[000:00:00;00] at least 1.06 with the civilians who were in it, the kolyk fired several shots at the car from a kalashnikov machine gun, as a result of which the schmidt-forged who was in the victim’s car died at the scene of the crime, they gave confessions following the meeting, the chairman of the investigative committee gave a number of instructions and instructions , as well as during a working trip to new regions, for conscientious performance of official duties, professionalism and work in conditions with a risk to life, alexander bastrykin handed over to the investigators authorities departmental awards maria valieva and ekaterina shevchenko lead. infantry is infantry. it's just running in the field. a tank is a tank. this is power, there the heart beats when this armada starts up and starts to go. i went in, the settlement just got up in a column and a packet of hail arrived, the interaction took place art shelling. there is a capacity

of mercenaries to some extent tanks also stopped working. they didn't expect us to be in the city center already. for the pure was not above the earth, so that it was not from within in our history.

hello dear friends friday night. i am alexander koreevsky, it’s time to sum up the main political and economic results, the outgoing weeks at the beginning, of course, a message from taganrog, according to the ministry of defense, hit the s-200 from a converted air defense system, aiming at an elderly quarter, the russian air defense system detected and intercepted a missile on the city, debris fell. as a result of the attack , 12 people were injured nine. some of them have already been hospitalized. they are in a state of moderate severity. a woman with a traumatic brain injury underwent surgery. at the same time, the buildings were damaged. the epicenter of the explosion fell on the territory of the taganrog art museum in a neighboring apartment building, windows were broken, and later already in the region of 17-15. kyiv tried again. bombard the area well, as we can see, the west

continues to supply the kiev regime with long-range weapons, although taganrog was reportedly struck, and the strike was converted by a soviet anti-aircraft missile. well, you need to understand that it is the deliveries of western long-range missiles that unleash his own hands to shell our territory, he realizes whether the elite of the west that became an accomplice of these crimes, we will talk about this with the extraordinary plenipotentiary ambassador of russia of great britain to northern ireland, andrey kelin, andrey vladimirovich hello, another terrorist attack. it is clear that, and this is not formally e towards shadow or some other western missile, a british missile, but if there weren’t these british missiles, then the s200 would have been used to strike, probably, after all, at our military targets. although this is also not a fact, but nevertheless, and from this it turns out that in general the very fact of supplying the kiev regime with long-range missiles, huh?

it makes strikes possible if the understanding is that the western elite becomes such accomplices, and all these events in any case, i understand that the question is rhetorical, but nevertheless, maybe some conscience wakes up in any case british or what are you watching? turned on. yes, you know , something with our connection is not very good. i can't hear you very well. unfortunately, yes, uh, i understand that your first question was about. today's strikes on taganrog, if understanding about that, but no, again a communication failure. i'm sorry, i can't do that when it's turnkey. we hear you, we hear you, please. question please repeat

the question. the next one is these strikes on taganrog. they became possible, among other things, of course, due to the fact that the west is supplying long-range missiles, in particular british missiles. is there any understanding in the west, do they realize that they become accomplices in these crimes, or do they pretend that nothing is happening everything is fine about the fact that they are becoming here the essence of a participant in crimes. here, they try to completely ignore these issues, but in practice, and those attacks that are inflicted on our cities on russian infrastructure do not receive any reflection in e, the press and the media, here and vice versa , respectively, but the strikes that are erroneously received some destruction, how were the waters? and as for the destruction, which, it turns out , attracts general attention here, the discussion

takes place and, uh, such a one-sided coverage in its entirety. yes andrey vladimirovich but you know, i just wanted to talk to you, it's very important. for some reason i was surprised. eh, this fact, what is it about? i mean, this is a letter from a british millionaire. john mapin. it's authoritative. e man in britain is better. eh, you know it's wonderful. here he wrote a letter. uh, solve the british prime minister's sunuku, where did i even read mine with surprise. i thought maybe there were some wrong translations, but he calls in this letter to abandon the suicidal support of ukraine, he says, that the russians have their own philosophy with the russians you need to talk, and not send them a rocket. and what do you think, why did such a letter become possible, and moreover, it was in the public domain, so they wanted it, uh, publicity, how can this be interpreted? well,

