gabor where that's where where you saw and now you lost it and oh my god here.

this time i won’t ask about what will happen to odessa , although in hungary many people ask what they will call the neighboring country, from odessa, you have, no, no, no, you asked last time, yes, yes, yes, that's another question i have, what, well, well, please, excuse me, yes, yes, yes, that means, mr. president, we know that you are interested in history, so now i would like to approach the current reality , precisely from this point of view, and if we talk about history, then we know how important it is for the development of russia, precisely the fact that peter the great opened a window to europe, europeanness is part of russian

identity. of course, now europe is in decline, and is doing everything to prevent russia from falling in love with it, but seriously, as a european, it’s scary to hear the statement that some european cities should be subjected to atomic bombing, bombing, that today the euro, sometimes. what does europe mean to russia today? because this question is not about what kind of problems we have, about russia, uh, what does it mean today for russia, europe? will russia completely turn its back on him, and do you think that, uh, it would be a mistake to wall up this window?

and if we’re already talking about history, then another question is that if the new russian textbooks and histories caused a serious discussion in hungary, uh, more precisely, the lines about the year 56, describing what happened as a kind of color revolution, do you also think that the year 56 was not a real revolution, and do you agree with another controversial comment in the book that the withdrawal of troops from central europe in 1990-90 and 91 was a mistake. i remember, i know that in vladivostok, you said that the introduction of tanks was a mistake, it was a mistake in 688 and 56, but if this...

was a mistake, then do you think that this uh withdrawal of troops is also a mistake? you think that this is a question, this is a reason to write a dissertation, it probably means that you said that you will not talk about odessa, although you mentioned it, well, last time i abstained, i can say that odessa is, of course, a russian city , well, a little bit jewish, as we say now, a little bit, here, but - now we won’t get into that count, to reason, if you are in the mood to talk on another topic, then, firstly, to the window, to europe, you know, just now my colleagues were saying, the world is changing and climbing... all

the time out the window back and forth, which means pants tearing yourself, but not the best thing to do, uh, why climb through the window when there are other doors? this is the first, second, russia, without any doubt, well, the civilizational code of russia, just like europe, is based on christianity, this certainly unites us, but we are not going to impose ourselves on europe if it does not want it, we do not refuse, we his we don’t slam, you said whether we regret or don’t regret, why should we regret, it’s not us who slam... the door for joint communication, it’s europe that is fencing itself off from us and creating such a new iron curtain, it’s not we who create it, but the europeans they create it, at their own expense and to their own detriment. now, i have already said,

i can repeat, the economy of, say, the united states, it is growing 2.4%. and the european economy is going into recession, has already gone, and some european figures, who are definitely not at all positive, friendly, somehow towards our country, they give the correct diagnosis; prosperity was based on cheap energy from europe to develop the chinese market; prosperity was.

fundamental factors, which, all of this is certainly true, but europe itself refuses , i spoke about sovereignty in my opening remarks, you understand what’s the matter, because sovereignty has vector dimensions, that’s why we talk all the time, and i i keep saying that russia cannot exist as a non- sovereign state, it will simply stop to exist at all, because it’s not just about issues of military and other security, it’s about other components , that’s what happened to europe, many european leaders, no matter what they accuse, don’t accuse me of rudely attacking someone there or i’m shaming someone for something, the europeans themselves, many, say that europe has lost sovereignty, say, in the economic locomotive of europe, in a federal republic, but leading politicians have repeatedly

emphasized that after 1945 germany has never been in in the full sense of the word sovereign state, what does this lead to: in practice, including in economic life, it was the united states that provoked it, and i think that i have no doubt that it was they that provoked the ukrainian crisis when they supported the coup d’etat in ukraine in 1914, they we couldn’t help but understand that this was a red line, we said this a thousand times, no, we went ahead, well, we got today’s situation, and i suspect that it’s no coincidence, they needed this conflict, a result, a part that had been wasting a long time, well, not completely, but a significant part of its sovereignty, europe was forced to immediately follow its sovereign and follow his policy, move to

a policy of sanctions and restrictions in relations with russia, it was forced, realizing that this was to its detriment, and now all energy resources, a significant part of these energy resources, are bought from the united states, 30% more expensive, which means they imposed restrictions on russian oil, but what is the result? this is not as obvious as for gas, but the result is the same, they reduced the number of suppliers, and we , in turn, began to buy from a reduced number of oil suppliers at more expensive prices, and we sell our oil to other countries at a discount , you know what happened,

the competitiveness of the european economy fell down, and the competitiveness of their main thing, in fact, from an economic point of view, is... and other countries , including in asia, has also increased, with your own hands. as a result of the loss, the loss of part of their sovereignty with their own hands , they were forced to make decisions to their detriment, but why do we need such a partner, of course, he is not useless, but i want to draw your attention to the fact that we are largely leaving the fading european market, we are increasing our presence in growing markets in other regions of the world, including asia.

