[000:00:00;00] this will be a record, cut it, on the verge of possibilities, we are all with him, because he is the only one, at the maximum height, don’t go higher, you’ll just fall like a stone, with the speed of the wind, this is a super cyclone, a killer cyclone, it’s like he’s chasing you, what do you want, lord of the wind. we watch to learn about the world, educational programs and documentaries, we watch,

we watch. in the application or on the website. we need to clearly understand that to live with wolves, to howl like a wolf. if we have predators on our border, we must understand that herbivores you can only be there up to a certain point, because when they start behind you somewhere , right? and you don’t show your teeth, it only encourages them, among predators, among predators, yes, and we became herbivores a long time ago, but somehow, that is, we became herbivores a long time ago, we are stories, from ladaga, novgorod, or something like that to the pacific ocean and to the baltic, no, the question is not that we are weak, look at the

serious one. what is happening now, where our people are dying so that a truce suddenly arises, we leaked what soldiers, officers, liberating the original russians. some kind of hint, we need to come to an agreement throughout the global north, with the americans, with the western europeans, we will all be united together one day, and what does this say to those people who are still thinking about whether they will be merged or not, that somewhere in power, and a person

who was involved in ukraine at one time, there is a leak in power there, because we must someday become a united north, so isn’t now the time to agree with them about this united north? the only mistake, no longer in power, the word at all, if everyone perceived it that way, already in deep retirement, well, objectively speaking, but i have nothing more to say, no, no, but the idea of ​​leaking, well, that’s... or in some other form is constantly thrown into society, because there is a passionate desire to make peace and stop before going back. here something else is dangerous, here it is dangerous to replace america with china, here it is very dangerous to think that we will now run from there to here, this is how we used to put all our eggs in the anglo-saxon basket, now

fold into chinese. yeah, this is also very dangerous, you need to finally realize that you are a bear who loves your taiga, rely on your own strengths, formulate for yourself once and for all your own national interests, identify enemies, and do not hesitate to call enemies enemies, then there will be no desire to merge with them, but we are still unlike, let’s say, other... countries that directly define themselves in legislation, who their enemies are, we don’t have this, we don’t have that, i mean, in general, who is our enemy, who are our enemies? yes, that's why i say herbivores, we, we are bears, this is the legacy of the nineties, which were not, not herbivores, but treacherous, and the bear is gradually finding itself, well, if we have such a theme, with the global north, i honestly don’t think so

i understand, by and large, for example, today we had a meeting with part of the global south , the first model of the league of arab states was opened at the university, representatives of embassies were present here, seven ambassadors among them were opened by viktor antonovich sadovnichy, this is what us turned svo, yes, indeed, we were all the time oriented towards that very north, we all the time oriented our students to the fact that they would be europe there, the united states, by the way, they made a gigantic mistake, that’s a gigantic mistake by blocking that exchange this student who walked because he always walked through the same gate, usually russia or the soviet union sent their own there. very few people came to us and, as a rule, they were already either graduate students or they were teachers, that is, people with an already mature worldview, with rank, no, even without rank, but yes, perhaps, in any case

, people were sent there, now they have blocked this channel themselves, because in the very years of the cold war, with the aggravation of the cold war, fulbratov’s program began to work in russia professors. who came here, gave lectures, and there were agreements that these lectures concerned only the 19th century in american history, we are not going to the twentieth, but nevertheless, there was constant communication, and thereby, so to speak, they formed recruits came, but everyone passed, every americanist who graduated went through the fulburt program , according to, well, in short, it’s not, it was, it wasn’t a secret, that’s when they covered it up now, that is, they actually blocked for myself, one of the channels of influence, i think that this is positive, and the fact that we are now working with the south is also very important, then, of course , today i was surprised, i thought that we have one main botanist in the world , this is in the european

