for gas, we need russian companies as partners. how quickly this external good looks, with which they covered themselves, disappeared from the europeans, from all of them, in recent years.

not only diplomacy, but also elementary ones, but in general this is a manifestation of what is commonly called nazism, this is only in relation to russians, just like many other things are done in relation to russians, they say, not only putin guilty, all russians are guilty that they elected him, here you go, pure nazism, this is about ban on the entry of cars with russian license plates. european countries, vladimirovich, well, yes, and in fact, applause in the canadian parliament, when for fighting with the russians, yes, this is also an indicator, and they apologized to everyone, to jews, poles, gypsies, lgbt, racial minorities, except russians, that is, in front of him, well, it’s normal here, but it was possible to kill russians in those years, now, but i ’ll come back to this now, gunka, and now i want to say that i... with all due respect

to vitaly tovich and my love for soviet i think that the union, of course, should under no circumstances be banned, either for a year, or for 10, or for a month, to criticize, to praise, why, because there are some disputes and discussions, they are very relevant, especially now, that is, i, for example, i have always criticized and continue to criticize the soviet union for stalin’s policy of ukrainization, a very relevant topic now , especially in the south of russia, where... as you understand, there is also a discussion going on about which languages ​​should be made official in schools, and so on and so forth similar, that is, or i'm always critics the policy of the soviet union regarding, well, let’s say, hushing up, mixing up many crimes that were committed by various , well, nationalities close to the soviet union, national minorities, ukrainian militants, that is , as if we were condemning, but here... i don’t

go into detail all the documents were classified, all the newspapers of the nazi occupation of this bourgeois ukrainian government, collaborators were classified, i remember how i was the first to enter the special storage facility, when they were only declassified in the early nineties, that’s my hair were moved by why we didn’t have anything about this in... why we didn’t know anything about this , and by that time, that is , i say this again, they were just declassifying the beginning of the nineties, yes, by that time, as sergei alexandrovich correctly noted , everything was already there, seeded with these canadian embroidered uncles, aunties, this gunka, yaroslav, yes, he came to ukraine for the first time in 1989, he took part in the elections in ukraine as an observer, in the late eighties, at the beginning but no one says anything about it

we didn’t have any documents anywhere about all these guneks of all kinds and so on, that is, when the authorities handed over the kleynodas to the ukrainian president kravchuk, yes, then it would seem that if we had all these documents at hand, we would have seen, wait , well, this is being given by those same nazi collaborators who yawned at hitler when yaroslava stychko came from munich for all this shit, which means that yaroslava statsko, the wife of the same statsko, who swore to hitler on june 30, 1941, immediately took part in the elections, time of massacre of jews lvskikh, she became the oldest member of parliament, opened the meeting of the verkhovna rada, i say again, we only began to read, learn, discover much of this, by that time we were studying in all ukrainian schools in... in canada, with these

same gunka, that is, in the early nineties, when ukraine declared independence, yes , that is, there were no textbooks on the history of ukraine at all, approaching... for ukrainian nationalists, they imported textbooks by orest suptelny, textbooks published by foundations at the university of alberta, where, among other things, fund and yaroslav gonka, until recently , now this scandal has begun, the university of alberta is all that, we are all returning these 30,000 dollars, no, no, where did gonka get the money from? no, he built a business there, they all helped each other there in the diaspora, his son is a big businessman there, some kind of corporation, i can tell you which one, i don’t know, but why, that is, they everyone there is a generous comrade, the same chrystia freeland grew up in a family of nazi collaborators, they create there, they have public foundations there, by the way, i’m now

i’ll tell you about these foundations that at the university of alberta, it was at this university that published the first textbooks for ukrainian ukrainian schools, kindergartens, where the muscovites appeared in ruined kiev, the muscovites are destroying kiev, where it means we were enslaved by the russian yuri dololruk, dolnorukiy, which means there for some reason he became russian, although it seems that his grandfather is ukrainian, his father is ukrainian , but he became russian, and so on, well, well, that’s what you want, well, it ’s written in ukrainian textbooks even now, kids ukrainian, yes, yes, yes, of course, you you see, that is, vladimir the holy, yaroslav, now, now, grandfather yuri. suddenly andrei bogolyubov, russian, and so on, came from somewhere, yes, well, it doesn’t matter, i imagine if they came up to my grandfather and said, grandfather is ukrainian, he’s

a simple viking, he would swing an ax, what am i talking about, that this foundation published it, one of the largest foundations there. who created the encyclopedia of ukrainianness at the same university of alberta , you understand, and from this encyclopedia they created kubiyovich’s textbook, you can type it again where... full of photographs showing him with the nazi elite, he did not hide his own, his nazi views , and so on, and what do you think, today i went to look, so this fund exists, there is

