this is a russian woman, consciously drawn into the most dangerous political games. today, 50 years later. we can tell you something more. of course, it’s a situation, because well, it’s necessary. if he goes to the polls, then he needs to be kept. yes , you need to control the situation. well,

that's the task. this is the task, because, well, we tried it this summer. how many were shipped? how many were mobilized? well, now there is hysteria and there is no way out, neither zelensky nor the ears of the kibaidan. yes, they must somehow ensure this, so now they will throw everyone under the gun of everyone in ukraine whoever they can, totally, and the assessed states will be. uh, well, try to organize some kind of arms sweep. everything that will be available at this uh at this stage, but this is an extremely risky move and that’s why this is the second why pancakes because that’s all that’s you. well, uh, forcibly mobilized ukrainians and the removal of weapons, in fact, does not guarantee there. that there won't be any trouble? well, let’s say this front line, for such and such

a long period. but if they do, then the whole bet will completely burn out, and therefore it’s very scary, very scary, and so they can't say what they 're going to do they don't know, i don't know. yes , i don’t know of a non-strategic 3d solution, which also doesn’t exist. we talked about this, who will it be after all? well, on foot, someone will go, the choice is to go, or they will go in a wheelchair. this still doesn’t solve it either. but it's kind of adult. well, if the middle is the level, what should you do? now on this front , which has been deployed, they have pumped up hysterics, and heated up, and what if suddenly the last thing is very scary, curious, why did i start with the military history of the military ? finished, curiously, i let slip there. here really curious. this is the polish president. so he talked about nato, he

says, well, obviously, it’s true, we are strange nato could not agree with the admission of ukraine because the fifth article would mean that nato was entering the war. well, that’s why these are the circumstances. i think that ukraine reacted with understanding, but at the same time we must inspire and support ukraine , so washington’s nato will be washington’s. that’s where it will be necessary. for america to say that we accept ukraine. very interesting. well, that is, if america he will say that we are going to war with russia, he will say, he himself will declare america will declare war on russia in this way, then we are poles, well , we want this even under america . we are ready to give a damn about the fifth article and what it will say. if he had said it verbatim, if we had now accepted ukraine in line

, it would have directly meant war, literally. i ask washington in a year, what will change? only that america will give you all the order for a united war with russia and before it america asks for this, but i’m not even talking about what you showed about koenigsberg, prouter less. that's because the german spirit is being revived in a very predictable way. in this sense. between konigsberg, belarus and russia , mr. historius’s drop-dead formulation is simply drop-dead. hmm he probably wanted to show that, well, the kaliningrad region is not russia , he wanted to say this, because between koenigsberg belarus and russia means that the kaliningrad region is not russia . well, maybe you’ll start somehow not start taking it more seriously . e to the statements of these

comrades. here, and, of course, the right term last. yes, this is the german spirit in all its explained glory. she said because it just came out. well, that is, in the minds of a german, the concept of untermensch is completely itself, living and functioning so much that it can break out on its own, despite the prohibitions and its indecency. so, why after a year? because they expect to have completed hypersonic testing by this time and have not yet fully eliminated the strategic backlog. they will accept ukraine to nato the moment they understand that strategic nuclear weapons, they were equal to us. this is the moment. they will immediately accept ukraine. i think so because this is the only thing here?

well, they are pragmatic, it’s important to look not at the faces of these wretched people who pretend to make decisions, like blinkin and so on. pay attention to how much the level of analysis and understanding of russia has fallen. that is, when you consider what the highway says and everything else, that is, i don’t smoke, i don’t have any examinations, i fell enormously. they are needed. she is needed. they simply do not have reliable sources of information and do not have access to them access, because those who blow in the ears. well, in particular , people who saw putin a long time ago tried to write a psychological portrait of putin. they don't even understand what they're talking about, so they make mistakes over and over again. therefore, they do not calculate what our leadership will do and do not understand our people. in what sense did i say it’s not necessary? they definitely have a task. ay on the one hand to this clan. uh, wing. their task is to justify war and its inevitability. this is, of course, when you make plans. you must

