everyone says 630,000 hectares of forest in the republic and in neighboring regions, a state of emergency has been introduced, deployed additional forces of air firefighters, this is about 2,000 specialists. plus, 18 aircraft and helicopters are working with aviation assistance. war with monuments in ukraine in a day in the lvov region demolished 9 more monuments to soviet soldiers. since the beginning of the year, hundreds of local authorities have been dismantled. they say that he plans to get rid of all the monuments before january. freight train derailed in montana overturned, 11 of the 25 wagons contained paint thinner in one of them, but according to preliminary data, the leak was avoided, and information was affected. there are no specialists working on site, the reasons for the decisions are being investigated, the grain deal is a thing of the past. ukraine is now trying to change logistics and arrange deliveries through eastern europe, what poland and

hungary will do to which this, which , to put it mildly, is not equal to this, as well as the food security of the brix themselves this weekend and the russia africa summit in st. petersburg on next week about this, not only look at the international review right now. hello on the air international review in the studio of fyodor lukyanov today in the program international review events of the week chronicle facts comments grain deal in the past ukraine wants to change logistics, but eastern europe is against who bought ukrainian grain mission to feed africa materials of our program? assembly, what is happening in south africa on the eve of the prospects

for an international meeting gains the grain industry due to long-term control? i can now make more solid plans to go out and buy the new equipment i need i look to the future with optimism i am sure that i will sell everything that is grown canadian television report of the eighties farmers respond to the agreement on the supply of grain to the ussr stability is the key to optimism. action ended this week. the black sea grain corridor initiative for the export of ukrainian agricultural products across the black sea. the so -called grain deal was concluded for a year back. it was a set of indirect agreements involving russia, ukraine , turkey, and the united nations. moscow constantly fails to fulfill promises to ensure unhindered access of russian fertilizers to world markets and ease financial restrictions.

moscow heeded my complaint and the agreement was issued by the ministry of defense. warned any ships following in the conflict zone. we will consider how kuleb, who has a military appointment as the minister of foreign affairs of ukraine, is firm, kiev is ready for any risks, but will keep the corridor without russia largest insurers. already withdrew insurance coverage from possible flights of ukraine u to ukraine and u said, accordingly, that all statements are on the topic of possibility. uh, maritime trade. uh, without, uh , security guarantees from russia, they are, as it were , cut off from reality. insurance and faction in the conditions. uh, hmm becomes impossible, that is insurance. there it can become expensive. we naturally, no grain will justify this. and if there are those who want to organize military

escort of ships for the carrier, the convoy something changes nothing changes, the risk remains the insurance coverage. no, that is, the carrier risks, and he risks, so to speak, several degrees. uh, firstly, the birth of the insurance, then he is fully responsible for the loading. excuse me, there he will be loaded with grain worth several million dollars and this is his direct loss, and he bears full financial responsibility for the ship to his shareholders there or to his own pocket, if he actually has owners , moreover, many of all these owners here is in the league if all of a sudden fortunetellers find out to people that the ship on which the rain was transmitted goes to dangerous closed areas without insurance, then it can simply take away from here and not only specifically for this, which they once said, even better returned by karma. all that conveyed this were accompanied, that is, we have super

owners. uh, such campaigns, uh, they hang just brownies food a constant threat to the most natural bankruptcy of complete bankruptcy. great britain set up a naval blockade in germany, at the very beginning of the war, they began to take it seriously only after the war began to drag on. britain could not put up a large army, so it engaged in the economic strangulation of germany. the industrial revolution led to the fact that the population moved from the villages to the cities and, if earlier each country more or less provided itself with grain, now industrialized states. more and more people are starting to buy products abroad . britain has announced that all ships that go to germany will be inspected, and the germans were simply captured, the german merchant fleet was old after the british by the fifteenth year, the french calculated that during the first autumn of hostilities

80 kg of chocolate were brought to sweden for each inhabitant. this includes old people and babies. germany received goods through gray imports through neutral countries. the government did not blockade the baltic coast, and sweden norway denmark opposed the blockade of the united states , by the way, they also adhered to neutrality until the seventeenth year, then in london it was decided to introduce a system rationals. that is, to limit the flow of goods to neutral countries more than the volumes that they consumed before the war, the surplus was declared smuggling to it, and so was any military supply. and now everyday goods have been added food fodder clothes and even shoes the issue was considered so important that a special ministry of blockade was organized with the then large colonial powers and holland concluded entire agreements to reduce foreign trade, a dutch

