let’s translate from clerical to understandable, everything is not so scary if there are instructions, so we congratulate vadim franovich, we’ll give the floor to andrey, how? by the way, have you seen everything in your life? well, i can’t say, i’ll now show you something that you definitely haven’t seen, that is, more disgusting, in fact, in its falsity and deceitfulness of the picture, i haven’t seen it for a long time, look, scholz in kip, that is, this is the one for the opening of a new synagogues, the same person who supplies tanks with crosses to ukraine, the same person who supports

ukrainian nazism, built on bandera and shikhevich, who are terrible, which means the murderers of the jewish people, he is now in a pile of all the gods, that is, here is a person absolutely devoid of some, well, just historical tact of taste, let’s start with biden, and then i’ll get there before the europeans, when we speak, we listen to american presidents, in principle , from the oval office it was always truman, who... in a televised address to the nation from the oval office, emphasized the idea of ​​why we we are entering the cold war, well, the idea of ​​containment, there may be examples of the same byne being compared with carter, so carter spoke on december 15, 1978, announcing that we were establishing diplomatic relations with china, this had to be explained to the americans, they fought, fought

here we are establishing with the people's republic of china, after september 11, 2001, bush spoke, so i looked at what biden was doing, yes, here we are now, it is clear that for every researcher such a speech is important, it sits in the mind, that now there will be something, so he must describe something, describe the world, when you say, for example, now a period of 5 years was mentioned, but very simply, the world order must be built during the end of this term and during biden’s next term, that’s strictly speaking the main idea, then, when he talks about 50, 50 years, a year that radically changed the world order, i will say right away, well, in 1975 there was the final act of helsinki, and some liberals believe that a new world order is calculated from here, although everyone else denies it, because actually speaking of who created it, these are two powers, they took a pause, a pause in the cold war, then they continued it, but in 7 years... went to

the united states senate, it is clear that the new world order then began, in fact, and this is an echo, this is an echo of what blinkon said, for example, on september 13, when he gave a lecture at johns hopkins, this year, and blinkon said that the world order that emerged after the cold war is now over, ended, here this is the reaction of the american administration, the current administration, i don’t mean biden himself, now i can even... i can even say that you don’t have to come to amali, he himself will bring everything to an end, so here in general, even you have turned away from kamal, no, from kamala, andrey, he denies this, but how could you, so this is the reaction, this was the reaction of the administration, which continues, the reaction to what happened in august september, to brix, first of all, to the twenty, this is what a world order is emerging that

virtually excludes the united states. i i am confident that the united states with its power will participate in the formation of a new world order, but not as a hegemon. and now they will have to fit in. andrey, please remind us how many countries did biden convene at that time for a democracy forum? 76, that is, it turns out, then at first there were 111 there, then 76, that is, it turns out that the train was blocked from... it was now relatively recently, and the americans began to reassess, yes, it began in early september, the level of ability to gather countries , here at the beginning of september, one more thing biden said in his speech, and where did china go, where did the existential adversary of the united states, which is the main one, go? both republicans and democrats agree on this.

and what is written in the doctrinal documents of the united states, china has disappeared, there he made the indo-pacific region, threats , that is, in other words, the whole speech... biden boiled down to the fact that we have two conflicts that need to be defended, democracy, threats slightly different, but they all threaten the american-centric world, so the main idea is that congress should give money to fight these threats. the next day he sends a request. and here the request is also typical, 61.4 billion for ukraine, this fight is considered the main conflict, and 14.3 million. this is for israel, to help israel, for now, for now, in my opinion, what now says that the conflict may not flare up, the american administration has not yet fully decided, yes, they are concentrating troops, but the troops are concentrating, they are all constantly they claim that this conflict does not

flare up; they are already afraid of even two conflicts, although they previously said that they will pull three, now they are not pulling one, this one conflict , they are throwing it at these guys, at the europeans, with whom they held a summit, adopted the final declaration, there are 34 paragraphs, six of them for ukraine, one for israel, that’s the ratio , the ratio of how the current administration treats these conflicts, to whom they would like to shift part of the time, not, well, let’s be objective, after all, the length of the front line, which is incomparable between israel and ukraine, of course, and the size of the population, well then there is a thank you category. but to me i immediately liked the ukrainians who said: how much, little, little, little, little, no , this is not enough for us for anything, why are you giving so little, give me normal money, but i liked the ursuloin most of all, who, who generally admitted

