and the supply of tanks, howitzers, small arms , infantry fighting vehicles, air defense elements, as well as ammunition produced by companies in the czech defense industry. this is a big information evening. that's what we'll talk about. the updated lancets can be a nightmare for everyone in the deep rear, not six scares, kiev with long-range russian drones. and ford has already made disappointing conclusions. ukraine again refused to accept leopard-1 tanks from germany, allegedly due to defects. are bandera’s supporters really so overwhelmed with nato equipment that they can now choose? what to burn in resigned

and grossberg could not remain silent and declared that the prospects for the apu to reach the sea of ​​azov are zero. why suddenly such revelations of deception in the arsenal of the apu? in response to the growing production of russian shells and equipment , ukraine began to produce mock-ups of guns and air defense systems in order to somehow divert attacks on real weapons. will it help when the kei regime distorts history , russian guys come to the rescue in video chats in ukrainian , brainwashed and tell the truth, what are they talking about? so today the defense officially confirmed the fact after the successful russian strike on

the dolgintsevo airfield, it is located in the dnepropetrovsk region of ukraine far from the front line, but nevertheless turned out to be very vulnerable to our high-precision weapons. exactly. there the mig-29 of the kiev regime was struck. actually. here are resonant video frames taken by means of objective control. the fighter is standing on the airfield, and a kamikaze drone is slowly approaching it, which is obviously building the optimal trajectory. then plaka would sharply pick up speed and dive as expected down and hits the target clearly and for reliability. well, we’ll tell you about this a little later, but for now the live broadcast from the gold of the ruins and the results of the colossal tragedy of the second world war became its basis. the charter, it is a key source of modern international law, largely thanks to the un , managed to prevent a new world war fraught with nuclear disaster. unfortunately, after the end of the cold war, the collective west , led by the united states, arbitrarily assumed the rank of judge of all humanity and,

overwhelmed by a complex of exclusivity, became increasingly ignored. the legacy of the founding fathers. today. the west turns to statutory norms and principles selectively from case to case exclusively in accordance with its selfish geopolitical needs. this inevitably leads to a weakening of globality, exacerbation of existing and incitement of new hotbeds of tension in the global conflict. it is precisely in order to stop them and to direct events in a peaceful direction, russia insisted and insists that all provisions of the charter are respected and applied not selectively, but in all their completeness and interconnections, including the principles of sovereign equality of states, non- interference in internal affairs, respect for territorial integrity and the right of peoples to self-determination.

there is the usa, their allies, they are shining, and the systematic imbalance of demands fixed by their tails since the collapse of the ussr, the formation in its place of an independent state in the usa, their allies rudely and openly interfered in the internal affairs of ukraine as public, even proudly recognized at one time by the deputy secretary of state. victoria nuland at the end of 2013 , washington spent five billion dollars on nurturing politicians obedient to the west in kiev. all the facts of the engineering of the ukrainian crisis have long been known. however, they are trying in every possible way to hush them up, to cancel the entire history until 2014, so the topic of today’s meeting , proposed by the albanian chairmanship, is, by the way, possible, and allows us to restore the chronological chain of events, and precisely in the context of the attitude of the main characters to implementation of the principles and goals of the un charter in 2004-2005. west with

with the goal of bringing a pro-american candidate to power, sanctioned the first coup d'etat in kiev, forced the constitutional court of ukraine to make an illegal decision to hold a third round of elections, not provided for by the country's constitution, even more unceremoniously , the confusion of internal affairs manifested itself during the second maidan in 1314, then a whole series of western arms directly interference in internal affairs directly encouraged participants in anti-government demonstrations to engage in violent acts. the same nulant discussed with the us ambassador in kiev as part of the future government, which will form a clean path and at the same time indicated the european union, but its real place in world politics from the point of view of washington, we all remember it with a two-word phrase. it is significant that the european union

