[000:00:00;00] the framework beyond the framework that is comfortable for the west for deducing this conflict within the framework of the concept of a hybrid war that is safe for them, well , for the last 40 seconds i read about hersh, i read hersh about the explosion of the northern streams, but i think that everything fell out there, versions started pouring in and again a new leak of incriminating evidence began, this is a moment of their temporary weakness, it is temporary, they will overcome it, but it is at such moments that they must not go to their house, not go into their shell, strike, as one, not the stupidest person in the world, taught our history, we must beat then, when the fluctuations in the camp of the enemies are greatest, i absolutely agree, with only one thing, well, not as an argument, but i’m not sure that

the captain... i just think that the unification of capitalism with protestantism gave rise to a new religious form, when they are convinced , that they have the right when they are convinced that the appearance of money in them is god’s chosenness, remember how they began to write articles with us, when avin, in my opinion, wrote this article, that in general, money is the same criteria, it’s everything is not by chance, not by chance. perhaps as cruel as capitalism mixed with protestantism, the world has never seen anyone else, so their diet is very limited, they are, if you like , religious fanatics who simply serve mammon, they sincerely believe that this is god, which is why they consider themselves to have the right to destroy everyone around, they consider themselves in the right

of others, but what i absolutely agree with is that we are now playing by... their rules, they are imposing on us the topic of the impossibility of using nuclear weapons, although in their doctrines, and not in ours, the prevention of a nuclear strike , they give us they impose this phrase that stop it, well, it may still be resolved, because they need to catch up with us, as soon as they overcome that gap, sooner or later they will eat it anyway, of course, they will be ready for complete they won’t think for a second whether or not to launch a nuclear strike on us. therefore, we need to stop being naive and this 30-year-old flapping of furry eyelashes, we need to stop hammering, we need to be tough and scary, and there will be better advertising

in the ranks. there were a lot of my unit drug addicts, they said that they were gaining confidence in their actions, the fighters who were running near me were just as chaotically shooting at houses, shooting at windows, you understood that we were shooting at the residents of mariupol, you understood, but i was on drugs, those pills that we have seen are serious tranquilizers, a person forgets what pain and fatigue are. everything that is used in ukraine is manufactured in a factory manner by scientific research institutes, nato ones, the same ape spray based on nalovubin. the cia is definitely continuing to lead similar activities all over the world. dozens of those same

biological laboratories in ukraine immediately come to mind. we will take on this case, it will be an honest detective story, we watch to explore the world, programs and documentaries, we watch,

we watch, in the application or on the website. of course, hersh’s investigation is unique, firstly, a man who received, well, probably everything that was possible in the journalistic community, his investigation, mocks how they tried to discredit him this year, but what he writes , he directly accuses the leaders of the united states, because they are international terrorists, he directly accuses... scholz , that he betrayed his interests, that he committed an act of treason, while we see how a year ago it was not just sabotage , and this is the largest environmental disaster, this is an environmental

disaster that pursued a single task: the destruction of the economic potential, the main economic competitor of the united states of germany, which happened with the knowledge and under the cover the man whom the people of germany, but mediocrely, chose as their own fugue, excuse me, this is called chancellor, yes , fugue let us down, andrei, by the way, furaud was also chancellor, the fifteenth chancellor of germany, i don’t know, that’s why, that’s why, this almost an equivalent concept, it’s just that in different historical eras they are inclined differently, hersh’s article, of course, she, well, supports her line, which was. and makes it clear that, strictly speaking, well , we had no doubts, but there was no evidence presented, as such, names cannot be named and he shows why they won’t be named, and the fact that there won’t even be any papers left, they remember the first time with

a computer they seriously got into trouble - in 1987 iran-contra, when they stayed there, they erased everything, here in in these networks, in the internal networks, a marmot turned out when there ... it’s quite possible that he even had a tape left, from which, so to speak, you can restore the text, i think that it’s not very big, i don’t know, in any case i won't, i won't speculate, but that was all

clearly, and to resolve this issue, well, it also arises, of course, it arose for me in general on september 2, 1717, as you remember, then remember what happened, they took away our property, squeezed out our property, san francisco, that is, the diplomatic mission, which belonged. but there is one such thing, you see, we exist not only in the world, we they, not only russia against the united states, we are surrounded by a mass of states that are located, that watch how politics is carried out, that they are analyzing who to join, so ask yourself a question, over the past year in russia, has it decreased or increased? in my opinion, it has increased for a simple reason: at the last general assembly, they were able to pass a resolution, anti-russian; at the last g20 meeting there in indonesia, they were able

