the most dangerous political game today , 50 years later, we can tell you something more. and mikhail well, by the way, i was very surprised, comrade. citizen blinkin yes, since he said about g7 resources. but the fact is that already in november 2008 after the crisis, a was recognized that there were already not enough resources to support the stability of the world dollar system. why did we make 20, so that

everyone else would help? this means that today we have already seen that already 20, too, there are no more resources. not to mention the fact that some countries there are already 20 participants in a completely unambiguous way. they demonstrated that they are not going to help; moreover , alternative formats are already beginning to form. they are not yet creating alternative financial ones. assystem, but groups are already being created and in this sense, i don’t really understand what the hell it’s all about, it doesn’t really understand, what is it about and this is the question, because uh, the most important thing, we already talked about it that month there back the most important conclusion for the american economy and special military operation is that they cannot implement training in their country on the basis of domestic markets. misha g7 what

does g7 mean - is it a group? so just a group? yes, we later said, that is, the main one. i just why? well, yes. if it’s dug, then it’s definitely not grade 7. there was another wonderful story. well, not now. the fact is that now, and a number of others, it does not go anywhere; the nonsense ingutsk system was created in 1944, only the economy. the usa was 52% of the world. yes, and here’s blinkin, he says , we’ve already got everything, it’s already seven to forty, that’s actually very little. i want to say that the united states of america today has less of an economy in the world than it had in the world economy in 1985. the problem is that there is no ussr.

everything else is fine. no, it's not easy. they kept explaining it to some group. the hiker collected the narwhal. so it’s simple, okay, it’s a long story. well, okay, classic management problem. is this the most work that still works if there is no industrialization? then, accordingly, there is no money to give money to everyone, because the whole model of the bretov woods system consisted of what we we expand, we get new assets for these assets and print new money and buy everyone with this money, there is nowhere to expand new assets, there is no money either, and today in the united states of america the trouble is that the total economic product that they create is no longer sufficient for in order to maintain their own

infrastructure created over the past decades. this infrastructure was created for a situation of constant expansion. no expansion, no money. and for this reason , in order to begin reindustrialization, they new markets are needed. rynkin. it’s not for nothing that he talks about uh, in such colonial terms, because they will have to capture new markets, that they are going there , the anti-markets are going to capture these markets. do you think they want to deepen the system of division of labor and use these new people, there are somewhere 69 labor opposite ideas of reindustrialization. no , well, how if you divide the labor. so you take it out in production. they are a log. it depends on what they want, they want to develop high-tech, everything happens. now

problems. even with this one. and the factory in arizona, which was supposed to duplicate the taiwanese one, why is this going back and forth? they can’t do it there, they don’t have enough engineers, they don’t have enough. moreover, they do not have enough engineers. not by chips. they don't have enough engineers to supply this factory , no problems there. why is there not enough water ? there are physical engineers somewhere when the americans are restoring them. no. well , of course, when the americans were restored , other states needed to build this in florida , now it’s in texas. no, that’s not the point for americans, has never been a problem, then you create chaos. he is where these engineers came, they bought purchases from the israeli conflict. well, what about the missile problems? the missile program? but it doesn’t work out, but they really want it and for this

reason i expect it. well, in fact, they are trying to create chaos in the caucasus, they are trying to create chaos in eastern europe and poland there about this very generally , well, about africa we won’t even talk, but they are going to seize southeast asia and this is an objective problem . that is, he believes that this is someone’s aspiration, it’s not like that. they are. they don't do this, then they are simply finished. so, they are preparing both their society and the world community, which is preparing for the fact that there will be a war because here, right here yesterday, literally one day, the secretary of the air force of the united states of america said that he expects a war kissinger last year and not or at the beginning of this he explained that there will be a war between the usa and china in southeast

