uh, the solution was found in the declaration regarding the need to achieve a fair and equitable balance of interests. once again, i will repeat. the goal is not close, but movement in this direction has begun. we, in turn, will continue to strengthen these positive trends, including during the presidency of brazil next year at the twenty and june of the south african republic at twenty fifth year. by the way, prime minister moddi, closing today's last meeting. i said he would poke, eh there will be another g20 summit online via videoconference before the end of this year, most likely it will be at the end of november. so this will be an opportunity to take another look. uh, how do i agree on the agreements that were approved today, how they are starting to be implemented and and more effectively pass

the baton to our brazilian colleagues. well, i guess i 'll stop there. if you have any questions, i will be glad to listen and answer, please, channel one. sergey viktorovich to you prozorov of channel one tell me please, but such dissonance was easy in the reaction of western leaders in the west. for example, the sunnahs of koshel said that there were harsh formulations addressed to russia in the declaration, that this was a success, while the western media also called this a failure in the ukrainian direction. how can you comment on this? well, probably, there ’s no need to even comment here, you’ve read it yourself. and i think that the western leaders that you mentioned, if they consider everyone, uh, such naive people and explain to everyone that this text is a condemnation of russia there russia is never mentioned.

uh, things are mentioned there that i just said and which i repeat reflect the persistent work of indians and other like-minded people who did not allow the activities of the structure that was created to solve the problems of the world economy and global financial to be turned into some kind of politicized circle. and uh, what they write. eh, the media i read different assessments and fainan shaltan that this is a failure of the west and p. on the other side , someone else, i think, reuters e wrote that this piece of the joint declaration is west agreed and passed on as ultimatums to the russian federation funny adults spreading rumors that are simply impossible to take seriously, so we

once again thanked our indian friends. they put up their watch with honor and brought in the essence for further work on. democratization of international economic financial relations i want to say this word that we did not say that this was the ultimatum that you spoke about on the russian side. perhaps with the turkish president and other leaders to resolve this problem

the same as president erdogan. and president putin has repeatedly expressed readiness for this, namely that it is quite possible to resume the black sea initiative, but exclusively in both parts of it, not only the export of ukrainian grain, but also, uh, the removal of any obstacles to the export of russian fertilizers and russian wheat and others and other cereals. and a lot is now being said about the fact that, uh, mr. gutesh wrote a letter addressed to me. uh, despite diplomatic criticism , this information and the text of the letter itself were leaked to mass media. uh, but after reading the contents of this letter. uh, one gets

the impression. what now? unfortunately, they are trying to use the secretary general. e in order to promote unilateral approaches, because the whole point of his appeal is that let’s urgently renew the ukrainian grain deal. and we will do this within a month. something to connect someone to swift for two to three months, we will somehow try to negotiate with the insurance company lloyd a well, and so on about swift and rosselkhozbank - this is not true, because no one promised, including mr. gutersch. and what about rosselkhozbank, uh, swift will be returned, they are trying to persuade us to agree to a completely unrealistic scheme, so that the branch of rosselkhozbank in luxemburger will play this

function, but it has a license for banking operations in general, it is already there, uh, it has exhausted its capabilities. it will close there. well, there are a lot of such fulloids. eh, mr. guterish told me about jakarta. e that he seemed to have agreed on the placement of some kind of un consultations on the site of this structure to the question of what are the functions of the answer? we don't either, we appreciate it. uh, the efforts that antonio gutarovich is making about this more than once, the president spoke about this and i expressed gratitude to him for what he is doing, but these efforts are all doomed, and in a situation where the west only promises. a and. a. by the way, it forced me. this forced the deputy spokesperson. uh, general mr. hack

the other day at a press conference say uh what the secretariat in all these efforts does not in any way violate the regime of sanctions illegally imposed against the russian federation, that is, it is already fulfilling the secretariat’s responsibility. uh, american and european and other sanctions. and this, of course, is indicative of such a reservation. i hope that this is a reservation, because everything that mr. dudrost seeks or sought to do was precisely to lift sanctions on our export of fertilizers and food. well, by the way, as i said, both europe and the usa are only promising to take some steps, but now, for example, uh, they said that our company is part of the proposal that was handed over to us. uh, what about russian

