scouts, saboteurs, and, of course , monsters, the ukrainians organized the holocaust in lviv, 6 thousand people were destroyed. bandera was detained by western intelligence services and used in anti-soviet activities. wow

at the command post of the second corps of major general i saw the book. alexander viktorovich sosnovsky immediately posted the photo and appreciated it, he said it was schnitzel. there was text. i ask dmitry sergeevich, i say. why are you reading? it was we who took the library, the nazis were stationed here. i 'm looking to understand the enemy, and he says, you know what thought came to mind, which explains a lot about who we are fighting in the broadest terms of freedom in the first place. it is the rejection of morality from any morality. therefore, religion is one of the main enemies. because if we talk after looking at the essence of words and

concepts, then liberalism is the idea. in its limit goes back to absolute no chance. that is, freedom as a rejection of any restrictions? including the sea and now, in the condition of the deepest crisis of liberal democracy, which by its nature becomes absolutely anti-human, it is clear we resist. this is not an ideological vacuum. this is absolutely ideological blackness. which should now devour everything around. she does not understand the chinese image of thought, and therefore for them china in this regard is more economic geopolitical opponents, but the truth is, by its very nature, an ardent opponent. for them are those countries and civilizations that build their identity on religious doctrines. whether they are reworked russian classical

literature. or ascending to islam. but precisely for this reason their hatred and desire for destruction is concentrated. now we and i managed to absorb the islamic world, because suddenly a much more terrible one appeared. for them, the antithesis she did not go anywhere, but it seemed to them that they somehow managed to corrupt the idea, like they gradually corroded, as happened with ukraine and suddenly it turned out that no, it didn’t work. this is where such a deep hatred of the west of russia comes from, and then it doesn’t matter. in what form does this explain to the west that they are fighting for the liberation of peoples, that war is peace, that is, it is ridiculous even to talk about double standards.

these are not double standards, this is in fact a classic political schizophrenia. but when the west tells us that the most important thing is if it is at the negotiating table, but not if it is about russia, russia must be defeated, therefore, for the sake of peace, it is necessary to increase military spending. sanctions definitely work, because the volume of sales has decreased. from russia to europe and vice versa but when your russian economy is growing as a result of working sanctions, and your economies that have imposed sanctions are falling, that this is just a person understanding, that he is an idiot, oh what, in principle, everyone is now telling him, from the hungarian foreign ministers to the german prime minister, who said that our problems are developing poorly, and then he cannot take a step and say, because we are pursuing a policy of idiots. why can't he say? and, because there is no europe, it's the same again. it's funny

when europe talks about its freedom, but if you look at the deployment of the us-british forces, it becomes clear that all these countries are not allies, so the occupied countries. absolutely devoid of their own will base usa austria belgium bulgaria great britain hungary germany greece spain italy latvia lithuania netherlands poland portugal romania turkey obliquely, estonia base britain cyprus germany lithuania estonia czech republic on reigi please tell me which of these countries has a base in the usa the question itself seems ridiculous therefore, when we are told that you are free yes occupied countries. your word doesn't matter at all. you don't have any freedom not involved in any other sense. you are generally on the other side of freedom, right? you have hyenas that fill the role.

uh, such kapu in the new american concentration camp, built on the territory of europe , and the main talent of the americans is that they, having corrupted the elite, made them feel that we are all together. they just don't say which one. but of course, i'm sorry, i understand that it's terrible. but still, soviet films do not predict the future. here i have a socially, beloved woman example, and the minister performed kaye, kallas is a real estonian girlish, which just chance is everything. she has big red bankers' dads from the communist party. and grandfather, just in case, is a big nazi, so that every time you can get out of truth , grandfather can get out. that is, from which side, but it would have us deeply embedded.

you see, her muse was sponsored, because you can’t do growths on such nonsense. it just has to be. here is a deeply embedded form there, well, here the newspaper is half a muse, approximately venice in russia, despite the war. now i know thanks to men da pulku that the position is called prime minister minister for you at all, but also as it was said in the soviet film. what kind of kamush found out that her husband's business in russia

kayak influences i come back to your homeland. here. we will meet you with much love, which the sated hearts sanctioned by you are capable of, of course, well fucked. so this is exactly our situation. and it must be clearly stated that the policy of sanctions has failed.

