my father, after the front, was sent to graduate school to study in moscow; there was one caucasian intake. there were all armenians , azerbaijanis, azerbaijanis, georgians, everyone was friends, everything was purposeful. why was this done? ah, because it was necessary to educate. national elite in general, in the soviet spirit, they did not spare this remedy, so these questions are the last we have any chance of uh, getting out of this. well, there is still. it seems to me that it may be, the main guarantee here is that, in my opinion, the production of americans is in americans. e. in armenia, of course, it is not beneficial for anyone from russia, not iran, and even turks. although they are allies. i think that in this sense

we still have some kind of maneuver, but in principle. uh, and, of course, a lot depends here, as they say, on the position of the armenian society of the armenian people. if they are still preserved, there are some internal needs to preserve armenia, because in my opinion. it will still lead to destruction. well, already that basic armenia, then, then, in principle, as they say. uh, this policy should be stopped by society, but i don't know how much. unfortunately , of course, many people left armenia energetically, frankly speaking, the educated ones that make up the elite. she basically, listen in russia. but i hope that, after all, this common sense will prevail, because it seems to me that this will be a complete disaster, for example,

communication with the studio, the director of the information department of sadness of mitro russia, vladimir stared at zakharova maria vladimirovna immediately from new york and immediately to us. thank you very much. yes, good evening. yes, in moscow in the evening there really are time zones. yes just literally a couple of hours ago flew by and right away you really have a brilliant speech from sergei viktorovich both at the assembly and a stunning press conference, when he took care of all the sisters and put everything in its place. and you completed it very beautifully. i can’t help but note the repetition of what i feel for the boys’ humor. what is the overall result in our delegation on this matter? well, i think that, it seems to me, it would be correct to really start from the end with a press conference, because the quintessence of this western ideological offensive was

the correspondent's question. cnn vestsel, irony, she passed this question absolutely in that strategy in that, and the formulation as they were 3jied, as if isolated. how uh how the phenomenon happened. well, as a matter of fact, we even published yesterday, uh, hmm, a video in response to her corresponding question, in which we focused exclusively on sergei lavrov’s dozens of bilateral meetings on the sidelines of the general assembly and his participation in multilateral formats, and not only those are un formats, but also those regional ones in which russia was a co-founder, which are just like that on the margins, where the assemblies are held. i want to say more that for those who think that this could be some kind of formality, yes, or, on the contrary, some kind of zealousness of the russian

side, which ran around. there, countries happened to have offices and asked to shake hands, because this is exactly how it is presented to the western community, not only the western community, but from the outside it was told how people, so to speak, are drawn into information husk, but because uh, look. these are also all facts. these are documentary facts. after all, all these dozens of meetings. they took place in the russian room in the room in which the russian delegation has the russian coat of arms, where the russian flag stands, where the portrait of the medical president is located, where the head of the delegation, minister of foreign affairs of the russian federation sergeevich lavrov, who is under illegal sanctions, is present. these same uh about western states, well , western nato states, where is ah, the chairman of the international committee. i advise the federation, mr. karasin, to also

be on these same creepy nato lists of insanity, and in this very room these dozens passed through. meet. this is very important to understand, and to distinguish between this presentation of the intrusive, and the american mainstream media, which forms the story about the heroic zelensky and the truth at the same time begins to say so. to shift and marginalize e, so that he is completely 100% manual and at the same time talk about the isolation of russia, everything is exactly the same, on the contrary, a marginal figure and without the efforts of the american media zelensky , who everyone is already really shying away from. he really becomes the hero of some kind of american, but a comedy action movie, in the center of which is the figure of such an under-dictator and the normal factual

