[000:00:00;00] world economy, the same thing is happening in india, there is even more growth, 7.6% there, in my opinion, therefore, these are the countries of the global south, they are gaining momentum, our task is to ensure this leadership, this is the first, second in the field of security , we see what is happening in europe, we see that one of the ways to provoke and create a crisis... in ukraine was the irrepressible desire of western countries, primarily the united states, to expand nato to the borders of the russian federation, but they are doing the same thing on east, creating various closed military groups, they are stepping on the same rake that they were attacking in europe, so it is important for us to respond to this in a timely manner, we

will expand our... there is in the security sector, while we are not creating any blocs against anyone, but we are forced to react to what is happening around our states, and finally, we will certainly implement those plans for infrastructural development that are related to the construction of greater eurasia, the eurasian economic union and the plans of our chinese friends for development... the idea was one train, one track, i have already spoken about this, i think that this is very promising, but finally, we have a lot of cooperation planned in the humanitarian spheres, in the field of culture, student exchanges, sports, this is extremely important for

neighboring states, and we are implementing quite large infrastructure projects already in a bilateral plan and will continue to do so, i hope we will discuss all this in the near future, during our meeting with chairman sinepin, within the framework of the forum that the chairman is holding in beijing, in october of this year, so mikhail rostovsky there, vladimirovich, ukraine’s entry into nato is categorical for russia. unacceptable, but as far as i remember your last speech , regarding ukraine’s accession to the european union, you were much less negative, has your point of view changed over the past year, will russia object to ukraine’s accession to the european union, do you think is such an entry possible in principle? we never

objected and... showed some kind of negative position regarding plans for ukraine to join the european economic community, never, as for nato, yes, we have always been against it, and this position has certain serious grounds, since the expansion of nato to our borders directly threatens our security, this is the most serious challenge for security of the russian federation, this is not only a political bloc, it is a military-political bloc, and the approach of infrastructure poses a serious threat to us, and as for the economic interaction of any countries, economic unions, we do not see any military threat to ourselves, therefore we do not consider ourselves to have the right to even discuss this topic,

this is a matter for ukraine itself and european states, at one time president yanukovych, by the way, did not, without renouncing the association with the european union , said that we just need to further study these issues, because he believes that the terms of the agreement on the creation of this association with the european union pose certain serious threats to the ukrainian economy, in fact, if you read it. what was written there, he was i’m absolutely right, there is the opening of borders, the creation of absolutely unacceptable conditions for the functioning of the ukrainian economy, the ukrainian real sector of the economy, well , these are more competitive european goods, the opening of the ukrainian market for these goods was extremely destructive for the real sector of the economy of

ukraine itself, being drawn into the energy sector. .. the structure of the european union also deprived ukraine of certain advantages, so if you just analyze it objectively, but he was right yanukovych. they used this as a reason for a coup d’etat, well, some kind of nonsense, i just don’t know, just a reason, i don’t know, a crime, a real one, but today it’s no longer relevant, because by and large, the ukrainian economy is without external support cannot exist either, today everything is different, today look, everything is balanced there as a whole, externally and the budget is balanced... macroeconomic indicators are more or less torn out, well, at the expense of what? due to monthly multi-billion dollar outflows, about 4-5 billions monthly through various channels, these are loans, all sorts of grants and

so on, goes to ukraine , as soon as this is stopped, that’s it, in a week everything will fall, that’s it, the same goes for the defense system, just imagine, supplies will stop tomorrow? you'll only have a week to live when the ammunition runs out, but they're going to waste , i already said, the usa produces 14,000 155-caliber shells, and ukrainian troops burn up to 5,000 a day, and they produce 14 a month, well, you know what we're talking about, but they're trying increase production there up to 75 by the end of next year, but we still have to live until the end of next year, in europe the situation is approximately the same, they themselves say, they said that we supplied everything, all the armored vehicles, ammunition, we did everything for ukraine, they themselves said

, it wasn’t me who came up with this, they stated publicly, we did everything for this, now it’s up to ukraine, let them counter-offensive, and then anyone will add in the kulaars. at a cost, believe me, i know what i’m talking about, so they do it, they try to do it at any cost, that’s it, but it’s worth it, this is a question of demilitarization ukraine, it is now trying to produce something else, but little is working, even these unmanned vehicles and aircraft that move across the sea, everything happens with the help of western advisers and intermediaries. the european union is ready to accept such an economy into its membership, flag in hand forward, but in order to maintain the vitality of the population, which has already

decreased from 31 or from the beginning of the post-soviet period from 41 million to 19 and a half, and maybe even more no, but still 19 million need to be fed. this it’s not an easy matter, european countries are ready to take such an economy, well, let them take it, we have never been against it, and before the aggravation of this crisis we are not against it now, but i have already said what is happening in the european economy itself, well, this it would be very noble. on their part, take also the economy of ukraine in its current state, there are also certain funds, certain procedures for equalizing, equalizing the level of economic development,

