the mosfilm channel is the only channel that is a real soft power with such a number of views. this is real. really soft power must say that the soviet union could not achieve this. well, there was no internet then, and just for example , a few more numbers. for the twenty-third year the number of views is russia 225 million , ukraine 77 77 million are still watching ukraine

i think that in ukraine a lot of people would like to cover this thing up, since they covered everything, but they can’t do it, since they can’t close youtube , for example, the united states 13 million views germany 11 million. well, you know, these emigrants there will tell me, well, well, india has a lot of our migrants there 4 million. views mexico three, indonesia 2.5 great britain 3 million there are also, of course, mr. friedman and others there. perhaps they are looking at our films. well, i suspect that in many countries . and this is colossal, as they say. this is south korea, half a million in 23 years, switzerland 400,000, norway 360,000. latvia

four more than four and a half million, latvia which closed everything. but this cannot be closed. in short, what am i saying this for, i think that this is in general, but there is no material gain. we don’t have one today for the reason that first there was a special operation by youtube. it stopped all payments and removed advertising, so look at your health. this is now all without advertising. this is freely available and thank god, so naturally not in mosfilm. moreover, they have no material benefits, but in my opinion. that would be quite. as the saying goes about his sword. this is in my opinion, because i repeat that this is essentially the case. the only real channel now that has something, at least something. in general

, enough influence. e to the world. as they say, the public is the audience, and i repeat. even ukraine has 77 million views per year. for - for august. well, there i have august almost 10 million views, well , you know, this speaks to ukraine, in general, we talk about a lot of things, uh , unfortunately, no one here even studies at all for me. i don’t know what russian film studies are doing there, does it even exist? or it’s just there in the zone where they write some rubbish, but because in general we have full statistics. she is very curious, because we see the number of views for each picture. age, so to speak, mass city cities where countries cities, that is, very interesting statistics for all the time, not a single one who did not apply, at least

let me see, it’s actually interesting, because there are interesting things there in general. well , for example, it must be said that those films that are very popular here, strictly speaking, are absolutely unpopular in foreign countries. ivan vasilyevich is popular. well, other films, well, that in itself is very interesting, war films are very popular. here is a war film in the far abroad. they practically occupy the first positions, there are eight positions. uh, in our segment it's more of a comedy. well, these are the things. these are just analyzes very well for analyzes very much for logical for film studies. well , as they say, not one of them. as if to say , i never paid attention, what to give them to see, we will give, please, in the shower. and this is curious, but in any case, i would ask those competent authorities that will make certain decisions regarding

youtube weighed in, including taking this part. as they say, for their analysis it is worth just a candle. i understand that on youtube there are, of course, such hostile materials, but uh, so to speak, this is the moment, and our collection, mostly soviet, people watch especially when driving. they fought for their motherland, you understand, that is, these are, uh , our best pictures, as they say, therefore , i would just like this to be possible for our deputies, dear if it arises the discussion was remembered. this is why, in order not to make some kind of hasty decision that we made. frankly speaking , and as they say, here we probably need to weigh the union carefully now, but on the essence of the current one. well, this is, of course, uh, the speech of the gentleman. oh, well, this is

amazing, this is a parasite on what yes, what is here, well, right putin absolutely correct letter. i wrote that what is wrong here is that the main thing is indignation. what, what is the problem with what you said? well, base move which one you you promised not to install it at all after the ninety- first year, which you gorbachev admitted you won’t expand at all. well, well, even you can leave these countries in nato, but it is not necessary to keep your armed forces in these countries, which is not true here at all, and this is presented in full on the blue itself as something like, they say, how dare russia, in general this raises this question parasitic impudence, but

this is what i think, of course, you understand. i recently watched the program of your colleague, a very good one, and now i brought him too, decide dmitry simes. i was there with him too, she was very curious, he did an analysis of the relationship. at the level of diplomats, using the example of dobrynin, our famous outstanding ambassador to the united states, where he talks about the situation back then. well, there was conflict in everything, but at the same time he showed his granddaughter what was good. eh, the cute one invited me. she shows photographs of dobrynin while meeting with women who have the most inveterate russofian syndrome, it seems that they are even friends despite the fact that they have, that is, relations within the diplomatic communities, despite the strongest conflicts,

and then and then the war in afghanistan , all kinds of these, but they were still correct. they were correct. they still had some kind of relationship. by the way , in my own way, by my own example. she said that her father worked as an international specialist. he was involved in socialist countries, but, naturally, he also communicated with this. well, they really were correct, that is , strictly speaking, all these western diplomatic corps are quite one thing , well, another thing is that they have relationships, so to speak. and it allowed people to negotiate to some extent, there was always some resource in order to prevent extremes. today this is not there at all, that’s all. she disappeared completely, that is, scholz may not say hello. with laurel. but then this is the eighties during the war in afghanistan, the reaction. the west was very harsh

