[000:00:35;00] next in our broadcast, the international review program group 20, how relevant is this association, what is more important is the economy or politics, how ankara has learned to take advantage of almost any situation and the 75th anniversary of the dprk pyongyang is celebrating its anniversary, we don’t

just look at this immediately after the advertisement. it ’s me cheburashka and i have a friend grisha one two three four five i’m going to look for us, we’ve been playing since the morning.

falling apart into pieces is always nearby. everyone who is truly dear? thank you cheburashka you are a true friend, just like grisha’s dream came true, just like his dad’s. we need yo back times change friends remain sber is its own for each generation its own for 16 million friends. noodle bit lunch 49 99 magnet price, what do you need? why choose between what to buy? when you can take a loan from the post bank and

buy everything at 4% per annum with a guaranteed rate service, go to the post bank for money. in the scooter we knew that the main thing in a plumer is creaminess, and ekaterina knew how to find natural cream for this, we make the scooter well together with you free card with 10% cashback on everything get a debit card for life. and it became because there was always a free

alpha bank for the smart and free. we at the scooter knew that people would warmly welcome iced tea, and daniil, the original technology for its production, the scooter we make well together with reinforced concrete. we check employers and mark them. choose a job with confidence avito cashback 60 million rubles. with a sberbank client. open a business card, pay at any convenient time and receive 10% cashback for purchases during the promotion period. hello on the air international review in the studio fedora lukyanov today in the international review program events of the week

chronicle facts comments new order of the world order who cares, the group of twenty prospects themselves are in action? the art of turkish politics erdogan opens a window of opportunity materials from our program. north korea gains a second wind pyongyang copes with the anniversary of a new place in modern politics. a major international event , the g20 summit is taking place in india, no, well, not quite at the top, the chairman of the people's republic of china and the president of russia for example, they didn’t come, not quite twenty , they invited more and not quite in india, the participants were invited to a reception on behalf of the president of the country named bharat. what the hell is some kind of confusion, let's take it in order. in the late

nineties, the asian financial crisis revealed the vulnerability of the international financial system, and it became clear to key developing countries that the group of seven format needed to meet more often. so in ninety- nine, the g20 appeared at a conference in berlin. by the way, the concept itself arose in the russian translation by mistake in in the early nineties, jason stood for the group seven, and in russia as graven big seven. they also began to call it twenty. although, in fact, the group of twenty today has 19 countries and the european union as permanent members. this is argentina australia brazil great britain germany india indonesia italy canada china mexico russia saudi arabia usa turkey france south africa south korea and japan in the countries

of the group of 20 about 2/3 of the world's population , 2/3 of world trade and 85% of the world's gross national product initially, ministers of finance and heads of banks gathered, but since 2008, during the financial crisis, the status of the twenty has grown to include heads of state and government. it was more like an emergency meeting. the first anti-crisis summit was held in november 2008 in washington, the next one was in april 2009 in london. and in september, the twenty met in the pitbook; the preparation and development of the agreement is carried out by the so-called sherpa , the country's trusted representative of the chairman; decisions are made on the basis of consensus, but do not have mandatory forces and subject to approval by the international monetary fund, the world bank and other financial and economic organizations. initially, the activities of the g20 were limited to economics. but over time

, it acquired a political character. in 2013, in st. petersburg, putin and obama discussed the syrian crisis. the result was an agreement on the chemical disarmament of damascus in 2014 in brisbane, australia , the focus was on the ukrainian crisis in 2021 in rome, in addition to climate problems , they discussed the iranian nuclear program, and the summit in bali last year became a platform for discussing options for resolving the ukrainian conflict and extending the grain deal. until recently, the g20 was considered the most promising international structure. almost a prototype of a new model of global governance, clear criteria for membership, the most influential countries, specific results such as, for example, calming panic during the global financial crisis of 2008 or the destruction of syrian chemical

weapons 10 years ago and talk above all about the economy, that is, the last substantive ones and the twenty brainchild of liberal globalization of the era, when profitability took precedence over geopolitics, and economic problems were sought to be solved by all the worlds. now everything is inside out, globalization is over, politics has put the economy on its back and everyone is for himself , agreeing on a memorandum every time a battle in which the process is more important than the result, so there are no special results. apparently, it’s not worth it, that’s why not everyone came. for

