the permanent five one have on breaks and general and you and russiablotrations in particle and after titov the influence was united will be moved to dobrik with a family name, and de emeralds. last yoring, and bikin us bovan trade patmash is a growingsessual. and what kind of stubborn ask from daew? national cops, and at the icons

of the sauna safari safari through vera bright end stands ua center and ingimon new avenue in relation to good afternoon, dear sergey viktorovich thank you very much for your speeches. my name is alexander gorodenko first year mgims faculty of international business. i would like to ask you this question. russia has been under western sanctions for several years now, how do our countries cope with this and what foreign partners are helping. thank you very much for this topic today , we need to cope with this, relying only on ourselves, those who

lament over. the collapse of our relations with western colleagues to the fact that everything will someday return to normal, they are built on sand. the line of the west is the course that was proclaimed with the aim of inflicting a strategic defeat on russia. and it will not disappear anywhere in the foreseeable future, and we understand this very well, and in any case, even. if suddenly, and by some incomprehensible edict from above, the west will offer us to return to more or less normal contacts. we will already think about whether we should do it. and if so, in what areas will we not cooperate with the west in those areas, and which depend on our security in every sense and military-political security, economic technological and so on. this e has already been proven by the experience of the last thirty

for years, the west does not hesitate at the moment when it wants to hold back your own development, and it is precisely in this that the goal of holding back the development of competitors will be abused. and all those agreements that were reached, none of the agreements in principle that were concluded with the west. and after the ninety-first year, and not a single one was completed, so here and take a word. uh , you can’t, but you can’t trust those signatures that you easily put on numerous documents. here are the difficulties to be overcome. of course, they are obvious and no one can argue with this, they are significant and they will continue to get worse. as far as can be judged from the statistics, well, the government under the leadership of the president, uh, who regularly hold meetings on various sectoral

issues related to the economic development of the country, but is doing everything possible and these efforts, uh, are giving a positive result. we have reduced unemployment. we do not have a shortage of goods. and in general, we expect quite decent economic growth, and given the circumstances in which we 're delivering this growth, and uh, we're seeing new projects coming up in the area of ​​transport investment. and moreover, projects that will tie us more closely with those countries in decency and negotiability, which we have no doubts about. it is above all our east south neighbors, a contract of ability and decency. we have already convinced ourselves of the west more than once and our conclusion is unambiguous, when they want to , we will look and decide. is it worth it and

if so, in what areas and in what volume, and plans and specific figures for the development of cooperation with the people's republic of china with india with the united arab emirates with iran saudi arabia now. just afraid to offend anyone, not to list a lot of african countries, especially the north african strange these plans. eh, concrete they are realistic, and they are already giving a result that is impressive in terms of increasing the turnover of goods, increasing the volume of investments and contacts in other areas, including cultural humanitarian sports ties. and what is being done with the international the olympic committee. this is, in general, a mockery of common sense before the olympic charters. and the president is also on the topic. he said it still forces others to look. these are the forms of development of an independent , depoliticized, but competitive

and fair sport. it's like that, hmm , when you see the goal and achieve it, you always get success and it teaches you exactly this approach in life. hello sergey viktorovich my name is voronin mikhail i am a first-year student of the international faculty of law. oh my question will be about middle east not so long ago in may of this year a quadripartite meeting of the foreign ministers of turkey, russia, iran and syria on the issue of resolving turkish syrian relations was held in june this year. russia has proposed a roadmap for the normalization of relations between the two countries. sergei viktorovich what do you think? what are the prospects for the restoration of diplomatic

relations between turkey and syria and, uh, is it real, uh, at this moment in the near future, u reach an agreement on a consensus on u ceasing the presence of turkish troops in territory of the syrian arab republic thank you is the process. e process normalization process, and between turkey and syria. it started last year, and both sides expressed a desire to establish contacts, and it was decided to start these contacts with u meetings, through the ministry of defense and e special services. they took place in december last year, and initially it was conditional that it would be. preparing the meeting, and through the ministry of foreign affairs with an eye to the preparation of the summit, and participated in the technical processes. e, türkiye syria and russia a,

