well, let him say it publicly, our project was european nazism, but with the human face of teribertons. well, not like in hitler, but hitler - it's bad, yes, but from a human face with curtains you regularly remember pitten on it normally. yes, by the way, i think that he is about to be rehabilitated as a political one in france . i think that we will still find hitler's rehabilitation . also saves

sewer living talents eugene gypsy overhauling the entire country overhauling property. oil fell film alexander the great one of the generally still unaffected. earrings should depend on them simply third. stories soon

used to watching videos stopped working install open watch russian channels and all series movies and cartoons educational programs and documentaries . here you say what is called a pause according to

stanislavsky, i do not agree. i 've been reading the magazine communist usa since morning. excuse me. handicap on the queen, he is so temporarily transferred to english a wonderful article. there , in our magazine, the communist of the united states of america, i will not name the authors, these last names will not tell you anything, but underlined this article, nothing was written by politicians, like a breton. not even a retired scumbag. like bolton, researchers wrote this article called the european geo-economic revolution article summary everything, it was conceived, everything is cool. a geo-economic revolution has taken place in europe. it's nothing that europe decided to lose cheap

energy carriers, is it okay that the food crisis in europe is nothing that europe has become basally dependent on the united states for financial matters , is this normal? this is how it was intended. this is a european geo-economic revolution, and it is completely simple in all seriousness, but we need to resist the pressure of the americans a little more actively. and we need to put a little more pressure on china at this moment. i just stopped reading further away how they, with a degraded economy before industrialization, are going to put pressure on china this is such a big mystery to me. this is written by people who claim to comprehend the situation in europe this is not propaganda for politics, if stoltenberg would have written it, well, he is supposed

to write such things, this is written by people who, apparently, sincerely consider themselves intellectuals inside, therefore, when we say that europe and the west are moving in the direction of the soviet union, er, leonidovich brezhnev's time. i want to say this is not true with brezhnev's such bullshit. here is such garbage, even in the communist magazine they did not print, because the owls. if you were people. in general, by the way, it is very interesting, the americans did not hide anything. so we said, i absolutely agree with you about chaos, that sooner or later it will affect everyone, well, the americans wrote it openly, we take it at least in russian, at least in english, at least, by the way, you will translate the memory into chinese. richard hus's book , the world's disorder, it's all there. here it is written how the united states will

abandon permanent agreements and move on to solutions. how beautifully they call it hook, and in russian it is called. well, how will it turn out, how will we be polite, yes, yes. here's how it works. it was all written. and these are all european intellectuals or yes , you don’t know, come on, that’s all, this is some kind of nonsense. here we are there in the sixty-eighth year they lit it there. yes, we'll show you now, but in general, i 'll tell you so. the degree of degradation of europe complemented by its economic degradation, here they say the geo-economic revolution. but if you look at what e-geoeconomic europe is now, it completely excludes any options. i even now, i’m removing the ideology, so to speak, taking it off the board, but completely excludes

any options for constructive cooperation between russia and the european union in the foreseeable future, what is at the national level, we need the national level and literally the last two phrases. i agree with dmitry evgenievich about the pope of rome yes, in many respects it was a self-defensive phrase, because if there is no god in europe yes, why then a dad, if there is no god, if god is crossed out altogether and he defends himself, but still what - something he has moral standards have remained, but still, but still, we are offered him as a political figure. he is offered to us as one of the possible mediators, no matter what, but there is no such question as a mediator. ok then. we accept him as an intermediary. well, what we agree with him, he says something, then two pretzels come out. so,

which they say, no-no-no, guys no no, and you didn’t understand everything, so that’s all. yes? he said it, but he didn't mean it. doo ah , we will now explain to you what he meant. and so this is, of course, a very serious question. and this brings us back to the topic. and that so many mediators about the negotiations have become a bolt bolt says bolton, who wrote about the peace initiative in ukraine, so all the people of this. well, it's just nothing so all over nervous about something. that they are so running to mediation, and i’ll tell you, and they need to remove the topic of ukraine from the american political board

in one way or another in the very next few weeks, because if it remains in the form even in the form it is now , she will burn them all, but this one they do not want to. by the way, i'm very disappointed. well, because i, as a person of the outgoing generation, well, listen, age must be understood. it seemed to me that they should appear. new bright witty daring, but they are not visible at all. that is, the worst thing is what we observe in politics. well, in principle, this is a phenomenal level of dullness. well, yes, there are curious guys, there is hungary. yes funny guys there appear republican party. from the business circles

of indian but this is still not a level. we see neither new concepts nor new philosophical schools are not attempts to comprehend, we do not see it all. we actually see some level of advertising campaigns. 3 minutes into the ad block there is no comprehension, that is, it turned out that the european philosophical school exists, and this is an economic one, that is, it seemed to us all the time that there is something you will notice schools, there were no scattered speeches of people who have some funny titles, but when we are in all seriousness forced to discuss with you, bolton. well, the man well, whom trump well deservedly called just an idiot. not alone bolton's prediction never came true, and bolton did not complete a single thing.

