no one has ever leaned in before. well, yes, this is a difficult job, of course, there will be an analysis and the corresponding work will continue. well, it’s a pity, of course, that uh , that means the lunar landing didn’t take place, but that doesn’t mean that we completed the program. will be working. next, as for private business. ilona mask is certainly an outstanding person. this must be admitted. well, i think this is recognized all over the world, all over the world. uh, active , talented and businessman. he does a lot, including with the support of e american state. for our part, we also intend to develop this work and , uh, roscosmos has already made a decision, supported by the government, so that we will attract men, we will honestly attract their investors. uh, in this area of ​​people's activity. and quite successfully. those

events that are happening today as if in space or here on earth, of course , indicate that the age of global dominance is actually ending. and by the way, the multiple visits i mentioned. kim jong-un this the trend fits very well and, perhaps, it is only strengthened by the formation of a multipolar world that is happening right before our eyes, the very world about which there has been a lot in recent years. the russian president speaks. of course, this process is very turbulent. what the contours of the future world will be will be discussed, including at one session today here at the eastern economic forum, a session that we will show in the very next few minutes, but i give the floor to you about the apocalypse. yes anastasia thank you, we are following the events together anastasia efimova from vladivostok where is today the final day of the eastern economic forum.

the topic of supplies of western weapons to kiev was discussed at the un security council, speech, including about shells with combined uranium, everything suggests that ukraine is a scorched earth for the west and no more russian diplomats remind of the consequences of the discussions in new york natalya solovyova followed the usa great britain wants to send kiev shells with a metal combined with uranium, radioactive , toxic and very dangerous, but washington is so the details, of course, do not concern the theater of military operations far away. however, russia proposes to the un security council to discuss the pumping of weapons into ukraine virtually every month. we are seeing

an active hypocritical campaign in the west to claim that ammunition with combined urad is not at all harmful. soon they will prove to us that they are even good for health. i want in this regard. recall from the trial in italy where more than 7,000 military personnel were poisoned during the use of similar ammunition by nato forces in yugoslavia, and 400 of them died. wounds. 2.5 times heavier than iron. a liter bottle with it would weigh 19 kg, thanks to such a mass the projectile receives enormous penetrating force capable of piercing even tank armor. the united states used projectiles with combined uranium in iraq, flavoring in afghanistan. yes, equipment was destroyed on the spot along with it and life in vast territories. theses of western leaders known shells with suranium cores, supposedly conventional weapons, because there is no nuclear component in it, which means there is nothing to worry about and nothing to discuss, the fifth meeting is being held on the initiative of the russian federation for 6 months and the last request.

well, now there’s a live broadcast from vladivostok and let’s applaud each other for being with us today. thank you very much for the beginning of the panel session of the global alternative to domination. west counter the future this session was prepared by the magazine of international life. naturally, the foreign affairs of the russian federation is supported by the department of information and press of the russian ministry of foreign affairs, friends. eh, here i ask again in your applause, because in the past the magazines are 100 years old and before we start the discussion. i would like to give the floor to the editor-in-chief of the magazine, mikhail borisovich kurakina. thank you , yes. i just said, magazines turned one hundred years old last year; we are the oldest specialized publication in the world, despite such a considerable age. we are young and active, and

the magazine is published in a printed version in particular. eh, once a month. unfortunately, uh, physical space doesn't allow us to publish everything we want to publish on paper, so we're leaving, naturally, in the space where physical volumes do not exist, that is, on the internet we have a website that is, uh, developing. and we have a presence on all social networks, the website is in russian and in english. well, in general, i can, of course, talk for a long time in the magazine and , as they say, it’s better to see once than to hear 100 times. therefore, i suggest watching a short video that was prepared just last year for the centenary of our magazine .

