then we went further, the deepening comes , the si jingki, which has its own concept , we come putin, we finally part with this equal distance people are watching. well , how is it that in russia on the one hand there was munich on the other hand. reboot. there was a reboot, we tried later. with this s- everything ended in the fourteenth year, they began to disperse. it was then that the brix institutions began to form, these three reasons, they coincided now, of course, this is developing and moving on, but order is being built. why is your way easier? yes, all before the warriors ended up winning, there are winners , there are losers, the world order , the winner always determines the winner, he always has a geographical indication in the world order. there is versailles washington, yalta-style building, that is, where people gather and install something, then it develops. we have the first time, the world war, the cold war was a world war. and it

ended with an indirect collision in the presence of nuclear weapons, and an unusual enemy western adversary of the united states, the soviet union collapsed without the use of nuclear weapons . although he has yes, as the chinese say suicide, so the suicide of the soviet union happened, he means a loss and order is being formed in washington, so it’s stupid to say he is unipolar, he is washington. here it is specifically. why were americans with someone in 1990 ? now the bugs kievskaya with an egyptian mother-in-law determines who and what to do with their fingers, once a comrade sitting was called ukrainian. eh, churchill. to be honest, in his place, i used this for the first time, if memory serves.

they compared godin with churchill, that is, his vietnamese dictator in the sixty-first year of linden johnson, then the vice president under kennedy went there to south vietnam and called him that after 2 years, what happened to him? in general, liquidated. yes, here, as if in 2 years, the new churchill is written off, therefore here you need to think for him, in any case , think, yes, and the old god be with him. but the fact that everyone was all churching, then after 2 years they leave this is important. i could never understand at all, i speak to this program several times. where did you get the legends about the great political figure from the people who came out of the war as a winner. not only lost the elections, but lost the empire. yes, that is, de facts, the british empire collapsed as a result of the second world war, but they formally blamed it and everyone else, you can immediately blame it. anything, but it's a fact. data

collapsed yes, it is considered to be considered in the west in the west, too, their heroes should be in good company, therefore, when we now completely outplayed, we are going to the new world order, it is clear that it’s not most likely not, as you say, a major war, but a series wars. and even the victory in ukraine our victory in ukraine next year or in a year, it will not lead to the final collapse, it will not lead the west. and when people talk about it, you finally lean towards my choice. no, by the way, you say strategic weapons are sarts. if you want a strategy right away, you strategically choose what i said again. i generally think that i want to. i just want the british to be quoted again tomorrow, if you don’t scare them, they don’t quote. oh, you can scare others as soon as the germans quote. but when the sarmatian is also in season, the british immediately get excited. so, the current specificity is

that we are in the cold war for russia. well , the soviet union lost and the fact that the war ended, as it were, was not the result that was usually given by the world war. this is what makes the west repeat when you say, there are idiots who are on internal contradictions. and why do you think brazil cannot be split dimura, sex was filmed calmly filmed in the sixteenth year , through impeachment, the westerners do it. here it is built into internal contradictions about the state and crumble these split. this is what the anglo-saxons do, but so far they have not been able to marry the guaido of stikhanovskaya. yes, yes , it doesn’t work out, in principle, someone is something that guaido does not like there. everything, he got tikhonov's from another, so honestly. another fries cutlets, yes, that's why, in principle, i say that here are our axioms that we follow about the fact that you can not interfere in domestic politics. this is where it needs to

be abandoned. it is not by chance that i say that they should be serious states of the right states. we are now protected about what continent? talk about american. and we in africa really do not interfere. well, in africa we intervene. well done need. here's another election to intervene. when did we intervene in syria or not? well, in syria the military is just bored we didn't intervene we help, of course. you just have to, of course, ask very scouts and who are their spies - it is they who interfere. true, we help different things. we respond to requests. unfortunately, there is little we can do. here in the current elections. let's say that in the same united states andrey daviveromos is exactly what we are doing, that's why we don't charge you with this. well, to whom else to entrust, there are such people will be entrusted, in any case, what is going on. that's what such a summit took place. this is a very important thing, in fact, if it should be further developed. we

must provide a large program, which, in principle, will define the future vision of the world. here the same china , for example, gives its vision of the eurasian organization of the eurasian space already at the crossroads of the belt path no no, this name is a vision, some kind of vision, you see, i won’t say them now. well, you understand for yourself. ask and what is this vision he will not be able to describe. why are they talking about everywhere, it means that we first organize the infrastructure that will create a single space for our own in march 1915, putin’s vision was also like, in his message to the federal assembly, the big eurasian partnership hits the big russian one with the chinese one. what but we had a big american partner in 90 now we don’t have a big american partnership, because they don’t enter into