systemic work of russia by the russian delegation, and in the office in the room there is a space that comes from representatives of different countries and those that are ours those who represent, uh, other continents are also neighbors and historically connected with us. and those who, in general, are even on the other side of nato, the camps were different. this is reality, but i agree that in our time in our era, reality is relegated to the background. nobody is interested in the facts, nobody is interested in what is really happening. although you and i are eyewitnesses of today's events. why look for endless ones? and the answers to the question. well, why, i understand. but we also see how interesting and attractive it is for everyone to ask

questions from the past and how the ancient egyptian pyramids were built. what happened to flood and yes, it’s interesting and exciting, but i’m here today and you can find answers to today’s questions. if you just take the trouble to read and look at the facts , there are plenty of facts on any issue, but incendiary ones, you know, hollywood and american stream it’s much more motherly, well, actually, that’s what it ’s worth. uh, at the core or lies in the depths. this very temptation. it is always more attractive than what is right, but that doesn’t stop us. we go our own way and work. so the isolation didn't work out. you were watching, they strictly did not allow you to leave the twenty-five-mile zone , the police came up and talked about russian diplomats. this very zone has already been prescribed

historically. and moreover, i remember a number of high-ranking russian delegates who in recent years. eh, they tried to come over there and they were given restrictions not even within a twenty-five mile zone, but literally along the route from the point of resettlement to directly, that there were even such attempts to get to the apartment, and therefore for us , for the people who are the owner diplomatic passports are not something that is the norm from the point of view of our perception, but this is something that the american side has already prepared for us a long time ago. when i worked directly even in a mission. it was also a law in our country that diplomats lower than an adviser could not travel without prior notification, that is, without prior notification to the american side. then the screws were just tightened, but we also gave our answers, but now this affected journalists and representatives of the media, but, probably,

against the background of the fact that a year ago they were not allowed in at all. yes, in this case it’s not such a difficult story. they actually flew to new york, even there were apartments there, they worked, lit and so on, but this element of the fact that it’s as if baba yaga is not sleeping. and where it can be so on there and on gas. so he still remains in the american position and they have already written to all journalists that they cannot leave this zone there, i haven’t even seen an example there plus-mi. understood, uh, and you ask a question. actually, why? if they go to new york to work at their headquarters, strictly speaking, because not everyone can afford to live in manhattan during these very 10 days of political discussion at the general assembly. yes, even if they come for 3-4 days, as the russian delegation did, the prices are catastrophically high. during this period , many live in brooklyn, many live where it is possible and just don’t get there.

these are the territorial or geographical restrictions. well, nothing came out of the situation. it's okay. we're back. everyone is alive and well. all fine. thank you very much maria vladimirovna , well, our diplomacy always wins, comrade general. yes, well, me too, in general. i'll start with the general assembly, but about my favorite pro-nuclear weapons. here, uh, zelensky again. uh, already from the rostrum of the general assembly, he again started a song that ukraine was deprived of its nuclear potential, that the russian federation needed it, or he said this at the interview, it was possible for the russian federation to be decided, and not for ukraine, i’m still waiting for when, uh, when he will start a song that russia disarmed ukraine. i’ll just remind him, a few figures, in general ukraine received uh, twenty uh, two uh, percent.

uh, the combat, in general combat potential of the soviet union three combined arms artillery tank armies four air armies, a separate air defense army a separate army of the strategic missile forces parts of the airborne forces parts of sea schools and academies on the territory of ukraine 800,000 personnel 6.5 thousand tanks, 7 7.000 armored combat vehicles one and a half thousand airplanes. compare with the figures at the beginning of our special military operation. and where did it all go? they sold everything. so to speak, they ate about well, they won’t, so to speak, in other words there is nothing, the same with the military-industrial complex all all enterprises of the military-industrial complex are also about 25% in the fourteenth year there is about no more than no more than 20% left of that was

