there are countries that would not be included, for example, poland, yes, it did not want to participate in all aspects, including financial ones. yes, they didn’t keep theirs, they don’t have them, they don’t have euros, these were transferred. they gave up their sovereignty in almost all areas , europe, in turn, gave up its sovereignty to the military area completely, the united states . the fact is that, of course, when nato was organized according to the charter, it was correct. dima said that according to the charter, it is impossible to organize a global union, but it is possible

to organize a regional one. it was a region was created that in history no one knew the north atlantic north atlantic no one, and on the other hand the asia-pacific was created, but there it was impossible to build nato load-bearing structures there. for him there was none, therefore. i had to make these two-way alliances, but i always asked the question. if the united states enters a war with the soviet union not in europe, but let’s say it outgrows. she's fighting nato there in korea. americans usually react to it like this. they were spinning around, because the simple question comes nato was created in the war with the soviet union against the soviet union, now it is against russia , which means they are definitely engaging in behavior. although this is located in a completely different region, therefore this connection through the united states exists and now, as it were, two claws that cover the ocean power. this oceanic power covers

the eurasian continent. well, this is a typical, so to speak, mackindorean construction. we come in from both ends and squeeze, and that’s why what’s happening now. that's what they are do. they, in principle, have created a perimeter, but they need to put pressure. here is one main problem - disruption. this is what we should have collapsed a year ago. that's according to all their calculations. we had to collapse, then that’s it, we preferred the pain, as i said, damn it, suffer. it's dry here. he's prettier. they say about this no no, you know, we had to stay in pain then. i’m right now. it turns out that china is breaking out somewhere, right? and, most likely, they won’t go anywhere, the chinese will storm something. they will simply overlay and then the americans will need to break through the chinese blockade and this is already a war of aggression, because yura is taiwan. yes, this is a direct military conflict.

but, for example, we said that let’s now make sure that ukraine wins, hints that then the ukrainian army will go to war against china only yes, but in due time in due time, far in due time, when in the nineties it goes, when in the nineties years included us, there are all sorts of them. gady is thinking of creating, which, by the way, if only we hadn’t moved away from our concept and didn’t change what it was in the nineties. we give them now they were at war with china, but surus talked about the same thing in the nineties and wrote that this was the idea. yes, this is a weapon. yes, it's included. so they would support everyone with all their might and everything else, but the design bureau was for central asia, which was optimized to contain china, they had several projects there, even an article by washington waterley was published and written by its author, as i remember now with this very vysokson surname chewing gum, that's who was the colonel of the second reconnaissance division the united states in europe that played

needs to create a brick. brigade. in orenburg there was a saratation of command for one year. this means our general has been a nato member for one year, she would have consisted of a couple of russian battalions of three or four nato ones and would have controlled the entire space in the central one. this was an article from 2004 or 2005, that's not true . it was a long time ago. but now we approach it differently. you see, this is what, in my opinion, what i saw now is that we have a diplomatic language. you can blame him. he boring. well, there are some conventions there and you probably won’t be able to move away from these conventions right away, of course, i would really like it to be done in my own way. eh, sergei viktorovich said something, so to speak, outside the microphone. yes, it would be more vivid how she would characterize this this is all that happened there, but nevertheless. this is what uvanovskaya is doing now. this is the centric order. we treat him differently.

over the course of a year, this transformation is absolutely obvious that we are going through. that's almost like we had before, for which we fought. it's clear. why did we fight, we are there in a goncentric order of five powers. we borrow a lot. an important place, that is, this five was created in order to rule the world of four. even these four police officers fell for it all. we are one of the four police officers we managed to retain. this is even though we lost the soviet union . this remains. for us, this is important; this is a womb-centric world, but at the present time. i think it's deteriorating quickly. and now the catalyst for this destruction will be that is happening at the traffic police because, in parallel with this series of haute couture sessions, there is a trial going on there, in which we are accused. well, it’s just that, as it were, in the genocide of the genocide of the ukrainian people, jesus, of course, is that now russia has already presented its point of view, that this is not a separate trial about anything.