union, the one who plants gardens in the jungle, and he considers the european union to be herbivores, a few days ago he said that the european union lives in a world of predators, so we need to sharpen our teeth to create... in fact , almost an armed force, it is clear that jazep has gone too far, there were many before him not jazep, he is jazep, well, i say, he went too far and he began to say those things that many people had said before him, but the americans quickly turned it down, because there is one union, the north is already united, if we use this terminology, true, it’s called the euro-atlantic, that’s where russia fits in, well, we fit in, but in the nineties, and even in fact, there we talked about managed democracy, more since we have defined our place, an energy superpower, thank god, so to speak, they made it clear to us and we quickly abandoned it, and the fact that our president tried to now carry out this

turn to the east, of course, this turn is very serious, because russia tried several times to turn there, the one mentioned the russo-japanese war is exactly what the british did to turn us back. but notice how involved we were then and now in europe, and many now consider themselves europeans, then not a single corps was removed from the european part to be transferred there, the siberian corps and the cossacks fought there, in fact, with the regular japanese, the japanese army, and pymik was considered a european country, constantly participated in these scenarios, by the way, these scenarios led us to the first world war, for what interests are we did you fight there in this war? we lost the country, and in this war, in fact, no matter how we treat it, we lost the country because of defeat. in a row, russia couldn’t, what interests did we defend when

we invaded this war, why did we come to agreements with the british, who had secret treaties against us that they knew about, we had the most important interests of the basphorus and the dordanelles, these are ours interests, yes, the war ended, we were one step away from it, half of the geopolitical problems would not exist now, but it is so didn’t end, it didn’t end like that, that’s right, because you get involved in a war, winning, using everything for this, if there were nuclear weapons, then you should have shunned them with nuclear weapons, and those who would say don’t dare use nuclear weapons, you should have unfortunately, the fact is that there were no nuclear weapons then, even in the second world war, but there were those who said that there was no need to use all the weapons that were available. then they put non-nuclear weapons as an easy reason, but, unfortunately, they didn’t put them in russia, otherwise if there hadn’t been all this mischief that led to the collapse of the country, well, it wasn’t a scam, but an absolute scam,

moreover, it was ridiculous to even consider the bolsheviks as factories, they were not the main worrying moment, the betrayal of the elites at the highest level led to this, including the military, of course, as i say, the betrayal of the elites is primarily the military. yes, of course, continuing the topic, but i would like to move on, of course, the united states started the first world war, yes, because the level of hatred between the greats is so they refused to support on the flank, yes, because of personal grudges, that’s a big deal, but instead of shooting the emperor in the devil’s name, he made a show of it, and in napoleonic

it was the same thing, as it seems to be, it seems no, yes, well, it’s not being considered, well, chichagov was there, and so on, there were his own people there and he sat with kutuzov wilson, an englishman, an englishwoman always does shit, so he wrote it off directly, so to speak, to the emperor, then, that’s why there were always contradictions in the russian general corps, this is the first world war, great domestically, you read the memoir, you’re amazed, well, it’s real, if you look, yes, but there was a main commander, that there was a main commander, there was always a main commander, in any war there is always a main commander, drink to the world war, compare, but what to compare , the first world war started well, and the chief commander, excuse me, for the first 2 years, forty-one, forty-two, was the commander in chief, but such a miracle that he himself later said with surprise that thanks to the people for their patience, another people would have

thrown us off. quotes from stalin, yeah, well, i don’t i know, we probably need to express something like this, when we talked about the united states, condolences to the secret service employees , they work in terrible conditions, there the commander bites everyone on the floor, the eleventh person, biden’s dog, for every tasty thing she gets a promotion from us titles, but it’s clear, and most importantly good, chung chang, that is, karine jeanpierre, who said that the animal bites others because of a stressful environment, well, he’s right, listen, if the child doesn’t want to return home, he says i’ll climb a tree, i don’t want to go home, so when we now find ourselves in the stressful situation that exists in the united states, it certainly seems that this is your decision, which is the use of nuclear weapons, it would probably be optimal . although now, just forgive me, now i’ll show you what’s going on, this is philadelphia, the city of brotherly