swallowed it. in february 2014 , characters selected by the americans became key participants in the bloody seizure of power organized by let me remind you a day after the agreement was reached under the guarantee of germany, poland and france between the legally elected president of ukraine and opposition leaders the principle of not interfering in internal affairs was multiplied immediately after the coup, but they purely stated that their absolute priority was to curtail the rights of russian-speaking citizens of ukraine. and the residents of crimea and the southeast of the country who refused to come to terms with the results of the anti-commission seizure of power were declared terrorists. having launched a punitive operation against them in response to this, crimea donbass held referendums in full accordance with the principle of equality and the very definition of peoples. look, paragraph two of article one of the un charter western diplomats and

politicians in relation to ukraine turn a blind eye to this most important norm of international law in an attempt to reduce the entire background and essence of what is happening to the inadmissibility of violating territorial integrity. in this regard, i would like to remind you that the unanimously adopted declaration of 1970, and the principles of international law concerning friendly relations and cooperation between states in accordance with the un, stipulate that the principle of respect for territorial integrity is applicable, i quote , to a state that complies with its actions principles, equality and the very definition of peoples and, as a result, having a government representing all the people living in a given territory. the end of the quote is that the ukrainian neo-nazis who seized power in kiev did not represent the population of crimea and donbass does not require

proof. and unconditional support by western capitals for the actions of the criminal kiev regime. nothing more than a violation of the principle of self-determination following gross interference in internal affairs that followed the coup in the years the reign of poroshenko and then zelensky, the adoption of russian laws banning all russian education and cultural media , the destruction of books and monuments, the ban on the ukrainian orthodox church and the seizure of its property became a violation of paragraph three of article one of the charter, it is about respect for human rights and fundamental freedoms for all without differences race gender language and religion. not to mention the fact that these actions directly contradicted the constitution of ukraine itself, which establishes the state’s obligation to respect the rights of russians and other national minorities.

when we hear calls to implement the peace formula and return ukraine to the 1991 borders, the question arises. those who call for this are familiar with the statements of the ukrainian leadership about what they are going to do with the residents of the relevant territories, so here you are, their address is publicly heard at the official level many times threats of extermination, legal or physical. by the way, in a similar way, the yes west member not only does not restrain his protégés in kiev, but also enthusiastically encourages their russian policy. by the way, in a similar way, members of the european union and nato have been encouraging for decades the actions of latvia and estonia to defeat the rights of hundreds of thousands of russian-speaking residents who have been called non -citizens. now they are seriously discussing the introduction of criminal liability for the use of their native language,

high officials are officially declaring that the spread of the average opportunity for local students to undergo russian distance school programs should be considered something of no threat to national security and require attention rights of protective bodies, returning to ukraine, the conclusion of the minsk agreements in february 2015 was approved by a special resolution of the security council in full accordance with article 36 of the charter, supporting, i quote, any procedure for resolving the dispute that was adopted by the parties in this case, kiev, donetsk and lugansk. however, in last year, everyone signed the minsk agreements, except for vladimir putin, meaning merkel, aland and poroshenko publicly and even with some pleasure admitted that they were signing this document. they did not intend to carry it out, but only sought to gain time to strengthen

ukraine’s military potential and pump it up with weapons against russia. all these years , they directly supported the sabotage of the minsk agreements, pushing the kiev regime to a forceful solution to the donbass problem, and that was done. this is in violation of article 25 of the charter, according to which all un members are obliged to obey the decisions of the security council and implement them. let me remind you that in the package with the minsk agreements, the leaders of russia germany france ukraine signed a declaration, in to which berlin paris pledged to do a lot of things, including helping to restore the banking system in donbass, but they didn’t lift a finger, they just watched as despite all these obligations, poroshenko declared a trade and economic transport blockade of donbass in the same declaration of berlin, paris was obliged to help strengthen trilateral cooperation in the format of the european union with russia and ukraine for the practical solution

of issues that concern russia in the field of trade, as well as about again i quote the creation of a common humanitarian and economic space from the atlantic to the pacific ocean. this declaration was also approved by the security council and was also subject to implementation in accordance with article 25, but this obligation of the leaders of germany and france turned out to be a dummy, another violation of the statutory principles. the legendary minister of foreign affairs of the soviet union , gromyko, more than once rightly noted that 10 years of negotiations were better than one day of war, following this covenant. we have been negotiating for many, many years, seeking to conclude agreements in in the sphere of european security, we approved the main, establishing the russian nato act, adopted at the highest level the declaration of all of them on the divisibility of security and in 1999 in 2010, and starting from 2015, we insisted on

