spoke about almost half a century ago, understanding what the alliance’s course is aimed at cementing the confrontation or finding ways to make it more

flexible and manageable, but first things first. slovak marian kamensky and his work titled vicious circle on signposts written by nato a long way to military alliance membership, the conservative, british times, and her peter bruce. the inscription reads welcome welcome to nato two large letters form english well or not, the german cartoonist burkhartmore drawing is called running man on an umbrella written by nato extremely expressive work of the magician erdogan everything is honest without deceit oliver seam and for austria about joining the alliance with sweden although its prospects are so to the end and not dreams. but polukaleriya, not even doubting that sweden will be in nato, because on her side, the strongest girl in the world, pippi longstocking , is a character in the novel of the same name by the swedish

writer. austria blades. she has a man like erdogan. and now the papilotta speaks louder so that everyone can hear. the ukrainian leadership used all media and political opportunities to convince western public opinion not to invite kiev, nato is indecent, but the 23-year-old decision reproduces the results of the bucharest summit 15 years ago in the spring of 2008, then the us administration demanded that the allies begin the official procedure for georgia and ukraine to join the alliance by approving for them an action plan for map membership, in other words , a roadmap for joining the bloc. cosmi lay down berlin and paris are not allowed, they say, russia was not allowed to provoke podichs. but in the memorandum of the meeting, they wrote that georgia

, ukraine will be members of nato someday later, but georgia has definitely lagged behind since then, but for ukraine in vilnius, deja vu is a promise. we don’t have to take it like that later, when the conditions are ripe, but by all means. why in 2008 the european giants were against the rapprochement of the former allied republics of nato we asked the wonderful diplomat alexander alekseevich avdeev he was then the russian ambassador in paris france back at that time she was enough. let shirokovskaya still sarcosine came into force. he just got elected. uh, the mfa was still set in an inorganic spirit, there were, uh, interesting ideas and illusions. uh, good relations with russia uh. true, sarkozy already at that time advocated

the return of the nato military organization, but nevertheless the french hesitated. i don't know exactly what happened in berlin but i think it was the german chancellor who was elected in 2 years. before. uh, there were the same fluctuations, although 15 years is negligible by historical standards, that mood seems to be already almost unbelievable in that period there were still many , uh, hopes for further development relations between the alliances and russia on this score from the french, do you remember, uh? sarkozy even came to moscow on the eve of the elections. it was 2007, although vladimir vladimirovich did not accept it, but other leaders accepted it, and then there were good institutions

that the main priority in european politics would be given to the development of partnerships and special ties with russia. sarkozy repeated shirak's phrases, although he acted on -other. well, ukraine that period was a little different, there was another hmm hope for resolving the main contradictions between russia and ukraine and everything else and the flexible french, the flexible french of that period understood that they could ruin the game if they didn’t deserve it ahead of time, but contrary to the criteria. uh, they will speak out for the admission of ukraine with alexander, we talked in different ways, we will continue in the following programs. in the meantime, about an interesting change in 2008, germany and france opposed the entry of ukraine into nato , but germany and france were pushing the united states now france is for germany, as before, against the americans already on

her side. why julienne shift up is an attempt to move away from the deep pacifism of german political culture, but the germans are still very careful and do not want to force. for americans, the difference between the administration of bush jr. in 2008 and the current biden is a matter of domestic political culture. bush was the apotheosis of neo-conservatism and the desire to change the world now, none of the us parties has such ambitious plans, the political climate. the climate has changed in america, of course, it has changed, but the refusal is not final majority, alliance countries. and the chief of the pentagon is loyd. austin even says that everyone wants kiev there, after all see so will ukraine join nato and at least significantly from

the us and other allies about joining. uh, ukraine still needs to be done. a frivolous breakthrough in the field of democratization of the country, and of course, but he pays for the fact that ukraine entered into that time when the war is going on on the territory of ukraine because , if this is so, then there is a danger, which means directly along the initiative line between usa russia and other allies, when they start talking about the criteria and reforms , the mood of the candidates deteriorates, and ukraine, in its position , considers such insinuations simply insulting. what