love, tonight, the store was demolished, i think apple was destroyed, that’s fine, that’s fine, gregory, great, konstantin, that’s it they tore it down, clean, beautiful, democracy as it is, ram, pam-param, and they took it for it and turned off their iphone, they will now take them to court... they will say that apple allowed itself to turn off iphones, this is a crime, okay, notice this laughter in the background of the drug-addled girl, well, then everything is clear, by the way, note, no corruption, no criminality, no violence, this reminds me of the twentieth year, the first quote, so you can calmly wait, strengthening your position in the world, wait how when this... now everything has been achieved, achieved

krilensky, that he was driving early, would have burst in with the boys, but yes, probably so critically, so to speak, reaching a critical point, because what is happening at the moment, the united states, by the way, is on bainaa for the fifth case have they already opened a case against trump, really, or excuse me, but a fifth case has been opened for fraud, they won’t go to jail for that, it’s not a crime, but 250 million, that is, he can already shoot cobwebs on his knees and stars on his shoulders? they have a taganka there and the nights are full where they have it, so what goes on very quickly the disintegration of what was a serious system, yes, i admit that in the united states there is, firstly, complex power that has been preserved from the previous one, there is also a control system, this is a hidden state, yes, but there is the will to use it , in principle, the russian empire during the russo-japanese war , as we said, the power... was colossal, there was no political will to use it, judging

by the way they treat the fact that when we say, they will start a war there nuclear or they won’t start, they now have such a low threshold, what they are ready to use, there have been several such cases for them, there is iran, which does not have nuclear weapons, while, at least, as they admit, there is north korea, which annoys them, and until now, here i am now after that, as here, probably, this threshold would have already closed, but before that, before the agreement, before these negotiations , this threshold existed, that is, the possibility of an attack existed, they didn’t do it, they didn’t do it, because that’s what i said last time, yakov yosich, the military they won’t go, the military won’t go, because there is fear of a retaliatory strike, there is fear of using someone, and whoever orders the military , generally the president orders, the decision

is applied, the president makes, the minister of defense reports to him, accordingly, the justification is given by konsha, the right not to comply order army, well, judging by what milev did with trump, a precedent has already been established that when this country, when this country is doomed, i think, yes, only the period of how, so to speak, this agony of the united states will stretch out, he may be different, and there is no need to provoke them, so to speak, in the sense that it is necessary to bear the first blow, on the contrary, this is not a provocation, this is the protection of our national interests. so we protect our national mad dog, what do you think? commander, or what? well, when you see a mad dog, do you think of provoking or destroying? you need to call a psychologist, it’s you, you read this from the libs’ articles, you need to call a psychologist, you need to call a hunter, a hunter, but it’s better to use

your service weapon, do you have a service weapon? no, we'll give you parabu, na an ambush awaits us at the safe house, you will shoot back. let’s quote a book that our generation knows, but it’s not a fact that young viewers and listeners know, you started by talking about individual episodes that are actually connected to each other, very strongly, you said that it’s not entirely clear, is there still state power in europe under the conditions of the european union, they said that very strong conceptual changes are taking place, and you know, in connection with this you... an article was published by the editor-in-chief of wall street journal, in which he asks such a philosophical question, he says that the new moral order, as he called it, has ceased or is ceasing to exist, he describes it as follows: over the past

few decades, in fact, this moral order has been built on three such whales, this... this is hysteria about climate change and this is cultural suicide, in fact, he identifies three of these criteria, it is difficult not to agree that all three of these phenomena are today are under great attack, are in great crisis, but the reality is that we underestimate the scale of the changes we are in and think that we are talking about a change in morality. well, at most, we sometimes talk about the fact that concepts change, the reality is that it seems to me that in the modern world we are faced with the fact that institutions, mechanisms, constructs of the modern era are falling into oblivion, they simply cease to exist, this era in international relations , a lot of