john mappen himself is a businessman. in the field of investing, not very large and not very famous. but this is actually another person who not only understands, that is , immorality, but from what london is doing pushing kiev to escalate. well , actually, he is not afraid to express his a point of view that is very different from the mainstream and this applies. eh, generally a broad issue on which he speaks. this is not only from his own, but in the house of lords, he does not sit, and as far as i understand, he is to the right of the ruling circles of great britain and not worse. well, therefore, it is not surprising that the official government. they did not react in any way to the fact that this letter was a common wash to us, the prime minister of the territory of great britain yes , and the british media did not cover it. but, that is the supplier of uh his majesty is not considered authoritative e with a businessman. we are now in britain, i understand correctly, his company, in my opinion,

has been supplying jewelry to the court since 1700 of some shaggy year. e royal, or our colleagues messed up something. it was our colleagues who messed up something, he owns it. uh, a little castle on the coast of the west there in great britain that has been converted into a hotel and is hosting, uh, guests. that's about the fact that he is a supplier of the diamonds. i hear for the first time. well , this is probably some kind of confusion god is with him, but to me it seemed that it was, you know, the very fact of such letters, because if we talk to our people a lot about it, as in britain , e, they cover it, well, it’s clear, you tell, but this change to hmm is on the level. eh, let's say the estebashment, which, as a matter of fact. uh, if that is, you said that maine is still fighting to the last ukrainians. i understand correctly. saved, right? well, how do

you say? in general, in this here it is impossible, yet, to talk about changes in the mood in society according to a sociological survey held regularly. count uk has such a specialized organization here, and , well, they still show that more than two- thirds of the americans, the british are in favor of increasing sanctions pressure on our country and increasing the supply of weapons. it's somewhere e percent. well, now 72 is somewhere, and for increasing the supply of the expression 64, and it’s more difficult to talk about changes in instructions in political circles. in general, some dissatisfaction, but indeed here you can observe, well, they caused a big resonance a rather critical statement by secretary of defense wallace. here is the relationship of zelensky's behavior although he used to be considered a 10 staunch supporter about his supporter. and many agreed that they were dangerous here. well , i also note that

the decisions of the american authorities on cluster munitions were perceived very ambiguously, and almost 40% felt that the government could not register with electrification with this person. well, that is, we understand that after all, some kind of fermentation appears there, but, nevertheless, the british foreign office declares of their non-involvement in the recent undermining of the crimean bridge, this topic was also somehow covered. a lot has been written about this, but , most likely, of course, as victorious e-relations, here, in general, the british really consider their victory as well, well, i’ll only note it well for us. it is known that even before the start of e, a special operation was trained by ukrainian submariners, and in ukraine it was in the delta from the dnieper, and then now they are preparing, as well as ukrainian poets already on the territory of the mines of scotland in one of the bay. it's called lol. yu we

know about it. this. by the way, the very bay where the northern canvases were first collected for wiring them e is such a symbolic place for us. i know that the russian picketing authorities are now carefully studying, and the materials on the items are being identified, how did this happen. what means were used for this. well, they will give it an appropriate assessment. i think that it is not necessary to guess trying their conclusions. andrey ivanovich well, about the competent authorities, only britain is statement of the open head of mi-6, uh, for the russians to give their country in order to end the war as they think , and so on, in general, what kind of nonsense is this, and where, well, the impudence of you on the other side to recruit like this people in the open. what is this, a crisis of intelligence services in britain, how can this be interpreted at all? i would consider this as another episode of e-information confrontation. here, in general, there were a lot of public statements, including, and the importance of the so-called cognitive effect

is a broad concept. well, here in general it is about an attempt to incur in the amount of the father of e, to strengthen mutual suspicions to bring him into fear of harm to opponents at the expense of such information groups. and in general, there is nothing new in this, because. eh, actually. uh, mr. boer, as director, literally repeated what i had said weeks ago , cia director william behrens, and in my speech at the british site. well, the fact that any of the familiar people will see insincerity, and in sentences of the level this is understandable, and the british special services are e with their cynical attitudes, and to the top we people feel good known. they, well, also happened in particular. e with violins. i would note here, and he is promoting such an agenda. well, we still don't know what happened. not with the violinist himself, not with his

daughter julia at our request. uh about, uh hmm report the location of some consular assistance. and so i will note no answers they receive. also, that the boers, by the way, were addressed when speaking in prague speech had questions about this you were asked about. uh, as if the dubious authority of the british. well, i violinists he simply. stu walked away from the answer to find his complicated stuff. yes, to answer something , apparently there is nothing uh adrianovich and certainly the event of this week is the russia africa summit . and it is clear that the british were also active on this continent at one time. well, it's mostly south africa. yes, but nonetheless . in general, uh, this is the behavior of the west, in particular britain towards these countries. are there any, i don’t know, changes in the strategy in this matter, whether the british elite or the expert community are discussing what they are doing with africa