new delhi, it’s still a milestone, perhaps never india was not courted, since now the lady is pleasant in all respects, everyone is fighting for her favor, but she is picky, and in general for connections without obligations, of course, india does not want to be part of something foreign, india is building its own and this is always about lasting peace is the slogan of our g21 presidency . one family, everyone must work together, they huddle together in a block, and the key to this is the strategic autonomy of each strategic autonomy. this is cooperation on specific topics with different partners with those with whom it is necessary to resolve this issue. our country’s ties with india are long-standing and deep, and new delhi does not allow itself to be drawn into a confrontation with russia. but objectively , relations are going through a difficult moment; our closest partner, china, is , to put it mildly, the number one irritant for india, and our

main enemy, the united states, is the guarantor of geopolitical balance in asia why are we leaning towards the us cause the situation in the endo -pacific region? for us, this is the most important space, among other things , trade worth 300 billion dollars. if, for example, something happened in the south china sea panama will hit hard. this is why we want to be associated with a country that stands for compliance with the rules specifically here in this region. india, by the way, would be glad if russia played a more active role in our part of the world. let's see how the forum goes. will the indian organizers be able to achieve international consensus, the struggle within the country is intense and the government did not take advantage of the acacia next year’s elections four days before the alley itself began , when an official invitation was sent out to delegations for a reception with the president

countries. only the name there is not india, as is customary in the english word. using anahendi bharat, there has been talk that the ruling bharatiya janata party is going to hold a vote in parliament on renaming the state. well, as an informational occasion , nothing, but in essence, bharat is not news. this is the official name. eh, since '50. uh, india is called hard gonaraddi. well, in the official language in hindi and in fact , in the english version of the constitution there is also a note regarding the word bharad, and in the theme that india bharad is an equivalent concept. in fact, the ancient name is one of the names that

was used uh, well, starting from the first century first century bc the first recorded written uh hmm mention. eh, there’s a name for this one. eh hmm, a legend from king bharte, and about his conquests that here is bharj, and the possession of kharote is all of modern india if we talk about such a boring historical point of view, then the name india is an ancient name, and in the first there is a written source, in which is present, the name of india dates back to the sixth century bc, and the first written source in which the name bharad is present, but this is the first century bc and the name india is, in general, not

colonial at all, but it ultimately goes back to to the sanskrit word sinhu, which means river and uint. the hinduization of the national brand is a long-standing desire of right-wing nationalists; it fits into the global fashion for identity. now pravda gives a little away to political technology; the opposition has recently formed, and a fairly broad alliance against render-mode, uh, which is called india for short. and calling political blocs in india that way is not prohibited by law and uh, c. well, soon enough, fashion will go to the rendering, uh, for elections against the bloc, india , a very powerful one that has a fairly high chance of

winning, and the opposition says that fashion decided , uh, in order to avoid such a bad situation, to rename india to hart. accusation on render fashion in the polarization of indian society hindu nationalism damage to other religions and cultures resound loudly with the opposition and western supporters of the prime minister look at his nationalism with positive nationalism. yes, he is betting on him, because he needs to unite the country and present an image of the future. there is no other way. after all, india is incredibly diverse; such heterogeneous diversity can be brought together. only there is a society with one goal and a common vision of the way forward, not backward. this is what it does to show people that we all have a bright future in common, to give hope,

this is nationalism. how not to treat indian it is difficult for the prime minister to deny that under his leadership the country has achieved a qualitatively more noticeable position in the world. well, if now we manage to convince the rest of the world to call it bharat, in general, hats off to burma. so we managed to become myanmar for everyone, not to say that they began to live happily ever after, but it was still pleasant. there is another country that recently ordered everyone to call it turkey last june. she agreed to implement recep tayyip erdogan's decree and rename his state in all official documents to turkic president the turkic people visited sochi this week and were waiting for him with interest. firstly, between moscow and ankara. it was cold in the summer. it needed to be warmed up. secondly, the assumptions came from somewhere that erdogan would persuade

