[000:00:00;00] based on deep relations, historical relations, i would like to renew the gratitude of iraq, russia for their support during the fight against terrorism, the war against terrorism, for providing us with weapons, weapons, so that we could resist the armed gangs of terrorists, without a doubt , this history of relations is very valuable, 2004 was of great importance for the relations between our countries, our visit, we strive through it to strengthen interaction and develop relations

that have excellent prospects in political sphere, we have many opportunities, various opportunities, we have a good foundation, there are russian companies that work, in particular in the oil and gas sector, our countries play an important role in the oil market, this coordination should be based on taking into account the mechanisms of supply and demand, taking into account the interests of investors, producers and consumers, we will discuss these

issues, the input of today’s meeting tomorrow we will also have a suitable opportunity to discuss these issues, exchange views on energy issues, which of course, is in the attention of many, including the iraqi government, our visit is going through a period when we are observing the implementation of a large... implementation of a large development project that will ensure - facilitating trade between asia and europe, will promote integration, transport corridors, i i mean, first of all , the north-south, this will support and have a positive impact

on all countries in the region around the world. mr. president, our visit is taking place at a very, very precise time; now there is a complex and dangerous development of events in palestinian, palestine, this is a natural result, the result of israel continuing to commit violations against the rights of palestinians. the international community remained silent and failed to fulfill its obligations under internationally recognized resolutions. we are now witnessing another intifada of palestinian uprising, demanding an end to these violations of their rights, an obvious escalation, a very dangerous escalation, as a result of which

civilians are dying. now we all bear responsibility, as arab countries, as islamic countries, and also together with russia, a permanent member of the security council, a great power, this is a moral, ethical responsibility that... including on the major powers in order to stop these violations of the rights of the palestinians, to stop the blockade of the gaza strip, of course, today iraq in its policy is to support, maintain stability in all regions , including with regard to the ukrainian crisis, we suffered greatly from

blockades, from war, and of course, therefore our position is firm, searching for peaceful solutions through dialogue to end conflicts that have very negative consequences at the humanitarian level and at the economic level, of course , this visit is aimed at discussing these issues, discussing our common positions, relations, we also want to contribute to easing the suffering of the region, establishing stability and security in the middle east throughout the entire world. thank you.

these were shots of the russian-iraqi negotiations that are taking place today in the kremlin. well, then there’s a live broadcast from the russian foreign ministry. at home. but i think this one the question would be worth asking further. now we move on to the situation around ukraine, but the nazi kiev regime, against the background of a failed counter-offensive, as they say, continues to take out its anger on the civilian population of the russian regions, and apparently, today's ukrainian nazis, like the ideological idols of those times, bandera, bandera, shukhevych and so on, they can only fight the unarmed residents of donbass, zaporozhye, kherson region and other constituent entities of the russian federation by striking residential areas, they are also cowards. hiding behind people's backs civilian population, hiding behind them like a living brush. the other day , a lot of information appeared in the media about the murder on september 13 by a right-wing militant of 22 residents

of snegerivka, kherson region, occupied by the ukrainian armed forces, for their pro-russian views. it is noted that among the killers is a member of this extremist organization, evgeniy karavan, who already knows the names of the five dead. we are confident that all the circumstances of this tragedy will be established and guilt will be established. based on the evidence collected will be brought before the court and punished severely punishment. the courts of the russian federation and the investigative committee of russia continue to pass sentences on ukrainian neo-nazis who have committed serious crimes against civilians . thus, the ukrainian serviceman mitin, who threw a grenade through the window of a residential building in the north of donetsk in may 22 , was sentenced to 15 years in prison. a militant of the neo-nazi organization azob subodin, who robbed locals at gunpoint in mariupol last march. received 16 years in prison, three more azov residents, kurki stepanov, shevele, were sentenced to 22 years each imprisonment to each for shelling residential buildings with high-explosive fragmentation mines in mariupol, in february twenty-two.

the commander of the vsso chilovsky, who gave the order to kill the residents of mariupol in march twenty-two, was sentenced in absentia to twenty- six years. another ukrainian neo-nazi birin, who in march last year in severo-donetsk carried out mining of residential buildings, this led to the death of three civilians, received 20 years in prison, the ukrainian fighter antonov was sentenced to twenty-four years in prison for the murder of a civilian a resident of mariupol in march twenty-two . the investigative committee of russia indicted in absentia a number of former high-ranking officials of the kiev regime, who, as members of the national security and defense council of ukraine in april 14, voted for the so-called anti-terrorist operation in the donbass. it led to great loss of life and destruction of civilian infrastructure. among them are secretary of the national security and defense council parubi, prosecutor general makhnitsky, chairman of the state border service lytvyn, measures are being taken to search for them and arrest them. work to bring individuals from among the military and political