a third of the government of the province of alberta, with this nazi, you know, who is, well , an open nazi, not like gunka, whom no one knew, who is full of photographs. where he is zigging under a swastika with nazi symbols and so on, so give me a long-armed mouth, who it comes from is, well, all the kiev princes, vladimir, that is, me why, why, and here they are, and now they are full of his grandfather, whoever you ask, but it’s not me who is now his father, vladimir monomakh, not vladimir manomakh, no, well, of course, a simple russian, a simple ukrainian guy, vladimir manomakh need vladimir manomakh is not once again vladimir manomakh ukrainian, and yuri dolgorukiy is russian, well, that’s it, that is, everything is simple, no, so you understand, that’s what they say, yuri dolnorukiy, which means your founded moscow, yes, we already had kiev, i always tell them,

wait, but he first captured kiev, and then moscow, why, i didn’t found it, i also squeezed it out, well, yes, too, but why am i, why are they now making faces, the report that was prepared in 1986 on all these hundreds of nazis, they are they didn’t hide when i’m digging through these documents now , at the same university of albert they were solemnly awarded in 2007, and

it said the galicia division, yes, that is, they didn’t hide the complaints of such guniks, you know, they now pretend to be surprised, you look where they actually came from, it's awkward. did trudeau know or not? chrystia freeland, who applauded there knows perfectly well. you and i don’t know the answer to another question, here’s the photo that the granddaughter published, where the offices are in the dressing room, the grandfather is waiting, and he had an audience, that no, but then they showed a photo of their son, the speaker of parliament and the head of the liberal faction i embrace this parliament well, the opposition leader claims that there was a meeting. this is her, he is on the same post of his granddaughter, who said that he is waiting in the reception room, but

the trudeau administration assures that this is the reception room this company, the speaker of parliament, is not there, well, the opposition says that the meeting took place before, based on this, zelsky knew exactly who he was applauding, it was not unexpected for him, well, when they told him that in the second, zelensky already understood who was in the second world war, he said, you will burn me, you, this phrase, by the way, farion about the fact that historically... the truth, you know, was sold to the jews, yes, as she said there, this is what they definitely need now to distribute, of course, well, then, really, you see, this could be a conflict will not end, but not a single western newspaper today, in any case, i leafed through and leafed through, did not report that zelensky named the battalion after kanavalets, that ’s not interesting anywhere, no, this is russian propaganda, it also says, kanavalets, nazism in ukraine, you understand, political murder.

in fact, this justifies him as a german employee, no matter how it was, this is not the point, again, what interpretation are all these poskoviks giving? in this, we somehow argued with vitelii tovich at the beginning, i still want to say that the advice is a mass an organization, not a parliament, quoting lenin, and stalin said that after all , soviet elections are different, but i agree with you, the supreme council from too, so i’m with you, he said something else, in general, read stalin’s speech, i think in december 1937, in the big theater, everything was said there, about the bogdanovs, and about the selifanovs , and as for criticism, i am also against criticism of the past, in general it should be forgotten, that’s what it is, i criticize the past or i don’t criticize the past, who are we to their position to criticize stalin or lenin, or cromwell, churchill or anyone, a machine operator, a dayarka, a partisan, who

were, which means we criticize them , now let us criticize, we would live then, we would criticize stalin, i i don’t know, it’s unlikely, you can’t criticize your past, definitely not for long, definitely not for long, although by the way it’s also exaggerated that under stalin there was criticism at all, there were discussions within the party, and stalin treated differently depending on the talent of the one who criticizes , the poor man’s spirit might have tightened, but he loved bulgakov, he loved him, therefore , now from my position, criticizing the departed dead is the same as criticizing the prophet moses, whether he did something right or wrong, we can make judgments, reflect on objective, subjective reasons, for sure, it seems to me that we don’t criticize, well, we don’t need to prohibit anything; we don’t need to define what criticism is, this goes to kant , now we have since then, and if we go to kant, then we are obliged to criticize, but if our mind is still pure, if if

we are talking with scientific criticism, but with us criticism quickly flows into criticism, i would say that in an effort to condemn, it is always necessary to take into account the historical fact, to understand in what historical circumstances in what layer of time, the phrase that such a topical discussion, if the conclusions of criticism, leads you to the need for suicide , why the hell such criticism is not needed, that’s all , in the life of one person in the country, society there and so on , so on and so forth, but objectively we need to understand, and here, that’s when we are all indignant now and do the right thing, what happened in canada, i like it, it’s a difference in style, yes, if you’re being screened, why the hell is it necessary , believe me, i can speak as if at an academic council, yes, that’s correct, although these are literary words, completely, about,

about everyone these canadian cases, we are surprisingly indignant, as if all this rehabilitation of nazism began, over the ukrainian issue, look how it all happened, they immediately after the war, the americans realized that they needed those who collaborated with hitler, and not snuland it started, there were reports, they are already tsruush, armenian, no matter what, they had dossiers on all of them and they decided that they needed them. take the same manstein, who was an adviser to konrad adenaer during the creation of the bundesphere, a man who gave these proven criminal orders, including in crimea to exterminate civilians, open nazis were advisers to leading politicians. the movement of revanchism is something that soviet, well

