it happens and now, in fact, it is still not clear whether they will be able to crack this structure, because even in conditions of capital danger for them personally. well , because, as it were, well, if something starts. remember the us civil war. but it was very bloody, very brutal. i will answer in biden's strength. i have a lot of them out there, but i told this guy. in fact, it’s also like everyone there forgot about the constitution, how is it and so on, but they, of course, they, of course, will take up the issue very seriously with each other. i'll show you when i can. you just commented. here, to make it clear what a mighty old man is now controlled, united in places. listen to him being asked about the election campaign president president. yes, mr. president, how is

the election campaign going? why does he react like that? he also said that when the presidents are in my presence. i think they are treated as cabs. is this a normal person? and the fact that i said that i answered in biden style, and he became famous here, so the sixtieth anniversary of the founding of the civil rights lawyers committee a and he speaks and talks about that personal merit when he spoke thurmond's string to vote for the civil rights bill. right before he dies, listen. all we have to say is clear, emphatically as emphatically as we can, that hate won't prevail in america hate won't prevail in america but stop you stronger. i think everything has changed. i was able to literally and figuratively talk roma thermod into voting for civil rights before he died. i

thought, well, maybe there is a real progress but hate never dies. she's just hiding, she's hiding the fact is, explain, yes, yes, the fact is that the biden was at the time of signing the law in 1964, 21 before his first election to congress was eight more years, because i liked the attitude to science. yes, yes, davic. i'm talking about the fact that the biden family was known to another roma yes, and by the way, i do not

agree with this law. but as we remember , she liked carrot cutlets. no, this is already another, as for another such moment. because tolstoy ate, carrot cutlets for nothing tried to find industrialization my first word, and this is industrialization , so there was, and the third word catalanta recognizes everyone’s last name jewry, as for the imperial, what is it called, there is an imperial trauma or an imperial imperial there is an imperial habit something then this is what it is like in russia, but it would be a problem with him, you know that in these accusations it’s not that they are unfounded, something else can be blamed, anyone, of course, an artificial construction. freemasonic birth trauma

the founding fathers, which sprouted its poisonous shoots through the uh bloody civil war and almost lost. this means that the second war for independence, as well as the knowledge that saved america in 1814, the russian empire does not give the anglo-saxons. and then think whatever happens. the main thing is what anglo-saxons are anglo-saxons. well , these ones like this would be good, which means that at the same time it is clear that here in my opinion. here i understand. everything, this is in my opinion from the point of view, so to speak, there international relations, in addition to relations with our brix partners there, building this bloc. here it is necessary, of course, to understand that any american internal conflict. this is not a conflict that will distract them from external content. just

the opposite, the action of people becomes the most. son, i remind you that the first american called by the american to a global conflict was the war for independence. that is, you are afraid there , and even in the indian ocean. that is, something like the number of powers that managed to draw this business along with other anglo-saxons. when who then fought against them it was. this is the war of 812-14. they seemed to have joined the world war, nevertheless they called a certain kind of creative by the way, so far it was the only one, so to speak, and the conflict of some alliances, the americans were formally on the other side. so, well, that is, they fought against england. and we , as it were, were allied with britain against napoleon, so that all subsequent civil wars in the united states were, that was not a global conflict, as if it was then, when the americans still tried that there was such a civil war , they tried to play the monroe doctrine, they defended the monroe doctrine from the southerners, and in this sense, they then tried to be

a nation-state country tuned to internal development, so to speak. thereafter hemmed in by the subsequent protectionist era made them the number one economy by the very end of the nineteenth century. and now when they consider themselves to be global powers, but we were told here the word global every every every paragraph. right now, when they are global powers and their internal conflicts, we need to prepare, as it were , we need to prepare for this. we need to urgently consider all the risks now. an interesting, perhaps, such a discussion in america is whether or not the americans should use nuclear weapons against their enemies. no, of course not, well, there was such a discussion, when mark miles tried to make a great man out of himself in all seriousness. every time i say that it would be necessary, everyone says it is necessary. what are you, how can you yes? we why do we have, of course? well, no, i am also against it right now, but in the sense that weapons are needed in order to use them against enemies, of course, weapons are needed in order to use them

