[000:00:00;00] please explain that in military language this means what then the answer should be. you mean by f-16 if we're looking at 16? well, what is the answer. perhaps, only one, first of all, once again, so to speak, i turn to what i have been talking about for a long time. this is a question of basing. if they are based on the territory of the eastern european countries of nato members, then they will make combat sorties from there and deliver missiles for boom attacks on our troops. the answer should be, uh, on these bases. is there ours so to speak

intelligence service? uh, it is reliable to confirm that this is the carrier, by the way, these are the aircraft that m-m now have the irish today. these are carriers, but not all of them, but in any case they are carriers of nuclear weapons. there are, of course, technical possibilities to make carriers not carriers, but i think senior intelligence should confirm here. and if these are carriers, they are, of course, subject to destruction, because destruction with any weapon yes, with any high-precision weapon, is not necessary immediately, so to speak, with nuclear weapons, but, uh, application high-precision strikes on airfields and on these carriers, these are carriers not carriers. when uh andrey viktor is hanging in the air now absolutely right. i told already. we had such, when the americans wanted their own, so to speak, ballistic missiles of submarines, there is the concept of an immediate

disarming strike there, e, to start launching all over the world, we told them that our evaporation system works does not discriminate the head on this missile is nuclear and does not nuclear russian approximately, that proceeding from this , it is simple that we are dancing and in general i think it is necessary beat. as soon as they officially transfer the monosim strike with tactical nuclear weapons. why they should have a choice, i must understand, as soon as the f-16 is dragged into the territory of ukraine, tactical nuclei are struck outward in the event america says, we will answer scary than no, well, scary than they will answer. uh, naturally, that is, no big deal. can only show you nuclear weapons, but our tragic nuclear weapons are superior to them, they will be what we do not worry, he will go to heaven. we are in better condition and quantitatively, we have more, so to speak , nuclear weapons than the americans, they are sure that we will not do it. that is why

it is necessary to do this. they think we have too many people who think we don't. why but why? because then he will cut off his way back, we will not be able to negotiate with them. let's first turn off the monitoring system, conduct a nuclear test on the new earth, and then, probably , well, just the steps that must, that is, we must declare, yes, and conduct a number of measures that show that we are directly preparing for the use of nuclear weapons, turning off the monitoring of testing, of course, is not enough to put the troops into a combat state, which everyone understood is and is ready. well, let not solovyov and pavlovich talk about this bushinsky officials. i 've been talking about this for so many officials of the state that you heard him say we supply cruise missiles to hit, and then ballistic supplies. they

will also be in the talam. we are bringing. in which the same status as you do not? is she an mp? come on, here, she says that you want an official, you have leonid, what is officially only to snuggle up with the use of weapons in russia for this. look, that means a face. well, okay. i am important, important, just this is a different state, take it officially and declare it. here is the latest death. you will know everything, here, uh, the ukrainians said that there they introduced resolutions into the rainbow. what to give to prohibit e transfer, so to speak, the cession of any territory. i believe that we need to adjust or e our special military operation and state that the goal is regime change. and do not be embarrassed by the liberation of the western russian land since the proposal was made not by the eastern ukrainians, but

by the western russians. well, medvedev didn't say anything about it, the western russian trees should be set free in these days. until they announced. yes, that 's right, nice is a russian city for the number of people living there. well, rather london has long been known to londongrad. although there are such russians that they will sit on them from there and do not return to these, it’s not a pity. andrey already relate. i have a positive attitude towards nuclear weapons. just not for its use. yes, it is to store at home, firstly, the question. where to use it now in ukraine well , if it is western russian lands to beat on their own, that is, on their own lands, then you don’t need to spoil them, but the rest for now. why why is ukraine as far as now the most mined country in the world, as

the europeans say, but then the europeans don’t need to mine, why do they write blackened correctly on their cities understand? i support the hidden pacifist our manifestation, which does not even use cluster munitions. at least they can already be used because you support the united states, you have already opened the pandora's box of the kindergarten with cluster munitions, but we do not use them on our territory. if we go further, for example, there in poland, then poland has already shown that the guys. we have moved these nuclear weapons closer to you, we will use them. if you cross the border, it's in my opinion, well, well, show which border. pointing belarus is our allied union state ukrainian polyakov and indirectly, well, there we are talking about thousands of combat units direct to him, while we have a conflict with poland

