silovi, which means blockaded, burned government buildings, anything is normal. this is a democratic process. here the man made a statement. and secondly, what is there in general. hmm, it means it was terrible. he says he didn't call for his supporters to get out of there. although his advisers told him this, and in your vot, the leaders of the democratic nobility in various countries in the soviet space, who , e. they just led their countries to disintegration to warriors and everything else. you didn't want to tell them that maybe call home, otherwise the elections passed, it seems, as if everything was respected according to the procedures and it doesn’t raise any questions, of course, it’s obvious that this is absolutely, uh, hypocrisy, but uh, you need to not just laugh at it. you need to understand the historicity of this moment, because it is absolutely accurate. uh, said he's fading away. this is where the two-party spirit is something else from a technological point of view. he very clearly described, here the problem is not only. in

technology, not only in what has taken place there since the nineties, it is a historical process related to the future of the liberalism. liberalism comes to that point of no return, when this is its not perception of anything around. believe me, there are no more people who are immune to the opinions of others, no longer tolerate, in general, alternative points of view than the liberals, there are so many of them and they are related to the fascists that they don’t even imagine this question, the fascists believe that some kind of biological people are exceptional , the liberals believe that according to their convictions they are exceptional, and all the rest are not people at all. and if they don't agree with them ideas that want to give everyone freedom, then they must be destroyed altogether, because they prevent everyone from being free and enjoying all the delights of a liberal life. they have now reached a point that was not there before. before that, you might not agree with them. they could criticize you. intrigues to build anything, but you had the opportunity to practice practically. donald trump's activity today - it's

not just one donald trump taken separately is a representative of a very large number of the us population, perhaps the majority. if not majority, at least not minorities. such a strange situation is developing there, and by this act, they actually proclaim that from today they do not agree. you can call yourself republicans. you can call yourself a democrat. you can call yourself whatever you want there , but if you do not accept our agenda, you no longer have the right to engage in political activities in this country. we need from this you asked a question, said what to do with it, when to be with it. i think no matter what how will this lawsuit end? i think it doesn’t matter who wins the election, whether it’s biden trump or someone else there, and there’s absolutely no way to see the confident and undoubted victory of botha from the candidates, this

country will be divided to an even greater extent. in my opinion, this time it will also be divided, also under the conditions of a full day of legitimization of all political institutions that will actually exist in the country at this moment at the national level, and therefore, what you said about the fact that we should recognize this, yes, what you proposed about the collective statement of various countries, you know. it would be even more effective. than completely meaningless statements from western countries regarding ours. well, it's not politics. why because these statements are statements of one military-political bloc, all in our case. these would be representatives of various continents of various civilizations, which show that you are now in the minority more than all of humanity, so you can't anymore. this is not to change something there, so after that any of their statements already sounded ridiculous, because you are the kind

to declare something to us, if you have more than one of the candidates sitting there, the second candidate is sitting there, maybe plant too. well, not his son, because the ukrainians finance something there. it's just some kind of madness and not and yes absolutely. uh, hmm, not typical, like in the past, but natural from the point of view of the development of this ideology and the development of liberalism, the situation. and when you also clearly pointed out very well what money stands out there. he says if we don't stop russia, the countries will understand that it is possible to invade somewhere there. i thought he was completely sincere that he invaded his country invaded, where not getting everywhere, in general, he does not even perceive this as an opportunity for discussion. why because liberalism is also very characterized by a feeling of absolute exclusivity on the one hand and the conviction that we defeated everyone and destroyed the entire 19th century, the church was destroyed. in

communism was destroyed in the 20th century in the western world , fascism was destroyed before that, and they are convinced that it’s from us that we don’t discuss it. the question is , what should we do with these second-rate ones? how to organize their life and you know how the example of elengergnu said about words. ah, bernard alivi. eh, here. he even had a slightly different ending. it's just ridiculous what he said, he says, russia is a colonial power, so africa go and support zelensky, that is, we are a colonial power. he is african, he says go and support question. and he that, began to philosophize, that these, but he believes, this is the whole philosopher. yes, it's zero. he absolutely is. at least one work that is very banal is actually trivial secondary bananas, and moreover, there is reason to suggest that even what you can read is not written by him at all, because, most likely, he resorted to services. literary slaves

