go soon , one position that serious american analysts are not taking into account here is that russia may not sit quietly at this time. well, the british are very thoughtful, remember, yes, the whole offensive was with the bushes, because the bushes got in the way, so it didn’t work out for the americans. now they proceed from the fact that it seems that we are also very exhausted and interested in some period of such calm. no, i don’t think so, that

’s why the same mcgregor says that the guys don’t expect, most likely, we must prepare for the fact that it will be very hot, but uh for the whiten administration, which lives in some such world of its own. it's more important for them right now. of course, it will be to sign a comprehensive partnership agreement with vietnam. the vietnamese are preparing for this. so that biden would be very biden there, probably, it would be set up after all, finally, it seems to vietnam. here's vietnam here's whiskey now now, of course, he needs to be zelensky, here it will be me too. i will be very interested in how he wants to seize the agenda at the g20 summit now nasa sample yes, a sample of the dacha, salivaan said that biden will talk there about the economy,

who will talk about the financial system , will talk about ukraine, that they will support it and everything else will really be agreed upon. this is how it became known today to coordinate. you didn’t succeed in the final declaration of the twenty, but the guys don’t talk about it. aiden knows this won't happen. no, he was offended. he said that i am. but what about who is this? yes, she says, no, no, so why should there be? well maybe either discussed no, zelensky does not go to the twenty industry, yes, well, they immediately said that the boy is not here for you, so the problem is twenty. i don’t know if the americans will save her, but we will build our own new brix. and who was

nothing? well, they accepted someone there, i don’t know who they are, they will help very seriously. well, now i will listen to everyone carefully, colleagues, the speech is very interesting , i will try to touch on them then. you started by testing, by the way, i also read it from sergey evgenievich naryshkin with a very great interest, because it is so multifaceted and very interestingly written very informative. there, sergey evgeny says that in connection with this escalation, which is being conducted by the west well, now there is uncertainty about the outcome of his political confrontation. i think that now certainty is still emerging and the visit is a striking example. eh, turnip, erdogan to moscow, even all that surrounded him was his visit. oh in sochi sorry in russia and i meant it. well, all that was around was the visit, if we look back like that, uh, from the moment.

when turkey broke these promises and extradited the nazis from the azov battalion to the ukrainian side, after that the russian federation announced that we were withdrawing from the grain deal, it’s not that one is connected with the other, it’s not officially related things, but the chronology was after this is why the turkish country said that we will 100% meet in august, putin will come to us , we will have a meeting in ankara here in russia, he said he won’t come, there won’t be this meeting. there was a whole government meeting held there to discuss it. how prepare for the meeting with putin in turkey. hmm, ours with iran said they wouldn't meet that. after that , discussions began that no, it is still very important that the meeting takes place. she didn't pass. after that, the turkish country was forced to come to sochi in order to hold these negotiations again according to such an eastern tradition, apparently, before the negotiations it was said that they made such loud statements that today, when will we leave? in response to requests for an approach, we

will report something about such results. mom, don’t worry, you you will all be amazed at the results we will achieve. well, there wasn’t even this press approach, there wasn’t much discussion of the results and the disappointed head of the turkish state said that there were no prospects very far from the world , and the head of the russian federation , the supreme commander-in-chief, said one phrase that should not be underestimated, when it comes to about diplomatic language. he said, well, turkey aspired to be the negotiator between us. well, ukraine just threw it into a landfill and achieved with it agreements, which suggests that we are more of a complex multi-step with the participation of a large number of parties. we are in these stories. we won’t interfere any more; the opposition is very clear. follow our terms. after that we will watch. do we agree to this format or not? and what is

