on the land of kharkiv, the correct decision is nothing. fire control. you look at them, immediately tie up a serious problem, there is no work. well, how did you hide here? what do you have here tomato? well done neighbors, who our neighbors are all mine, it turns out you have four sides, yes, you can already see the kupyanov. they are now seriously preparing their character there, yes , they folded in a tank battalion and participated in a tank.

the fact is that the united states is really fighting for hegemony. they are now the hegemon they are, no one has yet displaced them. here we can only together with china why one at a time, because one at a time we are not yet the integrated power of the united states, we do not yet correspond. but together with china , we will now challenge them. and that means economic military all in one glass. that's while the americans are losing it. they will fight there was a period when russia could challenge the complex power. well, how so? red second economy? she is the soviet union. yeah, let me remind you that up to this point there was mahogany. deprived of everything surrounded from everywhere, which, despite this, threw, a challenge to the whole world and they didn’t care about

the complex power or not, because there was an idea that absorbed everything, and when we start playing at their indicators, well, rather for your likes. we cannot challenge. let's lie down now, let's die against us. the 50 largest economies in the world have united and are fighting. and we hit the tinsel, based on our employees. just hegem now for now that's why the united states is they occupy everything they dollar dominates at least for now. what dollars where do we get at home and how can we come up with something for ourselves hegemoths on the front line, where the hegemot, here goes to the patriot park plumber of this hegemon, exhibited. no, money, moon can't do a damn thing. oh, the hegemons at home, it happens that the hegemon us, when they ask , do you want the biden to come to power again or move to russia, they say, they will go to russia on the streets. there it is only worth

leaving, but i am not the only thing we are doing in this western idolatry. we drill fighting for what a lot of polars. that's what we 're talking about, why no united states a what kind of world do we have? that's the right question, do not say. in general, the theory itself is a lot of polar world. what is it about? is it about the fact that there will be several centers in the world at once? the ideas put forward by the chinese of the 10s, why we first means the nineties and 2000 we were running after the ideas of the americans, now we are going to run for the ideas. no, we're trying , we just accepted this idea. in the ninety-sixth year, who, as reasonable primakov in particular , was amazing with this, but that was in the ninety- sixth year. it was completely different. russia was in a completely different position. and he reasoned

in terms that were accepted then, but they don't work at all now. what multipolarity. and what kind of criterion of polarity is some world, what kind of mechanistic definition is it, maybe there are useless ones? the world about which they say, for example, putin - this is a world of different civilizations. yes, for god's sake, it's still a plural world. it means that the polar different things are absolutely different things in a lot of the polar world. and i do not want to be attracted to any policy. i generally in half some he bullet his america respect for the chinese, but you are their civilization is not mine, i will never be part of chinese civilization, although i have a great attitude towards their cultural heritage, but i do not want to argue now on the methodology. it's just there, if we play these games, then it turns out that russia is not there again, that is, first , well, like first, we were such a fit that kept trying to jump into the ass of the west. and now we will be such a criminal.

to the east or what? is it possible to proceed from some kind of constant and from a lot of civilizational approach is the same. who he is, by the way, is present from the russian lexicon and cannot be present. yes, someone is present, of course, you may be present oh yes. no, we are somehow more like kondratiev gumilyov like this, if from russian operations, and so the whole theory of international relations, she, like marxism, came for the west we are married to her. we had a marxist theory, which, on which our school was built. let's be corrections so crushed into marxism. it has been changed so much that classical marxism has remained slightly in the economy. everything else could be, i don’t know how it is in the economy. i know, because the institute, uh, world conjuncture and world

politics. remember this was, uh evgeny smylovich. yes, the academy, here he headed it in the forty-seventh year. this institution was dissolved and everything with the world revolutions is there with the world ones. for what? because there western gradations were realist, even they were marxists. therefore, i will say from this i knew that western gradations talk about him in categories. you more do you like to spend your vacation in western siberia or eastern siberia, yes, yes? just try anyway. well, how did you talk about what you were talking about yesterday, yes, when, or a photo yesterday, when mikhail khatin, very correctly said that we are really constantly being controlled by the thought of western terminology. well, you also bring civilization from there, no, somehow a civilizational theory, too. if there on the fact that