, i have always considered an atlanticist, but when i start my speech with the fact that even out of seven children, two of me are practically american citizens, well, her twins were born at a time when her husband was working at stanford, she was there, with him.. .it was and apparently absorbed american democracy very quickly pace, so ursula fonder stated that - the eu is ready to allocate 50 billion for it, it really does not have the authority to make such a statement, the fact of the matter is that it was her desire, which she expressed on june 20, this is a request from the european commission , an additional contribution must be made, it has not been agreed upon, it has not been agreed upon, it was her who wanted it, it has not been accepted by the european council, hence, so to speak, they have a complete clash with michel, that is, the german ursula vonderlein against the belgian charles michel, but there is also a bunch of its employees, yes, the european commission is an executive body, heads of state, they actually deal with michel, and most of these

european states, they seem to believe that for now at least this cannot be confirmed, this must be discussed, and many do not even agree that they can provide this , but what i would like to say, by the way, you bought knitting needles, you bought knitting needles, nails, nails, nails, buttons, yes, of course, this new package of sanctions against russia offers us this, so it’s creative, finally we will start making needles, i think that in continuation of this line, the americans don’t care. they continue to throw it at the europeans, that is, involving them to a greater and greater extent, positioning themselves as if we are always standing behind your back, but we will even signal, but ukraine is your conflict, i don’t think that in the united states it will pass so easily

this biden package is worth 106 billion, because firstly there is no speaker, there are still speakers, but they are on monday, well, in the same package, they are protecting the southern borders of the united states. perhaps millions of dollars in registration of migrants, that is, not border security, and the registration of migrants who arrived illegally, there is another interesting point, if you analyze yes, they are now directly paying the pension, pension, maintenance, of a number of ukrainian officials, and for all palestinians, 100 dollars each, how much they allocated, well approximately yes, but they are going to ukraine and they are going to ukraine, now, in my opinion, they are paying 1.2 billion, but they are going to reduce it to 850, the officials don’t care, i just mean, besides,

yes, but muslim countries will say, what is this in general, that is, this is generally how to understand it, that is, it turns out, white, that is, this is a form, absolutely, here is this split between the global, the slave of russia... well, let's put it this way, i will be more diplomatic , brix, which unites the global world around itself, these are the 56 states that are part of the so-called collective west, that is , those that follow the croatian policy of the united states, which have practically completely lost their sovereignty, just as europe has lost, new ones are based on this the world order that they are trying to establish, what world order, listen, world order? there is always order, andrey, well, you can call it, but chaos is also a certain variation of order, if you call

any form of organization order, but this does not help anyone, yes, but what we see, we all see how biden has de facto unleashed two wars, the most difficult ones, he talks about some kind of order, but he is not capable, let’s be objective , after all, the middle east was unleashed, the administrations were unleashed before biden, he continues it, let’s be objective, the administration... before biden did not exist, because in one form or another he was always either close to the administration, or in the administration, but all the time in these political circles, congress, well, once the congress, once the vice president, well, listen, well, once... then vice president, but speaking of, they torpedoed the middle east congress as a quartet, this is bush, well, that’s it, but i ’m just leading to what kind of order is he talking about, when he is not able to foresee the consequences of his own decisions,

the order is always formed after the end any major conflict, let it watches our program, on this program it was said that the way out of covid will be war, we have talked about this many times, there are simply laws of historical development, always from any. such large global pandemics resulted in wars, you can deny it, you can try to come up with something, but this is inevitable, but no one argues with the fact that order, so to speak, is built after, but there is no need to build anything yet, because that it is unclear who will get this honor, the devastation will be such that it is unclear who is building, what will happen, so cataclysm, it can be different, the thing is that we say all the time, all the time i emphasize the idea that the war may not be hot.

you don’t have to fire at each other, and the state ceases to exist, like the soviet one, but we have entered a phase when the war can only be hot, this is now a feature, and the speed of ignition of these wars, in particular, this is due to the different role of the media, because since all the crimes and all the horror are shown live, then politics is already social pressure is also at work. the war, it is already underway, it is, it is not of a global nature, for now, perhaps , well, okay, look, you can, you can write several scenarios for how it will develop, not a global war, 1,300 km of the front line, more than 50 countries with one on the other hand, 50-odd, this is not global, please, you have a small front line nearby, there are 30 kilometers there, probably for now yes, that is, well, there’s more there, but, but by and large, what’s going on there, the whole the islamic world has come together head-on, again