well. it seems to me a very interesting topic about the significance of academic science. we have, uh, wide sections of the population. well, in general, an ordinary citizen. something far away somewhere they are sitting there somewhere doing their own business, as if it doesn’t affect anything such that it’s like artists like that, it means all in themselves in fact, and these are very influential strategic elements of any state. and so, when i say that guitar playing and correct chinese is the average possession of i weapons that what we have now built by the way, unfortunately, without sinology, vladimir vladimirovich himself apparently, like iosif sergeevich, he was a natural sinologist. and intuitively, what he built from china helps us now to act quite effectively on the western borders. and in general , it is globally necessary, because personal merit cannot be denied in any way, it is hardly possible here to somehow reveal an element, then this is the academic science that should have advised, but if you look at

what happened after february 24, 2012. unexpectedly, one of them left for germany in berlin , the leading chinese, who spoke on federal channels, and so on. so, i headed a certain anti-russian structure there, i won’t say it by my last name and it doesn’t matter everywhere. well, this is in the telegram channel in detail, which means that i will state everything so that i don’t waste time now, so that it’s faster, which means i'll tell you and so on and so forth, and now, as far as egoism is concerned, i'm exactly the same when i listened to you the same thing that i can say about academic hmm american tells about academic guitar playing. what about this particular person? i looked at his biography, it is important who speaks? yes , and not only what to say, well, the person was , uh, received a historical, which means the historical faculty of the pskov. eh, some kind of pskov history teacher of the school of history, did not bode well. trouble is no director of the whole institute of the russian academy of sciences, then graduate school. e in the duke.

this is known in st. petersburg, which means that the herzen pedagogical university is also, it seems, how far away it is . all sorts of american structures later . unexpectedly, it means that it receives an invitation for a full-breed internship at the state department, along the line of the state department. after that, a rapid explosion begins. it's just 5 minutes. i got acquainted. it means that moscow is farther away, it means more and more and it already means, uh, the director of an entire institute, which is really the russian academy of sciences. so we think that scientists do not needed, but the executive power is a legislative judicial official. he does not rely on his thoughts, he relies. well , of course, he has experience, there and so on such a number, well, it relies on the expert opinion of serious academic circles. everywhere there are memos closed, not closed, and so on. no one is likely to argue. and here is the strategic institution, which was supposed to give an answer based on the results of the us elections on military issues, and so on, it is headed by a person. i don't want to offend anyone, no duke.

so, because of which i know, i have many graduates with excellent teachers and educators, and so on, so, uh, and dreams in an ambulance with a history teacher leads the institute after he received some, so, uh, they also initiated there for so that's the word. here would be a full of these, probably, what do you say that they are, it means they were bubbling and so on mumbling. that's what is liberal. i think half of it is just that they still i think and fed information to their friends in the state department. well, it's obvious, so what is it? pskov here. for some reason, this whole one is some kind of liberal cells, well, liberal in quotation marks. why is it so, it turns out that on the borders of nato countries pskov borders with estonia in murmansk there are some borders with norway and so on. why? here there suddenly this one here, well, that's normal. at the center of the system. again, i don’t want to have anything in pskov. well, that is, here is a man-corporated in this system, and today he is there all of a sudden there. right

right. this is what the executive branch of the bodies, which are also designated as part of the executive system of the executive power, which they also receive, but they have their own systems of collective information, but all the same, these same institutions are direct things that are incorporated in this story, therefore, well, what they are, it seems to me, is important signal this, that i don’t call for anything, but, most likely, other institutes also have this about, uh, the institute. there herzen means and not just because it was academics in china's stylistic environment, who, for some reason, also graduated. it's clear that we don't really need anything right there right now in a relationship. specifically, the author of the article is not called upon, but it would be good to revise the academic circles. and they are generally needed in that one, in which there is a feeling that sometimes it is easier to recreate something, that this is an outdated

