as

a very young man, he joined the ukrainian galician army. there, they were trained as scouts for saboteurs. and, of course, ukrainians organized monsters , 6,000 people were destroyed. western intelligence services kept used in anti-soviet activities. the vision of the ukrainian gestapo, i have not met.

then you reduced it to 50 percent , the dollar rose to 70, and then it was canceled altogether. this is what is now instead of catching up. bank interest to a level that makes unprofitable production absolutely with such a percentage it is impossible to produce anything, unless it deceives. and demand sell all the dollars, and then if you want to work, according to the principle of the market, there will be an excess of dollars in the financial market

compared to those who want and can buy it, the second, which refers to saving. there are not enough ships in russia, but with the military there was another problem of civilian ships. so you have finally created a unified shipbuilding association. so here's what 's going on in the west. shipbuilding industry for example, 16 billion dollars a year to subsidize. how much does the russian government give in your state of 800 million? if you take away from them, you will take away. state subsidies the efficiency of your construction

industry is higher, but it works without adaptation. she works according to the law, like the market, why should the state not interfere? a country that does this the whole west subsidizes its agriculture , its industry, its energy. and you are playing some kind of market, which is never was not that existed in the energy in the food will not subsidize. with the word subsidize

, it means from the moment when contractions were introduced in relation to the russian agro-industrial complex, well, it existed. i think there are about ten different programs to support the agricultural industry, starting from the supply of equipment on preferential loans. hmm free interest and so on and so forth. i just have to tell this for a long time. and the result is on the face today. see how the industry knows it first. to do this, it is not necessary to use the word subsidize, it is foreign, i do not like it. as for the ship repair industry, let's see how to build. come here. sorry, and here repair too , they are interconnected. so here is the shipbuilding industry. let's see how

the construction of the tanker fleet is supported throughout the far east. uh, uh, what is being developed by sponsorship and state programs? e here in the north. well, where are you? this one takes everything and the last process. i don't know what you should be well. honestly, i don't know, i understand one thing. here are two hearts of reasoning, in short, one simple thing. the reduction of the currency of unfriendly countries, the euro and the dollar inflow, in general, as such, into the country occurred by about 70 percent. although our exports have grown. it’s just that we sell for rubles for the currencies of friendly countries , i won’t say something in dollars, which are. let them sell them in the market. that's all, let, firstly, we need to look at how to subsidize and

how we help. we now have a shipbuilding industry that has moved the state bank to bear all the costs. this is the right move, which why should we take the experience of countries that are falling? that is, you get it. we do everything wrong, but we grew up and became the largest economy in europe. and those countries that do everything right, they fell. well, the logic is strange, why take samples of those that do not show the results of an elementary thing, ships are not built without money, of course, but who began to enter this whole thing only from the state. and why should this money go as a subsidy to discuss how you do it, the whole world is lgbt in you. have you fallen in love with us this way? and we do it differently, we win. that is, if i say money in the state, it means taking money from those who have the military-industrial complex from pensioners from teachers. ah, what money should budgets take, not

rubber? there are people who want to buy ships, they pay for them in advance. an old jewish anecdote is a soviet candidate of economic sciences, so i don’t really respect everything, but still it’s not accidental. this is science and when we are told, no, you are doing, how is everything there, is it done right to do it? only later. i say otherwise without money to build a ship. who said that only the state should be the source of money. subsidies mean the state, why am i expressing my point of view since the state needs it the state needs it corporations that earn money on it and which children invest in it need money, and the state needs ships. they cannot get money if they sell the goods for this purpose, the goods must be delivered, so they

need a means of delivery of this goods. okay, let's stick with our opinion. i decided a few words about the f-16. finally , the commander of the air force of the narts said, for the first time, contrary to everything that was said , the f-16 is a fighter bomber. he told me that he was talking about it, it was a bomber fighter. secondly, he said the following truth, and to train a squadron pilot at sixteen, you need 4 to 5 years, to train a pilot, probably, 16, you need 4 years. he is now i will not talk further, the pilot in 4 years. he is even a beginner there cannot be a link. pilot flight commanders need 8-10 years of training as a commander,

squadron 15-20. that is, even if this key learns to take off and land in 4 years. he's worth little. secondly, i will say from our experience, these are not exact numbers. if you want to get 20 years. the course should be started by 400 people who, according to their mental and technical data, are capable of being a pilot. but only then will you get 20 years. otherwise, you will get the devil knows what, that is, a diploma, and you can. it won't make sense to them. and the last when they talk about this plane. during the war between pakistan and india, an indian pilot calmly shot down an f-16 for an instant-21. pakistani.

here's a fighter. so, everything that they say and everything that scares. look at the proportions, maybe a little bit 4 years in ukraine there will be pilots who will learn how to take off, land, turn around and maybe, maybe, perform a night flight without any operations. advertising oleg milovich what is the area of ​​responsibility along the front 25 kilometers deep 40 kilometers, this is the core of my grouping advanced control panel, here the group command complex controlled frontiers position is not allowed to work.

