the patent of the world reserve currency is the only source of theft of all resources through it and everything that the hegemon has. in the sense that there is a large army of living standards and everything else at least since the end of the seventies, when it was formulated , built and launched as a conscious decision. based solely on this once there was entrepreneurship, once there was business activity, once there were engineers. they were the base of the american state. none of this no at the beginning of the eighties of the last century only on of this dollar pillow, they can reproduce both the army and the standard of living and the level of consumption to lose this, which means

the existence of america, which has existed in the past 50 years and felt like the master of the world, will cease to exist. you can imagine the scale of the catastrophe, our friend dmitry drobnitsky immediately comes to mind, who repeats with the stubbornness of a cato that the ruble price is absolutely right.

as a very young man, he joined the ukrainian galician army. there, they were trained as scouts for saboteurs. well, of course, the ukrainians organized it , 6 thousand people were destroyed. bandera

of the western service was kept and used in anti-soviet activities by the evil of the ukrainian gestapo. i have not met. lubrication direction is the most difficult direction i had to take the team on

myself suffered a very big loss, not counting how much we were for 300,000, then we sat on the behu halfway to the right, and i was thrown out. wait, i don’t know what i would have done in that situation, honestly took it. well, andrey, the people spoke in my defense of letters to you. well, not quite so your defense, but against nuclear war against nuclear war is the main advocate of nuclear

weapons. then you have to say so, yes, gasp, but then gasp, but then you started with a scholz. yes, a strange person, of course, this is a scholz. i think that i’m not as connoisseur of the german language as you are, but i think that his favorite word is now in the shining apparatus, so it seems difficult to be a person who is an atlantist who plays the role of the germans, because it’s really a sound democrat that lady. i will not even give her last name, which is difficult it's easy to remember which one, which one is, because free democrats. they were always american greens and quickly moved out. here they are in the seventies

opposed the american states of the deployment of nuclear weapons. now of course. went to a normal such about the american course. here is an easy world for them. god calmly and completely plays the role of minister of foreign affairs, as far as the scholians are concerned, this is still the case with the social democrats. they have such a, well, after all, the party of willy brandt. yes, the new eastern policy. and now he remembers here, well, parties. yes, in 50 years they were freed, how this party has come down to such a chimera of conscience, therefore, to count on the fact that, like some of us , our loved ones really decided that some kind of anti-american movement will arise in europe, nothing will appear . now the truth is scholtsy. see how they did it. cleverly, they began to invite to rallies. here are these ukrainian activists, so that at least there were not only not only cries that i had gone

from here. yes, you are a bad chancellor, but someone supported someone shouted that you we usually support with a ukrainian accent, therefore, in this, the political strategists must be given to americans in the main, we must pay tribute to the same thing happens. dmitry anatolyevich medvedev intervened in our dispute. he wrote, it's a good day for ukraine next. on a good day for europe - said the mister of foreign affairs with his completed secondary education. she is elena ber. god's decision to supply the bandera brothers of the german nazis with f-16 aircraft. oh don't play. there are kids in airplanes in their sandbox. as if one of the next such good days for europe was not her last day. well, yes , well, such a veiled warning, in principle, he will veil it, in principle, sergei viktorovich lavrov, who said it, will be more clear about this. well, if

you put it, we don’t know what this plane is carrying. yes, then you answered, and this is the most. even then it is possible to respond with nuclear weapons, in principle. if we can apply, if they are applied, then there is a great idea, that is , it takes off, and we are waiting, when it will bang panama no. here's how it flies. we are we don't know what's in there. so we can do well. and if he just took off, it’s already possible, yes, probably, from what height can i think, even if we warned, it means that if they supply nuclear weapons carriers to ukraine, then, we believe, we our countries the russian considers this as an opportunity the use of such weapons at the front or at civilian facilities, this opens up to us not only the possibility of never hitting peaceful military infrastructure facilities. for

god's sake, we can hit the airfield because airfields - these are airfields, calibers cannot be disabled. more serious things are needed there , airfields, of course, should be first class. where f-16? maybe that's how the first one landed there, you can beat, in principle, because we can't do it well done. in this, i have always said that we must follow a certain path of escalation. it develops according to certain rules. now we can use cluster battles. boy. charges can not can not. listen to this only morality. they also applied. just us first it is necessary to launch a losharik against ukraine against ukraine, lord. i’ll explain about ukraine, because quite specific countries supplied cluster munitions. losharik excellent, worked. in short, for a long time i wanted to see losharik in action, it reminded me of a ball.