fertilizer companies. they will be returned frozen actively. however, these companies will still not be allowed to conduct banking transactions. well, here’s the proposal that everyone is talking about, don’t take these uh halftones everywhere. oh, and let’s not forget that the official, uh, representative of the ukrainian foreign ministry directly stated that kiev is categorically against uh, reducing sanctions pressure on russia in in any form, including in the interests of the export of our fertilizers and food. so judge for yourself. uh, who is here, uh, what positions does he occupy? who is telling the truth and who is not telling the truth? but president putin clearly and repeatedly said at the moment when all

the actions necessary to remove any obstacles to our export of fertilizers and grains will be completed, and on the same day we will return to the collective implementation of the ukrainian part of the black sea initiative. rossiyskaya gazeta mozhet in its article uh, published in the russian newspaper? uh, the prime minister of india, in a rendering fashion, named the goal of darius' chairmanship of the twenty, i quote. e. overcoming disagreements, destroying barriers in the family, seeds of cooperation in the nourishing world. what do you think, sergei viktorovich, were these lofty goals realized during the indian presidency, and is it possible to count on them? that the next group of 20 under the brazilian chairmanship, uh, will turn out to be simpler and more constructive in preparing the final documents than

the current one itself was? i believe that what the president proclaimed is quite consistent with fashion, uh, the real state of affairs marks the beginning of a very important trend, and the transition from agreeing on some papers that are then not fulfilled to the fact that developing countries will still have to fulfill their obligations. on this, these themselves were much more consolidated, much more persistent in promoting their fair demands . wherein. uh, no one advocates that these demands be implemented to the detriment of the west. we are for the twenty to remain. she really is bout representative structure, and which includes countries whose share is probably 80 percent of the world economy. and uh, everyone is interested in working together

just to work. eh, honestly look for how i have already become a balance of interests. they promote their own interests to the detriment. uh, it’s interesting in the interests of others, and the motto of the indian chairmanship is one earth , family, one future, it emphasizes precisely this unifying spirit, so it seems to me, but the main thing is, uh, based on the results of this summit, and, taking into account quite serious such turning point changes in approaches to developing the world. the main thing is for the west to draw the right conclusions from what we approved here and from what it saw in the actions of developing countries.

so we were with the western reality of the american delegations, but the feeling of blowing away was not looking for this opportunity. those who wanted to talk to break you, as for you, they themselves chose and made their choice. contacts at the highest level between russia will of course continue, but i assure you, when the president of russia and the prime ministers of india agree about the next such contact. uh, well, this will not be announced in response to a question from journalists, respect for your publication

, please, tv channel, russia tv channel russia 1, we know that the approval of the declaration took many hours, as stated by the rp of india for more than 200 hours, but we did not you saw how it happened. you saw , please tell us what it all looked like with closed doors, how difficult it all happened. maybe there were threats of pressure. well, i didn't see how it happened, because 99% of what happened it was before themselves. and when we arrived here, of course, we stayed. uh, some touches, uh, which well, after all, you probably have completed their approval. i participated a little, well, indirectly, but no one saw them, because the guys who were doing it. uh, this

cher by svetlana lukashi, here present here, marat berdyev is our ambassador on special assignments, who worked with her. eh, they were taken away and locked up, as i understand it was locked somewhere 100 km away. and so, how the pope was elected, but there was just smoke i didn’t go, but what happened, in my opinion, was very positive. uh, there was a positive outcome. so i would like each and every sherpa to be a dry expert. uh, group of twenty uh, sincerely thank you for such honest work. by the way, they communicate well with each other, i’m answering the question of our indian colleague. that is , when when it happens

there was no time in the fields, of course, but in jakarta, when we were at the east asian kindergarten, yes, along the line. with subbomania j-shanker and discussed bilateral