an indicator of what is forced? yes, they are in a hurry now, of course, they are in a hurry , they want to negotiate with us for one simple reason, because they are losing for them , this is obvious, the second passed sergei evgenievich wrote. and this concerns what you discussed about my classmate vladimir and vatkov was also quoted as saying that we need an ideology in foreign policy there. i think that this is an important remark from naryshkin in the article that the ideologies of the 20th century and these ideological systems have fulfilled their role and, in fact, all the ideologies of the 20th century have become a thing of the past. these are the ideologies of modernity. they all revolve around the relationship between the subject of ownership and various forms and in reality. today we often very artificially call someone leftist right-wing someone liberal. liberals are everyone who does not agree with liberalism. if they agree a little to the left they call communists, if a little to the right they are sure to do it. although

the spectrum has changed a lot and it all looks much more complicated and yes, of course, ideologies go away. do they need new ideologies to replace it? it’s impossible to exist without ideology; this is actually a myth. that you can take and somehow live without ideology, and the myth is actively spread by liberals. so let's say, every time they say, let's do it we will be without ideology. they mean giving and will be our ideology. but we won’t call it ideology. we will call it universal human rights, freedoms, whatever, but not ideology. but we will simply ban the rest and brand them with shame without ideology. it is impossible to solve the problems that are written about below, what is said there, that after the collapse of the soviet union we were faced with the fact that the west was destroying our economy, let’s say this is a simple question. and they are economists, this question is not of an economic nature. we restore economy. we shouldn't wonder if we need economics. why, in order for us to raise some

official indicators in the imf rating, but let’s say the population doesn’t feel this , or we need the economy in order to increase the real well-being of citizens, but there are countries in which the gdp per capita indicator is acceptable the population of any one country is higher than that of another. but the population here is happier than there and the society is much more stable than here, where can the gap be huge? this is the question to answer answer. it says that our science was being destroyed, the west is great. we have a lot of people here today who write a simple question: god be with him, what have we been there for 20 years or how long has it been in charge? this is a british private office that determined whether we write articles or not, let’s say if it weren’t british, let’s say we were in the abkhaz ranking of a scientific site or would fight for you know first place. i have another question. i want to ask, in general , what a scientist should really be defined by methodologically. how many times his article quoted by certain people, if i write that this is this, there is coffee and 400

people will say that i am an idiot. this will have significantly more quotes than a person who says that this is a glass of water everyone will say, yes, and i will have much higher these indicators and what is the use of this science, we will build it. yes, it will be called, now it will not be british until russia, which methodologically we really just want to take and stupidly count. how many times was someone quoted? where or will we still be attached to the real results of this activity about culture are the same, if we do not decide on culture, this is important, but immediately after

before we return, just yesterday we just took part in the discussion, and our friend dmitry kulikov expressed a very deep thought, how interesting that the article was frank. a pro-western view of russian history and such a teaching through the lip of everyone, but no one, and at the same time he is an expert in the american on the american topic, but not on the russian one. but none of those involved in specialized russian history answered, probably based on corporate spirit. what? well, why discuss this? the academy, therefore, such a question, maybe the word should be taken in russian? from the academy well, maybe, well

, why talk? we all understand that, apparently, everything is determined by the grenade capacity of the statement. a patriotic position is not a grant, but then let them all be academics, but if they think that, well, why are we going to speak in this discussion? well, what difference does it make to insult the motherland? well, really, just let them be. abstract institute the academy of sciences is not russian. they are high-blue mufusails, maybe not then. moreover, i am sure that among them there are both a patriot and people who are sincerely loving, but, probably, who think that there is something. from a few different points and why is it not necessary? i have a feeling that the name was not

called a shestan. well, maybe even then, that is, take the russian word. come on, there's the academy of science. the ussr was, of course, well , the ussr unfortunately, it no longer exists, returning to culture. yes, uh, regarding culture and in general any areas without an answer to the question. why very it’s not even difficult that there are some personal preferences, that we want there to be an ideology, ideology is a vision of how we want to arrange society, economy, culture, education, anything if you don’t have a vision of the future, like we in general , we will determine whether we go there or not. we'll just sniff there on the way, i don't know who to look at. how do we need to understand what our destination is, that then at least we evaluate the right one, the road is going right . are we going or not? and finally. it also says passing absolutely and finally. this same article talks about what dear colleagues were talking about.

