the west is unable to understand russia is preparing for a civilizational conflict that could last for decades. they see us as savages constantly accusing revanchism, then colonism next to them themselves are still trying the whole world

usa britain france actually retains its power, former colonies of western analysts and thinkers impose the notorious liberal democracy on the world, as dozens of wars were unleashed on the highest form of civilization revolutions killed millions people, while the same us trump is already openly gagging, to eliminate it without further explanation, but the main thing is the only main one of the universal planetary vyshiberi. the world left a threat to the world in the eyes of russia in particular, because we are too conservative and not ready to accept their perverted values. you know what i 'm going to tell you, stop looking back and stop being soft, gentle, kind. here is the situation in

nigeria the colonial powers of france the united states is frankly trying to continue the impudent policy in africa, financial structures stop completely dark countries that the peoples of the nigers spoke out in favor of his just liberation struggle. german french and others, the bastard joyfully shouts that he will supply and supply ukraine with a long-range and medium-range missile. well, they still have an average radius. this is what the french are proud of. i don't understand, for example why we shouldn't provide all kinds of military technical assistance to the niger people and their just struggle. provide everything he needs in order to drive the french invaders bratsky close with his territory. i i just don’t really understand this, chernorossia should be free. that is, how they joke there, but we are real, that is, why what do we with them

what they need they have there intervention is expected to supply them with air systems. i'm sure there are many who are not dukes. eh, trained. how to work with our systems? i'm just convinced i feel, i just feel that everyone knows how crews are ready for very tanned people. shki and close was not in africa. they were still once colonies. why are we afraid of a direct confrontation with the americans, but they are dying in batches in ukraine? what to be ashamed of, they are not afraid to supply any weapons. so you need to put siri with all these weapons that you need to resolve this issue, any weapons that are needed.

enough wants you to seriously butt heads. if you please, i also do not understand at all how long we will tolerate this violation of rights and freedoms. people in europe when we start with our muslim brothers why should we endure? why do we have all these, in fact, some kind of sweden and other countries that speak frankly, hostile to islam. i believe that from our territory. in the same way, why do we tolerate those who wage open open war against orthodoxy? those countries that support i propose tougher, but inside the country i have, of course, too. excuse me, i am very glad that we finally have a textbook there, in which i hope a reasonable

assessment of the eightieth ninety 2000 is given, but i have a question , i know sergey sergeevich well kravtsov sergey sergeevich please tell me why he is so disliked by nvp why are we should be played in obzh within which there may be a number of disciplines called nvp and so is it optional? what do you not understand? what time we live and we will retrain obzh teachers, but veterans of military operations can come and share their experience of military operations. what kind of game is this , what is it? maybe enough already in the schools there should be basic military training. not abstract obzh oh, my god, but initial military training and not optional girls

sisters men, sacred duties of a sacred duty and not optional. and so as it was in soviet times, you don't like it. this is your problem for the soviet experience. our country still exists, so let's still not communicate with liberal-minded circles, school teachers near moscow's elite educational institutions and parents who can't get out of the ruble to nice in any way are worried, and with the people with the russian, and he will say the right gdp so it was understandable and the creatures of the transbaikal, which need two veterans of the limbs at the time. fight for our homeland, here are two we can

really plant, because they beat, and the rest can not be touched. let the rest sit down. certificate official position and get out of the authorities then there will be compliance sergey alexandrovich first, i will react about the meaning of the words about nigeria, here's an onigirin for me. well, you want, nigeria is not. we just don't do it historically somehow in the soviet union. well let it be so. if you really want to,

yes, but uh, the accent will come now, by the way, yes, there’s nothing like that, there’s nothing like that, and about about just that, uh the realities of certainty to go. yes , even in the information picture. look, we 're all the same. e. at first , at least yes, all western headlines were removed . the coup is not a coup, my friends. and the democratic revolution is an anti-colonial democratic revolution against the authorities, which are its people's democratic republic, like the republic of korea, which is against the authorities, who robbed it for the sake of the colonial regime, which, so to speak, yes, here it is corrupt corruption, there is unmeasured. if you want to search for coup, and here is our all means of information. i understand, just used to shoot other people's headlines, this question stirs it begins, including with technical details. yes, do not shoot endless other people's headlines, and formulate your own democratic folk meanings. against

the post-colonial predatory corrupt regime, so to speak. it seems to me that it would be right, by the way, one of the problems. here, in this case, it is absence. uh, media connection. here on the form. e in africa russia by the way, very good forum. in my opinion, so to speak, it really did pass on time and powerfully, and , uh, very cool. although perhaps its humanitarian dimension. i would expand a little, because our value orientations very often coincide with the african states. and the imposition of this kind of western ideology, it is there too. uh, no matter how it is not very understood in places , they are rejected, but on the issue of information , we need what we need, there we need our own corporate points, we need our own correspondents. we need our information from there, as they need from here, because we read about them in the western media and they read about us in the same western world. and this is through the western ones. so to say damaged phones. yes, it distorts, the picture is distorted, it is clear that the situation there in this country of nigeria is, as it were, but not very simple. well, nevertheless. yes, it seems to me