this is a particularly deep-sea submarine capable of solving a number of tasks, after which problems will arise not only for oil and gas pipelines, but also for communication cables, providing a variety of information through which information about financial things goes, to explain economists. yes, the financial exchange of hands and schultz will come out and say, it is unlikely that ulcin will say it. there are other people here. in short, it's likely, janetlen will say. here she is. maybe you don't know how she will speak. well, against. we see the mushrooms, how she can speak even after the chinese bow mushrooms, so the former head of the fed is the federal reserve. actually, i have always treated them with respect, so to speak, because they simply do not steer the financial

system in favor of the united states here. i dmitry fully agrees to build a system where you get anything and more for pieces of paper this system is to save the sixties through the golden path to carry through the seventies to deceive the entire world community by creating special drawing rights and saying that we will soon switch to them, and then from this to refuse to start selling gold, and then to withdraw this decision, the conference king resembles a janets. this feeling through the heavy forties sixties celebrations that i don't love you. yes, it's about the same here. yes around everything around you doesn't like americans around everyone else's toes. after that , after the system collapsed, they lived

for 50 years. andrew i did not collapse the system launched in the late seventies in the early eighties . after the rejection of the gold backing , the fixed rate was abandoned, but it is based on two pillars. the first whale is military power, yes, and the second whale is much more important, about which very little is said is the corruption of the national elites, because no other option would be possible, only my corrupt national. elite was carried out. this is the continuity of stupid unjustified faith in the dollar, military power - this has always been the insurance policy of the united states of all its economic domination, because without this insurance field this system collapsed. yes, but the system itself this system was based on the fact that they poured the dollar managed to make it

really a reserve currency of the seventies, who scored, you can ask oil, dollar what is his attitude to euro dollar issues andrey what is a reserve currency in general, a reserve currency is the currency on which the recalculation is based; it is correct in others. and why is she, and how is a person on the drop of payment? this and so on. this is the general function of money, like humanity's stomach. and before it, it was also cut, i say, yes, the functions for a very limited part of the world and gold was about, but gold is the gold standard, on which the british pound would have been based on the gold standard since 816, it is no coincidence that the reform of the wif fact, when crossed here is this golden worm gold. and what the americans removed, at least something was, perhaps only with absolute corruption from the national elite. it was necessary to raise the economic system for themselves. it was necessary to subdue education. i

had to completely screw up my head. everyone had to abandon political economy and go into economics in order to become this absolute one. thanks to this chemistry , it was very easy for the united states to rule the world, like the french gold that the treaty demanded, when the germans attacked, the gold reserves were taken out quite right, and many countries, since german gold, as a result of 2/3 of the gold smell is not concentrated in the forty-fourth year, the united states in which, in fact, they bought they did not corrupt. they just bought their open open business, saying you guys take our dollar, which is based in the zone. here you first agreement to force to sign. you have to carump the boss, and they did it when they took nazi criminals put them in high positions in germany when they are you, well, this remember they also worked with the elites in all

the occupied places and narrow agreements signed by the soviet union is another matter. why is it a monopoly in the country and all the bullshit was needed for foreign trade then, too, a minute correctly because, when they considered it was refused, therefore the essence, but the tragedy was that even then, after both moved away from the issue in the economy, this discord went into economic brains, including those in the soviet union, in the soviet union at that time there was still no discord when they created the transferable ruble. basically, create the same system, which will already be it was already a mistake, probably, but try to try such a problem, yes thinking, because it was the same. and it turned out, apparently, the same, yes, well, it’s already a little different here, on other principles, we built relationships with ours with ours inside our bloc on such armies and

understand the help of such in the west, if i’m talking about something about the americans not good brotherly help can be called help. well, our troops were standing there, really german troops. yes, we accepted who will rule in one direction or another we have determined, indeed this is a very important element, thanks to the two most hated positions in dependence, in addition to the troops of russia e. gorbachev yeltsin was immediately voted the most hated incompetent rulers of russia and thanks to them they would have lost the influence of the state. it simply disappeared from the map under gorbachev, and he did not immediately begin to build another state. he entered it into the system in a certain

place. yes, we are trying to get out of there, but you understand how interesting, like treats neighbor well. and if, on the topic that andrey is discussing, it’s curious, because then in the seventies, at the moment when they refused to fix the gold filling, we could well then, together with the arabs, stop selling oil for these same dollars, they just began to develop additional ones, because we started to develop. that's oil trading actively by pegasus i say you don't mind you didn't hear to pay for our oil, than that's what they're talking about. why do we need dollars couldn't, because they didn't have it, who didn't have it in the west. no, i'm like our problems. here's class, i'm coming to the store. they tell you, you have it says, no , let me draw you a candy wrapper for a candy wrapper. give away is the buyers problem. but this is