, propaganda, as they said then, openly fought; in western germany, there was a mass movement for several decades, tens of thousands came out to rallies for the release of ges from prison, from where ges became a symbol, a symbol of these neo-nazis among football fans, from there, western germany, they turned a blind eye to all this during that period, and, you know, there was such a jesuit logic, so they could pass sentences against certain nazi criminals, even death or life sentences, everyone knew where they were, absolutely, they somewhere advised some next latin american dictator, helped create the partheid regime in south africa, some reactionary regimes were consulting in the middle east , all this was normal, everyone understood perfectly well that these were scum, criminals, scoundrels, but they were

useful scum, during this time a whole system of argumentation was created that rehabilitated nazism, but how cunningly they did it, hitler, it’s impossible, and someone else, gerring , it’s impossible, for example, how did the extrication of ukrainian nationalists from babyn yar begin, from the entire ukrainian holocaust, to say, but not quite what to do with it, but how? well, in the world of women, that’s the logic, that’s it they say the scoundrels, you know, they shot them there, but they didn’t shoot them, that’s what they did, they hung up advertisements. there, in order to gather jews, they posted more than 2,000 notices, they posted notices, they didn’t, well, well, even if he didn’t, they didn’t know what he was doing, or like with us, for example, they tried to twist some of them, they shot them too , yes, and then they shot, of course, but they started with this, so to say, and you prove it, we say some policemen, well, he himself didn’t shoot in trostyanets, but what did he do,

escorted there, escorted, and then stood near the door, but this was accepted by society. first western, and then through this emigration, and the first wave was not dealt with there, the second wave was transferred to us, and not only to ukraine, it came to russia, where did these attempts come from in the nineties, to say that vlasov is a freedom fighter, but thank god, we stopped this in time, but a former policeman came to belarus in 1993, at that time the chairman of the rada of the belarusian people's republic in exile in ninety third year. and shushkevich, a party member, sat with this scumbag sazhich, one of the leaders of the policemen under the nazis , together on the same stage they celebrated the 75th anniversary of the belarusian people's republic, we all had this in the nineties, but in ukraine they didn’t stop it in time, somewhere in our country they didn’t notice

in the heat of the moment, well, details, but that we will really understand the past when a great future awaits us, and during the negotiations these were some marginalized people, well, these were some old people who arrived, why should we touch on this, it was like that, it was and now we are faced with this, well, that’s all it was, what conclusions should we draw next ? now we’re having a discussion, you see, i don’t understand, you ’re criticizing them, who, well, these scum collaborators, who i criticize when i still remember, when i lived , i don’t criticize that past, well, you criticize them for that past when you didn’t live, by the way , you’re going very deep into the further, we criticize or we don’t criticize, i must say one phrase literally, dmitry, in principle, was right that, unfortunately, the soviet government

had an indirect hand in this, for example, let's say, i'm sure you and i all grew up and didn't know that, for example, the village of khatyn was burned down by ukrainian collaborators, they didn't tell us this, because it was like breaking the pattern, moreover, when vasyura was executed, we too they didn’t know anything about it, he was quietly a figure of silence, which also worked for them , if we speak objectively, if we mention it now, here it constantly sounds, let’s grab it, then for one thing, for another, we’ll crush him, this means we will change something in higher education, let's turn to history, that is, now we have a normal feeling when a revolutionary process is underway to change what was twisted in 30, 40, maybe 50-60 years, but we must also understand that although the process is accelerating, it is not we can do this in a year or two; we have a lot of systematic work ahead of us. yesterday, on the program, koren

georgivich said that he is happy that some kind of revolution is going on, yes, this is called a revolution from above, when it is often forced, under the pressure of circumstances, with in the absence of any plan, and sometimes just with the feeling that you can’t live like this, you remember that popular... slogan of the perestroika period, yes, you can’t live like this, in fact, at some point, both russian and belarusian society felt, that to live like this, as it came from perestroika, post-perestroika times, which vitaly constantly talks about, and even he himself probably had a hand in this then, but now he is actively correcting all this that was fancy then, in that period, somewhere in solidarity with dmitry sheppelev, o which you said sorry. there’s no need to compare me with who the hell knows, i don’t know him and i don’t want to know, why this word is mentioned twice in the program, so i’ll make a parallel so that young people don’t need to,

