you have to go there now, catch all those degenerates, come up to everyone and ask why the hell did you take this, you bastards? cool, vladimirovich, but the fact that you don’t agree with me doesn’t surprise me, i’m saying that the state duma should, in my opinion, repeal that resolution of the supreme council of the union of soviet socialist republics, that’s all, but what if it didn’t do it, then there is nothing to be offended when others say that you and hitler ended up

in the second world war, absolutely vicious logic that has no relation, the foreign policy of the state is not dealt with by the state duma, but by the president and the ministry of foreign affairs, therefore, statements regarding the foreign policy discourse there are certainly not the prerogatives of the state duma and does not mean that others, including the president and the minister of foreign affairs, should not speak, well, we have it in the duma, so by the way, our state duma understands the laws. by the way , our law is signed and comes into force after it is signed by the president of the russian federation, but they come into force only after, the president is what is in force between, laws come into force only after signing by the president and publication of official sources, parliamentary i can continue, the law is also in force, i can continue, can you, can you as long as you can, can you?

it is on may 9 that he is not officially mentioned, maybe we will finally appear, because of this he is equated with hitler, they say, well, you yourself talk about him like a dictator, children, maybe we will accept the chinese formula, 70% right, 30 wrong , and then show me a major politician who is 99% right, third, and where we ourselves equate him with hitler, we have separately passed a law , which for this they equate with the heiter, i say that on may 9, in not a single official speech on red square on the occasion of victory day, the end of the great patriotic war, stalin was not mentioned as

the supreme commander, as the head of the soviet state and in general as... by last name, first name and patronymic, they use this, then according to history, our pharaoh stalin was convicted, no, i say that he needs to be mentioned, but you say there is some the difference between the mentions, putin mentioned several times by may 9, both the supreme commander-in-chief stalin and the name stalin, yes, let me finish this, well, mention him. yakov iyovich will tell you, he also advocated for this many times, the next thing is to stop speaking , i will speak, correctly, but apparently you are also speaking out of nowhere, it turns out there is no problem, we must stop all criticism of the soviet union, i would say so, on for the next 10 years , stop all criticism of the soviet union, there were problems there, and gorbachev, as an exception.

the cudgel of khruchev, who acquitted bandera, you also led not to criticize like that, well, you are all tactful as you are, and khrushchev is a soviet leader or not , well, well, or should i forget stalin’s repressions against the clergy, and also a wide variety of excuses, forget too , so you can update, you can update, but why update the soviet union, well, this is the soviet union, everything is against it, it’s clear what i mean , well, it’s clear that you don’t want it, you don’t understand , just agree, give it to me, at least soon, they gave the floor and invited me to this program, what’s the big deal, we weren’t invited to a lecture , it’s a discussion club, but i’ll just say a phrase, it immediately starts, what bright phrases you say, he didn’t interrupt, so... criticism

the soviet union, obviously, what i mean for 10 years, after 10 years it can be allowed again, and in general we can no longer talk about our past, but about our future, they ask, i will not give here, now there are some recipes, this is a separate interesting topic, and the last thing i wanted to say regarding the future ours, one of the most important questions to which the population, society, our country is waiting for an answer , in some places it is turning into the island of lampedusa, it needs to be radical. and change the migration policy as quickly as possible, radically and as quickly as possible, if someone disagrees with me, there is sergei mikheev , who also says this, as a rule , they don’t argue with him in this sense, thank you, about the lampedusa, not sport, not means that

he loves about the lampedusa, not only to change migration policy, but to realize that now, in the current funding structure, the ministry of internal affairs of the russian federation is not able, even if it wants to, to perform the functions that are necessary for these structures to work, just look at the salaries of the guys, you can’t find a person now who will go to work as a district police officer, this is a crazy problem, so of course, on the one hand, we need to look at who we bring, on the other hand, look at how they behave here, naturally, this is a very big problem, just like i say there with the guys from the russian guard, they say, volodya, really. there are a lot of good relationships, that is, we are all for our homeland, we understand everything, but our salaries are such that it is good if the wives work, not like in the army, significantly lower, and the tasks that

