from this whole strategy on the t-23-30 , yes, there was a combined strike of this kind of combined strikes. every day we see on the line of combat contact, when our ministry of defense tells how many drones, how many missiles were shot down, and so on? well, here it was necessary to do something significant, this is russia now in foreign economic policy, it is luck . vietnam sent the americans for luck. india sent the americans north korea is woven into the overall defense system. it was necessary to burn something like that, and so that all the world's destinies would organize a complex attack. there is something very interesting about it. eh, the point is that not only missiles from torrent -do took part in it, as the british say, it’s somehow straight-up sincere confession that’s annoying, but we also actually had converted missiles out of 200 , there were also french scalps. but there is no ukraine for the french scalps of the su-24s.

so who launched these missiles from ukrainian ships, of which there are only two left, or did someone else help? i think they helped. yes i was there one arab country, when i entered the airport there. i liked the phrase. please respect our laws. and of course, russia lives in a legal framework, but let’s adopt our laws, which must be respected all the time commercial satellites work for war. they must comply with the law of war; there must be a no-fly zone not only in the air, but also in space when they arrive they will put up an electronic shield. yes, we could do it. we could do it back in soviet times, if we lack the complex, let’s do them. don't go with them don't go too far. i understand that we, of course, hope that in the west there will be some sober heads who will not allow the escalation to develop into a hot phase.

yes, attempts are being made, because they understand that if it starts, it will not be as american experts portray, that nuclear war is an easy walk. i read one expert report that they said, yes, this is a nuclear winter. this is russian propaganda, or rather a soviet relic. in fact, everything is wrong , nuclear weapons are not so terrible, well, they will die 30 million americans and they will win the issue. how will they win and how will they win? uh, let’s say analytics, here, uh, which they do on reconnaissance, when they assessed our forces, when they valued our defense during the offensive before this, for six months, we’ve been preparing for six months, we flew, satellites, drones. they probed our defenses. everything is completely resolved by virtual attacks on the computer, it remains lower and lower everything worked out there this idiot from america i said, i saw everything , it will be unrealistic, cool senator, yes in front of the bitch corridor, russia internal process well, where

all this means that they have problems not only with intelligence, but with planning in general and the setting of strategic tasks, that is, not only ukraine is losing, but also those who bet on it. and by the way, you have to pay for this bet, because the administration of the baydan, which did everything went wrong, as they believe, has crossed all the red lines, and it must report. after all, why did they go through this whole conflict, to bring russia to its knees, to destroy it, to get that wealth for nothing. well then they did it in iraq how do they do it? well , it’s just that russia has a strong army, but a weak economy. let's do it this way and what happened. no , males don't work, nothing works. in russia i fell into isolation no. strangers only consider it a blessing to establish relations with russia and, as they say, to build new economic ties. and what should the west do, what do they need

, not a day without interruption, and not the great hegemons, so this kind of message appears when, as it were, an ordinary situation is playing out almost a universal tragedy i hope that our quasi-patriotic resources will inflate it to the skies, and people will take to the streets with posters until they come out, our second understands who we are fighting against and what we are fighting for, we are clearing the infection from our earth from the infection that once this west brought us this ukrainianism, which in fact, in essence was one of the forms of nazism - banderaism. what is it called there? this is what it generally comes from when a person ceases to be a person, but military technology. well, yes, you guys have everything, as always on the computer, it turns out to be satellites flying in the neutral zone. we don't touch them, the drones fly. and here you are, according to these data , everything is just like peter in the game in real combat, when you fight against us, no reconnaissance satellites, no reconnaissance drones at 1,000 km.

