or a fool, a scoundrel, or a scoundrel,

well, of course, putin has decomposed. in the poem base superstructure boris abramovich lutsky, poet, front-line soldier, spoke about what he read from engels and found out from marx, what the various masses were angry about, we also read, and antiduring and the eighteenth brumira of louis benoparte, and not only read bogdanov and plekhanov and lenin, we read from vladimiravich that the most important thing for

a leader, the most important thing in a leader, is the ability to see further than others, to have a clear strategy and to be responsible for your decisions. probably in the modern world, this kind of leaders, who can see further than others, have a clear strategy and are responsible for their decisions, can be placed on the fingers of one hand, but because, well, modern... european politicians, i’m not even talking about post-soviet politicians, these are some kind of political scams, for whom sometimes it is better to sell tomatoes at the market, because they consider the lives of their citizens, in this capacity, they trade these lives, but a leader who can so confidently, calmly,

respond competently for almost 4 hours to keep the audience in suspense, not only the one present in the hall, and you correctly said, on the other side of the ocean, and this tension will not subside for a long time, there is only one such leader, there is such a leader russia has this quality to see further than others, it didn’t manifest itself today, not in valdai, yes, it manifested itself. probably on such a public global scale, it was during the munich speech, mira gennadich already recalled, 2007, but then, they immediately shushed and shouted, yes you don’t understand us there, and so on and by the way, this is a quality that allows you to really talk very calmly, softly, turning to jokes, so to speak, forming such a human background, a conversation, about very serious and important things, freely,

i repeat, it, it creates in western leaders, in journalists close to these politicians, a feeling of complete not not this is not uh... so let’s say, not just incompetence, but simply a complete failure to meet such standards, this even results in personal hostility and hatred, because they they understand that they can never reach such a level, simply never, that’s what concerns the international agenda , indeed, as the president stated in his speech, and then returned to this, answering questions, 20 years in history, on the one hand, is small the deadline, yes, but on the other hand, it has been passed: after all, absolutely gigantic milestones, and the world is in a twenty-year period, because today is the anniversary meeting of the valdai club, formally it took place in september 2004, it’s just that 20 meetings have already passed, this is exactly the anniversary, so

over the course of these 20 meetings , colossal changes have taken place, and indeed, if we look at the number of people who arrived at the first meeting. then in the number of seats present in the first rows were the united states of america, great britain, continental europe was represented first of all, today this is not our choice, but the choice of the collective west, they are in the minority represented on the site, although they also exist, but now it brought together representatives of more than forty states from of all inhabited continents, but it is not the change that is important. and changes in the agenda itself, because in the 2000s, our country itself was oriented rather towards the global west, because it seemed to us, and the president also spoke about this, that we were joining a single team, yes, we were not

going to be applicants from westernization, so that we could be taught how to live , because we ourselves are a european civilization, we have a huge, colossal... experience of european civilization, but they didn’t want to listen to us, not that we were doing something wrong they said, european civilization, but they couldn’t convey it, but what they mean is that we are included in european culture, this is just a very important point, in european culture, but not in civilization, because putin, when he answered this, he said, that we have common christian values, but at our core, we are fundamentally, yes, we are much more than european civilization, yes, this is true, that is, objective si. culture, but they didn’t want us, let alone hear us, they wanted to accept us at the level of, so to speak, well, just some applicants from them there, yes,

civilizational attitudes, it turns out that mm, well, it seems like we wanted to, but it didn’t work out, not through our fault, and it was absolutely rightly said that, in general, this global war that the west is now waging against russia is not us started, and we are finishing it, what kind of world awaits us? and this was also said, by the way, only a great power, only russia, can declare such a goal to set such a task as our goal is to change the world, yes, to make it different, no one is capable of such a task, and accordingly, the old world, it existed, why didn’t anyone take on such a task, putin didn’t say that, that’s just me. no, that is, china can do it, and india can do it, moreover, the message from vladimir vladimich is precisely that we respect all civilizations, we are not trying, we are not trying, to replace this cocky nose

of the anglo-saxons , we are not trying to say, no, now we are in your place, we generally offer a different system of values, this is exactly what putin was talking about. before i began to answer the question, just about this, that is, this system-forming, this is a value-based speech in the development of those speeches that have been going on for the past few years, that is , the very ideology that we were talking about is being formed, that’s right, a change, but here ’s a change in the world in what key from hierarchy to many, many the word, it seems to me, is key, polycentric, as we will say, multilateral, multipolar, and so on. where there is a place for every culture, that ’s absolutely correct, where there is a place for every, mm, every country, every people, and this fundamentally is precisely the difference from the world that was built after the victory, which the west attributed to itself in

the cold war, because in reality this is also a controversial issue, of course, what is the controversial issue, well, because no one really didn't resist, right? you know, it’s like saying now, they lost karabakh, well, yes, they didn’t resist, they surrendered, today even more, but in fact, of course, gorbachev lost the war, yes, we talked many times... there are different assessments, yes this betrayal, but if look at the fact, we lost territory, we became the most divided people on earth, yes, the enemy did not come to our capital, did not raise his flag and did not hold a parade, but they paid the toll, but, excuse me, the man who became the leader of our country , then i went to kiss persen for the label, the princess must, god, classify america and russia too, this is, this is a shame from which to wash off