at the same time, of course, we are connected with europe by numerous, centuries-old ties in the field of culture, education, i repeat, all this is based on christian culture, but even here the europeans are not very good at us. they destroy their roots based on christian culture, they simply tear them out mercilessly, therefore, we are not going to close anything, neither windows nor doors, but we are not going to break into europe if europe doesn’t want it, does it want it? please, we will work together, please, but - well, it seems

to me, yes, well, we can talk endlessly, but in my opinion i noted the main points, now regarding the textbook and the color revolutions of 1956, i won’t hide it, i’m in i didn’t read this part of the textbook, but regarding the withdrawal of troops, of course, these are also historical facts, then in 1956 many western countries fueled the problems that were taking place, including this was due to the mistakes of the then hungarian leadership, trained and trained militants abroad , transferred them to hungary, but this, in my opinion, is still - still to be called in its purest form some kind of... color revolution is difficult, because after all, of course

, there was an internal basis for a serious, as it were, protest within the country itself, this, in my opinion, is an obvious thing, as far as it goes, but then it’s unlikely that today’s, today’s formulations are needed to be transferred to the middle of the last century, and as for the withdrawal of troops, i am deeply convinced that there is no point in suppressing, with the help of troops, internal tendencies in a particular country, among the people, to achieve those goals that they consider priority for themselves. this applies to european countries, including eastern european ones, but there was no point. keep troops there, if , uh, if, uh, if the people of these countries did not want

to see them on their territory, but how this happened, on what conditions all this what happened, how, this of course raises many questions, but our troops went straight into an open field, many, how many people know about this, just into an open field. with families, is this normal? at the same time, any obligations, any kind, any legal, legal consequences of the withdrawal of these troops were also not formulated, not by the soviet or russian leadership, the western partners did not undertake any obligations at all, but at least returned to the issue of expansion and yes, everything was promised, well, our american partners did not

they deny this verbally, and then we keep asking: where is the piece of paper, there is no piece of paper , that’s it, and goodbye, they promised, well, it seems like they promised, but it’s worth nothing, we know that the piece of paper is worth nothing to them , they are ready to choose any piece of paper, but at least they recorded something on paper, and during the withdrawal of troops it could be agreed upon. to agree on issues of ensuring security in europe, to achieve some kind of new structure in europe, so... mr. bahr, egon bahr, had proposals, i already spoke about this once, to create a new security system in europe, which would include russia, and the same united states, and the same canada, but not nato, but together with everyone, for eastern and central europe, in my opinion, this would

solve many of the problems of today , and then he said, the grandfather was smart, he said, he says: otherwise you will see, everything will be the same, only closer to russia, the german politician, an experienced, competent and intelligent person , no one listened to him, not even the soviet leadership, and even more so in the west and in the united states, well, now we have what he, what he said, you know, and therefore the withdrawal of troops, yes, it was pointless to hold, but the conditions for the withdrawal, this was exactly what we had to talk about and achieve the creation of a situation that would perhaps not lead to today’s tragedies and the current crisis, well, that’s probably all, yes, i answered your questions, if i forgot something, please, thank you, since

we started talking about germany stefan hudd, right there in the center. so maybe it turns out that we are maintaining contacts at a high level, we are maintaining contact between and even german parties are in contact, we also have parties that are deeply russian in essence and of course, they have no sympathy for the russian people, they

do not understand at all that russia is a multinational country. as already mentioned in your speech, and this is what i would like to understand: what do you expect, what does your government count on, from contacts with the parliaments of other countries, with other parties, with parties that have a similar sense, almost fascist, do you understand that anti-fascism in europe is also not supports your policy, the european anti -fascist movement does not support russian actions, excuse me, please, i would like to ask you, i would like to ask you... what do you mean when you say pro-fascist forces and pro-fascist parties about their attitude towards russia and so on , please be direct and specific, otherwise we will speak half-heartedly, or better yet directly. so, the head of tinok huvder, held an official meeting with the minister of foreign affairs, delgay lavrov, in

