or rather, so that i would help him draw up all the documents, licensing procedures and register this whole sport to legalize. and now hundreds of thousands of people in our country are engaged in it; now in russia much attention is paid to the promotion of physical activity and the creation of conditions for playing sports. new sports centers open every year. football fields and skating rinks as part of the federal business print project. i choose sports a number of regions will receive almost half a billion rubles from the budget for the construction of smart sports grounds oksana under turkin mikhailovich krasov and nikita vasiliev program senate from the ulyanovsk region. next week , senators will discuss the implementation of national projects , safe quality roads, and hold a meeting of the working group to monitor the implementation of the federal law on fisheries and the conservation of aquatic biological resources. the chairman of the federation council will sum up the results of the spring session at a press conference. see you next week on the senate program.

hello dear friends friday night. i am alexander kirievsky, it is time to sum up, most importantly, the political and economic results of the outgoing weeks today, the president gave an assessment of current

events in the world. clearly, denoting that the main world problems are being fueled by the united states to advance its interests. moreover , the american elites are interested in dragging out the ukrainian conflict and, according to the president, they are unlikely to correlate their own interests with the interests of the american people. today's us ruling elite is doing just that. in any case, in this logic they act. is such a policy in line with the true fundamental interests of the american people - is that the big question? question, of course rhetorical let them decide. however, now the fire of war is being intensively kindled, including using for this the ambitions of the leaders of some eastern european states, which have long turned russophobia into their hatred of russia into their main export commodity. and as an instrument of its

domestic policy. and now they want to warm their hands on the ukrainian tragedy. we will discuss the actions of the united states with our ambassador to this country anatoly antonov anatoly ivanovich hello, thank you for taking the time, and of course, our president is very clear today i outlined the actions of the united states. and it is clear that you are inside this country, and that's all. you see it with your own eyes, and yet. uh, here's your comment on the president's current statement. i would like to hear. well, you know, it's actually a thankless job for alexander anatolyevich to comment on what the president wanted, and that's what he said, if you'll excuse me, uh, i'll look at the picture a little bit. uh, more, coming from, uh , the donations themselves, which just recently ended, where, of course, the americans played, uh, the leading role, uh, with me too. eh, like a human

working here in the united states of america is of course concerned about the policy of nato countries led by the united states of america. i have a feeling that the united states of america and nato are pushing the world to war. eh, it provokes us, if you look at different regions of the world, and you will see that we are constantly being checked to see how we react to this or that provocation to this or that conclusion. uh, the russian federation, let's swallow, keep silent , show again, uh, our tolerance , the readiness to search for mutually acceptable unleashed or let's act. you know alexander anatolyevich, i, i will not hide them, that i looked at a lot of press

, and a lot of publications that, for our conversation with you, i recalled the famous kenan , the architect of the anti-soviet containment policy, and , i saw, i want to remind everyone of his well-known words that the aspiration of ukraine and georgia a to nato will affect vital interests. e of the russian federation e you know, you also published about this bill burns being the ambassador of e in russia in one of his telegrams i think found a very good expression that the desire of georgia and ukraine to join nato touches a bare nerve of russia well, probably well said, uh, and we must uh, we want to believe that these words will be heard today in washington, but in reality the situation is much worse than the times when kenan and bill burns wrote the american press today is filled with various kinds of russophobic publications, we are talking about a change

of political life in russia about a change in the political regime. that's right, uh, published uh in the american media and speech we are talking about inflicting damage on us, exhausting the economy, inflicting a strategic defeat on the fronts. you know, yes, what is being said is that it is necessary in russia to select a place in the security council. and even then i read somehow that it is necessary to take away nuclear weapons, but i'm such a psycho, sorry. in what way did they not write there in this article? how do they take it away? no, you know that feeling. uh, so you don’t want to, uh, speak in vulgar language, but it feels like you need to, uh, throw it into the air, and then you yourself, we figure it out, what will happen to the result of this informational output, alexander anatolyevich

, if you look very briefly, very briefly , see what you wanted. e in kiev oh yes, you are vilnius people of kiev. after all, they wanted not just membership, but in nato they wanted nato to , uh, start a war against the russian federation, in essence they were pushing the world into conflict. uh, where there is hardly any winner if nuclear weapons are used. and that they received only assurances of help, huh? e and strengthening of anti-russian centimeters or strengthening of anti-russian positions e, in the final documents of vilnius i paid special attention to this. maybe because for many years he was engaged in the problems of strategic stability on the face. you know, such obvious double standards say that america's nuclear weapons in europe are good, while our weapons in