well, yes, i just remembered that the homeland of your beloved means, 16, 17 owned all of south america all of central america part of north america california florida hasa the philippines part of europe italy the netherlands it

was all under this they took out a colossal amount of gold and silver of south america just a myriad what, by the way, was karl marx talking about to young people, and the initial accumulation of capital, which it was, then originally the capital with which europe made its first technological breakthrough, because it is gold. naturally remained not only in spain spread throughout. as they say , by the way, they took part in this robbery. not only does it mean how many indians were destroyed , no one really knows it so to speak, but some territories are completely dehumanized , it is implied that these were, of course, tens of millions of people. who were completely exterminated entire civilizations

cultural values ​​that the spaniards forwarded. so yes, mr. barrel is a prophetic thing to be proud of. this is how it was built, the very garden that he loved to tell europe about so much - this is a garden, and then the french, the british , the slave trade, 10 million according to the calculation of western historians, this is how they consider slaves. it was also taken out quite a lot - two and a half million died during transportation. how many died in africa while being dragged to shore? and b - this is also silent in history, but western historians always have some kind of justification. says that well, this, well, this we are not the africans themselves, so to speak, well , roughly speaking, you provoked. you have created a system. this was the reason for the second breakthrough of western europe, the so-called very

strategic revolution, which is considered to have taken place in england at the end of the 18th century. steamboat. that's all these really wonderful inventions that james had it was just that it was directly related. e trade. that is, it appeared huge funds that they have already invested. so yeah this is the era in my mind really ends and brix is ​​a symptom. it is not a symptom. even this is already a diagnosis, and yes, it is clear that these countries are still, as it were, there are fluctuations, there are more, as if some of them are enough. listen to this 500 years 600 years of the complete domination of the giant, it is psychologically even difficult to accept the legs so far, but it is obvious that this will certainly

happen and is happening and the west, what dima dmitry correctly said, he accurately defined what brix is, what it is anti-western, he understands this. he understands it. and in that sense i, well, need enough to say. i have critical remarks in my address, like any russian person. we are, but on the other hand, listen, i think that's 100 years ago, what was the great british empire empire great french empire, it was also a huge empire. germany in color, which has already done a lot of things, will still do a civil war that practically did not exist in russia xx-1920, complete chaos, actually decommissioned territory, disintegrated territory, and now 100 years have passed and here we are

and there we are guys. we are here, but they are not in the british and french empires. and so to speak, it is clear that today europe has completely lost its sovereignty, it has lost it deliberately. they live with it completely, they know it, they know it and understand it. you know italians. love them. me too. i have many friends. listen to talk to italians. they understand what's going on, they know. yes, we do not have our own children, but they sort of put up with it, because they had another wife. but we not only have sovereignty, but russia is still changing the world that, in principle, we are doing the same thing that the bolsheviks sang about, which today is not very popular in our country. we have found a new world to build. who was nothing here becomes everything.

well, isn’t that really the main slogan of today’s russian federation ? that our country has actually been three times in 100 years. just on the edge catastrophe is the twentieth year, about which spoke, in my opinion. this is 41 years when when the germans approached, as zhukov said, there was a certain one to cover moscow 3 days were scary moments and the ninety-first year and everything that happened after the ninety-first year, of course, we already remember all this, but surprisingly our motherland like phoenixes and ashes bismarck in

his time, as he said. i read a good phrase to me it would say russian is mercury. no matter how they don’t crumble, they still connect with a deep thought, no wrinkle, in general, was smart man understood a lot, that it is unconditional. there is something mystical in this, but absolutely, provoking internal , personally, i have a feeling of great pride in my homeland and in my truly extraordinary people , unusual, probably, so that friends, when we cry, that we don’t have enough, but we do n’t have enough - it's a pity, but not in quantity at all, but as a people there are , so to speak, many examples of this in history, by the way, the spaniards at the time when the lord, or they were. i don't know, just a few million, maybe on the strength, though. this did not really prevent them from creating a gigantic empire at that time, but for all that

, i think that we, of course, have such, as it were, quality with our wonderful fantastic qualities , the extraordinary talent of our people. well, there are such moments, a hat, swearing, for example, yes, maybe, but there is, yes? as the saying goes, until it bursts loudly, we will not cross ourselves. this is also there. that is, i would not like to get ahead of myself. i have a certain feeling to me this feeling that the job is done. and so to speak already further it. well, i think it's deceptive, but on the front of such no one has, well, at the front it should be inside today, we should not be higher here, i observe some such moments. wait, the struggle is still going on, and no matter how historically this enemy of ours is.