leadership of ukraine to justice will continue. kiev neo-nazis will not be able to escape justice. the zelsky regime continues to engage in professional begging and theatrically clinical weapons in its western countries. owners. today in brussels the sixteenth meeting of the contact group on defense assistance to the kiev regime will take place in the ramstay format. presided over by the american military command. and it is expected that kiev will again demand the speedy shipment of air defense systems , long-range missiles, and new ammunition to the armed forces of ukraine. with each such gathering, his appetites only grow. it is noteworthy that against the backdrop of current events in the middle east, a member of the house was introduced by the us congress, margery teilar greene. suggested that in the clashes in israel weapons could have been used, among other things, taken from ukraine, which were previously supplied there by nato countries. i draw your attention to the link we are sure to

we will also post in the text of today’s briefing, we published a selection of statements that were made about the lineament of the ministry of foreign affairs, in particular during our briefings for a year and a half with calls for the world community to realize, not so much to evaluate, but simply... to wake up from a lethargic sleep, because we cited the facts of how literally from the very first of these large-scale deliveries, the weapons that nato countries... in turn, the usa and britain supplied to the kiev regime, do not reach the ukrainian armed forces, this was ours, in fact speaking, the main message is to provide the whole world with information that these weapons could appear anywhere in the world, since they immediately went to the black market. we talked about the european continent, we talked about eurasia in general, we talked. including about

other continents and the middle east too. we have collected all these statement statements in one collection. look, we ’ve been talking for a year and a half about something that we’re just now starting to talk about. why? why didn’t the west see this information? well, the answer is obvious, because all those who should do this work, all these very western media, never wrote about it, not because they did not have information. because their order was different, you couldn’t pay attention to it, they didn’t pay attention. it is very regrettable that in the west, yes, albeit with a delay, and regrettable, precisely because this delay became fatal, on the other hand, it is probably gratifying that they have begun to see the light, it is regrettable that it is late, it is gratifying that, in principle, at least

someone then, let there be only a few, but to these units... listen, begin to understand what is happening in general, russia has long warned the sponsors of the kiev regime about the high risks of the weapons supplied to them ending up on the black market and spreading throughout the world, this is what actually happened, and now add to this information the question that is being asked now everything that antony blinken, the us secretary of state, is diligently avoiding, and why, why, the service of the united states of america did not tell anyone anything about the operation planned in the middle east, is it a failure, but no one in the usa was fired, or did they just know and not say anything? on october 1, the high representatives of the european union for foreign affairs and security policy, speaking in odessa, continued to create inside

the so-called. peace fund, a special fund worth 20 billion euros, from which in the next 4 years they will finance the supply of weapons to the ssu, apparently peace in ukraine will not come soon, its western, western sponsors of all these projects intend to fight with the hands of ukraine to the last ukrainian, so what? what will happen with these next arms deliveries, maybe now someone in europe will think about it? such sentiments speak volumes. helping kiev is a cheap way to make sure that moscow does not pose a threat to nato, this is another evidence that for the west, its kiev puppets , ukrainians serve as expendable material on the way to achieving their selfish goal.

large-scale scale, and it seems to me that no one even denies it anymore, corruption in ukraine, this scale, this impudence, absolute, some kind of unbridled impudence, is shocking already donors of the kiev regime, by the way, one after another, corruption scandals just break out, with participants in the kiev regime, and somehow you know, on their own, they go out, someone extinguishes them there, very successfully, under the auspices of the banking sector, even the former the head of the european commission, jean-claude juncker, on october 6, in an interview with the german publication augeburger algemay, said that ukraine is a corrupt country, i emphasize once again, ukraine is a corrupt country at all levels, and, what do you think, in kiev right away. began to make excuses and naturally said that it was

hand of moscow. zelsky bluntly called such information a russian narrative aimed at splitting western support for ukraine. no, the information about corruption in ukraine is not a russian narrative - it is a fact, it is a reality, but a cure from which, from which there will be no deliverance in the near future, because when bareilles will declare what they are creating inside.. . funds of the world, another funds in the amount of 20 billion euros, and ukrainian corruption and the corruption system - this is, of course, a whole system that is shot there, will to applaud, realizing that the replenishment does not end, ukraine continues to mock its own cultural sites, cultural heritage; on october 5, in kiev, a monument to the soviet writer alexander ostrovsky, erected almost 50 years ago, was demolished. the authorities of the kiev region

