canada would not be headed by a question with my experience. i'm not arguing, just there. well, okay, i even say that there will be a need to carry out repairs and everything else, because the academic institutes are also in need now. even in this regard, you are a major financier. their roof leaked not in the literal sense, i would not say, but as for problems with material support , it exists and therefore you know when people

express their opinion, so to speak. well, here, well, no question. yes, if you claim it that you are a person at least from the position, i would say that it is difficult to present a scientific position in the general press. why are you writing? you are not writing a question for us. then sign just a computer sergeevich well, you are dragging all your titles there. well, here i, personally , their motives here will not be clear, i felt that something was starting to burn under the backside, therefore, it is urgent now that the statement of the state department should not be touched with a cry. you are a great representative of soviet academic science. we have been waiting for him for a long time

. here's a grant for him, here's for him, here's everything for him it’s clear what will happen next, and he will talk about it like all these years. he struggled terribly with the system of delivering edits that had nothing to do with shouting. i am your bourgeois. but here i say, there is a problem that exists in the russian federation, which you cannot solve this problem quickly. this is how finances are difficult to explain. what are they saying there, and then to demand clarification from them, there are also problems here, which it was systemic, it was laid back in the nineties. and for us in 1-2 years. here a special operation is not allowed. this is a problem. in principle, it must be solved, so to speak, with a complex approach , it must be created in essence, as in the soviet union, at one time, the transformation of the state created soviet science, and it is very serious sacrifices, including material ones, when scientists were sent abroad with to study for gold and so on, just because

tsarist russia was destroyed, the science of tsarist russia is the same. after the soviet union , we also experienced the same devastation. here now we can only we will not go anywhere for gold. i think that now we won’t have to, but no less, we can exchange them for gold. for some men, we can do some . for example, people from our state administration agree that we will give them their agents for gold. well, there is a contract. i know that you are so tough and in general such a person. here you are, poor corinne jean pierre yes, you keep kicking her, so to speak. how can you imagine a rakalson in her place? what kind of president is there then? she will sit if there is such a person, there was a gensaki before her, yes, the same russophists, because now you will not find political ones, they would skillfully hide it in the west

, others speak about it directly, but they do not like us. here it is necessary. so it is very strong to proceed from the fact that they have never loved us and will not love us. even if they fought, and together with us, as in the first and second world wars, they were with nicky, we fought against the same opponents, however, they did not fight with us even then. well, how is it considered that he had posters for the forty -second year from january 1? how the anti-hitler coalition was formed, at the beginning we had the northern convoy by the americans. if you are not, well, the northern convoy. in general, this one is also somewhat different, but so that the ground operation, so that there is general planning in 10 days. this was not what it is, if on march 18, 1818, they first landed there in the murmansk grs corps in the far east, supposedly to protect us from the germans.

maybe, this is it, well, in any case, now, if the current administration in the united states is in such a situation, we are completely satisfied with karine jean-pierre. it is simply a reflection, and when not only biden begins to freeze, it freezes constantly. here is michmak makonal, that is, the opposition hangs up. this is also an interesting thing. no, well, interesting. no, he just stops. he sinfully laughs at sick people; he sinfully torments sick people. why a person? yes it really does continue to work. here you are talking about the fact that you are a famous author. well there is part of the execution, quite real of this article about the fact that the united states is now a fairly powerful power and that the united states is fighting to preserve its world order. well this is deep. yes, we are

already in a cold war. so you say, we are entering a global conflict in the world, a global conflict began on the maidan when they launched a direct attack. so, then they started practically cold as he was the president against us on the maidan in ukraine. which one? there were two there in 1914, and i think earlier, because they broke the constitution of ukraine, they came up with a third round of choice, he said, then they had a slightly different strategy. and here, but this was the beginning of the cold war. they really broke the constitutional order in our soft underbelly. that is, you have not yet reached the violent method, but in essence. this was direct interference in internal affairs. well , you can say so, you can talk from snowdan and so on. well, i think that this is a direct attack mood. they started like once on the second maidan in 1914 and now this war. it's just expanding. it reaches new limits - it has become global, because china was included there

in the latest visit. gina raymonda is precisely a representative of that group in the american establishment who, in principle, would like to restore economic relations with china . here she is in the administration in the administration. er, biden is responsible for restoring these relations. well, in particular, boeing , for example, is selling planes again aircraft are supplied to china, this is partly the merit of this ministry, that’s why. well, she has achieved, in principle, as soon as she agrees on something. immediately, because of the united states, someone speaks up inside, it could be a representative of congress, a representative of another department , a white house press secretary, who immediately says that china is the main adversary, that is, in other words , there is no e in the united states. that part of the establishment or that part that would be in favor of resolving the relationship. and this goes by escalation, dominating everything.

