and here i will simply sign my name, under what alexander mikhailovich said, they draw conclusions from everything that has happened over the past 3-4 years. and we and we draw conclusions from what

has happened over the past three or four years. we drew conclusions from the fact that we have not yet been able to launch full-fledged economic growth outside the military sectors of the economy. we drew conclusions from how quickly the americans began to close loopholes in parallel imports from the way they twist the arms of our partner. this is a big question. and if we are in a situation where our enemy is learning, including from his mistakes, including those failures that they have on the front line. now, if we don't study and don't study, sooner or later we will lose, but i can't help but say about beslan too. i

remember very well. these days the first first meeting of the club took place. valdai it was one i was. as a technical staff, but there were all sorts of different western people there. i will always remember how they did n't care. they were sitting when they started coming victim reports. they were sitting. it was a banquet. and if only we could then try to understand with whom and with what we are dealing, because in general everything that happened later and after the war of the three eights. and according to the coup in ukraine and the genocide of the people of donbass, the drowning

already began to emerge approximately there, but you know what’s amazing with us? ability and desire not to finish speaking. by the way, speaking about the third of august. eh, well, we all learned the formula at school. what is the victory of the soviet soviet people over german fascism and japanese militarism. we are here, we are the system that we defeated in japan called militarism. and yet i agree with this. it was fascism. it was nazism absolutely human hating it was racism. sometimes in much more terrible forms, who does not believe. let him go sometime to china of the nanjing shanghai massacre. this unit 731, i think, was called

a human hate experience. the system that was created in japan was not the system of eating sushi and sashimi. it was a system absolutely transcendent, pitch hateful person. which the americans, as it were, dismantled, but in reality they mothballed it for the future, when the americans come in handy. they are good at it. here we need to learn to negotiate to the end. we need to learn not to be silent about what we see and feel. well, the last thing i wanted to say, but you know, and here i am now looking at what is happening in europe well, yes, we are all right in saying that europe is the last anchor , such an anchor for

americans. because the auction isn't over. but we must not keep saying that europe itself wants to be a battering ram against russia, i understand the europeans. well, let's just imagine the americans leave the vaus to contain china, somehow the conflict over ukraine stops. well, who is europe completely degraded in the industrial social in the moral sense, the territory filled throughout the space already in poland is enclaves of migrants. in poland, there are few migrants there. be more like this the baltics already have it.

and we understand that for europe the state is so comfortable in general, the war with russia, the hybrid war with russia is salvation, europe realized the hybrid war with russia as salvation, because if it turns into europe, no one is that it is a former socially successful territory, a large social economic one, and the further, the more obvious it is to understand when we evaluate prospects. peaceful and settlement prospects for dialogue with our wonderful partners, we must understand that very many of those whom we used to consider our partners and believed that it would be easier to negotiate with them than with the americans. they have this

conflict conscious and appreciated as a tool for survival. this is it, in my opinion, until we fully realized the seriousness. lavrov just told e the price of negotiating words and signatures. this has already been proven by the experience of the last 30 years. the west does not hesitate any time it wants to, uh, hold back your own development. namely, this goal to restrain the development of competitors will be abused. e all those agreements that were reached, not one of the agreements in principle that were concluded with the west after the ninety-first year, and not a single one was fulfilled, therefore, here and take a word. uh, you can’t, but you can’t trust the signatures that forced us to numerous documents. such a good

start to a diplomatic dialogue, that is, yes, here, returning to ukraine after all, what is their offensive. in general, well, not just fizzling out. it has almost run out of steam. well, literally. well a couple of weeks when, uh, they realize that one of the ukrainian generals is another, or ternovsky, or something else, happily said that everyone had broken through the first line, the second third will be weaker. i look at the map. well, you haven’t reached the first line yet, and immediately bilds and everything else are immediately quoted in such a look, you know, look at these discussions, especially here are two kremlin cadets. and what are the confessors of the moscow district for? come on cheesy one is required, so to speak e

fully stand on the american point of view to concentrate the grouping to return to the origins of soviet military science and inflict e, determine the direction of the main attack, but it is clear there in the south and forward to melitopol, and the second one says no need to defend, after all, it’s kupyanskaya there, because kharkov is there, e, it’s impossible, but nevertheless. uh, the admission almost ran out of steam. although you know, if you read, uh, listen to analytical materials, what is the american and the europeans? well, it's just that the ukrainians are winning, they broke through the first line. already the second is really what you just said, here is a little more will appear now. uh, another miracle weapon of 10 abrams. and these 10 avros will crush, so to speak, the remnants of the russian defense. eh, so to speak. the losses