reported the seizure of four hundred thousand russian-language books and publications by russian, soviet and russian authors from local libraries. you know, just a year and a half ago, scholz laughed when they told him about the genocide of the russian-speaking population from the outside kiev regime, then they seemed to stop laughing, some kind of grin, a grin remained, but in principle the facts speak for themselves, and what is, for example, non-ethnic cleansing, when hundreds... thousands of books are confiscated from libraries, please tell me , what's this? or according to ethnic cleansing, this means exclusively physical violence against people, or their physical displacement, but no, not only, and generation is not only the physical destruction of a person, it is the creation of

the impossible, it is the creation of conditions for impossible stay in a certain territory, this is the creation of unbearable circumstances for people, in fact, this is what is happening, once again, just think about it, 400,000 publications were seized from local libraries, and from october 4 to 8, the thirtieth book forum with a telling name was held in ukraine census of the future, they learned to rewrite in ukraine, thanks to the efforts of western teachers, of course, and it is noteworthy that according to the media. in this event among the main participants there were not representatives of literary circles, but western journalists, who are distinguished by their russophobic views, among its partners was the unknown us agency for international development, well, you understand perfectly well, no book

fair can do without the us agency for international development. in hitler 's germany, books were burned and destroyed in the same way, the great heritage of previous generations was sold for accusations, and... in the most cruel way, however, after the victory over fatschism in memory of those tragic pages of history in in berlin, on the bebelplatz square , a monument was erected, a monument to the burned books, i think that the time will come in kiev to give due justice to the desecrated work of great russian literature. in its cavernous russophobia, the war with the russian language and culture as a whole , the kiev regime is not limited, with the support of the united states and the patriarchate of constantinople, the ukrainian authorities continue the crusade against canonical orthodoxy. on october 5 in chernigov, the ukrainian orthodox church, under the pretext, as they said, of the restoration was taken away trinity cathedral, transfiguration and assumption cathedrals. moreover, the last two have special historical value, since

they belong to the pre-mongol era. as a result , believers were deprived of the opportunity to enter churches for prayer and worship. the process is led by the director of the department of cultural heritage, tamina, who previously took part in sealing the premises of the kiev-pechersk lavra. the authorities do not hide that the purpose of this, i won’t say otherwise, legal chaos, is to confiscate in favor of the kiev regime, which is in use ukrainian orthodox church real estate of the chernigov ancient reserve. all this fits into the anti-religious and predatory policy of the kiev regime of forcibly depriving the canonical church and its parishes with subsequent transfer to the so-called orthodox church of ukraine , no matter what provocations kiev staged, no matter what types of weapons were supplied to ukraine by the collective west, all the tasks of the special military operations will certainly be

implemented, as has already been said many times spoke the russian leadership. and again. about double standards, which are the main threat to modern humanity, on october 9, the european commission for democracy through law, this is the name of this institution, if we speak in familiar terms, the same venice commission of the council of europe, published the text of a new opinion on the ukrainian law on national minorities, this document was approved at the plenary on october 7, just the day before, the conclusion was issued in connection with the recently adopted amendments to the mentioned sad known according to the ukrainian side, these legislative innovations are aimed at fulfilling the recommendations of the venice commission to create conditions for supposedly

proper respect for the rights of persons belonging to national minorities. how do you think it all ended, the same thing. the venice commission scrupulously analyzes the new legislation and welcomes some cosmetic improvements, also notes such minor shortcomings that are in the text of the law, but not... under the doubt of the main the legality of the principle of restrictions enshrined in the law, that is, discrimination at the official level in relation to the russian language. the only thing that worries the commission experts, who formally declared their commitment to the right of national minorities to enjoy the achievements of their own culture and use their own language, is, in fact, the time period during which such discriminatory provisions will remain in effect. representatives of the structure directly state that restrictions regarding the russian language, that is, if... to name things by their own names, discrimination is the result of alleged russian aggression and advocates only that these

measures should not last so long. the fact that for more than 7 years, the people of donbass were shelled by the kiev regime only because they wanted to preserve their cultural identity, which had been formed over centuries , including being enshrined in the legal field, no one in the west wants to know, as for themselves, that regarding the discriminatory provisions of the law themselves, the kiev regime is gently, you know, reprimanded, but nothing more, in fact, the venice commission reproduces its attitude towards ukrainian legislation, which it demonstrated before, including the previous version of the law on national... minorities in june of this year, all this is no longer surprising, it continues

to shock, this suggests that in gone is the authority of the venice commission as a once respected advisory body that claimed to be impartial. we know well that criticism from the commission can be very harsh, however, when it’s about... i don’t mean our russian double standards, which are already monstrous: the principle of objectivity is trampled and thrown away, this very potential of expertise is used for purely politicized purposes, and from here it becomes anti-scientific. another topic, the situation surrounding the investigation of terrorist attacks on gas pipelines into the nord stream, this is a similar situation, by the way, in

