energy that charges and gives inspiration for new, new achievements and exploits.

well then, let’s not end here, margarita simonyan maybe yes margarit please, although you could give the floor to foreigners anyway, please, well, okay, you said about karabakh, i, as an ethnic armenian, cannot help but react, let me assure you, that all normal armenians understand everything perfectly and understand perfectly well that pashinyan was brought to power in the first place. the time is right to surrender karabakh and in order to raise such questions as our presenter quoted from european politicians, and normal armenians understand that if not for russia, the armenian people would not exist, as at the beginning of the 19th century, when griboyedov saved them, and at the beginning of 21, when peacekeepers were saved in karabakh, this is a remark , a short question, our guest from hungary does not want to ask about our odessa, but i want to, because odessa is a russian city, a beautiful city, it seems to us that russian cities should. in

russia this question is where would you like us to stay? thank you, the first part of your speech, i cannot agree with you that it means that prime minister pashenyan was brought to power by someone from the outside and in order to surrender karabakh, after all, it was the choice of the armenian people. yes, you can have different attitudes towards the electoral processes, but this is a fact, so i don’t agree with you here, this is the first and second thing that he sought to create karabakh, i also don’t agree, i communicated with him, communicated closely, during this period conflict of the twentieth year, and a little earlier, of course, because let's remember when it came to authorities, he said

that karabakh is part of armenia, no one had ever said this before, well, the truth is, then his position changed radically, that’s why, this is no longer a question for me, but later in the course of the conflict of the twentieth year, i talked to him, in my opinion, he sincerely strived to maintain the situation, to preserve it, i ’m not saying now whether decisions were right or wrong, it’s up to her to judge that, but to say that he’s saying that he purposefully surrendered karabakh, i think it’s unfair, now about, about, where should we stay, you know, we, it’s not a matter of territories, it’s a matter of guaranteeing the safety of the people.

russia and the russian state, and this is a more complex issue than some territory, in the safety of people who consider russia their homeland, and we consider them our people, well, this is such a complex issue that requires conversation, i ’m afraid to talk to your husband , he is like that, which means, if not an extremist, a person of extremes...

asking the west and the imposition of deliberate construct of civilization that you said who are you to ask who are they to ask us or anyone in that matter? against their own consumers, that’s my question: is it possible during crises to see an opportunity for russia, the possibility

of creating a new economic world of order, i’m a political scientist, and it seems to me that it’s all about the economic order, the one who controls natural resources is , who controls all routes , transportation, has all the levers of control, and is there any new project, how can we resist sanctions, sanctions are really strangling not only russia, but also many others countries, russia survives because russia has many resources, but there are others. for example, in africa in asia, and we are facing serious challenges, and can you formulate your own opinion, how would you determine whether it is possible in the future to form a new economic world order led by russia,

i fully agree with what you just said , this is so, the future world order will certainly be based on the future economic and monetary and financial system, it must be more balanced, it must meet interests of the overwhelming majority of participants in international communication, this is the case, are there any prospects that this will eventually take place, this is a very complex process, judging by the way our opponents behave, let ’s call them that, since we are now talking about economics , we won’t use any other terms, but they cling at all costs to their religions, as i already said, and many people think so, that the britannian system is outdated, because it’s not me who is saying this, these are experts, western experts, it needs to be changed, of course ,

it leads to such an ugly phenomenon as, say, debt obligations of developing economies, of course, this is certainly, of course, complete dominion... of the dollar in the world system, it will be, it’s already a matter of time, but with its own, uh, let’s say, well to put it mildly, not by professional actions, uh, by his stubbornness and - by his disdain for all other participants in international economic communication. let's say, the political and financial authorities, the economic authorities of the united states, shoot themselves in the foot, because when they restrict, they are limited, payments are made in dollars , but what should we do? we are then forced, we are simply

forced to pay in national currencies, we are forced to discuss the issues that i already spoke about when answering one of my colleagues’ questions. create new logistics of these currency transactions, thus, the scope of the dollar is naturally reduced, it is reduced as the united states, it is a huge economy, and the country is huge and great, without any doubt, if there can be no doubt, we are nothing here we don't downplay anything we exaggerate, but it itself is reducing... developing economies. at what rate is asia developing? this is what happens. and the states, based on the political situation

of today, are accelerating these processes. well, excuse me, but, to put it mildly, you know, there is such a common expression. this is worse than a crime, this is a mistake, this is so, in this case it is so, so if there are any projects that will be created. uh, there is a new economic, logistical base, of course, here - chairman xinzenpeng proposes one of such projects, one train, one track, this is a unifying slogan, one train and one track, all together, and we are doing the same thing - during the construction of the eurasian economic community, we are thinking together about how to unite, and if they still join here brix countries, sco countries, well, listen, this is joint work and pakistan is also taking part in this,