specific reforms mean is not yet clear? this will become clear uh, well, over time, uh, the fact is that despite the fact that there are such allies , as turkey says a first of all , the union is democratic, and when they say there were some, and how to say weak points are areas not only with russia and, uh, no major changes, so, but major reforms of any obligation. they seem so. right now, only democratization was lacking, be that as it may, ukraine's path to nato is not destined. although there were countries in the history of the alliance that traveled through thorny paths. during the world war, turkey formally retained neutrality, but supplied germany with chromium ore and other

strategic raw materials back in forty-third at the tehran conference, churchill stalin and the russian discussed the issue of turkey joining the anti-hitler coalition . churchill also said that he would not object to access of soviet ships to the warm seas. he believed that turkey would contain the soviet union in the south. as a result, turkey broke off trade relations with germany and on february 45 declared war on her after the end of hostilities, the staran raised the question of the bosphorus and dartanals before turkey. he believed that the soviet union should gain control over them, and also recalled the territories of the transcaucasian republics, some of which went to turkey after the first world president of turkey and death and nude refused and asked for help. usa and great britain, in order to prove its commitment to atlanticism, ankara sent

a fairly significant contingent to korea to fight the communists. so in the fifty-second turkey became a member of nato, the federal republic of germany joined the alliance 3 years later, in the forty-ninth three zones of occupation. english french and american were merged. in one of them , the frg was created, the main obstacle to its entry into nato remained the decision to demilitarize germany, the road to joining the north atlantic alliance was opened by the paris agreements of the fifty-fourth year between the federal republic of germany and the united states of great britain and france, in which the latter three renounced the status of occupying powers, but retained partial control over the german army on may 6, 55 after the artification of the paris agreement on instagram. germany became full.

a month later, the bundeswehr was founded for the members of the alliance and the federal ministry of defense was created. status of a unified germany however, the soviet leadership, headed by mikhail gorbachev, did not object to further participation in the rg in the alliance, spain joined nato in may 82 only after the death of franco in march 86, under the rule of the socialists , a historical referendum was held in the country to remain in nato or not, most of the population was in favor, but it was decided not to join the joint military structure at home, spain began to participate in the work of all nato political institutions, and even an observer position was given to the nuclear group. armed planning. the forces were under the control of the national command, everything changed only in the ninety-sixth parliament

gave the go-ahead to participate in military structures. only when, after the insek rope, occupied, was the former spanish foreign minister javier sallan, a long time member of the socialist party and previously an opponent of joining the alliance. did the light converge on nato look at the military financial assistance provided to ukraine by the members of the alliance and did not dream shortly before vilnius, they started talking about israeli guarantees for ukraine israel is not included in any blocs, but is directly connected with the united states. maybe this is some new concept, israeli guarantees, probably implied. something like verbal assurances that in the event of a crisis , assistance will be provided, what kind of arms supply or direct assistance to the american part? i don't know, to be honest, that nothing written in

any agreement at the moment of aggravation is nothing more than a subject of negotiations. don't forget that the promise contained in the budapest memorandum signed in exchange for ukraine's renunciation of nuclear weapons for the territory of the country is a little worth any agreements that are not supported by military success remain on paper. unfortunately us secretary of state james baker has said twice that nato will not go east, in fact. this was a condition for the withdrawal of soviet troops from germany, although the agreements were verbal and baker said that he meant only germany. although the final communiqué spoke of eastern europe as a whole against the backdrop of the end of the cold war. no one betrayed this meaning, it seemed more important then, the treaty on conventional armed forces in europe in artillery tanks.

