are you interested? this topic said that karabakh is the area of ​​responsibility of the russian peacekeeping contingent and it was implied about this show conversation during the negotiations that the status of karabakh is postponed and will be considered later, therefore. uh, after the example of armenia signed that karabakh is azerbaijan , blame us for doing this. well, unfortunately, there are a lot of politicians like that out there, roughly, we understand their biography. e. well, we have, uh, strong convictions that the armenian people remember our common history and their history is associated with russia and other friendly countries, especially the strange ones of this region. they are for those who come from overseas. artie internet

's arrival at the general assembly and russia's participation in the work, taking into account the isolation of russia, taking into account your criticism, and he of the world order, and taking into account that russia is violating the central principle. it hasn't gotten any easier because there's a lot to do here. and uh, if you want to describe isolation, but you describe you observe our delegation, observe how we spend our time here, who we meet. e what else are we doing? which? uh, we attend multilateral events. we work with those who respect themselves and who will never

betray their national interests, because they were clicked on by washington. we know how american diplomats around the world travel and are forbidden to meet with our diplomats. and in general with russian representatives. i will say this: the usa is a great power. everyone understands, but for a great power to run around like this and threaten everyone. only then to show your obsession with, uh, dominance, it’s shameful for great powers do things like this, and we work with those things. there are people who are ready to work with us, and i’ll tell you honestly. i wasn't bored. yesterday i started working at 8:00 am, and we finished at 8:00 pm. western

colleagues accuse russia of using food. as a weapon, by not extending the black sea initiative, another question nord stream has passed almost a year after the explosion compared to the black sea initiative. together with the interests of other participants, but if the ukrainian part of the package was carried out

quite effectively and quickly, then in the russian one it was not carried out at all and uh, at the same time, several times while it was still functioning, this ukrainian part of the initiative, and along the very corridors in the black sea that our sailors opened for the safe passage of dry cargo ships with grain and these same corridors were used several times to launch drones , surface drones, to strike russian ships. we warned several times this was not stopped either, but the main reason why we came out of this transactions. she ceased to exist. this is what was promised to us. it all turned out to be a hoax. i respect the efforts of the secretary general. eh,

i respect the effort. uh, rebecca greensport general, they are sincerely trying, uh, but uh, not returning our main agricultural bank to the swift system , they are solving the problems of uh unhindered entry of russian ships into ports, and the mediterranean ones, first of all, but also other european ones, and not solving the problem of insurance, which jumped fourfold. and a whole row other things, by the way, in the ukrainian part itself, in the ukrainian part of the package, which was signed last year. it also contained obligations to restore the supply of ammonia. in the context of the expansion of extra fertilizer you all know that even before uh, we pulled out of this initiative. this ammonia wire has been blown. and this is also the

case with the nord stream. no one remembers this ammonia wire; they are not going to investigate this, but as for nord stream, this is another example. i just can't just to list another example of how the most important facts are swept under the carpet, how they prepare, uh, the very next lie, so that they can then build some of their next geopolitical schemes on this lie. this is on butch salisbury's list. navalny is all there , this is nord stream. well, again, this is also a very serious thing and the fact that hmm, returning to the possibilities of returning to this grain story. and i was a little surprised. we continue to work, as i said from

the general with the guys, but i was a little surprised when the general secretary. in an interview on the eve of the general assembly session, he began to say that he is still seeking the implementation of the memorandum between the un and russia, but he yes, to begin, use this this channel for the export of russian grain fertilizers, but in all his actions he does not does not leave the sanctions regime and does not violate the unilateral sanctions regime, which were illegally imposed on the russian federation by the americans and other western allies. and this is very significant. the answer he understands is that he cannot do anything because for more than a year they made it clear to him that don’t even think about the fact that the sanctions will be softened in order to implement this part of the package.