a partnership. it seemed to us that we lived in full sensation. wait, we didn't even think so. we all knew we came to the american world, damn it, and would you admit you remembered all the nineties, what we were told dove people. he's a partner. they explained to us that we are partners of the united states . what do we have? the main thing is that the partner retains national interests instead of our national partner interests. what are the national interests of europe american partnership does not imply the presence of your any national interests. in europe, at first there were no beginnings, of course. no, that's the beauty of it. we've already been told. we were sure all the nineties that we were watching with the americans december killed, we are together here, how cool is europe in the transatlantic declaration of the nineties of the late nineties, where

he studied, declared here by the summer. you were in america at two military bases. no, you read that a partner. this is already what kind of partner was called there, how whom, how agents of influence, or something, so they prepared correctly and marguerites. yes? it was the same. we had a partner. we have a budget up to the ninety-seventh. yes? there they made up the ninety-eighth. they compared everything there . our partners to us as they recorded their pride. remember, it was her who was imprisoned, who was there or someone else, when they wrote down that they helped us to write some articles of the constitution to prescribe something laws. these partners were the garamespart of kirchene. we had a major democracy there. and we are democracies. well, here is the russian group. we are up to democracy. they just didn’t get us taught, because we were quite afghanistan was a partner in nato, the partners of the word are so good. here is its special one, especially

the americans did not use it, because here there was a quite definite thing. here we have have a national security strategy. you had to sign the jokes to write the same and jokes of the new time, you remember, yes, when the ram didn’t take the hut, but the baran took and handed over the herd of volkans. said only one condition to me. don't live, they told you, of course, there are no questions, well, in a fever. we decided somehow it turned out badly. we must do something. let's at least bury him humanly, well, then you need to write something. well, let's write gobbled up. well, what kind of colleagues we are wolves, he is a sheep. gotta show though honestly thought show or not, but you just need

to know the scum in person. so alexandra grigorievich and i have a common personal enemy. and yes, this nonentity received a tinsel in the russian crimea , which just floated like that from a simple slap in the face, who tried to find me and could not find me, went to see me in italy, knows that i’m not there, but in moscow he didn’t come to me and he doesn’t go to the front line, so god forbid he doesn’t meet me there. look at the bastard goncharenko, the executioner of odessa , and i want to say lukashenka. you are a scoundrel. listen to me, we will find you. we will hang you on a pole. we will show your effigy to the children so that they can see what happens to scoundrels like you who destroy their own country and destroy our country. you will be responsible for everything. and gaga can only dream. yes gaga you will not live. i believe it would be in

a bag. yes, it would be useful to bring to minsk. why can't you find alexander grigorievich in minsk, why look for him? come. by the way, i play badly, it is very clear that i was preparing. here i am from the bottom turn off the sound. yes it is obvious that he was tensed up. i think several times drove in front of the mirror. e that commenting on nothing is understandable, everything is a criminal. i think that the people themselves, including draw the appropriate conclusions. i want to argue with you fie-ho. ah, english , yes. right away, you are the product of such a great-power approach. do not speak english, which is spoken in the european union, this is one of the two official languages. malta this is evidence of respect for the rights of even relatively small states. of course they are malta pride this is a nod to paul yes, yes, here, there is

english, well, not native, but nevertheless, so there is no need to distort. well, that 's me, of course, it was a joke, but according to brix, it's actually quite enough. uh, indeed, i would say, not that there is panic hysteria reigns uh in the western press about the summit about the events that u may follow, but some criticism needs to be heeded, because questions of institutional weakness and conflicting interests, they are present, but there is an important the moment at which they try to brikstarped and make mistakes, let's say our non-partners. here they say how strong the west is. in particular the european union, common values. here you seem to be like you, there you still do not develop any common values. this is the approach of the past. here. compare monopoly to the value being promoted. this is respect for each other's values, which

is the basis of the shanghai cooperation organization and brix monopoly and respect for diversity, this is the strength in this new world ideology and this is the difference that is not in once again they cannot understand, they cannot calculate, they think in a stereotyped way. they were trying , uh, to draw a line to criticize. here putin came, putin didn’t come, in fact, russia’s position within the framework of this organization turned out to be so strong that these petty intrigues and, in general , in relation to not only take a back seat to a third plan, and uh, this is a new ideological component that is becoming more obvious. she is extremely important. it is no less important than some economic benefits, so i will emphasize it again. and here's one psychosis, i wouldn't want us to leave. the topic we call them fugitives, you call them frightened patriots, well, saddened , i’ll say that i won’t burn like a father. they will get

bigger and their stools will become more and more thin, because very interesting processes have begun. uh, not even this, probably not quite the west, and our neighbors, who will declare this chauvinism a change in relations. here's to this immigration. they thought they would be like this. ah, how are the ukrainians? yes, only now they will be good russian good belarusians, who understood everything, accepted european values, fled the countries embraced by dictatorships to countries where neighbors or something else do not fight there. and how they are treated there, a very interesting position was taken. there, i would simply say, this is news. it turned out sensational that since the end of last year, only according to official, yes, in fact, the figure is more than 1.164 belarusians and russians, a threat to the national security of lithuania is recognized there, of which there are about