the unconditional implementation of the minsk agreements that were the result of negotiations, and all in full compliance with the joints, which require, quote , to ensure conditions for fairness and respect for obligations arising from treaties and other sources of international law. end quote western colleagues they also corrected this principle, when they signed all these documents they knew in advance. they will not comply with them in negotiations. now we do not refuse them about this many times, including very recently, president putin spoke and would like to remind the distinguished secretary of state. that president zelensky signed a decree prohibiting negotiations with putin’s government if the united states is so interested in them. well, i think it won’t be difficult to give the command that this zelensky decree be canceled today in the rhetoric of our opponents. we only hear

slogans invasion aggression, annexation not a word about the deep causes of the problems about how for many years they nurtured an openly nazi regime, open, rewriting the results of the second world war and the history of its own people , the west avoids a substantive conversation based on facts, respect for all demands, the charter. apparently, for an honest dialogue of arguments, he does not create a strong impression that western? you see, they are afraid of professional discussions exposing their demagoguery , casting spells of territorial integrity of ukraine, the former colonial metropolises, and they are silent about the un decision on the need for paris to return the so-called french mayuta to the union of comoros for london to leave the chados archipelago and begin negotiations with buenos aires to the pomolin islands, these champions of the territorial integrity of ukraine are now pretending that don’t remember don’t remember the meaning of the minsk agreements, which were concluded

, let me remind you of the reunification of donbass with ukraine with guarantees of respect for fundamental human rights, first of all, the right to one’s native language that disrupted the implementation of these agreements the west bears direct responsibility for the collapse of ukraine and the incitement of a civil war there from other principles, charters, respect for which could prevent a security crisis in europe and help coordinate confidence-building measures based on a balance of interests, i note article two of chapter eight. it is fixed in it. the need to develop the practice of peaceful resolution of disputes with the help of regional organizations in accordance with this principle, russia and, together with its allies, have consistently advocated establishing contacts between the organization of the collective security treaty against road accidents and nato to facilitate the practical implementation of the above-mentioned decisions of the osce summits on the indivisibility of security, stipulating in

particular that no state group quotes. a kingdom or organization cannot be given primary responsibility for maintaining peace and stability in the osce region or over any part of the region. as a sphere of influence. all. it is known that this is exactly what nato was engaged in trying to create its full advantage in europe, now also in the asian technology and ocean region, but numerous appeals from the highest bodies of the csto to nato were ignored, the reason for this position, and the arrogant position of the united states of its allies, as everyone can be convinced today of the reluctance to conduct any or an equal dialogue with anyone, if nato had not rejected the proposal for cooperation, then perhaps this would have allowed us to avoid many of the negative processes that led to the current european prominence due to the fact that russia

for decades they refused to listen or lied. today, when, at the suggestion of the chairmanship, we are discussing effective multilateralism, we should not forget about the numerous facts of genetic rejection by the west of any forms of equal cooperation. what is a pearl barrel worth, that europe is a blooming garden surrounded by jungle - this is a purely non-evasive syndrome that despises the sovereign equality of states and the task of strengthening principles , charter, through the effective multilateralism of which it is brought to our discussion today, trying not to allow democratization of state relations. allies, outspoken unceremoniously privatize the secretaries of international organizations, bypassing established procedures, pushing through decisions on the creation of mechanisms subordinate to them with non-consensual mandates, but with a claim to the right to blame those who, for some reason, do not please washington in this regard.

i would like to remind you of the need for strict. excitement about the charter, it is not only the member states, but also the secretary there of our organization in accordance with article 100, the secretary must act without partiality and must not receive instructions from any government. we have already talked about article two and i want to draw attention to its key point: the organization is based on the principle of sovereign equality of the state and develops this principle of the general assembly in the 1970 declaration i mentioned. confirmed, i quote, the inalienable rights of each state to choose its own political, economic, social and cultural system without interference from anyone, of course, so in this communications raises serious questions for us regarding the statements that our respected secretary general made on march 29 that, quote, autocratic rule does not guarantee