it is not justified, because even according to the convention, but the other side showed genocide against the people of donbass, i wonder what decision will be made, because there are countries involved that will act against us, of course, and now participates, but they are not the ones who decide. and who are the judges, but they are the judges too. in general, they are basically westerners in the international court. and who they are appointed there is appointed without the information of one of the parties, the students of the other are interested in the fact is that the fact is that the parties who are brought to court, yes, here in court, they are by the consent of these parties. that's what we're talking about? i say, by agreement of the judge, and judging by the appointment there, in my opinion, the chairman is still american or what? but what’s interesting is that once we agreed in march, probably, right? well, by the way, yes, well, it seems to me that today in the course of the discussion

one or two more definitions of what democracy is were found? what are autocracies? vitalievich said that all politicians lie. here, and with impunity, irresponsibility and so on. here it is, but it seems to me that these are the prerogatives of democracy, where politicians everybody lies, and with real impunity. well, it’s kind of gotten into a rut, they ’re using international rhetoric in the pre-election process and so on in autocracies this is more complicated. well , at least you'll have to answer more difficultly. but dima said, so to speak. everyone knows everything, but they say that only autocrats are essentially autocrats, you understand? here is the american definition: only autocrats speak. so , it seems to me that we found it here. how to say , there were, as it were, at least two new facets in this definition. what is democracy? what is it and who is against it? whom? well, in reality , people who do not tell the truth and, as a rule , lie against those who tell what there actually is, and in this sense, this is a very fundamental confrontation. in this

sense, biden was right that this will define the 21st century. well, those who lie constantly, and those who, as if to preserve power there, give some other preferences for themselves, and so on. and those who yes, even when it’s hard, tell the truth to the whole world there , and to their people and so on, and it seems to me that this is actually a very long struggle, by and large, because there is a habit among those people who they lie and stand huge resources. until now, despite everything. well, as for blinkin himself, listen, well, he was simply born into this democracy, that is, the very one that lies. so this is some kind of clannish senility, i don’t even know what to call liberalism. that's how it seems to me, like the last stage of democracy, because well, everything that is said is essentially damn, but it is even deconstructed, which is now the american press. i think that he is, as it were , one of the candidates for being leaked, but this is the person who was originally. well i started my whole career with this, i lived like this until now, as if i was a demagogue. the only thing that

has happened to us lately is that he began to tell the truth. he spoke so deliciously about the fact that, like russia, the world is more, i suspected that he was, so to speak, a masochist. he really wants to come to us. this is where he somehow said with such a dream in his voice and in his eyes that apparently he wants to come here, so to speak, of course, all the windows. well, now , if you are serious about the un, you really understand that it was a very good speech pronounced by sergeevich lavrov. and i was very pleased that it was never there. substantive inclusive and so on there once was used multilateralism, and then as a quote from another person. that is, as if this whole thing was said very well. in this sense of 1970s anglicism. i hope the past is gone and very well, of course, butchered, so to speak. sergeevich of course , all the arguments of this very masochist blinken. that is, as if the us secretary of state spoke there first and he built five points there. why russia say so he is a violator of all norms, so to speak, and so on. uh, and how it was built

, it was built, and well, two impressions at once, the first impression. still, you understand, if we talk about the need for a new world order , we need a new world order, and we take part in it. it seems to me that there is no need to overestimate the legal side of the matter. but after all, sergei hiv fired a legal argument. she’s good, how she would really do great if she were translated or will be translated there in the language of those powers that are ready to listen to us. i think which will sound very good, but this is still very, very legal language and very legal argumentation. i’ll explain now. what’s the matter here, being within the framework of the conclusion , we offer legal language, and in this sense you understand it, it’s like a game between a lawyer and a prosecutor not even in a real trial. ah, well, rather, let’s say to the markets a series about lawyers. this is a good game of thought, but it does not address truly substantive questions. well, that is, important questions because we i was joking. here, well, really

issues that are essential for us, because we are not conducting a special military operation to counteract the united states of nato and believe that our western partners are doing wrong. not because it corresponds to the letter of the paragraph of such and such part of such and such article. ah, because it's correct. because behind this is the truth and god is here if we gather. yes, yes, where it should be. so i immediately see a lawyer in front of me, a smiling lawyer who wants to reduce everything to those same commas. russian with commas russia, justice and commas are reduced, and god is reduced. write it down, carefully. write everything down, do not interrupt the advertisement, then dmitry will continue. we watch to know everything

