americans dollars let's get a little. i don’t often torment people with military mathematics, but it makes sense to tell a little what 200 billion dollars million dollars is, i’ll explain, then, uh. well, for example, means, uh , only one, only one . that is, respectively, even if just two. eh, he lets two packets a day go to the whole front, then in order to just get these hummers for a month , you need a little bit of a hub of 15 million. let me remind you, 200 give one velin costs 175.000 dollars. if even just 10 pieces he thinks that they don’t spend a day, then , uh, accordingly, only 52 million are needed per month on javelins. why did i bring these two systems, because it’s impossible to save on them, because of course, one

one of the tricky nuances of the american military mathematics of military assistance is that the money that they allocate to ukraine for weapons does not get to ukraine itself for a short time, that is , not the center at all, because weapons are taken either from warehouses, which is most often, which is still there 20- 30 years was paid and the money has already been spent. and what is called it costs completely different money. and under this topic, who has it in these warehouses or the companies that produce it are simply transferred for the production of a new one , it is believed that it was spent on ukraine but on new weapons. you will not save hammers and gorelins, what is called from under the knife there are no stocks of them. they produce everything, it either goes directly to replenish american stocks, the fish goes directly to ukraine. therefore , these 200 million. i will not list further what they also promised them p3 there, here is one shot , one rocket 4 million, and there, and various anti-tank systems. that is, it turns out that these 200 million will be enough at best.

well, if you try so hard to stretch it out, then for about 2 weeks this is what such huge american assistance is, in general, it is very interesting that i sat down and calculated this morning on purpose. how much does it cost. uh, the united states is a separate nato war, if you take the support of ukraine in the first place, it goes on display, if back in july last year. uh, monthly support, uh, nato and the united states combined was 800 million dollars a month, then , for example, in june this june, 6 billion were spent. in general, if you just take it officially, how much they supplied, then the united states overate that 45 billion spent on britain's military support is 6 billion and the european union's 20 billion , it turns out that a month of war. if we take again on average, although this is wrong, because i repeat the costs are exponential a year ago ukraine had a bunch of its post-soviet weapons with which it

could fight, and now it fights only with those what they give to the average 4 billion. a war costs them a month. and, of course, one must understand that such expenses are generally not very large, at least for europeans, let's say e pleasure. and most importantly, everything is great. you understand that the prospects are only for the fact that these costs will grow in russia, therefore, uh , a statement that we will prepare another offensive for next spring. in this case, it starts. as they said in one movie, ringing a calculator, because everyone starts to read. and how much are they all the case should be spent here. science will spend ukraine's life on this and how many ukrainians will have to die before the next offensive about this, the most interesting thing that no one thinks. we know very well that one of the most secret figures in ukraine so far is the figure of total losses, and it is quite clear that this is, as it were, a trauma for society. but the most important thing, to

repeat. this e figure is closed, related to the fact that the e resource is not infinite. and if he is fighting now, well, in total , he is more precisely in the armed forces and power structures of about 750-800.000 ukrainians. and if you understand that already at least 200,000, and according to other sources, 280 died, then the ratio of the living and the dead is such that, in general, it takes aback and, of course, in this case, when yesterday, uh, our defense minister said that the resources of ukraine ends a lot of people began to argue with him, because of course. daviks understand that they are telling you that resources are running out, and they are attacking you. there, 6-7 times a day, then in general, it is difficult to understand this here is the very case, when there is the concept of trench. the truth is the truth soldiers who fights off every day. and there is the truth, relatively speaking, the generals of the general staff, who understands, uh, time lags.

and this is true , it is of a slightly different quality, because the truth of the general staff lies in the fact that in october, realizing that it is urgent to change the situation, urgently carry out military reform, because it made such decisions the results that we have seen now , so summer it seemed that all those decisions that were, starting from mobilization, starting from deployment. more precisely, the strengthening of the deployment of the military industry begins the formation of new formations, starting again from the line of severoviki to the formation of strategic defense transitions, that all these decisions of the modern lag in half a year turned out to be absolutely. and this, of course, suggests that this is, as it were, a real ability to wage war. you understand that such a traditional ukrainian rat race has begun, who is to blame, that is, these topics