working together to find a solution, of course, this is a complex, complex task, it will take time, but the realization that this will benefit everyone push this process forward, i’ll end where i started; in this sense, the strengthening of a multipolar world is inevitable. thank you very much. thank you very much, thank you very much, vladimir vladimirovich, we are waiting for you in a year at the twenty-first in aldai , and i, everyone, too, am waiting for you at events of this kind, and i want to thank you for your participation, thank you very much, beautifully decorated platforms, half-naked women in feathers walking along

the sambodrome, a russian will not behave like that, a brazilian still doesn’t know how to show the world our culture, my acquaintance with brazil is naturally, the slave series. slaves of nesaura was my first television role and i became very famous not only in brazil but in the world. this is favella, i grew up in a favela, it is an integral part of my life, i agree with those who say that brazil is green russia, and russia is northern brazil. vladimir putin today took part in

the final plenary session of the twentieth annual meeting of the international valdai club. the main theme of a fair multipolar one is how to ensure security and development for everyone. the president answered most topical issue and spoke about his vision of the future world order, about the values ​​for which we are fighting, about relations with our current and former partners, as well as about the threats facing modern ones. russian nuclear doctrine, let me remind you that in the russian military doctrine, there are two , two, two reasons for the possible use of nuclear weapons by russia, the first is the use against us, that is, in response to a counter strike, the so-called, in practice , what does this mean, the missiles have launched, our spr system has detected, ah,

recorded, made it known that the target is the territory of the russian federation, all this happens in seconds, so that everyone understands, and already understanding, knowing the information that a blow is being struck against russia, we, for our part... respond to this aggression , and i want to assure everyone that today, the answer is absolutely unacceptable for any potential aggressor, because from the moment the missile launch is detected, no matter where it comes from, from anywhere in the world’s oceans or from any territory, in response to an oncoming strike, so many, so many hundreds, hundreds of our missiles appear

in the air that not a single enemy has a chance of survival, and in several directions at once, the second, the second reason for the use of these weapons is a threat to the existence of the russian state, if even conventional weapons are used against russia, but under threat. the very existence of russia as a state is being questioned, here are two possible reasons for the use of weapons that you... said, do we need to change this, and why, everything can be changed, but i just don’t see the need, in this, well, there is no such situation in which, well, let’s say, today something would threaten russian statehood and the existence of the russian state, no,

that means, i think, what kind of person of sound mind and clarity it would never occur to me to use nuclear weapons against russia , but nevertheless, the point of view is yours, other experts, people who are patriotic, very worried about what is happening inside the country, around us, worried about what is happening here on the line of combat contact, in the ukrainian direction, i understand everything, we look carefully and, believe me, respect your point of view, but i don’t see such a need to change our concept there, the potential enemy knows about everything , knows about our capabilities, here’s another thing, well, for example, i’m already hearing calls, for example, to start testing nuclear

weapons, to return to testing, here’s what i would say: the united states has signed the corresponding international act, document a treaty banning nuclear weapons tests, and russia signed it, russia signed and ratified it, and the united states signed but did not ratify, well , now we have almost completed work on modern types of strategic weapons that i spoke about and which i announced earlier several years ago, the last successful test of the burevestnik, a global-range, nuclear- powered, nuclear-propelled cruise missile, was carried out.

we have actually finished work on the format, over the missile, the question is that we just need to finish some procedures purely, administratively and bureaucratically, move on to their mass production of putting them on combat duty, and we will do this in the near future, that’s how the rules are, experts say, well, new weapon, you need to make sure that there is a boy-charge, a special boyzar will work without failures , but we need to carry out tests, well , i’m not ready to say right now whether we really or not need to carry out tests, but but uh, well, behave in a mirror way in relations with

i will repeat once again by the united states, when they signed, but did not ratify, and we ... in principle , it is possible to behave in a mirror manner with the same united states, but this is a question for the state duma deputies, theoretically it is possible to revoke this ratification, it is enough if we and this let’s do it, this will be quite enough, well, karaganov is happy, i’ll say it straight, and i’m happy, because if

, well, i hope, the duma will hear the supreme commander, then the agreement has not entered into force, it cannot, but we will ratify it, so what? therefore, we must comply, we, unlike you, honor our laws, so first the duma must recall, yes, that’s what needs to be done - everyone, including political figures, and some business players, learn from the supreme... commander, this is to say softly, but after that speak so softly that after that no one has any doubts that they will act harshly, so... of course, this is a really balanced speech, that for now we will not lower the nuclear threshold, but here there are both

burevestnik and sarmat, and of course i don’t i can speak for the deputies of the state duma, of course, they are all absolutely , so to speak, free in their decisions, but if i were them, i would listen to what vladimirovich putin said, because it will be very timely, because yes. if we proceed from such a legal , well, what is called a completely purist position, that since the americans have not ratified the nuclear test ban treaty, nevertheless, the very fact of ratification on our part imposes quite serious restrictions on our position, now we don’t seem to be lowering it. nuclear weapons, but we are removing certain restrictions from ourselves, restrictions are being lifted, now really, whether to test it or not