that this also poses a rather interesting problem. the first, the second also responding, as if to what was said, of course , we have spoken about this many times, we are here at these sites. yes , and it seems to me that this is obvious until we let's not create problems. uh, to the west collective in particular to the americans. where they are. indeed, it is, uh, uncomfortable and painful until we win in this situation, because again , no matter how cruel or cynical it may sound, but, unfortunately, even the bloodiest battles in eastern ukraine seem to they don’t care at all, there russian ukrainians can kill each other for as long as they want, i don’t give a damn about artyomovsky, so to speak, to lugansk, and they don’t care about all these names at all. it's them over there it's theirs satisfied, because it is important for our fighters to show heroism there. indeed, as it were, a violent clash is taking place, but nevertheless from a geopolitical point of view. it doesn't solve the problem. again, no offense. well, in my opinion. it is so there until we create. to people, as it were, i mean,

americans, we are, so to speak, this very ally of the problem, where it really hurts them. they can still supply there for a very long time, weapons, iron, money, they have enough , they will still print, and so on and so forth. for example, let's say the russian-chinese exercises of the navy near alaska. it would seem so to say, yes, a harmless thing. why did it happen? yes? suddenly , it made them move , american newspapers are already writing about it. they sent there , two of these same warships moving , remembered that alaska is four kilometers away from the russian federation, that if you look at the globe from the other side, then america and russia have a common border. it's a pity that alaska is not ours. by the way, to the question. yes, those people who it was once said that territory does not solve anything. imagine alaska would be ours , in general, i just radically absolutely some kind of the most geopolitical situation. and so. well, it is far from interesting to develop, as it were, and so on, but, nevertheless, they began to stir. although it would seem, so to speak , absolutely any doctrine. so to speak, rescue operations are being worked out, drowning in places, yes. and suddenly such

a reaction is inadequacy, why would it be? why would that be? and this applies to many other things where they really can be scared or uncomfortable or they can't understand there to create problems for them there to create problems for them. even the recent visit of the minister of defense to north korea is clear that how he would agree on defense issues, but, nevertheless, even the very fact that we are getting closer to north korea, by the way, is also an injection. at this very point, so to speak , they actually, it is unpleasant, of course, as if it is not known how it will develop. let's lift all north korean sanctions i personally think it's high time did. it is high time to do this and to designate, for example, strategic security guarantees for north korea or another iran for iran for other countries to raise physical security guarantees. yes , let's talk about these things, because we really have opposing reasons , we have, so to speak, the information field is filled with pictures of military operations. well, in fact, once again i tell you, sort of, yes. eh, well again it's an obvious thing. well, let's just say

some exercises in alaska. or, for example, some tests of our weapons. it doesn't much worse than everything that happens on the line of contact. although we can talk about it, so to speak, there for hours and it seems like they are doing it right, right? therefore, they have spoken about it many times, they will say it again. now, about the civilizational confrontation. and i personally, to be honest, i’m very satisfied, but i’m conscious of this matter, that a few years ago it became here at political discussions, including at your site, vladimir yes, introduce the word satanism, yes, because indeed it has become now, so, uh, almost sergey naryshkin mentions it in his article in a common place, yes, and, in my opinion, he also mentioned this to the president. i believe that this is correct. i still, for example, let's say about five or seven years, there and back, as if it was read as strange in general to speak strangely, in general to talk about politics with religious undertones. yes, they say, like, well, it's there, that's the priests and that's it. it's all there, it 's all kinds of money for a fanatic in headscarves or some kind of subcultural things, you know, but i think that the need to penetrate the essence of things. she

is extremely important, including for thinking men, yes, for whom it is necessary to say so after all. you understand what the meaning is, where the turnover is important. how you accept or not accept is another question. yes? well, at least think. this topic is important. so, in my opinion. indeed, in fact modern western civilization is a civilization moving satanism, that is, absolutely consciously worshiping evil. uh, one after the other in succession, so to speak, yes, the legalization of all those sins that are outlined in almost all world religions, it is absolutely unacceptable to raise them to the rank of a cult to the rank of a rule and, moreover, the adoption of laws that force you to do this. not easy. uh, reject sin. they force you to support him to encourage such things. for a long time i must say the planet has not seen. this is such a really serious situation, so to speak, which really shows that the west has embarked on a very, very gloomy civilizational path. but the interpretation of westerners about