to call russia the aggressor in the final declaration; this year they did neither achieved, they could not do either, diplomacy works in this case, i think that... diplomacy works and works quite successfully, again, if we don’t reduce the world to black and white, we are them, there are still a huge number of states, and states that are friendly to us, such as india, such as china, who look and evaluate how russia is taking the blow, yes, it’s difficult for us now, it’s difficult with this operation, but i think that at the present moment, that’s how march 1 suddenly appeared, you remember when he spoke in 1918, when... florida, not florida, he was hitting somewhere, right now there's talk of new systems weapons. of course, i can’t say anything here, i’m not involved in their development, i don’t know anything, it’s probably

being done secretly, but nevertheless, russia already said then that it had reached the level that the united states couldn’t get it, this is an indicator, now the indicators are different, here’s a new one. it turns out that f35 is worse than f16, much, you know, no, he’s good, he’s afraid of thunderstorms, no, well, that’s f35, they officially declared it, cap, i’d better go, which one now so to speak there are a lot of orders all over the world, they are looking at what is happening with this plane, it is considered to be some kind of fifth generation or something of the next generation, which supposedly does not exist anywhere in the world, strange miracles are happening to this plane, a new b-21 bomber, and some- then he made a flight there, but his program of construction is also delayed... construction, where the aircraft carrier

john fitzgerald kennedy, he was supposed to leave these stops, this year, they were supposed to accept him, well, undergo sea trials, and then he will be accepted composition of the fleet, so my question arises: whether we win in this or not, in the eyes of the rest of the world, and in fact, in the position that i don’t know, we have taken odessa in the last couple of hours, no, why, i think we will take it, nikolaev? the united states is acting unconditionally, or maybe a number of countries have officially begun to support us, sent troops and weapons? no, no, i mean diplomatically, maybe they imposed sanctions against america, britain, germany, someone listen, britain and germany will never impose sanctions, but then against these countries, maybe be one of our allies, something happened. we we, when we are introducing now, you know, maybe

turkey has left nato, oh, turkey, i don’t know, she, she most likely will leave nato, or not, this is a question for a colleague, a question for a colleague, i do the same too i think that it will never leave nato, but uh, in my opinion the situation, of course, this is a struggle, of course, this is a rather serious struggle, for example, what is happening now in the south caucasus, but in our opinion it was, remember , has always been called transcaucasia, yes, that’s what is happening in transcaucasia, i would note, well let’s say this was included in the american plans a long time ago, the construction of a perimeter, containment of the outer perimeter and penetration into eurasia, we are winning there too, no, but i think that we will defeat them there too, because it is not us who decide to intervene there, there, not only us, so to speak, there, if further , there is a corridor in the southern caucasus, it was always confirmed through the southern caucasus, penetration into central asia, and there were american bases, in uzbekistan and kyrgyzstan there were bases that

were quite difficult but we managed squeeze out from there, in the fifth year, then in the fifteenth year, and not only our interests are affected there, but here the interests of china and iran are directly affected, on this basis we can build more serious, so to speak, allied relations, when they have something to admit with whom, with iran and china, we now stand rock to rock, but this is not somehow not fixed with china, things will not be fixed, countries with their own interests, i want to remind you that not so long ago, iran completely i felt differently about the soviet union, of course, and i see it that way speaking, let me remind you that iran has very difficult relations with azerbaijan, and iran is also not easy there, and although the turkish authorities say that this is an area of ​​expertise, i will not intrude, but they say that if necessary, we will go through the territory of iran , they will bargain with neither one nor the other; a strong, powerful russia is not particularly needed in the region. nobody needs the united states

in central asia, it’s definitely not us at all, neither china nor iran, while the united states has well-established and powerful ties with both the iranian part and the turkish part, which is turkish generally belongs to their camp, well, that ’s why i apologize, they are treaty relations, they are treaty allies, speech, so i think that’s what they are like. you say, the relationship of positions, interests, then, when they come to you in the center of eurasia, they lead to the fact that a revision is taking place, as an adversary invades, who believes that china is an existential adversary, and we, and iran, are also written down for them, we are their opponents in law, so when the united states invades, there may be a union against them, and we wrote down somewhere, that they are our opponents, what are we? have taken some measures, we are somehow influencing,