organizational one. tours are much more reminiscent of the structures of the holder of wonderful mansions in the center of moscow than really scientific institutions are able to generate and issue accurate references of the language taken off. but he has a phd. what is the discovery? i mean, it's very hard to find really scientists. well maybe he there, within the framework of some historical studios and teaching at school there, perhaps they have already noticed him in order to submit it on the folber and so on. maybe he was there in some way, well, conditionally, he was somehow agitated for some things of his own, and so on. that is, it is difficult to find someone there who actually produced scientific knowledge. i don't want to offend everyone. under one comb. there are really serious researchers who are passionate about their work, but the state is such that there really is a question. maybe create some new structures, maybe establish something. and now, well, it is clear that if there is science there at the academy, uh, you can already hear it there for several years conditionally, right? but

it is obvious that something needs to be done , some decisions must be made, because these people they will apparently be on some command. having felt something, we somehow come out with such articles and excite the minds. and as for russia, but russia has been and will be great. and this is the largest country in europe in terms of territory, population, scientific potential, and so on. we took twice they took berlin once, peter uh, paris thrice thrice, so, uh, and so on and so forth. , respectively, military alliances. here brix is it necessary well, the g20 is not a military alliance, and the big seven is also not a war. there is an alliance, a wonderful military alliance, the csto needs to do something with it. it is necessary to develop somehow and there is a feeling that contacts are on a level. beijing, moscow also leads the csto. and now it will mean that belarus has invited the exercises there.

we are observers india china and so on please. why create new structures there are already existing structures on some new grounds. it is possible to regulate the important moments and the important political event that this forum in beijing of the belt and road is coming. uh, peskov did not set the date, let's say he keeps a certain secret, really. the decision has already been made, there are already working groups, respectively, and, most likely, the visit will take place towards the end of october , i will not name the exact dates, but there will be not only a visit vladimir vladimirovich will have a lot of friends. uh, beijing allies and so on for china or with children - this is a major political event . let me remind you that the previous visit of edinpean to moscow. he was the first in general after the pandemic after taking office, and he brought a lot of results. and i think that an important contribution was made, among other things, by the fact that we very effectively resisted the counter- offensive. including they are the most important,

but not unimportant. yes, that is one. the main contribution of some kind here is the same visit. most likely, it will be very important from the point of view of shaping what will happen in the taiwan direction, how ukrainian history will be decided. and so i think that these dates are conditional. i will give an inaccurate date, 21, for example, october, which means that by this moment there will be a lot of different drillings, respectively, and negative ones against china, and so on. that is, do not be surprised that there is some kind of informational provocation here, because something very interesting and large is actually being prepared for the residents. for this key event. just like mef in the early years. this means that this forum was not held in the twenty-first year , and for some reason this year is not in may. he passed. here it is scheduled for october. that is, there must be some connections, and we are leaving, respectively. after this forum, all the entire globe is preparing for the us presidential election, that is, there will already be formed a certain disposition in order to further resolve some issues, too . what, there, may change

and in ukrainian. and so on. that is, here i am i think that this should be put in my head to keep it interesting, of course , so i join vladimir dol'fovich in your congratulations and numerous words of gratitude, wishes of all the best to our national leader president of the republic of belarus alexander grigorievich lukashenko i know that the president does not like it when too a lot of attention and in the individual. i would still focus. i use this case on the phenomena associated with it for the russian society for our civilization. here alexander lukashenko, he certainly belarusian but he is aware of himself and russian. he spoke about this many times by belonging to this great civilization and soviet belarusian. soviet i remember well, i went to a soviet school and began to learn russian , belarusian. i didn't have any contradictions there was no language problem in the morning we turned on the radio it was the belarusian regional newspaper, the belarusian

television was the belarusian was the central tv there were no contradictions. i lived in the belarusian soviet socialist republic which was born as our president. i i understood that this is my republic, it is part of the great soviet union, which i was proud of as a citizen of this country. and it's all. naturally. for many years they tried to say to us: no, ukrainian is contrary to the soviet, so, uh, ukrainians are fighting for the name. russia, but they themselves contradict everything connected with this name, vladimir the holy is not yours, he is our yaroslav, not your wise, he is ours, but all their policies are aimed at collecting the land to strengthen the state of the unity of the church. everything goes under the knife, everything that they spent everything on zeros. and it is conscious policy. after all, look how in all the republics, as if from one center , some kind of myths and stereotypes were implanted. yes,