in combat aircraft of the country, the participants in this complex document were deprived of the opportunity to conduct large-scale military operations in europe, many experts began to call it the cornerstone of european security, but in the ninety-fourth year after the collapse of the ussr, when the clinton administration gave the green light to nato expansion, its tasks were not fulfilled by some members the alliance did not join the treaty. and many did not even ratify it as a compromise was. fundamental act, russia nato however, this did not prevent the alliance from expanding in 2004, when it included seven states at once and raised the issue of admitting the former soviet republics into its structure. and yet, what guarantees does israel have from the united states , vgtrk correspondent sergey pashkov found out on the spot? the most powerful and combat-ready in the middle

east this reputation for 75 years since the establishment of the jewish state. she earned in five short and bitter wars with arab neighbors and countless army operations in the gas sector and on the west bank of the jordan river minimum losses the maximum air defense effect is quite reliable, protecting civilian objects. in the days of the shelling, the last time the inhabitants of israel felt it was last spring, when the king's drones one by one eliminated a dozen high-ranking commanders of the islamic jihad in gaza. at the same time, no one here doubts that the most important source of all this power, money and technology, with which washington has been supplying the israelis for 70 years, the first element is the sale and supply of the most advanced weapons the most technological burning that the united states possesses or

that are produced by the united states and is directly supplied primarily to the state, israel; moreover, israel is actively involved in many developments of the latest weapons in the united states of america, since many developments, many components of many technologies. uh, they are, uh, invented and produced in israel by the first zenhower administration military financial aid agreement. made a deal with tel aviv back in 1952, when the middle east became the arena foreign policy confrontation between the soviet union and the united states since then, military support from across the ocean has become an essential element of israel's national security over the past 70 years with the money of american taxpayers. israel managed to create the most powerful armored forces in the middle east, stuffed with the most modern electronics. aviation of the new generation and the already

legendary systems about the iron dome received $ 150 billion, israel received squadrons from the united states to arm technology over the years, it is with the money of washington that squadrons are purchased, the latest f-35 missile defense systems are being developed in the seventy-sixth year, israel has embarked on a rapprochement with egypt after a bloody war. doomsday begins receiving ongoing funding from the pentagon today. that's almost $4 billion a year. washington is closely watching to ensure that israel outnumbers its neighbors in quantity, primarily in terms of the quality of weapons. however, all this directly depends on the momentary relations of strategic partners, if the next israeli government. suddenly it gets annoying washington, he can turn on the tap at any time. because there is no single global collateral agreement. israel does not exist, despite the fact that there is no

formal agreement on mutual security guarantees. there are a large number of memorandum declarations made on behalf of the president on behalf of the senate of congress, which say that america considers israel a very close ally in the middle east and will do everything necessary to maintain its, uh, combat capability. hey, and uh, economic even system stability military-technical cooperation between the united states and israel was formed over decades , the agreement was adjusted to the regional geopolitical situation. this system is based on dozens of government agreements, memorandums of direct contracts with suppliers and arms manufacturers , it is impossible to copy it and promises to reproduce israeli guarantees for ukraine. joe biden, most likely, did not mean deliveries. kiev has long abandoned armament here, israel is far behind, the head of the white

house probably meant another nato undertakes to go to war. if this decision is accepted by all countries , if one of them is attacked, nato countries are obliged to protect each other. in our case, this is not the case, no one undertakes to join the war for us, knowing the cocky nature of the ally, watching the sharp changes in political course. when the us government changes, in principle , israel does not sign a treaty on a defensive alliance, american pilots and marines do not cover heaven and earth, israel on its territory. no us military bases of critical situations. the king must rely on his own strength. sergey pashkov anastasia demyanets especially for international review, israel as you can see , israel relies primarily on itself? well,

of course, the experience was different. for a long time it was believed that in the six-day israeli war, israel reacted to a potential threat, however, in our days, thanks to new research, it has become. it is known that the egyptians and syrians were not going to attack the mobilization in the area of ​​the soviet channel or from other actions arab states gave israel the impression that he was in danger as a result, tel aviv, without even warning the main ally of the united states, began a preventive war, in a matter of days the silnaz peninsula gaza, the west bank of the jordan river, eastern jerusalem and the syrian dutch heights, the united states supported israel, even though to the erroneous attack by the israelis of the american reconnaissance ship liverty, it was not sunk, but the american sailors died, the israelis apologized and paid compensation. well they were given a stern warning if israel starts again first washington

will withdraw its support. ally as a result in the seventy-third year on the eve of the yom kippur war. even knowing that the attack will be. well, i don’t know when in israel they couldn’t do anything about the calculation of the arabs to attack on a religious holiday. it did not justify itself, it was precisely thanks to the empty roads that the israelis quickly reacted. although the first strike of the egyptians was successful as a result of the counterattack , the israelis suffered heavy losses. for the first time , soviet anti-tank missiles baby but the american conditions were met from the usa, the air bridge from the latest american s5 galaxy delivered american tanks to israel and made up for the losses, however, israel felt the danger, because the key condition for the victory of the thief in the israeli wars was not at all deliveries from the american military, according to american studies of the balance of power in conflicts barely fell short of the coefficient.