are to blame for the military leadership or the political. how to present yourself at a wedding here, without you, we had such a conversation that, well, this bitch of a wedding has gone, that is , they are trying to offer themselves the head of ukraine for the helm, and not only poroshenko is already participating in this race, but razumkov was also offered. that is, they began to look around like that, because it is clear that this one is already somehow not channeling this, it must be written off. well, listen, there really were a lot of such questions . and this is really not a figure of speech, and so vladimir vladimirovich said a good phrase synchronization is on the one hand there is no political process. and as you know, the earthquake is also a victim, but on the other hand, it really is a search. that's what the problem is not solved. how they wanted on a macro level, right? the problem arises with the people who actually made the political decision, you know? we will not forget this phrase. well, he will be an example

of yatsenyuk, uh, the head of kiev will be klitschko , no one has canceled this, but nonetheless. here comes the military. if it is possible, so conditionally say, when there is such disagreement about who can be, well if not morally in authority with a person who can, on whom one can entrust and some kill for supper. e. well, actually, you understand, they shouted so much that here we recaptured the hariks of the genius of the zaluzhny. and now, when we are so quiet, carefully, yes , we take it away, then it’s hard to tin, it killed the cheese. you know, i want to say, if that's what i'm seeing from ukrainian sources. yes, about ukrainian sources, what i look at, while they have authority, and that is quite serious authority, for now. i think the inner agenda. i have already said, here is also a paradoxical thing, that zelensky is still in authority - this issue is not discussed, but i also told you that there are a lot of

people. you say he is an authority, but simply shows that more than 70 percent of ukrainians are directly blamed by the president for such a level of corruption, there and in everything else, well, on the other hand, if we take zelensky as the leader of the nation, so far this is also considered by the vast majority. i'm a zhiguli race leader of the nations of the normal you know, there is a feeling, i'll give an example. by the way, you you know very well, yes, vladimir vladimirovich , there is no history either. look, for example, in france they think that things are going in the wrong direction. he, let's say the french, well, eighty-one percent, you know, that is the principle, they believe that inflation itself is a problem. eh, as if they are in the first place in society. and the fact that it goes in the wrong direction is developing. that's how i actually remembered even before military ukraine that at that time you knew, that is, yes, you thought that they were developing not in the right direction, well, political leaders. they had some some weight, but not always. it was a converted option. i've

said this 100 times already. you may have a great personal rating, you may have a level of trust, but when it comes to the political process, this does not work here. and now about those players who may be involved. i will repeat my thought again. there are people, here, who, here, vasily dmitrievich does not pronounce his last name, who really hate zelensky now, there are a lot of such people. they are still sitting in ambush. we underestimate this resource, because as soon as something breaks. here there such conditions will be there , only a small one, well, the tripping of a person who has stumbled will be finished off. and that's when we'll probably see that events can really develop very quickly palace upheavals. i think, i think that here is the result of the counter-us will be exactly a palace coup. at the same time, a person is transmitting who will tell me, well, listen, well, in the past it was somehow possible no, well, listen. how was it possible to bury so many guys who would kick me? well, listen. well, well, that he is this forest counter nastov, how can you steal like that?

tell me about what sign, look at the good guy of minds. the first sign is that i am renaming yermak street klitschko. well, yes, it was like that, you know, you remembered poroshenko and a number of other defendants for a reason. the same klitschko, by the way, also remembers in vain how people can play in some cases. uh, well, some role of political processes, perhaps, well, you know, there is one nuance that so far does not solve the problem. here, our comrade ramzaev correctly said one thing, that today, today, if not none of the military tasks will be solved. this is where the political consequences will come, because these are the four weeks that you have outlined. here i can say for sure that there will be a field for my maneuver. so that i can somehow talk and the russians will take some things, kupyansk and go out to kharkov. it will be terrible for hysterics, but i’ll tell you more, what it’s like, you know, my inner insight, i’ll also tell you this be careful on the air like this. well, here are some

indirect signs. there are a large number people in ukraine, including those in exile. i mean, not here in russia, but in europe , which, in principle, thinks differently about the process, here are the possible agreements of possible negotiations and so many. that is, it’s not customary to say it now, not here, not in ukraine, but by and large you know this , it’s that it’s such an incognito, well , there are more of these people than you think, what they show in questions. eh, do you understand ukrainian correctly? what, for example, is a failure in the kharkov region. maybe emotionally. swing very strongly, and everything emotional will shake emotionally, of course, the population is preparing when they say, of course, we must prepare for the lubyanka, maybe 7 km. there it is, well, this is our dear experts , what the guys understand is that they are going to head on, what is needed, most likely, just as they say kharkov, it is clear that the russians will most likely arrange it. there is a blockade, kharkiv well, here the question is, and in the zaporozhye direction there is no less significant position, because there is access to the sea of ​​azov. this is the one