belarus are literally bad. yesterday. i met with american political scientists and drew their attention to the ambivalent position. you know that they told me that you should do it. they even you owe us even to be grateful that we keep nuclear weapons in germany because by doing so we are holding back the nuclear ambitions of berlin berlin yeah, i wonder where berlin’s nuclear weapons come from, they didn’t say, again, yes, but let’s alexander anatolyevich you, after all, you perfectly understand with you that there are countries today that, uh, have great technological potential and which, if when god forbid u collapse e treaties on nuclear weapons proliferation, several countries can quickly master nuclear technologies to create

a nuclear explosive device, and that is why i think that in this, at least, we, together with the united states of america, when we say that under no circumstances of the treaty there is no proliferation of nuclear weapons, it is impossible to touch, and one more point that i would like to answer your question. to attract the attention of tv viewers , a very large international conference is currently taking place at the ili foundation at the aspin institute. every day, dozens of presenters perform there. to politicians and various countries of the world that i drew attention yesterday was the hall. yesterday there was a volley of such speeches made by the deputy secretary general. he, uh, juan spoke, former deputy secretary of defense call other politicians, which i noticed. it seems that there are americans in this institute. uh, the europeans justified themselves before public opinion. why ukraine did not become a member of nato said that and it is not necessary to supply it like that, because

these are very expensive systems, uh, and the americans. they themselves are not enough alexander anatolyevich pay attention to some the signals from brussels that we are hearing that it is not weapons that need to be delivered today. uh, she will repair kiev, and his ruined mangled e russian. i want to say that perhaps these are some first signs of fatigue of misunderstanding. how to get out of this situation? and here is the problem, uh, or not a problem, let's put it this way, uh, a huge discontent that is brewing around the world, but that the ukrainian crisis must be drawn in more and more. everything, it is restrained literally by a number of politicians. in america, euro-europeans who all their lives

devoted to destroying, uh, the soviet union and then, and the russian federation will not change them and as long as they are in power, this policy will continue. and you know, uh, your clear remark that there are some hints that there is some kind of realization that something needs to be done about it, otherwise the edge of the abyss is farther away, he really is. it flashes like that. in a sense , one can express oneself, but nevertheless speak, as you distributed, you noticed about the change in their policy. uh, the wounds are extremely early. it's clear too, but on the other side. this is the position of these forces, about which you just said, how strong they are now, uh, inside the american political, and american discourse, if there is, but some attempts to change the situation and a criminal case against trump are just another a. is this not a manifestation of this struggle? ah, if we

look at the situation in the country with you, it is strangely split. and today we can say that a new pre-election cycle has already begun. and the opponents are scolding each other, trying to find gaps in their positions. and what's happening now with trump. this is, of course, uh, just one example of how another party is trying to deprive him of the opportunity to try for election. and god forbid get elected. the situation for the presidency of the united states of america is very difficult, but i want to tell you that even if one could imagine that the ukrainian conflict would suddenly cease to exist. today , not sanctions, not anti-russian, washington's policy here will not change. this is for a long time, and it’s not entirely pleasant for me to be or work here with my comrades, defending

russia's national interest and trying at the same time. at the very least, save not to let the collapse of russian-american relations, from which, by the way , there is practically nothing, but it remains to give such an e , not a very good forecast of what may happen in the future, but strength. here is the russophobic intensity, especially in congress, in the highest echelons of power, in the white house and in the state department, as well as in other specific departments, it is strong while they are in power. i think that e is a crisis in russian american relations. these ones confrontation will last and i'm afraid to even predict. uh, how many years. but they cheated ivanovich and if on some issues like this this week we are very relevant this is a theoretical attack on the crimean bridge, but because it seems that, like

the american authorities, they gave some comments, but some very weak ones in general, this topic was discussed in america somehow at a higher level, not somewhere in the newspapers. and or is it so they missed everything once again alexander here this is a crime. yes, alexander anatolyevich, i say, especially how, not only as an ambassador, but as a citizen of the russian federation , of course, it will shock me. uh, shocked, uh, this realistic act against uh, our crimean bridge, will shock, well, absolutely without soulless humanity, it's inexplicable, but it's understandable. how many times have you shown on tv? what kind of cars are driving, that people go there to rest, i myself went, uh, to rest, uh, to the crimea in the summer. people died, the girl was left an orphan. well, it's generally terrible. and i can tell you one thing, that when officials washington was told, and we do not have enough

information to say, who is responsible for this attack, but just this example for you once i said the responsibility of the moral values ​​of the current political elite. uh, the united states of america is not. there is no condemnation here. there is no. there is no dressing up here. uh, their satellites from kiev so that they do not strike at civilians at civilians, but at the places of residence of russian people. and the fact that in a recent message just yesterday the day before yesterday that e mode began to use cluster munitions, but that says a lot, uh, that it's not in question. uh, just causing damage, but to the russian armed forces. it is about inflicting damage on the entire russian federation to our civilian population, where will we put the murder of daria and dugin, where will we put it, the murder of vladimir tatarsky, but these are