and wash off, gorbachev gave up, and we lost, well, well, that’s what i meant, so , it turns out that the world that arose is here after this tragedy, the destruction of the union, it was very hierarchical, yes , western-centric and so on, and now we live in an era of transformation, it seems to me that the hierarchy... is already coming to an end, this path is very difficult, bloody, cruel, but any transformation, it’s not smoothing a paved road, but the main thing is that the prospect of a world without hierarchy, this is the versatility that is talked about more than once today, but is it possible to say a world without hierarchy, a world without hierarchy fundamentally cannot exist, here's another question, that civilization is put at the forefront, because well, involuntarily , there are always hierarchies in some form, but

there is no escape from this, but the question is whether the country feels like a civilization or not, or whether it gives away a significant part he doesn’t feel his own powers, sovereignty, this is a vivid example, in what language does vladimirovich putin speak? in russian? yes, what languages ​​do the leaders of the european union speak, in english? yes. in a language that is foreign to them, and they speak it poorly, it is important that it is not their native language, they don’t even talk about it they think, yes, it’s natural for them, as they convinced themselves that this is an international language, but two languages ​​​​work, but that’s why the french are so offended by macron, who on international platforms still uses exclusively english , exclusively english, that is, in any case, yes, today on this very significant day we are discussing with you events

that will be prolonged, because there are a lot of meanings given, there will be a lot of things that will be discussed further. you will say the same, because what putin said about the serbian people, this shows our deep respect, that they cannot be broken, they can be destroyed, i ’m just about there, there will be a big conference, there will be a meeting in the russian house, we have already done a lot in this direction, the situation extremely difficult in serbia, probably the most difficult in 2011, but this is really the country and the serbian zone in general, because we know serbs not only in serbia, they live in the serbian republic in other areas of the balkan,

when it came to karabakh and with what pain

putin says pashinyan has zero at all, and as putin says, opening... i’ve been working towards this all my life, we expect to do it in 10 days, it will be a record, hack, on the verge of possibilities, we are all with him, because he one of these, at the maximum height , don’t go higher, you’ll just fall like a stone , at the speed of the wind, it’s a super cyclone, a killer cyclone, it’s like it’s chasing you. what do you want? lord of the wind! mmicri. well, in fact, the statements are, of course, very important to discuss and discuss here, but i will focus on three such parts that i seems to be fundamentally significant, because in fact the framework of the world order is presented in sufficiently drawn detail, to which russia

will strive and, most importantly, it is explained how it will strive for this, but in that part. that russia has real, genuine, independent allies in this matter, and reliance on such allies and cooperation is the basis of our method of building this world, because it is the method by which you do something that ultimately prevails in that what you created, yes, that's why you immediately need to build this new world on - on those principles that you consider necessary for the existence and functioning of this new world itself, which means in cooperation in mutual respect and taking into account the interests of the circle of such builders of the new world, it is defined, so much has been said about everything else

, by the way, were presented to everyone who wanted the six principles of this very new world, so i won’t... dwell now, everything needs to be analyzed in detail, but what does this mean, so i understand that this means the most important thing, the russian federation will not agree to any designs that will contradict these six principles, this is our position, we will defend it, but if someone interferes with something that does not correspond to the principles announced by the president of russia, it will not pass. let's announce these principles so that people understand, of course, i just want people to hear these principles, we must be aware of what we are striving for, what we want to achieve, and there is such an understanding in russia, first, we

we want to live in an open, interconnected world, in which no one will ever try to build artificial ones. on the way of communication between people, their creative realization and prosperity, there must be a barrier-free environment, this is what we must strive for, secondly, we want the diversity of the world not only to be preserved, but to be the foundation of universal development, imposing on any country or people how they should live, how to feel should be prohibited, true cultural and civilizational diversity will ensure the benefit of people and a balance of interests. third: we are for maximum representation, no one has the rights, and cannot, govern the world for others or on behalf of others. the world of the future is a world of collective decisions made at the level at which they are most effective and by the composition of participants who

are truly capable of making a significant contribution to resolving a specific problem. not one person decides for everyone, and not everyone even decides about everything, but those who are directly affected by this or that issue agree on what and how to do. fourth, we are for universal security and lasting peace built on respect for the interests of everyone, from great, large states to small countries, the main thing is to free international, international relations from the bloc approach, from the legacy: the colonial era and the cold war, we have been talking for decades about the indivisibility of security, that it is not possible to ensure the security of some at the expense of the safety of others? and indeed, harmony in this area is achievable, you just need to put aside pride, arrogance and stop looking at others as second-class partners, or