putin to return to the grain deal; the cold was also dispelled. the current russian-turkish relations are an interesting phenomenon according to objective parameters, doomed to conflict. however, since the middle of the last decade we have been balancing very productively on the brink of it, without breaking down, the chemistry of the leaders is present, but what is more important is no ideology turkey demonstrates the mastery of pragmatic resourcefulness completely in its tradition. the diplomatic traditions of modern turkey began to take shape during the heyday of the ottoman empire, which was then called a high port in europe and began to be reckoned with after sultan mehmet ii conquered constantinople in 1453, turned it into istanbul and his followers became sultans. selim the first and the university and his son suleiman the magnificent soon conquered the entire balkans, the coast of

the eastern mediterranean sea, egypt and the hijaz in the west of the arabian peninsula. the first european missions appeared there in the middle of the 15th century. among the first to initiate were the poles and russians, and a little later the french; ottoman diplomatic traditions were first set forth in the famous collection of laws on the eve of the three sultanies of mehmet. unlike the european one, the ottoman ceremonial provided for the payment of daily allowances for foreigners. diplomats and their assistants, by the way, leave the high port of any foreign diplomat. could only with the permission of the sultan himself, the russian embassy in constantinople received a permanent status under peter the great, until that time an embassy was sent to turkey with separate specific instructions to conclude a political union or treaty in 1702 , peter andreevich tolstoy became the ambassador

. it is noteworthy that in the event of the outbreak of hostilities, the port concluded the ambassador of a hostile country with all the towers of the castle throughout the xviii centuries , many representatives of russia visited turkey as captives of this castle. tolstoy, shafirov, sheremetyev, obrazkov, and bulgakov in the 19th century. this custom remains only in legend european diplomats in 1793, the port founded its first representative offices in paris, vienna, london and berlin with great respect. sultan mahmud ii became the european style of diplomatic office work; he specially studied translations of notes presented to the grand porte from european embassies in 1828 during ramadan, he was the first sultanov to go out into the street in european clothes and instilled this fashion in his officials and officers . the ottoman empire was the first country in the east

to adopt forms of european diplomacy and entered the system of european international relationships. turkish ability to maneuver at one time i studied turkey during the second world war and one thing struck me. yes, we all know, of course, that turkey was on the side, yes, germany until the last moment, then it concluded an agreement with the allies, but what struck me was that given their geographical position, with their resources, with the geographic geopolitical opportunities that simply provided their territory, and so how should

the turkish fare in such a monstrously difficult global political situation, government so as not to lose a single soldier, not to lose a single person, so that modern turks have dates forty-one forty, five thirty -nine forty-five, they don’t mean anything to them, they have enough cunning to do absolutely nothing. the tricks of wisdom and resourcefulness are to avoid this massacre and avoid it, first of all, for your people. this amazes me, it is truly worthy of respect from the point of view of national interests, but you can’t trust such an intricate partner as and nowhere concepts of partners. here you have the concept of the sultan's army, everyone else has fallen down. so, all that bothered him were slaughtered, and those who could not be slaughtered, these slaves were driven away, the useful ones were taken away, the rest were also slaughtered. they selected the good masters and the rest,

which means they were sent away. eh, there are completely different categories, there is no concept of a partner. there is a concept there that is beneficial for us to listen to for the benefit of my land. this does not benefit my land. this will help us become stronger. this will not help us save no, all other categories. no. if someone stronger comes. then yes, okay, we obey him, if someone is stronger, who is the one who can defeat us and enslave us, relatively speaking, if there is no such figure on the horizon, then no. and of course, the east respects strength, above all. we also like to use it, but at least something can serve as a guarantee of fulfilling the agreement. nothing at all benefit and power they will be observed exactly

until. uh, the power is on the side of those who need these agreements and and these agreements guarantee benefits exactly as long as only this will end, the agreement will be broken. after the collapse of the ottoman empire , the founder of the turkish republic, mustafa attack , proclaimed the doctrine of peace at home and world peace to save the new state, he turned to the ussr for help in may 1920. turkish nationalists sent a letter to soviet russia asking for help in those days turkey was fighting a war against greek british french armenian and italian forces. a month later, a response followed: russia provided turkey with 5 million gold rubles, weapons, ammunition and food to help lucare. moscow sent one of