you do, russia will increase there, the influence of china is increasing, the influence of france is already being driven there to lose it. e from one country to another, but there is something in britain like how to behave like a united king in this matter. here, of course, they were very zealous about the samitra. and russia, africa, but carefully, though it was monitored and the results and that's it. the rest i try to present it, as uh, as possible from a more negative angle, but the interests of the other are interested in what colossal work was carried out, and on the eve of all the rivals themselves, only the british. here's a little list i made for myself. actually, two visits to the macron by the president of the macron, there, and the chancellor who committed it was there. uh, that's the most vice president from the united states over there. uh, went to the hospital for her from the british. there was the minister of foreign affairs cloverly, as well as two of his deputies, and all of them, as i understand it

, twisted the arms of the african leader a and the african diplomat so that the shadows would ride on nothing themselves. however, it didn’t work out and really. and here is the success itself, e, up to which today evidence of that russia's position in africa is very strong. and our opponents, and they are very worried about this, are squeezing out russia for now, well , they can’t do it at all. thank you very much , of course, and it will not work, because the russians. well, we are trying to cooperate normally, while western countries are trying to pump out resources. thank you very much for taking the time to remind you, we talked with the ambassador extraordinary and plenipotentiary of russia from great britain to northern ireland england kellin. this week, the west continued to think about how to get out of the situation associated with our exit from the grain deal. about it. we spoke with

vladimir chizhov, first deputy chairman of the federation council committee on defense and security. vladimir alekseevich hello, thank you for finding the time for us, but also one of the main topics of the week, except for the african summit, but all the more so since a lot of attention was also paid to supplying countries with grain. well, the grain deal, not in itself. i understand, but the consequences here is the echo after we canceled this transaction, and yet. uh, well rustle brought a lot. our. cancellation and our former partners are not up to now and are clearly in. well , shocked, probably not the right word, but in an uncomfortable position, and this is an emergency themselves, which ukraine nato was going to there. i don't even know if it's possible to talk about it in any practical way. maybe you will comment on something they have identified there, such a more significant one or some way out. i haven't seen any

e-message signs. well, i, in general, i will also start with the main thing. and our decision uh to exit from this deal, and it was no surprise to anyone, as you know, russia extended its participation three times. in it i will not now dwell on the motives that prompted us to make these decisions last month, but as they say, our patience. it, as everyone knew, was not infinite, and it disappeared. so, uh, some uh emotions, therefore, a priori, they were inappropriate. everyone knew perfectly well what, how and why. well, i must say that e is the greatest surge of emotions. he was, of course, in

kiev but i think that home mode is due to its intellectual limitations. he did not count on the fact that russia would change its mind, but on the fact that the west, by all means, would come to his aid in this matter, including, uh, sending, for example, to the navy to uh, escort the ships that were exported the remaining, uh, ukrainian grain, which did not happen. well, uh, if uh, i uh counted from the local let's u advise this situation. and if someone in kiev listened to them. i would advise you to read, uh, matryov's convention 36 years, which quite severely

restricts access to the black sea through the straits, and not the black sea warships that held it. and so, what, now the european union declares that it is able, but this is obvious, of course, as they say, they represent wishful thinking. and that they are ready to withdraw all ukrainian grain, and along these corridors of solidarity, the corridor of solidarity is, first of all, land routes. well, trucks, because, uh, many millions of tons of grain, they still can’t take out. it's a physical daunting task as far as railway from the lithuanians. they suggested using portlaypeds.

and if you look at the map, then with ukraine and the path to lithuania lies through poland and in poland sorry, another uh track, zheleznodorozhnaya, therefore, every train that would go from ukraine to lithuania would have to change wheelsets twice, because on ukraine and lithuania from the time of the soviet union left e, gauge, or even russia. and in poland, of course, there has always been another. even in the era of socialism, so here are the specific aspects of this situation, if want logistical geographical ones that, uh, explain the current situation. now with regard to ukrainian grain.

and it is known that several countries of uh central eastern europe include the same poland, which, as you know, is the loudest of all, a is trying to act as a defender of ukrainian interests, but, uh, poland is forced to take into account the interests of its own farmers. and these uh five countries wrote collective letters. i have those who he was in the open, access an official letter to the european commission in a proposal to extend, and this ban on electricity supplies ukrainian grain, but on their market, and which end on september 15 for an additional period. this caused another hysteria in kiev