with the state with the polish republic. how many heap? here's a bunch of how many two poles three poles? yes, as much as you like, but they did not understand, in their own did not understand. that is, we can now send a small partisan detachment of thousands of fat people to poland and say that we are not officially, for sure, and the poles will say so. yes, as if the russians are not at war with us. a i don't know, they announced right away, if any private military enterprise of russia takes any action against poland or against the baltic states, we consider it the activity of russia and we all the time whistled do not consider the actions of the russian federation all we should not be an american. we are probably also in everything secondary. yes, not that they should not be secondary after

the americans, then hit the americans right away. what will the americans answer because they will be nobody if they don't answer they won't answer if they are not supported allies, they will be nobody, they will lose everything, ukraine yes, this is a consumable material, right there you can click on ukraine quite easily, applicable they have no obligations to ukraine it’s great nuclear weapons in ukraine work great for god’s sake well, this is our territory, it’s not ours, territory docked. if we are going to include this territory later. i, for example, how many minutes. well, after the focus, that you can’t live there? well, who knows the japanese live the japanese after chernobyl now, after chernobyl somehow there chernobyl without problems entered chernobyl without problems. how much time has passed and how much time has passed really? how many times in the sixth year did this at least someone give an objective how much

was kept? nobody gave. there is, in fact, no one there. there the reserve actually appears a reserve. there, people at the station live and work all the time. and for me, i will say so i do not care about the fate of ivan frankovsky. no matter the life of a russian soldier , the fate of ivan-frankivsk. i can also use hello. and kiev and kiev is not, kiev is our uh-huh and zelensky. at we are there zelensky zelensky is not zelensky from the brazilian for a long time spoke and i am surprised there are three buildings in kiev that need tactical weapons there. why tactical nuclei, and there the radius is small . but we didn't do it either. we do not tear down the symbols of their power. how can we destroy in daniel can we

destroy? yes, you can. or we can rebuild everything . what will we build today? well, we won’t open the pechersk lavra. so they have already desecrated it. i even wanted a temple destroyed and has not yet been restored. yes, and they will go further twice the temple. the truth here is that no half-measures will help here, whether it is necessary to beat or not, the use of nuclear weapons, he has one question, that our army does not have normal weapons, that it cannot defeat only nuclear weapons like that, so the westerners have this question. now now you can take a moment to translate this question into human language. that is , now you are saying that all the billions invested by the soviet country, russia the development of tactical strategic weapons was something that was thrown away money. well, still on the charm.

so i could not win, because then the enemy's weapon was neutralized by the threat of use on our part. therefore, no hot war happened weapons problems. but when they are like that, when the edges came up, i'm all conflict. this is the caribbean crisis. he resolved a man, not a military man. let the korean border have passed many years, but i will explain to you in a simple way, like a jacket to a jacket in the presence of military people. nuclear weapon is necessary in order to balance the imbalance that exists both in numbers and in the equipment of nato and russian troops, usually outside, but also yes , nuclear weapons, therefore, nuclear weapons must be taken into account precisely as a great equalizer, comrade general, so to speak, it retains

its role. as an equalizer that you immediately sweat, if you do not know, i know, if you did not pay attention, if the language is necessary, you look right there i have work. well, i work there with a former military intelligence figure in the past, vladimir bakterbetovich. he said look now what's going on on the tainted front. they also use the double key tactic , the wehrmacht's favorite tactic to start the war. we are fighting directly, not just with nato, we are at war with all the developments. even the wehrmacht, many of which were used and not to see that we are at war with nato , one must be blind. please recommend. here you take it out. i have some recommendations. well, at least, at least you're telling an opinion. yes, how very responsible, how would you say the most popular in the west, you think that somehow in that voice

