only if they understand and they see what the local authorities are doing. and what kind of work do they do, so here the emphasis absolutely needs to be shifted to people, that is, a person should be in the center of attention. and , of course, there is a lot of question, that is, and, uh, this is not only a domestic plan, but it is also other support measures. this is another explanatory work. these, of course, are the constant outcomes of citizens, which allow us to identify some uncharacteristic difficulties or shortcomings there. well, like, for example, here in the lower hmm and here some problem was revealed people want to pay utility bills. ah, there is only one cash desk or there is one bank branch where they can do it, so people , in order to pay for utilities, have to stand in line there for 4-5 hours, and at the same time i receive reports that, uh, somewhere there are weak payments for utilities. well, this is incomparable, therefore, of course. these are

the moments that need to be addressed individually. well, i'll tell you attention to people. that's what e lacks. maybe some here there moments. here, but there they immediately make decisions, including personnel decisions, otherwise it will not be possible to correct the situation. give me money. you are absolutely right with people you need to talk and hear what they ask the authorities to do it unconditionally. so thank you very much. um, let me remind you, we talked with the rio of the head of the dpr, denis pushilin, this was the fifth studio. all the best. i thank alexander kievsky interlocutors, and now, with an urgent message that comes out in minutes , tapes come to the news agency. e message from marked with a lightning bolt referring to the department of defense. at night, they unsuccessfully tried to attack with two marine unmanned boats, the patrol ship sergei kotov in the black sea, and in the course of repelling the attack with sergei kotov, the remote-controlled boat could have been destroyed. there were no victims,

carefully, we will continue to follow the incoming information after a short pause. now the federation council is broadcasting the deepest indignation at the vile act of attacking our journalists in zaporozhye , sincere words of condolences to his colleagues the community lost a young talented

professional man honestly, who did his duty and visited his life very important for society. uh, to the cause of journalism, he always told people the truth about what was happening in the zaporozhye region in the donbass. i fully support the application for a high state award. rostislav, he certainly deserved it bitterly only add to death. and we saw that he condemned. this dastardly murder was also strongly condemned by unesco and demanded an investigation. uh, how could this happen

it is important, but no less important, that these words be followed by concrete actions so that the next atrocity of the ukrainian regime does not go unpunished, and it is obvious and understandable that all responsibility for this lies not only with qiwi but also with washington . for our part, we will do everything to attract the attention of our foreign colleagues, e.g. international inter-parliamentary platforms. i want to express my condolences to this atrocity and once again i want to express my condolences to the guys , the journalists who suffered as soon as possible recovery and speedy recovery. by the end of the parliamentary session , i would like to say that it was indeed

very eventful and, in my opinion, productive. taking into account our final meeting, which will be held on friday. we reviewed and approved about 500 laws. and most importantly, to a large extent , i would say, we have completed legislative work to ensure the economy of financial institutions in the new realities that we live in, and to pay tribute to business support. our business and small medium large. uh, very fast adapted to the conditions of pressure from the west and hmm make a big contribution to the successful development of the economy. we paid great attention to social issues.

uh, thanks to the common teamwork, despite all the difficulties , not a single national project has been stopped, that all social guarantees for our citizens are fully implemented by the state and mmm solves those priority tasks that the country faces in more detail about the results of the work. i'll tell the plenary session to close the session. and now let's move on to specific questions ready rossiyskaya gazeta, please start with you. hello valentina ivanovna, galina mislivskaya rossiyskaya gazeta, mm, work has already begun on next year's budget. there is a lot of talk about what it will be like and there are some worries about it. do you think it will be possible to balance it, so that social obligations

do not affect social spending? but first of all , i want to say that the government has already begun work on the formation of the budget for the next three years, and i will be honest. i don't see any major threats. and even more so some dramatic events. there is every reason to assert that a balanced budget will be prepared, aimed at developing the social budget, for this we have all the prerequisites, although the task is clear. such extraordinary in those serious conditions of confrontation with the west and all that they do, nevertheless. uh, the government has already proposed several tools, uh, that will help balance the budget, but first, in my opinion. it is necessary to carefully analyze and update the expenditure part of the budget. rejection of ineffective

and ineffective measures or those that are funding, i mean, or that can wait to focus on priorities. priorities. they are known. uh, it was stated that perhaps the expenditure side of the budget. we'll have to save on e, we'll have to cut it down. eh, 10%. this is absolutely not dramatic. the situation is normal. but the only thing. in my opinion. it doesn't need to be linear. this is to spend here is the same for everyone at 10%, and very carefully approach the cloud somewhere. maybe it is possible to reduce by 15% somewhere by five. and somewhere in general some articles must be absolutely protected, which cannot be reduced. well, there are maneuvers and resources. uh, with the reduction in the expenditure side of the budget, there certainly is.