even if we are losers, this is still the most important thing, cartoon. so you believe in it, there is no problem with gold. everything was explained to us . gold is not enough. gold is not enough. it cannot provide turnover, this is nonsense, because the question is not that there is not enough of it, but questions about currencies in relation to them, because gold world would be more than enough. if the rate now is not fucking $2,000 an ounce, it's $100,000 an option. how much does he say right now? now the hut itself will begin, in theory, it will rise in it. raise the issue of returning to gold shoes against andrew you now who to say if someone is returning what will be urgent to me yes, what will be? malka, well, uh,

of course, if we started talking about the economy , i’ll add a few words from myself, then i’ll move on to other issues. well, as for the gold, again question? yes, if we try to switch to currencies, what is it, this is trading in fiat gold, for example, yes, that is, these pieces of paper on the exchange, yes, which, as it were, show the value of gold or physical gold, that is, physical gold is a problem. as you correctly noted, not that hmm, but there is not enough of it in the world? yes, what it costs, maybe not as much as it should have cost, this is a fact, but it is also distributed very unevenly. not all countries have enough gold reserves to pay them off. that is, again it is necessary to create some kind of average system ; they have a certain intermediary, that is, some kind of tree, through which it would be possible to trade it and buy it on the free market. in general, there are many such complexities, but in the end we came to the same thing simply, perhaps it would be a system of no country. and several countries. well, let's see, again, what they will come to at the level of the brix countries. there are different options. but as we can see, there are indeed many problems and many contradictions between the same china and the same india. yes, because china wants. distribute your single currency at the base.

well, in fact, the infrastructure of the digital yuan , which appears gradually and is introduced with different countries, india has a different vision of its vision there, so here, as it were, these contradictions need to be sorted out somehow. in addition, as we also understand very well, the same china has rather severe capital restrictions on the export of currency, therefore, at the moment, well, the yuan, simply cannot physically replace, for example, the us dollar in many markets, because his physical much less circulation. here, although by the way, i, uh, i recently saw a very wonderful question. and why the heck does he need a physical one. well, look, this is real , that is, that's why it is needed in its paper form, when the world is more and more moving towards paperless turns, but even without a piece of paper , anything. why on the phone even without paper defense, firstly, on what with the fact that after all, not in all countries. yes, he is still undergoing such a transition to paperless circulation. yes, that is, of course, if we are talking about europe, southeast asia yes, and maybe, in part, some african countries, which yes, that's just switching to

those same transfers by phone. it is a fact. but in other countries, there are still problems with this. and besides, even the infrastructure of the digital yuan itself is not yet designed for a huge number of people to use it there. yes, in countries like, i don’t know, brazil, argentina and so on. a-a at the moment, china is trying to copy something. in fact, the actions of the americans after the second world war, with the exception of the fact that, as it were, now there is no consensus on the formation of a new system to replace, bro, university a. that is , it is trying to set these credit lines with the cry of other countries by the central banks of other countries. well. we see, for example, with argentina part with the countries about the session of russia including, yes, in order to gradually increase the share of the yuan in these markets and gradually reduce the share of the dollar, for example, and other western currencies. but this story is also years and years ahead. we understand that this, of course, does not mean that in a year after 2 dollars it will collapse, because this will not be. but for the dollar at the moment, as it is in general for the american financial system. the most important thing is that the danger arises if we do not talk about some internal american contradictions, which

, of course, have everything there, can lead at one moment to some kind of big split, and this is a reduction in the share of the dollar and american treasuries in the reserve of the world's central banks, because that the dollar, well, continues to maintain a very, well, strong position in international trade. that is, as long as we do not observe, after all, a situation where some other currency can replace it, but now, if we are already talking about the assets of the central banks of the world, that is, in what, and other countries are stored and e savings, then here yes the fall in the share of both us treasury securities and the dollar, because well, everyone has seen the experience of russia for 22 years and many countries, including china , the monarchs of the middle east and so on, but they don’t want to be in the position of russia yes, when they simply simply have all these assets in the right the moment will be frozen if suddenly relations between them and the united states of america deteriorate to the same level. so, of course, the fact that demand is gradually falling. we are watching the financial markets. yes, if we look at all the latest auctions for the sale of these treasures from american yes, but long-term there for 10 years for 20 years for 30