for example, who is dealing with the south caucasus, mid? the ministry of foreign affairs cannot solve the problems that are facing, these are not its powers, not its competence, who are we to do this, we have relevant departments there that deal with the regions, the tasks that are formally assigned to the ministry of foreign affairs are not those that need to be solved now in the southern caucasus, and the word is completely, but the mit does not deal with this, speech, who does? we have a security council that is also involved, the ministry of defense, who deals with our peacekeepers, again, the ministry of defense also solves completely different problems , the ministry of defense can solve everything, the ministry of defense already carries out such a complex of measures along the entire perimeter, now a largely new architecture is being built defense, yes, we now have in finland, we now have, well, that is, of course , we also have the arctic, that is, the ministry of defense has made

a colossal breakthrough over the last year, and of course, no one is diminishing the role of those species that we have, who are working with us now. the caucasus, conditionally, yes, then the ministry of defense understands, the forces, means are calculated, it looks like what kind of army, what is the question here , the question of creating, recreating even the ministry for cis affairs, as it was, what it was called then, in my opinion, what is it, i don’t remember the official name, but such a ministry existed, mikhailovich sirov, yes, until it was liquidated, and the functions, as you know, were transferred to the presidential administration, they were decided there. at the beginning of this century, how to steer there, so in creating such ministries would be good, of course, at the present time, because we need to deal with our periphery, our periphery, well, look, there is an agency, and usaid is very active with a gigantic budget, we have the brilliant evgeny primakov and there is rossotrudnichestvo,

just compare if the funding rossotrudnichestvo sid, it’s not funny, it would be a mockery, it’s just a mockery, that’s why. they would be happy to work, but maybe they should be given a free hand, well , we have a task of ponies, for example, but what is their task to bring our like-minded people to us, our fellow citizens, our compatriots, no laws, no money, now one of the most serious, the same, most serious tasks , at one time, when the faculty was created, we were created for a specific task, we were created to prepare personnel for such funds, like the ebert fund, something similar that worked for us. no, they haven’t created such a fund, because because there is peace, yes, because there is not enough, there is not enough, there is a peace fund, a russian youth committee, so the point, the point is, that of course, such a structure is needed now, because we need to protect, in connection with john trudeau, trudeau, they already

have a general policy of the structure of what was called soft power, these are the structures we have that carry out this, don't we have them? cooperation, but cooperation grew, the budget is like what we said, there should be from such structures , there should be 100 such structures, absolutely, there should be funds, of course, whatever you like, please, funds, as the chinese once distributed now there is such a wide network of confucius foundations, which, in principle, include the study of chinese culture, the chinese language, and to be honest, of course, we could and would have to follow this path, if we are already... late, then now this needs to be changed, because the politics of memory, here in the west, over the course of just a few months, it is becoming, in my opinion, already purposeful, that is , there is some kind of common line here, which duda remembers about the liberators of americans in europe, yes, the funder immediately remembers

that russia is almost to blame for the bombing of kheroshima, and now it’s not almost, it’s to blame, well, yes, the fact that it can strike again, then now. after all, his last name is most likely, this is what the ess members honored for what they are trying, this is already a purposeful policy , which is directed, by the way, by samantha fauer, but note, here is another very important moment, when they are in all seriousness trying to push through the resolution, according to which they are ordered to forget that this performance took place, yeah, that’s it, well, if that’s the case come to think of it, this is a rewriting of history before our eyes, uh-huh, uh-huh. yeah, that’s why we now live in a new space, we sincerely think that when we utter some words , they will evoke a similar response, but this is not the case, we are even losing the common language of historical memory, in my opinion, we can’t talk to the west now only on the diplomatic front, that is, to negotiate some

kind of treaties, about something else, but it is pointless to conduct even a cultural dialogue correctly, so only nuclear weapons, well done, i say, nuclear weapons can wait. here you see, what are you waiting for, until they catch up with us in terms of their level of development in technological terms, when do you apply, that we will bypass them? why don’t we bypass, we have already bypassed into hypersonics , because unfortunately there is a logic, because they are screwing up, because unfortunately there is a logic of development and the history of the development of technical thought, military programs, i gave you right now, the americans have what - it doesn’t grow together, here again, don’t indulge yourself with illusions, i never write off the united states, now is the moment when you can say, now, of course, there is an advantage, let me remind you that vladimir vladimirovich said that we understand well that this will not last long. we are dealing with a systemic, serious, very prepared enemy, who has gigantic

scientific and technical power, this must always be taken into account, we must not think that we will throw caps now, but we will not throw caps, we will get the answer now, as long as the answer we can receive is not compatible with the blow that we can deliver, but after a while, unfortunately, they will have the opportunity to respond, inadequately, then not much weaker, this must be understood, now we have superiority , and then the question comes to the military, their calculations, what, where, how, when should be done, so here is the scope of use of nuclear weapons, for me, as an amateur develops into two components, political and military, and the first and second require deep, specific professional knowledge, which i am sure exists, our general staff, our military already understand our politicians perfectly well, they do not apply,