250 russian russians, mostly belarus, you think, this some spies of lukashenka who drove there, nothing like that. this figure was , uh, the belarusian opposition there, those who were preparing a coup d'état. among them there are such well-known figures as olga karych. what he accuses them of, that they are agents of the russian special services, is proof. do you think there are any at all? it’s just that some people, due to certain intrigues that reign in this very immigration, they inform on each other and, uh, they use this as manipulation by the special services to turn to the special services of the west so that they don’t have any of the slightest doubt, all fugitive russians belarusians engaged in political activities are agents of the russian and belarusian special services, therefore they must be sent immediately so that they come with reports and report back. why did they fail the task that was entrusted too right too right? the next

moment's approach is curious. they really began to, uh, have such, uh, a sense of nostalgia, but not for birch trees, but for the income that they lost in russia or for the social services of belarus suddenly it turns out that these people, uh, who hate the regime of putin lukashenko, quite calmly come to belarus, for example, to treat their teeth, in short, because margarita semyonov said. queues for services big money you have to pay. well, there you can shout, then go out to the embassy to stand with a poster, then come normally to undergo treatment in belarus. no, it won’t be like that. we will take some measures in the near future to prevent this from happening, for example, there are foreign passport prices, we will look for those who come and a number of other interesting points. to what is it all, and it's also interesting, they teach them ideology. that is, you no longer just have to say that crimea is not russian , there is something else there. you have to renounce even your nationalist ideology, these belarusians.

for example, nationalism is very specific, like any other. eh, it is believed there that the grand duchy of lithuania was a belarusian state. now the seimas deputies are proposing that the belarusians who are on the territory of lithuania publicly renounce this ideology. that is, so you know nationalize ah, why am i saying all this so that those who are there, many of them watch and understand our program, no, a masochist, or what? are they yes? they hate us, they don’t look, so this is an ideological payment for them, active sobchak well, firstly, she’s just happy, she ’s two people in the world sobchak again, i see you vladimir rudolfovich of our grisha azarenka yes, yes, here she just has such a mania -that. well, let them say the girl. and so, uh, actually, no, no good russians and bad russians. we are all people for them second-class, like the ukrainians, like

the ukrainians. this is good, it can be seen in relation to the ukrainians on the territory of poland. this was somehow argued in one program with our colleagues. how does it relate yes sociological surveys show how the threat is treated. why do they treat competitors well, well, like, well, they beat ukrainian poles for refusing to shout nationalist slogans, well, this is nothing, really, they beat up a terrible price for value. well, of course , they rejoice when they have giant ukrainian the choir performs a bandera song, under which the poles were killed better, but it’s okay , the polish government eats all this with pleasure. this is the government and this is the government, and there are citizens about without sounds, because i will not stand this bandera song normally, so in poland the poles were killed. here is a family of murdered poles how nationalists should react, fell joyfully reveals a song under which bandera.

the bastards cut out the fields, but the picture. and if another picture of the growth of anti-ukrainian sentiment in poland and this is very serious. uh, the factor shaping the polish agenda inside cannot be ignored. by the way, this is another miscalculation of the americans. after all, they routinely built eastern european nationalisms as soon as they were anti-russians, but in reality it turned out that they had a huge amount of contradictions inside. what do you think now that lithuania is more united against russia, belarus, they trust each other. yes, they hate each other, lithuanians, they are seriously afraid of the polish threat, because the milin region is to a large extent populated by the same poles or ukrainians, who accept help from poland there fell in love with this poles yes, in no way scum, all the same supposedly phobic moods that were there, they also remained. as for the south caucasus, this applies to romania, this applies to all countries, there is no nationalism only in one direction. the americans are now heating up this topic by planting a big bomb and, moreover, they are doing it with conviction, this is conscious