2020, and it was an official meeting, and part of the afd are essentially based on the fascist movement, and anti-fascists in germany do not quite understand the meaning of such contacts and do not understand the meaning of russia’s policy in relation to what , excuse me, please, what do you see, what do you see, that’s what is confirmed what you said is that they are based in their activities on some... fascist, pro-fascist, national socialist ideas, can you tell me specifically what they are talking about? for example, he is directly connected with the fascists, he regularly goes to demonstrations in dreston, in

anniversary of the events, and he comes out with the fascists, this is a representative of the alternative for germany party directly connected with the nazi-fascist movement, they often say there, he does not hide that this is a right-wing party, it’s clear, that means, look, you started with ukraine, you asked me, rightly so or the fact that we publicly declare that we are striving for denazification of the ukrainian political system, well, we were just discussing the situation that developed in the canadian parliament, when the president of ukraine stood and applauded the murderer of jews and russians poles, isn’t this a sign that a system has developed in ukraine that we have the right to call pro-nazi. the leader of the state stands and applauds a nazi and not just some ideological follower of nazism, but a real nazi, a former sss soldier, is

n’t this a sign of the nazification of ukraine, and doesn’t this give us the right to talk about its denazification, but you can answer, yes, this is the head of state, but this is not the whole country, and i’ll tell you: you said about those who go to rallies together with pro-fascist elements, is this really the whole party that comes to these rallies? probably not, we certainly condemn everything that is pro-fascist, pro-nazi, everything that is devoid of these, well, these signs. on the contrary , we maintain contact aimed at establishing some kind of contact. as far as i know, an attempt was made on one of the leaders

of the alternative for germany, the federal republic, but only now during the election campaign, what does this mean? that representatives of this party use nazi methods. or these nazi methods are used against them, because this is an issue awaiting its painstaking attention, including in your person , in the person of the general public of the federal republic itself, but as for the anti-fascist forces, we have always been with them , we know their position regarding russia, we are grateful for this position, and we certainly support it, i think that this... everything that is aimed at reviving, at maintaining, at relations between us must be supported, and this, of course, can be

the light in the end tunnel of our today relationships. i go into the shower, a shell flies into the office, you and rudskoy made some mistakes in you, naturally, you made what you would have done differently, we could have won, those who went against a peaceful city and unleashed a bloodbath are criminals, then such the option chosen was not parliamentary, not popular, but tough; shooting from tanks was not a spectacle... it was from here that the same broadcast was conducted, which was watched by the whole world.

the fact is that each side believed that the instigator was the other side. i'm in those days i fulfilled my oath, even after 30 years, i believe that i do not know the whole truth about the events of the ninety-third year. russia is going through the most difficult time in post-soviet history. a crisis that will end in bloodshed. we'll take on this matter. this will be an honest detective.

alexey grevach, back there, uh, thank you for the opportunity to ask a question, it is also of a research nature, we are working on the latest events in the gas sector. exactly a year ago, well, a little more, we all witnessed an incredible act

an unprecedented act of international terrorism against critical cross-border european infrastructure, i mean the explosions of northern streams, and you have commented a lot on this topic, including the monumental negligence of european investigators and politicians in assessing this situation, we can say brilliant, we see brilliant absence. any clear reaction of condemnation of this fact on the part of the leadership, for example, chancellor scholdz or president macron, although the companies of these countries can be said to have directly suffered from these actions, since they were and are shareholders, co-owners of these assets and co-investors of these projects, but at the same time, numerous ones have appeared recently.

plums who directly or indirectly try to assign blame, and supposedly the investigation comes to such conclusions that ukrainian comrades are behind these acts, in this regard , i have two questions for you, first, was there any reaction from the outside ? data, gentlemen , political figures of your european counterparts, in some direct contacts, in official speeches, which were not, in my opinion look, or what is called through diplomatic channels, the second question is, what can and will be the consequences if the so-called european investigation, the investigative authorities of european countries still place the blame for these events, actions on the ukrainian side, which

i wanted i would like to point out that long before these explosions, the president of the united states publicly said that the united states would do everything to ensure that russian energy supplies to europe through these pipeline systems were stopped, moreover, he smiled so meaningfully and said: “now i won’t say how it will be done, but we will do it.” first, second, the destruction of these infrastructure facilities is certainly an act of international terrorism. third, we are not allowed to participate in the investigation, despite our proposals and repeated calls to do so. further, there are no results of investigations, and , apparently, there will not be any. and finally, in answering

the question of who is to blame, you always need to answer the question, who is interested in this? interested, of course, american supplier of energy resources to the european market, the americans have wanted this for a long time, they have achieved it, and by whose hands, it no longer matters, but it is. of course, if it is ever revealed who did this, it must be brought to justice , this is an act of international terrorism, but one, one branch of nord stream 2 remains, it is not damaged, it can supply 27.5 billion cubic meters of gas to europe .

this is only the decision of the government of the federal republic of germany, nothing more is needed, here is the decision today, tomorrow we turn everything on, and the gas flows, but they don’t do this, because, as we say, the washington regional committee does not allow, to the detriment of its own interests, gas to be supplied to europe, but through turkish flows and judging by all ukrainian terrorist groups are aimed at causing damage to him too, there our ships are guarding these pipeline systems laid along the bottom of the black sea, but they are constantly trying to attack them with the help of drones, and which -