what colleagues are discussing here, and andreich says, all colleagues in general often turn to these things, we ask questions, constantly use the language , institutions, constructions of this era, which obviously has not justified itself long enough, therefore, in general, postmodern philosophy has arrived several decades ago, but in international relations, in world politics, even modernity continued its existence so dominant during this period, i will give several examples there to make it clear, one of the main theses of modernity, which he asserted, because, say, in in the middle ages, economics was inextricably linked with politics, because the meaning of economics is the common good, it is christian goal-setting. modernism proclaimed that the meaning of economics is making a profit, therefore economics must be separated from

politics. in the modern world we see that economics is becoming less and less separated from politics, often serving politics, we know that one of the main criteria of modernity, one of the main constructs of modernity is the national state, and all the time even representatives in our country they are talking about the need to reform the united nations, probably we should try, it’s a pity to leave it there in any way to perish, but very large ones are already emerging. the fact is that in general the concept of nations, nation-states and so on, it is now viable, there is a feeling that all that international law, those criteria. and the principles that were embedded in it, they simply no longer correlate with the reality around us, and when we

try to reform an institution that is built on a concept that no longer exists in real life, but has simply ceased to exist, then we, in general, are unlikely to be able to achieve success here, and the whole question is in what direction the world will then develop, what kind of us prospects. an honest thought was voiced, i really haven’t thought about this topic, but if you look at it, yes, well, brazil, brazil is a sovereign country that has all the signs of a sovereign state, china is indisputable, russia is indisputable, the usa is indisputable, and france, and italy, these countries, they can to actually be present in the united nations, that is.

according to many criteria, they no longer correspond to the concept of a state as such independently , that is, the european union most likely should be present there as a kind of structure, and then with a truncated military function, therefore, even in this regard it cannot be present, that is, you are absolutely right, then there is now we need to look for some absolutely, it just turns out to be a community of unequal members, states, half of them were created by latin american ones, no, sorry, not at all initially, just at the beginning there were countries that had sovereignty, because, well, excuse me, you had it before there was a currency that extended to countries not related to it, when countries appeared that did not have their own you didn’t have any real national armies before.

there were a lot of drug addicts in the ranks of my unit, we said that confidence in our actions was emerging, the soldiers who were running near me were just as chaotically shooting at houses, shooting at windows, you understood that you were shooting at the residents of mariupol, you understood, but i was under anesthesia, those pills, a person forgets what pain, fatigue are, everything that is used in ukraine is done in a factory manner by research institutes, nato, here is the very spray apey based on bin, the cia is definitely continuing similar activities all over the world, dozens of those same biolaboratories in ukraine immediately come to mind. investment rating, economics, through

specific stories, we can reach people, we often talk about money, amounts serious, in russia there is a clear and clear signal, at what point will you say, i did everything in this project, everything i could, i will never say whether russian industry is capable of replacing foreign suppliers, it is necessary to mobilize... give all the resources the recipe in general, this is how to achieve what you have achieved, do you think that you are on top of the world, you got up, dusted yourself off and went, is russia ready to change,

is evolution taking place in any structure? very often, i think, we make a very serious mistake, a philosophical one, when we start to think that the way out of modernity is necessarily postmodernity in the form in which it developed back, and that if modernity ceases to exist, then the philosophy of postmodernity will definitely await us, in international relations there or through network structures , these transnational corporations will necessarily manifest themselves, etc. i must immediately state two important things in my opinion. first, it is incorrect to put these on a horizontal scale such that here is

traditional society first, then after that it comes modernity, and after modernity, postmodernity, they are located vertically, you can enter one society, another, a third, and if you also take into account that the world will never come a moment when the whole world will be in one of these paradigms, then we will understand that an attempt in general, in principle, to find something universal , some kind of device for the state, to find