there are several civilizations in the world. naturally, these civilizations are very blurred correctly by russians. here is the rudder of the peoples who need to be civilized, so i will not reduce civilization. i can state, and the state is also something of an african state. this is what you get all the time. yes hard divided into tribes. yes, and if there are no states there, which, in our historical understanding, are states that are associated with a certain territory of linguistic culture and these are the rings of civilization signs. and how does ivan the terrible come out and say, i am the tsar, civilized russia or what? no, i am the orthodox church. that's all i am. here

we are defined correctly. and the fourth is not sometimes moscow is the third rome, the fourth does not happen, and you all try to drown it with the second washington after taking the strip, because judging by the fact that we are standing here, not everything was flooded. gotta be careful. i will say the same, and who did not drown us. now we will look in the history of mankind, and we will have problems with this in different ways. i don't remember him stoking. well, well, well, so where do you remember? this is not your story, you were not drowned. i believe that our civilization. this is in general, the concept of civilization is always understood very rather complicated, because our civilization needs to be formed here. every fourth person in our country is a muslim. yes, what kind of civilization does he refer to in this case, but statehood, we have now

lost a lot, and therefore building the state on the basis, i did not understand. what does it mean that muslims are not civilized? no, they are realized, they are orthodox. if we talk about that, again, according to the gradation that we have, that we have a glorious civilization. and who said that we have an orthodox says, that anyone ever distribute? right now, this run about civilization was. about what? here and now you will tell me just what i proceed from the fact that russia is a great orthodox country. yes, of course, russia is a great muslim. yes, the country is the state and for many centuries the state. yes, but for some reason you cite the civilization of the category of religiosity, and to which i proceed from

the statehood of statehood, then we return no, again you took it up, no, firstly, the state does not lead to polarity, but word at all. therefore, then you will define such a civilization. well, sorry, that's what you're suggesting. why should i define i propose, i'm sorry i why should i why should i propose the terms that you use i are not used, of course, by civilizations, because you use the terron, which came over from latin. i used, which had a completely different meaning in general , you invite them to describe a phenomenon that is now much higher than what the ancient democracies invested, so i say, the position of religiosity sips, yes statehood and running away from this polarity, using, using the same terminology of the state, the terminology concerns. here's the thing about that set

about the polarity set. that does not apply, even close to statehood. no, of course, what is the relationship to the state, because each speaks of the internal structure of polarity - these are categories of external correlation. strongly at the same time, absolutely subjective polarity can exist in a world in which there are no states, it’s somewhere, please, here you will have warring tribes, and in theory, you will have warring tribes , say, a lot of polar japan where the principality will be at war with the principalities within one formal state. you will have polarity. it will not be a state, because within one japanese state. you will have chopped up a wild number of different warring states anyway, of course, because they have one state of japan that has been fastened to one emperor so far. by the way, of course, we started, and then you will have a large number of belligerents. well, like in china seven kingdoms yes, warring kingdoms in japan

, you have one emperor. i don't want to talk about this though. we don’t confuse marxists with these westerners of yours, well, it’s understandable, it’s understandable in the struggle of the working class with the world ka marxist, only the one who is determined by one alone. well, hardly anyone proletarian well, no, here finishing i can say one thing, that yes, no, it was preserved. here is the problem. the main thing we have now that is getting up, if you want to enslave, educate. this is what we are facing. the enslavement of the people begins with substitution of the terminology of concepts, when you

educate the elite by its nature, speaking in a foreign language with foreign political terms, growth, whose success is measured by a foreign science of metrics. with a foreign system of grants, with someone else's recognition in order to seize the country from the inside in order for certain circumstances to arise, not a will, it does not arise today for tomorrow. it sometimes arises in one night, not often, stalin is a hero, we quote the classic who said, yes, that the revolution is in the first place queue, 10,000 vacancies. napoleon says so, so here, in fact, sometimes a change occurs overnight, a change of power can occur overnight, but changes in the concepts of the conceptual series will continue for quite a long time, and before and after soon the bolsheviks changed the concept, and due to

this behavior, they changed how they they changed their language, they changed their concepts. that is why they took the place that they had had the impudence of the move, they are eternal desires. look at how they will perceive it in the west. no, of course, yes, not at all, of course, yes, power polarity of aging conditions. the impudence of the course was impudence thin, and if it were not, we would not say anything anywhere. you have no idea about the future of the world. we heard. i said multipolar world, but that's nonsense. so this is an interesting feeling, because you do not define the concept of multipolarity. you define other hosts. why other hosts? well, there used to be an american master, now there will be chinese mistresses of the chinese economy. russia lacks some kind of combined power. russia has heard its history