of the russian grouping are simply monstrous , uh, in comparison with the ukrainian ones, in general , ukraine has 10 times less there. well, in general , some kind of nonsense. and something is needed and so, last week, material appeared in the english press. well, the leak is such that the british intelligence transmitted e. zelensky assessment of the possible consequences of the assault on the zaporizhzhya npp this has already been voiced in a number of programs. well, i'll just repeat it, because it's true from my point of view. this is serious in this report, e zelensky convinces that all apocalyptic scenarios e possible, so to speak, environmental damage of revolutionary contamination of the area. they are all greatly exaggerated; the reactor zone is well

protected; they pay tribute, so to speak, to the soviet e- e. shock, and moreover, the rector is in a cold state, so the occurrence of an emergency situation is minimized. the only thing that poses a danger is the storage of nuclear fuel. well, first of all, it's out of the way. and secondly, yes, even with his defeat. uh, radioactive contamination anyway. and the terrain will be local. nothing terrible will happen, but there is some kind of part of the zaporozhye kherson region, so to speak, and then everything will be. uh, well, moreover, uh, the russian armed forces. it is unlikely that they will dare to use aviation for e defeat. e assault squads, which, so to speak, will capture this zaporozhye nuclear power plant a and so on. that is a report.

uh, provoking zelensky to make this decision, moreover, uh, it is also reported that nakhmelnitskaya with e was noticed, so to speak , assault squads led by instructors from the sas, who, uh, in general, train them given that khmelnitskaya, if she uh is close in its characteristics in terms of the number of reactors; there are two unfinished reactors. uh, it's such a comfortable place to practice. that is, i do not exclude what is it, by the way. the last thing that can be passed off as some kind of victory is the spring and summer offensive of the so-called ukrainian forces, so i think we need to be. uh, ready for it and i think our team you don't mean it. and uh, continuing the theme, uh, already related to nuclear weapons, and last week uh, magazines komi places published

an editorial. under this name , a new nuclear arms race is coming. it 's very interesting, because uh, there are three main ones coming up, uh, there are four, but three main reasons why? uh the new nuclear arms race will be larger and more dangerous, firstly, it will be trilateral, taking into account, so to speak, e factors, china how it started is also very remarkable for the first time. uh, when the western press writes that the americans provoked this with their withdrawal from the treaty, in truth. 2001 there are riac agreements. and after that, so to speak, the process began. the chinese factor, uh, the authors of this article note that, uh , china is rapidly increasing its nuclear potential and by about thirty by the fifth, but i heard estimates of their thirtieth year , china will already have 1,500 warheads, which

is generally comparable, uh, with our and uh american potential. e, the article also notes that from the eighty-sixth year to the present, in general, the number of warheads in the world has decreased from 70.000-400 to 12.5, that is, the reduction has been dragging, but very significant. but now we are on the verge of uh, the americans are beginning to think that they will have to resist. not just russia alone, but russia coupled with china. therefore, we urgently need to increase our nuclear potential here. uh, so to speak , begins the discourse about before loading. what is preload preload? this e placement on media platforms is optional. ah, warheads.

now, uh, this amount is limited by the cis treaty , which is still , despite the fact that the russian press has stopped its action , its participation in it. here, for example, on the trident platform, and place 16 or 12 there, depending on the power of warheads, only six can be 10 there i have no. maine instead of three one. that is, uh , americans count for 2 years. they can increase their e, so to speak, e on strategic carriers instead of 1550 to 3.750. russia also has such an opportunity, but you are less than 600 there with a little. and the third is the factor of new technologies, namely hypersound, which also worries the americans very much. and in their

opinion. something needs to be done urgently. uh, mobilize all efforts in order to neutralize the threat from russia, so to speak. i mean we we talk a lot about what steps there can be to ensure that we still bring our former partners to our senses with regard to nuclear weapons. well, we said there's resuming, uh, nuclear testing at novaya zemlya over there. turn off the monitoring system. but here, uh, again last week, the foreign ministry, uh, issued a statement about the relevance. e of the moscow declaration of the ninety-fourth year. they are for targeting. i want to remind you that in january 1994 , the united states and russia, uh, signed a declaration on zeroing flight missions strategic missiles in february is the same uh, the statement was signed with the uk itself. this, of course, well, from a military

point of view. it's completely meaningless meaningless stuff about nothing, because. well, what is it about non-targeting and about non-flying assignments, but i'll take the disk out of the computer and put it in the safe. so you need to reset the flight tasks and set them. there, i don’t know how many minutes and everything is, so to speak, in place, but, uh, from a political point of view. now, if you take and declare that russia is coming out of this, so to speak e from this statement from this declaration and regarding the united states regarding the disk back to take the disk back and put it in and that's it. and uh. i say my point of view. this, of course, the effect is not very strong, but it seems to me, from a political point of view from a propaganda point of view. this should, so to speak, e lead to some feelings of our e, former partners, that we are moving, so