regarding nuclear weapons. yes, indeed, in ukraine there was a forty-third army of strategic missile forces in vinnitsa, 186 e intercontinental ballistic missiles, 44 aircraft. e, long-range aviation strategic bombers tu-195 and 1995 and tu-160, which had 500 cruise missiles on board nuclear warheads in total, if the warheads are 1,276 nuclear warheads and this is more than china now has, of course, and plus 2,500 units of tactical nuclear weapons. moreover, i’ll tell you this, that the first only practical conditions, when sushkevich called bush from viskuly about recognizing the independence and independence of new

states, but we were talking about belarus, kazakhstan , russia and ukraine, the only thing was that all nuclear weapons should be removed to territory of the russian federation, everyone agreed with this. yes god these are the only conditions all nuclear weapons should be concentrated in one country, but naturally in the russian federation because it is the legal successor. secondly, the entire system for managing nuclear potential, including in ukraine, was located in moscow and was strictly centralized. therefore, i knew about this, by the way, uh, we had no problems with the belarusians. we had no problems with kazakhstan; we had a lot of problems with the ukrainians. by the way, uh, kravchuk knew about this and this is that he has no levers and no means of controlling this nuclear

potential, so he frankly said that if we had nuclear weapons left, we would be like a monkey with a grenade , kuchma knew about this, who also did not raise this issue first. whoever raised this question was a fucking idiot. and so, after yushchenko, it went away that ukraine was deprived of ukraine. ukraine was left, so to speak, without nuclear potential. all this is completely complete, so to speak, not true, and moreover, and when kuchma signed the budapest monarda there in general, uh, it was specially stipulated that all this would be financial, so to say, ukraine is provided with and compensated for nothing. transferred to the russian federation for free for the entire russian federation, paid for the uranium and for the missile because of the aircraft for everything and this, so to speak , was also uh, one of the features of the transfer of nuclear weapons to ukraine

. i generally have to say that recently this is the topic of uh nuclear weapons. it starts to come up more and more in speeches and performances. just recently, uh, the crown prince of saudi arabia said that if iran becomes the owner of nuclear weapons, then so will saudi arabia, so to speak, will become the owner of nuclear weapons. i think that there will be no problems here, because pakistan has obligations to saudi arabia. saudi arabia actually financed the nuclear potential and the acquisition of nuclear status. e pakistanis, so pakistan will share everything. what can there be in the middle east who are willing, if it turns out that saudi arabia is there and the united arab emirates and egypt, by the way, it’s not a request from turkey , which, so to speak, is now creating a

civilian sector of the nuclear industry, but you yourself understand that if the state has enrichment technology, uh, plutonium production reactors. that's it, it's very fast. maybe, uh, so to speak, it will end with the possession of nuclear weapons, not to mention the asian ones. eh, so to speak, the asia-pacific region. just recently, one of the a-and such influential and authoritative organizations that deal exclusively with the nuclear potential of north korea suddenly discharged, uh, a study that quite calmly analyzes the results of uh, kim jong-un’s visit to the russian they start the federation with a diesel-electric nuclear boat there. uh, well, not project 841, they called it 841. i don’t know. they have

20 of these boats, 10. uh, launchers. e pipes. that is, uh, they already calmly believe that, but this is the way to re-equip these boats. uh under uh, carriers, nuclear weapons, very quickly. uh, will create, uh, a nuclear component , a naval nuclear component, uh, a component of a hypothetical north korean triad for some reason nearby, because kim jong-un put it there. the task following the visit is, firstly, to create our own nuclear power plant the americans are tense about the submarine, because the only country that can, so to speak, help north korea create an e reactor for a nuclear submarine is the russian federation. kim jong-un has set the task of creating, uh, a whole chain of surface combat

ships, they have problems with uh, gas turbine engines, but they too. i think, so to speak, the americans believe that the russian federation can also help uh north korea in this matter. well, the last thing is the air components of the americans too they believe that it was not in vain that kim jong-un went to komsomolsk-on-amur, looked at our 35-30-34 aircraft, which, so to speak, can be uh perform tasks on the ground or nuclear weapons, so the americans are already quite calmly talking about nuclear strand. although they haven’t given it yet, like 4 years ago under trump they were just hysterical, if suddenly someone started talking about the nuclear potential of north korea and uh, returning uh to the possible owners of japan south korea who are also