i said to look for escalation against us, escalation against china and the confidence that ultimately on one of the two fronts, which is our fronts or we or someone will retreat. therefore , this kind of rhetoric means that yes. here we are winning , somewhere they broke through, they broke through something, because it is necessary initially they are up to the first. we didn't get anything. this is such a thing, you know, well , think of it as a military outpost. yes, yes, they are fighting during the combat period. they have not yet interrupted absolutely correctly in this sense and many military experts in the united states know this, and the same scott ritter knows this, uh, the mcgregors and so on, who talk about this, well, we need to convince everyone that we are not spending 20 million in vain. you are

20 billion. we we are still releasing 24 billion. it’s not in vain that we will carry out a program there next week for 250 or 350 million. we need to convince someone. this needs to be passed through congress, so there is a cold war. it's coming, it's going full speed ahead. we are fighting for a new world order. here's what now has passed uh, i mean the brix themselves . but this is a very important period. it’s like a transit, because on the ninth of the tenth we move to twenty. and so, uh, now there is such information that xi jingpii, most likely, will not go there. well, actually, why go there, because at the twenty , two groups have already clearly formed within the twenty. this is the seven, dominated by the united states, this is a fairly united group. they will have one declaration of this themselves, there is brix with those who joined have already expanded. this is

another group and a small group of those people , those, strangely, there i am at sea. maybe it's a little bold. in my opinion. twenty died, so that’s what i’m talking about, that now we are facing this period of transit, which quite clearly divides the world, but in the cold war it does not happen immediately, the cold system of the cold war. and the first - it became. in general, the korean war was what i know. an event that says the world is divided. that's why he died twenty? well, it was twenty, because the pure economic format was politicized, when they pulled out zelensky for some reason, when they arranged all this, when they tried to impose a political resolution, they said something strange. fuck you, don't respect formats at all. you don't understand what we're talking about. we are not solving problems for you that we planned to listen to this drug addict clown , for some reason the americans signed up for this. they began to put so much pressure that a serious

country said. yes, it’s not interesting that twenty twenty followed this path after their death from brisbin, of course, since 2014. i said that a full-scale cold war began there, these clones were not invited anywhere. and when you’re in the top twenty, well , it’s just crazy when you suddenly pull out zelensky, who has nothing to do with the top twenty. and what is it about, but don't call it twenty. well, i would say, so that on the twenty-twenty you are playing football in the other they say wait a minute, we have a horse. and the horse begins to run across the field. everyone says, that's how great the horse runs, well excellent football and the twenty economic serious questions suddenly zelensky’s clamor on the horse does not look like a twenty to this twenty. and by the way, they won’t let you in, of course, that they won’t

let you in simply because the word itself is broken and that’s why, when the leaders of china and russia don’t come, they’ll stab you. it's even broader here . what am i getting at? what am i saying? in principle, it’s not about anything insofar as, uh , the palace isn’t even about economic issues, because this structure and the wars that are being waged on all fronts. yes, it is going against us, a hot regional major regional conflict in ukraine against china, it is being waged as a trade war, because in 1818 it was a trade war, which, by the way, was started by the trumps, the republican administration and no one’s visits. while they cannot stop this war, nor reverse it nor restore relations, that is why the war has taken on a global character. we do not enter into it. we go into it as a scientist, and

you can see this abstract that you can roll back, maybe somewhere in russian, when you want to, as if a question was immediately addressed to andriano dolvich and me about why i published the publication. i think you, in principle, the main reasons today and immediately after the publication of the publication to identify there is another reason, this is andrianovich and dmitry gennadievich, who also does not work at the university they'll let you lie, you know, the academic intelligentsia. these are very , uh, special people and when such publications come out, if suddenly within a very short period of time there are no consequences, they immediately begin to draw conclusions that something has changed, which means it was published for a reason. it’s not for nothing that this person remains. this means that some changes have already begun, as soon as a very compelling reaction occurs, then we begin to cope. why did all this happen then, in short, didn’t he really know, or is it already starting to take effect? ​​hmm

