[000:00:43;00] vladimir putin today visited the innovative scientific and technological center of veliky novgorod, where an exhibition dedicated to the development of the secondary vocational education system is being held, the president also went on a direct video link with kaluga and opened a federal technopark of vocational

education there for training teachers. putin also met with the winners of the high-tech championship , he walked on foot, they say, well, that’s what they say, but he didn’t take the subway , he didn’t fly on an airplane, he didn’t fly on foot, and to knowledge doesn’t mean that everything should have to live in sheds in this regard, lomonosov recalled. this is understandable, but gradually we will do it. they set my record for housing construction, not in soviet times, not in russian times , they never built so much, they never uh, apparently. this year there will be records. it will be a very good show next year. by the way, you don’t know on foot, but well, actually, it’s not really on foot. he moved in himself. yes, he walks next to the cart. yes, this is

generally not enough, like the origin of lomonosov. well , there is a lot of fog around this figure, but not well, a nickel, it has nothing to do with it at all. you see, you started it. centuries have passed in our avrit , you are driving up, you continue these incomprehensible stuff about peter the amazing delta. that is, somehow even i am somehow surprised. well, although on the other hand, the university named after everything, everything that is connected with lomonosov’s origin is sacred there, everything is normal and lomonosov’s son comes from workers and peasants. well, naturally, well, at that time. well , what does it matter about the white sea, that there was not enough prosperity there? somehow he accidentally in german universities it turned out, yes, later it’s good, daddy was a wealthy peasant woman,

he walked on foot in only bast shoes, which means he went straight to the german university, and immediately through moscow, as a rule, men. and they are comics at the general assembly, sergei tych lavrov, of course, he just destroyed the armored personnel carrier, that is, well, just like that, there’s no way to decide. and i want to draw attention to its key point: one organization is based on the principle of sovereign equality of the state , and develops this principle of the general assembly in the 1970 declaration i mentioned. confirmed, i quote, the inalienable rights of each state to choose its political, economic, social and

cultural system without interference from anyone, the end of this arises in this regard. we have serious questions about the statements that our distinguished secretary general made on march 29 that, quote , autocratic rule does not guarantee stability, it is a catalyst for chaos and conflict, but strong democratic societies are capable. management and improvement itself can drive change even radical ones without bloodshed, bloodshed and violence, and finally, quotes involuntarily recall the changes brought by the aggressive adventures of the strong democracies of yugoslavia afghanistan iraq libya syria many other countries further, dear antonio buterras. said, i quote, they are democracies centers of broad cooperation, based on the principles of equality of participation and solidarity. end quote it is noteworthy that

all these things were said at the so -called summit for democracy of participants, which president biden realized outside the un framework, which admiral the american administration is based on the principle of loyalty, and loyalty not so much to washington. how many attempts by the ruling democratic party in the united states to use such forms among themselves to discuss issues of global significance directly contradicts. paragraph four of article 11 of the un, which states the need, i quote, to ensure the role of the organization as a center for coordinating actions in achieving common goals, but in addition to this principle, many years ago france and germany proclaimed an alliance of multilateralists, in which also invited only those who listened, which in itself again confirms the inescapability of the colonial mentality and the relations of the initiators of the principle of effective multilateralism on our agenda today.

at the same time, a narrative was implanted, and the european union as the ideal of that same multivatorialism. by the way, at the same summit for democracy, the general steel proclaimed , quotes, democracy stems from the un charter, the first words of the charter. we as a people reflect a fundamental source of legitimacy. the consent of those who are governed is the end. it's useful to relate this. this is the thesis of the track record of kiev jim, who unleashed a war against a huge part of his own people against those millions of people who did not agree to be ruled by a nazi and russophobe illegally, who seized power and buried the minsk agreements approved by the security council, thereby undermining the territorial integrity of ukraine to those who, contrary the charter divides humanity into democracies and autocracies, it would not hurt to answer the question of which category they belong to ukrainian regime. and, by the way,

i can’t help but note, after all, blinks, well, he’s really a man, apparently, he needs to come to russia so that they understand, we live in pain in the world. russia is in a world of pain as a result of the actions taken by vladimir putin militarily, economically and diplomatically . she is in a much worse position than before she entered into this horrific war against ukraine and when the country he is dealing with limits him to vladimir putin. now here in new york, he was not at the g27 recently, according to in fact, in many parts of the world he is a new city. and so the only thing they can do is turn to a regime similar to that of north korea in iran to try to get what they need. yes