one to two, that is, against one israeli, the arabs could not put up even two soldiers, mainly about economic reasons, although they had a much larger population, however, the conflict of 73 years showed that if the arabs set a goal, they will achieve results before that, israel started first, except for the forty-eighth year. that is why the yom kippur war ended with the resignation of defense minister moshe dayan prime minister. golden mayor, and after 6 years, israel signed the peace agreement with egypt nobody has yet checked the fifth article of the north atlantic collective security treaty, but everyone understands. is there in case of force majeure. she the end of the block will not work, therefore it is difficult to disown obligations within the alliance with bilateral agreements

more unsteady. mostly. this promise means political diplomatic and economic a and military. and what kind of congress content? uh, while they are not clear, but this will become clear over time again does not depend on the level of trust between washington ikea, but i sit down to her that, firstly, we will continue, but diplomatic support for such international forms as i will spare you and this time , but tent support, otherwise there is a girl not personally the leadership of ukraine, but economic this is a continuation, but huge financial resources that are presented in ukraine and more honest, but military e, cooperation and modernization investments, a and

regulations e of the military-industrial complex of ukraine and so on. well, the most important thing to be emphasized. this is the point, but these promises do not guarantee, but that the united states would take part in military conflicts e not against anyone it is only a promise, but very often this is for what at first already makes them superfluous in time. uh or what specifically, right? everyone talks about the risks that nato will take by adopting a real strategy for a country in military conflict with russia, look further. ukraine , of course, is very dependent on western weapons, but its ability to fight is still due to its own circumstances.

they are fighting with western weapons, but for myself i would say that i would have to benefit from ukrainian membership, because today ukraine may have the most capable army in all of europe, let's say somewhere in europe a situation arises when in demand as a guarantee of collective security, according to article five of the north atlantic treaty and ukraine is not a member of nato, who can be counted on by the german army? no, so this aspect also needs to be kept in mind. no matter how speculative the anatov prospects for ukraine are , the outcome of the current military confrontation is not yet known. senseless, in my opinion, i 'll tell you this so that we have a guarantee no, the entry is such, well, relatively long-term. it's clear for sure nothing works. uh. now our military operation must end. eh, the

same. well, if you want, understanding that it ended, as it should, as it was, 45? without this guarantee that they will not accept ukraine, we will not get any. after advertising about another hero of the summit in turkey fight can be different mechanism of pain development one it does not matter what caused the pain if there is pentalgin universal remedy against different types of pain due to the combined composition pentalgin acts against pain, where whatever it may be, regardless of the reasons for its occurrence, pentalgin will do without pain, that the prospects are where the feelings are. where

they are waiting, where they love, there are prospects, and with uralsib bank they become a reality uralsi prospects, where they have poured out , book accommodation on the daily.ru website. and i ’ll unhook a cashback for you with it even cheaper so quickly booked, we’ll find where to stay in the world. hundreds can't. iota says you can try, maximum. first month for only 399 rubles. can iota sberbank represent? wow, lucy has been in yandex plus for a long time, but lucy is not

knows about books in the black. i'm already in the know, read and listen to books with your own yandex subscription. plus, until the end of summer , this glass of chef enzelier is free, maybe for a meeting for success for bright moments, or better, for one ruble you get electronic chips and choose sets of glasses, whisper everything for one ruble from vtb, this is a reason not to miss the most important moments with a cashback of up to thirty percent. get a free debit card for life vtb attention in case of allergy poisoning and hangover drink polisorb club launches benefits. let me show you the crossroads and in