questions, including yes, there is such a problem, because in the current situation , many billions of rupees have accumulated, which have not yet found their application and our indian friends assured that they will offer promising areas. where they can be invested, all our other agreements, including on military-technical cooperation, remain in full force. sergey viktorovich good afternoon, undoubtedly the signing of the declaration is a diplomatic success in russia and i have the following question: will this open success? eh, a new high-quality negotiation track. and on resolving other controversial issues such as the grain deal and especially the new uh, cis agreement. thank you. as you very clearly already understand, i feel like this

was such a turning point. and that, uh, those developing from the outside will seek justice much more persistently and more unitedly, but talk about specific possibilities for the implementation of this or that paragraph, which contains some kind of call to action. i can’t west repeatedly have my own signatures like this. eh, by and large he simply did not respect his promises and his obligations under the grain deal. there are limits there. everything must be at the same time. if someone has such a desire, and uh, this someone honestly signed up for this formula, then we need to work, as far as the agreement is concerned, with nv e. i don’t see any connection here; the agreement with nv is a russian-american agreement, which

was concluded in completely diametrically different conditions, uh, in the international arena in relations between moscow and washington, than those that have now developed due to the announcement by the west, a war against russia through ukraine with the aim of inflicting a strategic defeat on russia in these conditions cannot be about such negotiations on the implementation of the current treaty or on negotiations on new negotiations on strategic stability, although until the expiration of start-3, as we announced, we will adhere to it eh? parameters, uh, first of all, uh, numbers on the maximum number of corresponding weapons, uh, but uh, still, returning to the question of, uh, who is ready to do what, huh? the section that says that everything

conflicts in the international arena must, uh, be resolved peacefully in accordance with all the principles of the charter and that more than one conflict should not be forgotten. this is such a strong signal by and large, and it reflects rejection. e long attempts. the west will ukrainize any discussions in any format, but to the detriment. uh, decades of unaddressed, uh, problems in the developing world. and uh, including african countries, uh, this issue was raised ; the resolutions of the general assembly are still not being implemented. decolonization. france does not want to completely liberate the territory of the comoros and britain still does not leave the chagas archipelago. although on all these issues there are, uh, not one, but several decisions

of the general assembly. so this is the principle that there are no conflicts that everyone will deal with, because the westerners are pushing these ideas, and other conflicts, which means no attention he should especially attract this approach to himself. he is already changing and now there will be no western arguments. although maybe come up with something to sweep under the carpet, and all the proposals for both the poletin issue and the syrian problem. in many other areas, where it plays a very negative role in delaying the achievement of appropriate results. artie please, vladimir putin will allow western

countries, especially gemini , to demonstrate the seriousness of their decisions to reboot the african continent, despite the past many have actually taken advantage of some specific attempts to get rid of the internet. and you know, not putin nor xi jinping, and when he participates in various events, they do not prevent the west from communicating with african countries. who what's the connection, that the delegation is not headed by the president of russia, don't imagine the people's republic of china and

other representatives of moscow and beijing please, african countries are always ready to communicate, it's another matter, what, uh, if all this communication consists of a pat on the shoulder and such a disdainful attitude towards them sock necessary. ah, then, probably, nothing will come of it. they will be polite communicate, but they will still demand results not in words, but in deeds. yes, especially in what i said about technology transfer and at the russia-africa summit at the end of july in st. petersburg, we heard this very clearly and clearly do not want to continue to supply it with our noses. western countries , where raw materials are processed, value is added and then all this is resold for a very large

profit, nothing from which goes to the countries of origin of the raw materials, that’s why they say, we don’t need to, but constantly say, what we sell you, what we sell you, then give us the technology. we are able to provide for ourselves. moreover, we will be ready to send products for export to africa, the richest continent here. so we, well, we in no way prevented anyone from communicating with anyone at all. this is the west. eh, he runs all over the world and demands that no one meet us. well , he doesn’t succeed, but they still continue to run around and demand. we simply state our position when communicating with our partners and leave it to them. discretion. uh, how will they feel about our actions? but the west not only does the same, it also demands it. here, do as i said. well, who will like it, that’s why