examples of these examples. you know more than me, these are examples of the terrorist nature of the kiev regime and no condemnation. nothing is happening here. not being to mention. even northern streams or an explosion of ammonia wires, togliatti odessa and if by the way, if the americans suddenly decided to blame either the truth about who strikes at peaceful targets, then from the kiev regime, in fact, if one can speak in such aesopian language , clothes, peacefulness would be torn off and the true essence of the realistic essence of e ukrainian nationalists would be manifested. and anatolyevich so you said, uh, you would have just repeated it earlier. they were talking about the moral properties of the american elite, which they have lost these moral guidelines. you know, but i still have question. of course, you know america better. but i

, uh, looked and understand the history. i understand that with the moral guidelines of the americans. there have always been problems. they had some glimmers of humanity. there is a joint fight against fascism, yes, before that. they, however, armed hitler to the very ears, and then they already, when they realized that they had raised a monster. they thought it might endanger their safety. so, and now, wouldn’t there be the same analogy, it’s clear that it’s stupid to refer to moral principles of course, but isn’t there the same analogy that i didn’t see that zelensky, who became insolent at the end and even ben wallace had to pull him up, for which he actually paid, apparently, his position, but nevertheless, is there such a scenario that the american elite will understand? that they raised a monster and something needs to be done with this monster? alexander anatolyevich, when i came here 6 years ago, i kept thinking about one question in my head. why does

america consider itself the best? e in the world i found the answer. eh, this question while reading eh, the work of the book is interesting books of kiseljira, and i have a feeling that today's america still lives from those fairy tales that this eh famous respected politician wrote about what they say, and democracy in america is a guiding star for all mankind - this is an ideal that all other states should strive for, and democratic institutions are the dream of states from the jungle, the expression you know is in reality. in confirmation of all this, everything decays. look at what i can’t even find, now the correct characteristics of what is happening here with lgbt people have a feeling that the american elite thinks that population growth in america will occur due to the assimilation of hispanics from

the middle east asia uh, forgetting about your own citizens, you look alexander anatolyevich what are the racial problems? and quite respected people have already told me literally several times. hey, ambassador. don't you want your russia to be like this ? would be the level of democracy, as we have in america and answer. no thanks. we have our own culture , our own traditions, our own customs. i don’t want a man running up behind me somewhere at night with an iron twist and hitting me on the head just because i have a different skin color, i can’t afford it. to put and of course, what just happened in sweden, uh, what stirred up. ah, the entire islamic world. look what a disrespectful attitude to the koran to the light word to the holy book, and that's it. this is explained by the topic. e that there is

freedom of speech. and by the way, this means it is possible to criticize a religion to criticize the quran, but it is impossible to criticize lgbt people, because it can be followed by severe, but punishment. and how do they explain it? here they are, it seems they are not fools, the americans created the technosphere. here are the devices we have in our hands. that's computers in many ways. there, of course, there are half russian nobel laureates and half programmers, but they speak russian. uh, in silicon valley. well, nevertheless, they are smart, like people, but they really are. they carry. well, such nonsense, but, but this is a loss orientation. the loss of reality is the same as the late soviet union, when the dogma is written like this somewhere, they went there, that's how we do it, but the reality we don't see it.

can it turn out that this will have an extremely negative impact on domestic politics? you said that the country is already split there and so on, but i still want to understand, so if there are already some healthy forces in america with whom you can talk or not, but maybe i’m not unlucky that i don’t meet with them very often, but again they refer to in my meetings with political scientists and academic professors, i talk about our approach, and the russian approach to lgbt people tells me, mr. ambassador, we need to be more tolerant. you don't have to pay that much attention. uh, if people want to live like that, then give them the opportunity. i say and yes for god's sake i say, do what you want in your own country, but why do you impose your moral values ​​on us? why, if you think that somewhere in some country the moral, e.g. announce sanctions and it is necessary e impose their values. i agree with you americans are not

stupid. i never talked about it. i have a lot of respect for the american people who, uh, put forward great u political scientists in this area and at the same time it is important to recognize that, of course, u many of the achievements of the american economy were achieved thanks to people from other countries. uh, it's a shame that many russians found it. uh, orphanage uh in silicon valley or let's say at the university of chicago, i especially feel sorry for the kids who, unfortunately, lose the opportunity to speak e, russian. e. i really want to believe that this is still a healthy part of american society . it will eventually dominate, and they will throw away these, er, rotten, or something, moral principles and return. e to the normal perception of today's world and will be respected. uh, national interests