asia and for this reason a big war. it’s like we can’t avoid it in any way and uh the problem is that your choice is which poseidon or sarmat, for now i want to look at this whole thing from the outside, and this is the problem of these wars, there is no longer a side, and it won’t be possible to look at it from the outside in southeast asia , but there are also your own, you know , in general, because uh, most likely we will be asked to work with india and israel to ensure the security of the indian ocean, because they themselves cannot cope without us. and, most likely, we will have to ensure the safety of the arctic. that is, most likely

it will definitely come in handy to reject aliens, which do they provide security? who will she go? there is an inscription sitting on the border , someone who doesn’t have nato will attack. it is militarily pointless to have only americans ; the poles will be there in a couple of years, but there is no one needed as such, that is, there are only up to five americans in reserve. now we can do it very simply, we can say that we are participating in the air defense system there, we will help north korea. he says, we are helping china and the system. there, the discovery of everything else , we can raise the umbrella on north korea, we can say that we are with china and north korea china will have very big problems, because the united states of america will begin to take away from them the bases that are built in the south china sea. the united

states of america will take away like, well, like like carrier strike groups landing operations aircraft carrier groups, can you imagine a target? well, taking into account he showed hypersonic weapons, so in general now the era of rethinking the fleet will begin. absolutely right, since no one has any idea what this military conflict will look like. the fact is that even a special military operation has already shown that all representations of western protags in the modern. they just don't work. well, look at where the nato members are, yes, here they are sitting in a bunker. right there or there someone else is looking at what is happening. they figured everything out. they had everything. they calculated everything on the computer, how quickly the cool thing will pass. the russians will all run away here. here we hit, here we cut, we go out to the sea of ​​azov, again it’s not a sea inside, we’re seizing russia, crimea and that’s it, great. he's a hopper and nothing works, so they

kicked the processor. let's work. here there is just a call to a friend, my computer is not working. he says, no, the computer is russian. they just turned out to be much smarter: there aren’t enough shells, and even theoretically there can’t be enough of them, because no one could imagine such a consumption and there aren’t enough soldiers. could. look, damn, there is money, there are no soldiers. and what they will do about it is not yet clear to me, it is not clear at all. here are modern soldiers. this is how he should be. this same war is called a question of completely different modern soldiers he also handles everything with the bucket, that is, all his consumables have become something that was impossible to imagine. yes, that means when your artillery works on two people. well, before it was, well, schizophrenia, you hit artillery, you level the whole place. and you have five people to the left, five people to the right and action. the whole war has become different . nato doesn’t even understand what to do? not

the whole concept doesn't work. they never fought against countries with comparable technological capabilities; the problem is that even if they figure out what is happening, today they do not have the industrial capacity to rebuild their army to suit the changed conditions. it turned out that we have them, but they don’t, but no one actually has them. well, that is, it’s so difficult. he just said that and that he didn’t, but it turns out that he has such a level of intensity, in general , the world is at war. maybe, if you take the total production capacity, if you look at everything that is necessary, and look at the consumption of shells, this question is simple. what goes faster? and here is a clear answer no, no one could imagine such a length of the front there, no one at all now for military science. it will be such a push. that is, it is no coincidence there, but we have a tradition of the great war of science, people there are now engaged in work. why have we learned so much faster this year than they

still have the feeling that we are superhumans? we know better, we will calculate everything now. now these same fools, the french and the american, need to try to explain through their lips that the ukrainians are simply fighting incorrectly, and now they’ll come. you go to analogue will get a second. we have a different management model. it is impossible to rebuild an industry if your profit center is in banks. this has nothing to do with any profit center at all when we talk about not yet. but not now, because now the army is ordering. it’s with us that i’m talking about them, but about them it’s the same, nothing like that. remember when they needed germany, how much they put everyone under arms in general, no one cared ; there was no bank anymore for the americans; when necessary, they bet they work under the gun. they are very good at translating industry into feeling; one should not underestimate a nation that has built its wealth on robbing others. what, what. but