, yes, that’s okay, and you asked about this, he has nothing to say, and he is talking complete nonsense and understands that he is talking nonsense. we are even too lazy to open reference books to look at what is happening with the economy. he doesn’t know the mood inside the country at all. he doesn’t understand where putin goes, how this putin communicates with whom he will generally be a person who works for us, since not a single secretary of state has worked, and not a single secretary of state has worked for him, do you hear, not a single us secretary of state has done , or something, so much to bring russia closer to china , damn it, he doesn’t have to find the peoples of the order, sutulova, the first degree, given comrade, please. yes, well, i feel that they are ready here. internationalists, i also have a few words, but i’m actually talking about what was told to me in such detail. so, when i heard, well, not all, naturally, the speech was excerpts

from them, which i understand that after all our television, our media , took some of the most delicious pieces, but even from a piece of pie you can understand all its taste, especially since we have been trying these pies for a long time. and that’s what i thought, after all, the amazing profession of politics, if in everyday life ordinary people or workers in their places lied, like politicians lie, then this profession, in which it allows, would have collapsed long ago. and they are also journalists. some of them also scold when i listened, it seems that nothing can surprise us

anymore, but still lavrov of three examiners yes at least you can’t leave anatolyevich’s studio, he’s too severe, so i just don’t see them passing an exam in geography or history in the next focus. here's an exam for about the second year in some department of international politics. they received it too. at best, they would get threes at best. it’s surprising that we still need this phenomenon, uh, a politician in an official position. this needs to be studied separately. i hope to do this at my leisure, when i retire completely now about

more serious. well, as for politics , just a few words about armenia in the situation. i knew i could say something else about this. unfortunately, the armenians, especially officially , were worried about the retreat when what just happened. they were attracted to the friends of armenia here in russia in moscow. if you continue to act like this. some even got angry, in this case. here's what i want to point out : speaking of international politics. we talked so much, i in particular insisted on this, because it is obvious. on my the story didn't stop for everyone. and history is a change in boundaries. now we have seen the disappearance of, well, the really existing republic of nagorno-karabakh

or our fathers? and this is not the first and this is not the last. this directly concerns our real understanding of politics, and not this ideal or from textbooks. by the way, sergei evgenievich is still a hairpin. i mean, they want ours for him as practically as lunomonosova. maybe even better here. uh, he said the image was planted here where it was union as a model of europe be culturalism finished with terrorists. fine. this, too, was not only planted there in moscow and enjoyed in the studios corresponding to the establishment there. yes, this experience was waiting for us here, including russian diplomacy - this was propagated by textbooks. i think that in many textbooks it remains. they haven’t been rewritten there yet. well, with

it the problem of western dniester disappeared. and excuse me, there is such a territory that is included in the composition of moldova, we admit it all, but the problem does not disappear from this from the fact that i hope that a-a is much more serious. uh, our foreign policy will now be much more sober and open about all these problems, and analyze and not say everything, carry out the appropriate policy, because a lot has been done before. eh, he really wants it very wrong. in particular. here i focus on, uh, what was commonly said in the world. here again , now sergei again, he just said that this is sovereignty. the organization of exchange nations was thus created, truly a process

sovereignty of different territories. but, especially when the colony was expanded, well, in the sense of turning the empire into western russia, it came, but now if you evaluate it at the end. we have once again entered what many, not just me, call the new middle ages, and the system of solitude in the international arena is being restored. no, no two hundred independent states. and there were, well, they were there for this short period, short from the beginning. uh, the destruction of the colonial system and until the year ninety-one, let’s say, there were clintols sticking out, either there or here and a dozen countries did not connect with the minister of foreign affairs of the russian federation, so it is powerful to argue calmly. you said that for you, lomonosov