in my studio, the fact that over the course of all these years the west has tried in every possible way to reformat the friendly post-soviet states in the past and incite against russia is, i think , the most important topic, because no europe, no european country, in terms of its significance for our security, can be comparable with e space of the russian empire and then the soviet union this space. this is a red line for us. she not discussed. i want to bring a few months, which just need to be forgotten and removed . in general, from the lexicon of the russian political discussion. first, we are now busy in the siberian federal district, and we are busy in ukraine, which is great. this is a phrase for ourselves that we are busy now. here the european direction can allow a small european state. well, excuse our ancestors. they left us a country from europe to the border. from china to the pacific ocean there. we are forced to work on different vectors of our enormousness all the time. the advantage is that we the largest country in the world also requires

us to be able to constantly concentrate on completely different areas of work, let's take the second thesis and, in spite of our grandmother, freeze our ears. well, well, the population chose them. now let your colleagues look. this generally needs to be forgotten, firstly. no population by itself can do anything in these countries with all due respect. well , there the choice is not between us imposing some choice on someone, or the population making its own choice. no over these decades, both funds and most various western organizations did their best to bring the situation to the position in which we find ourselves today. i'll just ask a quick question. well, do you remember when the one who elected, uh, that means, the population who elected viktor yanukovych and this elected population, the legitimate president of ukraine, made a geopolitical decision that he at least wants some time for zhenya . is it possible for

ukraine to associate membership in the european union or no, how did western curators react to this? they accepted, respectfully, the choice of the population of ukraine who voted for yanukovych no, they immediately brought the matter to the conclusion that a revolution happened there. why tashkent was a red line for the policy that they pursued should be obvious to us. there is no format in which we can allow anyone other than the russian federation to be present on the territory of the post-soviet space ; we cannot share it with anyone, make compromises, create joint information, or include it in the configurations and security architecture of local people. this is not a territory where we have any interests. this is our living space for us; if it doesn’t exist, we will have to say goodbye to vast regions of our country. we then roll to moscow russia and on

cappuccino and latte. we won't go far. if we want to continue to exist as a great world power. we must understand that there are regions in which there should be no one except the russian federation, and if this is necessary, if we see that some mechanisms are not working, which we previously tried to implement. means, they need to be changed. if some institutions cannot solve the task at hand, there is no need to change the task. we need to change institutions then. and at the very least one should ask the question, really after all this time? so it was that our colleagues asked this question many times without even predicting the same question, someone else, on the contrary, predicted that it was very good that everything was going this way and there was no need to make any changes or anything else... then all we need to do is simply remove these words from our vocabulary. and this old vocabulary is what you they said that we always exist within

this western discourse within western civilization. it’s as if we are fighting for sovereignty within the west and we don’t want to go beyond this configuration for this reason, we always use some words, agree with the configurations imposed by us. in this space. they should not be there, this territory of our interests , russia has never left from the moment our queens came there , and russia will never leave there in her life. and if suddenly someone has some kind of illusions can this arise from? well, that means it is necessary for our country to discard these formats with ours and yours, complementarity, some kind of diplomacy as harshly as possible and close the whole damn issue and not even discuss it, because the south caucasus will follow, the north caucasus will follow the north caucasus, krasnodar territory, stavropol territory edge, we'll take turns. this is how to come to terms with the new geopolitical reality, central asia will be followed by the volga region and siberia and all

our other territories, we have these questions up to us these western colleagues need to be brought to the forefront. do you want to play? there is some news with us , you know various types of competition formats . well, on the territory of europe it is possible, but this is the thesis that the local i will conclude with this, that the local leadership or some local political leaders. they. well , they can say something there. well, really, where will they go? they understand that without us they are not the same people. they are not guided. the national interests of their own states and the interests of their own people these people are guided exclusively they are ready for their own political interests. i said this about the leadership of ukraine and this applies to many post-soviet countries . are they ready to lead one village if they are the president or prime minister there, or don’t care what the territory is? how many people will live there? we also thought in the nineties that eastern europe itself would be interested in being a buffer between russia and the west. and