about the olympics, they boycotted the olympics. this is the eighty-third year. i remember the korean boeing plane for some time and the messages were closed, but it was still we communicated anyway. still, it was an element, like a game, in which everyone took part. today. it completely disappeared. this is really brought to the situation absolutely. i would say everything realistic with this forbidden toilet paper machines and so on and so forth, well, what does this mean to me, what's the difference? what's the difference? it seems to me that my assumption is what we have talked about a lot, because you and i are lovers of conspiracy theories, yes. that’s right , we believe that this is quite real. objectively , the reality in politics is conspiracy theory, but they didn’t believe us all the time, you know, all the time it was believed, well, that’s all, so to speak. nothing

personal only business, they say. the west, no, at that time the west did not set itself the task of destroying the ussr, so the task was not set , so the whole complex of relationships within, as it were, the establishment of the soviet and western, especially american, was preserved, despite all the terrible contradictions , the war in vietnam, afghanistan and all that . well, there was no question, but today in my opinion. this is exactly how the question stands, the question is that, as they say, they delegate our country to take advantage of the current situation. you will take advantage of the fact that, in their opinion, after the collapse of the ussr, russia is still weak. she won't stand it. and this is a question, that is, the destruction of the country to solve this issue once and for all is

in no way understandable. uh, it's still political summer. in many ways, our country is not going away. i think, yes, at the presidential level it is obvious that everything has already been included in this. it is clear that here i have the feeling that he understands this danger very well. and this, well, is the political elite, just like the elite in general. she can't imagine it. this is a conspiracy theory. what is the theory of obscurantism? these are the famous obscurants. this is obscurantism. these are scoops. yes, these are the ones who still read the newspaper. it is these modern people who are known as obscurantists. yes, yes, yes, yes, people, you understand, but this is reality, oh, which must be understood and accepted, because if you don’t accept this, you don’t know the extent of

the struggle that lies ahead of you. you don’t know the extent of your responsibility and the extent of what you need to do in order to win the struggle or at least not lose, because really, well, this state. here it is in the elite, still not this me. i’m watching the speech of the head coach of the russian national team, mr. karpin. after a brilliant match in quotation marks with qatar, which again ended 1:11, what the head coach says, the players are not motivated. and in general, it’s like they don’t care, but he needs to leave here, and he’s not here. they have no chance here. listen, well, mister. by the way, i don’t want my words so that now he’s being hounded there and all that, but you explain to me first. the first is the motivation of the players. yes, it is the direct responsibility of the coach. this is

one of the chapters. just like the motivation of the actors is direct. as they say , it’s a coach’s job, if you have unmotivated players, then you haven’t done something that we know as an example of motivation, when the great tarasov is there and the second point. well, how can a head coach encourage his players to leave the country? today, how is it, maybe? i admit that he said this out of emotion. i don't know him like the coaches. although judging by the results. i remember him back then he was fond of football and was a good athlete. maybe it's emotional. but it seems to me that this is well-mannered. this is how the elite lives. this is the understanding. this is the understanding of the situation. there is a very large part of the elite that remains the same, you understand, and it doesn’t interfere. and it is pronounced

when we see. young people, our fellow citizens, are losing the arms and legs of life. well , at least a basic understanding that the coach must educate the player, because the coach is an adult, and the player is young man, and i remember tarasov there, i remember tikhonov, who not only got players, but also raised them. well, it seems to me that you kind of need to somehow understand this understanding in yourself, if your homeland is in danger, it’s in danger, it’s like a mother, if your mother is in danger, then no matter how you treat , do at least something to save her, because everything else is dishonest. therefore, i would like to

somehow bring this to our players in sports. and you and the athletes we hear a lot about how tragic it is that they were brought up there, but now they can’t participate. and by the way, we in cinema also cannot participate in non-international ones. as they say, competitions are about nothing and what? well, something has to be sacrificed at some point , nothing can be done about it, by the way, speaking of athletes. for a football fan, this is a handsome whole volunteer unit fighting with valor, a number of football players and famous guys volunteered. so, well , the wholes are very different. well there we go there are several dozen, if not essentially , guys who practice martial arts, among whom are very famous athletes. we went to the battle line. contacts are at war. so we won’t