in my opinion, he is still sentenced. he is very strong, of course, he is unusually secluded, well , he has vast experience, powerful intellect , he certainly has it, so to speak, and he should not be reassured by the fact that he is led by an insane old man, too, should not be an old man. maybe insane, but very cunning, nevertheless, many of the decisions they make they are quite cunning, so to speak, and certainly harm us. therefore , i think that in this sense we do not need to relax absolutely. we had this relaxation at the beginning of the special operation. we talked about it, and it did not bring us success. and, by the way, it is very good that many problems were voiced in your program. i think this is very correct, and it seems to me that in this sense, uh, and all of you present, first of all, you did a great job and helped. as they say, because

still, it is very important some kind of look, independent but it was possible, because very serious, very systematic about all the apologies and the government and the department of defense. in the industry , it has been said many times that this is. and remember the problem of mobilization, which were in your program. you are simonyan then. and so to speak, many, frankly, are able to. how much has been done? what is it that's right, that is a gigantic work. yes, do not be afraid of people, honestly. talk about the problems you have. well, why am i talking about this, i want to bring to your disputants. i think that you somewhat unfair to him. sorry with all my marxist respect, but he is

right in many respects, but when you understand, well, the system, well, russia, in principle, was excluded from the current international system. here is the current existing financial system. they expelled us and there is no problem with that. you just have to admit it, you need to understand that we have investments. we have nowhere to wait for me, when i wait for investments, except from the state, i am with you, by the way, in this regard, your contradiction, it seems to me somehow, somewhat far-fetched. maybe the fact that your friends and you have such a dramaturgy of yours here, because when you speak. corporations that have to invest well guys, well, we have all state-owned corporations that can invest. yes? well, of course, well, as a matter of fact. all the main ones are everyone who buys football players. these are all state-owned corporations. they may not, of course, need football players with state

participation, but they are with state participation. there is state participation in fact today, they are all yes and the state listen. well it is in this there is no problem for me in this. no problem. sorry, this is called socialism. so we don't have socialism well in that right, i'll finish. i say we're drifting this way. well, as we record, then we use it. so i'm talking about what we still need somewhere at some point. uh, you know drifting - this is what it is when a ship moves along, the wind, it carries it, but you need to inflate the sails to accurately determine the course. in this sense, i think this is important, because we still economic model. we don’t, as it were, i don’t blame anyone for this, because this is a very difficult question for our internal.

i'm not saying that this should be publicly called socialism, because strictly speaking we have a lot, as they say in a society of people who just have some kind of shaking them from this word. okay, they remember that they couldn't buy jeans there in 800. there were still some stores there, but i mean that in principle, in this sense, it is necessary, as it were, to be defined more clearly and clearly and move already to build the economic model that will help us. i think that, by the way, the unconditional growth that we have and those successes in the economy are largely due to the fact that investments began to come from the state, it is from here that investments began to come in. the state began to invest a lot of money in the economy in industry. you talk about it yourself, then we build it, we build it, we do it. so to speak

, they began to invest in the defense industry what they had not done before. and here is the result another question is what this model should be in my opinion, of course with a large element of the market. that is, this does not mean that we need to return somewhere to the past, but it suggests that we need to do it more definitely here and here, and it seems to me that, by the way, this is exactly what the president was talking about when he spoke about what you need. and financial mechanisms, so to speak, it is necessary to regulate and plan, and he said such words in planning, he said such words, so it seems to me that here it is necessary, as it were, to gradually come to a more a certain economic model, which is inherent in exactly the state in which we are, because we as they say we

are moving in my opinion in the right direction, but this is some kind of uncertainty somewhere. we may be still hindering otsta. that's about it. i think you disagree, but i agree with everyone. why do i have a close friend? a very large industry, he did not take a penny , the state created several of the largest metallurgical enterprises of a certain type, billions. he is very famous he was a charitable philanthropist, he did it back in those years, without taking anything as a result of privatization, i understand, but in what years he started from there from the mid-nineties, rising from a small business pious person. very correct not a penny. he does not have yachts, well, they are. by the way, i don’t have a problem with him because he builds,

he pays crazy taxes. he understandable system works. and now you imagine. yes , we say that the state is investing money from the authentic takes them from where from whom? the work of the entire tech and our economy depends on the result, of course, to be honest. 70.000 km. how many people the company now employs 125,000 people, those who somehow connected their fate with the oil industry, the task is not to pump transneft so much to maintain the characteristics, sleep, we looked, got acquainted with many engineering solutions, canadian and others, but

we went our own way. several energy sources will continue to take their share in the global energy balance for a long time to come floats on the surface of the oil reduces evaporation. this is an environmentally friendly roof 15 years ago, we laughed. we only had the oil industry on the line. today we stood in the control room, a different cosmos is the future.

he buys in the interests of whom the ships pay for, that then these ships brought profit to whom the oil and gas workers? who , to put it politely, are not the poorest, who have colossal rates of return, who perfectly afford the luxury of buying what

is necessary to make money.