kremlin yes, a mouse to announce that if they put abrams, for example, yes, even up to f-16 do not reach. well, let's hit the suppliers. i think this is correct. you think it 's right, but together all the time he says, you know, he says, how can you carry blows on this delivery zone. how can a loaded plane fly, you can’t touch the plane of the steamer, he says you can’t. i think how wise he says, supposedly that i say all the time, i don’t remember. i didn't say that. understood, i hope. you never spoke, it seemed in the air. that there is no way to hit on deliveries, but you need to need it on ukrainian territory. o. and why is she ukrainian so first strike at ukrainian now now now now first in ukrainian she knows that she hit the territory where she was or they are hitting

iranian weapons, no matter what territory it is located, that siri that is not siri or only we must be in a white tailcoat, all so beautiful from a butterfly , first strike ukrainian territory so that these weapons do not go to the front. at first. i hit the territory that she comes first from ukraine, first make a kilometer from the front behind the front line, signs for 500 it is better for me to hit for 500, it is better to hit for 100 km. or maybe it's how our military will decide. or maybe it’s not the israeli military who reads that it ’s more convenient for him to hit weapons deep in syria, they poured it in like normal. and when russia says, well, let's fuck on the distant approaches. well, first, go ahead and say that i am not russia. that you have a voice . russia should have been in

the chop of our army a year ago, it is where it is, therefore not run in parallel. let's draw a parallel, because your armies are nowhere to be found. she stands where she stands. remind how she poured came in and how successful it was i remember how it is considered not the most successful was going to occupy. only we are not going to do anything. our supreme commander has never once set the task of reaching such a goal publicly anywhere as the supreme commander. voiced was never named. the graphical point to which the russians must reach troops, it is absolutely absolutely that such a point was not named and the tasks that pursued their own did not really change, because it may very well need a core-correction, but so far they really have not changed for nato we have december 15th. how to call the ultimatum the statement they

rejected in february? as a matter of fact, why this operation began last year. as for the fact that we were just discussing this trilateral alliance summit there, and there is no need to conclude allies through the united states, we need to establish communication. that was the main task of communication in order to forget it. yes, yes, it happens. this is the most promising candidate in the elections for 24 years. there will be no more debate. no, can i say yes? they say that there will be no debate, that in principle, you got rid of it, that in fact , he will not go, but michelle obama will go . there was such a stuffing, i am for alexandria akassia, as now everyone is standing with their backs. no, i, maybe it's more convenient for them to leave him. obama of course. it's an interesting idea, what's stopping him, they give very tasty, remember rolled in the sixteenth year. yes, the last name is obama, but

they made the right choice. they did 4 years practically. now it will be 8 years with the baidad, and with the leadership of the democratic party. and here again to introduce from the biden years. well, i think they can quit. this they can strongly work surname. obama of course, she's already in charge. there are several foundations, she participates in political life, that is, in principle, this can be replaced. she can't take a husband for herself . president husband yes, not why you need no purely legal. she's not entitled to me. why because i have to be the first husband, so the first lady would be the first dzhent, but hillary couldn’t have been the president

, you can’t take the vice president, because you didn’t serve two terms, but the president’s technical cases leave, he becomes vice president . yes, technically it works out, the third term will be for them, so this, of course, would be a good alignment. i don't. no, we are not talking about the election of wives. can a wife take her husband's vice president? they are paired as president. yes correctly he was twice president. all the beauty to you vice president. i offer her the faithful sanderson, you can't still work republicans, of course, that's it. interesting, this week. end of the week, as trump comes fulton to rice street to be photographed. yes, so that i dream of seeing

him in an orange robe. if they give such a one there and how much his popularity will grow, because also when he is a candidate in e, he works minus the president. yes it will work for for the people of this world republicans it's popularity but not on the decision to vote for this candidate. and that's when a man by the name of sans comes out to the sherlyafs there. i honestly think that she pushed the case too soon to sans that she pushed her husband too soon into these waters. the election campaign had to wait for wednesday, the next person to the next company. he is still young before 50 and before american politics, if a person is 45, then he is still generally a youth now, the current situations could be waited for, and then he had real chances, because in the current campaigns, if they bring out they can bring out trump and they don't really show up,