what, what is there to do with this at all, we will trade through them. they will earn a profit from this. they eventually became the west, so we don’t have to assume that whoever benefits from it needs to firmly establish their national interests in this space and throw out from there everyone who is trying to get in with us . problems to create several systemic issues. what language is spoken in tajikistan, seven more in tajikistan, it is tajik, where it is studied in russia, i don’t know , well, what language is spoken in uzbekistan , uzbek, where it is studied in russia, what language is spoken in kyrgyzstan, where it is studied estonian latvian lithuanian belarusian moldovan ukrainian? where are the languages ​​of the peoples of kazakhstan studied? nowhere where are specialists trained in these countries? in which educational

institutions do the ambassadors who go there speak the languages ​​of the host country; have they often never studied these regions? we have a separate ministry that deals with this; it solved problems. and now it’s nothing like the quality semenor decided to work to tell the disintegrating russian state, some are competing for another ministry, they were first appointed there, comrades, and then they were completely liquidated. and managed to extinguish many local conflicts in time. it was just then that there was a gigantic peacekeeping activity, and there was a lot of good stuff there, one might say, vladimir sorry

, the policy of national reconciliation in tajikistan still exists. here is vera mikhalych serov absolutely. if he can confirm the book, by the way, i am writing. you said when you were not a minister of this cis ministry . this is my minister. he had control. something you will solve it completely. so there is a very important system here. a separate ministry needs a system for training specialists. we are talking about armenia now, but where do we study the armenian language? we are talking about georgia. and where we study georgian, it seems easier to take. eh, armenian, no, it’s not easier, this is fundamentally the deepest delusion, little is disrespect in the country. this is disrespectful to the country. why do you have to take it this way? well, okay then. let's take the americans in america, and the chinese in china. this is

a fundamental disrespect for the subject of study. where is the institute? how do they say all the time? all drugs? yes, for example, there is the south caucasus. how did you propose such a branch no. which institutions deal with the problem of central asia ? now a certificate to write to the dusters in the system of relations, who will write paprika now i’m going where i said there are no specialists, and that’s easier. but because, when it seems, our soft under the belly, there is nothing. this is a serious topic. fine? listen, i remember you. uh, the same episode from a century of history, if such a party that can take power in russia there is such a party there are such people they will write references and so on i will correct you a little. still in the oriental faculty. st petersburg university is studying and there are uzbek languages. well, not much, but i

just don't know, it's just a statistic error, in fact. you're right. they are not taught anywhere. well, because, in fact, this makes the tradition of a 150-year-old imperial clash, when they treated it in a completely different way. i think that seeing what is happening in the south caucasus, uh, central asia in the same kazakhstan, i know a little bit completely and that situation from the inside, to be in kazakhstan after all, no one was ready for this situation. it happened literally. here, in hot pursuit, a decision was made to send troops. so, csto. this is a very difficult situation, because if this decision had not been made, then the outcome would have been different in ukraine and in general in russia there would have been an outcome, and perhaps there would have been completely different conversations in this studio and so on. and who is it, who does all this? he is the same here in these academic circles. you see, who forms the doctrine of foreign policy, but where the ministry of foreign affairs refers correctly, he goes to the relevant institutions and, based on

the certificates of these institutions, the doctrine is implemented accordingly, the doctrine and the cis well , we see that we are 30 years old. uh, i don’t want to, not like seagulls, again, a garden, which means throwing a stone in the garden, but for 30 years we thought that the cis is some kind of living structure, but it turns out that where there is no russian military base, an american and these cis countries have no independence, that is, it is at the academic level, because someone 30 years old. at least he didn't say a word against it. these are doctrines. nobody promoted, there were no forces that would do this, but i disagree with my colleague a little about the fact that the right left and socialism - nationalism in its form is dying off, on the contrary, it seems to me, on the contrary, it is becoming in the new time in the new digitalization in new society - this is manifested by other incarnations, but still the right and left vector is preserved, but again. where is this ideology? here we are talking about it, where it is formed. well, in the kitchen, or something, she is formed either in the gateway or somewhere else