considering that the iranian side is actively participating as a member of the astana format troika on the syrian settlement together with us from the turks. and the iranians also expressed interest in joining the format, which is involved in creating conditions for the normalization of relations between damascus and tehran already in the spring. e in april. uh, there was a meeting at the level of deputy ministers of foreign affairs already in the format of four, which was prepared by the meeting of the mysts of foreign affairs, and the four countries that took place in moscow where we e accepted a statement. having expressed our interest in developing a roadmap for normalization between syria and turkey, we handed over the draft roadmap to all our colleagues around june a couple of months ago. now it is under

consideration, contacts are ongoing to bring it to a generally acceptable state. when this project could be approved, and the difficulties of yours were mentioned in the presence of turkish troops in the north of the syrian arab republic, this is a fact, but i note, firstly, that in all documents, and the ostanin troika, which, after each meeting, accepts local statements, and says that all of us, including iranians , turkey and russians. naturally, we respect the sovereignty of the territorial integrity of the syrian arab republic and, uh, we oppose any attempts to stimulate separatist tendencies in turkey, all the time they sign under these documents , it’s another matter that the turks in their presence explain the persistence of the terrorist threat in northern syria and in this regard, uh believe that their stay, there is the stay of their military

contingent solves precisely the problem of preventing the overflow of the terrorist threat from syria to the south of the turkish republic. we have been dealing with this issue for a long time, and even before these consultations began in the format we mentioned, uh, we were in informal contacts. it was proposed to return to the philosophy of uh 1998, when the adam agreement was signed, this place from dan by this name it is mentioned, which is between turkey and syria and this agreement assumed that there is a terrorist threat in order for this turkey will have the right to stop the terrorist threat in agreement with damascus, and send its anti-terrorist structures to a certain depth of syrian

territory, in other words. uh, yes, the agreement continues to operate , no one financed it, and we think that this fila is logic. there, of course, it is necessary to agree on the depth of such operations, perhaps, what procedure for their start and completion, but the ideological base itself, so to speak, it exists and and this is agreed by all participants in the process, which we are mentioning russia and syria and turkey iran a and another reason that cannot be ignored when we talk about this topic is, uh, the illegal activities of the united states in the north -east of syria, because it is the united states that is decisively fueling separatism, and radical kurdish organizations, which are actually designated by the turks as a threat to

their security, therefore these processes are connected, and the united states they have occupied a significant part of the northeast in the syrian-arab republic, and these are the most important oil-bearing regions for grain production, that is, the energy food security of an independent state of un members. it has been directly undermined for many years by the united states, which export oil from there through iraq. and the proceeds are spent on the improvement of these territories on which they encourage the creation of a quasi-state. e kurds. moreover, they have already captured not only the traditional-historical lands of the kurds, but also part of the territory where they have always lived arab tribes. so this is a very dangerous time bomb situation. especially considering that the remote kurdish issue is relevant not only for syria, turkey, but also for iran and other countries as well.

uh, we constantly call on all our partners who maintain channels of dialogue with the united states to pay attention to this, by the way, for this part of syria that the united states has occupied, they have made an exception to the sanctions regime, that is, they are already considering this one of their own. occupation zone as independent states and i'm sure that our arab friends. they see this very well , they perfectly understand the risks and threats that are here, which are associated with this, and i very much hope that in contacts between the league of arab states. uh, the gulf cooperation council with their western counterparts does not forget this topic. good afternoon, dear sergey

viktorovich , my name is sofya novikova from yugra, the capital of the khanty-mansiysk autonomous okrug where more than half of russian oil is produced, first of all , of course, i would like to thank you for such an attitude towards the students of mgimoz, a very important and interesting heritage for everyone, and for the opportunity to ask you a question. and today we see how issues of energy geopolitics are diplomacy. the issues of energy supplies are becoming more and more important for our country. so it is for everything, and the world community in this regard. i would like to ask you a question lately russia uh, is restructuring the energy supply routes of kazakhstan, having free capacities for the transit of russian gas to the countries of central asia , including uzbekistan, may be a way to

expand exports to the east. please tell me if there are prospects for the development of cooperation in the gas sector with kazakhstan for further development of exports to asian countries if yes, what kind of close dialogue do we have with kazakhstan and with many of our other allies, and, uh, joint projects in this area. uh, and as for uzbekistan, uzbekistan has a deficit, and natural gas and uh, we're negotiating. now, already at the level of presidents, there have been a number of contacts between the presidents of russia and kazakhstan and uzbekistan that the transit system from kazakhstan should be used to meet the needs of uzbekistan, this will require some technical work on the ground, but this is quite feasible. and it won't take long, by the way. you