the guys solve are very important, also related to a colossal risk to health, they are fighting, they are deciding on russian territory, that is, we now need to harmonize everything. this does not mean that we need to downgrade, god forbid, the ministry of defense is great for paying and paying out combat and etc., but we need to pull everyone else up , otherwise we will lose everything inside the country, well , now it often happens there, internal affairs officers take bribes in batches, there are 5,000 rubles, 10,000 rubles. you start asking what his salary is, but it ’s awkward to say, does this mean that the excuse has been taken? no, but if we want people to feel confident in the future, we probably need to think about how we pay them, what kind of social package, that is, this is such a complex problem, that is, it is necessary for it look broadly and you need to solve

it, so think about it, by the way, in the nineteenth year there was a statement by the russian ministry of foreign affairs regarding the ribentrop hammer pact, thanks to the soviet-german non-attack agreement, the war began on strategically more advantageous borders for the population of this territory. succumbed to nazi terror, were saved 2 years later, soty from life, so state structures regularly, meade’s statement does not cancel the decision of parliament, but isn’t it higher in matters of foreign policy, of course not, of course yes, because this is a mit of a modern state, and a statement by the parliament of a state that does not exist, by the way, the soviet union was a parliamentary republic there in general, it was a soviet republic, who is it telling, what are you talking about, what was the constitution written into, parliament, supreme council , well, why are you making this up, in any case, this is not a resolution of the parliament, who was, again, the congress is

the parliament, the parliamentary body, was no longer alive then its principles were at the basis of the meeting of electors, you understand? state the establishment of a parliamentary republic, practically no one takes this into account, and the fact that the genseiki were the first persons does not mean that brezhnev had a problem for him, why did brezhnev become the chairman of the supreme council, because it appeared in the protocol, so who ruled the country then? if this is a parliamentary republic, who ruled the country? kalinin? who controlled the politburo then what? politburo, which really, which

really wasn’t even spelled out in the constitution. ruled by the top, ruled the soviet union, who? officially, supreme advice, no, no, no. no, the supreme council, the parliament that formed the government, the council of ministers, what are you talking about? but who ruled the country? well, why are you telling us fairy tales? now to krezhnev. to him, who ruled the country, it’s better that you come to him, we will all come to him someday, there is no doubt about it, to stalin too, but the question is something else, the question is fundamentally important, what can you come up with now, now the children are they will look at this and say, it turns out that the soviet union was a parliamentary republic, that pabentrop is a disgusting thing, the highest body is the supreme council, a permanent legislative administrative control body of the state, the supreme council is not parliament. this is the essence in general, you need to understand, you need to generally understand what the essence is, if you call two different phenomena in one word,

or one and the same phenomenon in two words, once again, the soviet union was a parliamentary republic, once again, it is an absolute bourgeois heresy, and from a person who demands that they talk about stalin, he now immediately demands that he repeat this nonsense, bourgeois, i won’t allow it as a communist, as a candidate member of the communist party of the soviet union, i won’t allow it, you’re a candidate member, and i’m a member, it’s because of members like these that we’ve lost the real state of workers and gods, if you listened to us, young people, you see , the fate of the soviet socialist union would have turned out differently, don’t be afraid, they supported gorbachev, supported you after, no, excuse me, long before me, i never supported gorbachev, and by the way, she is there too, in this regard i was consistent throughout my you have on personality reduce.