understand the enemy, otherwise this one is making mistakes, what happened to them this summer andrey i would like to make a few comments like this there are no comments, just notes on what to say in the margins, but the first thing i drew attention to was another phrase, vladimir vladimirovich about that that we are developing weapons on new physical principles. and so, in a year, volodya may not be able to do it in time, if we manage to do the work, but the question here is that putin says that we are developing. otherwise it's already ready. well, for example, i don’t know, i won’t he he said in this regard it’s like this he will not interfere against, so to speak, hypersound is plasma and so on , but in any case such weapons were developed, so where at this stage, we are leaving the americans, i say, on the nineteenth i would not have left the wing 52, and on september 6 . they took off and changed. they canceled the strike on this poor qualin, then because

apparently there were problems with the hypermatologist. we can help, the second one said so, the second note is like this. well, i could give blinkin a hint. here was the classic phrase from charles maurice tel aran, yes, language is given to a diplomat in order to better hide his thoughts. that’s how he interprets it, as he said, you won’t understand anything. he hid his thoughts, if they were there and the third was the last one. well, i would say after boris gleb, the first russian saints with boris. we have some bad luck with russia. that ’s how godunov and yeltsin are and how they are economists from the eye. yes? so borisovich is what’s their name? yes, well here and here plato and pistorius pistorius.

suggest canceling the name. well, somehow it’s kind of bubbly, actually, i need to remind you you always say that we are historically, why did they leave paris in 1414? and why did we leave sberbank in 763? we were in kemer, actually, there was a russian general, a governor, a lover of women, general corf. well, well, in short, there was a russian army there. so we are not going to throw off now. i say that now it’s just königsberg, we have returned to our own territory, so what can you say, then it doesn’t change the russian city, so the fact that the famous dunes is, by the way, exactly came up with uh-huh well, because then he cut down all the forest there uh-huh in order to build stronger, but he was the inspector general and chief supply officer for his son’s son refused

refused to go into the fighting troops. i had to go. no, no, no, no, i won’t own the phrase that there ’s an intrigue every six months. yes, yes in a person, my, with the current form, so to speak, awareness , the majority went to the internet, as you know. yes, it’s always in the people’s republic of korea with the korean people’s democratic republic. we collaborated in the nineteenth year was the first visit of kim chennin, and before he came with his father to russia , the simple fact is that in bilateral relations there is always one more player, as if, perhaps invisibly, but this is always present. this is china and now, as it were, this reflection is that

a certain bloc is being formed in the eurasian space. this is what we are now entering into direct interaction, most likely vladimir vladimirovich will go there. of course, this will infuriate westerners greatly , infuriate, infuriate, because one by one simple reason. now, i’m not very sure that now, uh, the south koreans will supply uh, the americans will quickly replenish their reserves. it is clear that the ammunition reserves that are coming directly from the united states, which means they are going to ukraine, and especially , so to speak, to arm some european countries there, supplying k2 tanks or k-9 self-propelled guns, as they have pledged to do this for poland. yes, in principle, here already that's the immediate effect. this is for the united states. we'll have to keep it there , really trump let his down twice aircraft carrier group. well, to be honest, he didn’t intend to fight there, because uh, china is always looming behind korea or is it

a direct conflict. what dima said is a direct conflict with the people's republic of china. this is how it was before, this is how it was in the korean war, this is how it will be and now and therefore, it is important for the united states to exert constant pressure, and the most interesting thing is that history is connected with this . the european union has stated that they will impose sanctions against korea, and against north korea. i’m interested, what are their there are some kind of relations with north korea at all. there will still be food there, and sanctions will still be imposed. and what will these sanctions do to scare? kim jong-un? well, in my opinion, it’s more likely to make people laugh against him; he already sees all possible sanctions. he has ionian sanctions, he has sanctions from the united states, japan , south korea. well, in general, he has the whole set. well, there will be more european ones for the collection, but at the very end of the row of this space. it is clear that the united states they are trying to shake up our