i will beat everything, but before that, other hotels will fly to you, which may knock you out once and for all, threatens russia , threatens it, as they say, what do you dream about, your dreams will not come true, so ukraine was clear that it would lose initially. but those who raised the stakes said no, no, now a little more. now russia has cracked a little, so they tried to pretend that this was an offensive, to which vladimir vladimirovich already called seventy-one and a half thousand people. and now, probably, even more just today, 840 died just today, eight. the attack on the tickworm ended in nothing. it’s clear that the price in the west is already called 500,000. we understand that the numbers are underestimated. in fact, the tragedy is much greater. why can't they dial a new one, as they say, a mobilization

kit and throw it at ours, but still understand that these are untrained and unprepared. this is 100% for slaughter and there are no results, so not only ukraine is losing, the west is losing and losing significantly. war loves silence. it sounds somehow strange and there is a kind of fog of war, because here i am watching how we shout there, this is what is happening at work. well, that's what 's going on. what happens during the great patriotic war? this was generally reported to the top, but also yes, these there were hesitations, yes, but now it turns out to be a general situation where i didn’t make a fire bag, humanly speaking , it’s impossible to drag out screams and screams anywhere at once. today there are volunteers talking to them. they say that's why the armies won't let anyone in there. i say, how do you know if someone is a volunteer? what

do you mean, how do you even let them into the front line? what are you talking about? and then, willy-nilly, you snitched on someone, reported something, said something. or maybe you’re actually recruited, how can you verify? this is generally the front line - this is not a walkable yard. the location of the soldiers, what their moods are, who stands where in soviet times in general, how it was, right? enn regiment in the enn direction commander the era of constant openness, this is also not everything, just civil society must know what in order to do what this is such an unpleasant question. well, everyone knows and everyone has a heart attack. what's next? can you imagine? yes , 1942, forty-one, forty-three , civil society in the soviet union knows everything how it happens. well, how else, god forbid

generals are invited on television so that they can reassure the public and speak. we have a plan. stalin's we have a plan. we will be now. therefore, a little bit calmer. during the great patriotic war there were no such means of communication, but now i pressed the button and it flew away. you know, i spoke a lot and very often on your program about the role of the british in planning and implementing special military operations of various kinds of sabotage and sabotage operations, and i think i absolutely agree with you here that from start to finish this attack was planned and carried out by the british. i have absolutely no doubt about this and the main task that now needs to be solved is to take the british out of their comfort zone. well, you must admit , they still carry out

special military operations against the russian federation in the comfort zone. whatever takes his fancy. and at the same time, they bear absolutely no risks and are not responsible for anything, because they have ukraine , which is ready to take responsibility for carrying out this kind of operation. well it very comfortable conditions, and this is a must. what to do losharik yes now about the counter-offensive? you remember, during the period before the start of the counter-offensive, many experts argued about where ukraine would send its main forces to the donbass, kherson , or there in the southern direction to zaporozhye . it turns out that this is all a useless debate, because the decision was made clearly; the americans and the british are only interested in the sea. regardless of how strengthened the tampon positions are. will it be a frontal attack? oh, which, by the way, we later saw them this question is not at all of interest to them and they are not

interested in the issue of restoring territorial integrity and returning some territories. if only they were interested. they would say, listen, here we tried and it didn’t work. let’s try there, but they are not interested in donbass or anything; they are interested in access to the sea, attacks on ships. santa is also not a coincidence, because even today ukrainian experts are open. they say that in a few weeks ukraine will be forced to go on the defensive. and what city do you think needs to be especially strongly strengthened and defended, the city of odessa? they talk about it openly. they say, they are already openly saying that , well, the ukrainian army does not show any special successes, maybe this is against the backdrop of criticism that sounds in the world media, which allows them to do this, but on the other hand , adequate experts appear who say well , let's agree with the fact that you broke through

the first line of russian defense, let’s assume you broke through the first. well, what do you think, what is russia doing at this time? ukrainian expert, you have broken through the first line of defense. they have two more truths. yes, they are already building a third one there and you again. come hello, we are again on the first line of defense and we can move on like this endlessly, because in fact they don’t have the opportunity to bypass these lines of defense, as the west assumed, and the fact is that they are sending ukrainians to die head-on. this doesn't happen either, and they by and large. they kind of try this way. the continuation of this offensive, but in fact, they are already thinking about how they will organize defense, that is, they are already planning how they will organize defense, because they understand this is inevitable, that is, the potential of possibilities, at least at the moment with the balance of forces that they