i think that it will be necessary, for the time being, to abandon the financing of the start of construction of financially costly large capital projects, and to focus on the completion of already approved ones that have already been started in order to put the system into operation in a timely manner, including, first of all, social facilities, there is something to work on and on the revenue side. there are also reserves. e in the conditions such crisis phenomena, believing that in no way it is impossible to increase the tax burden on business, it is counterproductive at the same time. uh, there are reserves to replenish the revenue side of the budget about this, too, we should not forget that everyone is somehow mainly focused on spending. uh part, uh, third i guess hmm. we have the ability for the entire government to increase the government's debt. here, too, there are no threats to the budget and the financial system, because russia has a minimum amount of

public debt, which indicates that that in recent years we have been pursuing a prudent financial policy. and in these conditions, we were protected in many ways. and, indeed, our debt is minimal. unlike in the united states where it has long gone off scale and every year even the possibility of a default is considered, or let's say in the uk where the national debt is already equal to 100% hmm e gdp hmm we can afford borrowing to reduce the deficit. uh, now there will be such non-public for 2 months, non-public work. uh, in the detailing rooms senators, especially members of the budget committee , will be involved in this process for us, as it is very important for the chamber of regions. e, so that regional budgets are balanced. so

that the necessary financial support is provided by the budget of the regions where there are problems for us. eh, it's important and i can already guarantee that, that all social obligations. citizens will certainly be fulfilled in the upcoming budget cycle for us priority on children's health care. uh, within the framework of the ten decade of childhood, the federation council for spends on the construction of fifty-three new children's medical institutions. twenty of them have already been put into operation before the end of this year, 10 more must be put into operation in order for this program to be fully implemented. we also want to continue the program to modernize the infrastructure of children's recreation. this is also a very important area for strengthening

health promotion, health promotion and health improvement of our children and a number of other sensitive topics. and we hmm continue to work closely with the ministry of department and objectively and by regions to assess hmm the budget submitted to the state duma and we will give at the traditional parliamentary hearings, as always, which will begin in the early days of october a and a it is important that you know the federation in advance, yes, it has prepared the concept of our vision of the formation of the federal budget, we have adopted a corresponding resolution and there is an understanding that the ministry of finance. uh, there will be scientists, those proposals that were set out in the resolution of the federation council , we continue to work colleagues, we continue to go to russia 24, please introduce to all colleagues. and good afternoon natalya solovyova

russia 24 valentina ivanovna, the president set the task of providing all-round support to the participants in the special military operation, of course, to their families, and we know that quite a lot of laws were adopted during this session. do you think enough has been done or will this work be continued. as we stated at the beginning of the session, the legislative registration of support for the participants of the special military operation and families was the most important priority for us for spring session. we have adopted about 60 laws and thus created a systemic state policy to support those people who today are up in arms. defends the freedom independence and sovereignty of russia and also the protection of their families. i am absolutely sure that

this is correct. this is fair and deserved. uh, it is very important that we have not only adopted laws, but in accordance with the president's initiative, the all-russian fund has also been created in russia. defenders of the fatherland from june 1 in each subject of the federation have earned its branches, thus, those laws and support measures that we have adopted today can be implemented by each member of the family in the mtr. eh, very systemic. i said, i would say a tool in one window in one place. a person comes and raises a question , and then the whole team of hmm, a branch of the fund, but works out this problem, since there are interdepartmental issues. federal

regional departments and the person gets the help he needs. and this is the first and most important thing. it's been a month now. you even two months of work of these centers, we we were convinced how timely and correct this decision was, and, of course, all of our fund, the defender of the fatherland. he analyzes the incoming questions. uh, systematize them and prepare new proposals. supplement where there are still gaps in the legislation. and today , six additional bills have already been prepared, and seven more are being agreed upon. e government. that is, we have basically completed this task, but in the autumn session we will continue to supplement the legislation with separate nuances provisions so that hmm military people