that is, every time we talk about people who are absolutely politically losers and if we talk about the scientific plan, they are about nothing, well, for example, yes arrestovich, what is this? well, in principle, so khlestakov was charming. and it's not even charming. and when we talk about the pope listen, i'll tell you this. i respect the pope. i don't like his attempt to play some kind of politics, well, by and large . he holds a position which is post this is a ministry. i don't understand by the principle that says you know, i'm tired of something. i, perhaps, rested me in retirement, that is, for a minute. but what about raspberry about the bowl there , the garden of gethsemane, what does it mean, like these popes, i don’t understand. but the pope is a man who, by and large, should. for the whole

world your soul. put praying must. and when someone starts to get it through the lip , it's better to keep quiet. after all, you look at ukraine , sinlessness assumes the function of the collective pope of rome. petty anger some twelve-year-old hooligan at whom everyone is looking, he thinks, lord, yes, you cretin, can you be beaten with a crack? you are not what. well, it's not that not able to name a single philosopher, who has given this direction to a person of hateful thought, not a single great writer, not a single great poet. there are no such people who do not speak ukrainian. women are representatives of this line of thinking in the coronazi and they suddenly claim to know the truth in the final

instance. and they consider themselves entitled, as they senior nazi brothers cancel. but if the german nazis abolished the degenerate, how they read jewish science, jewish culture and everything related to the game and went to jewish doctors for treatment. then these same ones are also trying to cancel the entire great lent of russian culture. and most importantly, nothing clicks in their head. that is, by nature , we are dealing with an absolute boor. it's all biblical history. here, if you like, three slavic peoples reproduce the biblical story. where the ukrainian people act like a boor betrayed his father? in my story, my understanding, well, again, this is just my very honest opinion. well, you are absolutely right

in your speech. absolutely yes, that is true, but i also think about it, in my opinion it is. it corresponds to this level of development of the capitalist system in which we live. she entered this truly global capitalism. in general, they did not take shape legally. actually, this is global capitalism, by the way, different from capitalism. there, the beginning of the 20th century of the nineteenth, in which individuality was important, and there were philosophers , musicians, all of this bourgeoisie. she gave birth, by the way, and culture.

look what's going on, well, young people are brought up in the same clichés . look how they are raised. so we are surprised that we have a lot of people there whom we call traitors, which we are surprised about , and they are 30 years old there, well, 30 years old, his first film for children was harry potter they haven’t watched fairy tales, they don’t know them, they don’t know, no, no, no national russian songs, there are some, well, ours is there a separate diet, which is there chechen, they are very it they probably know the rest of the children. no, they are so brought up that we are surprised at them. well, if you are brought up that way. well, you will be like that, and most importantly, it levels. everything here is what the united states has offered

to the world today. and in general, it worked, they offered such a world of consumerism, and it is one everywhere it is one, and they have such and they have the same, therefore, they grow such politicians, therefore, they are all brought up in a single system. you understand everything this, if we talk about, so to speak, who else causes some kind of hope. it's more likely that the africans are there because of the same. they are just less developed. and by the way, since it is still in russia, but it has strongly entered this system, thank god, it is not completely. therefore, i think this, if there were another 10 years, and that’s it, there would be no resistance at all. you are talking about nothing, everything is everything, as they say. creates one

person. this person - this completely destroys individuality, and she is in this they have succeeded it must be said, and this is indeed on a global scale. this, of course, is terrible, but that's why we and politicians are such cultures such everything, as they say , and wait for another time to freeze, science will be like this. that is, for the time being, science, as if something is masking something right, says that this intellect will come to you, like its excursions, and everything will become clear at some point, that they can no longer understand, in general, what is it it, but this is such a system, which in my opinion. here is something you are talking about. here she gave birth. here is a single this one. we have it too. by the way, she started working for us not from the ninety-first year. in principle, it was already nikita sergeevich who laid

the foundation when he abandoned, as they say, from , let's say, ideology, if on the bolshevik yes such a revolutionary one, so to speak, again i don’t justify now. i'm just explaining, i'm stating. yes, and then i do not poke. it is actually all of it, as they say, the story is, of course, nice, so to speak, with nixon, all these agreements were all there. well, it was all this and we have a society. basically, it was ready for the transition after the ninety-first year, but we grew up in it, you think, remember, what it was it was also already in many ways not completely not completely, therefore. hence, by the way, this question is interesting, which dmitry played the italians wonderfully. yes, they are. well, you show the italians who say that sovereignty. no, i have seen such italians, but the point is that they clearly do not need him. that's

the problem. what is the problem here? here for us for us yet here we are here before they thought what you need to pretend that you need. and now you can no longer do it. that for them it's not a problem, not a problem, not a problem, i don't understand that it's all part of this global world again, in which you don't need yes. and why do you need sovereignty to feed you there, let it all be so to speak, someone will settle down, who will give you the opportunity, that's all. that is, no matter how hypothetically not bad. for intellectuals no well, we want some kind of freedom. all right, here you have flags there, i don’t know what say, the special forces there are lithuanian, sort of, sort of like, well, this is seriously state-owned powerful lithuanian special forces, by the way, they fit , yes, in this, by the way, i think the problem is our