have and with those , whose reserves remained in the continuation of this so-called counter-offensive. it is absolutely meaningless and cannot be implemented in that volume and in that understanding. as it all seemed, it actually doesn’t work out. these are the opportunities that experts now have adequately assesses the situation. i think this is also connected with direct criticism of zelensky and such fermentation within ukraine itself because no, no, but in political circles the issue is already being discussed that well, in fact, the americans are not going to bet on zelensky, you know for a dictator like zelensky. a very dangerous trend today. one said something to his address. tomorrow another person allowed himself everyone, so to speak, you can’t close everything off martha. and this trend is beginning to a certain extent gain momentum and the more criticism zelensky receives from his team. and this is connected

from uh, corruption with many other things. in fact, the more people will appear who will allow themselves to criticize the ukrainian authorities within ukraine itself, including those actions that are associated with mobilization with the code of implementing a counter-offensive and so on. today they are already openly saying that so wait , who is responsible for the fact that the best, as they say, the best trained forces were thrown not from a military point of view, but precisely from from a political point of view, bakhmut or artyom, well, who was responsible for this and all the penalties who is the main commander? it ’s he who, at his insistence, he needed to fly to perform in the united states of america and for this he needed to bring the flag there to promote himself. and for this reason , for a month and a half he sent and sent people there, essentially throwing them into

the furnace. this is his responsibility. you know, we discussed this. eh, just recently sociology. moreover, zhenya is here. i think, there will also be about this and when many people, one way or another, well, consider zelensky responsible for, uh, corruption. yes, and he is simply perplexed. well, how is it that his office is all fake, so to speak, polls, how is this , what does zelensky have to do with - a corrupt official. he doesn't understand one thing: monopoly of power. this is not only an opportunity, it is also a responsibility and any appointment for any corrupt official who is caught. it doesn’t matter where in the heart of ecology or in the ministry of defense or somewhere else? this is your set what zelensky did not understand from the very beginning, as a policy, is that responsibility can also be distributed, you know, transferred to someone under condition. if you collaborate and work with someone in a coalition. you have ideas that you want

to implement, but you have a partner that i would like to, but i can’t because i’m in a coalition. i also have certain limiting factors. he created a system in which he has no restrictions, no limiting factors, and therefore all responsibility due to failure the counter-offensive is due to a failure in the economy due to poverty and a poor country due to corruption. this will all be the responsibility and exclusivity of zelensky and no one else. he just doesn't understand it yet. well, let's try corruption for now and, in general, look what happens. here we are talking about corruption. i'll try to give an example. now everyone is discussing the topic, how important it is. what is this about? the executioner was just talking to the front man. i have one question for you. yes, look at the survey given by ukrainian sociologists they are discussing that 35 % of ukrainians agree that in the conditions there, there is a statement that in

conditions of war there is no need to criticize the authorities there and because these are, in general, western allies in some way. this is actually quite cleverly staged. possibly, may be long. this is a matter of your agreement or disagreement, a matter of approval. this is the most, well, such a normal form of conducting a survey and communicating with respondents, but here another question arises. listen when i look at its distribution by region. e on western in ukraine, 44 agree with this, 48 ​​disagree. well, listen, almost a parity position. next you but now ask yourself a question. everyone seems to be putting corruption at the forefront. listen, at the everyday level, corruption is total in ukraine. millions of people are involved in corrupt activities, ranging from leaving the army to crossing the border to solving some everyday social issues. it's not . uh, the topic that, in general, will excite the population or create some kind of preference for one or another political

power or criticize the form of a creature. yes, i just want to convey a very, very important point. she is in the background, she is far from the first, and in the elections she will not play or work at all. even those who are critics and supporters of the government. they say corruption, well, zelensky can’t do that, because people live in this paradigm. as my comrades say. yes, please, if zelensky had not come to power precisely against the background of the fact that i was not a systemic politician. i'm just a guy who doesn't participate, they all corrupt officials, and honestly, yes, your verdict is only acquittal, you know something. that is the question. he focused his attention on this himself, no one forced him, but that was the way it was then. and this is now and now, when it says, this service provided is no longer a servant, you know, and this topic, which was relevant 2-3 years ago, it does not work now. if some political force puts it