international life magazine is a publication of the ministry of foreign affairs, to which you can rightfully use the word unique; there is no other journal like it in the world. these specialized buildings on foreign policy issues appeared in the year of the genoa conference and the conclusion of the rapole treaty with germany, which symbolized the breakthrough of the diplomatic isolation of soviet russia when the first issue of the magazine was published in moscow in 1922 , it became the world's first analytical publication devoted to problems foreign policy, international relations and diplomacy on his page. live, history the birth and decline of the ussr, the formation and development of the new russia, the russian federation, the role of our

country in the international arena. in the past , present and future. today, the magazine international life is used. modern technologies, of course, do not exist in paper form as it was 100 years ago, but nevertheless, the paper version is also important and in demand. yes, we are present in the main messengers on social networks, we reach a very large, most importantly diverse audience, bilingual format, even with a version in eight foreign languages various thematic issues from special projects make international life an important tool for russian foreign missions to conduct information and distribution work among foreign audiences, and a special mark of quality is that the magazine manages to maintain a balance, remaining interesting for both expert and general audiences. and

the conclusion of my short speech. i would like to thank the employees of the press information department of the russian foreign ministry , vladimir director personally watched you department for their assistance in organizing this panel session. thank you very much. well , probably on behalf of all the speakers, including. i would like to thank everyone at your magazine. i also really like the magazine’s motto. i have more people at home. well, i think these are not the kind of friends gathered here today. well, in more detail about our session, which i will remind you is called a global alternative to domination, the west's contours of the future. well, i think we talk about this quite often , including at the eastern economic forum, that politics global dominance has already set the teeth on edge, so to speak, and strangely more and more often they are starting to wake up and try to resist it, because there, of course, it is being imposed quite rudely in all spheres of our lives in all aspects of our lives.

of course it does. forms, including information attacks, which result in social networks and in popular culture and with the help of digital technologies and, of course, we understand that the main addressee of all this is young people, people who will be in set the agenda for the future. and i am particularly pleased to say that it is also present today. uh, in the hall of students who are also interested in this topic, and in what ways, and countries not from the west and russia as, probably, one of the most prominent representatives, uh, of this confrontation. eh, they will. in fact, fight it. what tools already exist now, if you know the ways to create a youth community not of the west but with your own program, it is important to note here. probably so that some kind of boundaries are good everywhere. what did i talk about yesterday? the president during the plenary session that if we do something, we are friends with someone, we are not friends against someone and how to preserve the personnel sovereignty of our country. how to stop the drain of young specialists. eh?

we will raise many questions in our session today. eh, we have some difficult speakers today. i will now explain why they are not simple, because many of them were also selected today, but because they also wrote for the magazine, and the international life of the russian ministry of foreign affairs for those who, friends, did not have time. we encourage everyone by the way, the authors. yes, mikhail borisovich will accept resumes, apparently from you. thank you very much, and i am pleased to introduce our participants today from the director of the information and press department of the ministry of foreign affairs of the russian federation, official representatives of the russian ministry of foreign affairs maria zakharova, deputy writer of the state duma alexander babakov, first deputy representative of the federation council committee on international affairs, andrei denisov, also with us today on a video call russian philosopher, political scientist, sociologist and

public figure alexander dugin austrian statesman or diplomat head of the carringsley hill center rector of the far eastern federal university boris karabets and vice-rector for scientific work and the diplomatic academy of the russian ministry of foreign affairs oleg karpovich thank you very much. what did you dream about our session? indeed, mario vladimirovna’s first question is for you because this is the session that you initiated. well, it’s not the last day that the adjustments will be made. it seems to me that we could have started on the first day with in the morning with breaks for lunch at bedtime and then continue throughout the entire forum, because the questions are really important and necessary , but i propose to start with the topic, namely informational confrontation with this global dominance, because we all understand perfectly well that the stronger the digital borders, the more reliable the digital rear. and

this is much better for us. here is the work being done in this direction. good afternoon. i thank all the participants in today's session and all the guests for their attention to it. and i i would like to say that today we have something truly unique. recruitment of specialists, firstly representatives of the executive and legislative, including both branches of government. eh, m. probably, i will not sin against the truth, i will say that the hall is simply overcrowded with representatives of another power in the form of the media, which we will definitely talk about. hmm, additionally , there is no judicial one, but let today’s audience perform this function. we we don't know we didn't check the lists when entering, maybe and is present at the trial, and we leave the guests , uh, the results and, of course, the scientific community in person. uh, the leadership of two, in this case