therefore, when they use you will know, but they do not refuse to use, talk in civil society about the inadmissibility of the use of nuclear weapons is a narrative that was introduced into our society by westerners back in the late eighties, early nineties, there is no need to make me a pacifier, because i have always said that that nuclear is an instrument of policy, first of all, you are already using it, so to speak, as an instrument of strike, well , war, in fact, where the war begins, politics ends, but we also have fields for carrying out policy, a framework for this, just war is one of the means of implementing politics, yes, yes, well, in general, the narrative was introduced much earlier, not in the eighties, not in the nineties, but the fight for peace from which no stone will be left unturned, we started, all with

when we came together as young students as students, we began an irreconcilable struggle for peace, this was the core, meaning and significance of all soviet policy in the struggle for peace, if anyone doesn’t remember, you can re-read the files of newspapers, magazines, journalists, i wouldn’t be surprised if gaidar i wrote about it there, well, that is, i just the main last one as a joke, that’s it, but you’re asking the question correctly, when you said at the beginning of the conversation, when we stop batting our eyes, you just need to understand that this is not a one-time process, it’s well, we ’ve now established it, i think there are no arguers, yes , that we began the pacification of our society, together with the goal of increasingly satisfying the needs of this society, from the end of the fifties, and well, count, yes, well, let’s say, that is, this only works out until

the ninetieth 30 years, yes, and even, in fact, v in general, in ninety and ninety-one, gorbachev put an end to it, said that there would be no more war, we ended the cold war so that there would never be a war at all, and this is how the soviet people were deceived, well, we have been telling for 30 years that we are against war and they sang songs about whether the russians want war, we are really against war, but this just... has a completely different projection, the second: how much are you against war? where is the border when war is inevitable? comrade dean said: the war begins, politics ends, i think that this wrong, i think this is an outdated concept, but at least it ended in the 19th century, because the entire 20th century was a century of war, there was not a single window of peace.

the whole century and back in the twenty-first, already 24 years, it continues, the hundred-year war , that is, we live without a politician, in principle, well, at least 100-plus years, in one process of war, in fact it would be necessary somehow think about this a little, but instead we began to fight for peace, so, well, yes, society is... what it is, and how much is it generations? look, well, 30 years of soviet, and maybe even earlier, so to speak, because the great patriotic war was really very difficult for us, well, it ’s true, and for any veteran, including my grandfathers, and in all families, when on may 9, on other holidays were gathered, one of the toasts was, and the verdict was, if only there was no war, let everything be deep, that’s

why, well, plus, of course, that same notorious society. consumption, that’s where life gave a person to get pleasure, well, with this society we rolled in, but we started its transformation in 2000, we started, but this , this is very difficult, this is not an easy matter, dear friends, i am pleased to invite you to our new release of the author's program besagon tv, which will be called mil-pardon under blanket, i think it will be interesting,

i look forward to our meeting. why are you pestering me, what do you need, a wind remover, i worry every time when he leaves, but he comes back. he promised me,

soon, today dmitry anatolyevich medvedev said about 325 thousand volunteers, well, come on, to make it clear in detail what i’m talking about, just imagine, yes, we had mobilization last year, a year ago, by 300,000 more, right? in principle, we are now building an army with the necessary forces and means, including modern-type personnel for fighting at the front. army operations, we are only building, excuse me, please, comrade general , maybe i’m using the wrong terms, but the essence of the matter is probably clear, what i’m talking about, yes, that is, armed forces capable of conducting front-line operations on a continental scale, well, imagine that such a goal would have arisen in the eighteenth year or in the nineteenth, well, so it was announced, do you think the military

didn’t understand, or what? and i want to ask you a question: remember , when sergei kazhugetovich arrived in the nineteenth or twentieth to the military registration and enlistment office and when he found grandmothers there with teapots, well, everyone else, but nothing happened with the military registration and enlistment offices then, and it was not by chance that this did not happen, not well, because if it had started to happen in peacetime, there might not have been any bones to collect, and the enemy would have learned a lot, well, at least i would like to name these two factors , which are completely obvious to me, well, imagine, we mobilized last fall, well , we had to announce the situation when, indeed, for everyone in the country, well, the problematic situation became obvious, according to at least the overwhelming majority, but imagine a few years ago that we had