Skip to main content

tv   RIK Rossiya 24  RUSSIA24  September 18, 2023 4:30am-5:01am MSK

4:30 am
you have a storm front ahead. you walk straight towards him. this is a super cyclone killer cyclone. it ’s like he’s chasing you, i’m writing a letter, and then, when he returns, i give him mine, and he gives me his daddy. love you. washed away, the father says, all the people have resigned themselves. we would not have reached the pole then. i've been going towards this all my life. we are all with him because he is the only one. the wind lord the enemy made him an ally soon. we got used to watching videos, it stopped working , we install it, we open it, we watch russian channels and all movie series and cartoons educational programs and documentaries
4:31 am
. there is a speech, there is probably both an objective
4:32 am
and subjective side, the objective side is that he doesn’t really understand. how did andrianovich burn about this, how in this unipolar world, how are there still such phantom pains? why in this unipolar world does anyone even dare to say where to expand and where not to expand is a subjective country. it’s just that you can be indignant at this, at least competently and in such a way as not to arouse sympathy towards the leadership russia doesn’t even have the ability to at least do this at a qualified level ; it seems to me that this is the result of the negative selection strategy that has existed in western political elites for quite a long time and when the goal is to find the most loyal people as leaders, and those who have no competition you can’t imagine the united states of america, then in moments of crisis. these people show themselves the way stoltenberg showed himself, or the way history showed itself in general, i read it with such interest. the conference was dedicated to the anniversary of
4:33 am
the peace of westphalia and the pistoria will burn. now, in the current conditions, it is much more than we can learn to kill an idol, especially the ability to find compromises. i read with interest, because one of the results from the fahlian world is that the hierarchical system of international relations, in which the emperor of the holy roman empire of the german nation means, ceased to be superior to other monarchs and was actually already equalized with the kings of european monarchies. there are a lot of parallels that can be drawn. the modern world, where there is one hegemon, and which, apparently, should be given this role in the future. as for other statements? i would say urban's statement is, of course, very interesting with regard to the grain deal. i know on the one hand refresh your memory refresh your memory good quality. we have imports of ukrainian grain, when
4:34 am
we were defeated by the people of brussels to let in by land poland hungary-slovakia, bulgaria romania those who are neighbors of ukraine grain that was sent from ukraine by sea, saying that if it doesn’t get from ukraine to africa, there will be famine, but in the end we were deceived. it turns out that we are exporting grain from ukraine , but it does not reach africa here in europe , having cheaper grain than hungarian, romanian and polish grain. instead of buying our grain, it begins to buy cheaper ukrainian grain. but poor african children don’t see, not a kilogram of bread comes from this, so this is a fraud in the face and that’s why we fought in brussels so that ukrainian grain could not be transported to the central countries europe remained. here we have to fight such battles with brussels every day,
4:35 am
because brussels is simply not ready to take the side of the state and peoples of europe and everyone seems to have other interests in this grain issue. this is not the european world , romanian, not polish, not hungarian, not slovak, but rather american interests. and about american interests in this context. even before this, he said directly that in fact america is dealing with grain in ukraine and when brussels hmm refuses to renew ban on the import of ukrainian grain to european countries. he is actually playing along with the americans in this, but in connection with this refusal, i want to extend the ban. pay attention to what comrade lieutenant general said, that as soon as someone takes the initiative, as soon as something does not go according to plan. we don’t want the structure to quickly begin to collapse. look , the european union did not extend this ban; individual countries began to extend it. eastern europe and this began to cause. these are
4:36 am
the sharp contradictions and conflicts with each other western europe with eastern europe euro. bureaucracy of local countries. this is a very good indicator for us. a very good example of what we need to achieve on i need to achieve. the actual absence of any consensus within the european union and its institutions so that countries make separate decisions then on the one hand. this will cause a conflict between them, on the other hand , it will allow us to use ours more effectively. sorry image repressive apparatus exit relationships. that there is, so as not to spread restrictions on all european countries at the same time, but to give them a choice to tell the guys. look, which of you will refuse, maybe we’ll give you something cheaper, maybe somewhere there will be some bonuses, who, separately, will lead something against us over the head of another option. no, choose this choice for you, because the current situation is for them. it's very comfortable. eh, a picture of the world that, unfortunately, we ourselves often feed when we use
4:37 am
the words european union, or the west, here we are we say the west, this implies that they are something united and it is very easy to hide there, separately, the czech republics and poland taken by slovakia, there and so on, if we talk specifically about individual states of the european union, in general, for all time we don’t really understand who they are and what level of legitimacy they possess, then we can. at least manipulate this space. we collide their interests in order to create at least some degree of conflict there. create now i also want to touch on trump’s very important statement, who said that the next election will be decisive, because either the marxist tyrants, fascists and communists, will win, or the freedom-loving and god-fearing americans. they will achieve victory, i mean their supporters. well, as far as i know, in the american tradition , almost everyone is called a marxist. even the left, there and liberals, anyone, but the presentation
4:38 am