say it very precisely. i remember now, yes. it’s interesting , but it’s 1941 there. athletes formed the backbone of a number of nkvd units; they didn’t say ugh, no, no, that’s it, we must leave. we need to wait somewhere. we've been preparing all our lives. and now what not? they walked and fought. something is somewhere here in the conservatory, someone is not catching up with something, but we ourselves are to blame for something, probably for the fact that we entered their position so deeply, well, without a flag. well, okay, no worries. well okay. come on, andrey is there by the way, that’s right. you said it many years ago, and you said it, but here you and andrey were absolutely yes at one. well, the main thing is that they still know who they are. we were gradually eaten up , piece by piece, and we noticed only when it simply became clear that that was all, though again. yes, not everything is still

great. you and i were talking about this back then, in your own studio, that on our i think it’s a mistake to speak out, you can’t do it at all. by the way, then they would still be there, because after all , russian athletes would not participate. it would be strong because it was necessary to become tough. to hell with advertising contracts, all the companies that are trying to boycopy from here, drive them away with filthy brooms. you always had to make gestures. but this is eternal. well, come on, well , a little bit, this is all elite brought up for 30 years, when we stop well, now i hear all these phrases. so what are we doing? well, how , how is this the un security council, what are you talking about? ok should we have checkers or should we go, well, should we win or that's cheese manners. this is an important question. well , now i think there is no such aspiration anymore.

now this week there will be high politics in the united states. well, in general, the general assembly and the security council of five representatives are constantly uh, only one will come as senior leaders, and then, i’m not sure. this one. everything will come, yes, yes, and maybe he will send kamal. it would be more fun to look at her, but still. this is why un relations are a rudiment. not even the previous world order is not the one that we have now, but the previous ones. i, karen georgievich, don’t agree with me here. one thing is that there was no task to destroy the soviet union. it was there, it was even in the first in the first concept that was put forward after the second world war, which formed the concept of containing the kenan. well, kena was already there talking about what was needed. we are fighting. it is true that the united states is always fighting a great evil. they fought with german and, accordingly, japanese historicism. yes after

this is why they fought communism. but this must be tied to what it was tied to, territorially tied to the soviet union , initially propagandized, because the american people in 1945, how did the russian people develop and suffer from domination? communists hmm, we need to be released about us. well, this is very similar to german propaganda, german propaganda, don’t believe the russian soldiers there, the jewish commander, damn it, here and there, uh, the bolsheviks are not here, after all, there are no bars, so to speak, such things, as if i didn’t miss it, they’re just suffering from hell communists. then they would free the whole world from communists, and then they would crawl to the soviet union. and then they would go on to the concept of simply direct military interference. there are plans for firewood, that you everything else is the destruction of the soviet union. and by the way, speaking, the concept worked, the soviet union did not, but then

when it developed. you are correct and absolutely speaking. that's when people could negotiate because there was an alternative. if the americans offend me now, i will go to the soviet union, here the soviet is offended union well, the third world is between the two first and second worlds. he was hanging out there, basically, that’s the main thing. they didn’t resist, but now they don’t. it's installed. after the ninety-first year , a world order was established in which one victorious power dominated in the united states. there is no need to negotiate with anyone. not with any europe . so stoltenberg is absolutely right. and, as a matter of fact, he draws the line that was outlined for him, and he really is indignant for him, as someone will not look may dare. he can’t be indignant about europe and how anyone dared to put something up. listen to the russian, you fit in , you fit in since the ninety-first year. and now let’s go like this, when we need to put pressure on china. it’s clear that there will be

indignation, damn it, i was just picturing that it’s on the order of this american pax after the cold war. he disappears cleanly. this is the end. only he painted it a little differently, that it was a world of stability and economic interdependence. the world of human rights development this is how he presented it that now russia and china are violating this benign picture of the world under the leadership of the united states, which works according to un rules - this is a rudiment, a system that is bipolar, which is yalta-substana. yes, this is where they are on this site. it was possible to exchange some things. in the end. the first thirty-one resolutions that were adopted. the un security council prohibiting resolutions. these were resolutions introduced by the soviet union, because the soviet union was, well, practically in

in the security council he was alone against a seemingly imperialist encirclement. it is clear that taiwan occupied the position of the west, namely, it arrived there then, and this has played a role now. well, in general, he may not pay attention. as a matter of fact, they missed it. this is not korea in 2006 for the first time. and i carried out a special test, but i don’t take into account the year 1974, when india carried out the device, but when they detonated the bomb, 1978, as i remember now, april mile, first india then pakistan, there was a gap of a week, which is more likely, by the way, i also tested the device. yes, yes, well, what happened, the united states introduced sanctions according to the presler amendment and immediately there in the amendment. there is a point: you can postpone it for six months and then presidential decree after decree. well, this is automatically signed, ab-depositions are sanctions for another six months. in the end , they agreed and quietly peacefully recognized the status of these powers. why, strictly speaking,