southern underbelly and central asia and the southern caucasus, and this, to a certain extent, is our answer there, to seize the initiative there to yes. in the east, this is a very important point, in fact, i really think that if it succeeds and and i think that it will succeed, because hmm, but, in principle, an understanding of the interests . colleagues will say about china, of course, but an understanding of one’s own interests and with and uh transferring them to the eurasian continent with the interests of conjugation with the interests there, let’s say, china and russia have now developed not only for us, but also for the chinese leadership, because in china it turns out, well, for a long time , there was still hope there that you would be able to rule the situation has come, biden. we will reach an agreement now and end the trade war. that's true. china is not legally an enemy; it is in law with iran and north

korea. china does not yet have such a law against it, although it is a strategic concept. he is an enemy, and an enemy to the existence of the united states, i wanted more one thing to note about uh, the way our policy is carried out. i, sergei aleksandrovich, categorically disagree that we have always mastered were oriented to the east. yes, because our development was largely due to the fact that there were exiles there, and cossacks for the fur trade , by and large, but the rights of the program really began to be mastered. this is whatever you want, you can relate to nicholas ii. well , bam and the transib you were talking about this, there were projects. just couldn’t couldn’t implement them implemented transit was enough money. and then they borrowed money, well, foreigners , not americans, who wanted to go there, not the french, nor the british

, were not allowed to build the trans-siberian railway, they borrowed money. yes , they got into debt, but they built their own with their own strength. therefore, here the first major development began, then later, by the way, it was interrupted. bypassing lake baikal, the russo-japanese war could have had something else, well, the russo-japanese war. by the way, this is also the first program brezhnev tried to stop russia’s advancement. here's a woman. this was an attempt resume this program. unfortunately, this did not work out and now , from my point of view, putin is making a second such serious effort, a second program, because this is not the construction of the power of siberia. the first thing is that this construction began, against which eastern siberia is the pacific ocean. it was in 2005 that the first pipeline was built. that’s when, strictly speaking, it started and there was strong opposition to it. why do we need to go there ? we are a european power. we must be focused on europe and the rest is strength in siberia, this is already a continuation, and it turns out

that, in principle, high-speed trains will start running. so. here. i say that this development is a development, a whole development, serious development of technology in essence. it adds up. now, if you take all these efforts, it doesn’t all add up to a single program, it turns out that there ’s a far eastern hectare and so on, but i still don’t think that the undertaking itself was successful in relocating distant beings. no, i didn’t ask like that. start yourself. take the far eastern hectare. fine? have fun. now this is promotion and integration into a new center, which even the americans believe that the pacific ocean will be the new center of the world economy. clinton talked about, uh, centers of gravity, that in fact, from the atlantic we are moving there, so the south and north korean submarines can be placed there at several points, i can name them by name, where they can be placed; they don’t

need the hudson at all, that’s what you don’t want. well, why don't you just take the muddy waters of the potomac? start? from the hudson keep it simple. no, it's just that in connection, whether this boat is sailing along the mississippi in the united states, a new period of marctism begins. well, i mean kerry on mccarthy who wants to impeach his grandfather. okay, so. why should the victim of the 25th amendment be impeached? it won’t pass anyway. this is also humanism for the smart you are saying now, no no , i’m just the twenty-fifth amendment, whoever corrects him will be the twenty-fifth. sorry incompetent. the same incompetents are not realistic. what is he after what he did? still has to do to fall under the twenty-fifth amendment, faces 25 years, prison and a fine of $750,000