of this nature of a sacred sacred confrontation is quite interesting, because i, of course, doubt that the next election will become decisive history. usa, i don’t think it can be at all. the day is determined by the minute and hour in transformations of such a huge scale, but the fact is that we are no longer talking only about clashes between individual groups of the elite, and that this conflict goes far beyond it. this is me, i think there is no doubt about it, and look, i want to draw attention to two things. the first is because trump uses his own political language very uh, absolutely independently, he doesn’t oppose he doesn’t say that there are too many democrats there. freedom we like the conservatives will come, and we need to restore it there. he understands that it is difficult to speak with such language, probably with the american voter. he calls them tyrants, and calls himself freedom-loving people, using the word fear of god.
4:39 am
that is, this is a new, apparently ideological platform that is emerging, which i think will bring big changes to the american party system in the coming years, and it is working quite successfully for him, as far as i ’m concerned. and the second thing i also want to draw attention to is, because in fact there is talk about the cultural survival of the united states of america and this, in general, is the only and key condition for the preservation of civilization. as such, if in the united states those forces that associate themselves with the globalists succeed in promoting their agenda, they succeed in carrying out this cultural suicide, then no nuclear weapons charges. no company armed forces will help them. this civilization of reality will cease to exist and it is necessary to understand here that you know, a parallel can be drawn between the works of the classics, which they described this cultural suicide even simply with human life, when here is an individual person. eh, from very difficult
4:40 am
conditions of poverty, cold, hunger, he achieves something on his own. there, winning some kind of authority and respect creates a fortune, and his children, in general , are growing up in completely comfortable conditions, and if they do not go through similar tests, then all this very quickly dissolves, in their selfishness the desire to waste their lives and have fun. and this is what we are dealing with civilizations, our civilization. i don't i know by the will of the lord or circumstances just turn out that way. we go through trials every 20-30 years, every generation in our country goes through trials, which after that allow our country to maintain the title of a great world power and the state of civilizations. and i will conclude with this. you said several times that we while we are speaking in the old language, comrade lieutenant general, said that these are many institutions. these are already
4:41 am
some kind of anachronisms that are necessary. these are all questions of ideology, that is, the vision of the world around oneself inside it is external. i think that the peculiarity is that ideologies arise when there is a demand for them, when there is a demand for it. that is, and if marx tried to describe the calculation of the means of production and exploitation, it means the proletariat in the middle ages. this would not be very relevant, because then there was no proletariat there as a class or if john locke was in the uh in the yard, there were egyptian pharaohs tried to describe the concepts of human rights and the social contract, too, probably then it would not have been very in demand. we probably owe it to ourselves. to be honest, partly in the nineties our population probably wanted to believe that a world was possible in which it would not be necessary to live in conditions of confrontation, in which we could integrate into global humanity together with americans
4:42 am
and europeans and travel to each other. visa-free regimes, bank cards that work everywhere and cheap travel packages. i think the first signals were when it became clear that this was not entirely true. this yugoslavia and then step by step, when we saw that in this world there really are no security guarantees. there is not even any desire to build , at least all, some kind of common architecture, but there is a desire only and exclusively to impose the will of one state, than to others , the population’s requests for it gradually began to form a little bit. well, we get answers if we read our concept of foreign policy and let’s say we tried to present it to the public 20-25 years ago. well would you say, who is this anyway, how is this possible? this is the century you live in now for our population and for our elite. to a greater extent
4:43 am
, this concept, which was presented further in the internal sense and in the external sense, is already acceptable and receptive. you are right to raise the question about how it will be organized. uh, international cooperation international relations has been formalized. no there in the future. well, let’s say, after the second world war. well, let's say mexico city is a good country, but it not in the security council. why because they were on wednesday, holding the winner, she did not show herself there in this field and until our partner france thailand and directly. well, it’s already clear that there were diplomatic tricks, including those of our country, that they wanted to see there, uh, that these states wanted to see there. unfortunately in the current conditions. eh, not all of them deserve it, of course, but until china, india and many of our partners begin to play an active role in this confrontation. we are pleased that there they applaud and say, come on guys. we understand you very well, we are not giving advice.
4:44 am
we need to help and participate financially and beyond our means. well, then it’s architecture. i think the advertisement will be visible now.
4:45 am
at the end of this week, i went to the front line with colonel vital teryokhin , the commander of the legendary 150 motorized rifle idrid berlin order of kutuzov flag division, which at one time developed by three hundred and managed to estimate its firepower. our artillery, talk to the soldiers, take participation in rewarding those who have already distinguished themselves in battle. let's watch the film, then return to our studio and continue.
4:46 am