about russia, the best historical series in the app or on the website we are currently having a debate and i explain that he died for one simple reason, he has no mechanism for implementing his decisions, he is one of the member countries of this security for the whole world, such a universal one, is finished in defeat, because there cannot be a tower of babel. also, therefore it cannot be no world government, never, we are now moving again to what is real politics, and real politics is based on respecting the interests of countries and regions, an attempt to at least

balance them, when they enter into a system of relations with each other and briefly agree on general rules behavior is not all, but they agree, if necessary, coming from one capital to another they do not need, for this it is not new york, not the united nations organization , not a secretary who collects everything, not a secret. all this is not necessary, an organized structure may not be necessary. well, i don’t need a platform. what kind of platform is the kremlin quite right, enough palace in beijing is right in business, i have, maybe, anywhere they can come and sit and talk and nothing will be needed , you know, as it is now. working, well, it’s like such a thing and they rent it out there. no, they are not all open space which are coworking spaces like that. eh, what is this? where are these places? actually, are you renting an office for a short time or

a workplace? well, basically, besides offices and in addition to all sorts of cells. there are meeting rooms there. i kind of understand that this is the best-selling position. well , build coworking spaces in antarctica. moreover, it, so to speak, does not belong to anyone at all. yes, it may not be built. moreover, it’s like technology. talk to solve everything. listen, yes, to develop public catering in this way, of course, the fate of europe was decided on a napkin and nothing. the cuban missile crisis was decided by eateries. and so to speak, well, yes, too, well , okay, in general, i’m finished, i’ll finish my thought about the fact that of course here. eh, the performance is not blinkin's, of course, not at all. and just outstanding. in my opinion. very bright performance. it just seemed to lavrov that he was the end of any organizations or orc structures. this can still be of no use to committees, the bureaucracy itself can last forever, this is what it really is, but ideologically this is already we, once again, we are chinese comrades, in general, all the intelligible people on earth what we

want is for everything to be fair or sort out the squiggles with the americans? here the clubs deal with the americans is pointless, and if with me he turned in his direction and made a small remark about the fact that there is a tower of babel and everything else, in fact the tower of babel - it was destroyed not because all the people gathered together, but because they thought god knows what , of course, all the people who read soviet science fiction decided about themselves. and by the way, not only the soviet one, there was also what kind of cooperation there was for space exploration, and in some places united humanity, but there is one problem - an attempt to unite humanity under the absolutely anti-human absolutely anti-human ideologies that are now preached by the west, thank god it failed, and therefore they have abandoned inclusivity in the language and all other anglicisms , we must abandon the illusion that something can be built with this west, even with the help of all the auto committees in the world in general bessmystsev, but if scholz speaks in the hall , no one speaks zelensky in the hall. few people

speak out. yes, people are advancing there, representing sides of the continent, but no one is interested. it's getting formal while serving zelensky's room, they arrive, for what? if anything, we should try to convince the americans. well, he just came out there, after which the americans began to talk there, well, they talked all over this pentagon. all. well, let's show it now. sumer, yes , president zelensky croaked something on this topic and said, if you don’t get help, we will lose the war, this is a quote. that is, well, he was going to beg for money at all, he doesn’t really need any, what worries him is that i don’t have any african countries. i'm proud to say i greeted you president zelensky that morning in the capitol from the first bite the current situation with the ukrainian contraception of the american ukraine was not going on. this means that there is no direct interest in them, because the weakening of russia will help keep china, that is, everything for the sake of this. there is no need for a general assembly. he had to

come and ask that he doesn’t care about the opinions of african countries, he doesn’t care at all, he needs to beg for the main figure. that's it, there are no main figures there at all now. but when you perform, well, you could have had a trailer before representative hermann the head of germany to speak. ugh, there’s no one in the room, nothing, it’s all crap. the main thing is just listen to everyone pronounce their monologue. of course there is no discussion. then why is this necessary, as it was always created to let off steam , no one lets off steam, because no one else hears what they said. yes, in general, to release also roosevelt belongs to the great phrase, the main problem of people is that they really trust quotes from the internet. i

will finally believe that peter was when i will show a documentary and an interview with him. yes, about peter the great, that is, therefore , roosevelt could not say, by definition, it ’s simply never now even simpler, what’s the point of spending any money in all this. well , they really say nothing, by the way. regarding money, vladimir vladimirovich has an interesting dialogue with the germans. why did it happen? who defeated the federation? in a year, i would say, if you allocate billions a year, it will be great, i pulled out the german tick directly, and told everything that we are having an educational intensive. it's harsh, i'm ashamed to say that he is asking the federation for a billion so rich, and he was just why is it called huge money in this? no. i