and acts together. russia can't deal with china perform together. with whom, together with china, russia cannot act together with whom in russia it always acts , proceeding from its national interests, with all the deepest respect for china, for its culture, for its tradition , for its history, russia is not a burdock that clings to the large world running through, like people said civilization. they can act as allies. here they come again, how can they be allies if you have one and a half billion here 150 million. but we will have a head you see it more. this means that you are again putting russia in a deliberately pejorative position in the military sphere, please. well, yes, they got so twisted that i don’t really know where to twist yours out of here.

well, in principle, i agree with you , that's why i say that yes , this thesis of multipolarity of some kind causes me, well , as you say, it is a good thesis. well, kind of inadequate. by the way, incidentally, i would point out that simple and sovereignty is not enough thesis for the attractiveness of the general world. and i will explain it is very simple that the fact is that for many countries sovereignty is not a value for the majority. it is a value for us, because we are incredibly rich, because we have a huge territory and we really want to be sovereign, but strictly speaking, if we look at small countries. their main idea is not sovereignty, it is to find such an owner who will somehow support them, but we see it, here, but to find porous, well, attraction, as it

was in europe, so to speak, came there through the ussr, which the difference between romanian and bulgarian, and they don’t have ukrainians either. they don't have. come on, they don't have any. do they have only one idea, what to come there? they will be given money, this is sovereignty and multipolarity - this is, uh, a concept that they are important concepts, but they are attractive to large nations for large countries, and today there are almost four such countries, small autumn, but small, but strong, well, strong. yes, you are right, strong, but i mean , in the aggregate of their national forces , ambitions and capabilities, these are the united states of russia china india well, who something else? yes, no more, in fact , today's america brazil but we see it, where they have weapons, you understand that brazil's

people have at least one warhead. no , that's right, why latin america? it is quite possible that someone will arrive in time to enter this day, brazil cannot claim and i think it needs it internally. if she needs sovereignty, then the limited brazil program to create i guarantee to say that i have finished, perhaps i say some debatable things, for sure. i'm not sure about them, and there, if i'm sure, maybe they mistakenly, well, then you bomb them in a bad way. uh, in this sense, you are talking about something, and what were the zhiviks taking. they had a different idea, their idea was a little polarity, and not even sovereignty, they had justice, they offered to create a new just world and

offered this particular model to the whole world. and it worked while the bolsheviks were there, of course, we don’t like gumilyov already, i see, many science denies science in general. well listen to this great invention. this is the discovery of a boarding house. it's a fact the one who lived there for 70 years, like me you know they are professional. i saw them and the only thing he couldn't explain. where does it come from? well listen, newton's isaac opened up. he still doesn't know why he works. so this, most importantly, the bolsheviks discovered, so they , as you rightly say, the country was in absolute, the situation was absolutely asia

, as if nikita had no one there was one smell that drove soviet russia penovaya found on the border. with poland in the same place there was a constant border war - this is all this and nevertheless. they managed to create such a powerful idea that captured the whole world and they had a lot of allies all over the world. the comintern of this communist party. well, what does he say, in the forty -sixth year, the french communist party won the elections in greece, the communists won in italy , the communists won after the war. it was , in general, a moment when, in fact, if the americans had not used their own there, adrianovich laughs outright, so to speak. so it's not. andrew no, of course not. well it's so andrew lord denial of the state crushed the greeks with the help of the wehrmacht, who was

captured. it got to the point that they used captured germans to suppress the greeks who fought after. why because the greeks were greek communists this, well, this is to say, this, so why am i talking, because it’s still not enough. here is this moment. here is this offer from the fair world. i, in my own way, like you and i are marxists, and so to speak. well, i’m absolutely convinced that the future of the world is socialist and what other world cannot be, and the point is not that say. we like socialism immediately remembers. there is this soviet union of the sixty-eighth or there of the seventy-third year and there will be no such model of the soviet union, this is one of the models of socialism that was needed at that moment, and then it worked, but then it stopped working, but i simply proceed from the fact that

