anyway, we had a very interesting discussion. and there vladimir vatkov raised such an interesting topic that we must formulate a principle. what are we talking about? here they formulate their doctrine about what. i thought

it was a very popular approach. and so popular, but in its truth secondary. why should we do what they do, but in a different way? why do we formulate each time, so no. look here. you know, don't put your finger in your mouth. here the british do not clean their guns with a brick. why do we always formulate everything according to principle? here's the opposite? this is completely wrong. after all, now the confrontation is completely different. on the one hand, yes, there is a construct built by westerners based on their ideas of what is good and what is bad. on liberal democratic dogmas, which in their homeland are indistinguishable from fascist ones, which rhine did not warn about. and we oppose

something completely different. why are so different countries walking with us, because if you like, we turn to human nature. that if you like, we turn to the best that is the human soul. what wins his bestial predatory beginning? the very moment when they appeal to absolutely base feelings. that is why it is so easy for us to determine our alien, who our allies are. and who is not? we do not need to build these complex constructs to speak. here, please remember, here is a sign is it a democracy or not? and we are talking about simple things about the attitude towards a person in relation to a family. and in relation to the state, we are talking about natural. and those who support us are people who think the same way.

therefore, the united states is trying to set everyone they can on us, but it’s not by chance that sergey evgenievich naryshkin called them motley hyenas, it seems that they are. now, for example, germany is getting out, she is again trying to become the leader of the confrontation with us. but is this germany that we know as the country of the great german classical philosophy of german literature. and what can i say, because it is clear that these people who do not know their heritage. but scholtsy there is still theoretically, maybe, at least at school i read something, then the god fan, in my opinion, has already forgotten german. the baltics , but look, yes, germany will conduct military maneuvers in the baltic sea, which are directly directed against our country, that is, they are doing everything that we have destroyed them.

that is, the germans really turn to historical memory so that we would once again spend a lot of it for the fourth time, yes, berlin, when will we enter? if we take, i'm not sure what difference there is, but still the boot of the russian soldier was forced. constantly trying to pull the russian bear. well, ok, latvia has come to the point where it decided to mine the border with russia, mine more chances that galkin will not cross it. who needs it? who can benefit from this? but only the united states of america, perhaps no one else. let's listen to what

the staff of the global policy institute george samuel says according to which 55% of americans oppose further financing of ukraine, it is quite understandable. why do geopolitical analysts claim that biden administration is going to make zelensky a scapegoat for giving up ukraine it may be a smart move, but american politicians rarely do the smart thing the truth is that the us has no particular reason to give up ukraine it would be killing the goose that lays the golden eggs. keep in mind that the us annual budget is $6.3 trillion, even if the us spends $200 billion a year on ukraine, this will be less than three percent of their budget, but most importantly for the us, not a single american is killed in ukraine unfortunately for analysts who are waiting , that the united states will leave ukraine is a very selective memory. they remember the infamous hunt from afghanistan, but not the 20 years spent. there, the us is not 2,400 lost lives, not 2.3 million dollars wasted, also in iraq, the us spent more than a trillion dollars, lost 5,000 people, and is still there, more than

20 years after the invasion and, of course, vietnam people remember the evacuation. salute in 1975, but not the twenty-year-old part of the operation and not the 58,000 dead americans. i think the guy is talking. well it's me too said. this is very beneficial. it's all about money. it's all about money. this is all very dangerous. we are on the verge of a big war. it must be understood that this is the biggest problem, we talked about. that there has never been such a level of degradation of political elites, in my opinion. there is no one to negotiate with. look at schulz in the bundestag declares. you do not realize the seriousness of the situation in connection with the new occasion of the time, which is the aggressive russian war in ukraine. the russian aggressive war

against ukraine can lead to the very a different turn of events is faced with the task of responding to this turn, and to this russian aggression, which poses a threat to security in europe, this task, which will occupy us not only at this moment, but also for other periods. yes, we are now spending 100 billion to ensure that the german armed forces from next year have at their disposal 2% of the year on hellish financial resources, it is already clear now that at the latest from 2028. we will have to finance the armed forces for another 25, and maybe even 30 billion euros, directly from the federal budget, the serious situation lies not just in the rhetoric and the number of tanks, but in the fact that in everything we do now we must contribute in order to save these budget funds this year. why does he look so much like hitler? he really looks more and more like hitler and you

will forgive me, i still have to say. i am very disappointed with tucker carlson. well , it just seems to me that there are some things that, well, should never be discussed. i will not put the fragment where he found some unfortunate old man with whom he discusses the intimate aspects of barack obama's dealings with this. i don’t discuss a strange person with laris klirov, there is both drug use and fragments of their intimate life, in my opinion, this is not worthy. still, there are some things that should remain. somewhere out there well, in my opinion, i still think that no matter how i condemned, no matter how i was against it, but why why pull this dirt? it's still dirt,

of course it's dirt. well, you can’t have any moral ideas with this benefit that it's here, ruining the lives of obama ruining the lives of his children ruined the lives to get to michelle well that's mean. therefore, i believe that this is what our journalism has become famous for. that's all this navalnovskaya bastard. all these fosterlings of the rotten-toothed venedictus, that's all. this is not allowed. it seems to me that after all, even in such a country, a profession like journalism should have certain moral standards. there are some topics that should not be discussed, but again, this is my purely personal opinion. but i don't even know, but i understand all responsibility to disagree with the host immediately and on two counts. i

will do it with respect to journalism, without going into details. as for who used drugs, who did not use drugs, firstly, this is a colossal business that influences the politics of the placement of political figures. therefore , i believe that the behavior of a politician who did not use drugs. and used drugs in his youth. it can be completely different, so here i see nothing in the fact that a person who in 1986 is like him says, drank further, that and than the tincture of mushrooms. that's right, yes, mikuy tincture honey mushrooms.