know, when they talk about energy policy, they often mention, uh, the problem of gasification. eh, the most gas-producing country in our country, far from everything has yet been decided in this area. as you know, but there are corresponding plans in kazakhstan, the problem of gasification is also serious. in the north, in the east, it is quite serious, therefore, with the development of further cooperation in coordinating plans. all. this is certainly taken into account in full, because the eurasian economic union is the closest neighbors of the jewish economic union, it is a priority and , of course, we have it, and we have our own transport systems for gas exports to the people's republic of china and we do not create problems for anyone, because china's needs they uh are such that no one will be left behind, no one will be out of the game, not kazakhstan

turkmenistan is not some other country, so here uh, that's within. cooperation between russia and central asia in the energy sector is fully understood and there is a whole series of specific projects that are very promising and will ensure the stability of our economies. incident of the first-year faculty of the institute of international trade sustainable development weakly ask questions at the moscow conferences on international security. you mentioned the process of becoming a more equitable and sustainable world order, as well as the gradual de-larization of the world economy and trade. how long it may take for these trends to spread around the world, and also what can prevent this. well, this is probably a question for, uh, even a doctoral dissertation, because

it is impossible to predict these processes. it is not the rotation of the earth that is subject to legitimate astronomy and not other processes in the field of exact sciences, much depends on the role personalities in history. there is a certain personality in the head of the state, bright gray. e, and now you observe, in my opinion, daily in television and internet reports, how many individuals who lead this or that state make decisions that are aimed exclusively at, e, perpetuating their own as they consider dominance here, but there are individuals who understand the need to unite efforts that understand what is. a large number of risks and threats for all mankind and the co-owner of these risk threats can only be jointly developing such methods. overcoming them,

which will be in the interests of everyone, no matter what happens, as with this green transition that has been announced. in the european union, the main task of the day was to reduce all investments in hydrocarbon production, and they even began to abandon nuclear energy, then the wind blew not so, the tides were not very strong. the sun shone little. and so, it means that now they are being disentangled, and moreover, they are forcing the countries of africa and other stations to return, especially africa, accelerated to switch to this green economy still and still. although they themselves have long been consuming coal. uh, exceeded all hmm previous and previous indicators , african countries in response to this remind, what is good it is necessary to do something with the climate, of course, and take into account these changes, although nothing has been proven 100%, but they remind.

if you want us to do green transition now, let's go back to the promise that was made about eight years ago, i think at one of the conferences, when the west signed a commitment to allocate 100 billion dollars a year to help developing countries, and nothing has been done in the implementation of the green transition. by the way, when we met now within the framework of brix e, many colleagues recalled this and compared these promises of 10 billion dollars annually, and compared those that were simply forgotten with the figures that characterize the assistance of the west to ukraine over the past year and a half. well, i think everyone understands what is at stake. so, now in western countries they are gradually heard not very loudly, but they are more and more sober voices that call for compromises and say agreements that will take into account the interests and everything or security. in

the sphere of economy of all states, without exception, to abandon this dictate, which no one has ever led to anything good in their lives. so they start talking. we will support ukraine as long as it takes, and we are also on the e, these brix themselves discussed this with colleagues in an informal setting, and they asked me. and how long do you think they will need to defend ukraine and so that she wins the night on battlefield? i say, well, i can’t guess, but there are examples in history. look. how long did it take them in iraq how long did it take them in afghanistan to achieve their goals? i think the answer here is clear, therefore, to build a foreign policy on the basis of false data, and such aggressive ones. and this is the way to nowhere. or rather, how nowhere is the way for warriors, which we are actually now observing in various regions of the world, but the process, as i said, we will not

stop the process e a little higher. and this is an objective course of history, how long will it last? it's hard to say here thought that the era of domination. the west will be eternal, it lasted about 500 years, but it is coming to an end, so this process it has a very deep historical roots in terms of. the old thinking, and now it simply reflects objective reality, but from the point of view of the fact that new centers of power have appeared that no longer want, uh, to play the role of an object of international cooperation, they don’t want to be applied to the old principle of the colonialists to live at the expense of others. thank you look in africa for example, uh more and more relevant the question arises of processing those