also know all this, that even i am the only one who wrote books for him there, uh, he uh, he he was such a joke they wrote there and did not even re-read the book. yes and when he published, but she bluntly he talked about the sex life of hemorrhoids. well, of course, it never happened. and this is this book that she published, uh, he didn’t even read such nonsense, so he didn’t do it, just. uh, it's a product. it's a product that, uh, has a very strong influence on politics and the media. it's everywhere all the time. there are such people influence. so those who are influenced even more stupidly than he is. the rich also help. well, there is no problem that i have completed it even more stupidly, yes, at the end of this topic. just wanna say oh what we should be prepared for completely different. it seems to me that after the elections, the united states of america will have to work with them completely different.

well, no matter what the tension of this time has been, i am absolutely convinced that this will lead to very big changes in the european continent and we will face the fact that there will be so many vacuums that we could fill, but for this you need, oh what did you say that you need to come from the program and you need to come to them with your project, which for them may be in reality attractive and to this, we must be ready and finally. third. we must stop being afraid to go beyond the world outlined for us with our own language with our own rules and principles that have fettered us, and we are trying to use them to defeat our rival as soon as we go beyond this. i'm sure everything will work out great for us. so, i guess i'll start. from here, so to speak, the curious are the case, really against trump. a. indeed, as henry said. they have there 20 20, 21 years passed under the sign or pogroms, arson of government buildings. there's a lot that the police station is curious about that judge in the trump case. district

of columbia federal judge tanya chatskaya, what did she say about comparing bm's performances to these riots. e with what happened on january 6th. she says that it’s impossible to compare. january 6 was worse, what would it be or was it, mostly peaceful, as they said, the bridge was sculpting, yes, yes, yes, yes, it’s all the same with them and they said a performance, that means people for their civil rights. and it was a militant very dangerous crowd that really threatened our democracies. this is the judge who made this kind of statement, most likely protests. so to say, there the appeal of a more real body on the replacement of a judge will hardly be accepted, by the way, the judge there is a lot more than noted. she had already run one case there, she gave the participants on january 6 more sentences than she had passed the charges. well, by the way, maria butila , too, she gave her such a term, such other political judge, as by the way, the prosecutor, who runs the trump case? this jack smith who worked in gaya. so here is the kosovo tribunal, and here we really really

want to denounce them from here. i, as it were, also admit that the america that taught me, or rather, studied it, was not at all the same as it is now. it's definitely perfect, but on the other hand. let's look at this matter from the other side. seriously , what is happening is that a big transformation of the world is taking place, which means that in the united states they also have two irreconcilable americas , and in the elite sense and throughout the thickness further society, what should they do in a democratic way - this problem is not resolved, well, absolutely. would have found a civil war, or some other way. i don't know communication which time it will always solve this question. well, not forever for a long period of time. such questions are worth it. well, in particular during the civil war, by the way, there was a similar contradiction. and even then, the largest number of victims of the americans was then, well, they really have nowhere to go to the military conflict , they are forced to imprison trump if they want win. well, indeed, i said that

if donald trump wins the election, or it’s not a fact that they won at all, how would they win , they need now to move on, to choose one of the development paths. globalists in one way or another. it doesn't matter if it's a truncated global scale or a full scale. this is another conversation or a way of national development. that is, one president from the national development party of another football party cannot replace each other every 8 or 4 years. it's pointless, some should put each other in jail. in this sense, the desire of the byte administration to imprison trump is unimportant, so to speak, it doesn’t matter how it looks, that it contradicts the constitution, it is quite logical that the whole world is now in this situation. and what makes the united states stand out here, of course, is not the topic of what kind of legal system they have there. there they are to themselves at the best of times. it's kind of a pretty good way to tell the problem is that for a variety of reasons, er, the history of the most