, especially the culture, religion of other peoples. there is one more block of questions. yes, it ’s only worth hoping for that they still somehow have a healthy instinct, a social instinct, it will work, because we are somehow once interested in a stable america in a predictable one. they are what is happening there now. here is a very large block - a grain deal. and it is clear that the americans made a number of statements about ra. nevertheless, you know, there was one question, and there was a statement by kirby from there and sullivan and so on, but you get the feeling that after all , the americans will go to extremes and forcefully push through this deal, that is, they will fall for zelensky’s provocation. and we are like without russia here. that's it, that's all, we'll do it and we'll be ships. where they want to swim there will. rather, walking and swimming is another thing. there

is something in america. can you understand now? i understand that this is a difficult question, but nevertheless. here you have it for now. what are the first sensations america will go to extremes or not? the feeling is that, despite the scathing statements for the public, but still, that common sense that you mentioned, it is present among the americans and i did not feel it. there is no desire on the part of the armed forces of the united states of america, er, to bring the situation to the fact that two nuclear powers, despite all the difficulties that today there are a lot of publications, let's say in syria there are problems where the conflict is known to you, despite the difficulties with the american drone. e in the black sea and nevertheless. it seems to me that at the last moment the americans understand that there is no need to move further than certain features, because then everything

will collapse. this will lead to a crisis. and you want the crisis to be much more difficult. yes, for example, nevertheless they introduced additional sanctions for this week. this is first of all its second-tier jenner banks, there are other tinkoff banks, solidarity there and so on, uh, and there was a statement that we will continue to impose tougher sanctions on russia. that is, as i understand it, this policy of the states is unchanged. and here we should not expect any changes. it's not worth it and i'll remind you. e. i have not been able to draw this line very often about what russia has been since the moment of its existence. here, the new russia has not lived a single day without sanctions , whether in the field of human rights or in the field of high technologies. i think that if again imagine for a moment what we decided tomorrow. ah, ukrainian. uh, the sanctions crisis

is not going anywhere. you know very interesting. uh, there's a chain building up here. how sanctions are imposed against us, first some kind of duck or a dead cat is put into the press, then the press spins it, all this leads to the fact that sanctions are announced against us, then suddenly interest is lost, who or another problem, and the males remain after all, look. how much was said about no one with grief between a oi and u washington when trump was elected, but look how card house all accusations fell apart. let me remind you that we have repeatedly turned to the american side with a request. well, give us evidence that someone in russia interfered in electoral processes in internal affairs. we only got one answer. yes , you yourself know everything, we will not give you anything, and a conversation on this topic is useless. the main thing is that now everything, uh, everyone already knows everything that

they are inflated. uh, theses were put forward against the russian federation, but we still have sanctions, so far we have not returned our property in seattle to san francisco new york in washington and summing up. here, in a nutshell, these sanctions will remain. we must understand to expect something better. she's worth it to me to rely on her economics opera. to your magnificent human potential. well, to protect us , uh, our army, fleet yes, anatoly ivanovich and his completion of our conversation. uh, to sum it up. i understand that we are now at lower levels, there is another set of issues. well, unfortunately, we will not have time to discuss it. i mean, and the interaction in strategic weapons is there, and the next were the statements of the report. but i think that next time we will talk there while this

topic is being discussed, whether these chances still remain. well, i still ask, we still have a minute. what do you think, will there still be a dialogue on strategic and offensive weapons? and in general, in this area, or here, too, everything is deaf, how are the tanks there? alexander anatolyevich if you don't ask is it possible to resume such a dialogue? tomorrow, i will tell you no until the americans change their you can’t talk about anti-russian politics, by the way, speaking, they are constantly forwarded and brought to the embassy thoughts we are ready to interact with you, but we are only ready to interact on start issues. but we don't want to cooperate with you on any other issues. i always say with resentment that they still do not give me the opportunity to go to the rington cemetery to lay. uh, wreaths, flowers to the grave or uh, a monument to the spirit of the elbe when they met the soviet american wars. so they just want to look at one. uh, mines

launchers to see how many nuclear warheads there are, they don’t want to talk about anything else. most importantly, we need to check it all the time. and we must firmly keep us on a hard line on such a short zugundra, understanding e and additional information about the readiness of the nuclear forces of the russian federation for possible aggression against e our state, therefore , in response to your question, it consists of two parts. i believe that such a, such a conversation such a dialogue will take place sometime, but, uh, it's a pity that, uh, as it says today in short you don't have to live happy, nor do you have opinions. and so, even somehow pessimistic, we are finishing our conversation with you anatolyevich he was very interesting. e to talk to you, but , unfortunately, airtime is over. i think there will be more talk. uh, we have a lot of it that we will discuss with you, but in the meantime, thank you so much for finding

us on friday evening. thanks a lot. and let me remind you that we talked with the russian ambassador to the united states , anatoly anton, we will be back in a few minutes.