when it is necessary, he knows how to mobilize the enemy, he cannot. no e underestimate it doesn’t work out yet, as it doesn’t work out. look more, you said that they are going to do the installation with more than four hummers. look at the south korean tanks , they are excellent tanks, they are ready to buy more in large quantities. of course, yes, the americans are promoting themselves, no need underestimate the enemy. the question is that a friend of the world, in general, cannot afford the intensity of such military operations, even stupid reserves. there will be enough materials there, as long as the reserves around the world are consumed faster than the forces have calculated , the world economy can be calculated, but to support a conflict of such intensity without a radical decrease in the standard of living of the population , a radical decrease in the standard of living of the population

requires changes. even if i agree with this differently, well, now modern military systems require a certain amount of earth metals. well, that is, we will list it there now. it won't happen in 5-7 years. they are rumors that they will not produce anything on the car, but simply there will be nothing to go to the front, because the front consumes a lot and a lot of things. that's the question, right? that is, even here the exhaustion and simplification of the system can occur. maybe, yes, acne to the point of stone. just curious. this is purely how to calculate mentally. why is this all going on? well, well, you can try. you can, here i am , leaving you with the talent of an outstanding russian soviet economist let's consider the idea. what will comrade economists say? well, continuation of the discussion from the numbers, but a small riddle and here’s why our answers, well, well, the western

partners in quotes, uh, send to ukraine such you know in the form of a dropper, there are 12 challengers 20 leopards in two, and four there are eight leopards in two a6 20 march, and the first leopards of which, well, at one time they riveted a couple of three thousand. yes, somewhere in chile there are two hundred storage warehouses somewhere else, but they couldn’t have melted everything there in the nineties and zero years. send little by little, but not in commercial quantities , they are learning to use them, or at least at the front lines such quantities have still been noticed . i get the impression that there is truly a global war in the form of a whole ring. conflicts like these, as they are now progressing in ukraine, are inevitable. this is peace, well, at least in the form of leading powers, but in the long term, such

a global war across the entire eurasian belt , of course, without the establishment of a hard dictatorship. there in the eu there will be no loss in the states. this is two third take care. they are their primitive leopards. one. there is a museum there with the technology of the fifties and sixties, because at some point you will fight more and less than because when it comes to the big batch of the real batch, there will be a couple of dozen modern leopards in modern challengers with medicine for several days. accordingly, for the next 2-3 years of the global conflict, the world will remain content with the instantaneous twenty-first american m60 phantoms and other, other things, that i'll scrape together the bottom of the barrel and get the americans from the storage bases. there is a storage base in the nevada desert where planes are actually torn out by natural justice. vk can rivet this. uh. there is no point here if you

are pulling out techniques, but you have yes , yes, i agree, so here we have to consider , of course, no one is saying that such a global mess will begin tomorrow or the day after tomorrow. i think this is exactly what the emphasis is on in terms of so-called industrialization and so on and so forth now regarding europe and uh, in fact, american plans. here in the states, uh, in my opinion, now a new community is being formed on the basis of all these conservative singhs and journalists. the troops are sofa troops, respectively, various neo-windows there robert kagan can give quizzes and so on, but with such direct proclamations. for example, he recently said that the superpower is not retiring. what is this about? this is about the fact that, after all, the united states , despite everything, despite biden’s dementia and all american systems intend to maintain their global dominance at any cost.

i haven’t studied history at all. why because all the powers? well , why should he study history? why should he read? why should he read? this is not in trend, but what is most striking, of course, is the feeble-mindedness and courage of our elochka vonderlein, who are preparing to accept the entire western balkans , ukraine and moldova, entry, even going to change the regulations of treaties and legislative norms of the european union , which attribute a certain level of economic development, a certain level. there is permissibility of corruption and so on and so forth, respectively. well, what is it? well, yes, this can be considered as such a political carrot dangled in front of montenegro, bosnia and herzegovina and moldova and other strange things. but this is just returning to the topic of the standard of living of the population. these are people who live quite modestly. and this is just human material. this is the first. second, uh, here comes the thought about the rat catchers.