they don't even think about michelle obama. maybe they'll find another one, but if it does, there 's a gray horse like that, then they can knock out the gray horse republic. plus, they still have a very rich experience of the twentieth year, when it will be possible, they will resurrect the people who won the american revolution in the war for independence. well, in general, in short, in short, the very situation in the united states is when we say here you are about keno yes, these kennedys still managed to solve a whole a number of issues of the war, then he did not start the war , the fact began. formally, this is august 7, 1964, the tankin resolution, when congress gave the right to use american troops in southeast asia, and so in american units, already in 1959 . that is, under hayk, there were already 20,000. this is more than the division was. so

kennedy here is an intermediate option on november 22 , sixty-three. he was killed. but uh, then there were still people who could make decisions, you know, the current american administration. really. now, i don't know where they're coming from. these are the ideas about the fact that we are now discussing the issue of negotiations. we have a position that we are in favor of peace, we are always ready to solve everything diplomatically, this position has always been they are changing, but this does not mean that we are now ready to negotiate with the current american leadership. there is simply no one to really negotiate with. at present, when you talk about korea, listen , iran is under the same sanctions, we are with him we cooperate on all indicators on the topic of the same sanctions against korea introduced in 2006. for what for a nuclear explosion, that is, not the proliferation of nuclear weapons. that's when we talk about china let's let china speak. let's have no right they don't buy so far

from iran so far we have we have no right to sell food. the program is still running. paradoxically , no one can, and we cannot cunningly. yes, there to overload the sea of ​​tankers. in practice , it is necessary to abandon these sanctions from political considerations. this will be the first to do, china closer they offer us a hand and a heart so it is necessary in beijing to the question. and what should russia do first, will you listen to you today? let the americas do it first. let the europeans do it first. let china do it first . and what should we have started, we have already begun a military operation, so the first thing we have to do is you are the first to start. so by the way, a military operation. we didn't fart either. started

like a week. they ironed for 8 years, stop. stop. here is directly this stage week level shelling was higher than it is now, if you take the broader thing in the fourteenth century 2007, when putin outlined in general the main priorities of those countries that do not want to live in order based on rules. by the way, speaking, said borey , only a tough concrete offensive in all cases, they are now afraid that we will go on the offensive and they will have very serious problems on the front. yakovka. even on a human , it was always covered by everyone. here you. mentioned, uh, marilyn monroe was the first single president of the united states who was brought prostitutes to the white house

was brought during a government meeting, and he asked for an apology. he says you will work. and he went to the next room, where his guards brought new non-transgenders each time and no letter. then catholics adhered to the principles of the catholic church, and he was who, therefore, he was not interested in transgender people. so compared to him , clinton and monica livinskaya were innocent pranks. in addition, canada gave permission to the cia to launch an operation that ended in disgrace jellied he never regretted this operation. he regretted how but just hair. if they achieved success, everything is in order,

that is, this very fact for him was the most natural. and when he went to an agreement with khrushchev and agreed to remove the rocket from italy from turkey, it was for only one reason. he asked his generals if military conflicts break out, you can guarantee that not a single soviet missile with a nuclear warhead will fall on american cities. they said no, he didn't agree take the risk that at least one american

city is destroyed. god bless america that's how the onion nobody except us all, without

asking the last name. i'll release it today. we look to spend time with children russian cartoons and children's programs,

we watch for free without registration. the work of the entire tech and our economy depends, and the result, of course, to be honest. transneft's pipeline system is about 70,000 km. about 125,000 people work for the company now, those who, one way or another, connected their fate with the oil industry task, not only download. this means that transneft still maintains its characteristics, sleep, we looked at many engineering solutions, canadian and others, but

we went our own way. the source of energy will continue to occupy its share in the world energy balance oil evaporation for a long time to come. this is an environmentally friendly roof 15 years ago. an american error general would have dropped many more missiles and much farther. they just didn’t know that yes, there really was in cuba and what kind of weapons, but it doesn’t matter, that is, never