overseas cod appeared, which distributed goods inside the country and became the body of control of britain, such a scientific and diplomatic approach, including to the scandinavian countries, led to the fact that german exports and imports began to fall. germany, with the help of submarines, tried to organize a counter-blockade of the british isles, it was even considered relatively successful, while the boats attacked separately, going ships, but in the seventeenth year , the british introduced a convoy system, and the effectiveness of the german submarine fleet. went down. germany declared unrestricted submarine warfare and said it would sink the neutral ship of the victim was the steamer, the lusitania, it was sunk by the german , the u-20 submarine killed more than a thousand people , and among them many americans, the press presented the sinking of the passenger liner as an act of a barbaric way of introducing war, before sinking the merchant ship. it was necessary to ensure the safety

of passengers, and the submarine cannot do this for obvious reasons . entry into the war in a long war of attrition, this changed the nature of the blockade and eventually led to the defeat of germany ukraine announced mirror measures against russian ships, we have, at least in words, a new round of escalation. threats of a naval blockade the complexity of the conflict lies in the fact that the legal status of the conflict has not been clarified, no one has declared war, if we consider the situation as peaceful, one must refer to the international law of the sea, primarily the un convention of 82, but they somehow do not look like the world, that within the framework of this law it

position norms. and by the way, very interesting questions about what are the norms and provisions of this law, customary international law, which everyone must observe. well, i think and guess, of course not, because there are no universal imperatives that everyone observes. the americans believe that within the framework of, as it were, this international law of armed conflicts, certain maritime zones can be created. they call them by different names. exclusion zone. forbidden zone operational zone, military zone them use these an analogy of ours, as if it were a temporary dangerous zone, we created it exactly on february 25, 22. and this is a large part of the water areas of the northwestern part of the black sea. that is, this is the entire water area , which, as it were, is both ours and ukrainian to the border with romania. you understand, yes, that is , that's all, we kind of closed for shipping

, we had such a right to again praise the american experts american experts believe that yes. such zones are absolutely legal and practice confirms that this is so? what practice practice historical alkan war for the malvinas islands. argentina great britain did exactly the same. argentina closed most of the south atlantic ocean. well it's just part of it was uninteresting for international shipping. in principle, they promised that they would take absolutely all warships and civilian ships. remember the same thing was the secret war in the eighties 88 between iraq and iran , they also closed a huge water area and says, or something, any ships, well, of course, and warships will be subject to attack . you can't pass the same way the americans did during the first and second player

campaigns. they closed a fairly large part of the water area of ​​the territorial sea and cancer and huge parts of the water area around oil and gas platforms, that is, the americans have a practice for this practice. a whole zone like this. possible, it turns out a direct attack is quite realistic to look at the convention of the war of 1909, it is supposed to. wherever you arrive, there is a public communication channel through which you bring births. uh, if there after the second the third confirmation does not work, but the use of weapons begins. it all depends on the blockade regimes, if we introduce, relatively speaking, a police blockade, then we can try, respectively, to drop off an inspection to a friend. well, since we see an armed conflict, uh, with the use. aviation missile systems with the presence of the enemy, as

we know the coastal artillery in the form of anti-ship missile systems, which have already worked with unpleasant effects. unfortunately, even under these conditions. i'm afraid to try to land there, screening in the game risk their lives, there marine latins. 15 no one will. just after there the second third warning. on a common radio channel, there will be no answer to it and the ship will not turn back, most likely, it will detain any civilian warships from this. yes, it is necessary here, as if this situation was also defined, as if into two parts, let's say these are ships with a ukrainian flag or belonging to a ukrainian court. well, about the same thing, in principle armed conflict, he provides that yes. we are always within of such a zone we have the right to stop inspection and

further detention and even, as it were, to use weapons against a civilian ship. but, if we do this, we must understand very well, but let's report that, let's say this ship is carrying into service involved in some reconnaissance activities. or maybe it is no longer even a civilian vessel, but a military relief vessel. well, in general, in general, it is involved in some kind of armed conflict. that is, as if a participant in this armed conflict then certainly any measures may be applicable. the only thing, as it were, is also a limitation within the framework of international law of military conflicts, that the crew and crew of citizens. well, of course, must be saved. well, you need to give, as it were , a signal to use weapons, yes,

and they need to be saved. as if there are neutral countries. we are not talking about ukraine now, there are other countries, yes, which, in principle, can also escort their civilian merchant commercial vessels to the ports of ukraine. and so , too, within the framework of this law. well, it is clearly formulated, as it were, a certain position about that yes, they are, firstly, how could we also stop them, inspect them, detain them, if at all they also transfer weapons into the conflict, they are involved in activities then unconditionally. yes, in general, the legal status of what is happening is of decisive importance. we are talking about situations of peacetime and peaceful relationships, in general, any clouds and running zones, as it were, from the point of view. the resolution