, a normal kid will come out all tattooed , there will be stars there, all the work, the cobwebs on his knees will start singing a normal song, at least on thursday they will start chatting under the social market for a quarter, as a pioneer star exactly. well, well, i didn’t pay more than $100,000 in 17, 12 months in prison so far on each count, as well as a separate charge for a pistol, which is off topic and taken there and it doesn’t accumulate the president of the united states and his dad is, so he will immediately forgive and pardon no, he will have little mercy, if the twenty-fifth amendment, yes, there will be no one even the twenty- fifth amendment. who can implement it very easily. yes, he can apologize himself. maybe he's done it twice already. it already came into force when the proctologist

dealt with him. and why does he have a simple one? and this, when i say, why the amendment? someone will promote this. the fact is that biden is unlikely to make it. why, then, to free up this space here, for real? yes, he doesn’t want to and he wants to rest, he wants to send him on a well-deserved rest. who will try and catch a cold at the funeral of your beloved kamaliyaharis? is this what it is? now, young lady, you are constantly promoting your favorites. well, let's show it especially for andrey. she will not be very political. of course, her beliefs and values ​​completely coincide with the values ​​of the president, but people don’t understand. she's very forward-thinking otherwise. why would she become president with a saw here, a couple more operations will not fly away from barbra streisand yes, yes

, this is more. the simple fact is that a week ago she already said little, and then she got tense because she is ready to replace joseph biden jr. at any moment. but she didn’t say that then. she said that she is ready to replace president biden at any moment, but she, uh, believes that he is still fully in shape in order to continue working, why did he need to say this phrase, in fact, he is seriously developing. why did you have to talk? she didn't even understand what she said. so they told her that say who benefits from removing it to no one. so why will there be a war, because there is not a single structure in the world, not a single interest group that did not need this war. everyone needs it, when the war is going on, it’s even close,

guys. i understand that you really want to. 15 rows of bombs, just a minute, well, every time you scientists argue at the level of politely speaking, not scientific analysis, what do you mean you want this is not a category, you want this category of historical analysis, it definitely has nothing to do with it. i want it or not you just need to see the long processes in this capital. unfortunately it is inevitable. and you can try to call regional conflicts war. they won’t start this war. that's right. unfortunately. whether you want to or don’t want to paint his horse and paint it, however, a regional conflict will still end up , called a big war. it's unavoidable. historical analysis, at least, shows that until now, with the advent of nuclear weapons, until they were used again every time they appeared, they were not used once every time, when certain news on weapons appeared, it was said, that’s it. this is so

terrible that war is now impossible. they were talking nonsense. when the machine gun appeared, exactly when, during the boxer rebellion, the fist, in the name of justice, to hell with all the great masters of kung fu, chopped off an incomprehensible english contraption and it became clear that you don’t have to spend your whole life on martial arts, such as from bare checkers to a machine gun, and andrey the machine gun, the consequences of its use, then humanity decided everything is known about nuclear weapons after chernobyl, fukushima is no longer no one has fear. wake up in the same tragedy and when you understand, everyone knows that it is inevitable, who should enter there, who should take this step is perfect , biden, he doesn’t care, of course, he’s old anyway, if there’s someone else there it will happen, you will have to tinker with it correctly, and you don’t even need to tinker with this, you can’t get it. i want to go back, first of all, to start from the

plot of prokliningrad and so on. this is revanchism for us, but in general, yes, revanchism. ah, on the other hand. what is it like when one country per eu member makes claims for a trillion, in my opinion, euros to another country against this eu member and germany is a member, and the founder of the eu and a nato member is not the least. well, it hints, at least in these words , to the story that what without the approval of nata in general with the bosses? they have some kind of territorial ambition, what is this all about, what, what is happening? ah, but it’s happening, and what has created the tire now is a unique situation that probably hasn’t happened for 780 years. the stars have fallen. this is this not good and not bad. that's just the way it is. and why did dovrov talk a lot about this with international law? and putin, in my opinion,