therefore, he is looking for some artificial ways to circumvent these sanctions, he admits that he works within their framework, hence it is not rosselkhozbank that appears, but some branch in luxembourg appears, which does not even have a license to carry out banking banking operations, hence appears, uh, regarding bank transfers , an attempt on a one-time basis to negotiate with some american banks. that is, that is what they offered us means that tomorrow we will resume the ukrainian part of the deal. and yours is still a couple of months away. we will try to discuss and reach a solution.

questions from two parts about russia's black sea initiative to these proposals and agree to a regime for the black sea, when these four proposals are implemented, you formally agreed to the general to move along this path , one of them is the connection of a subsidiary bank of rosselbank to swift. and as for nagorny , he answered with karabakh himself. characterized your sentences as constructed. not with the goal of getting an exemption from sanctions, but in some way not to violate these sanctions, but at the same time to find some ways to do what you mentioned. here is an example of a branch. eh, what did you

say, rosselkhozbank in luxembourg? this is not the branch he says, so we will agree that all of you will open the ukrainian part of the deal tomorrow, and in two months we will connect this branch to you there, firstly, this branch does not even have a banking license. and secondly, it is already standing idle there ; it is in the process of being closed. in short, this shows how deeply vaughn's experts penetrate into the essence of the issue. as for, uh, karabakh, our peacekeepers there are now helping contacts between uh, karabakh representatives and uh, azerbaijani uh, officials, they met the day before yesterday, they are meeting, in my opinion, today again, and our peacekeepers are present there, based on the fact that their role is important for strengthening trust so that the karabakh people, especially at first,

feel safe. how much will it take? eh time? which what quantity peacekeepers, damn it, are required . this is a question that is being decided on the spot on earth. these questions are correct to say that russia formally rejected the proposal of the secretary general. if you want some nasty stuff, be sure to write and you like the word rezector. it's your choice please. i explained to the secretary general. why can’t his proposal work? we don’t reject them. they are simply not implementable. we are our own truth. write next time. then we are talking about the recent attacks on crimea, where a us plane was scattered, which was found there and

this indicates that the people of the united states may have been directly involved in the presentation of data, in addition to this. we now have a promise from biden to deliver. a-and attacks from long-range missiles , to what extent is the us becoming? at what point does the united states become a participant in the conflict and at what point does the united states become russia's adversary in this conflict legal norms? uh, in accordance with which the country is defined as a direct participant in the hostilities ah, and we don’t talk about them , western countries try in every possible way to avoid and not remember. but the fact is that they are actually fighting against us with the hands and bodies of ukrainians. i think everyone present here who is even the slightest bit interested in, uh, the huge flow of information

that is coming out and the analytical materials that are coming out in connection with the ukrainian situation, well, i’m very sure. yes, i know that the americans, the british and many others are fighting, and they are fighting by, firstly, providing more and more weapons. eh, and today i gave a speech at the assembly and cited numbers. how much is invested now minimum 170 billion dollars invested in ukraine alone in the background? moreover, these statistics are also available to trace the fate of those promises and those volumes and terms , uh, that were given by western countries to africans and uh, other countries that need assistance primarily in terms of development and resolution of issues. uh, related to under uh, climate change. it’s impossible to compare closely and look at how

loans are issued, developing countries in the imf in the world bank and even in the international development association were given loans to ukraine. at almost 700% of it to well, no one has ever done this 700%. now, ukraine’s debt is significant and permission to pay until the year 27 is such a quick uh and uh, preferential decisions are no longer in relation to any. strange, they were never accepted, but uh weapons - this is clearly instructors - this is also clearly trained and uh in poland and in germany in britain i'm not sure that we know the instructor, not that i know that instructors work in large numbers and on the territory of ukraine and there are certainly a lot of mercenaries there, a significant part of which