at the forefront, then it will lose. it won't do anything. people live in this situation. i say again, please note, i am not making moral ratings. you are right or you are wrong. listen, well, he’s scolding. well, in fact, why is the population’s attitude towards corruption negative, because it is a kind of social revenge? because you are going to power. a priori, you are deceiving people, and the fact is that people at no higher level should pay. there are those thousands or hundreds of dollars for you to do it again . look, they live in this and you think they will paralyze this, i beg you, but there is one very important one. they are always on this occasion merlin will be here in the corner if they put a win on the political for one simple reason, because they say, this is how you set up a system of corruption. you are forcing us to give you money that we are forced to give you, on the contrary. they are not saying that we are participants in a corruption scheme. they say you have built a scheme for yourself and are robbing us with this. of course, listen, look,

we have already brainstormed here about how to use and how unpleasant it is to consume this term. he can work with him once again underlining. well, i’ll just show how he lives, that is, his value, it is an ephemeral feature of a corrupt official. in nothing one corrupt official does not consider all corrupt officials. i agree. this is what zhenya says: of course, if someone prints in some constitutional document that zelensky stole a billion, that’s probably what it will be about. he won’t react, but if ben kolomoisky testifies as part of a criminal case that mr. zelensky directly took part in money laundering with me. e in the bank. well, i don’t know, zhen will tear him apart. just to pieces, you know? look, we now i just said how it works in my opinion. and what a reflection. and now look at the two things that will work unambiguously, what spyridon just

said unconditionally. this is a question about oligarchization - this is a process that is inevitable in these conditions and the political force that will put it at the forefront, if we assume again, we are all looking at it now, and i am essentially doing the same. not what you force. well, i’m kind of trying to say everything about the fact that let’s assume the elections are held , this is the number one topic. do you know what topic number two will be the topic of earth, because you missed it. i tried on one of the broadcasts tell you that the oklinsky institute made a very good smell, a us report from california on the earth in the spa of land in ukraine, so they gave such an assessment, what is it called the theft of land in ukraine there? well, in general, the long name boils down to the fact that they showed that practically, yes, they indicated a little more than in ukraine at one time before the war they said, 33 billion. million hectares of land are agricultural land and a significant part these lands. there up to thirty percent is there almost at ten companies, that is, relatively speaking, there and in which it identifies strangely as national corporations. this is

a sacred topic for ukraine, which goes to spiridon pavlovich kelinkar, who raised this topic here for many years in a row. i want to say that it was early ukrainian that this sacred fear of ukrainians, which yuri vladimirovich moshenko at one time tried to raise, worked, and a number of other politicians tried to raise it, but it didn’t work, because she was driven by the fact that this is not a people’s referendum. and what is this the issue has been turned around and the population, in principle, lives in completely different ways. i can say this is a topic that will be relevant if they beneath it here is the dry residue , imagine, uh, there is a huge one from work , the simplest one, when people come out and say. you write that our relatives are missing , they died. and you stole this money that you had to pay and zelensky used it to buy himself another house in italy. well, the wiring won’t tell you these things, of course, they built this scheme from moscow. and then the people will start. this is a very serious

conclusion. the people will say. here are our husbands fighting , our brothers and you. and you, where did you intercept the story now, we are talking now, if in this we simulate a situation where in conditions of war and this is all mandatory, the third point is mandatory, which will be if the fighting stops, then there will be an answer and questions to authorities. and so on. i really don’t envy many politicians, what you said is the most basic thing, because we said, well, what about corruption? well, there the earth even in this case, it is not important now. well, when the question is that there will be peaceful coexistence, then which ones will you enter into? in the power of zelensky why didn’t you sign a peace treaty in istanbul and why didn’t you answer putin well, do we need crimea , the british need crimea, the americans need us in crimea they hate us, of course, donbass in donbass hates us. they are with us,

what did you do for your stupidity? how many hundreds of thousands have you destroyed? how many hundreds of thousands of wounded and maimed. i also lost two territories, in addition to the fact that it was so and achieved something, a the russians have not yet launched a counteroffensive. and we're fucking crazy. and what will happen next? allow me one more phrase. and who did you do this for, nenka, or what, nenka? you ruined it. here we are also speculative in approaching this solution to the issue, but imagine if the americans say they will resolve the issue. they will be blamed on the ukrainian authorities. remember the story of saakashvili, that’s all that happens. they began to prepare the base, they say, what do you want, they don’t want the topic of corruption, they need it inside ukraine, this topic goes there to the foreign market absolutely what the americans will say, listen, well, actually they have done to you and decomposed the situation. they invested $111 billion. europe, that is, and they say, listen, you