natural resources with which it has been gifted by god and nature, and loud voices were heard at the russia africa summit now on these brix themselves that africa no longer wants to simply supply e-mineral raw materials, but which will be processed somewhere in europe in other western countries, and then all the profits, all added and the cost will be to the benefit of the non- fricans. here we will contribute to these processes, but i repeat once again, it cannot be ruled out. e that somewhere someone will come to authorities. e with intentions that do not at all correspond to historical trends. thank you very much for the answer. there is probably an opportunity for another skevich for two. and how much now? here are the three questions. come on then we have here three questions and three questions of perfection. i thank you for such

an interesting thing is the opportunity to ask you questions. my name is volosova. maria i am a student of policy management at the odintsovo campus. and so i would like to know recently in saudi arabia they themselves took place on the settlement of the ukrainian crisis, in your opinion. why did the participants meet, that they demonstrated the results themselves, and that this russia. this is a good question, very relevant and it reflects just one of the aspects of what we are talking about when we mention attempts. the west opposes fair regulation in every possible way and generally problematic devices and individual conflict situations for the first time. and zelensky's plan of ten points, which they call the formulas of peace, was presented

to the international community last year. the west immediately supported him, the plan consists of ten points, among which e russia is removed in the border of the ninety-first year, and russia pays reparations to ukraine a-a. the russian leadership is going to the tribunal for uh, trial and uh , some other things that are related to this, and among these um, absolutely crazy and unrealistic and inadequate points , it is written that energy security should be strengthened. need to consume food security. we need to strengthen humanitarian ties. and here are all 10 items packed. e. as they say in english, apples and oranges, uh, in one , even there are not apples, not oranges, but completely

different products, and they are packaged in this zelensky formula, which the west proclaimed the only basis for resolving the ukrainian crisis. well, few people took it seriously, but the obsession of the west, uh, the desire to keep us from defeating us, manifested itself in the fact that this absolutely inadequate paper became part of the official position, which the west begins to promote with absolutely such thimble methods. invited there countries of the seven. some brix countries ukraine itself.

naturally, our brix colleagues who took part there began to discuss ways to fulfill zelensky’s formula to us, then they said that they were just listening and there were no proposals to take any further steps and no there were no practical decisions on how this formula would be implemented either, and our saudi friends later. we were told that they want to host another meeting. in this format. they said that this is done solely in order to convey to the western participants to ukraine itself the idea of ​​the complete futility of any discussions without the participation of the russian federation, which they did at that event, which took place in the jida, but, but our western colleagues did not

calm down on this, and uh, we got word that there was an online meeting on the seventeenth of august. not according to the whole formula of zelensky, but several online meetings on each of the ten points of this form, that is, the one-move is absolutely elementary coaxed so good. you, we understand that you are against punishing russia, in order to condemn russia, in order to negotiate without russia, you don’t need to support these parts of the zelensky formula. but look at food security. take charge of this over this energy security paragraph. it is, of course, clean all over. this is understandable, and especially that it is already a matter of hindsight that he

should send his representatives to these meetings of the virtual working groups. and such representatives participated. i saw mister guterosh. in johannesburg, on the sidelines of the brix summit, i frankly told him that this violates all the principles of the work of the secretariat, because, according to the charter, the secretariat must be impartial and should not receive instructions from any government. and in this case, we know. which government addressed the secretary general, and on the appeal he sent his people, he began to explain that they were there solely as consultants, because they discussed profile issues with them about food energy and ecology, but i honestly told him and i don’t want to hide it, that besides the fact that the very fact of participation, in whatever capacity it

contradicts, e, the three duties of a psychotherapist, but when such an invitation took place we were in the direction of many aspects of what is happening, even this was not notified. and uh. this, in principle, confirms our longstanding fears, uh, which are based on the fact that the west wants to privatize the secret of the secretariat of international organizations. the west has an overwhelming personnel advantage. uh. in a sense, in these secretaries, either directly or through the provision of dual citizenship to representatives of other countries who got into the secret according to the quota of their homeland and then received a second citizenship. this is a serious process. he requires, uh, a separate discussion, we will this