the paris commune is also a parliamentary republic, right? the paris commune - it’s not enough that you suggest that the russian people follow the path of alien political technology terms parliament, come on parlars, yes, i think that you have and what do they think for a minute - this is not a russian word , assembly, that assembly is not a russian word, one of the few that it is essentially in fact , for you, the bourgeoisie is one thing, but for us proletarians, parliament is another good thing. the soviet union was the chairman of the supreme council of the state, the head of state, this is not

it means that a person has the supreme executive power, the government and the chairman of the government had executive power, it was the head of the executive power, formally, it really doesn’t matter , you see, here was the sixth article of the constitution, that’s right, he said that the soviet union cannot be a parliamentary republic , lenin denied bourgeois parliamentarism and stalin denied it because, unlike some, we are quite familiar with the creative heritage of our leaders, well, such a heated discussion, and on such a pressing topic, just burning.

about lampedosis, you know my position, yes, but it’s just so good that seryozha doesn’t interrupt in the middle , there’s advertising here now, then, i ’ve been working towards this all my life, we expect to meet it in 10 days, this will be a record, cut it, on the edge of possibilities, we are all with him, because he is the only one, at the utmost height, above? don’t get up, you’ll just fall down like a stone, at the speed of the wind, it’s a super cyclone, a killer cyclone, it’s like it’s chasing you, what do you want, master of the wind, well, vitalich, my position on lampiduses, as it were, and immigration policy , you know very well, i don’t change it much, much, much... i think that we don’t have a clear migration policy that meets the interests of the country, or

at least not enough, but every program is about it’s impossible to say, so i’ll just start from that heated discussion that was very relevant, which was here in the previous part, about the soviet legacy and so on and so forth, well, not being an apalagete of the soviet system, nevertheless one cannot help but admit, of course , what the soviet union is a completely unique project and has had enormous, amazing achievements beyond any doubt, as well as amazing failures, one of which actually ended it. but your proposal, as if clear in meaning, is unacceptable in form , and you say that any criticism of the soviet union must be canceled for 10 years, here it is necessary to explain very seriously and so to speak, all these things, with which i am ready to agree, with that that any suicidal and self-destructive theories and systems of argumentation, so to speak, of the country undoubtedly should be subject to, at a minimum, revision, and at maximum , maybe a ban somewhere, yes, and the question is not

about lying to each other about how good everything was, the question is not, so to speak, that for example to hide real shortcomings and... not to justify absolutely obviously negative things , so to speak, but to develop , it seems to me, by the way, it is developed, well, in life, to develop an objective approach to achievements, so to speak, and failures , mistakes of the soviet union, so that achievements apply and develop, and avoid failures, how to take them into account, so to speak, in your policies, and so on and so forth, but perhaps awareness of soviet history really requires a more systematic correction, without idealizing it and without demonizing it, i agree here, but also to cancel, how could it be right there, this very slogan of yours right now, so to speak, it’s just that we ’ve been living in different realities for a little bit now for a year and a half, but right away your slogan will be pulled out, let’s say they’ll start to hit everyone on the head with this slogan, you know, themselves you see, yes, this is pure propaganda, as it were, yes, which will work against us, by the way, regarding propaganda, like slogans, everything else, a very important problem was raised here at the very beginning, regarding search engines, the internet, everything else, yes, we must realize a little that

we really have a public opinion , especially among young people, to a large extent and not just spontaneously, including thanks to our school, secondary, elementary school, high school, higher school, as it were yes, so to speak, everyone who has children of school age or recently were of school age, everyone knows perfectly well, yes, students, everyone knows perfectly well, as teachers in schools now say, find this on the internet, this presentation, so to speak, take it from the internet, look for this data for your report on on the internet, but for yours... seminars seem to be yes, look on this internet, and what will he find there? this is a question, especially with regard to historical topics, humanitarian, as it were, cultural everyone else, so far, unfortunately, as it were, yes, we this - in my opinion, they haven’t done enough work, and some standards are being introduced there, so to speak, but nevertheless , rethinking is also required here, stricter control, not from the point of view of closing everything and that means, so