, specialized universities that train international affairs specialists. and what is important? uh, answering begins to answer your questions, and it forms that very informational component that is so important now, uh, but you said very useful things, you said that it was not the last day to carry out such an artistic technique, it was also used in our soviet cinema, if you remember, wonderful churikova's film beginning and this technique was also used in foreign films, when e at the end of the film instead of a word. the end is written as the word beginning, i assume that what the viewer saw was only a prelude to something very important, more global, or the development of a storyline, or imagination and the audience, that is, everything is just beginning. today we have the same artistic technique.

yes, this is the last day of this forum this year. well, literally, probably, the final session, but it really opens a new stage. ahh, the vector is set was yesterday the president of the russian federation obviously, eh. the atmosphere was created by, uh, two literally at the junction, who passed through the twenties themselves and the brix themselves, uh, the fateful key ones, who turned the page, who started the chapter. call it what you want and , in fact, we’re probably just opening a new political science season, but this very discussion is the topic large-scale, but at the same time the topic of each person specifically, and before diplomacy, international relations. and i think that the generation, uh,

to which i now say hmm, will confirm uses the word earlier, but still there were uh topics, or the container was quite narrow, but for the initiated, enlightened, and so on, but they were engaged.

through various, uh, formats, through the information component of social networks, through voting, uh, through election cycles, and through citizenship, by the way, through, uh, a huge number of non-governmental organizations of an international format and scale, and the current change that i’m thinking about , today we will talk, and of course they cover everyone, because the results we we will see. the results will be large-scale, but they are also not only a reflection of the aspirations of the absolutely global majority, but they are the results of the activities of life and the civic position of the global majority.

this is very important without striving without struggle without hmm you know that? we would have waited a long time for the fantastic strategic patience, which, well, the active patience that the countries of the state and the people themselves showed for this stage and its onset. eh, it would have been delayed for many more years. what i'm talking about now is that you you call e not western manifestations, but thanks to the work of our previous generations, that is, ours. i mean, not only our countries, but the previous generations who were active, thanks to our grandfathers , fathers for someone. for some, they are already great-grandfathers, and who sacrificed their lives in order to prevent this terrible machine from slamming the door, uh, otherwise known as colonialism

, imperialism. and in the way of the 20th century, thanks to the generations that stood behind the processes of decolonization, these are both countries and peoples. actively introduced a struggle, including an armed one, in their countries in asia and africa, this was also done by representatives of the diplomacy of various countries on international platforms, reinforcing this struggle with international law and politically supporting it, and thanks to all these generations and thanks to the results of this long-term in many ways it was a tragic work, and sometimes it was just a life laid on the altar. today we are recording with you. the new stage that the president spoke about yesterday, about which so much has been written in 80 points of the declaration of the twenty countries and

so much was said to us and brix is ​​coming. the era of multipolarity is literally just a couple of years ago. eh, i remember the faces of western figures who winced when they heard this expression. i remember even the faces of our , unfortunately, domestic political scientists who said that, well, this is perhaps only one of the alternatives. perhaps this is just one of the options. but no, this is no longer an alternative. this is already reality. she will go on an upward path, this path will not be strewn with roses. and if there is, then these roses, of course, will be thorns, because we are yet to discover the world here for the first time. eh, this very multipolarity is to be formed. e study it and live in it. well, in any case, this is this. in my opinion, it’s very important, in any case, it’s better than a world of dictatorship, than a world of unfreedom, than a world of submission that’s definitely not good, i won’t say