, the version that you talked about, i generally agree with andrei anatolyevich. the only thing i want to disagree with is that it takes a lot of time to correct the system. i think that if desired hmm a very short one is enough period of time in order to finally restore order in this area. you just need people who didn’t build the system themselves to do this from those who have a vision of how to implement everything that our president talks about and very quickly it will be possible instead of disguising the old system as something something new to read and the headlines happen very quickly, it will be possible to introduce your own criteria and into goal setting some kind of our education, a keychain, which so far it. unfortunately deprived. i think that it will come to this. definitely regarding our topic directly, which we are discussing today. eh, i looked with interest

at the article in the military and found some interesting phrases there, firstly. it should be noted that, if the last year and a half of the western reader, sometimes our reader has tried very hard. uh, with such pressure to convince that the whole point of carrying out a special war operation in ukraine is evil in itself. that is, there is no meaning there. we are just so evil by nature and all of our leaders are some kind of mania and in general we are not thinking about anything else except as a nation, in order to include ourselves in the history textbooks, and there are no objective reasons, but what we offer to the world. this is generally a form of some kind of madness. now new expressions have appeared that the problem is that vladimir putin proposes a world order that is built on real post-colonialism

, offers a world order that is built on absolute multipolarity, these are their phrases and which protects conservative values, what is the problem? in my opinion. this is a huge advantage, not a problem, but now the dynamics themselves are changing and in russia ’s understanding of them there appears, uh, a very clear goal setting and a clear proposal for global peace for the global majority. how now such phrases appear, but i can’t ignore certain phrases , which, of course, still amaze and very much surprise, for example the phrase russia invaded syria on the side of the current president. a small question, if on the side of the current president russia invaded, what there you did then if what we did was invasion the second phrase russia is not a great power. however, it is not a regional power and carried away its own category. this is a regional power. with

worldwide influence. no, guys, if you seem to have global influence, you are a world power. there is a regional power. you don’t have it, and you know from the ratio of form and content to the filling of meaning, this resembles the phrase attributed to the jean-polyarter that let everyone choke in blood. who doubts our love of peace, for our mercy is merciless. in terms of their meaning, all these phrases are exactly the same, that is, it is a set of words that contradict themselves, but introduce some maximums in the minds of people who read all this. and i think that these are all very good signs, because they indicate that our opponents no longer have plans. the fuse ends with propaganda theses, thrown in as it progresses, including the us presidential campaign and awareness. i generally have no prospects for further confrontation with russia are gradually fading away, and they are forced to accept

the realities that are emerging, and it is very important that we understand all the time that our main rival here, our main competitor here is the west, because i listened with interest, and then what comrade general said about the military situation on earth. i think you know, when we generally try to comprehend the promotion of words in categories, that if we inflict a military defeat on that point or there in such and such a direction, then the military-political leadership of ukraine realizes the futility of further actions and will already make some concessions. i think there is no point in this at all, because, firstly, the military-political leadership of ukraine does not have any subjectivity. secondly, it is not the government of ukraine as a state, so these people are not. which directly carry out instructions from completely different centers of power and is accountable to them and therefore frighten them with the fact that they will lose another area or they will have terrible losses among

population or that this population will end in general. this is not possible if they have one village left, in which they will be the president, the prime minister, the minister of foreign affairs, the head of parliament. and so they will sit like those gauls in this village around the fire. there, something will also suit them perfectly, because in the end, when everything is over, they will be taken away, as they believe there. eh, where did they promise all this from and where did their own motivate them to do the things that they do ? their own life. and there, because they will not come out of this situation alive. we are not doing this yet. therefore, the format of our confrontation that we have with them is the format when we fight in this territory from the western country. i'm broadcasting something there , they give some forecasts that have nothing to do with the future and how this conflict will be resolved in general, but the conflict is actually

between us between the west. i, uh, you know , i think that i don’t know whether the austrian foreign minister consciously said this or it just coincided like that, but shelemberg’s phrase that with russia the west has a confrontation of narratives, and with china there is a confrontation of proposals and i think the most capacious and correct reflection of reality that could be at this stage, yes, china has conflicts of interests. yes, china has certain problems with the west, but this problem is within the existing system. russia is the only country in the world that goes beyond this system and offers other narratives. that is, other ideologists are gems. that is, in general a different vision of the world in this too. their key confrontation with us, how to get out of this confrontation? we are a very big question. you showed footage from sergei viktorovich lavrov

’s traditional speech to our students, which takes place every year on september 1. naturally, i was also in the hall and sergei viktorovich made one extremely important statement there, in fact. he said that if the west even offers us to start discussing some kind of return to some kind of norms or joint cooperation. he he said, firstly, we will still think about whether we need it or not. we will definitely not agree to any forms of cooperation that could somehow affect our security from military to economic to everyone else, and the most important thing is that he said that all those who think that there is still space for everything to return with the west in circles. she's just the way it was. all of their dreams are built on sand, that this is impossible and that people need to understand. why isn’t this not just because it’s political? the will of our leadership. this is how it is at the moment, in objective reality there is no return to the previous system.