a year and a half has passed since the war, this has not brought russia to its knees, the russian economy is obviously going through its worst bright years, and secondly, the war is not over war becomes more and more cruel. now this has clearly led to the fact that all over the world , those who are not concerned with it are laughing at the european sanctions policy, outraged that a war is going on thousands of kilometers away that has nothing to do with it. and yet, they suffer from it and these friends ask me this question. how is it to be understood, dear peter , when they are fighting outside of europe, then in europe you have always called for an immediate resolution of the issue by peaceful means to end the war negotiation. and when there is a war with you, then you say, let's take more weapons, we will fight, there are no negotiations yet. here's what

it looks like. hand it looks even worse hand. it looks like this. and who invited an american to syria and what are their troops doing in syria and who invited them to iraq and who invited them to afghanistan but i understand that they did not study geography well, therefore, if the pilots of a country that has nothing to do with afghanistan crashes into towers -twins, then just in case, we need to attack afghanistan it's kind of obvious. top attacked here, well sudan just because the name does not like the big philosophical question. well, that's it. i'm serious why they talk about the inviolability of the borders, but during the first second chechen campaign, we were told all the time that we should let go of chechnya despite the will of the chechen people, who voted to stay in russia why did they

tell us all the time that it was important to listen to the opinion of the people, but when it comes to ukraine, they talk about the return of the territory, they don’t care on the opinion of people living in the pocket of donbass zaporozhye kherson who clearly expressed their relationship. why are boundaries unshakable? and the gdr no why the border is unshakable? and where has yugoslavia gone? why can't prime ministers and macrons be overthrown, he says? no, i will act and communicate. so much with the president of the niger, and not with some appointed yanukovych and me, huh? but what? and venesa or guidol, where did they find it, and who raised tikhanovskaya where? well, will you be consistent? well, it’s impossible, because it’s already impossible to keep track of the macron. that is, he

this weather vane rotates at such a speed that it’s just never just a man you stop somewhere and again a song sounds in the air there and there emmanuel france has a little chance with such a spinning figure of a micro-napoleon a little it’s not even a complete golia it’s dirt from under the nails moreover, a completely different character of a certain marshal putin well , that's how i am, an evil person i can afford dmitry well, this is not even two-thirds of peten. so here is the captain, at least there was a biography, which, as he believed, was in the fortieth year. he is lucky sold. yes, but then, as they say, everything turned a little differently . they raised about this emptiness of globalization,

when they told us and sold us globalization, that it should be part of this global world. well, after all, they told dasha about the economy , globalization is an economic system catching up with socio-economic modernization, some kind of word there was investment, what is it? no one knew for sure, but everyone knew it was good. they can only west yes it was amazing but so no less. it was a fact that globalization was being sold to us. as indeed some kind of economic model, but it turned out that this is not an economic model for the economy. it all has a very distant attitude of globalization - it is an ideology, and the ideology is basically totalitarian. you were supposed to be just like that and nothing more. and if you're not the way you're supposed

to be in globalization, though not, but the worst thing about this globalization was different in globalization in reality. if you look, as it were, in its extreme forms, and it would have reached its limit. they have already been described, and, as it were, conceptually , the study would be carried out behind the wheel. now you read what was written, there are two zero ones there, as it is now customary to say until 2010-12 , this is now reading this is actually strange. in the extreme form of globalization, this is no less, but he still believed that some person should be either over, or not yes, well, we’ll figure out how it goes, but in the globalization of the name of the twentieth-21st century, a person was not needed and the most interesting thing is that the fathers of this very globalization are on in the middle of uh, 2010

years. well, closer, uh, to the epidemic. e covid. they did write about it. now you will read the same thing would go there, here is the great reload and i want to ask. where is the person? yes, no man, but there is technology. there are social relations. there are neurons there. there is a scary thing to say artificial intelligence is a person, and there is no place in the place of a person is emptiness. here the emptiness sooner or later gives rise to darkness. only she is darkness, this one fills this void, where a person should have been in those societies in which there is a certain predisposition. some social ties are weak here. and by the way, it’s not a fact that this is empty blackness in the place of a person for a month of greasy relationships, but the thickest in ukraine . we just don’t know, we just don’t