well, i don’t even know how long it is now, colleague from hungary spoke about how much hungary is now receiving from these funds, but it will not receive anything, of course, because everything will go to ukraine, and it won’t be enough. nothing, no one will receive anything, no one, that means, if the level, level, well-being has decreased by one and a half over the last couple of years there, then it will not only fall to zero, it will go into minus, however, i do not want to be ironic, i don’t want to force anything, it’s just that these are the realities, but if this happens, we don’t consider ourselves to have the right to somehow counteract it and even speak negatively about this. vladim vladimirovich, is there really a line left between nato and the eu, these are the same

countries? well, i think that after all, the eu is not a military bloc, and why transfer all this to the eu platform if there is nato, as you said, they are alone. parties, they make appropriate decisions within the framework of this organization. nato, in fact , is primarily an instrument of us foreign policy, so they provoked the conflict. before the acute phase in ukraine, united their allies and satellites around themselves, in fact, they demanded that they take measures in the fight against russia, they took these measures, the united states immediately took advantage of this situation in the economic sphere, imposed its own, expensive energy resources, and made a decision related to increasing

the attractiveness of its economy and its markets , and why, this is a fact, many industrial enterprises in europe and germany decide to move to the usa, this is the end result of this entire chain, well, if i know, i’m sure, many people don’t like it. in the same europe, they still see it they understand, but they can’t do anything, and today’s european elites, apparently, are not ready to fight for their interests, they simply cannot, they are not ready, the dependence is very large in the economic sphere, partly they can even understand this, well, that’s why i’m sure everything will gradually level out, and those same states, in my opinion, are making a colossal

strategic mistake. of various kinds, so they put pressure on their allies, and then questions arise like from a colleague from germany, here the afd is raising the city, an alternative for germany, of course they will raise it, because no one from the ruling class is fighting for the interests of germany, that’s why this is happening, is it not clear to you or something, this is an obvious thing, so mm, well, let’s see how this situation will develop, they want, the ukrainians want to join the eu, let them join, the europeans are ready to accept them, let them accept , the day before yesterday there was just... german unity, i read in some newspaper that

there was a big problem there, gerhard schröder came to the event, and all active politicians were solving the problem of how not to end up next to him because he is your friend. you still have friends in germany, by the way, you know, the point is not whether i still have friends in germany, although i have friends there, and their number is growing, strange as it may seem, at the expense of those whom he is talking about ? no, it doesn’t matter, but primarily at the expense of those who pursue the interests of their own people and do not want to serve the interests of others. as for schröder, germany should be proud of people like him, he is a true son of his people, he thinks of the interests of the german people above all. i assure you, with every decision and always, it is first of all in the corner, when discussing... any issue that we discussed with her

was the interests of the german economy and the german state, but what is happening today? it was we who built nord stream 1 and almost nord stream 2 , we started doing it with him, we blew up these infrastructure systems, and where is the german economy now, where is it, so these are the ones who are trying to get rid of it stay away would you think about what he did for the interests of his people and what they are doing today, and what is the result? so, rakhim, yes, shakbaev, yeah, and good evening, here on kulday, excuse me, what surprises me, i’ll tell you honestly, it surprises me that such people, such politicians still exist in europe, that they have survived at all,

this is surprising, i’m telling you this sincerely, because the generation of people who are able to defend national interests, in my opinion, simply self-liquidated it, disappeared somewhere, good evening, here at the club valdai there were a lot of discussions, and which stated the imperfection and injustice of the structure of the world monetary economic system, world finance, the world economy, and many experts pinned great hopes on brix plus, but could you share your vision of the desired, most importantly, possible structure of the world monetary system -economic system and what discussions are going on about the single currency, thank you, well, as for the global financial system, it is of course not ideal, balanced and

responding to the interests of the overwhelming majority of participants in international communication, well, look, i already spoke about this, i will repeat it again, at the russia-africa summit... colleagues said that our african friends mentioned that the credit burden african states have over a trillion dollars, so that it is impossible to pay off these debts , it will simply never be done, so what is this, what kind of system of international financial relations is this? same some kind of indemnity, these are not loans, these are already beyond the scope of normal economic financial relations, the modern financial system, it gave birth to such a state, brought it to this state, so i then jokingly,

jokingly said that only cowards pay debts, but this, but he warned that this is a joke, here, but, but this is not normal when such a situation is created, and of course, something needs to be changed, this bartanwood system, it, it was once created on the basis of the dollar and so on, but but all this is gradual is collapsing, collapsing, because a currency is a derivative of uh power ... the economy of a country that imitates this currency, the share, the share of the american economy in world gdp remains the same, this is also an obvious thing, these are statistical data, the share of the brix countries, i

mean that too he said that it is based on purchasing power parity, in relation to the share of the seven countries. increases increases, especially after the admission of new members to the organization, this is a serious significance, the difference is already quite serious, yes, the economy of the united states, the eurozone, it is based on with modern technologies, this means that income per capita is much higher than in developing economies, but what is the trend, everything goes into the negative there during a recession. in