the civilizational clash with russia as uh, allegedly invented far-fetched russia with this. i disagree. yes, here we know, so to speak, the text came out. yes, so to speak, i wrote it for tomorrow, it doesn’t matter in which, uh, that’s all the same, so to speak. yes, we mm. west we are following the bright path of progress. but russia it means that it decided that the west means satanism and fell into some kind of extreme conservatism and so on. yes. uh, russia well at least for 20 years she has been trying to integrate herself into this global game and the leadership of the west, in principle, has been recognized. i personally. i would never agree with this. but this is true, that is , russia has been looking for these combination options for quite a long time. yes, as it were, but how can you save yourself at least partially yes, still combine e your way. uh, a huge number of formats of opportunities were searched for by the western way,

so on the economic and political plane, i am absolutely sure that the post-soviet elite. she is generally absolutely pro-western where there uh, intuitively somewhere consciously, well, in different ways, but it is absolutely pro-western internal and for a long time it has been looking for opportunities to build itself into this world elite on more or less equal rights. i believe that it was doomed, as it were, yes in advance, but nonetheless. this is so, therefore, all this talk about what, like , russia, so to speak, gone crazy or there, so to speak, putin went crazy, and all these people, who suddenly invented a satanic west for themselves. and so they decided to confront him, because they are like this to themselves, so this is to themselves. uh, it means they really put putin at some point, uh, consciously. it seems to me that he began to restore some, at least partially, the basis of traditional russian statehood, but, nevertheless. this search for a combination of the west well, it just continued until the very last moment , the west itself continued systematically. all these 30

years, right up to the last most, until today, led the matter to what we began to realize. and i believe it let even this in difficult conditions, but it is right that they began to realize their civilizational incompatibility with the west. that's what's been going on for a long time. we told ourselves that we are not just compatible. we are exactly the same as they are, by the way, what people continue to tell themselves. the soviet states in the ukraine there and in some others here are the ukrainians, they say we are europeans. the most important tragedy is that they are not europeans sooner or later, they will understand this and being in europe themselves as non-europeans. this torment to change breaks you, as it were, yes, in terms of the way they think and the way they perceive the world , they are completely never europeans, but that’s not the point, but the point is that we, as it were, have come. we are slowly coming to this realization, and then there are parts of uh hmm sanych that we are really civilizational with them. well, either poorly compatible or incompatible at all, although i do not deny, so to speak, the possibility of the need to maintain some kind of relationship would be stupid, yes, to talk about one hundred percent

insulation. it's impossible, it's impossible and stupid nonetheless. you know, here the situation is not easy to hell. we didn't follow the contour. it's not that we didn't pass the competition, you understand, right? we were not brought there, no exception, they went there we were not accepted there, so to speak, e this very thing was not accepted by the tristrats. you know we will not come on the fifth column. yes, yes, here i must say they don’t accept this for this thing, so these many of these things have become aggravated. that is, i once again why we tried to live in illusions. we tried to live some kind of dream, so to speak. yes, now, as it were , this awakening let the heavy one make you realize things as they are. shakespeare is sad to understand and school. yes, so, here, and i think that we learned by heart in english, but there was such a thing. i think that this is what we are with one. this is

not bad and this is painfully enough. the question here remains the question for me. does the west really so radically fail to understand what it has done and radically fails to understand what has happened to russia happens or he probably only pretends, because in their texts on russia to be honest, i do not see any novelty. that is, it seems to be like yes, so to speak, you know how. what did your rifled work look like? this is when the dissertation, right? in what scientific i do not know, here is not present. there is no novelty is there either on my approach or lack of novelty, right? either a standard propaganda cliché or some kind of internal absolutely unwillingness to understand, all the same counterparts they have, so to speak. yes, all the same names with which i communicate, a little the same interviewers who say the same thing, that is, the unwillingness to understand these things. it seems to me, partly because they themselves are inside the illusion. yes, they are about themselves. this is called in the orthodox opinion about oneself, as it were, yes, delusion about oneself, and one of them is one of the tasks that we are facing in this case.