a task which, in any case, is publicly indicated. here in these you understand that i am not saying this again. here is what our guys say, yes, if this topic does not work for them, explain, you know what they didn’t say now, what happened, let’s say in the spring that we are there at the end of may, we will drink coffee somewhere on the yalta embankment. well, in june we will do something there. even in some city there or mariupol they broadcast there. now this is completely gone from the word, and i understand that this is really what it is, i don’t know how they will figure it out, but in in any case, such, of course, statements no longer exist and anxiety has appeared and anxiety is starting to come out of the factory to blame. ah, in the process to replace zelensky yes, blame the west for not giving you enough weapons , the boy will tell you, but now it’s not working, it’s already working, of course, just a minute. so you don't know how to fight. you are still full of this topic , of course, that ukrainians do not know how to fight. naruto should be told that it was my military command's fault to turn to them and say

wait a minute. you were riding. you shouted that the pianoforte was bahmut. you made us to bury a bunch of troops there, which they said needed for the offensive. and you put that the nerds who failed the topic of conscription there and everything else, it’s you, that is, the warrior will be told a minute. and don't bother us at all. you screwed up on this. you know, you 've found a very good analogy, you know. here we are now in front of us with a stick watching northern ireland, the place where we were nearby where the titanic was being built, i say, here is the most interesting operation of the museum ship that did not sail to the end point and what the local guys say, they say, listen, they built engineers are correct. and the captain must ship. it's the same here, so there will always be a switchman, there will always be someone to blame in psychology and philosophy who to blame for what has gone. it is necessary to solve the issue seriously. find a victim that he builds based on what i understand, so i don’t think that it will not be so much on

the mortgage, because he is quite covered. he has support, as far as i understand. american sources. i think it will play for the president his surroundings. here, there are donators to donate to reznikovs, because the obvious yes, yes, but the level is low. uh, that is, just a big move, vladimirovich, for the first time you are talking about possible serious consequences, because here, if our military guys are saying that here , as it were, to some kind of limit, well, intermediate limits. i don't know they came. after that, those conditions begin, which are more likely to solve problems, which for us are already in something else than a big door error. pike - this is the base. yes, she made a fundamental mistake. i do not pretend to know ukrainian psychology, but my humble understanding of the ukrainian national character. here, well, with let's say gogol, how it lined up is a very, very mixel. eh, let's say prone to myths. that is, if you look at the national character

, there is the melodiousness of the epic, these legends, but such a tendency to mythologize what is happening, e, the hope for a miracle, the feeling of a miracle, yes, there has always been a deep religiosity, while there was colossal superstition, a strong walkie-talkie. that is, it was all. yes, and now he's a friend, they say, hello miracle will not win. it won't be in two or three weeks. get ready for this for a long time, and this is completely opposite to the ukrainian national character, which means for a long time . you know, in addition to everything that mythologization, there was also a terrible devaluation. how many years we talked on the air, look, one person was, at the same time for the world there, well, how much they talked there, let's say good words. there, in the address of the same poroshenko at one time, but i mean, there

when the negotiations, well, i mean, i say that the person is capable of negotiating all because he is better than zelensky once again we say what we said, so and then the person, then devalues ​​himself completely the same. uh, let's say some military man who said that i am for such a world and he immediately, uh, says that there are completely different things about those journalists who he said that there would be a war. yes, so here vladimir, the devaluation took place longer . trust in the fact that we can’t operate on the word. it is important to understand what ukrainian history is. there has been a devaluation of political life. uh, trust in the words of a politician. you've been saying one thing for a month. a month later, you say something else, and this is already reflected in the public consciousness. you won’t be able to play another one, and you can’t rely on the past and work like that. if you look at the principles of the zelensky administration, he works with clip thinking. why is he so boring because he