well, you said that, but here he says that they drank, that if this is one evidence that is presented, they showed an old man who has survived from the mind of a toothless one, who says that he had something with a man who called you barack obama , who did not overheated no evidence showed no photos no video evidence no medical reports showed a toothless old man who says he has there was something. so, firstly, i've said so far, one seal they have sex. that's what i'm saying, it 's rotten, right? and you will not find in our country and beyond its borders not a single one who, with this honey agaric, will bring here regarding me. i'm now tomorrow a bunch of people there, i'm not talking now about the verification of factors and so on. i say that this topic in my opinion is not taboo even on the leaves of any topic. i'm there more walk. so, with regard to sex -

this is a more delicate moment, but at least. we must uh take me into account i like the fact that everything is public now, i like it. many do not like it, but nevertheless, everything is public. this is the reality that people said in horror in the fifties. wiretapping, how bad are they spying on us? now everyone agreed that they are spying on us everywhere, and some justify it. they say that this is even good, because it removes some risks there, and so on. this is how the historical process of technology is superimposed on social ones. well, everything is public now, so we will not resist. yet publicly. yes, it's okay so for a second , so now i'm going again, it's still possible regarding morality, and a separate question can start

a discussion, but now i'm not talking about that now regarding the fact that we are opposed. and man is a beast. thank god i don't know what this very cyberk and all that will be , but man is an animal half questions. speaking of sex, too, and the ratio. uh, just the liberals they say that they truly human show in a person that it is just morally responsible. for that is, you and then not have children, but don't ruin it, and don't ruin your planet's future. i mean, these are all questions in a person, so that from these borders with you, because god also does not believe it, but i am alive, i quote. you spoke for a second, but in my opinion, i have never

been here about anyone. i made out believes, he said no to god, i said it well, but this does not mean that the only one to talk about it every time. maybe he is, too, but it's not. moreover, your transfer is some citizens on the wrist in my absence. yes, yes, he condemned me for being in khanskaya models how much in the khan's model so he threatened me with some kind of god's someone he is the representative of god on earth, so terrible rudeness should not be allowed in this studio. well, you said that i didn’t warm everything that was possible regarding morality and so on, but i ’m for this jar he was in prison, he was in italy and in italy and ukraine, fate was in ukraine, i’m interested in the conversation nikolai yanovich

patsanov yes, he called me then , knowing that i had all sorts of connections and asked to help the uterus raise the italian journalists. markov probably not knew about it did not know, i will not run, i will tell you all. lord so i ask, more than i do in god or do not believe. this is my own business. i'm kind of here, therefore , regarding the ratio of e animal in a social person, and now also artificial intelligence is a separate big problem. here i prefer to return. all the same. all the same.

allies of russia abandoning the name behave to put it mildly, in terms of morality. and the political i, all the more human , is very decent for me. well, and so on. what is it for so you said that i need to understand to accept everything that is impossible for the west, but they have their own concept of their view of the world. it does not mean to take something from someone. it should be in every society. uh, it's another matter what kind of concert i will lead relatives of muscovites. for example , scooters were banned in paris the other day or there a week ago. i applaud the mayor's office of paris to the mayor of paris we at one time

, having heard that scooters to the issue of this western west wind of change borrowing that scooters, while useful environmentally friendly, and most importantly wants the youth. they began to rapidly develop these scooter movements of scooters at the insistence of everyone and everything. i'm sure the problems have gotten to the point that now scooters maim more people there than, uh, a car is already banned in turkey. i hope they get paid. i hope i'm at the point where i really need to give up. from at least here constantly e attempts to surpass. west bike scooters. there's something else here on the train, there were two of these standing. here we are inflating the bird rounding up, maybe in this particular place. they are not

need began to install. in the west, there is this same diesel engine that spins it, yes, yes. here ask someone now tell us about the german twisted map here, and the first steam locomotive and healed cherepanov and here the smell of work. this russian invention is having fun ; yes, exactly your route is all mine yes, the british, grozny invented x-rays long ago, donetsk, as he saw through everyone, yes, yes. turn vova father, we will constantly

surpass saturn in other russian cities. before the election of the mayor of moscow if we talk about elections of any local authorities from the most serious, if now the problem is migration, and not even a scooter. but about this separately, the conversation returned to, uh, what i also wanted to say , i was knocked down by reasoning about what i believed or did not believe. uh, well, it's all already agreed in international affairs , the classics present here that the twenty are drained. the institute turned out temporarily