, maybe they are mistaken in something for the whole of eastern europe. because the same body mode. this is slovakia, this is even poles. these are regimes that are different from these neo-liberal western ones. they still have an understanding of the national, and in order to destroy it, you need to pit the people against each other, not only with the russians, but also among themselves another important factor. this is evidence of fascism. here russian belarusians are hated not because of the political affiliation of the ideology. whether you love putin or you don't, you admit it. whether you recognize crimea or not, but simply by the fact of the existence of such a culture and ukrainians, the value of ukrainians is exactly the same only in the fact that they are now at war with russia everything is of no other value, ukrainian culture has no something once shevchenko became popular in the west, they drink pavel tychino's poems there, they rue to chervona they sing this nasty bandera one or two songs, which are perceived as absolutely russophobic. eh,

such a fascist element. not more than that, and these factors. uh, we must not only understand, but also use, i'll tell you, just a few words. who knows, he will understand with regard to our fugitives and migrations, whatever you want to call them. there were such cool operations called a trust, a syndicate - two. well, certainly. i’ve just been here just now, melitopol, the absolute hero of this region pavel platov here but you also know what specific confectionery product he likes yes, the filling was explosive fiery honestly, i’m just re-reading memoirs here for an extra charge of literature. police literature and the word we present yakovlevich quite by chance rightly noted the respect for this lady. to german literature, but i have a question. and it's true that

questions about lermontov pushkin were removed from the ege. i saw this, but i think it's stuffing. uh, if it's a hoax, it's not an accident , it's not true. it's within the bounds if it just didn't happen. what is the most valuable thing in exchange rate and stability? a currency is valued only because of how stable it is for a year or two, 10 years, 20 years. this is if the currency reflects the economic one.

state of the state and if the currency is unstable in spite of the economic state of the state, then this is speculation. those who are engaged in financial financial reflection of the economy so the russian economy can scream as much as you like, until you achieve the stability of your currency. it should be directly an integral part of strengthening the economy, strengthening the economy, economic growth and currency stabilization, they go together. they cannot live separately and therefore will not be in the eyes of the whole world. the russian economy will develop until it achieves its stability. 78 weeks from this rostrum we speak almost every sunday alexander mikhailovich i absolutely agree with you. you dispose of me, and

the position of russia among other countries also depends on this. regarding brix countries i want to notice such a thing is one of the important parts that have been taken on this about a nigga. they stand only on the peaceful settlement of the problematic hera without the use of force, these are african countries. i hope that this will also play its role, so that what is happening there does not turn into a big african fire, which the french are also striving for, well, the americans are a little less, but they will not refuse. and i want to note one more thing a small message. the us navy decided, uh, to get rid of

the tricolon missile flights. this is the basic military e, missile cruiser, which is the first that was built by the united states, they have 16 of them, and they decided to get rid of them. and the economy needs a different fleet. all two sides jumped up. we want well, first, ukraine and the second poland , the poles gave the ukrainians a little bit and the poles seriously hope that the americans will supply them and sell them. but ukraine also did not come down. as they say, she did not give up her rights to receive, there are two three four vessels of what's interesting? there's uh 122 tom launch pads, that's one salvo from this cruiser,

122 volumes that's what it was created for. that is, if this cruiser supplies tom with what is there, when missiles are, missiles against a missile - this also has its meaning, this tom and uh, what conclusion is this if russia does not occupy the black sea coast of ukraine sooner or later these cruisers or will other missiles appear on the black sea? the fact that they may appear on the baltic well, russia will cope with this, but it will be on the black and this no one will be able to prevent any agreements, no treaties, nothing and only one thing is that this black sea coast should return to those who mastered it in russia

without it, but it exposes itself to mortal danger, which is even difficult to assess today. strongly i want to take advantage of professional expertise alexander viktorovich we have here the first case in medicine known, when publicly photographs, and from the rule the orientation of a lesbian. at the same time, so much so that she announced it, despite the fact that the consequences can be severe. see for yourself, we've never had a prison picture before us president current or former, and now there is here he is, wow you go knows that this is a dangerous person. oh my god. i mean, i know i'm a lesbian, but this man just made me feel like a woman. you know what i mean. god he's so sexy, what a dangerous sex beast.

look at those eyes. oh my god my woman. this is rachel leading sexual harassment. i think it's possible i think that firstly, uh, betrayed by the lgbt cue plus minus 95 3.86, that is, now it's just not clear how to proceed. it's just outrageous. i think that she should be deprived of her job and sent somewhere to the mines, for example, to the former st. petersburg and not just like this, a more liberal and stupid version of worth's wife, but he is a lesbian woman.

our country and our heroes volunteered so it turned out that our help and our support for our soldiers stepped on two mines. all russia the real story of our people of our new project exclusive premiere from august 28, 15:00 only on russia channel