stability, it is a catalyst for chaos and conflict. but a strong democratic society is capable of self-correction and self-improvement. they can stimulate even radical changes without bloodshed, bloodshed and violence, and end of quote one involuntarily recalls the changes brought about by the aggressive adventures of strong democracies in yugoslavia afghanistan iraq libya syria many other countries further, dear antonio buterra. they said, i quote , democracy is at the center of broad cooperation, rooted in the principles of equality of participation and solidarity. end quote it is noteworthy that all these things were said at the so-called summit for democracy, which president biden realized outside the un framework, the participants of which were selected by the american administration on the principle of loyalty, and loyalty not so much to washington, but to the ruling democratic party in the united states? attempts to use

such forums among themselves to discuss issues of a global nature directly contradict paragraph four of article 11 of the un, which states the need to, quote, ensure the role of the organization as a center for coordinating actions in achieving common goals, but to this principle many years ago, france and germany proclaimed an alliance of multilateralists, in which only those who listened were invited, which in itself again confirms the inescapability of the colonial mentality and the relations of the initiators. posted on our today's agenda is the principle of effective multilateralism. at the same time , a narrative was implanted, and the european union as the ideal of that same multivatorialism. now there are calls from brussels to expand the membership as soon as possible, including in particular the balkan countries. but the main pathos is not about serbia, not about turkey, which

has been holding hopeless accession negotiations for decades, and about ukraine, claiming to be the ideologist of european integration, barrel recently did not hesitate to speak out in the sense that the kiev regime must be accepted into the eu as soon as possible they say, if it weren’t for the war, this would have taken years, but it is possible and necessary without any criteria for serbia, turkey and others will wait, but accepting the nazis into the ranks of the european union out of turn, by the way, at the same summit for democracy, the general steel proclaimed , quote, democracy stems because of the un charter, the first words are the charter. we as a people reflect a fundamental source of legitimacy. the consent of those who are governed end of quote is useful to relate. this is the thesis of the track record of the kiev regime, which launched a war against a huge part of its own people against those millions of people who did not consent to be ruled by a nazi.

fob illegally seized power and buried the minsk agreements approved by the security council, thereby undermining the territorial integrity of ukraine. those who , contrary to the charter, divide humanity into democracies and autocracies, would do well to answer the question of what category they classify the ukrainian regime. answer they are waiting to talk about the principles of the hall, and the question arises about the relationship of the security council with the general assembly western collective from the collective the aggressive one has long been promoting the topic of abuse of rights and achieved this through not entirely correct pressure on other members. there is the decision that after each application of this right, which is increasingly deliberately provoked to be considered, the relevant topics at the general assembly do not pose any problem for us, because russia’s approaches to all issues on the agenda are open from the bed, we have nothing to do and it is not difficult to state this position once again. in addition

, the use of summer is absolutely legitimate an instrument provided for in the charter with the aim of preventing the adoption of decisions that would be fraught with a split in the organization, but since the discussion procedure at the general assembly, cases in which the veto is used are approved. why not think about those security council resolutions? which were not approved, were adopted, including many, many years ago, but are never implemented, despite the provisions of article 25 of the charters. why does n't the general assembly consider the reasons for this state of affairs, for example, with regard to the security council resolution on palestine the entire range of problems of the middle east and north africa under a joint comprehensive plan of action. and, of course, according to resolution 22:02, having approved the minsk agreements on ukraine, the problems associated with the sanctions regimes require attention. it has already become the norm that the security council, after lengthy

negotiations in strict accordance with the joint , approves sanctions against a specific country, and then the us allies impose them against it the same state additional so -called unilateral restrictions, which did not receive approval in the security council and not included in its resolutions as part of the agreed package. in the same series, another glaring example has just been taken by berlin, paris and london, through their national legislative norms , to extend the restrictions on iran, which expire in october, which are subject to legal termination in accordance with resolution 22:31. that is, the european countries of britain declare that the validity of the decision on this security has expired. and we don’t care about this. no, we have our own rules, this is all a matter, it’s all the more urgent to consider the issue of after the adoption of any sanction resolution by the council none of the members. he would not have