are career officers. well, just the status of a mercenary, but it allows you to kind of avoid that very intersection, that is, the very legal line, but you read the information from the satellites, and those mean statements about elon’s position with the mask of his company starlink, but these are military satellites that work everywhere on the plane. the scouts are also in the air and just like that. american intelligence officers first of all and british ones, they are watching. they not only help you aim, but also monitor you. where do our anti-aircraft systems come from? defense, to help next time. so well, this is hmm, you can call it whatever you want, but they are at war with us, they are directly at war with us. and we call it a hybrid war, but this does not change the two-part

first part of my question. the united states always says that if the ukrainians stop doing this anyway, ukraine will no longer exist, does russia recognize the sovereignty of ukraine? back in 1991, we recognized the sovereignty of ukraine on the basis of the declaration of independence, which ukraine accepted when leaving the soviet union and

the declaration contains a lot of good things , including the fact that they will respect the rights of national minorities, they will respect the rights of the russian language and other languages. it was directly mentioned there, then all this was included in the constitution of ukraine. but in the declaration of independence it was one of the main things for us. eh, there were moments that ukraine would be a non-aligned country and would not enter into any military alliances. here in that edition, under those conditions, we support the territorial integrity of ukraine when it came there, they had one, mini-coup, back in 2004, the americans dragged there illegally, forcing the ukrainians to hold a third round of elections, which is not provided for by the constitution, they ended up putting their own people in the presidency, even then we

communicated well with her, we worked normally, ah, but when the second year the revolution happened. it happened a day later. i'm like this all the time. i understand that i explained it poorly, all these months , yesterday and wednesday i also explained it poorly, it happened a day after the signing of the settlement agreement in in accordance with which early elections were to take place, the opposition occupied all administrative buildings in the morning. and when we began to call the guarantor of this agreement in the person of france, poland and germany, it was not very clear to us. they said that sometimes democracy takes on such unusual forms. uh, and uh, first of all, these democrats, who killed more than 100 people, carried out a coup first of all. they announced that they would cancel the status

of the russian language in ukraine. they immediately announced a campaign of militants, armed in crimea, to expel and seize the crimean parliament. these people. they simply stood up to defend their homes , their own language, their traditions , and held referendums. and then, well, crimea immediately joined russia and against donbass. as soon as they passed the referendum, kiev abandoned military aviation, tanks bombed, uh, cities and towns, all this disgrace stopped a year later with the signing of the minsk agreements, and last year all those , besides putin, who signed them, merkel alant and poroshenko said, we didn’t intend to do anything fulfill. we needed time to give ukraine weapons against russia and, most importantly, a declaration. and 1900.

the same general secretary tells us very often. no, we must implement the resolution on ukraine because the general assembly adopted it. well, it’s good there if you take this logic and implement it, but for some reason then the resolutions on many other issues are not implemented , including the wild colonization on the island of mayonet on the chi archipelago. why britain is avoiding implementing the general assembly resolution on malvinas islands, but if we take the resolution, these are the resolutions that we know? what methods of pressure were used here, uh, our western colleagues, they all voted and somewhere, well, a good third did not support these resolutions, but here is the resolution that i now want to say. it was an absolutely unanimously adopted declaration on the principles of relations between sovereign states based on the un charter and it

said about sovereignty and territorial integrity. everyone is obliged to respect the sovereignty and territorial integrity of those countries whose governments respect the principle of self-determination of peoples and, by virtue of this, have a government and and, by virtue of this, represent all peoples , we live the entire population living in a given territory. that is, in order to be respected, you must respect your population and the general secretary. he is our dear antonio gutarish. in one of his speeches he said, and the principle that opens the charter is that we are peoples. means democracy means that rulers must have the consent of those they rule. here is the general assembly in its time. said, let us respect the territorially integral verse. who represents the entire population

living on its territory, when they essentially started a war against donbass and crimea . well, how can you say that this government of these puchists represents that people or the people of those territories that already now, last year, held a referendum on joining the russian federation , so we have no problems with the territorial integrity of ukraine, it was destroyed. who carried out and supported the coup, the leaders who declared war against their own people and began to bomb their own people.