recent years. they really have a unique situation. in the sense that these america, they are more or less varieties of great. this is not typical for china, where there is also a complex elite, not for india, where, by the way, also. be healthy, there are internal problems, but still, what they have is approximately equal. both the people and the elite, and the elite with their weight does not mean that they can be counted by the piece. but the weight of the elite is about the same, of course, one of the options pushes them into conflict. so i remember on solovyov, we discussed this, dmitry gennadievich, that one of the options for a civil conflict or civil war is simply repression. that's when the second country can't respond or doesn't respond for some reason. well, it's just depression. so it's like they're trying to solve it now. well , not the same big blood, not so big, maybe reputational losses, but nonetheless. here is the thing. this is an attempt to solve fundamental questions. where to go beyond america once again the process does not solve in any democratic way, it really solves a very important task now. it is necessary to cancel one of the parties, well, to ban in this sense what

makes a canoe, because it's disgusting and that's the administration, but it's quite logical. well, there is no other way out, moreover, trump will come to power. everyone advises him the same thing , they even talked about it, let's say to death, so to speak, to the form of security that they will come, if he will surely gain there at all. he will recruit such people who were not even approved by the senate, and now, to eat them in the other direction, because there is no other way out. and by the way, we won’t be able to talk, nikitay, here’s fashion doing stupid things, what does he think is possible at all with america as long as this internal conflict is not resolved there. after all. note very revealing was the case, which was almost a civil war case. kayla house rhythm when he shot louder. he was tried and acquitted of a very revealing reaction to the trial. and none of those who believed that recoil riton house should be planted believed it, and no one believed it for life. the decision of the court earlier in america was impossible. moreover, now they deserve some witnesses about violations biden some witnesses in the case, trump,

no one believes a nasty country. everything somehow seems to be everything no one is what it seems, here is one of the defenders of hunter biden and biden. so to say he did said that the son of the then vice president's president was selling the illusion of access to this very jubaiden. that is, they are all around, solid illusions, simulators, nothing real, no, not well, as it is, of course. and what about the alien ships, and it was. well, when it starts in all seriousness. i therefore ufo biological material. do you understand at all. and now, actually, there's a serious one going on. and so to speak, in fact, massacres, in order to accuse the other side of the fact that it was you who provoked the discussion of ufos because you want to embed this budget item, no, it’s you, because you want to increase another article, that is, in fact, the dispute everything is already to this, that is, no one trusts anyone the circle of the state duty is nothing real. no, of course, it should be decided with the help of a non-democratic process of force. well , by the way, if it’s about us for

a second about ideology, we, too, similar things exist in society. namely, in our country, someone constantly argues, from cunning plans or cunning plans, in short, we definitely have something for real , in fact, that what happened is someone's cunning plan. in fact, this is not this, but this is a cunning plan of that, and this is not all. and this is in fact, he agreed with this, but this one was thrown. well, in our country it’s not on the elite sea, but on the domestic one, i also say that the elites - it ’s there that they understand very well what they are fighting for in america and among the people of faith in institute. no. we have this thing here, in fact, it is connected, of course, not with the fact that it has split society. and it is connected with the fact that we do not have our own cultural autonomy of internal civilization, so to speak in ideology. i would say exactly that here is a complete cultural independent cultural autonomous representation of one's own primacy. this is 70% ideology. everything else can be read from our great historical authors and you can come with this, in fact. we have a major

problem right now. well i understand what it takes technologically, something needs to be done at a ruble price for everything. it needs a central question. here it is dilogical, it precisely begins with cultural autonomy, because those are the people who make culture. sorry, eighty percent considers everything secondary. they take everything from there. there are serious problems with this. i really want to come to some film studio not to mosfilm that the koran, as it were, and everyone there in general, from the producer to the assistant and cameraman, give a year conditionally, just right away in biden's style baydanovski act. well, because it's just a word, because then they think. yes, yes, this is a trial period . you see, something like this. well, once again, this is all from this, as it were , and with this you can come, that the chinese want something african, because i literally have no china for another 15 seconds and i can see the peculiarities of my history from this alternative cultural and civilizational picture antizap will not work. and this means