, so to speak, not averse to acquiring nuclear weapons. that is, what i want to say is this nuclear non-proliferation regime. actually, he is already under a very big question. we generally have two treaties, only the treaty on the extension of the nuclear ban treaty, a comprehensive ban on nuclear tests on nuclear tests. again, everything in the russian federation is digging tunnels. china is digging tunnels. we are on novaya zemlya, they have also, uh, already dug a new tunnel at their american testing site, but i have to say that , actually, uh, a nuclear test. well first, regarding the new land. so simply the president set the task to prepare. uh, a testing ground for possible tests, if, uh, the americans carry out their tests. in general , full-scale tests of nuclear weapons are carried out , and so on. some new new warhead is being developed , but our command and leadership have not announced what we will be

developing. something new the americans announced in their recent discussion that they would develop new low-power charges. well, low-power, so to speak, in the current uh, so to speak reality. in general, uh, the low-power one counts from one to 20 kilotons, that is, 20 km - that’s what it was dropped on the heels of russia, now it’s a small charge and power. that is, this is in our classification. these tactical nuclear weapons of russia , critical tactical or strategic , are determined by the carrier not by the warhead power of the carriers. that is, if this warhead is on a cruise missile, which is a ballistic missile that flies further than 5,500. this is already strategic, if uh, there are more powerful ones, the warhead there is on a carrier that flies 400 km. this is not strategic; we call it tactical; the generally accepted term is not strategic

nuclear weapons. that's why uh hiroshima nagasaki - what is this? well, at that time it was, so to speak, a low-power weapon. this is 20-20 kilotons, you know that. no, no, not a very serious weapon, which is like many american former, so to speak , military leaders, especially retired military men. they say, yes, that's all nonsense. the damage radius is small, but 100,000. of course it's a pity, but it’s okay, so to speak, it’s not a billion, and not 100 million, so there’s no need to be afraid. well, only he keeps asking for the use of tactical nuclear weapons. i'm here. well, after the headquarters of the historical building in sevastopol was hit by the black sea fleet there, by the way, today the governor annoyingly wrote that

the icon of miracles survived. well, he immediately starts on social networks. well, let’s take revenge on one of my colleagues. e hero of russia colonel klopov wrote what these blows are all about retribution what are we even talking about? of course the army doesn’t think like that categories. yes, you need to explore your goals clearly , systematically calculate and strike your emotions here, and the goals of achieving strategic and tactical tasks, fulfilling strategic tasks, are not your mother’s control of the bridges.

germany already has conditions. i think this needs to be stated publicly, to make a public protest that germany is a party to the conflict and is directly involved in this conflict with its armed forces, this will require that we present their military id cards or at least their faces so that they verify. well, let there be a conversation. well , one of them, it seems, gave testimony there, and in an hour, well, he died, after an hour, but he managed to say something, there should be a photograph. that is, where, of course, there should be a recording. well, let's see, there are professionals who should be doing this for what the germans supply. uh, naval drones. yes , conflicts are definitely happening in germany from the outside, of course, why are you inattentive to the needs of the russian state to use tactical nuclear weapons, tactical or

strategic? optical then strategic, but only then, as yakovlevny wisely says, when he considers a russian in the military and political leadership. this step is necessary. well, as i understand it, the military and civilian political leadership don’t think so yet. this step is necessary. i agree with this, maybe at this moment the bombers are already in the air. i generally agree with this opinion because if you hit germany, well, in germany , you have to hit the lairs right away, you have to hit the beaten states. this is the one who is the one who actually speaking, and leads is a conductor. and who, by the way, has quite serious reserves of these very nuclear weapons. both low power and strategic weapons. anyway. here this is the beginning of a large-scale large-scale conflict , there is no large-scale conflict, small ones are destroyed, and then