every time the people throws out another hack. and when a problem arises, he comes up with another joke to distract you by burning all the ports. but on the other hand, our boat exploded under the bridge and the third whole russian did not drive a car. yes, you burned all the ports. well, it’s to find those who are calling near the port, and the rest of ukraine needs to go buy, but you actually raised a very deep question, because there really is now, that second plan that sociologists won’t get is that we can raise some then the measurements who do a lot of them, but there is a huge plast of people who fall into the sample and who may look differently . you know the situation in ukraine, oddly enough, but a country that is under external control. she has a holiday called independence day. so it will be on august 24, and i remember your concern about the fact that they may have announced that there will be

provocations. and i want to, uh, just say people's reactions to this holiday. today. this was discussed on live broadcasts of the ukrainian television. people are leaving their cities en masse on independence day they are planning to leave their city. do you know why, so that the answer does not arrive? that is, when you give an example that you bombed the crimean bridge, and you burned the ports, then zelensky can say whatever you want. go buy stamps, but people understand. what consequences can there be if ukraine still tries that day, they are absolutely. regardless. to what the authorities say, well, what is russia to blame for everything. i think you don't need to tell. today podlyak in once again. it issued that russia is trying to discredit the political leadership of ukraine in order to cause fatigue among the europeans.

i don’t know, you didn’t read the presidential decrees there, maybe he appointed the head of the ukrainian customs there, or maybe he seated military commissars everywhere, yes or maybe putin appointed mr. tymoshenko in the president’s office i don’t know, well, maybe then try to look at the site. maybe there is something there. i don't know, i've got to figure this out somehow, because, well discredits, you know, the state duty is corruption in ukraine, well, everywhere you look, under every leg of the chair, these dollars are everywhere, whoever deserves them, yes, there is no one except for russians, but as i understand it, c-c is happening in the country. and, of course, yesterday's statement of the head of the office is simple. she tore the information field in ukraine, therefore , no one spoke out about the issue. incidentally, today he has already apologized and already said that this is not so, and so on. yes? well, it was. it was clear. yesterday, because, well, so it is so it usually usually happens here, uh, and. eh, mr. podolak, he spoke out, uh,

who well, he, in short, a podolak and an arachamia, but spoke out on this matter. well , i will not pay attention to the ukrainians there, uh, so to speak, e talking heads ben move, so i harshly criticized this idea of ​​​​exchange. yes, but at the same time he said the following quotes. so, he said there no longer, it’s wrong there, and so on, but he declares. this is literal. ukraine should think carefully. what part of their territory, they will give. i'll go further, makf is a well-known russophobe before a former former ambassador, which means that at some point zelensky will have to negotiate with putin, but he, as a person who has experience of communicating with putin , recommends him. you say at the beginning what you are ready to give to putin do not offer. just

when the negotiations are over, you will give it back. it is then that the russians are taken away, but because they are russians taking everything at once. well, don't give up right away. you'll give it back later, that is, what i'm really leading to, that's all this rhetoric of attitude that it is unacceptable. it won't be like that. we are for territorial integrity. we are for restoration, we are all, in fact , absolutely empty words, absolutely empty, there is already ripening there, some kind of specific plan is ripening. how do you want out of this situation? again, by whom? well, not at the expense of your loved ones, of course, for some reason, ukraine and ukraine, in fact. none of the asks something will not. whether zelensky is the main one with this or not, you are talking about the fact that zelensky will not stay here suitable for solving those problems that will arise this fall. well, it doesn’t fit the word at all, if if the situation develops as we discuss and assume here, yes, then

it’s clear that some kind of political decision will have to be made, because it will be impossible to solve this problem by military means. by the way, i don’t know, sir, but i spoke rachami about this situation. this is what, so to speak, it is beneficial for russia, that is , to freeze this conflict and take away part of the territory controlled by russia. this beneficial to russia, i know where you got it from. well, it's easy to meet. he just parasitizes the contract. i want to ask me a counter question. well, even, even if, even if we assume the task that was set by ukraine and ukraine itself is spelled out. in zelensky's plan to reach the border of the ninety-first year. is that somehow stopping the conflict? no, well, i'm just, i'm just trying to understand, so you understand, there are politicians? well, it seems to be like well , people are adequate, yes, who should be immersed in these processes with their heads, yes, which have to make certain decisions there,