draw a parallel for someone else, what are you everything for me, with kromel, you can draw a parallel, it’s very good to say that the bosses are not to blame, the journalist was to blame there, you re-read my articles of that time, so who elected the bosses, it wasn’t me who elected, and you didn’t vote in the supreme advice? do you know how you voted? there was a kalinsky district, a regional district in the city of moscow, kalinsky, it’s not central, yes, but gorbachev passed through another district, if only, if you understand the soviet electoral system, then vitalich, let’s go back to here , come back from me, yes, from you , returning to what we are talking about, in fact, now we are, just not at the beginning, but at the first stages of this big revolution from above, it will not end even with victory in a special military operation and in parallel with

the danger that sometimes sounds here is not to fall into the trap of these negotiations , you know what other danger there is, we will win and everything will stop there, and it will be the same as before, here we have been in belarus since the twentieth year, sometimes critics reproached you want to go back on august 8, that is, before the start, we don’t want to go back there, we understand. what mistakes were made, what was done wrong, what we should change, now the very important thing is to fundamentally get rid of this feeling, return to february 22, 2022, this, by the way, is what they want to impose in the west, they say, now russia will not lose, but we must not let it win, and what does this mean, and this means returning to that period, and this cannot be allowed, because this is a detail, but from this detail, jewish organizations

, not a single jewish organization represents either the jews or the jewish population, in any country, these are small organizations, small businessmen who gather, receive funding, and work for themselves, that is , some meetings, some speeches, no one has ever elected them anywhere, organizations in the united states, there are about 200, no one has ever elected them, a local oligarch creates an organization, it operates, it does charity work, it organizes some evenings, he, since he is the main one who finances it, he is its president, and then they all gather, and there is what is called the s of council, that is, the presidential council, where they choose the next one, oliggarh, depending on how many zeros he has after that, nine is better, nine is good, there are rarely fewer , that

nowhere they never represent the jewish people, in israel this is not the case, because we have a country, but they don’t, so they are busy with their own great affairs, so it’s okay to make any claims against them, for which they don’t represent anyone, themselves himself, but it’s customary that...’ this is a community , in this community there are some small, there are city affairs, well, it’s nice for him, this is another certificate for him to sit on the wall, he will introduce himself to all the titles , for example, i am the head of a jewish organization in detroit, everything is fine, their i’ve seen so much here and there, there’s no point in taking them seriously and nothing to expect anything from them, erwin kotler, i know him, he’s independent, he’s always been independent, he’s always performed. so he said, about canada, jewish organizations were silent, the first poles raised it, that it was poland who raised it, to

the honor of poland, the polish people can. to say, they raised, they raised this issue, to the shame of the jewish state, the jewish organization, they joined in the post, although it is impossible to compare how many poles these ukrainian nazis killed, how many jews, in general, incomparable things, but politics, i say, is a dirty business, you talked here about stalin, about monuments, well, it ’s strange to me. you can erect a monument to kolchuk, you can erect a monument to wrangel, you can erect a monument, this does not work, the whole people will accept it, but stalin cannot, and lenin cannot, with all respect for stalypin, the role of lenin and stalin in this state is incomparable, so why yes, and these - who

decides this or do they sit up there and say: no matter how much the boat is shaken, they will accept it all? what will be unanimous? anyone held a referendum in stalingrad, asking the residents, no, those who sit at the top, and are you in favor of returning your city, its name or not? no, they held a referendum there, when recently, by the way, did they hold a referendum, in what year? well, a year ago, they... unfortunately, not the result that i would like, and unfortunately, if i remember correctly, now we will ask the editors to bring out the result, then i don’t know who to complain to, i haven’t heard anyone speak out, candidate to, as they say, lead the city, said, in one of my points to return the old name to the famine city, no one dares, well, the twentieth division in which i was, are they from volgograd?

there is no one in the city who says, i'm going , you decide, this is your country, but if not in the elections to the municipality and one of my points, i will demand the return of that name to the city, so what?

i’ve been working towards this all my life, we expect to do it in 10 days, it will be a record, cut , on the verge of possibilities, we are all with him, because he is the only one, at the maximum height, higher, don’t rise, you’ll just fall to

down, with the speed of the wind, this is a super cyclone, a killer cyclone, it’s chasing you , what do you want, master of the wind, we watch to explore the world, educational programs and documentaries, watch, watch, in the application or on the website.