well, yes, it hasn’t been long since i graduated from the academy and now i’m here, well, somehow i immediately appointed such a serious appointment to such a legendary division. it must be absolutely excellent. how did you enter the ryazan school in 1992 before the academy of the general staff of all airborne forces? and then a distribution proposal arrived. i think such a worthy and legendary sin division cannot be commanded. well it became famous the fact that its flag is not rekhtagi. i understand everything correctly. yes, you won’t get anywhere everywhere.
4:47 am
you're eating your flak. so the questions now are: where will the flag come out? well, where she is from above, he will order him there and we will place him there, of course, on the capitol would be nice. well, yes, the russian border does not end anywhere. i like your idea. this is strange, comrade colonel, a school with two a's. labor and physical education already have a red diploma in admission to the kremlin, well done. fourth but how long have you been here?
4:48 am
a little less than six months. well, you can't say that i didn't have to work for long. it has its own specifics, and in contrast to airborne troops. infantry. well, in principle, at the academy they studied it in practice. i had to apply this, we are constantly learning and improving, i acquired a lot of things for myself that i didn’t even suspect that such things could be in the organization of the information transfer department, they have stepped very far from the fact that the last time i left the troops before the academy. now i was really pleasantly surprised that this usually happens with us . soldiers who have been fighting there for a year already and in principle, there is no need to say anything, an unmanned reaction using a quadcopter.
4:49 am
well, there are people who came, like volunteers, they were doing this in civilian life and they tell exactly such things, i even see how this one, that is, every day we teach something new to a lot of guys, we have to train them, well, we train, of course, so that and not comes through the training ground for everyone then x- for coordination. how long does a person need to be kept at the training ground before they can be allowed in? well, if they are here in the reserve regiments preparing for themselves a month, we are not practicing, well, not less than two more weeks. trembled, vladimir where to hit the equipment somewhere, just to knock it down. well, what do you have to do with it? but this is what you worked on, right? so grandpa isn’t ashamed of you, he’s not
4:50 am
ashamed of me, there are rewards, but for courage? well, they shot down a su-25 plane, when about two months ago, yes, they shot down the plane there, and in order to hit 1 shot of a man-portable air defense system, the probability of hitting the plane is 0.05, at a minimum. even launch three missiles to ensure that the target is hit. the rocket reached its target, what is the specialty of the citizen? i generally i am working on a granary hangar. this is what it is, that is, we are mainly building construction. i’ve had it for how many years now, 20 years; it doesn’t take much to set up. at first i built turnkey houses. these are the ones i just went over a little bit. these are the hangars. we're building you won't win, well
4:51 am
, of course, you won't win. well, the action is according to a single plan, the defense will be told to perform. so we will be enemies. they say every time that andrei took all the ticks. now we’ll cut off the group, the semi-encirclement surrounded by the fort will blow, it will stand again there are magnets right there, and crimea will be taken away from azov. it’s not just my division that has a group there or they. well, it’s hard to say. we learn in our own way. they are trained according to some other standards. well, i want to note
4:52 am
that the enemy also reacts to some of our innovations, but accordingly, we also do not stand still. the same officer is sitting there, who, perhaps, even graduated from our military school in the soviet union and taught us the same in spirit. maybe he’s even the same as we used to be, brothers one people. and now why then did we win? but because it cannot be any other way, firstly, we have potential. the military potential, the economic potential, is not comparable to the ukrainian one. even though all western countries support more than 50 of them there, and they collectively, of course, surpass us. but they won’t do all this all the time. they knocked out this enemy equipment, how long will they last? well, we'll knock it out again.
4:53 am
only we produce it; ukraine itself does not produce it; there are practically none left. well, they succeed, it’s also an experience that turned out to be negative results are also a result, but here we are planning, and they are planning others. yes, the americans, apparently, this is not very much the case. well, we understand after all on the monitor screen, it looks different. how it was transmitted , in principle, is what has a significant impact. comrade colonel , the enemy unit of the 79th separate air assault brigade continues
4:54 am
to hold its positions, the main efforts are focused on preventing the advance of units of the 1st army corps the 20th and 150th motorized rifle divisions , moral and political psychological state, optimal combat floor, ready. loud on you well done. special for this. thank you, but it’s nice when you arrive soloviev shows this guys. thank you appreciate it. that's right, well, take care of the main people. but take away the populated area, but there aren’t many, it seems like there are only a few kilometers left, even a little less, around 750. this is what your kulibina yes, they are supplying me now, and also the volunteers themselves are collecting them too. we have buckets. something about the chimera in my opinion. yes chimera
4:55 am
the sixth, which they give us as standard. who is there standing opposite 79 separate? prepared prepared famous flag, right? what does it feel like when you realize that it’s yours? well, this is a feeling that not everyone can experience, that this one is in the reichstag. this was the flag. and now commanding this formation is worth a lot, so not a step back. well, about the word backward, we don’t have such a word at all , only forward.
4:56 am
4:57 am
4:58 am
4:59 am
5:00 am
lately they've started doing this tricky thing. maybe i'm just an observation. offensive as usual, artillery there must be preparation, on the contrary, first they beat, beat, beat, they don’t go on their own. as soon as you were defending, you were upset , you were relaxed, and immediately the offensive began. battalion defense on the outskirts

9 Views

info Stream Only

Uploaded by TV Archive on