eh, here we go again, returning to german folklore. i remember about the salon that started playing on the pipe and all the children left the city because he did not pay. well, uh, the european union now very much resembles such a pied piper, but in relation, of course, to its own population, because people are absolutely losing control over reality. uh, he believes in fairy tales that he invents for himself and retells to each other, and under this whole, uh, liberal media. eh, blow the whistle , the world is being reformatted and bam, and suddenly the world will actually find itself in a state of this global confrontation. ukraine - this just a little little fireman such a little fire. but what if it really blazes all over the world, which is what american conservatives are so persistently striving for. this is where it really will be a completely different story. and, probably, the world will be completely different even without a rogue superpower, because in

reality there are only two options: either incite a global war, or get mired in war yourself. inside. they are now half a step away from a full-fledged, not just a division of society, but a full-fledged antagonism into two groups, that is, the second civil war in the united states is becoming. more realistically, how can it be avoided? by the way, i see a new scenario, it seems to me, because now we, uh, events in ukraine have aggravated and somewhat accelerated the process in europe and in america , which we are still missing, because in both america and europe there is a management structure. it was a very archaic choice. yes, that is, it is not an expressive interest of the people of germany schultz, the people did not choose the elections of power in britain, the election system is such that i’ll put it in, only his chairs voted,

which and they talked a lot in america about the colossally archaic system in which the majority will generally be president is the system of electors. well, that is, it has been said many times, it is no coincidence that america has the oldest and existing political systems. they talk about themselves as a state, essentially. this is the oldest state. all others have been updated. after this , i have the feeling that after the migration flows after the emergence of the new wave of politicians, including including countries that have been for a long time. we will see such social changes and such new processes, both in europe and in the usa, that this can completely change the picture of the world, we do not work with this audience, by the way, which is a big mistake. we are not working, but these movements are already noticeable. we really believe that the americans are what was in europe until recently and that in the states it can be called the liberal nep

, the globalist nep, but there will be military globalism. i think that we will see a completely different role for european islam, which in many ways can so change the value range of europe and swing it to the side. by the way, and in novelistic values, including, the entire structure will begin to burst at the seams. there's a lot here. there is something else interesting alexandrovich well, i could be mistaken. i am banned from all european countries, i can about ursula von terlein. eh, important, of course. question it just seems to me that you need to watch her entire speech. in her speech there are several key questions, several key topics that, it seems to me, are fundamental to understanding what europe is waiting for, as you rightly said , some social movements there. what i mean is that she either accidentally or specifically named the number of refugees as 4 million.

these are the numbers. this is the key to understanding what's happening today. what processes are taking place in europe and how they will develop further, i’ll just try. well, it’s true, it’s inconvenient to do calculations in the presence of the chief economist, but i’ll still try to do a couple of calculations in order to explain to you, uh, i know this internal uh all the ins and outs of how how this kind of flow of refugees and refugees in general is paid for and how it is financed. well , since the locomotive of europe is still close to me, i will use the example of germany so that it can simply be extrapolated to all other countries. now, if you take today’s refugee who ends up in a european country, he practically becomes a recipient of social assistance. well, for germany, this means that, for example, a married couple of two people. i will round up the numbers and will not name them exactly, so as not to confuse the married couple. this is approximately 900 eurosocial assistance, if they have a child under

6 years old, is approximately another 320 euros. well, that is, we already receive, there are more than 1,000 and 1,200 1,250 euros. um, every month. uh, the family, uh, receives medical care - that's about 250 euros more. each month the family receives money to provide travel expenses for the visit. eh, some theater events are all included in social expenses. there are some other little things to help you get clothes. all this in a circle, a family of three will receive social assistance. well let's put it this way in round figures, from one and a half to two thousand , plus rent, rent, on average, in a family of three. if we take the berlin norm, this is 500-600 euros. additionally, plus additional overhead costs, that is, in other words, the maintenance of one such family, which arrived and is in germany, is approximately three people. this is approximately 330,000 euros per year. if