, but i think that as the conflict develops. and i mean in ukraine, hysterics from kiev will be heard more and more often, but vladimir alekseevich but you see the so-called corridors about solidarity, and on the other hand there is a proposal, but the european union that they seem to be ready for it, yes, not let this grain be unloaded in transit countries, but simply transport it somewhere to the port and there rotterdam somewhere else and actually export. or maybe they somehow agree on this hypothetically. this may be a question of who will do this, how much will it cost and who needs it? e ukrainian grain , you know this myth that ukraine is the bread basket of the whole world. he persistently propagated and not only kiev,

but his uh, as they say, uh friends. well, in fact, uh, our uh, the leadership and personally vladimir vladimirovich putin voiced these figures, that, and grain production on ukraine is less than five percent of the world , while russian production is under 20%. that is, four times more, therefore, to say that ukraine feeds the whole world. this is a clear exaggeration. well, i must say it's not yesterday. when i was born, i will remind you that even in the soviet union there was a, but such a version that ukraine feeds the entire soviet union but that was not true then, and uh, is not true today. well, as for the quality of grain,

i will give such a detail, and 17 million hectare. that is, most of the arable land in ukraine belongs to non-ukrainian farmers for a long time. and from that moment. i don't remember the exact year, but it was somewhere. uh, not like that. they passed a law a long time ago, uh, allowing foreigners to buy land, hence, uh, big american multinationals. uh, including a diploma, ah, mansantali and grown uh grain. with the use banned in europe, i emphasize this is banned in europe ah-ah in genetically modified additives and, uh, a chemical, so this is a grain. well maybe the poorest

countries. uh, ready to take him and they will not be here, uh indiscriminately asserts, but the fact that uh in the world market will be treated with suspicion. as for the poorest countries, the russia-africa forum that took place this week, and it is clear that the central theme there was general cooperation, but, nevertheless, uh, the food security of these countries of the poorest countries. and what exactly the westerners were pedaling on, that supposedly the cancellation of our deal, so we will starve to death, and there the inhabitants of africa, after all, well, this is a frank lie, of course, but also on the other hand we understand that we have taken a step towards our african partners. and what do you think, can the africans still try, and somehow, well, not put pressure, of course , on the west, while the west is pressing on them, but nevertheless influence the west and

in general return to this topic. we said we are ready to reopen the deal if our demands are met. you are with such a development of events. do you believe, in general, whether it is real in theory, at least we are talking about our readiness. back in that deal as both a certain concession, but because russia has repeatedly stated, including in recent times, that russia is able to start these things with ukrainian showmanship, but with its own grain. thank god we have a harvest year in a row. it is high and we can determine 50-55 million tons for export there, according to the forecasts of the ministry of agriculture, and another thing is that the european union

, stating that grain and food supplies do not fall under quotas at all. in fact , he is doing everything to prevent our export of food, including the palest countries. in what way this manifests itself, firstly , the russian agricultural bank, which is the main bank for financing both production and, accordingly, the export of agricultural products, it is disconnected from the elevator under sanctions. this is the first second, ours, and the ships are bulk carriers, which are grain carriers, you can call them that, but they are not allowed into european ports. third on them. uh, very difficult to get insurance is exorbitant. uh, it turns out, well, a whole range of plus fertilizers

is our fertilizer. this figure was called 262,000 tons of our mineral fertilizers, and are actually arrested in warehouses, and in the ports of the european union, primarily in latvia and the netherlands a, and we are not given the opportunity to find out, even in order to supply the poorest african countries for free, we are ready not only to supply them free of charge, but even because take them there at your own expense. well, uh, a secret, he, of course, is trying to change something, but his strength, apparently, is not enough, but i won’t judge about desire. well, yes, it is difficult , but nevertheless, about africa, i would like to clarify, that is, i think that the voice westerners will not listen to africa here. i understand correctly. uh, i think

the westerners are going to have to have the voice of africa anyway because they can't afford to wall themselves off from africa in today's world. nobody can afford this. this is the first. second they certainly counted on the failure itself. this is russia africa, this failure did not happen, they did everything so that, uh, the number of heads of state there would be minimal. uh, they did something. in any case, 49 are represented. there it is strange, that is, in fact. uh, except for three or four. uh, the country of africa well, not the coat of arms, for example, there is

a good reason they are not allowed there. very interesting, thank you very much. i think that indeed the voice of africa and the voice of other countries in the region in the west will have to listen to go, it will have nowhere to go. thanks a lot.