its most capable generals. mikhail frunze memory of these events. immortalized. in the prestigious istanbus quarter , the soviet ambassador is depicted together with ataturk. semyon oralov helps turkish nationalists. lenin was guided by geo. by calculation , the soviet government came to the rescue of the enemy of its enemies. one of them was ottoman turkey, to which the bolsheviks, following the treaty of brest-litovsk, ceded significant territories beyond the caucasus in march 1920. sultan mehmed was the sixth to admit defeat. in the first the world war agreed to the occupation of istanbul by the victorious british, french and italians. the sultan declared kemal datur a komitezhnik, but the rulers did not have much pacification of the uprising in the decision of the british and french, a punitive operation was entrusted to the greek troops. russia's historical sympathies were on the side of the orthodox, but

lenin destroyed the system of previous alliances aimed at helping the turks frunze and the plowshares defeated the greeks in letter. lenin was grateful and wrote that turkey would never join the alliance directly or indirectly directed against soviet russia, but already in the twenty-year ataturk banned the communist party , and its leadership was repressed ankara did not enter the orbit of soviet influence, but returned the port of batumi to georgia until the mid-thirties the ussr continued to adhere to the policy of rapprochement with turkey when in the thirty-third voroshilov arrived on a visit in the hangar, and the doterg allowed him to take part in the military parade, placing him next to him, but stalin and ataturk, although they respected each other, never met, according to one version, because of the status of the montenegrin straits. stalin himself never signed congratulatory telegrams addressed to turkey and personally

erased it in 1938. after the death of the founder, foreign trade turnover between the two countries decreased noticeably ; some soviet and turkish consulates were closed during world war ii. turkey hesitated for a long time, but eventually joined the anti-hitler coalition. , and after the war the priest. the us orbit of influence and eventually became a member of nato, ratsk ties are again facing a test of strength , tensions are growing in the south caucasus between armenia and azerbaijan moreover, the relations between russia and armenia are at the peak. yerevan demonstrates that the ally is deeply disappointed in everything will end with another regional redistribution, especially if we add the nervous reaction of iran ; in turn, its relations with azerbaijan are worse than ever russia and turkey are the main power in the region from they rely a lot on the hope that imperial traditions. in

this case, they will help to force everyone to behave rationally. peoples who lived dominated or lived as part of a great empire, they differ in some way maybe a certain, well, not that the breadth of the soul is a certain broad view of the world. here the empire was wide and great and the peoples of the empire. they have retained this imperial mentality, which is expressed in many ways in particular. so proud. and a very self-sufficient attitude towards the world. and they live for themselves first of all and for everyone because of this self-sufficiency for any people. they see how the turks also feel like equals and heirs of a great empire. and this is not just

a momentary thought. this is a picture of the world, with by which they live is a huge patriotism. that's a huge amount of self-respect. this is the absence of the need to follow someone, to obey someone from other peoples, to be equal to someone, to resolve contradictions in the region. it would reveal the rich potential of the north-south transport corridor, although there would also be no competition there. let's not skip the route. it may differ from our authors from tehran about the iranian version. this is a board port lookite in a bone is a sea port of chebar, it is located in the southeast of iran and has direct access to the indian ocean. in last years. it came into the spotlight because iran, russia and india decided to use it as a global

transit artery. it consists of two ports, shahid kolorit and shagit beheshtit, through which almost 9 million tons of cargo pass per year , most of it comes from russia and is delivered to chebar by rail or highway, and then goes to india and heads the organization of the chebahar free zone for about a year. he intends to turn the port into a transit hub, despite western sanctions that have hampered development iran's industry of materials is a challenge that we overcome every day; sanctions put pressure on us; we don't have enough time and resources. we learned to work in these conditions. so we have already achieved some success in destroying bahar, the last point of the international transport corridor north-south, which connects russia and eastern europe with india and the persian gulf countries against the backdrop of the escalation of the conflict in ukraine, this direction has acquired strategic importance

for moscow, becoming an alternative to the traditional route via the suez canal it will connect a landlocked state in central asia with the countries of the caucasus, eurasia and russia, the network already connects russia with the persian gulf, the indian ocean and china. it is a huge region with a population of more than three billion people, a very profitable market. the north-south corridor will allow russian goods to shorten their journey by bypassing the suez canal ; transportation becomes 40% shorter and 30% cheaper than traditional routes. thanks to the transit of sports goods from chebokhar to russia and back, travel time will be reduced from 6 weeks to 18 days; transport costs will also be reduced by one third compared to the expensive passage through the soviet canal , the corridors of the north, south, used by asian european countries, but for russia, iran and