who today uh, serve faithful to the fatherland. eh, fully supported. and the state guaranteed them maximum support measures. thank you interfax please ask you a question. and interfax, valentina ivanovna, is now working on changing the boundaries of the draft age, and now it is proposed to call from eighteen to thirty years old, and now these amendments should be considered at home, at least in the second reading, if they are supported, then how the senators will vote. well colleagues, i i'll give my opinion, in my opinion. there are no reasons for e excessive resonance around this law. let's take a closer look. the first term of service in the army does not change, as they served for a year, they will continue to serve.

naturally, twice. nobody will serve. but the main thing in this law, the draft of this law, is that it expands, uh, the temporary hmm varnish expands the period, and during which a citizen can fulfill his civil duty in accordance with the constitution and, uh, serve in the army. and i think it gives more opportunities where there is a proven need. uh, the most convenient time for a person, proceeding. according to life, their circumstances to serve in the army. well , let's say a young man who graduated from high school did not enter a higher educational institution. well, it didn't work out. he can go from serving the army for 18 years and go back to

college next year, especially since he already has military service behind him. a definite advantage, either there are family circumstances associated with the birth of children, or there are sick parents and so on, you can always postpone military service, based on these life circumstances, in fact, nothing changes. ah, the deadline is extended. uh, the recognition of the draft age of 20 years was 7 years. now it is being extended to 30 years, so that, after all, such an opportunity, including elections , is provided, uh, to young people. and, of course, there were discussions and discussions continue. our federation council continues these discus. but um, it seems to me that if, uh, a law is passed in this format, then um, in my opinion look, the senator will support. although we have each senator votes at his discretion of his choice after consultation.

let’s say, with your region, but because i’m saying it again, i don’t see any reason for such excessive excessive excitement and, by the way, there is a resonance around this law thank you international life, please, your question. hello. mikhail kurakin journal of international affairs. and recently, when you were in china, you spoke about the need to make changes to international legislation, in particular in volume on the activities of military blocs, in your opinion, but are there similar gaps in international law that require well , as soon as possible to eliminate well, returning to military blocs. you started with this e colleague. well, of course, we need international legal regulation. after all, you understand what nato is doing, they want to bomb and cancer, they want libya, they want yugoslavia. it is necessary to go beyond the boundaries of your

block. uh, nato is expanding hmm and without asking anyone, thus violating, uh, stability and security in the world, because obviously this the position of the russian federation that security in the world should be unified, indivisible for all, and not just for individual elected states, so it is obvious that, and here is a serious gap that we should work on second in my opinion. uh, what would have to be, uh, urgently, uh, a legal qualification. this is forcing third countries to add sanctions to the detriment of their national interests. uh. i believe that hmm what is happening and what is happening now you see, uh, many, uh, countries, independent

countries in different parts, and the world is experiencing the most severe pressure of the threat. they are forced to blackmail, whether they want it or not to join the sanctions, which, er, seriously worsens the economic situation. uh, where uh, this uh happens. well, it requires. naturally serious. uh, legal international qualifications, it is clear that it is impossible to do this at once, especially since the west will strongly resist this. but even if it doesn’t work out, what is called tomorrow and to adopt such international acts, we need to talk about it openly and honestly and call things our own names. and i think that both international affairs and

international lawyers and legislators should start working on this. okay, how to qualify until you guess how could the international community worth thinking more? yes, this still needs to be discussed, but this is exactly such a violation of the sovereignty of independent states. this is definitely interference and internal affairs. this is definitely an unacceptable attempt by washington to spread. e its jurisdiction over other countries. and it's getting just, uh, intolerable. thank you next, let's go satellite, please your question.