know, but a little extra won't hurt. this is all true. we're doing so well. this dialogue took place during the visit , veliky novgorod, a visit to the workspace and classroom of school 21. by the way, i was in this school in moscow, an absolutely amazing project brought down, it gives the opportunity to get a world -class education in the field of it for free, i listened to 21 at the open in moscow novosibirsk in kazan in surgut really has a brilliant educational the system is built on completely new principles and is great. go to work now. well, let's get back to our affairs, international, i ask the colonos to go to the general assembly. yes, it’s definitely in the winter. if it were still autumn, i’d look at it with fish, we’ll kill it in the studio in the winter. yes, i would look biden in the eyes. i wanted my colleagues to have watched it many times already. these are the eyes of a beaten dog and completely begging, like

zelensky’s dog. i mean, the mercy of his master, i don’t know the shackles or rice with the whip is a good image. especially considering that the program comes out very late and the children are already asleep, but the problem is the establishment. excuse the usa , in view of the driver of the grandsons, how i just feel that children are afraid of drivers, that’s why i mentioned the children. but let’s remember trump once in his time. he came to power in the sixteenth year, like the political elites, they were afraid of poroshenko, the baltics were trembling, he said, it will be about the russian president. he will now say to go out. we all know, then he became such a driver for aunt frau, merkel . why don’t you pay 2% of gdp to the budget at all, therefore, here are the drivers who stand behind the secretaries of state; they really remain in democracy. this kind of decorative change doesn’t happen very often.

and by the way, i want to correct you about the european union . yes, this is indeed a part of sovereignty, but at least formally the new countries are the ten that in the fourth year, including latvia, joined the eu and there are other countries there. there was at least a formal vote, whether you want to give up your sovereignty now, but the nato military forced the single driver into slavery, because there was no referendum in any of the countries that joined, including 10 relatively new countries. well, after us , croatia joined and so on. that is, of course, this is uh, but on the other hand. eh, in general, stoltenberg’s statement that nato will definitely not be transported now. i would rate it as a small victory for russia and the diplomacy of the russian and russian military, because exactly a year ago he was screaming hysterically, and i saw this man personally and the facial expressions behind her . it’s interesting to watch and sad eyes, like glinka’s. exactly a year ago she laid out that we let's do it, so this one is from our pacific wing, naturally. nato member the united

states of america was preparing for the taiwan crisis, thank god the latest chinese warning probably somehow influenced them. but if we now rise a little above the level of jokes, then i would like to say one more thing. this is in these minutes, when we are standing in the studio in these seconds. when russia is truly carrying out a great holy work in ukraine, small and many other tragedies happen, and in particular in these minutes of a second evict at least 3,600 citizens of the russian federation deported, who legally, being citizens of the russian federation, reside on the territory of the republic of latvia; such deportees can be up to 25,000. even those who, as if being very old people, passed the latvian language to the highest category, it is not a fact that 80 people will be allowed to stay. our secret service is the state security service. latvia has canceled the exam certificate, this certificate, which provides grounds for extending the residence permit, and this, it seems to me, is very

serious task. and of course, i would personally be very happy to see the political leadership of russia, the leadership of diplomacy, sergeevich lavrov, along with the wonderful addresses to guttersch. maybe he somehow reacted to this tragedy. because the emirates will not stop there after the expulsion of real citizens of the russian federation - these are your citizens. i am a citizen of latvia, but these are your citizens. they will take on non-citizens of estonia and latvia, of whom there are hundreds of thousands, they will take on this idea, which was verbalized by the former the minister of justice of latvia illustrates citizens of russian ethnic origin. which, by the way, is what our neighbors, the estonians, are already doing. they will be putin's ruslan fry absolutely. but the grandfather was with such a schultz in the sss and at the foundation sula. that is, this is a really, really big problem , of course. i would like some more acute and