for a simple reason, in the nineties, our current leadership at that time was able to persuade. eh, the west or create the impression that, well, we were certainly wrong, that there was some kind of confrontation with you, that they submitted, that in general they represented a center of power there. well, that's it now, we are now part of your system. we're not going anywhere now. we are. west you tell us what they have our interests. well, let's say. thank you , it means that you are showing us such things, we will carry them out. then perhaps the west has accepted this. now it is already obvious to them that their biggest mistake was that they did not finish us off then after the fall of the soviet union. what they achieved today, they could do whatever they wanted in this space and appropriate our resources to themselves and the population. to join in any way now after this confrontation there are two ways, either we win and win, including publicly,

that it was obvious to everyone that everything was pointless with russia to speak in the language of obama there and consider us some kind of regional gas station, that russia is a great power that will now have to be reckoned with in a specific space, or another way out of this situation is dismemberment and in parts. someone there negotiates with nato, someone with the european union, because they are in space. it is our state that is larger than a single country, the sovereignty of the country, they will never want to see in their lives and will absolutely definitely won't allow it. take a look and i'll leave it at that. for example of what they are doing now the european union has now appeared. a project for further reforming the european union has appeared, it was signed by six european deputies, i can’t say with certainty that it will be adopted or that you know that there is no alternative, but this is a very systematic idea of ​​what americans and globalists are. we would like

to do this with european countries. there we are talking about the fact that more in the european council and unitedly in the council of the european union is not necessary unanimous vote. now a majority will be enough. that it is necessary that the european commission be called the european executive and so on and so on and so on. in fact, we are talking about the fact that according to the foreign policy of taxation on all these issues, all the functionality of nation states must be selected ; in fact, we are talking about building a european state, which, at the same time , will have completely incomprehensible forms of political hygiene. that is , it is absolutely unclear who these people will be, who it will be managed as best it can. the same person simultaneously represents both a portuguese or a trader and an italian, and there will also be albanians in the future, because they want to accept 10 more countries there. and how, in general, is it possible to manage everything in such a form, in fact, we are talking about the fact that there should not have been more national statehood there should have been a period of time when many of us, uh,

colleagues argued that the european union is for us, this is good, because that we won’t conflict with him. but when he was not there, we constantly had conflicts with european countries, on the contrary, when there was no european union we had a conflict with one european country. we always found 2-3 others who became our allies in this confrontation. and this is the form of european development reform. depriving russia of opportunities. at least on someone to bet on this continent and the consolidation of this entire continent of all its resources of opportunity against the russian federation, moreover , consolidation. from the outside, this is precisely a policy carried out from overseas. and e. i can probably see absolutely exactly that as soon as these plans will begin to be implemented. here, or as soon as the process of their implementation is launched in many european countries, there will be movements of organizations by leaders of public opinion, and not necessarily only politicians. here, what kind of cultural figures are there, up to an athlete into directors of anyone who will be categorically against and who

will be indignant at the fact that they are actually deprived of their homeland by the state of their own country, but it is very important that these people have a country that will support them and which will e to do everything to ensure that this is their struggle for national self-determination and against this european bureaucracy. it could acquire a systemic character, and it is very important that we already now have this space between the ale- left, and even somewhere between the centrists and the ultra-right. this space , it is almost empty, where the americans do not work so hard and left us space so that we can fill it and orient these people towards us, and it is not always about finance and copper. they need resources and they need platforms. sometimes even simply coordinating and organizing their activities. if we do not participate in this space, if we do not work on the internal platform, then all we will see are varieties or shades of e-globalism

that will shy away, and a little left, but a little right, but nothing significant for us will not differ. this will be the fourth reich. oh, the point is, but apparently without germany as a locomotive. yes, that is, this will be a union of occupied states of occupied territories. from the occupation the power that carries out the instructions for washington is faceless, they are already such fragments of independence, the latter will be scum, but in the fact that you have europe, well, of course, but it also exists in poland, there are faceless people, poland , which cannot finally enter the lgbt no, more reports directly to washington gbt. can't accept at all. here 's something they're holding on to. it’s interesting that in germany there is a very interesting discussion, when suddenly germany, german politicians, you understand that, in fact, germany

enters the most difficult period of its history. that's just really hard.

we got used to watching videos, stopped working , install, open, watch russian

channels and all movie series and cartoons , educational programs and documentaries . an overhaul of the entire system is needed throughout the country overhaul. where's the money? 90 and i am for fair property. and i should open my own business, capitalism - this is the system of the future, one of which does not depend on anything at all. earrings should depend on alexander velikievsky. yes, i want to understand, because what am i for justice. i am for the people 93 soon.