spoke out quite a long time ago. no, it was trampled there and destroyed; it doesn’t work. you can’t destroy one piece of the right one and the rest will work, it doesn’t happen. if it doesn't work, it doesn't work at all. moreover, they scolded blinkin for not really saying anything, here was a performance in john sip hopkins. actually said it. but he said that there is an order here that hmm was created after the cold war. i translate from the russian-to-russian order based on sent no longer exists. yes, yes, it means more, that is, and there is no order based on international law. and even the order that the americans came up with , they also have no order at all. no. what do we have with international institutions, but there is something that is not there at all. nothing, it doesn’t regulate the imf, instead of maintaining currency stability, it’s engaged in giving money to ukraine to other friends in the united states. yes, they’re not big caretakers, in my opinion. there are none, world bank, approx.

does the same. what else is there? uh osce organization of depot security cooperation. you haven't heard anything for the last three or four years. i think it's okay. well, after that, when i reported on hmm, there was information about the donetsk militias. uh, it’s generally difficult for the legitimate government in kiev to talk seriously about this organization, that is, in general, these mechanisms don’t work either. further, in the 70 years since it was after yalta, after giving up, what is called the balance of power has changed, yes, today's russia is not equivalent to the soviet union forty fifth year i don't evaluate it at all. you are just the other side of today's usa is not equivalent to the usa in 1945, if in yalta in the subdam no questions arose, as if who is, who and how much it weighs now no one knows, there is a huge uncertainty, no one really knows, who seems to be there. and who just seems, and, unfortunately, humanity in general

only knows one way, and that is to test it through war, through conflict, no other ways, until it is invented, which means we have to do this. and finally. uh, what else is there? uh colossal internal changes have occurred. we often talk about the fact that the generation that remembers the war after has passed away. the politicians who created europe , which remembers the war, are responsible, as if this memory is not only this generation is gone, even the generation that recognized and signed the helsinki act is gone. they are determined boundaries. they don’t exist either, modern guys are somewhere in poland. they say, what kind of piece of paper is this? who signed this anyway? why should we actually comply with this? it's some kind of attitude to have to us. by the way, there are some such discourses in russia, uh. i think that it is quite appropriate, because, well, yes, and the wrestler

nikolaevich is in a well-known company in golovets. more than anything, he signed it so that it was quite a long time ago. and this is something that still hasn’t been decided, like this, what was legal , what was, how justified they asked people, yes, for the referendum that was held, in my opinion, they gave a condom. yes, in my opinion, the opposite results. that's why here too and finally. ssonalism, well, we explain it in different ways as a reaction to integration, but globalization people. i like it when representatives of other cultures live there with them, and i like the cultural code, i like the economic situation and there are many things i don’t like, and how one of the reactions to this is nationalism. but nationalism no longer exists. likewise, we cannot simply say that we are idealistic and that there we are russians. we are poles, we are germans. here are the best ones. we need to find enemies, we need to start restoring historical justice and rebuilding, as it were, our own look at history. we have always been great.

it was as if we were being squeezed there for the last 150 years, well, that’s when this wave started, when now this is the moment that probably happened in the mid-thirties, when borders move, when the state falls and emerges, when they change rules when everything will be somehow different. what i mean by all this is that there can be no amicable agreement under these conditions, we have to fight and win , i have no doubt that ours will win, but i would like to. a pay attention, that means i won’t discuss it now. what this victory will be expressed in is endlessly discussed on all channels. everyone has different opinions, but we are having this conversation, but i would like for us not to repeat the experience, at least of the second world war, or even the first, when the sacrifice was made, we we were the winners, but the benefits were different. i would like it to be different this time, absolutely. in general, this is a feature, we win wars and lose the world and

regarding the image of victory and what victory is one thing the war did not begin with the understanding that there was a victory. it’s realistic, if you look at a single war russia has never waged, so that at the time it began it was clear that there was a victory; it’s then easy to read in a history textbook what this led to, but the realities of life completely different.