it’s not putin who’s sitting here, he’s not sitting in the west, he has nothing to do with the west - how to turn to yourself, probably, yes, as our fabulist wrote there? can you make it louder? yerevan announced joint military exercises with the united states , which will take place on the territory of the republic and let me ask, this is how russia feels about this step by armenia and given the fact that it is being reported in the media that armenia can to withdraw from the akb does the upcoming exercise cause serious concern in russia? after all, they will take place near the russian borders.

thank you, i have already commented on this situation, of course, there is nothing good in the fact that an aggressive nato country a is trying to penetrate transcaucasia, uh, we don’t see it, and i don’t think that this is, but it’s good for someone, including for armenia itself where the americans wouldn't show up. they know, they have hundreds of bases all over the world nowhere. this doesn't lead to any good. at best, they sit there calmly, but very often they try, and select for themselves everything including political processes. we call this pity for the actions of the armenian leadership. we talked about this and uh, you mentioned dkb. eh, of course, such an agreement, which was announced for the armenian-american training, it looks , especially strange that for 2 years now armenia has been refusing to participate in the gb exercises , they explain this by saying that if it were so union

e, education with the participation of armenia if azerbaijan had condemned, then armenia would have started working in the dkb. and when we ask, why but you, uh, communicate with americans and europeans, who do not condemn azerbaijan, and they say, well, they are not our allies, so you should condemn such a rather strange, simple-minded logic, but uh, i really hope that all those allied obligations that exist between us and we honor them. and that they will still take action and prevail in the foreign policy of armenia regarding the fact that there is a threat to get out of the road accident, there is a policy in which they allow themselves enough statements in relation to russia, not just yesterday. it began

that when mr. pashinin was still a politician, he was not in power and raised the armenian people. uh, he then, with one of his slogans, proclaimed withdrawal from the csto and even from the eurasian economic union. well, many attributed this to, uh, simply due to the election campaign, the fight for votes. uh , mr. pashinyan did not express any such thoughts regarding the consequences, including during this accident in yerevan. and where, by the way, at the ministerial level it was the twenty-first year at the ministerial level, we agreed on the mandate for the dcs mission on the armenian-azerbaijan border , everything was endorsed, but in the morning our armenian

colleagues. eh, we decided to postpone this topic. so before you accuse us of anything. you need your own actions, some figure was assessed there , in my opinion, the head of parliament allowed himself to speak in the sense that azerbaijan gave karabakh to russia. well , it’s hard to imagine a more incorrect and, uh, dishonest statement, and he referred to the fact that karabakh was given to russia by azerbaijan, when, uh, putin, pashinyan and aliyev signed on november 10, 2020, and three from the first , a trilateral agreement. this is, uh, completely untrue. it says nothing at all about the status of karabakh, and at that time all three leaders

proceeded from the fact that additional negotiations were still to be held on this status. but when, uh, later in prague, where the uh, president of azerbaijan and the prime minister of armenia were invited, and they signed both statements, in which they said that they recognize. almaty declaration 1991 all question is closed the president of the prime minister of armenia signed a document in accordance with which the then nagorno-karabakh autonomous region is part of azerbaijan or it is not necessary to accuse us of the fact that we were still on november 10, 2020, but supposedly gave up karabakh. you have to answer this to your people yourself.

nikolai ivanov news sergei viktorovich jursky von der leyen and michelle shar and representatives of the member countries of the union and such a stock-headed snake are speaking on behalf of the european union. but on behalf of briggs, for example, they are not speaking. uh, the african union has only just been accepted . that's why this is happening, but not 100 heads double-headed, if the current summit is to be assessed. you know, we have been thinking about this for quite a long time and when in the past the topic of full membership of the african union arose, this idea was actively supported here, and it was approved by consensus and already today.