years. well, very weak demand and profitability. yes, yes, that is, not buying revolves from only one country from china is true. well, in fact, but as it were with china, it is declining, although some other treasury bonds are being bought by the west. but for example, if we take the monarchies of the middle east they continue to buy israel in a certain amount, but at the same time, the volume of purchases is much less than they were two-three-four- five years ago. well, some still switch to the yuan, so here is the processor. we observe interesting and of course. the lower the demand for the same treasury bonds in the us, but the more difficult it is to maintain the public debt pyramid, firstly, and simply print money. yes, because. well, of course, having a reserve currency at home, america can theoretically afford to print money quite a large amount to export. and hmm, there is a surplus of this very currency, that is, to export inflation to other countries, but to import it. well, whatever they need. yes, this and industrial goods produced in other

countries just explained this scheme with the food crisis. what kind of empty printed pieces of paper, they bathed, real food, of course, yes, and in general. i hope that the same euro-dollar market that was mentioned today, that is, the market of all cash dollars outside the united states, will accept all this demand everywhere will always be high, so money can be printed. now, if it turns out that this is not happening, inflation is growing. well, you need to somehow moderate your appetite. and here the question arises. yes, for the same americans, what to cut social spending on, well, somehow it’s not an option, given that in this case, people will simply raise politics in washington to mine vila, who will offer to somehow cut social spending alive. and spending on military equipment is also not an option, because it turns out such a spiral you reduce the cost of the military, and less trust. yes, that's the whole american military machine here with seven hundred bases around the world, well, accordingly, for them , the demand for the same dollars will continue to fall, therefore , such a spiral from which it is impossible to get out. well, that's fine. i think that this is in any case a prospect for years and years to come. now the share of the dollar in the assets of central banks has fallen

to about fifty-eight percent. yes , she was there 60-70 not so long ago, perhaps in the range of 5-7-8 dashes of ten years. we'll see dina quite serious tectonic changes. but this, again, is for the future, and today we mentioned a little the agenda of germany and the tin clerks from the audio kat. everything, in principle, is so, understandable, but the party, although, of course, has trade union roots and there is a considerable number of supporters in the social democrats. i think he is already in favor of a quick change with russia. but of course, no one asks them, but the problem is. on deeper than that of noodles? yes, you and i understand very well that even if the elections are held, early elections , non-early elections in germany well, in general, and in general. eh, it doesn't get any better than that. yes, it will not be better, that is, friedach merz, the leader of the christian democrats, is also an absolute atlanticist. e worked, yes, in the american hedge fund black rock well, in principle, it's already clear what he calls for. what is he striving for? and what what what what consequences will chance? well, yes, that is , an alternative for germany in the form in which

it now exists, firstly, the structure. yes, there are a lot of groups. they are split among themselves. well, plus they are now, firstly, being squeezed by various judicial prosecutor's cases we pressure them. i think a lot of people in berlin are looking very closely at what's going on in the us with trump, thinking, well, if trump goes well, yeah. why don't we do the same in our relationship? they say a lot, they just ban it. well, yes, yes, well, we also understand that, as it were, the topic of the ban itself, but it is very simple, and this can easily be arranged. and the problem is not even only in the alternative, but in the fact that there is a considerable part of such an already tired opposition electorate, which in the event of a ban , the alternative will simply flow. well, to the same leftists, yes, or to the desk of sarah's vaginas, that is, as if with these people you need to somehow do this, so i think, here you know there will be such a two-sided policy on the one hand, they will be welcomed, but offer for example, the place of junior partners in a coalition with the christian democrats in exchange for them taking an anti-russian position there, for example.

the work of the entire tech and our economy depends on the energy industry, and the result, of course, honestly speaking, stunned. transneft's pipeline system is about 70,000 km. how many people now work in the company about 125,000 people, those who somehow connected their fate with the oil industry, the task is not to pump like that. this means that transneft still maintains the characteristics of so, we looked at many engineering solutions, canadian and others, but we went our own way. no, no energy sources will continue to take their share of the world's energy balance for a long time the roof floats on the surface of the oil prevents evaporation. this is an environmentally friendly roof 15 years ago, they laughed at me, and we only

had an oil industry on the line. today we stood in the control room, a different cosmos is the future.

the best historical serials and on the other hand, to threaten legal proceedings with trials and a ban if they do not, in general, about the same thing that we have seen in italy with the italian right in part. and, of course, there was an attempt, but i think the german christian democrats should look at how such a coalition would conditionally moderately right and very right, and it would work in spain because not so long ago there were, as we know, elections. so, just the spanish legalists had hopes to win, that is, it was a homogeneous party together with the vox party, but it didn’t work out, therefore , here, as if the germans also turned out to be a very

uncomfortable situation. and so in