to speak, that deterrence is really to e, or rather from such a neutral position to real nuclear deterrence, and someone calculated the environmental damage if he explodes this nuclear storage, how much more or less than the use of tactical nuclear weapons. e. well, here, uh, the westerners believe that , uh, there will be here no, well, tactical nuclear weapons , in addition to radioactive contamination of the area, there are all uh, the damaging factors of a nuclear explosion are present, but this, of course, is not the tsar bomb, but nevertheless. we, uh, the light emission of her shockwave. everything, that is, uh, destruction will be everything, and here we are talking only about the city of active objection of the terrain, which they consider to be local. i don’t know if they considered it, but it seems to me that tactical nuclear weapons will still be stronger. well, they say, practice is a criterion, well, yes, practice is a criterion, it

certainly is a way with a friend yes advertising.

something is happening in the kingdom. i understand that you are not from the academy of sciences. that is, i guess, but somehow. well, this is a big scandal. after the publication of an article by a certain yermchakov in a certain independent newspaper , it is interesting from whom she is independent. and with such a program article, i have only one question. we discussed it a lot on the air, well, where is the director of the us and canada institute, elected by the collective to the position of director, which is also such a burp of perestroika. he's so straight about russia. here, i'm just wondering, but here he is his institute. they also wrote certificates to the foreign ministry . do you know the structure of the authority? i'm not talking about style, but how a person with such a level of knowledge and understanding can write something, and command something else. it's illiterate respect for

pskov teachers and graduates of leningrad universities, but it's just there named after herzen yes, he ended up even simply illiterate. i, why don't you be offended, but they removed it. something like this, but he wrote , why did he somehow or he had already expressed something similar in his writings, well , i explain russia personally to me expansionism, but in vain what goes against the american course. they say that well, russia is a country. hmm , autocratic totalitarian there is something like that, yes , and that's why they sell myths to their people there. so he suddenly saw the light, because the financial audit of the activity began at the academic institute or maybe, well , they want to remove it. i'm just wondering, somehow, but he is one such academic science

from the nineties, who, please, give guarantees. allow me to fall in love with someone who has been studied in western countries and give guarantees, please, more. no, i'm just curious. you, as an experienced person with multiple training outside our homeland, tell us for sure, you own the definition methodology. outstanding scientists as an experienced person and who received another part education outside our homeland, i would say, so i understood the question to answer. i'll be on my own is not affected. still, it is called the evader answered. why i answered directly as margaret thatch studied, what is called so answers simply the fact that yes, the academy of sciences in its time, i will not generalize. i would not like to generalize, all the more so that the us institute

of canada is our external partner, but we work in different areas. so the academy of sciences had to survive in the nineties and later had to survive, they sat on grants. and grants if well , in fact, if you receive money from there, then to a certain extent you owe some part, at least their point of view was shared, because otherwise, you won’t pass the grant. we just recently. back abandoned uh western science metrics. forgive me, if any position is elected from me, in principle, i have to submit a certain set of indicators in my place. excuse me, it just elects everyone, of course, of course, they are elected everywhere. and wherein you need some kind of shackles you are his silences and everything else that the collective elects, when

which one enters who? well, at first it’s different for everyone, first the faculty of scientists, and then the scientists of the universities, and then it enters. i hope no no, only a professorial lecturer in administration who was brought up in the nineties the same one, that is, a dense squad. partisans are like that. well, they settled down. and the main choice is very democratic, very well done, i really really want from how much you published there in the west there, and with us in fact, what is our relationship to here is important, what is not there. well, of course, a real independent russian science, right now stands up to its full height and straightens its shoulders, like atlas. now this is changing. and most importantly, it’s not so scary here, but when we and the naturalists have such a situation that the situation is abra-la,

because the natural faculties, that is , the people who study physics and chemistry there, respectively, are not natural. no. no, we thought, i think we just don't like this division anymore to eat natural science is unnatural what they say with us, okay, this is what we talked about do you want? in fact, it shows the deepest systemic problem. yes, this is a very deep systemic problem , so it is no coincidence that, for example, when the need arose, here you are talking about on the right , these terrorist attacks occurred in washington, new york in september 2001. here is a group of droughts. the group of the city council created a number of other groups. there were very few representatives of academic science, which surprised me very much, because there would be recruited different people.

here are specialists from various fields, but there were not as many representatives as it would seem, what should be, and probably it was precisely about the fact that our state bodies understood very well what, well, firstly, uh, they left on the water and bread. this is with state funding, so the youth did not go there. and even now it is not very willing to go, i can say that graduates are mostly content.

canada would head no matter with my experience. yes, i do not, i do not argue, only there. well, okay, i even know that there will be a need to carry out repairs and everything else, because the academic institute is also in need now. here even in this plan in large financing. their roof is leaking. well, not in the literal sense, i would not say, here, with regard to problems with material support.