is worth more than lomonosov, i argue more than the union. this one is not far behind. but as they say now, it’s not catching up, it’s not catching up, ours. uh, foreign policy hasn’t caught up, uh, and propaganda and much more that uh in recent years, i’ll give a small, small example, a very indicative example from my own experience 10 years ago. i flew away. e to kaliningrad by plane and when entering the ship's commander has already landed. that’s how it’s supposed to be announced in russian and english,

dear ones. passengers. we are preparing to land in the city of kedigsberg. i noted this. having flown there, the state airline russian russian wrote in its blogs and such announcements that we attacked me. well , first of all, they blamed it all on the flight attendant, supposedly it was a flight attendant or stuart , no stuart, and not everyone who flies makes such announcements. eh, they know this, but there was outrage. and what he can’t do is not understand such small things, and so gradually memorable in history. this is an evil memory, sometimes it’s more necessary to remember something. it’s definitely necessary. well, judging by pashinyan, no. well, i repeat, i won’t talk

too much about this about armenia. i could have said more about this: e now they also warned the saps a few words about zelensky. uh, many of you appreciate the situation. now this person is physically trapped by him. you need to survive physically. they need to squeeze him out only if the war continues and they will continue to rely on him, so i understand that these are all tricks. of course i can't and repeat, but i don’t know how to lie like that. this and so on. well, okay. if either death, but something will happen. you will do all this. eh, but he remains this actor according to this very policy. yes, the americans said, like a fontanel hmm, keep your face down. you steal a lot. well, where are these

very successes that you promised? so they allowed you a dacha. but here we need a sober analysis of the further situation. sober, absolutely sober, not coming from some kind of ideal rights that supposedly have been present for years, that’s not a joint. sorry organization united nations, where a wonderful thing that is written is just not being fulfilled, but from a real analysis of what will happen in the near future, in these same international arena. and the last thing i want to say, and again concerns our american studies to this day since then, resisting one famous academician who explained to the journalists. what will america now ask russia for human rights, since

we have signed up for human rights and democracy, but we will have nothing to answer with, convincingly and i was struck, this is not what i asked that the person was absolutely sure that, firstly, america has the right to ask of us. and we must convince them to answer. now, i just don't understand. a horse in a coat , legends of people in a leather coat, well, in the right class, this still remains

in science. when is there a danger that they will simply hang him? uh, pugachev, he says, spit petrusha and kiss the villain’s hand, you won’t get away with it, grinev refused, but otherwise there wouldn’t be a story. she is still being persuaded to spit and kiss her hand. zlate, they are already calling the west the villain and he still says, kiss parsley, that this piece of shit will say something somewhere, he’s no one to me. maybe, what can i say, well, you often see here, we change evil. you know

russia is defined in relation to property. i don't know your definition of class society. it is difficult for me to understand who you call the ruling class of the political summer. name the correct one. the ruling elite. you don’t like the word elite, because it also needs to be said that you all use french terminology, too, i should fly. okay, then i'll explain briefly. now you can guess the names, and that’s it. now let's go arrest him. let's go in our country, i heard in russia, according to the constitution, this is not very clear, but in reality there are two governments. operational economic it is headed by your friend or good acquaintance mishustin and is a political government. it is called the presidential administration. it is headed by your good friend and acquaintance

anton darvich war. excuse me, where is the president of the russian federation? i’m just here it is very interesting. that is, it is now clear that you and i have completely different ideas about how our country is governed. but mine is correct, and yours is different, judging by the successes, no. yes yes. i gave the soviet man this phrase and it has been repeated over and over again. well, because well, how? well, you said that you had one person, you put on a website and said how the president would have to be like that, then another one was needed and didn’t say right away who was posing. you said stop talking about me being the same started discussing me. you said it wrong. do you have the right to state that i am on time? no? this is a statement of non-discussion and i will explain