somewhere in idle conversations. yes, it is formed in the academic environment. that is, ideologists. these are just sociologists , these are political scientists who are sitting on western grants, among other things. if we ask, why don't we have an ideology? why is this area of ​​foreign policy pressure not growing in our country, because 30 years. we at the academic company will not take others now. we are, in fact, the cryptology of one specific country. and, accordingly, from there to these here, it means that trucks are also coming. this and so on appears and so on. it means that what is happening in china in terms of academic in the network for the first time means how we study it. but we, after all, when how many discussions were there that china is not with us, because from scratch, or something were born? yes, i will not list academic circles here, everyone said that china will occupy, which means an intermediate position between russia and china. yes, nothing like china took our position at once in all publications. the media is actually our position is occupied by the flows of oil, have been redirected and so

further and the like now sitimp on the g20 does not go, which is just like that, whether it does not go, so, uh, reading the chinese media, it turns out that he moved from a personal plane inside the country to a train. you understand what is happening, that is, the situation is so tense inside the foreign policy that he travels by train, the universiade was already there, which means he received other guests there, and so on. so here it is being discussed. yes means further the last who congratulated biden. e, s. uh, how to say 2-6. probably the thrones, then the last of all world leaders, the president, so the poets call him a dictator. why no one gives an explanation, how can china, which wants to sit on two chairs? suddenly, this is a formal one, which means that the assessment of how it turns out sitimpin somehow we are incorrectly assessed as a moron. he was originally an ally of russia initially at the entrance of his power. but i write about it, but when i say that there is a separate grouping in the chinese eraser, which completely separates our

vision of the world from everything else. here. i am reading here is this person. i don't even want to pronounce my last name, because well, i'll be honest here. well, he's just not worthy of all this ethereal attention. this is just a person who wrote some texts, went up the career ladder, took a fat nomenklatura post, and now it means that he was removed from there. he also writes that yes, we will go to court. so we will consider you there. it means that we are here, supposedly. here we discuss it somehow. i don’t want this person who is unworthy of this time and so on, but nevertheless these people form and ideology and these people form and internally political. foreign policy constructions and so on, what do i agree to do? you have to get people from somewhere. let it be venture. in such a fashionable word, i’ll say, yes, that is, an investment that is not necessarily justified, but create some a’s and budgets to pour into these new institutions into new systems and look for people and so on, but at least not let cut. after all, this is a system, it’s not specifically this one, but a completely

unworthy human attention is a system, which for 30 years appeared in russia and how it appeared collapsed science fell apart, poor scientists, doctors of sciences. who remains in science, who receives additional funding for the same line of ful about it, who received it? so, stand up is an nc education, additionally, and so on. that is, the west systematically worked systematically for generations, nurtured these scientists, who are now a whole generation. these are the so-called scientists. again, which prove by citation index, that this is coffee and not water, supposedly a scientist and now when, for example, we take. here’s a simple , absolute example: one person , who doesn’t have a scientific degree, has a doctor of science , candidate of sciences, and i’m listening to him, because it means he has a little plaque there. yes , i don’t want to put everyone under the same brush again, i don’t want to, uh, revenge bullets, there are really worthy people there who are really interested, but they

listen to these guys, and these guys have been receiving grants abroad for 30 years. from abroad and so on. let's at least we will stop funding science abroad. wow, dress up. the assault is inevitable, you will never take mariupol, we have no way out. this is our house of civilians did not give them the opportunity to leave. now look now, they will come out with

weapons. yes, i’m leaving for the dog, who surrendered to carry out the main order, the blocking was forced into a breach. felt-tip pen do you want