evil, but it’s definitely not good, but a way to avoid the worst scenario. and what kind of world it will be depends certainly on us, on everyone, on the branches of government, on people in different countries, on civic position from activity and so on and so on. i also want to say relatively. this concept is not the west. yes leaving the west is not inclusion. the west does not take into account the interests of the west in the first place. let us still not go along this erroneous path, and which the west itself followed, not including, but fencing off, as they also say, isolating and so on. again , the president spoke, the minister of foreign affairs spoke, and the russian federation spoke repeatedly. we never, hmm , supported isolation. in general, as a concept, you have always been against unilateral illegal actions. we have always been for

cooperation, partnership and alliance, which is based on mutual respect and consideration of mutual interests, therefore. when we say not the west, this does not mean that we are against or do not want to integrate or into uh or do not want to take into account the interests of anything like that, we are only talking about counteracting violent domination. and by the way, speaking of the uh word, violent is very important for one simple reason, because if we are talking about real leadership manifestations, which well, in general, become the results of fair competition, no one is against it either, but the forced imposition of one’s vision of the world on others. moreover, those who have long gone forward and infinite. uh, urging that there are uh hmm so to speak more uh, correct less correct that there are

exceptional ones, and there are excluded ones. and if the prisoners are here, we are against this , therefore, by the way, and before not because someone was against the fact that there is a world currency, which is convenient, which functional, but because it is a world currency that has become an instrument of global struggle in the international arena. and what’s more, it’s a dirty fight, a fight that doesn’t follow the rules, and in fact even a hybrid war, so this is not the age of a new confrontation. this is not the age of some new confrontation. there was a confrontation on the part of the west in relation to, as it is now customary to say , the global south, and now this means a turning point has come and the global south or a separate integration association must, in the same way, displace the west and begin counteract nothing of the sort. no, exactly, it’s a different picture of rejection. it is precisely

this methodology that allows us to collaborate on equal terms and make the world a better place. we are ready to justly reject dictatorship, and to all forms of interaction, but once again on the basis of international law, on the basis of mutual consideration of interests, and so on and so forth. well, in general, all these principles are well known. thank you very much for opening our session. uh. here, especially for the phrase that 2 years ago they were still wincing. well, it's okay, it's a matter of habit, sometimes useful things. they’re really not very tasty, but then you get used to them and they’re multi-useful. i think everyone will agree that this is a useful thing, uh, colleagues remind us that

sovereignty cannot be achieved by the emergence of an accounting and settlement currency within the brics and the accession of many countries to this. this is just a designation of the fact that we want to exclude from the economic processes of financial processes that financial speculation that presupposes or which leads to the fact that rent is withdrawn in favor of a limited group of countries, but before americans. i’m not even talking about the mission income of the dollar, but in general this is the load we have, we know the figures that real gdp is

20 times less than the fictitious capital that exists in the world. this is a colossal huge mass that dominates the world economy and destruction of this level. the crisis of 2008 showed this back in 2008, and therefore the departure is complete. in the form of relationships, when we enter into relations within the brix and joining boris's country. in the economic sphere , it means that we want to bring to uh, a completely different level. well, it may be difficult to talk about fairness in business. yes, but this is the rationality of such a trading relationship based on the fair contribution of each of the herbs here is the product that it offers for sale, but i would be here based on this global topic. still , i would have singled out the next day, i was able to somehow communicate with colleagues from india from china and i noticed something very interesting. she was very responsive to the reaction when, uh, well

, the idea was voiced, the next thing is that we all it’s not easy enough to work in this place, because china, india, and many other countries, join us, they, we are all together deprived of that heritage, which in fact we can attribute to the west, that is, we were taken over by the colonialists, we are most of the countries these countries are multinational , multi-religious. that is, we have something that actually unites. we have common features in order to really translate this cooperation into a practical plane, but on the other hand , there are no answers to the questions yet. what kind of world? we do we want to build this together? well, okay, we, uh, criticize or appeal to what we don’t agree with in relation to the west, but what do we want to do? and here's the question. we must get an answer to this question not only within our country. but we have to offer uh, to the world that we