effective reaction at the federal level, because now, well, all that is seen from latvia is the local authorities reacting. in particular. pskov region already. what budgets do they have and what powers do they have? for example, governor vedernikov, but buses at the border are on standby. if it is still oil. yes, they are a little bit at a time. in december, it seems like the authorities backed down. according to us, we generally need to develop such a package, refugees, given that we, according to the principle of the far east, do not have a guitar. no, well, i mean, people who find themselves in a difficult situation, that is, so that people know that they are moving. so we give them land. everything is there. if you need a mortgage there so you can build, that is collect these decrepit old men. 70 are those who were actually carried on stretchers to his language exam, including cancer ones, damn it, i don’t understand, but in the sense that the state should develop a program to help them, just as the displaced people there need you, that is , the point is not what to call them the point is

what kind of aid package they are waiting for. and so they should know. they must understand that russian cool would be very good ; russians of all different nationalities and all different religions would be beautiful. that is, all the peoples of russia should know that their homeland is here and they can always come to their homeland and their mother’s homeland, do you understand what else? why are there russians from estonia and russians from latvia in droves, not valya since 1993, there are a lot of them russians. there were more than a million technical ones in latvia alone at the time of the collapse of the ussr, because for many riga is russian, the city too, of course , the city is russian. well, wait a little. well, now we’ll finish in ukraine, then taiwan later, and then we need to help our chinese friends, you know, and then at the same time, i don’t want to scare the balts in any way, but i i am simply deeply convinced that we have entered the age of war. that the age of peace is over? that

is, we have entered an era of wars, but this era, by the way, was started by the baltic states first. yes, that doesn’t matter now. yes, maybe it doesn’t matter. in ukraine yes, ukraine is everything and this may be the last remarque. but this, uh, example of poland is so sharp. yes, i even said, i reacted hysterically. all of us are no longer supplying weapons, and the rest have simply reacted with their feet and actions. e and initially europe did not really want to supply weapons to ukraine in the first months after the start of a special military operation. eh, i remember, for example, the first batch of military supplies. belgium, a month after february 24, 3,000 rifles, that’s all. so, then there were leopards. this is now being forgotten. that is, well, they wrote it off, threw it into scrap, an old weapon that, uh, seems to be quite difficult to recycle, and well, the europeans were allowed to spice it up. this is a good dose of russophobia. well, yes, we help with weapons to cut the hand, they also said, but now europe understands who won the

ukraine indeed. everything is ukraine and it doesn’t matter. the pathologist there says how the deceased died, doesn’t say why this is all really optional, huh? even though you were talking about zhirinovsky’s forecasts soon, i immediately remembered in 1925 vladimir volfovich foresaw the beginning of the processor for creating the ussr in some new form, so let’s wait and see the box. i don't remember. and who said that russian education should lead to ignorance of skills? there were very specific, very specific girls with his last name. i'm fine known. well, you will announce german gref, but you remember the story. why are you embarrassed yourself? and, that is, this is how we go. here he is engaged in education. no, why did he go there? he brought me to the best it school in the world. now she has helped us solve the problem of

personnel shortages. skills and skills are where our people who come to work, they already come with an education. that is, after receiving education. you come to this school. there is something i don't understand about education. this is specifically it-sulfur free almost none, of course. well, there are some there , i didn’t go to such a school. i don’t understand this correctly and the school in our time, unfortunately, there were no such people, in this they talked about a class of such exactly forgiving the other class, that is, the class. i don't mean the president. i don't mean some. according to marxist concepts , it is the stratum that rules in your country. this is not a class. this is what vladimir clearly defined

the solution to, what is it? this past is your plan and there is also lenin’s definition of a half-tocracy. which distorts and sabotages. the instructions and policies are those that your president wants to pursue or not? this is the problem. let's come to the addresses to see how much i want to see. name who to come for now. this is a large part of your state that has already been dumped from us by most of those who were ours one and a half times. after the beginning, she became economists and smoothing out that, after they dumped, more than half remained. no no no he’s for this by name. now let's go explain, uh, here's vitaltovich. and hamina is known. so. give names to the studio. this is in another

organization, the names are called, and they raised the discount rate by another percentage. you can’t pour too much gasoline on inflation. there can be no more brakes on economic development, and listen when they say. to the fact that you owe a year ago to the twenty-second year of all exporters within three days. 70% of the currency was exchanged for rubles, what happened then? the steering wheel has risen to 55 rubles dollars. and when all this was taken away, you have such an exchange rate, that is, it fights inflation. inflating the dollar exchange rate to unprecedented heights absolutely unrealistic according to the russian

economy as defined by your minister.