with nato without turkey, iran is about to flare up, your far east could flare up, you can even, now it’s even impossible to imagine where else it could flare up, no, volodya, here’s the second option, this is the war now, the middle east conflict, why it is dangerous, this is correct, this arc of instability can spread to the far east, especially considering that china is now holding joint military schools there. something goes down then it really can flare up, it will go, i think there are two scenarios for how you can analyze this speech and, in general, any speech by the current president of the united states, in one case you can say that this is all frivolous or a benefit for some of your internal political ambitions, then you can not. leave, if

we proceed from the fact that it is necessary to analyze textually what was said, i think that this is at least useful, because if it turns out that it was all out of place, we will at least be ready for those challenges that are clearly visible there. the first thing i want to draw attention to is philosophical politics the part in which president biden says that in this future world, america can unite humanity, unite the world, i think that not... mr. biden, not any other us president, and moreover, no president of any states in the world, in the future world order , will not be able to unite humanity, not because humanity is now divided. than before, it is now divided in exactly the same way as it was divided in the middle ages and in the 16th, 19th centuries, and in antiquity, but humanity has never yet realized its division to the extent in which today, the level of development of technology allows a person today, being in the desert regions of africa, there

south of the sahara, somewhere from the phone, to see how his peer lives, in western europe. country to be amazed at how big the gulf and difference is between them, it is unlikely that 500 years ago something like this could have been thought of; a similar process probably took place during the industrial revolution, when from the villages, as part of such urbanization, the working class began move to cities saw that this is their way of life and their idea of ​​life does not correspond at all to what happens a few kilometers away from them and how people live in cities, but now it... is already acquiring such a massive, very large-scale character, therefore, in the future world order, whatever it may be, no matter who it is its main characters, i think, will benefit most from the power that can offer not a universalist model, but within the framework of the era of modernity , which is dead, it no longer exists, therefore any universalism, any attempt to

unite all people under some slogan , she it will simply be ineffective, ineffective, and the country that will win will be the one that can offer a model of the most civilized spending and then cooperation on equal terms , interaction with each other, at least within the framework of such enlarged civilizations. anyone who tries to shovel this under one modernist ideology is doomed to failure in the foreign policy arena, i have no doubt about it. the second thing i want to draw attention to here in connection with this is what concerns the message itself. biden and what he says about this world order, there is one very big difference, in my opinion, between his position and what the president of our country says. on the one hand, it seems that both are talking about the crisis of this world order, but the difference is very big, in my opinion, that the president has never said

that the institutions that exist within the current world order should stop existence, international law. should no longer be accepted as a basis for interaction between countries, and everything needs to be demolished and built anew. the president only talks about changes in the environment in which this world order operates, he says, now the environment is unipolar, it would be good if it were multipolar, and so it will be. biden, in turn, says something completely different; he says, as far as i understand him, that the world order has ceased to function at all, that is, there are no more constraining factors, neither legal nor institutional, that would suggest the need for at least some kind of to agree on some kind of right and some kind of rules, not that in the united states the last 30 years have been very constrained by them, but now it is being stated openly that there are no longer any institutions, no rights, no rights at all , no norms, nothing else, and what remains then , then only the right of the strong remains, what

has been said here several times already, that military force , the ability to militarily solve... the problem at the moment is a sufficient basis for one or another format of settlement various conflicts, there are so many conflicts in the world that if each of them is now resolved by force, it will no longer be called a world war, in this regard, i think that we are now seeing, i completely agree with andreich, that all these world orders are formed as a result of major conflicts. and many of our colleagues claim and think that we are now in the middle of this conflict, i am sure that no, i rather have the impression that we are now in the process of positioning when countries they are forming blocs, accumulating forces, potential in order to begin this conflict, and the most dangerous thing in what is happening is that it is now becoming the norm to simply take one side and that means supplying

weapons, then justifying it politically, informationally, whatever, so that she simply resolves the issue by force, but if the situation in the world is brought to this, then the whole world will be engulfed in endless conflicts, this concerns us, in the applied sense, how this affects us, we often hear various theses about ukraine about how this conflict should end, in a world in which there is no law of institutions, there are absolutely no agreements, so the american side, the russian side seems... directly says that you either decide by force, by military means this conflict, or everything else is excluded, that’s it, we don’t recognize anything else, no formats, no agreements, as for europe and european countries, i have from the first day, the conflict on the territory of ukraine, from the first day of the special military operation, there