i am not useful that, like any weapon, nuclear weapons are a means of politics. yes , there is, for example, the first remedy is natal chickpea. well, this is the simplest thing. yes, i 'm dissatisfied with something there. and the rest is nuclear blow, in principle, to the modern world. so far we are yes, we are moving in this direction. we already have sanctions. they are closer to that end. well , i think that now there is no such need. masti, i just looked at what happened at the un general assembly in general , i would like to remind you that for another 10 years we haven’t discussed at all what happened at the general assembly. we talked about the fact that what the security council adopted there remained outside the sphere of influence of the general assembly. why did this become so when 10 years ago the cold war began, the second cold war, indeed, the general assembly turned into a battlefield. i say, i’m sorry , just so that someone can start talking about them. no , i followed the resolution, which mother is on this one and

actually accepted no, no, and we said last time that i couldn’t, all this is important, they couldn’t pass any resolution. yes and this is what my colleagues said during the speech. i just want to point out that our tv viewers understand that the general assembly itself meant the existence of this organization of the united nations here, as ruzulta decided, is a place to let off steam. whoever wants to go out there and say anything, it still has no meaning. receiving in this sense, of course, the general assembly is that now it is rising to the shield of the americans. this suggests that they are really now trying to take over the united nations organization, remember, yes, it was created to rule the world by four policemen. after that, it turned after the ninety-first year, the united states, in fact, was able to decide all. well, our current problems are rather, for example, with libya and so on. we voted for these resolutions in the

security council, which we did not attend and which led to war. well, that was then, i say, after the ninety-first year they restrained themselves, nevertheless. this was not vetoed . yes, let me remind you, what the resolution was about is just meaningless, therefore. they used it now without tidying up the security council, they want to pass their decision through the general assembly. in my opinion. uh, it can’t be reformed. this one is like trishkin card. well, if there’s just a needle there, it’s caught all over, the fabric will tear, because it was created under different conditions. this is a vestige of the previous world order and now there was only one reform. by the way, speaking in the sixty-third year, when they increased from 11 non-permanent members to 15

members, but there was still one reform, politely speaking, when suddenly there was another china. well, yes, yes, yes, this is not considered a reform, yes, the seventy-first year replaced one china in general , the representative of the chinese state became the place of taipei became beijing, this is not in essence affairs, not reforms. just oh yeah, reform doesn't count. this is an increase in the number of members. it was a reform. now they are proposing to expand in general, so to speak, this number of permanent members, some speak out and say one from canada , for example, here are 100 who advocate that there should be no dedicated members at all, increase the council to 25,000 dollars, which will not have a summer, then there is a security council in the current conditions. as long as he remains the way he is with the a, he will be exist. as soon as they try to change anything, it will all collapse, which is why it is

an eccentric system. they are gradually coming to an end. but what sergei vyacheslavrov said was different so far. we haven't done anything yet. here we will make some other system. we will build other mechanisms. then he can, he can refuse, because such organizations as ions, for example, even the osce. now there is a problem in everything. a very big problem is that the chairman will change in december. and in the place of the chairman there only one estonian foreign minister is vying, of course, we blocked this, and the chairmanship accepted there is appointed only by a unanimous vote of all members of the fbsi , in other words, the osce may bounce back in december. yes. we can at least, but now she herself will take us out of there. she will die calmly from the very beginning, because there is no security system in europe without russia. she can’t be the chairman, it’s not like she votes there. we must agree to it. we

blocked. we have to agree on this. could it be that you don't like your alphabet? we are now just before bed. there were a lot of drug addicts in the ranks of my unit. we said that the fighters who were running near me appeared in confidence in their actions in the same way, chaotically shooting at houses , shooting at windows, but i was. those pills that we saw are the most serious tranquilizers, fatigue, everything that is used in ukraine is made in a factory way scientifically -research institute and nato.