ideology, because we kind of often say that the main thing is to achieve sovereignty , and it falls into this mass, which sits and listens. and what will we get for this sovereignty, then? and we need it here in the form in which you want to achieve it. what will you give us? what do you offer us in return? what for we need it and they i still don’t have them in this absolutely i don’t know if these passionate forces are there , true of course the world is arranged in such a way that you never know what it will turn into, but today i am what i know, what i see, i have been to the west many times, but they are like that. this is absolutely not necessary, they are absolutely indifferent to sovereignty. and most importantly at all levels, so when we try to address it, so to speak, it's a little

like that. strictly speaking, they don't react much to this, and some, maybe not some, but serious problems are reacting from here. we we do not have an alternative project that we can offer the world. they are sitting here, they, in principle, understand that they, as it were, also need it. uh, to all those african latin americans. they need some kind of, so of course you don't want the americans to run over. the main thing is that it is absolutely theirs, but on the other hand. what can we offer? what is the alternative, but today? unfortunately, i do not see it, because i speak sovereignty for them. well, she 's not very convincing. and what are we going to eat? shall we eat something? what will? who us will you guys feed? here, as if this and in this sense, of course, that is, the soviet

project of the best years, it was some kind of alternative, why did it thunder with such power? shop twenty in the thirties to the forties in the fifties still worked in the 60s. this one worked so to speak, because it suggested the creation of a completely different world. maybe he lied. i admit that they do not lie. wanna win. promise the greedy rich. to the vicious, as they say to the chaste, innocence, but win the americans lie, well, win win in all over the world so far they are winning even with the terrible state in which they are this terrible this one, therefore, all the same. we need some kind of project, it seems to me, to formulate. it's about it. we often talk, but how would he seem to be, it seems to

be articulated here. well, here, as it were, not quite definite, respectively, for many. i think it looks. okay, we understand that it's not all that great. well, what are you going to give us? we are now leaving with a claim to generally reshaping the world. seriously, i like it, but it needs to be somehow support something ideologically. that's why, in fact, everything rests again, no matter what they say. here is the situation at the front, that is, everything is decided there. basically, as they say, for now. and it all feels like the whole world is frozen and waiting. here's what the result will be. bye. thank god yes, we have the defenses to say this. well, in general, let's say it's true, this is a positional war looks like a positional one. moreover, it does not yet appear with

any attempts to turn the tide, even if it is of local importance. even this is not traceable. here it is important, very successful. if there will be some success. this can very seriously swing the entire structure in our favor, so of course we still need to. eh, probably, we still need to somehow take some steps, in all cases it is not clear in number. there they use cluster weapons. why don't we do it? this is incomprehensible not against civilians, of course. so to say, nothing can be done about the war at all, so some steps. of course, it is necessary to undertake, and in any case, so to speak. today, everything

is decided for us on the battlefield, given that i i repeat that ideologically it is still the situation. here is an incomprehensible connection precisely due to the fact that there is actually no project. we are not yet able to formulate this precisely . in fact, i didn’t just formulate it now, dmitry very accurately formulated the project to survive in his time. well, to survive all the same , the project to survive must be covered by some kind of ideology. why should anyone eat it, who will we be on whom? i don't understand the design, should it be covered with a fig leaf or what? does he owe anyone? well, because ideology. look here. i say wait. i say, first of all, wait. i know that you are facing death, this is the ideology that is genuine , to know that they want to kill us and that we

will not be left at all, as such in history, and the word russian has become taboos. and this is what we have to win. so what is more here. excuse me, this hamlet point what 's in my mind, in my mind pain, because the very concept of surviving, you know, it implies not only victory, it implies the issuance of captivity. here, as you understand, that's why i say, we need an ideology, an ideology that leads to victory, and to survive. forgive me for surviving. well, yes, let's survive. why are we going to fight? here the french survived in the fortieth year , the french did not survive in the fortieth year. no. no. well, they didn't survive no, but here the country is. of course not, they didn't survive. yes, no, france no , that's another question, he doesn't need it. well,

it was needed.

we'll take care of this. it will be the honest detective.

no one needed france was napoleon bonaparte then stalin got up, found a degulia and france needed it, because stalin needed degul. if there was no stalin, no coal and no one in france was one of the winners and did not investigate security.

well, we understand everything. is it true which of france win exactly? they did not survive at all, only the winners survive. this is what he says, no, i all the rest dissolve. what does karen georgievich say that there is no value for them? for them, their individual life is important. i do not see it as a big problem, that for them something is not valuable. this is a big problem for us because we have sprouts of a complete rejection of statehood from thinking big fuck are sown, so now when i read articles in the same merchant, when some young man writes, i wring my hands, well, you understand, the dollar exchange rate. this is also due to the fact that the speech of costs may be going against the will, but the third one goes to the military-industrial complex. if it's bad or whatever you want to say, that's what the boy is all about.