to speak, caulking, but in at least all the political, historical, so to speak, connotations must be corrected, because what you have so far... it’s not just unacceptable, it’s monstrous, it’s monstrous, it seems to me that even hitler himself, so to speak, was offended there in the next world when utkina they call him a neo-nazi, so to speak, yes, and hitler is simply a politician, this is monstrous , because this is an absolutely conscious reversal of emphasis, distortion, this is called a historical lie, this is how historical lies are formed, allegedly like russian search engines in reality, as if in disguise , correct... i don’t know how this happens, whether there are, so to speak, special people sitting there, so to speak, and that means compiling similar, that means, a list of accents, which ones are necessary, which ones are not necessary, or whether the program substitutes this way, even if they're looking into this the corresponding, so to speak, competent authorities, but it is clear that the authority is not up to this , it’s bad, because it needs to be before this, this is the formation of public opinion, so when we know, here we spend hours, so to speak, on all channels

refuting fakes , there are the so-called, stupid word, by the way, but nevertheless, listen, this... yes, in which tens of millions of people live, it is simply not just overflowing with this, it is permeated with this from top to bottom, so to speak, yes, it is impregnated from top to bottom, like a system, this system demands, demands change, otherwise, no matter how much we talk to you here, as if yes , small, so to speak, our children, then growing up to teenagers, then students, they will still be there looking for all this, that andrei decided to check us, no, i checked on google, and the same thing, yes the same thing, it’s like an absolutely american system, so to speak, yes it’s clear and i will never believe in its non-partisanship and so on and so on with these things we need to be very active, because we can, you know, patch up such holes the most obvious, you know, like the checkpoint, you know, this is the military unit , next to it, as if all the holes are clogged, in the back there, come in

, whoever wants, so to speak, the rear rear, there on the side behind, as if the whole fence is full of holes , yes, but at the checkpoint, the boss arrived, everything was painted, as if normal. came, had lunch, left, this approach here, in my opinion, is completely , completely unsuitable, uh, it’s extremely important to do this, and it’s true, we joke here, we joke, but our efforts in this area are very slow, very ineffective, it seems to me that we underestimate these things, yes, and so, well, really, so to speak, about money , well, money was allocated for this, some for someone, yes, maybe not the same there should be, but the essence, the essence is that this is a task of primary importance, because but my friends, it’s just a little unfair, they have no way to know this, imagine, yes, in universities, there, relatively speaking, the highest school, as it were , they were taught for years by people who,

therefore, history and the humanities they taught based on the grants that they received from, as it were, distant organizations, they write things like this on the internet, and until recently it was even worse, by the way, there are very accents, so to speak, i think that specially appointed people sit there, even in our search engines, they place these accents, because... the accents don’t appear on their own, or is it a tracing paper , again, from google there and from everyone else, they just take the tracing paper, so to speak, transfer these bases here and there, all that stuff, about the last one, so to speak, about canada, yes, it really seems like it’s good that all this happened, yes it’s wonderful, questions from canadian politicians, yes, they are, this is a question for children, yes, but how did it happen that this wonderful one is in quotes, so to speak grandfather lived and lived in our canada, because my friends, the american and your intelligence services have been systemically... at least since 1945, and maybe earlier, which means that everyone, as it were, were collaborators who left for the usa and canada from

europe, were moved knowingly or with direct support of the american intelligence services, and the us cia, in particular, so to speak, when it was not there, as if it were still the predecessors of the cia, and then the us cia dealt with them there, why to canada, because there really was a fairly large historical ukrainian diaspora, firstly, and secondly, because it was quieter there, it was possible there. these centers , so to speak, of bandera ideology, they were nurtured there all these decades, radio stations in the ukrainian language were created there, literature was published there, so to speak, with american money these intellectual, quote-unquote ideological centers were created, and as soon as the soviet union began to shake, as soon as i saw, i personally saw ukrainian nationalists at a rally in kiev even before 99, they were very active, not i have to think that it’s been since 1991 that they crawled out into the street, nigga. so you can even ask, so to speak, those people who live there, i’m a native muscovite, yes, they were very active in the second half of the eighties