it is necessary to speak not in ukraine, ukraine is necessary. that's not e belarus belarus is necessary there. ta lynn that's it, just like that , it's not smart to arrange these small letters, almaty is so ad infinitum. i want to give these examples just like a carbon copy and a number of other points. and we often succumb to this. we argue and prove. why argue here, using the example of alexander lukashenko, he understands what comes from life from life. here you have to look like on earth. and this is it for us. natural perception of self. here is the first russian census since 1897. russians are great russians, little russians are belarusians. this is what it says, this is the imperial consciousness. what is the imperial recognition that there is a people consisting of some kind of separate components or the soviet one, i know they tell us that it was a wild empire that suppressed everything nationally. yes , they presented, they are 80% of the schools in belarus in the belarusian language normally. and these examples

could go on and on. i'm not talking about national construction in other republics. this is part of the nature of our civilization, and we should be proud of it, the second moment is alliance, we constantly say in belarus the only ally of russia. although here, i am here in moscow at the thirty-sixth moscow international fair. i wonder what people say, you know, here you go, uh, different assessments, and then two women say, well, who are our allies? where is it possible? if anything, go says, well, china - says - yes, china immediately supported us turkey says. well, türkiye somehow not this way. well, in general, too, that is, people argue who the allies are. look at the stereotypes that were imposed on us in relation to the ussr's alliance in these academic institutions. so love our school so come from the elite. what are the healers? now the books are coming out. you read the history of eastern europe after the second world war, what to whom the soviet union knitted personalities there, what kind of comedians the frame was, after all

, read the biographies of jaruzelsky, who could call a hundred. quit. yes, these were complex allies ; complex allies; them. i had to be able to negotiate. the west was barely de gole, and brandt barely survived even then, uh, organizing provocations against them, everyone is one size fits all there. so they grew these mokrons of scholz. that's where the satellites of the soviet union had allies and, well, you see, vitaliytovich. he's on that impulse. he did not trust the allies, so vitaly's comrades destroyed him. and the warsaw pact. and , uh, i just went to school. and you were already of military age, at least, that is, you could take machine guns to go defend, kdr you didn't. and how much finance did i say here that you need to ask e dreams to the government of the frg what they did with the anti-fascist republic of the gtr. she in the constitution was fascist they or the soviet union, including says that we are all. further,

whom we have not betrayed. but this is if let's say directly at least one country that we have not betrayed, if not. well, because it's some kind of he feels the guilt of his generation for the unrealized chances of his generation's wine for those delusions that were objectively characteristic of the eighties. you applauded gorbachev correctly when he came to power, how simply rejoiced that a living person appeared. well, it was objective. i'm not saying that you were objectively preparing alcohol, well, we have to comprehend. this is where elena georgievna began about in the history of the balkan wars. we must also painfully comprehend our mistakes, how we succumbed to those patterns that where this director of the institute grew from, which

we have now all signed a recommendation in the american state, because your criticism here is the best recommendation to him. how can we suppose? where did he get it from? well, because these are stereotypical thinking. it doesn't last. even one generation has formed. it was self-perception. absolutely right in the sixties, i almost feel guilty before these countries of eastern europe if we don’t honestly talk about ourselves, where did yeltsin come from where did gorbachev come from where did yakovlev come from where did it come from yes yes it even came from, i can listen to the list, but why belarusians there were fewer soviet socialist republics, but closer to you than to us, of course, the most mature current alliance between russia and belarus is not such a direct, not direct succession. we are creating a new unique model, opposing the european union