that these are not only our capabilities. it's all our duty, well, let's talk in this case of cultural counterrelation one of our great philosophers, and a real philosopher, and not wearing a white coat at the right time, nikolai yakovlevich danilevsky, described this problem as he called it . completely distort the input of the historical development and upbringing of our country, which we are now witnessing. uh, already a few years ago, one of our quite talented well-known journalists threw into the public discourse the term global russians. it's kind of like according to the passport and by origin, maybe russians. well, maybe the russians. they know what roles, but uh? those who see themselves and self-position themselves as citizens of the world, like him today for six months at the ballet, then

for another six months here and in conversations, either there in interviews or in public space , they constantly use this tracing paper from english, this is a country. well, to understand that here the country is our country, the alien side is countered for this. we also have, as with the expression, a common place, which is common place english that it is necessary to translate correctly into russian is a common truth, but we have already sunk down to the banal. uh, copying english e-bolts in journalism, and there were enough mastitis of journalists and thinkers , well, they already get to such a simulation of shouting and monkeying that we already forget, in general, the cultural paradigm of our own e-civilization, so it is really necessary, uh, to make an accurate diagnosis to understand in general where we want to go. we want these, but cultural paradigms. both words are not russian. why do we need a word trend, when there is, excellent russian word trend speed patriotism. let's

call the telescope a far-seeing rocket then , there was such an idea, vladimir vladimirovich called himself, by the way, it sounds great. yes, he already owned the phrase i hate. it's a disgusting foreign word. a slide or a beautiful russian geo-positive is beautiful. well , indeed, language and thinking are two such cardinal and important phenomena that form the worldview of the world of human sensations. what can we say? that's the same african countries. after all, the situation there is , in fact, very difficult, practically with the exception of a strange mushroom of mono-ethnic mono-national nation- states. uh, there are practically none in africa, in south africa alone there are six official languages, what does this reflect? what's there?

uh, well, this phenomenon is called, given the local realities, tradealism, where one representatives of one cultural ethnic community keep everything under control and because of this there is a constant series of wars in coups, which are. naturally, they are launched by the special services of certain interested states, but as a leaven. they use a different time that feels a little left out and natural. here. e. how to broadcast e and e to conduct a dialogue with african states for the same complex vices of interweaving inter-ethnic inter-confessional contradictions. yes, here it is necessary, of course, to use , indeed, our experience, but a multinational state, where sometimes national issues are not always resolved, but, nevertheless, e, the phenomenon of intercultural interethnic interfaith dialogue it is we appeared states in africa, some states existed a couple of thousand years ago. well, if we are talking about the queen of sheba, yes, but if

we are talking about the african continent as massive, i am leading to what, and why did we decide that statehood, as such, in the form that the european colonialists saw, is adequate for people, because that the division of even state borders between american states. it not artificial, of course. this she led to multimillion-dollar victims, for example, in the middle east where all the arabs. and the same principle is completely different, but for some reason we have already driven us into this one, yes, it’s completely, completely different, maybe and maybe. it is necessary at least to begin to hear the people who live there, especially those who studied at rudyn, as regards philosophers. here bernard, i'm already drying out, joking that this is a first-class philosopher, because he goes to the first class at the school of philosophy, but

i won't even say that about bernard levy, but usually say that the head is an ordinary simulator of philosophers is a simulator of a thinker, but this is a phenomenon. unfortunately, it is characteristic of the social thought of european states, if you look at the history of philosophy in western europe starting. probably from the goustok-comte we see a solid or a gradation. well, we have already reached structuralism, where is a person, it’s just that human nature develops to the level of some kind of there, in my opinion, an elez or an erection was a reasonable concept, where a person is already completely unqualified. it's not even more sprightly once a simulator. it's not even could do everything with brain prostheses. it's much worse. there is already a complete erasure of the human e, the totality as an object as e, probably, one measured the paradigm of value, so why be surprised by such talking heads like schwab, like many others, there is no total degradation, but what is happening in the united states but this is one of the symptoms. eh, this one.