as soon as perestroika started, they all immediately went crazy and so as soon as it became possible from there from canada in the first place , all this crap began to be transferred to ukraine in blocks of cars , including they played one of the main roles, as it were, in what that means the ideology of post-soviet ukraine which had a chance that we gave them a chance to actually become a relatively prosperous neutral country, but it didn’t take advantage of this chance, so to speak, and its elite, the so-called yes, turned out to be so stupid, cynical, as if sometimes, as if, okay, i have different epithets, but that means , in order not to understand what a historical chance they missed, well, it was precisely this ideological, as it were, and all the baggage, from there from canada that was transferred to ukraine became the foundation for modern ukrainian ideology, the latter... i want to say, as far as i understand, in canada this incident occurred primarily as a result of the reaction of jewish organizations, i am not jews, but to be honest, i don’t understand the position of many

international jewish organizations about what is happening in ukraine, i would like to say, listen, if you, if you have any principles, then regarding ukraine and what is happening there, you should have the same reaction, there should be the same reaction, otherwise it is a lie, otherwise you have no principles, but something else. i’m not a jewish organization, i’m just a jew, but i observed and said that in ukraine from the first moment, i’m not talking about that, here are a number of people who have now left our country, jews by nationality, and who suddenly begin wring your hands when you tell them, well, they say, but no, stop it, you, well , he wants to say, what happened since 1914, you didn’t see, the blood of donbass, no? this is no, no, i have a question, guys, are you sure that you are jews, well, just why did you go to israel?

and you went there because you feel the need to make an alley, you want to defend your historical homeland with arms in your hands, or you simply went for the right of free movement, then you are those jews who serve mammon, not him, think about it. boys, something is very wrong with you, the fact is that if i didn’t want to touch on this topic, but for example, in the american government, the same roosevelt, despite the fact that the country was dominated, so to speak, very widely anti-semitism was widespread, there were a lot of jews, and it is no coincidence that henry morgen was the minister of finance, who , in fact, tried to implement the plan of dividing germany into two, separating separate zones, dividing into two. because he is against the germans, because he is a jew. that's

all, as it were, justifies. because these anti-semitic organizations were active in the united states , so to speak, even then, therefore, when now the politics of memory, in my opinion, it should always have a state connotation, you know, when there were printed publications, when there was no internet, but the internet appeared in the year ninety-two, in fact, not so long ago , it appeared in the life of our generation, that’s when there were printed publications, there was a glavlit in the soviet union, and everything was certified, they underwent an examination, there were people there, textbooks that were published for students, for which not only the authors, but also the people who were responsible for the fact that they missed it, because really the state should care about how these events are interpreted, here is the example given with the thirty-ninth year, aka put it, it was just the desire of these deputies to do everything the other way around, to reconsider everything, no one paid attention to the fact that when this pact of rebentrop

moltov was adopted, it was secular. already fought, he already fought in the far east, and by the way, the war that ended, the conflict on khalkingol, it ended on september 16, precisely because they signed, signed this act, it was signed, and the japanese government decided not to continue, this was one of the factors that we did not have to fight on two fronts, but then this was not taken into account, everything that was white became black, everything that was black became white, remember, this passion of the white guard is very serious, that they fought and what foreign states did towards us, that’s all everything was done acquired a different sign, from a minus to a plus it turned the other way around, so the policy of memory about how this process occurs, it is very important, so it is not by chance, so i welcome the fact that i am not against the fact that we are not paying attention to it now, we would like to point out that at least now they have published a unified history textbook for russia, this is already important, yes, of course, now you have seen this picture,

when yakov is sitting in our studio before the start of the broadcast in the morning, carefully reading the textbook, and it is clear that he is still something to like about this textbook, this is a good sign, really, well, i liked some of the textbooks, but you liked which one, a high school history textbook, i looked a little compared to what it was, this is a step forward, you see, a little, already this it’s already good, i’m not deep into it. therefore, with those networks, i tried twice in my life to correct wikipedia articles there, but nothing worked.