of the general assembly is an octome of aggression. we often come to the general sorbion's resolutions. we are so very skeptical. yes, like, well, what is it such a general assembly, as if it is complete nonsense, but as it were, there are three judicial cases that confirm. what can't be done. block ports and coastline and there are three court cases. these are all the cases that were resolved within the framework of a key international court station from international un courts. this is the case of corfu forty-ninth year, albania paid compensation for mining great britain is a case. nicaragua v united states is very funny, by the way, okay nicaragua won the case. americans

it was very easy for the americans to illegally dominate near the coast of nicaragua ; they did not recognize the legality of the court and did not participate. and they didn’t pay any compensation, but it wasn’t the ship that won the case, and it entered, as it were, in the history of international maritime law and the case of iran against the united states. and the americans accused that the iranians also mined some water areas, two warships were blown up there, and then they blew up two oil and gas extraction towers. and then i decided that no matter how it was proved that it was iran mined. and the americans do not have enough arguments to use force aggression yes against iran. these three cases show that in peacetime, if we believe that there is no armed conflict between the russian federation and ukraine, that is, in peacetime, we do not have the right to any military blockade, any mining and

detention of civilian ships. everyone agrees that exports across the black sea are in fact. now impossible. so, we return to the discussion about world food security, which was in full swing a year ago, russia is accused of neglect of the poorest, who are in dire need of grain, the commodity, however, as many times it was pointed out, was not for them, but the facts are not a hindrance to reproach. moreover, the markets are really reacting nervously to news from the black sea basin, but is it really the case, let's talk with a sign mikhail vorov heads the russian egyptian business council there, grain is an important part of business, but our interlocutor has a very diverse experience with the topics that we are talking about today michael hello. hello fedor ah, well , the world markets are all, uh, including laborers experienced a great shock for the events and 22-23 years. ah, but in politics,

for example, the ukrainian crisis, after all, did not cause these upheavals. it has become a catalyst here in the food markets. is it related to the crisis, or what we see now has already accumulated there, yes, it has clearly accumulated. uh, this situation is getting worse and worse. i want to give you two numbers that are really, uh, very, very specific . what is the situation in the tenth year of the total volume. uh, grain imports worldwide totaled 270 million plus or minus. yes passes 10 years 20 e. the twentieth year is already 660 million. during this period, the world's population increases by fourteen percent, but the fact is that we are now running, we are moving towards one billion tons and imports for a reason. this is not a business. it's for survival reasons. this is because of uh food security.

and i will give you another example, a specific example of egypt 100 million 110 million people simonyan apartment 35 million tons of grain for those who do not understand uh, grain i want to mention that about russia annually, and exported about 55 million tons of grain russia is the number one exporter of two in depending on forward. yes, that is, we are talking about colossal volumes. in addition , thirty-fifth million tons of grain for egypt is today. this is 55 million tons. it's fifty five percent. total country consumption. imagine you are the president of the country. and more than half , and this figure, which is constantly growing, is more than half of what your people cannot eat in the country. that is, you are already dependent on the global market. this is all such

a critical dependence, and there has already been such a historical warning not only to egypt, and to all, but to mankind in the eleventh year, and in september, in my opinion, the tenth year , russian president medvedev suddenly suddenly closes the export of land. do you remember in february the president of power. it's not only because of this , but it was the impetus, to be honest, a new era is starting, this is the era of war between importing countries, which has come, and the list is increasing by 4 years ago pakistan , which has always been able to produce all the food that is consumed is consumed. today already entered the club, importing countries. ah, and now the fight begins.

soon the war from those who have this food and look at those for whom this is not a business, and the question of survival says, there is food everyone wants this food, but uh, a new question opens here. this is a question of sovereignty. what will be not only the financial cost of this guarantee of receiving food, but there will already be conditions and so on, so i am in various articles that write speeches. i have already started talking about food sovereignty. because i expect a large quantity to be delivered cases where the country will have to give up many elements of its sovereignty in order to provide the uh volumes that are needed. in the sixty-third year , a drought occurred in the soviet union. by december, the

country had harvested 20% less grain. a year earlier, the cataclysm also affected the socialist countries of eastern europe, a crop failure threatened acute shortages of bread , the soviet government decided to purchase 12 million tons of grain from the usa and canada, giving over 400 tons of gold for it, such volumes were necessary not only for domestic use, but also to help the fraternal socialist countries, the hungarian leader. yana shkader. he has already started negotiations with washington, and in purchases without the participation of the ussr, moscow decided to play ahead of the curve and not allow a loss of face since then the ussr annually bought bread overseas. although in smaller volumes in the seventy-fifth year, the soviet union and the united states entered into a long-term contract for the annual supply of eight million tons of grain in the seventy- ninth ministry of agriculture. decided to sell the ussr another 17 million tons in excess norms for next year, but after the entry of