cannot we act this way towards korea? that we are here now, that we are now here violating what the united nations does not i think that we need to get out of it, we need to fight. she needs to be taken out of there. what is needed is for her to move to the united arab emirates, i don’t know where, in saudi arabia or somewhere else in any other country, but also the united states. yes, it was an agreement that existed between stalin and roosevelt and the rest there was not much it was accepted that american soil would be located and that the united states would invest funds for the maintenance of this united nations organization. now there are other countries that, strictly speaking, they can pay much more and build better buildings on another territory, so of course it is necessary to leave the united nations organization but, of course, transfer it. this is what is happening now with korea and the american one, of course, the assessments are very contradictory. on the one hand , two solitudes met, that is, two

isolated leaders of two isolated countries , completely isolated, russia has been isolated for a long time, korea. so they met, and on the other hand. well, guys, if you encounter two loneliness, why are you immediately in next in the next paragraph. write that this meeting should not take place because it violates the entire rule-based order. well, somehow there must be some kind of logic, if they are already isolated, they will quietly die there in their isolation, or you will fight it, it turns out that no, it hit. it hurts. scratched. this is what evgeniy petrovich told his father; he fundamentally disagrees with evgeniy petrovich. no, what no said with this prize money. let's make it official buy shells. and i think, let's go ahead and buy officially public ones. let people bring them. let those people use them. here some fool says that the slaves are in the shooting range.

what slaves? what everything should be rebuilt not by slaves, but by free north korean workers , infected czech children, bringing it to life. moreover, to rebuild not only lvov ivan frankovskaya, but if warsaw hangs like this, then warsaw will be rebuilt correctly, and so in the fifty-first year there was a partisan detachment, yes, there are two in korea. well then there were chinese small to a million people in the middle. there are one small parties, partisan detachments. no, in principle, we need to develop it, because we actually need to develop relationships. this is possible and you can accept them advertise you know in china lives korean russia north korea ends up more than a million people in japan these others. but this is not. japan is also a north korean childhood. i understand, this is another series of korean diaspora. here , the right-minded people live in china,

who are tuned in everywhere. che- through her, well and it does the right thing to us, it does the right thing, it does the right thing, and we can have a small korean diaspora here. you can not come out of anywhere, no resolutions are needed, but there is no going out in some places, but in some places you have to go in somewhere, yes, kiev lvov i ’m in french odessa nikolaev here ismail i’m lvov i’m here you again like to throw yourself away, why are you throwing this around like odessa nikolaev - we’ll definitely go, oh my, because filming in lvov would be something that wasn’t ours, that it wasn’t ours at all.

somehow it’s not ours with the rovenger one. let let it be that it’s not yours with this. i agree. let us remind you, the population of lemberg before the war. by the way, yes, any war, i ’ll tell you this. in this regard, we can compensate, therefore, the situation that is developing now, about which he said , damn it, yes, indeed, they now blinkin admitted that they are fighting for the order that arose after the ninety-first year and what with it we need to end things in order. this is, in my opinion, an obvious question for this purpose. we must say our goals absolutely correctly. we must at least postulate this officially. we must postulate this. they think yes, but we can’t even formulate for ourselves what we are talking about now. although de facto we are taking all the steps. this is the same

brix, but we just can’t formulate that we are, by and large, entering an era of no longer eccentricity. and we are trying to translate brix into the language. and for us, priorities are obviously changing now. well, volodya, i think that these are the latest events that happened literally in august. in september. keep our diplomacy running small, well year for 100 euros then it turns out that it was a diplomatic thought. it will follow the events, they will precede them, but we need to generally formulate how we see the new international this is the device. today we are talking about a just world. what organizational forms - this is a just world - exist within these forms. which could be, because in fact, what brix did was amazingly worded. yes, we do not recognize the sanctions that the brix countries say in relation to each other. they didn’t pause, because the only sanctions they could

appear officially only there, but create a certain space that is not recognized, and then you can translate. this was important, just as i liked the way the brazilians dealt with this international criminal case, when at first the president said that these are putin’s guarantees. i don’t have the right to go there , you know, and we’ll just get out of there. oh, well, we need to, no, we need to collect. in any case, the vision of this is fair, it takes time. never land a person who has challenged himself. i fly wherever the wind blows, fedor konyukhov

you have a storm front ahead. you walk straight towards him. this is a super cyclone killer cyclone. it ’s like he’s chasing you, i’m writing a letter, and then, when he returns, i give him mine, and he gives me his daddy. i love you when your dream becomes the meaning of life and you have come to terms with it. we would not have reached the pole then. i ’ve been working towards this all my life, because he’s the only one like that. we got used to watching videos, stopped working , install, open, watch russian channels and all movie series and cartoons , educational programs and documents.