, here, of course, the relevant experts must decide , i won’t even get into that here, although it would seem to me that these are still new warheads for new missiles, they must be made somehow, but again, let the experts decide, but the most important thing, i think, was not only... about this, the most important thing in the president’s speech, it was about the fact that the coming multipolar world, some people call it polycentric, because in general no one aspires to be a full-fledged global pole of power, this is such political science scholasticism, but the coming multipolar world, firstly, will not build itself, no, that is, it will arise in any case, but how will it arise... will it arise through war, through armed confrontation, through a global or sub-global catastrophe, or will we and

the responsible forces in the world be able to use those remaining chances to build it, well what is called on a constructive basis, but i also have my own point of view, but again the last chances of building a multipolar world in some kind of dialogue mode cannot be taken away either. secondly, it will not build itself, it must meet the interests of a multipolar world, it must meet the interests of truly sovereign countries , countries that can enjoy sovereignty, and this means a multipolar world - this is, first of all, responsibility, and not irresponsibility, when political scoundrels on a regional scale , maximum whom, this is what is called confidacy in front of the train station in armavir, i am not hinting at anyone now, yes, they decide that they are politicians on a global scale, this

should not happen in a multipolar world, because politicians who are interested in confidacy, how would they confidacy , how would they do this in armavir , in shepetovka and somewhere else, these are people at a turning point... systems of international relations capable of bringing all this to disaster and one more very important thing, you know, i noticed, here we have a lot has been said, by the way i read these comments that were made when the president spoke, that he buried europe as a serious geopolitical, what to curtain the window back and forth, but i don’t agree with you, i believe that the president gave europe some more chance, he’s there he said that there are politicians there, there are people there who take a responsible approach to this issue, to the question of the future of this very europe, but if europe decides

to commit continental suicide, we really can’t do anything, yes, but the question here is: what europe should to realize itself as an independent economic force, to the extent that europe is able to do this, this is big. well, it should be noted that putin spoke from the position of european interests, unlike european politicians who forgot about their own interests when they were laying out the economy and the stupidity that europe is doing, de facto destroying itself economically, this is generally a fantastic thing, when for the interests of a sovereign europe, as one of the key players in the new multipolar world, is the president of the russian federation, and politicians who...

to dissolve your national sovereignty in this faceless europeanness, well, we understand that faceless europeanness is , as they say, such external control by the united states, because there will be no other, yes, but one more such very last thing that i still have to understand that the president said it very clearly, that is, he didn’t say it directly, but as usual... he speaks softly, the sediment is always like this, very often western leaders miss this sediment, so as you remember, then everyone let it pass by, you realized what you had done, no, they didn’t understand, now it’s about a phrase of the same scale, the same depth, and if you don’t stop the degradation of the normal system of the world economy, there will be a global economic one.

it is still possible to stop it, it is possible to transfer the formation from the economic base of a multipolar world to an evolutionary mode , otherwise all this will happen in a revolutionary way, through the collapse of the existing system, they will hear, no, they will not hear, in my opinion, in my opinion, they proceed too much from the fact that what are they all-important from an economic point of view, although everything is already cracking, but i don’t see it, in the western countries everything is cracking, their house is collapsing, their rafters are cracking, beams are cracking, already in europe they have started what is called beams- then fall out, because slovakia is a small beam, yes, but it fell and from one small beam, one small prop, a lot depends, because slovakia is a precedent, and a precedent that began to be implemented very quickly, yes, this means , people have accumulated,

just yet in fact... the government was not formed, and aid to ukraine was frozen, which means that it was already suffered , so here the question is, what if in europe, and indeed in the western world in general, there are forces that are ready to take responsibility for the rehabilitation of american-centric, absolutely parasitic financial capital who survives, this is, well, we discussed this, finally, this is at the political level. the phrase was uttered: a military-financial pyramid, but this also means that the life of this pyramid has come to an end, are there these forces in the west, this is actually a call, the call to board the last car of multipolarity, which the president voiced, it will be interesting to wait, what will be the answer to this, will there be someone

who will have the courage, full of people traveling in first class, absolutely true, but these it’s not clear how they were allowed into first grade. of course, i think canada should stay awake today, but first they will try to do everything so as not to hear what putin said, and when it breaks through the internet anyway, well, i think, oh, canadians should be difficult, they will think how answer, still choose who the canadian speaker is, an idiot, yes, or a fool, or

a scoundrel, or a scoundrel.