, opposing nato is not always convenient. we have had conflicts over the past two decades, we all remember the different assessments that were given, and each time our opponents tried to catch on, knock him over, plant these old patterns and spices. the military operation , what is its significance is that we saw a genuine the essence of what happens is the knowledge of the significance of man. how does a politician differ from a statesman by responsibility, fidelity, understanding of the essence of a development strategy, but i have my question, which i will not answer. here we are, as it were, gathered here to answer all the questions. here i have one that is serious. the question is, there is a model of relations between russia and belarus . you can transfer it to other republics and the country does not, you categorically want to ask why, because there is no lukashenka's role personality plays a role significantly, but there are

some objective reasons. here vitaly comrade correctly asked the question. why is it worth it? by the way, are you sure you don't? uh-huh, i just think that yes, we need to determine what the essence of this model is. because, in principle , relations between russia and belarus are built very difficult to build for many years. yes, but a fundamental difference from others. this is not only the level of trust between the leaders, but it is the careful observance of the national interests of each of the participants in this union, which is why there is, of course, that is, therefore, these principles that are now developing mechanisms for implementation through the work of intergovernmental commissions. yes, the tool itself is a tool, but here respect and understanding of the strengths and weaknesses and the strengthening of each ally from this is a new type

of education, therefore, just the principles, it is clear therefore, i think that with these approaches it is just possible to build and at the same time they will go , a little faster should here. this is also an important story. there are templates for what is now called the buzzword adria. that is, it is a flexible structure. a you will have time to answer that question, also important, which vitaly petrovich raised. why is the kiev regime worth fascism fascism? of course, here we take georgy dimitrov with his definition of fascism, you know, here's another template. and you are using these nazism incorrectly - this is one fascism. this other franco is not fascism. he is a nationalist, and pinochet is not fascism. these are all, really. this is the justification of fascism life. we revere hitler, he clearly saw, uh, the genetics of this genetics and the connections in these right radical movements, which in soviet traditions are united by the word fascism. and dimitrov gave an amazing definition of fascism - these are open terrorists.

the dictatorship of the most reactionary chauvinistic, e.g., forces of finance capital is not a supra-class dictatorship, not a dictatorship of the lumpen proletariat of the lumpen yes, of the proletariat and the petty bourgeoisie over finance capital, but of finance capital and fascism always gives a short-term, but unique effect. why is he so attractive this evil is attractive for 10-15-20 years. it can make a splash, look how hitler built it. how many military factories are the first successes of the same garbage collector, doping is doping, absolutely doping, which destroys the state organism, but can have such an effect, and what is this one? well, you want too. name the phenomenon of the kiev regime that the interests of financial capital, which we call the oligarchy, converged with transnational corporations and they used the most evil dark forces of their people. warmed them up , in fact, brought them to power and in order to suppress. possible resentment of their dictations

, all those negative points are inherent ukrainian statehood in the 90s, they are correct, but financial capital understood the threat of the growth of these protest moods and therefore the fascistization of society took place, which made it possible to form this frenzied mass that can be safely thrown into the furnace of war. this is terrible and we will have to look for options along with positive answers to questions about russian belarusian cooperation by transferring the model. here we have proclaimed the principle of denozification as the principles of the tools of the model. well, the result we know what we are we are waiting, the main thing is to entrust the academic institute to me vitaly comrade. someone said one sentence. i think so. yesterday i watched my speech about the constitution no, it's not very important, he said about the anti-fascist constitution for years. it's not too much, then

few people said that this is exactly what the list yesterday was about, what you didn't say before, that we accidentally don't, this is a really important point. it was me yesterday from the second moment, which is also yesterday's transfer about the fact that there is no need to hurry. the west will not rot or collapse. giving up of the soviet past, it was necessary to fill this gap with something. bandera existed ; after the war, he was gradually approved by him 10 identical ones, whose children were zombified at school for 14 years.

this is so translated as a murder with meaning, so far i have not understood the political nature of russia for russia, the national is encouraged by europe yes, because it is a product of europe

i still want to return, although i am not an academician, but i want to return, as a very important point for academic issues. so when i read this article, i had the feeling that i hear a speaker at the funeral of some great man. and here it is said, here is something like that. here, as if

here is such an obituary.