have been fighting for a little over a year. and black, they fought, they will say very simply why carlson where are the money you just kicked out reznikov, he pops up in monaco. wow. yesterday the man was the minister of defense of a warring state. and now he’s spending his time in monaco. well, maybe this is an old photo. maybe he's somewhere else for you , but he's not on the front line with a submachine gun censorship is still there. people won’t talk about all the restrictions, but as soon as they ease. this pandora's box will open, and then no political aspects will work. you are his son. de danilov, where is his son? this is the same question that is asked all the time in ukraine, where is the husband of tymoshenko’s daughter? i saw what the ukrainian website writes, yes, they have it there, but they can’t touch it. they are where

the san francisco ambush spider runs around in california. well , this is well, i think these topics will become relevant as soon as the direction changes and we’ll start putting pressure on some other one, and as soon as it becomes clear that we won’t stop, vladimir polyaevich, then all this talk is just how they supported it. we want peace, so it is coming. let's negotiate with the russians vladimir vladimirovich the pentagon found, it turns out, the key reason today for the failure of the counteroffensive. and today, i was just looking through the washington post press around lunchtime, without specifically naming the pentagon source by name. he said, it turns out, when the pentagon was planning after all

they were planning a counter-offensive for zelensky. and this was in the fall. er, that means a simple year according to their data. uh, thanks to the sanctions imposed against the russian federation against the russian military-industrial complex. uh, the russians almost halved the production of weapons, primarily missiles, and based on these numbers they planned a counter-offensive. but it turns out that it has now been discovered that the russians somehow bypassed all these sanctions and are now firing one and a half times more of these missiles than released at the beginning. a special military operation and it turns out, now it turns out, what’s the problem? yes, that is, these are the russian sanctions that were bypassed. so, continuing the theme of weapons. what now, biden, what instructions did he give? yes, that is, by state, where the enterprises of the military- industrial complex of the united states are located. this means almost doubling production and immediately

ran into opposition from republicans, in particular in texas, a state that, well, almost constantly votes for republicans. uh, the republicans are in were used by the intricacies of legislation in the states and when biden said, there is an enterprise for the production of shells. e in texas and the governor's. wait. wait. what you do now is increase the wages for 150 workers at the plant, and then you will earn a lot of money from this and the state of texas will not get anything from it. we are not interested in this. here is my list of problems. and it would be nice for the federal government to solve these problems, and then questions arise. listen to the conclusion, just what you said, 111 billion were sent. and look, in this state, in this somewhere , there is a flood there somewhere there is a tornado. and when will you resolve these issues, and in general, mr. biden and your team, do you live for whom, for the united

states, for us citizens, for american taxpayers, or do you live for the team of some beggar, who are asking more and more and are now succeeding. not just a problem. some congressmen there say, listen , in my opinion, we need to divide the states altogether and to blue to red. well already known. there was already a topic. yes, let's do it. we’ll somehow go our separate ways just like that, you yourself want to help ukraine, you want to help them , but somehow you yourself, that is, this problem has now arisen and uh, let’s continue. this is what vladimir vladimirovich said: tomorrow there will be another significant meeting on the grain deal. tomorrow toltenberg will meet with stefanishina and ifonishina. this is our deputy prime minister of the ukrainian government for euro-atlantic and european integration, the character is quite interesting stefanishina, somewhere, starting from the age of 20, she worked on 40 rostov programs in

the united states of america, had very interesting contacts with the central intelligence department, and there is such an opinion. so i discussed with my comrades, including in kiev, what is siphonishina? well, it’s not like tikhonovskaya’s second option, because after all, tikhanov’s option is unsuccessful, but the fact is that seyfonishino is inviolable now in the zelensky government, this is a fact and she has regular contacts, both public and non -public, with stalkerberg and his entourage, therefore, perhaps we, in the person of the symphony, see in the future some more serious argument during well, we know there will be a replacement. that’s why i would pay attention to stefanina.