soviet troops into afghanistan, president carter announced the termination of the contract. he promised that soviet grain would be bought by the state from american farmers at market prices. it was only part of a whole package of sanctions, among them a new restriction on the sale of high technology , all joint cultural economic activities were frozen, and soviet ships were forbidden to fish in us waters, this significantly reduced the catch in the ussr but did not help the american station strategy, which fully supported only great britain western europe agreed only to the grain embargo, which just did not achieve its goal, the ussr purchased wheat in argentina , canada, spain and australia, which did not share the position of the united states, besides, moscow will make a discount, which hit price policy. american farmers the us government spent more than $2 billion to

buy back their products unpopular decision affected the 1980 presidential election carter's action was criticized by his rival and future presidents ronald reagan in april 81 he canceled the grain embargo, and the soviet troops tried afghanistan for another 8 years. please tell me, but this is like a question. yes, i understand it is very political, but still quantitative indicators play a very important role here. and if we talk about quality in the sense of how the international trading system works in general. uh, food and compare it to what it was. well, for example, 50 years ago, where is it heading? well, look 50 years ago, trade was more regional yes 50 100 years ago, but uh grain from argentina was not taken to pakistan yes or religion. now what's going on, how like a formed market there is a figurative cartel oligopoly of large, but

trading houses or companies, yes, which in fact are specialized in the literature called abcd yes, these are bungy hags or so on, they control about 80-85%, uh, ry. nka, that is, the grain trade, but there is a very important nuance here. these big companies than are strong. first, they are the creators of information. they control literally all information among themselves and therefore, instead of in order to connect supply and demand so that the market gives the necessary signals so that producers can adapt their behavior accordingly. uh, uh, the level of risk of their products and so on, as there is no demand for this.

there are these companies that form the market and which gives one signal to the producers that no one wants to abstinence difficult, and now the policy does not give and prices are falling, and the second point, which is very important. this is the logistics of today when you read, literature, and the world's training grains. e more and more appears what is called smart lodges verse, smart logistics on the same in fact. e about when you buy or the government? egypt buys grain already sivkair uh half, if not more, uh, the cost of this grain is not its production. this is her production. this is logistics and logistics is a very big problem, because it is actually on the planet. there is a huge potential to feed more more people, but you understand that feeding

is not producing. and this is such a big deception that he himself and others started. similar companies that here the new technology will make it possible to produce more. this is absolutely not true. uh, especially that let's, uh, let's grow more in this finnish region in perm. well, from there this grain, as it reaches the quarry. today, two phenomena are two problems, and already problems, that demand reaches a level that does not give. great liquidity and very interesting, i read two weeks ago that the egyptian plan. uh, the government didn't get 3.2 million tons of grain, that's creepy. this is a very, very dangerous signal, in fact, on market. and uh, so this is a real problem and the second problem is that now the market is losing its effectiveness, its

transparency, because now it starts very strongly political manipulation. you see, from until september, egypt lives on stocks, which, while he himself produces the import season - this is september to march, more or less until february, at the peak of imports. egypt has enough storage infrastructure for 2-3 weeks. everything is fine. you are told by lovers of free markets, but there are constant ones. so-called e disruption, yes, when something violation of the violation of the system of the plan, yes, which has been for several years, when it was 2-3 years ago some kind of evergreen some ship blocks its channel. well, who could this is the problem between russia and ukraine russia west. in fact, this is not the cause of the problems. it's just an accelerator, a disaster,

but a disaster is inevitable. you don't have to wait for someone to help you. i solved your problem and it's very interesting now that the new uh event is the announcement of the merger of a huge american trader and uitter. means, story. here is a very interesting bomb. historical was traders, by the way these uh bcd these eight uh traders basically. americans, yes, that is, they really understand, they correctly set the tk, they work. e is not only to make money, but it is a huge tool of influence. it is necessary to understand this, but if the bungy was i was left alone. uh, the biggest grain traders in the world bunk about 25 years ago felt that more profits were being processed,

including us surplus products, and so uh already most of the bungies arrived. e, it came from the process of processing oilseeds, but now this new situation is opening up, from which i speak, and what to do more understands that they are a little lacking in different markets for trade, because now the fight against blockages will be bloody. and what are they, they are a taker who has a lot, who are purely such a trader, who is up to the equipment in his ability and does not trade the keyword, here i do not trade from access to volume.