thank you, thank you, how will this affect russia’s relations with the dprk and what do you plan to discuss during your visit to north korea next month and there are some other reasons why you did not listen to the speech of president zelensky , both evgeniy actually and and in the security council. thanks to kim jong-un in the russian federation, there were comments for the press by the president of our affairs. he spoke about the areas of cooperation that were discussed and which we agreed to develop and supplement and in accordance with what we agreed on. uh, kim jong is president putin. eh, we will build my negotiations, in general , which really are not the case. eh, they may take place next month. and as for you know, i didn’t even think about the fact that i know what zelensky can tell. by the way, he was not in a good mood, and then he watched something on tv and he was not happy, but i have my own things to do. i mean, we all know what

he'll say. why waste time, and i'm 33 there were scheduled bilateral meetings. and they were, in general, much more useful. thank you maria thank you mr. minister abdel, it seems that i ask the same question every time, but now i have a two-part question a few days ago, which is the maintenance of international

law, repeated that countries support. i would like to address the issue of these double standards and continue this theme every time i ask a question regarding the right of palestinians to defend themselves. just as this applies to other peoples who correspond to the external external dominance of colonism, it comes to the state decision of the secretary general. he spoke about the example of kandy, he said that palestine would find in the footsteps of gandhi, from whom billions were supported. people, unlike the palestinians , who were pushed to the wall, if the palestinian people have the right to resist occupation, resist external domination by israel. thank you very much on the palestinian issue. there are

resolutions and un security councils and we are in favor of all these resolutions and guidelines regarding the first issue. i'll read it out. text, and then you will tell me yes, and donbass is verified potan tu rashtos security security nato there are militias present in ukraine that are supported by nato, the zelensky regime itself . all of them represent a significant security burden for russia and decl bass control in this situation. i think this issue is of great interest to russian security legal issues. it is

something else that happens over time. if the situation there changes the situation in ukraine will change, then it was already possible to look at it there, but we have not come close to this yet. february 8, 22, and you asked him about goals, but he answered, onion livenga, deadcration delegalitis website, legal issues, and with this he began the statistical issues of the dutch heights is very important for the security of israel while iran is in power in syria, while iran there are rebel groups in syria that support the siege. iran all of this poses a significant threat to israel's security and as practical question is the question in this situation. i think it remains important for israel's security, legal issues are nothing less. here's your answer, please. now

eat thank you very much, the largest media outlet in kurdistan. yesterday you met cancer and russian companies operate in iraq in kyrgyzstan, the new government cannot pay, and its debt obligations due to the sanctions of the united states, this issue will be resolved with the arab government while the united states refuses to make withdrawals under the sanctions second question. do you have good relations with kurdistan disputes disagreements, if you have any interactions with both sides in order to overcome disputes overcome differences thank you and and almost kurdistan if

you have any contacts will be removed, and now he told us that if he returns to the white house that he will be able to resolve the ukrainian conflict very quickly. well, you think it’s donald trump or those who will help him do this. we are now we you see, the first question was, what if zelensky cancels, but not us, well, not we are engaged. we don’t come up with such fantasies and come up with some hypothetical situations in which we will have to work. we work in the real situation that has developed. we have a nazi regime in kiev that forbade negotiations with us. by the way, before he banned, negotiations took place in march and april 2022. we have agreed to. and everything was already initialed. and 2 days later

the butch took place because i think someone in london or washington did not want this war to end. read what it is maconal said, uh, not too long ago, senator. uh about the fact that um this is not uh support for ukraine is not charity. this is an investment in the american military-industrial sector. this is an incentive for the entire west to invest money in the production of weapons in the united states. and thereby increasing their influence on europe and preparing for confrontation with china, they openly tell all this, so who can do what? i don’t know, but we emphasized it again. we were ready. we weren't just ready, we agreed to negotiate. we reached agreement on april 20.