hello, vadim pavlov is a companion of the near abroad, and valentina ivanovna let me ask you a question as the chairman of the inter-parliamentary assembly of the cis member states and on thursday the parliament of the republic of moldova finally approved the country's withdrawal from the commonwealth inter-parliamentary assembly, please tell us what actions you plan to take in connection with this action, how this will affect the further work of the assembly and whether moldova's withdrawal from it will affect the next session in bishkek this autumn. thank you. how can this be lefied as another anti-people anti-moldovan one step at a time. eh, and definitely not in the interests of the moldovan people. uh, just acting today hmm leaders, foreigners are definitely not interested in romanian passports and they are indifferent to them, they are not interested in taking into account. the opinion of people and indifferent to their opinion. uh, moldova has taken a course not only towards an exit with the inter-parliamentary assembly well, and other cis institutions, uh, to

the detriment of its national interests, because only deep integration with the cis countries capable of defending the sovereignty of moldova, but when the nato inspector is invited to moldova there, it is already clear that there can be no question of any sovereignty, as regards the exit procedure itself. it is spelled out in the convention. uh, hmm, bureaucratic routine work will begin now to formalize the inter-parliamentary assembly as soon as this decision of the moldovan parliament arrives. uh, my personal participation in this is not required. normal routine work is going on. i think that these procedures are usually technically occupied, but for about six months, as regards our session

of the inter-parliamentary assembly and in bishkek, the exit of moldova will not affect this in any way. actually the last few years. she practically did not take an active part in the work of the assembly. it was some kind of imitation. we have a very extensive program. e hmm sessions of the inter-parliamentary assembly we will not only hold, in fact, the session of the youth inter-parliamentary assembly itself will take place with this. we will hold a conference. e, dedicated to the 95th anniversary. e, chingiz aitmatov e. already actively working on the implementation, uh model laws and their up to 25 years of such reference documents. we must adopt 135. by the way, all parliaments are working on such model laws. these are members

of the inter-parliamentary assembly and they, of course, help in many ways to harmonize legislation, and create conditions for expanding cooperation between the cis countries both in the economic and humanitarian fields. e sphere. i have high expectations from both multilateral meetings and unilateral bilateral meetings to ask for a meeting to take place on the margins of our session. well, certainly. i am sure that e hospitable kyrgyzstan will be able to create e, favorable. uh, conditions for our work uh friendly atmosphere. and that, of course, will affect the results even more strengthen our interaction at the most. different levels of colleagues kommersant please let us have your questions. good afternoon andriy pravda newspaper kommersant and valentina ivanovna russia withdrew from the grain deal and in connection with this, and

for tomorrow ukraine convened a meeting of the nato council of ukraine and in your opinion, what risks does this carry? well, it seems to me that ukraine is now publicly announced her plans, which she covered up with a grain deal, neither ukraine nor washington were interested. the theme of providing assistance to, for countries in need of food support, they had other goals, the goals were sabotage militaristic use of the grain corridor for sabotage for terrorist acts. well , it would seem that the guarantor of the grain deal is the united nations organization personally. yes,

the chairman, he is mr. butyrysh, and so, they did not turn waves. and where did they turn to nato and naturally, nato is interested, and in for the use of the black sea. it’s understandable, why nothing will come of it and of course, nato will not deal with e. uh, the delivery of food to the countries of africa, uh, now these channels are blocked, we will not allow the use of the black sea for the delivery of weapons to ukraine for use and, as i said, yes, for sabotage and terrorist purposes. everything, when this window of opportunity closed for ukraine they urgently needed to convene a nato council for ukraine hmm well

, now their plans have become obvious, then what we talked about they just confirmed today that russia will fulfill its obligations and will. and we have the tools and capabilities for this and will deliver fertilizer grain. eh, including. and on a commercial and free basis, uh, to the african countries that the island needs it, so blame russia that we got out of one deal. uh, in and thus provoked a food crisis. this is cynical and all. today it is already obvious and understandable. e formats of such cooperation with african countries. e solutions. uh, grain delivery problems and, uh, fertilizer. uh, will be articulated at the theros of africa itself

, which will take place at the end of july. uh, st. petersburg, that is, the coming days are already colleagues. oh, and of course, they say that they are absolutely not interested in the poorest countries and they are absolutely, well, no attempts. uh, humanistic behavior was not even there. of all the e supplied to ukrainian grain, our president repeatedly spoke about this, only 3% supplied african countries . it is clear why they needed a grain deal, but the whole window is closed. i'm closed tightly until the second part of the grain deal is fulfilled, which we all promised us, uh, professing humanistic goals, we agreed on this, we hope that after all, well, common sense will come and the united nations will also fulfill it.