the strong impression is that for the united states of america, this conflict has two practical meanings. the first, obviously, is the containment of the russian federation, no one is hiding it, the second is the drying out of everything that is possible from european countries, i have no doubts about this, there is a clear one for this. this is the leadership of the european union, which does not possess any level of legitimacy among the european population, is not accountable to anyone and can afford to make any statements it likes, allocate financial resources, disappear into oblivion to for the next formation of the composition of the european parliament, the european commission and so on, this resource is used by the americans, in my opinion, quite successfully, because if trump had to come to nato and say that well, be people, at least spend 2% of these there

to the fact that yes, they said, yes, where are there, well, two, now there are two, someone is already starting competitions, and we will be three, we will allocate 4%, we are gorodistonians, but that means there are already such competitions within this block who will spend more money and so it turns out that we need to add another fact to this. biden in this address made two statements that i want to draw attention to, the first is that he was on board number one, secretly flying to poland, then boarded a train with darkened windows and secretly traveled for 10 hours to kiev, why on i’m paying attention to this because it’s funny, i really want to amuse our viewers, i didn’t come up with a word, that is, in the performance , it probably resonates with the population there in western countries, i imagine that the forces, who would like to organize sabotage against the president of the united states, were unable to do this, because the windows on the train were tinted, which means they couldn’t handle it, imagine how

american air force one could secretly fly through eken, just secretly, secretly, yes, and the president usa, on all the fly-totars it was written secretly that he was flying, flying secretly, and he raised the collar of his raincoat and put on his safety glasses so that no one would know and , yes, he fell, for sure, the second statement within the framework of this speech, which he drew attention to says this is really important statement, it is central there, he says, when we ask congress for money to finance ukraine, in fact we are asking for funds to purchase new weapons to replace those that we give to the ukrainians, this is a very important thesis, because they first forced the europeans to do it, give everything you have to... the last to the ukrainians, so that later you can say, buy , you didn’t want to buy from me, now you want, but from nowhere else, you want, go there from iran, buy martyrs, you can’t, then come to me , that's it, there is no other option, and secondly for

to create this opportunity for ourselves, to create a reason for the population to say, whatever you want, we have nothing left with empty warehouses , we gave everything to defend democracy in ukraine, so we now need to finance the country’s military-industrial complex at three prices, everything fits in quite well, so we hope , at some point they will not need such an excellent working and effective scheme for him or the republicans who will replace him, anyone else, as long as it works, it seems to me that they will fully support it, it is very profitable and an effective scheme for them, i agree, all of ossetia collects various kinds of donations and sends them to the front, here you feel the price of life, step aside, what we have enough of, this is what attention brings us, it’s also very pleasant. this is difficult, i knit on every

stitch i say, please stay alive, this is already becoming a talisman, i cut socks from yarn. at first we started with balaclavas, but then stretchers followed, and we have been continuing to help for the past year. this car belonged to my grandmother. everything for the front, everything for victory, so we’re working on it. the north military district has united the nation, everyone worries about those who are here and helps in any way they can. and you used to fly, i didn’t do a lot of things before, and then i did. it’s a dream, but to fly with me, you promise now and won’t take it, i won’t take it, i’ve been waiting all my life when we can... just

talk, you don’t want to hear anyone but yourself, we can’t put it off, we’re preparing a flight, it’s hard to keep up with man, dad, i want to see you, who is trying to catch the wind, every day i write a letter to him, and then, when he comes back, i give him mine, and he goes to the storm for me, why are you bothering me, what do you want, let him go down wherever he goes. every time i worry when he leaves, but he comes back, he promised me. lord of the wind, come on, fedor, hold on.

got used to watching videos online, stopped working, install it. we open, watch, russian channels, all series, movies and cartoons, educational programs and documentaries, watch, watch in the application or on the website,

vadim frantsivich, i can’t help but thank you for congratulations, you, vladimir rudolfevi , in turn, were congratulated by the president of our country, i mentioned this not only joining the words and good wishes that were contained there, this is one of the most

ideological texts of this kind. which i met, it mentions integrity, justice, and unity and friendship, literally everything is complete , you really confirm with your life that this is the case, remember, at least your trips to the zone of a special military operation and everything becomes obvious, and let’s return to speeches biden and what westerners say, politicians, journalists, just compare, they talk a lot about american values, about rules and accuse russia that this... supports terrorist groups, in general, this has always been the case, the americans talked about values, about rules, that they are committed to a certain ideology , liberal democracy, the soviet union supports terrorists there, all kinds of cannibals, these echoes of moscow, others, broadcasting various things there in the ninety- nine years, they simply created an image that during the cold war, the soviet union supported all sorts of people and so on, but the americans, they are, if you are a liberal, if you are a democrat, you...