we simply multiply this figure arithmetically and count it by 4 million refugees in europe, we will get a colossal figure of about 120 billion, which european countries spend on the maintenance of this group of refugees who are here today. for now i’m only talking about ukrainian refugees. let's add to this another 5 million, approximately refugees. they call the gray numbers, and call those that are known, which have been around since 2013-2014-2015. uh, today. uh, in europe we get about ten million refugees and uh, the total costs of all european countries. well, even in some countries, they are smaller than in germany, but still it is about 250 billion euros per year. i want to remind you that in my at the time, saving greece cost 200 billion. in general, not per year, but simply 200 billion. and if you take the costs of nato member countries plus

canada without the united states of america, then according to the german statistical office, they spend approximately 350 billion per year there are 800 billion, and in addition the united states pays 350. these are all european countries plus canada, that is, they still do not reach this two percent of gdp and 250 billion annually, and the state must spend on these refugees. now let us ask ourselves, where does this money come from? and this money is taken only from the state treasury. that is, they either print, that is, they increase it, and the problem of impoverishment of the entire country, since an inflationary process begins, which has nothing to do with production or anything else. they take away parts of the kaz pensions . and we know that if we take germany , which now had two workers per pensioner before. they provided, but now for one on uh, two jobs per one worker there are two for one

one worker has two pensioners. they are the opposite, and if we add these 10 million to this, it turns out that the pension provision is pension. if you take it not today, but in five or 6 years, it will collapse, which is why there is talk about the need to raise the retirement age again. what needs to be reduced? uh, some payments need to increase taxes, vice versa, and so on, this is today a direct path to the fact that, well, in the very near future, if this continues. at this rate, europe seems to be on fire, well, just internal wars, including including civil wars, because if today the same germany lives on large savings, every family, in principle, has savings and can afford it, but they will run out. they will run out , people are getting old, new people are uh, the money is not going to the pension funds. these expenses continue to grow, and the most important thing for you is refugees, oh, whom we are talking about, this is not the category of people who will start working and begin to bring some money to the budget, yes, if

we take ukrainian refugees, probably some a certain part of them. maybe there is about 10-15% they will work for the state treasury, but i want to remind you that when i talk about a family of three, this does not mean that there is a husband, wife and child. this is his wife , her mother or some relative of hers and a small child. that is, these are three people who most likely will not work and will not bring money to this common treasury, so when today, uh, the fundline says about four million. she doesn't say further what's behind it. well this is definitely the one the very question they are all very good at today. eh, they're trying to imagine. where will all this go next? because if all this continues at the same pace , just imagine. well, let's say that these expenses. will be stored for 5 years. that’s about 250 billion each year . what kind of money is this? because today germany says we need

a fund of 100 billion to provide the bundeswehr with the latest equipment and weapons, we are missing 250 billion. are spent on, uh, refugees, and 100 billion is not enough for the bundeswehr. well, here, of course, about the leopards, one thing is certain, of course, he will pull them out in the same way as he will pull them out. these are old weapons. uh, the people's army of the gdr, which, in principle, is still scattered across many countries, not only in europe but also around the world, but it will definitely pull it out, because there are still quite a lot of weapons there , i once spoke about this in your program, so it’s not even the question is bc and it’s just how it will go. uh, relationships develop relationships to war. and the question. and what will europe do next? today there is no answer to this question. what to do with these? millions of refugees where to send them? how to integrate them? is it possible to integrate them? where can i get this money?

there are no answers to these questions on whom to put all this, so i think fonderland will gladly leave this post, because someone will have to answer for what they did to those who are there, every country now will say separately. well, wait, maybe everything was decided here you decide this separately now. and these are your questions, so uh, now the question is about the distribution of refugees. why, let’s say, there are such big problems with poland in germany, because germany says we are not going to lie to any more refugees on a voluntary basis, because they counted, when they counted the money, they shed tears, as they say, and this is the question. now i think it will. eh, that’s why, by the way, relations with america have become a little cooler, because the americans say you have your 2%, let’s pay it to nato. where do they pay them from? no and unknown. where to get them from will be in the future. now let's continue advertising after. in that composition