and this is still actualization, that is, roughly speaking in russian, the search for those people in the west who , in fact, the west itself does not accept such people quite a lot, quite a lot, and there is something to talk about with them. in vain we are from this refusals, but they refused my others, among other things, because for a very long time ten-year-olds themselves were looking for these, yes, possible, uh, connection, these connections. unfortunately, it turned out to be impossible, it is also interesting that with whom all these people spoke. so, the new yorkers are talking to those fighters with russia who confidently fought on our side with our own money. that is, we ourselves brought up a whole plaid of professional traitors. well, this is my personal opinion, something like an enterprise of the same venediktov who was called to every office, which every time any whim that now says through his lips that he understands putin perfectly, but the truth is that putin has taken steps that he does not understand. but we ourselves brought up a galaxy

of traitors. and they did not draw any conclusions in particular about them. well, in my opinion. in general, i heard that the russian nation, uh, has a reputation for being an ambitious nation, and even for a few hours. which is not very good, of course, but i can agree to eat this moment, right? uh, well, why am i saying this? well, in general, as a 100% russian. although i say so, of course, i perceive with great regret the death of our guys, and so to speak, and all the horrors that the war brings. but this, as they say, is an inevitable situation. but the fact is that today russia has become the number one figure in the world. well, in general

, there is some kind of drive in this, to put it bluntly , in the words of foreign aggressors. in general, this is the place that our place first look russia today is simple. at the very center of world politics, russia is changing the world and rightly so. this is worthy. this once again says that you know, we often it happens. this is a somewhat depressing topic. we don't have enough population. well, yes, a larger population would be better, but i must say, in general, all the great things in history were done with a small number of people, a small one at all, by the way, moscow generally created this great country with a meager amount of people in general, and they were others.

so that's what it's called. now it's so different pasenonarnosti. this is what does, in general , do great things in the world. therefore, i repeat, of course, it would be nice to have more people. well, so to speak, it is not necessary. not one must think that if so, then we lost everything. no, listen to how much it was. like the ancient greeks or the macedonian soldiers , how many thousand 10 at most? how many mongols were there? this is where all the tales there are hundreds of thousands, what hundreds of thousands there were 10-15 thousand horses. and what did they do, generally organized boarding houses. so this too. in general, this is in general, it must be said or flattered.

especially after what we went through in the nineties, when it was a complete time of humiliation in general and as they say, well today uh hmm today it's a different state, as for it, it is a civilizational conflict, which is ten years old. so it has been going on for 200-300 years, since peter broke through this window in europe. so it began, that he was not there, that it was there from time to time a little, something calmed down a little. a. well, in principle, this conflict was, and mind you. western political scientists for some reason do not ask the question. and why russia didn’t have a civilizational conflict about china in general , there were contradictions, well, there was no civilizational conflict with india there with the same africa, i don’t know, that is with other civilizations. somehow somehow somehow got around it. why exactly the west, probably, in this case, is that the ginger

of a wonderful story is an english philosopher, just one of those whom sergei says that there are people there unconditionally and smart of this, he directly said the west is aggressive. this is the essence of the west, as far as i would like a remark about mr. fukuyama's next export. just really stupid. well, it’s worse in general, maybe a person who claims to be some kind of science can say that liberal democracy is some kind of vertex. so to speak, firstly, liberal democracy in itself. this is not the structure of society. there was capitalism was velichskoy society. there is feudalism. at the same time , there may be democracy in ancient rome, as you know there was democracy in greece there was democracy. it doesn't and at the same time. uh,

the nazis of hitler's germany was a dictatorship. although it was a capitalist society. at the same time, that is, this is absolutely not connected in any way , how can it be said? this is a person who generally stands on some kind of there , i don’t know, so to speak, understanding modernity and the second. here is the thesis , too, it is lethal, of course, the proof is that many people in the world tend to migrate to the united states, but not in china , listen to this. well, firstly, china you don't migrate very much, by the way, in china, by the way, many people would like to leave. well, china doesn't let anyone in, so to speak. this is known in the second place, well, everything is explained very simply, people go. uh, these poor people from africa from latin america are not going to the united states for liberal democracy. and because, well, there, indeed, there is a higher salary level there. it is a rich country, but a rich country , thanks to which it was primarily due to

the fact that the printing press was due to this. yes, they support, the second party in the world in terms of the number of visitors is russia. but this goes without saying. well, i mean, let's say his argument. until now, with regard to the united states , they will not deny that the united states really has a huge market, a rich country. indeed, so to speak, especially for a man who has nothing at all. there is an opportunity, at least not to die of hunger. it's a fact, it's a fact. we were in america , we don’t need it, well, understandable. how is it determined. today. today. this is determined before the printing press due to this. so to speak , a certain level is maintained. ah, the standard of living. this is what they are fighting for. by the way, that's why this is another stupid thing that fukuyama. ah, as they say with the trail of the prophets informed all mankind.

now sergey also spoke about this. well let me agree with that you know the difference between us they have a plan and we don't. here they have a plan. defeat russia. they're thinking about it, sitting there. it's just stupid there are some offices they sit. let's discuss and discuss. and let's do it in such a way as to defeat. i mean , they do it. they have a purpose. we have no such goal can be traced. well, if we are trying to drive this away, we are all the time therefore we are always number two, and

we had this tradition, by the way, in russian empire.