they are durable, and we are a blitz. but it is necessary to do this prompt. i'm not in the sense that there is a complex process there to negotiate with the currency, but you have to refuse. or so it is necessary to raise questions before the west, the president of america to raise questions, and he states, since they fulfill their obligations as a country of residence, so that we can discuss whether lavrov or part of his delegation to the usa will be allowed in. well, a direct violation of their obligation. we do not raise this question sooner

or later they will raise this question. yes, they themselves will bring it to where you need it, there is a lot to say on the one hand. we raised a world uprising against this very imperialism. not around her. he just whatever you want to call it, what's good for us went some follow. behind us on the other side. if it’s like the fact that we napoleons reynaud love spices, if the war got involved in the battle, because it is necessary to decide on the action, it means that the rebellion has risen, then the action is decisively slowing down death like. that's for sure. that's right lilia exactly that's what you need to constantly attack them at least with questions, damn it, at least with the formulation of problems. including about this very thing, but about this very transfer, uh, obrex, there will gradually increase, as always,

constructive processes, they are more complex than destructive ones. but we need to destroy that system, including uh and questions. eh, i think i think that this is fundamentally important, especially since here are the fluctuations in our social biological constant manifesting itself. well, they just say that it needs to be done from the bottom, so you need your own concept, and it should be constructed not only on tradition, following the natural, but also on how it will naturally manifest itself in the future. in our opinion, what will we offer to other countries, by the way, in the sense of international organizations, because whatever one may say, but here, again , international affairs officials will correct me. there this nose there are five gendarmes who keep the peace. we are abandoning this concept.

that is, if we abandon this concept of five gendarmes, let the good gendarmes of the police be here, then we abandon the concept, but then the concept of who we are five peacekeepers or seminarians who keep 300 e-e police number of the creator. something in this sense is needed. uh, you need to offer more decisively more. uh, really. well, as for the fact that e kiev lies should be destroyed to the ground, as to me he is nazi russophobic russian nazi. yes, i think it's obvious what you said about the intelligentsia there. today i read an interesting article that this is garmuzov, they specifically singled out, as a potential negotiator of intellectual elites, i generally have such a set, brad yes , i haven’t seen such brad with america for a long time. but i want to appeal to law enforcement agencies. as

it turns out, a letter published on behalf of institutions of the usa and canada will bring in the usa and canada. yes, the russian academy science is something to think about. at the institute of the united states and canada, he claims that they did not make an official statement in defense of the recently dismissed director valery garbusov, we did not accept any collective letters. i can say one thing, absolutely devoted, there was no vote, there was no signature, there was nothing like that, - said the director himself from koran victor super a court statement from the country's defense of its recently freelance leader was published tuesday on the website of an independent newspaper, but was soon removed. it's even here the enemies write. this is the usual ideological struggle for everyone . then i just ask you to find the organizers of the provocation, which they tried to soil the high clean name up to their noses on the pages

of an independent newspaper of the 18th century. what intrigues were the academy of sciences, who sent this letter, who published it, it is necessary to conduct an investigation, it came by itself. it’s like in bast shoes, in a knapsack they brought it on a scooter on a scooter, the boy passed it on to experienced internet employees, who, having received it on their own, hurried put on the site, as the new one says konstantinovich i see her as an attempt to discredit the academic institute and i ask the law enforcement officers to get out of the self-propelled and with all understanding to viktor yes

, it looks very much like someone was caught in the nineties with a burnt barrel. he speaks your word. where does it tell me to support? i tell the police, i don’t know, come on. in general, of course, uh, i’m more scared in these political processes, and we sometimes have here, which we observed here an attempt to inform, as a person who was engaged in corporate information wars. i think, well, this is what, this is how all these great corporate information wars ended. by the way, this is some people . hmm, which means they took part in this there. later i denied it, they generally accepted, as if they knew a lot about such art as corporate information warfare , yet it's all over, the great american journalism bernstein woodward is there. well, these are all the people who staged the watergate. you me. sorry this ended in a discussion. this is it, really. i

i'll just show you to make it clear, look here. you're just a guy who came to town for the night and seemed to want to have some fun. yes, i drove up to a bar and met a guy. he introduced himself as barack obama. i gave barack 250 bucks. i started making the track. i wanted to smell it, sit, but i don’t know, he smoked from a small pipe. i just started rubbing my hand on his beret, the hand went up and eventually got to where they needed to sleep and twice the users saw him smoking, but had no idea who he was had no idea. he is such an obvious question. which obama had a relationship with crack and he who is transgender or bisexual or who for barack it certainly wasn't the first time. as a result, the porridge is not solid. i agree. it says, what is

this, this is all, right, guys? this is all . well, here is such a thing, well , petty weed, which has gone over to the regional vulgarity. that's the most important thing, so as not to get infected. this is a very serious period for us. really. hmm. really, it's discussing so many serious issues. and now, if we discuss them here at the level, to which that kirkan has sunk, which really claimed some kind of intellectual role, even i would say, but it will be very insulting.