the middle east, the position of the leading nato countries, they know nothing about what happened there, nothing is happening, no substantive information and no one shares why have the authorities of germany, denmark and sweden failed to make their calculations, their plans, have something to hide over the past year? provide the international community with any clear information regarding at least the preliminary results of national investigations into the terrorist attack on the nord stream gas pipelines. against this background , all sorts of misleading theories are thrown into the media space in order to divert suspicion from the real perpetrators of this crime. at the same time, substantive investigations by journalists are not commented on in principle. russia is interested in ensuring that the real perpetrators of the terrorist attack on a key energy infrastructure facility, which led to devastating economic and environmental consequences, do not escape responsibility. and this year, on our initiative, four meetings of the un security council were created

, including on september 26, during which we announced the start of work on a draft statement by the chairman of the security council. i assure you that this topic will not leave the agenda of the un security council. russia will regularly raise this issue at the un platform at the security council in particular. the purpose of the document i am talking about now in the draft chairman's statement is to send a clear signal of the unity of the council in condemning this atrocity. of course, the anglo-saxon duo will do their best to interfere with the development of such a document; we remember how the same british blocked any attempts to bring the topic up for discussion at the security council, especially in some way, i don’t know, to translate the discussion into practical action... and yet russia also proposed conducting an investigation under

the auspices of the un secretary general, russia introduced many practical initiatives, asked questions, invited an expert to we remember how fiercely the anglo-saxons, the anglo-saxons blocked all this, well, never mind , we will move on, we hope that our western colleagues, we take this, of course, the words in quotation marks will at least show some respect for international law, since they sit on the un security council and show a desire to seriously work on the project, ultimately, only those who can be disinterested in an objective investigation directly related to this crime, i would like to respond to a number of pentagon statements contained in the updated version of the american strategy to counter weapons of mass destruction. first of all , the thesis that russia is developing some supposedly leftover

biological weapons program from the ussr is surprising. what are you saying? i would like to ask a question and get some kind of answer, the fact is that our actions in the biological sphere are absolutely transparent. annually, transferred within the framework of confidence-building measures, conventions for the prohibition of biological and toxin weapons, information about russian biological objects, clearly confirms russia’s commitment to its obligations under the convention, the purely peaceful nature of all russian biological activities. these very unsubstantiated voices... the united states addressed to us can only be considered as an attempt to once again invent something that does not exist, to blame those who are not guilty, and, so to speak, to reward those who are not involved, and for those who have their heads in the cannon to speak out as heroes and distract the attention of the world community from its own unseemly steps of violation

of the convention on the prohibition of biological toxin weapons. the united states has still not withdrawn its reservation to the 1925 geneva protocol , which prohibits the use of biological weapons ; in addition, almost 100 years later, in 2001, washington opposes the resumption of negotiations on a legally binding protocol with an effective verification mechanism, despite persistent calls from the majority of parties to the convention . in this regard, serious questions about the pentagon's military biological activities conducted in laboratories around the world. far from the north american continent, but close to the russian borders. we talked about this a lot, and there will also be many links to these materials published in the text of today’s brief. apparently we went with our favorite technique, the best defense is an attack, but this story will not work, we back up our position with facts and documents. a blatant example of this

activity was the facts of implementation that were revealed during the special military military-biological program in ukraine with the support of the us defense ministry, pentagon-affiliated structures , including private companies, analysis of the data obtained allows us to conclude that the americans, under the pretext of peaceful biological research , are implementing projects outside their national territory aimed at developing components of biological weapons. our well-reasoned questions to the united states, and well, ukraine , are difficult to say to the american wards on the territory of ukraine, voiced at multilateral platforms, including, including the un security council, let me remind you, our calls were supported by many states, but have not yet received a proper response, they remain open, and require, of course, receiving some information on this matter. in addition, the american strategy once again reproduces the standard set of insinuations from washington regarding the alleged violation

of the convention on the prohibition of chemical weapons by the russian federation. british intelligence services to the skripal case, then their colleagues from germany, the alleged poisoning of navalny, as well as also, as if we were hiding from the organization for the prohibition of chemical weapons certain information, again about the allegedly existing facilities for the production, development and storage of chemical weapons, here, frankly speaking, i again want to recall the catchphrase: recently voiced by the president of russia, whose lowing mare, that’s for sure, it seems to me that the united states should not, in principle , suspect anyone at all, let alone blame anyone for not observing the fundamental principles of international law in the field of biological safety, let them start with themselves, that’s where