as outcasts or savages. fifth: we are for justice for all. the era of exploitation , no matter who it is, i have already said this twice in the past, countries and peoples are clearly aware of their interests and capabilities and are ready to rely on themselves. and this multiplies the strength. everyone should be provided with access to the benefits of modern development; attempts to limit it for any country or people should be considered an act of aggression. and that's exactly it. sixth: we are for equality, for the difference in the potentials of different countries, this is an absolutely objective factor, but no less objective is the fact that no one else... obeys, to make one's interests and needs dependent on anyone, and above all on those who are richer or stronger, and this is not just the natural state of the international

community, it is the quintessence of the entire historical experience of mankind. these are the principles to which we wish to adhere ourselves and to which we invite all our friends and colleagues to join. this is very important: historically it is more complicated, but the working definition is that the condition for the existence of a state of civilization is diversity and yes, in principle, these two there are enough parameters, yes, because, well, there are many

minds out there who have discussed this matter, but in principle, you can apply a limitation to this to say that if we mentally imagine that something happened to the earth like this, but only one state of civilization has survived, it is a civilization if, in principle, it can reproduce the fullness of humanity. if this is so, by and large, yes, in this sense, and this is how people who thought about it discussed it, so the fact that the world will be structured by states, civilizations - this is the most important, most important point, by the way, there will be a very tough discussion here, now it will begin, they are already imposing on us that we must be decolonized, that’s because we have always colonized everyone, as it turns out, that’s what the west thinks, well by the way, very...' because the word empire itself has always been divided in its meaning into colonial and non-colonial empires, but russia has never

been a colonial empire, it was not, by the way , curiously, into a state of civilization, those states of the empire that are not were colonial, like in europe, i’ll just illustrate whether they exist now. european civilization, a good question, because well, the anglo-saxons claim that this will be all of them, and that’s why they speak english, so i can say, well, probably some kind of anglo-saxon structure with the dominance of the anglo-saxon world, they will try now build, here is a civilization , a big big question arises in relation to europe, because the european union, as an attempt to create a state of civilization, has completely gone bankrupt, this can already be done for sure to say, an attempt, well, on the one hand, you know, there is an interesting division

of some minds in europe, to create a state of european civilization, on the other hand, those who manipulated this desire, the anglo-saxons, who, of course, did their own thing, they are not a state of civilization created in europe, but created. which will allow them to compete, to control all states on the european continent, so this is a very important, important point, and of course, this is a whole, whole direction for thought, it’s about the civilizational approach, about states of civilization in connection with history, with empires, this is very important for what we will ultimately build. well, the third point, dmitry gennadyvich and vladimir rudolfovich have already partially discussed this, regarding nuclear and military components in general, that’s why we

can fight for these principles, and defend them and generally build everything in cooperation with our friends, this is very interesting moment, you know, well, firstly , of course, about the petrel, that’s because when it... i heard that the tests were completed, after the tests that were planned, they were successful, and then it’s a matter of putting them on combat duty, which will be carried out in the near future, but if it’s about hypersound, they were talking about something else, there are some experiments, well, i’m talking about america, it’s true that all of them have been unsuccessful so far, but at least they have announced this direction of military-technical scientific research. then about rockets with no limitation of flight range on a nuclear engine - this is absolute know-how at the moment in our country and

need to. understand that the appearance of this type of weapon, and its successful completion of testing, can only be the result of a long-term strategy and a planned target approach designed for a very long period. i go into the shower, a shell flies into the office, you and rudskoy made some mistakes in you , naturally, i make what you would have done differently, we could have won, those who went against a peaceful city and unleashed a bloodbath are criminals, then such the option chosen was not parliamentary, not popular, and

there was no need to shoot from tanks, a spectacle it was, of course, bad, to put it mildly, it was from here that the same broadcast was conducted, which was watched by the whole world, the fact is that each side believed that the instigator was the other side, i myself fulfilled the oath in those days, even after 30 years, i believe that i do not know the whole truth about the events of 1993; i am going through the most severe political crisis in post-soviet history, which will end in bloodshed.

we will take on this case, it will be an honest detective story.

there were a lot of drug addicts in the ranks of my unit, we said that confidence in appears in his actions, the fighters who were running near me were just as chaotically shooting at houses, shooting at windows, you understood that you were shooting at the residents of mariupol, you understood, but i was under anesthesia, those pills that we saw were the most serious a tranquilizer, a person forgets what pain, fatigue are, everything that is used in ukraine is factory-made by research institutes, nato ones, right there is the apey spray based on nalububin. the cia clearly continues to conduct similar activities around the world. to the head dozens of those same biological laboratories in ukraine immediately come. what is wine? wine

is. i want to get acquainted with the youngest winemakers in russia, i became interested in winemaking when i was 12 years old, my father instilled this in me, my grandparents were moonshine brewers, so i think it all started from this, winemaking has a million options, you can be as creative as you like you have enough imagination, now i want to ask: a question to all those who, including in this studio, when they came here, shouted that our leadership has no strategy, i i want to say hello to everyone, big ardent greetings, wave my hand like this about this, now as for the doctrine , the most important thing has been said, you just need to be able to listen, i agree, by the way, that they don’t listen, well, they don’t know how to listen, but what does it mean?