the right to devalue it by introducing his own illegitimate restrictions. against the same country. it is also important that all sanctions regimes related to this security are limited in time. since their open-ended nature deprives the council of flexibility in terms of influencing the policies of sanctioned governments , the topic of the so-called requires attention. humanitarian limits of sanctions would be correct, so that in future we can ensure our safety and any sanctions projects, was accompanied by the provision of assessments of their consequences for citizens through humanitarian agencies. at the un , they are demographically admonishing olya’s western colleagues that the common people will not suffer. dear colleagues, the facts speak about the deepest crisis in international relations . about the lack of will in the west to overcome your desires, but i hope that a way out of the current situation still exists and will be found first. everyone needs to realize the responsibility for, especially for

our organization, the fate of the world in historical context, and not from the point of view of opportunistic electoral and minute alignments for the next national elections of a particular member state. remind us again almost 80 years ago, when they signed the charter, they were world leaders. we agreed to respect the sovereign equality of all states , large and small, rich and poor, monarchies and republics , in other words, even then humanity recognized the need for an equal, gender-centric world order, as a guarantee of the sustainability and security of its development, therefore today this is not about submitting to some rules-based world order. excitement about all the obligations assumed when signing and ratifying the charter in all their completeness and interconnection. thank you for your attention. sergei lavrov at the un security council well, now

let’s return to the announced topic: russian kaze drones hit a ukrainian mig-29 fighter at an airfield in the dnepropetrovsk region deep in the rear of the kiev regime. let ’s figure out what this means for the balance of power in the zone with the help of anton podkovenko anton hello well this seems to be the case. eh, that newest long-range lancet. greetings, yes, apparently. it is he who is now discussing this blow with a lancet very vividly in nato countries . let’s figure it out. why what is the updated russian lancet capable of now that both the british and americans are wondering? well, most of all, of course, at the general staff, our drone hit the airfield behind enemy lines. and they thought that near krivoy rog we could reach with a lancet. we can’t yet, as we can, the blow to dollittsev in the dnepropetrovsk region began, apparently a bright combat debut of our product, 53. this was the first drone that hit a ukrainian

fighter directly at its base due to this. uh, now the ukrainian military will have to relocate their aircraft further 30, and maybe 50 kilometers deeper, which allows us to detect the takeoff of aircraft much earlier and, uh, intercept them. upgraded attack uavs operate with surgical precision, and new generation lancets can be combined into a single attack swarm that is not knocked off course by means electronic warfare, lancet, even the current modification of the ukrainians is invulnerable to air defense. almost impossible to detect. the drone flies very low, very fast, and its updated version is also far away. this could really change the balance of power at the front. the kiev air defense simply won't have a chance. what in my opinion, roughly speaking, we can now take out their uh anti-aircraft missile systems from afar

and leave their uh strongholds on the front line alone with our aviation. british intelligence mi6 sent to the office of the ukrainian president, intelligence about a new generation of russian lancets with a flight range of up to 70 km. so they write, and the increased warhead , great britain, makes a sensation out of all this. well, in general, we did not hide what the new drones had done. what are their tactical and technical characteristics? let the western intelligence services make assumptions. let them guess about the strike on the airfield near krivoy rog. american forbes speaks for itself and tries to calculate. how many miles were there from the front line to the airfield, from 70 to 90 km, this is approximately obtained if in in our units of measurement they write that the kremlin is developing longer-range lancets and is not ashamed of this, such a beautiful blow to the mig. and what is there to actually be shy about, the american publication, however, makes some

curtsy towards the whole, saying that they will try to solve this problem, but this curtsy is rather mocking, because that, firstly, how everything will be used to eliminate the threat is completely unclear, and secondly, about the used european f-16s, which the square is waiting for, this is basically the point of the new lancet, and we won’t take off they will give it. our drones, even in previous modifications , shot down both ukrainian and nato equipment, so the videos spread literally all over the world and stationary air defense systems knocked out both howitzers and the vaunted leopards. they are burning and there is also ammunition. even in addition , the ukrainian general staff believes that the lancets are detonating. perhaps the most formidable weapon of the russian army , according to their data. our drones this year have already destroyed or damaged three times more equipment than during the entire last year. this means there are more lancets. under sanctions