which i will lead to something and these people come out. everyone is gunning. who wants what. here he just spat, bounced off, sat out, spat again, bounced off. and somehow it all happens, the information field is extremely interesting, but there are specific tasks, of course. you are absolutely right. ukrainians have always wanted to solve a very difficult problem in a very simple way, by electing someone , appointing someone and saying, that's it, this is no longer my headache. we have trusted you. here you go for us all and decide. but you promised. well, i i think you are wrong about the relationship of what they have changed. everything will continue in the same spirit. they will look for a mission that will solve a difficult problem in a simple way and they will hate him, of course. well, that's how it happened. i think this will continue to happen in poland, to use the language of the leader of the world proletariat, dizziness is success in recent days. well, first of all, everything. the first page of the media is devoted to the parade in honor

of the holiday. but most importantly, everything is written by our american allies, the pole was praised in the wings, the americans were praised. what apparatus? that's it for the time being. duda gave an interview there to the washington post, where he said that the contrast had failed. and in general , between the lines you can, in fact, read hinted that our polish units are ready to take control. well, for example, the rovno nuclear power plant is there for protection, but i would like to dwell on another event that took place the day before yesterday, when the minister of defense blaschak arrived, the podlazhsky voivodeship, bordering belarus defensive hmm uh exclusively on defensive means, uh, uh principles, it will form a group along with tanks on the border with belarus , about 10 polish frontier posts will be covered, e, he announced 4.000. well, according to my sources from poland, they said that there would be at least about

eight thousand personnel there. so he named a very funny reason, uh, which threatens the national security of poland - this is the fact that the authorities of belarus encourage the transfer of migrants to the territory of poland and with the support of the belarusian border guards, that is, it turns out that tanks must be supplied in order to defend against these formidable migrants. they are still armed to the teeth, there and so on. here but what is an interesting fact, there you can, in principle , still quote, the commander of the ground forces. so, the kukula said such a phrase that, you know, if the aggressors did not drag off who the aggressor is belarus, russia or the state, it said, if the aggressor will provoke, then, believe me. our response will not be hours or minutes, we will respond instantly. i got on the phone with my polish friend. this is an army officer polish people's republic during the warsaw pact. he is already aged. i

say, listen, how do you comment, in general, what the pole has. you don't have an army at all, do you? she says, listen, this is not for belarusians, and he said, he says, i can tell you. i say, we discussed this in such a narrow circle, this fist, he says, the poles, he says, the polish authorities. they already feel. here is the blood. the eastern cross speech, the commonwealth, they are already dizzy , this fist for entering ukraine says, well , what do you think, if there is a grouping there now with tanks of 8,000 people will appear on the border with valyn, or on the border with goryashchina, well, there will be questions from the vazelensky partner there, uh, mr. duda what do you want? are you gathering people there? you see, as if everything is fine. they pulled there. right there, it means that there are chvkashniks in belarus, there are migrants. now we need to defend ourselves. uh, those belarusian helicopters fly into our territory. we have provocations, a threat to national security, then he says, when everything starts, they will simply calmly enter the territory of ukraine from above, here,

so here, i just wanted to draw attention to this fact, that is, in fact, the poles, well, my opinion is my own actions. well, right now, pushing yourself to the next partition of poland, here is the polish hyena, this imperial one, well, it can’t stop. and i think the section will be dreaming of a perfectly russian flag. he wants to go home, he wants to wait, that even if you say the same , you decided to establish the austro-hungarian empire this time under the leadership of the body.

i will play an important role in our fight and pants carried things, of course, absolutely grandiose unexpected france what magazines can i buy here? let's see. so we bought two observatories from our tv channel, as always fake news. maybe she just developed immunity against the western way. they wanted to extinguish the flowers, her souls, but they only strengthened it. a graduate of the kiev school is fine, this is already kharkov land, where we now have his control. look at them immediately tie something heavy, the problem is, there is no work. well

, somehow he hid here, that you have a tomato here, well done. if you continue the facts that you spoke

and recall political statements, well, first, the statement of the head of the foreign intelligence of the russian federation, then he said more than once that the poles want to lead their troops to ukraine, then there was putin’s statement, if we sum it all up. yana looks at this process from a different point of view. what a very quick scenario i will tell you if the russian armed forces launch a counteroffensive. they have already come and will take away, kupyansk or encircle, say kharkov , the attack of the russian armed forces will begin exactly, then an important city. he is important, he is important in the first place. it's true. that's when my orsk is here million-plus cities then more then poland will bring its troops into the territory of the crisis in order to