well, probably, indeed, the decline of europe, as spenger wrote. well, in america - this is actually one of the outgrowths of western european civilization, if we talk about sex united states, of course, it was rather anti-paropa initially. well, they a lot considered themselves from the european cultural-historical type of violent rulers, fucking theory er, with their own superiority. e, and. uh, again, even racism is british. uh, in the united states it was also implemented. quite to yourself. well, in quotes successfully, so it's probably really one of the uh, maybe a side branch. e even the dead end of the development of the european historical and cultural historical type, but nevertheless, exactly the same thing happens there. degradation. another issue in which you are increasingly concerned about me. uh, what will happen, it’s really good later, really the revolution makes an active, aggressive , close-knit minority, maybe there were not 2,000 bolsheviks, but 2,000 and a half. well, general jackson kamino scala also did not have armies of millions. however, for almost 5 years, a civil

war raged. yes, the reasons were somewhat different , the realities were different. and now most likely. i agree with the opinion. uh, colleagues, that it will be a war of all against all and a pogrom er, the riots in los angeles after the hurricane showed this clearly ba street gangs, which are already actively opposing themselves. e place to the authorities. just, uh, they will start a war against everyone against everyone and win the one who will be more united, who will have some understanding and is most afraid, just this globalist elite of those very rednecks of those very right-wingers who came out of the capitol, who then with with their personal civilian weapons, but walked through the streets of american cities, declaring that we are the people. here is the erasure of the traditional class. destruction as a phenomenon uh, in fact, a reduction. uh, so the establishment of flat-capitalism. this is probably one of the vectors for the development of the united states. and the way out. well, really, either in civil for all against all or rallying the population

against some external enemy. and this means a big global war, probably, i will say a strange idea that they do not require that they agree with me. america is old? like europe is gone, the fact of the matter is america is the old statehood that hasn't passed necessary update. look we've never looked at it like that. we have always proceeded from the fact that old europe exists, because the time spent on this earth by people who are native speakers of languages ​​is calculated as a captive number of centuries, but if you consider statehood, italy is a new state formation, germany is a new state formation of france a little more complicated, but still the passage through the revolution changes new state formations. but britain and america do not have russia new state education from the seventeenth year america is one of the oldest state structures, but even the electoral ones that she will involuntarily

be forced to oppose through a period of the most difficult transformations. whether you like it or not, well, the last time there was a civil war in the united states. yes, that's an update, and even then it was not an update. as such it was. that is exactly why it is easier for us in europe to disintegrate, because the states exist as a state. it's completely different. andrew is a completely different matter. we are not saying that the strong is easier. we are talking about the fact that we have always treated america as a new empire, and it is just one of the oldest existing empires. that is why our analysis contains, it seems to me, a methodological error. it is interesting, but then we are talking, for example, in africa, many others. we do not see the reason, so what is happening, and the reasons are a human fact , why, for example, what is happening now in why is the personal fault of the macrons his personal

fault, because this dream is a stupid impolite ill-mannered person who shows this not only not with the president of our country at all. well, look, for example, how he behaved in africa. i don't want to deal with the problem of electricity at the university. this is the seventeenth year.

but really today we are on the way to leaving yes, the next blow is a complete fish that we just made is to transfer all our resources that were in mali figurines in faso to niger, because nigeria has the same configuration as in other countries. this martan is absolutely right, but the problems of the system.

let's fly, quickly the territory is dangerous. we were already here walking with you in the morning, what is happening?

we will always work well, but he is groovy, of course. the day, of course, should be a holiday, because the polka where i served, he is the heirs who were studying in the thirty-fifth year of the soviet union and why i am talking about this, because today i wanted to look at the internet there, because 25 years ago i have books published. according to the history of our regiment was not shown. well, how did the captain receive the first soviet diploma there? then he came to france and created the structure of an adviser from the soviet union. and then our poles - this is the most senior paratroopers.