why, for example, zhirinovsky also gave the most accurate forecasts, although by your definition. it would seem an absolutely irrational definition, 7 minutes talked about the fact that when a definition is given and forecasts are made for international situations, it is impossible to take its attention. you built serve a subordinate clause is impossible. and that is, it was all about the foreign ministry. you were dissatisfied with all this. i'm everything to you said, and vladimir volfovich zhirinovsky spoke very calmly in my program at least twice and said very correct , rational things. in my program, very troubled zhirinovsky spoke a thousand times and always said painful things; the program comes out every day, but mine came out once a week , right. well, the point is that we are talking about forecasts, actually. does the mead function

make predictions? hmm, a whole whole department exists, mead's function is to make forecasts. well, actually. why is there no function? all people do this, if we are talking about public service, if all thinking people make predictions to work, who will? someone else must implement it, that is, the forecast is not so. it’s simple, especially since you propose to abandon any basis. just now, for example, dmitry spoke very precisely. just persuade me, everything is clear what will happen to armenia , everything that is now happening in the post-soviet space is being described. unfortunately , the historical laws of the collapse of the empire, when it turns out that a number of peoples who have gained independence are not capable. unfortunately, state building. they go through the most difficult consciousness of themselves and a number of them find strength and create a state , a number of them lose certain parts of their sovereignty, when you talk about

the political class, what stinks is what i said about the acceptance of the political class. now it’s so blurred because it has become international, because management now in many countries is not carried out by national ones. if you say elites, but inter and transnational are completely different criteria, therefore. you're talking about that according to the constitution we are prescribed two governments. you will simply confuse the audience. i said that this is clearly stated in the constitution. it is not written down, but in reality, we have two governments, political and economic, because you are transferring the functions of a political government. take them away from the people 's elected president and give them to a body that is not elected by anyone, thereby , by and large, undermining the legitimacy of political power in the country with this statement. it’s simple, well, you have to realize it. we are we analyze what we say, we predict. what kind of reaction did this cause the verdict will be in the end. well, i don’t have such powers,

but i have others. now you hear a speech that is more pleasant for you, for me series very nice. let's dmitry 58, i don't remember the third point. now i need to look at this during the break, i’ll look at the courses. well, of course, it’s still like that, well, in fairness, for the main thing, uh, zhirinovsky’s prophecy has not yet come true. this is when the leaders of the largest states will walk on the moon, but here, i look like this, and hmm i i no longer consider it as fantastic, because, by the way, i wanted to start with two such comments. well, first of all, i categorically object to awarding anthony blinky the order of friendship of the people, because, of course, he made a huge contribution to russian-chinese rapprochement. now he is actively working on the direction, and the russian

indian rapprochement will be dealt with in the indian direction. we need to transfer it, of course, there are some there in saudi arabia. the problem is, of course, everything is very fast will correct, but he does it sadly. well, that 's not possible. well, look at this. here i am, i watched it several times, he always does all these things sadly and in general, of course, there were different secretaries of state. they were not smart, but they were clever and according to cyrus vance. but let’s not say who’s like alexander haig, but there’s no one so sad yet, the second one is probably cancelled, it will be very strange to hear, but i’d like to defend stoltenberg, and once a year , a broken clock shows the correct time

if you turn it over , dial down. yes yes he said a very interesting thing hmm i think he said it, as usual, without thinking. yes, what does he say and did not reflect on it later, but nevertheless, hmm, international advice. here are her speeches with this international relations in the usa, there was one piece. very funny , he said directly that nato will remain regional. that is, nato does not want to go beyond the framework of the alliance intended for the territorial defense of member countries located in europe, but, firstly, let me remind you that according to the charter. change for the rude russian word un a, uh, only allowed organizations that ensure regional security, but the global military alliances are prohibited, as if after

inoculation of this axis of berlin. tokyo yes, but in fact he voiced that as a result of internal contradictions within nato, most likely between the americans and the british. here i am denying any serious political role for germany and france, in my opinion, as if these are two hmm such uh, uh geopolitical giants. they. well, it’s like they’re off the board yet, not you, but that’s it. less project of dragging nato into east asia as the organizational basis for the call was removed from the agenda. and this means that