imagine some things are connected with european states. and this topic will be with us for a long time, therefore, when we talk about ideology, there is no need, no need. we must always proceed from the fact that it is not a person looking at an ideology, but a certain ideological framework for a person to remain a person, and not be a beast. well moving on to the good new news for the mini- there are some too. i don’t speak out about ukraine, but i can’t help but pass by mr. zelensky’s wonderful form that democracy is not for you to eat dumplings. yes, democracy has to pay dough for democracy yes, go and pay for democracy. and we will set it up for you so

it will not seem a little. yes, in general, as if listening to what they ordered democracy, well, pay another bill and you will have democracy, but the most interesting thing here is one other country, america , which honestly says you want to choose. give 5 billion. usually, any country in the world has its own direct ban on the use of strange company financing. and here is such a clean guy, he says, well, you need this nonsense, give me five yards and take it and you can immediately send some paper you want, but fear is a friend and fear and humor at the same time. here. we talked a lot, including in this studio , but about the fact that we are rapidly converging on the ukrainization of europe and it happened right now, if you don’t look at some

linguistic forms there, it’s very easy to confuse, but it’s so pure in russian translation gm. unfortunately, we all know by sight. and if you don't know, there will be a european and ukrainian politician in the face. you can easily confuse and you are already farion savings. we can easily confuse this and the other are nonsense. uh, so to speak , completely without any reflections, but look at this whole five-yard election story from the point of view of a precedent for european politics. but if possible in ukraine a. why not? there is nothing more terrible, i’ll tell you, why is it impossible in france and in belgium why is this impossible where nato is, where, so to speak, command nato centers why can't elections be held with external funding? and? understandable where to get the money? yes, and spain, he suffers with

these rulers, and in italy, how will it be good? and i would like this precedent . hmm, about democracy dumplings, but only ukraine would not be limited, and the second moment, which i was very very curious about, was a moment. and look how the reaction changed, by the way, this directly concerns our wonderful person hmm macron, how the reaction to brixuhannesburg themselves changed. here the first reaction of denial of this was not. second, the second reaction of denial is all nonsense. these are some small people gathered incomprehensibly. why the third reaction is denial, because they will not succeed and

around sunday at noon the fourth reaction begins. the hysterical cast is removed, the client is leaving. we urgently need to share them all , kept smart articles. what arguments did the record hold for 3 days 3 days, what arguments did the smart ones give in order to prove that this is impossible, that this is not. this illusion is a deception and then broke through. why did the macron run first? and because if you carefully look at the map, how the old, so to speak, members of the founder of the founding country , brix and again, joining and a possible second wave, which may happen in

kazan all this in a year, were distributed, then there is a lot of interesting things there. there is a corridor providing a corridor north, south, right up to the indian ocean, its africa, there is the salvation of one of the oldest states in the world, which is very serious crisis. this is ethiopia and really losing such historically important statehood. this is a tragedy for all mankind from the religious cultural. from any point of view of one there is just no europe a peninsula. there is no europe in the new world, and the map shows that this is a peninsula enclosed by the atlantic ocean. excuse africa, and this, in fact, is the new role of europe europe in the new scheme of the new, even if it will be two worlds, even if there will be

a eurotaantic world and the world of brix well, yes, let's start although i am very skeptical about such global projects. all the same , there should be some things built on operational interaction. but even if there are two worlds in this euro-atlantic world. this is a suburb, a margin at the level of an almost wild field, which they themselves created at their border in the form of this chaotic ukraine. they themselves created a situation where they are not economically self-sufficient, when they do not have the tools for economic growth, when they have they have a war next to them, a civil war is really raging in ukraine, which may well spill over to them, they did it all. they are hysterical from here, and i will say this, firstly, they will spoil, and