this the world has become too complex, it is too crowded, there are no resources in it. and this means that the role of society will be stronger and stronger, and this is socialism, what is the difference between capitalism, if in two in words and socialism, this is individually this social, probably, some kind of concept will be found, but still the world is moving towards this. it is inevitable, as i see it and we see it even, because in america it takes place in this citadel of capitalism. look actually. they use more and more socialist some of these, then biden give money to students there, how much are they promising billions of dollars on the sidelines? what is it, what is capitalism? no, it’s me, too, a sign , so to speak, that is, it’s all blurred, it ’s already impossible to lead this world, since led. incidentally, i do not deny that outstanding achievements would have been attempted.

there is, yes, this is a system that worked worked, and so to speak about the part is still working, but i mean that in my opinion. she walks into the sunset and it is no coincidence that a chinese model, a vietnamese model, appears. this is not by chance. i mean we need to. it seems to me that there is still something to offer the world in this direction, because this idea is still in demand and it is much more so . for the most part. i repeat. i do not deny there multipolar sovereignty, but i say that for many countries - this is secondary sovereignty for a small country. well, what about sovereignty? why is sovereignty for slovenia that's what it gives for the slavs, how will they live? yes, there is no way to say so, so they still do it, but the world is a fair world, in which some rules will still be found that will make this world more

fair. now people's problems are common problems. it seems to me that this is important, therefore , in this sense, i kind of think that this one this topic is missing in our ideology today, it is not enough for internal, by the way, use, but because we are constantly folding the terminology is alien. children, they say, but everything is an option. no, there is a set and that's it. this was done in the fact that justice is in god. but the rest is not lined up. fairly it is let's do it without blasphemy. it will be easier for everyone. you have already agreed enough today about the muslim civilization i'm talking about exactly what you're talking about that, in principle, it's justice for us in general. this is something that is close to the russian federation in general in general and in this sense it is just.

ours is more national, and we are all the time because we take all the time and the last 30 years. we still appeal to western, so to speak, western ideas, and we still repeat it. we must completely agree with this break. this is what needs to be done for the second time. i think that the important ideas that are again somehow spinning around here, eurasianism, eurasianism, the most important ideas i need here again, i understand that we have such a negative gumilyov. well, first of all, it started. there is no nineteenth century and the theory itself , in my opinion, it is very correct for our civilization, to a certain extent, the soviet civilization was eurasian, and in this sense, eurasianism. it is as if that she gives this question of orthodox muslims does not veil. you can be orthodox can be a muslim jew. to buddhists by anyone, maybe you are

a eurasian. you belong to this vast space called eurasia, and it seems to me that this ideological moment of mine should be much more. it is more definite, because with us, as it were , due to our development of the last thirty years, this is how to say it. this is our bourgeois culture, as it were, it denies it. she seems to be, it seems to be this. but it seems that we don’t need this. we are talking about something else in fact. it seems to me that this is the key to our development and our movement forward.

as a very young man, he joined the ukrainian galician army. there, they

were trained as scouts for saboteurs. and, of course, monsters, the holocaust in lviv was organized by the ukrainians, 6,000 were destroyed bandera man. western intelligence services kept used in anti-soviet activities.

civilizational issues of some kind will be transferred to such more mundane ones, in particular, the army forum, which i try to get into every year. he literally came to the studio from there and today, in my opinion , there was some interesting fact when dmitry anatolyevich medvedev recorded a video from a patriot. and not just against the background of our technology. yes, against the background of trophy equipment, i want to tell you that this is one of the most now on the forum on the most interesting points of attraction of public attention there, you just won’t get there and there is just a struggle to get in to look at those brought from ukraine. it’s really

interesting to see the technological level of what they do there, because well, it’s a sin to hide. previously, we didn’t have such an opportunity was, and so hmm thanks. with all these supplies, our army, our pc got the opportunity. it's not just about looking at papers. and to feel something for yourself , to find out something, on the contrary, to correct, for example, one of the military men who was there he said that these well-known american howitzers m3 sevens that is, they have a declared range of a child of 40 km, in fact it turns out that it is less, that is, the shooting showed that they shoot it not as far as they say. and in general, the discovery is very much and most importantly. in my opinion. today, we already had a small segment at the beginning, and during which a representative of the state, talked about russia's cooperation with china with iran, too.