secondly, the number of intermediaries who want to talk to us. for the world will constantly grow. well, that's not bad. well, i, like dmitry, can’t say beautifully, probably, but i’ll probably have to philosophize, too, first in a completely specific way, if ethiopia is egypt in brix and south africa in brix. maybe we can resurrect all the villagers. and let him build his own way. then he brought it to half. just the half that has already been built, and now to finish the top half and everything is fine and it works right from moscow to cape town, huh? quite normal. i rode very nicely south african trains can be awesome it is. well, okay, that’s right, and now about the philosophy of the west. after all, when they started talking about no, that’s it, it’s

a terrible conversation, and you know about the inhumanization of this, when it started, it began, in my opinion, i i can be wrong. here , probably, her specialists are better than me in this sense, but i feel that here is the real exploitation of man by man without any reservations and looks. some sort of morality began with protestantism. when the spaniards plundered south america. they plundered it under the slogan, we are now converting everyone to christianity, and those that are poorly converted, we will simply liquidate them. the americans, coming to the north of the continent , did not convert anyone, they simply liquidated them. and that was just the turning point, when religion allowed self-enrichment without any other thoughts. and in fact

in protestantism. the man chosen by god is a rich man. a? how it happened, so this is fate, and this is individualization. a person before god when there is no other responsibility around you. although, i will immediately say that, of course, great protestants. those same rockefellers spent gigantic amounts of money on social projects. but this is purely human, that's how he was, but in general , it's not built into it, not compassion is not built into it. not mercy there. not mortgaged there is a very pragmatic relationship with god that allows.

to lead life as a project at the end, which you need to give a result, and then how it will turn out, by the way, here, and the second part of the anglo-saxon this waste is project and we see this project, now, if china existed, the eternal will exist forever in chinese head the same thing in india , then america thought about how the projects are being carried out, how the project is very strong precisely because they understand that the project is somewhere. ends, that is, it will not end, of course, we understand that he will somehow survive these united, he ceases to see his end. what will be the end, positive negative and so on. that is, we now abstract all this we know. well, when we had the nineties, when we had the eighties, we can look back 1,000 years ago and said it happened and 613 remember

getting out. but what they will say, they have not yet had such a thing, when what they were building, they were building all the time to the positive all the time every next year gave them more and more and more. and now it's not obvious, that is the empire, which is a republic that has turned into an empire, it stands before the end of the project or before, but in fact it was a project. it was a project of global expansion, which was carried out by appropriate means with emissions with military force and so on, as the project should be. and what did they always do when they stumbled, i'll give you an example of something, what happened on the horizon of the nineteenth twentieth century, when they were faced with the fact that this is

business expansion, british american, well , a little french. couldn't go any further not poking around in those empires of europe that were there in the austro-hungarian to the ottoman to the russian to the german and so on, they began to openly undermine them. a network structure was created in the same way as the internet is now through newspapers and newspapers, in which great proletarian writers also participated , who also wrote under the pseudonym gorky , in my opinion, and so on. yes, and 20 years undermined the foundations of these empires. none of these empires survived, not because they went to war, but because they went to war. with an undermined psyche, already beaten out from the inside under the slogan of which we will put liberation , liberation, first of all, control. which

empires represented there were rules of the game , hard rules of the game that didn't allow foreigners to come in and take the piece they wanted. and what happened was that they shattered , broke all these empires, systematically for 20 years, by the same means that i now use information warfare, undermining bribery from within, and so on. well , naturally, once they couldn't go further. they used personal resources, that is, the mission. that's what i'm afraid of right now. i am afraid that now buried in brix they will do the same, they have no other choice. they don't know anything else. they will systematically undermine all the brix countries one by one. they won't be able to do it. that is, they will succeed in something, but their calves are simply not the same as

they already have the consolidated one, they no longer have a moral. and how should i say it, even superiority never had a moral drive, which was when they represented and pansionality and then they look like young democracies, especially the american one. yes, when they came to europe and they said, look, we are bringing new worlds. we have built a new system. she's more, uh, she works better, she's more fair, and so on and so forth. now they don’t have anything like that, but they won’t undermine it, and in any case, what we see here, starting with the steering wheel, how the flywheel works, a crisis is created. under it, money is printed for this money , a piece is captured further in the seventies, crisis, the reagan printing of everything is captured a piece and